Migne Reading Room

PL 5 · cols. 129–130

De epistolis S. Dionysii papae deperditis et suppositis (Epistolae IV–VII)

Letter IV

PL 5:129
EPISTOLA IV.
Letter IV.
Ab Eusebio lib. VII Hist., cap. 9 memoratur Epistola Dionysii Alexandrini ad Dionysium Romanum de Luciano: nec de epistola ista quidquam aliunde novimus. Porro Lucianus i⟨l⟩le, de quo, seu cujus gratia scripta erat, creditur Cypriani successor, cujus Optatus lib. I meminit his verbis: « Erat altare loco suo, in quo pacifici episcopi retro temporis obtulerunt, Cyprianus, Lucianus et caeteri. » Ideoque scriptam non immerito existimat vir eruditus, ut inter Stephani Cyprianique successores pax illibata servaretur. Quemadmodum enim antea simul suscitavit Deus et Victorem, ut circa diem Paschae apostolicam tueretur traditionem, et Irenaeum, ut pacem inter dissidentes ecclesias componeret; ita et non sine Dei nutu eodem tempore Stephanus romanae Ecclesiae et Dionysius alexandrinae praefuerunt; sed ut ille divinae circa baptismum traditionis vindex, hic pacis ecclesiasticae sequester esset. Quae autem de hac epistola conjiciuntur, ut ad initia pontificatus Dionysii Romani referatur, postulant.
A letter of Dionysius of Alexandria to Dionysius of Rome concerning Lucian is mentioned by Eusebius in book 7 of the History, chapter 9; nor do we know anything about that letter from any other source. Moreover, that Lucian about whom, or for whose sake, it had been written is believed to be the successor of Cyprian, whom Optatus mentions in book 1 in these words: 'The altar stood in its place, on which the peaceable bishops of past time made offering, Cyprian, Lucian and the rest.' And therefore a learned man judges, not without reason, that it was written so that unbroken peace might be preserved between the successors of Stephen and of Cyprian. For just as God earlier raised up at the same time both Victor, to defend the apostolic tradition concerning the day of Easter, and Irenaeus, to settle peace between the dissenting churches; so also, not without the will of God, Stephen presided over the Roman Church and Dionysius over the Alexandrian at the same time; but so that the former should be the champion of the divine tradition concerning baptism, the latter the mediator of ecclesiastical peace. But the conjectures made about this letter require that it be referred to the beginning of the pontificate of Dionysius of Rome.
V.
V.
Dionysii Romani episcopi ad Caesariensem in Cappadocia Ecclesiam desideratur epistola, quam Basilius ejusdem civitatis episcopus Caesareae asservatam atque ipsa majorum memoria celebrem esse testatur (Basil., ep. 220, et Damas., ep. 2, n. 3). Dionysius cum hac epistola, qua Caesarienses consolabatur afflictos, legatos mittebat qui fratres eorum a captivitate redemptos liberarent. Hanc autem
A letter of Dionysius, bishop of Rome, to the Church of Caesarea in Cappadocia is lacking, which Basil, bishop of that same city, testifies was preserved at Caesarea and was celebrated in the very memory of the elders (Basil, Letter 220, and Damasus, Letter 2, no. 3). With this letter, by which Dionysius consoled the afflicted Caesareans, he sent envoys to ransom their brethren from captivity and set them free. But this
Caesariensium captivitatem contigisse conjectura est post annum 260, quo Valerianus a Persis deletus captusque est. Exinde enim barbarorum incursionibus vicinae Romanorum provinciae patere coeperunt. Nominatim vero Scythas, hoc est Gotthos, circa annum 264, in Cappadociae civitates excurrisse, indeque plures captivos secum abduxisse Philostorgius lib. II, cap. 5, tradit.
captivity of the Caesareans, it is conjectured, took place after the year 260, in which Valerian was overthrown and captured by the Persians. For from that time the neighbouring provinces of the Romans began to lie open to the incursions of the barbarians. Specifically, Philostorgius, book 2, chapter 5, relates that the Scythians, that is, the Goths, about the year 264, made raids into the cities of Cappadocia and from there led away many captives with them.
VI.
VI.
Apud Eusebium lib. VII, cap. 30, concilii Antiocheni legitur epistola « Dionysio (romano) Maximo (qui Dionysio Alexandrino successerat) et omnibus ubicumque in orbe terrarum collegis episcopis, presbyteris, diaconis, et universae Ecclesiae catholicae » inscripta, qua Paulus Samosatensis ab episcopatu depulsus, et in ejus locum Domnus suffectus renuntiatur. Pene quidem tota describitur ab Eusebio; sed cum praeter inscriptionem nihil habeat speciale, quod aut ad Dionysium, aut ad ejus sedem attineat, eam indicare satis habemus. Concilium autem Antiochenum, unde scripta est, Eusebius, lib. II, c. 29, celebratum dicit « temporibus Aureliani imperatoris » : qui quidem anno 270, circa mensem aprilem Claudio II successit. Unde non longe ante Dionysii nostri obitum, aut eo etiam mortuo, sed cum mortis ejus nuntium Antiochiam nondum pervenisset, conscripta creditur.
In Eusebius, book 7, chapter 30, there is read a letter of the council of Antioch addressed "to Dionysius (the Roman), to Maximus (who had succeeded Dionysius of Alexandria), and to all fellow bishops, presbyters and deacons wherever they are in the whole world, and to the entire catholic Church", by which Paul of Samosata is announced as deposed from the episcopate and Domnus as appointed in his place. It is indeed copied out almost in its entirety by Eusebius; but since apart from the address it has nothing particular that pertains either to Dionysius or to his see, we consider it enough to point it out. Now the council of Antioch, from which it was written, Eusebius, book 2, chapter 29, says was held "in the times of the emperor Aurelian", who in fact succeeded Claudius II in the year 270, about the month of April. Hence it is believed to have been composed not long before the death of our Dionysius, or even after he had died, but when the news of his death had not yet reached Antioch.
VII.
VII.
Dionysio papae Isidorus Mercator duas supposuit epistolas, unam ad Urbanum praefectum, alteram ad Severum episcopum, suo loco cum reliquis ejusdem opificis edendas.
To Pope Dionysius Isidore Mercator falsely ascribed two letters, one to Urban the prefect, the other to Severus the bishop, which are to be published in their place with the rest of the same craftsman's [fabrications].
Editors' notes and page, col. 129

Page

  • running head: 129 CONCILIUM ROMANUM IN CAUSA DIONYSII ALE[XANDRINI] (cut off at the image edge; column number 129 not set)
  • marginal letters: A Ab Eusebio lib. VII Hist.; B et non sine Dei nutu; C a captivitate redemptos; D Concilium romanum. Hoc concilium
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: a full-width band stands across cols 129/130 in mid-page: the 5 paragraph(s) above it in col 130 are set here, after the 4 above it in col 129 (reading order, moved on receipt); the band itself (its title lines) is not set by the volunteer page: set it here, at the move, with full_width
  • other: the column continues with Concilium romanum. Hoc concilium (another unit); not set here
PL 5:130
Editors' notes and page, col. 130

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: tempore Dionysii papae› · call in col 130 (in the full-width title "Habitum anno CCLXIII, tempore Dionysii papae", printed across both columns; the call falls over col 130)

Dubius est annus.

The year is uncertain.

(printed under page 69)

Page

  • running head: …AUSA DIONYSII ALEXANDRINI HABITUM. 130 (left part of the head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹post annum 260, quo›; B ‹fectus renuntiatur. Pene›; C ‹dem opificis edendas›; D ‹num ad concilium citat›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the 5 paragraph(s) of this column above the full-width band are set under col 129 (reading order, moved on receipt)
  • other: the text of this column below the full-width band belongs to the next unit; not set here (rail-only part)
  • misprints kept as printed: ‹Eusebius, lib. II, c. 29› (para VI) — the page prints "lib. ii"; the passage on Aurelian is Eusebius, Hist. eccl. VII, 29 (set under col 129's rail; English follows the print)