PL 5 · cols. 152–156
S. Felicis papae I et martyris epistolae dubiae quatuor
Letters III–IV
Migne Reading Room
PL 5 · cols. 152–156
Letters III–IV
(1) ‹anchor: seducere corda fidelium quaerunt› · call in col 153
Videsis Ithacii adv. Varimadum Arianum, cap. 18, 19, 20, eorumque titulos, atque inde fraudem agnosce.
See Ithacius against Varimadus the Arian, chapters 18, 19, 20, and their titles, and from them recognize the fraud.
(printed under page 79)
(2) ‹anchor: quia secundum› · call in col 153
Ithacii cap. 20, quo mentionem fieri vides superiorum.
Ithacius, chapter 20, where you see mention made of the preceding.
(printed under page 79)
[Notes to the end of the Felix section, above the section rule.] (printed under page 80)
(1) ‹anchor: EPISTOLA IV (title band)› · call in col 155 [the note runs from col 155 into col 156]
Hujus epistolae fragmentum extat in concilio Chalcedonensi, actione prima, et apud Cyrillum in sua Apologia. Doctissimis quibusdam viris auctoribus, a Felice II scriptam fuisse existimatum est, hac de causa, quod praedictum fragmentum utrobique post epistolam Julii papae attexatur. Verum argumentum et titulus epistolae eam sententiam firmissime refellunt. Nam si scriptum est, quod titulus indicat, ad Maximum Alexandrinum episcopum, Dionysii successorem, non secundus, sed primus Felix eam scripsisse potuit: eodem enim tempore Felix Dionysii romani pontificis successor, universae Ecclesiae praesedit, quo Maximus post Dionysium Alexandrinae Ecclesiae praefuit. Occasio scribendae hujus epistolae haec est: Cum a Paulo Samosateno catholicae veritati recens vulnus inflictum esset, et cicatrix de errore Sabellii nondum obducta fuisset, Felix pontifex de Filii Dei divinitate, ac pariter humanitate, naturisque duabus in una persona distinctis, ad Maximum Alexandrinum episcopum hanc epistolam scripsit, ut bellum adversus Sabellium et Samosatenum a duobus Dionysiis horum antecessoribus coeptum, utriusque successores ardentibus animis prosequerentur. Proinde hac epistola velut ancipiti gladio utramque haeresim uno ictu confodit; ut dum naturam divinam in Christo humanitati ejusdem indivise conjunctam ostendit, Pauli haeresim condemnet: dum vero humanam in eodem Christo a natura divina distinctam esse, et divinae substantiae in tribus personis subsistentiam demonstrat, Sabellium confutet. Quod autem in Chalcedonensi concilio, et apud Cyrillum praedictis locis post Julii epistolam recenseatur, ex eo accidit, quod in his recensendis nullam temporis rationem habuissent. Vincentius autem Lirinensis adversus haereses, cap. 42, probe intelligens tempore Felicis secundi nullum Alexandrinae Ecclesiae praefuisse episcopum, nomine Maximum, habita ratione temporis, primo loco Felicem, deinde Julium nominat. Addit idem Vincentius hanc eamdem epistolam Felicis papae et martyris inter alia patrum testimonia in concilio Ephesino lectam fuisse (Vide Baron., anno Christi 273, num. 11, 12 et 13). SEVER. BINIUS.
A fragment of this letter survives in the Council of Chalcedon, first session, and in Cyril's Apology. On the authority of certain very learned men it has been thought to have been written by Felix II, for this reason: that the said fragment is in both places attached after the letter of Pope Julius. But the content and the title of the letter refute that opinion most firmly. For if it was written, as the title indicates, to Maximus bishop of Alexandria, successor of Dionysius, it could have been written not by the second but by the first Felix; for at the same time as Felix, successor of the Roman pontiff Dionysius, presided over the universal Church, Maximus presided over the Church of Alexandria after Dionysius. The occasion of writing this letter is this: when a fresh wound had been dealt to catholic truth by Paul of Samosata, and the scar from the error of Sabellius had not yet closed over, Pope Felix wrote this letter to Maximus bishop of Alexandria on the divinity and likewise the humanity of the Son of God, and the two natures distinct in one person, so that the war against Sabellius and the Samosatene begun by the two Dionysii, their predecessors, might be carried on with ardent spirit by the successors of both. Accordingly with this letter, as with a two-edged sword, he runs through both heresies with one stroke: in showing the divine nature in Christ undividedly joined to His humanity, he condemns the heresy of Paul; in demonstrating that the human nature in the same Christ is distinct from the divine, and the subsistence of the divine substance in three persons, he refutes Sabellius. That it is listed in the Council of Chalcedon and in Cyril, in the said places, after the letter of Julius happened because in listing these they took no account of chronology. But Vincent of Lérins, against the heresies, ch. 42, rightly understanding that in the time of Felix II no bishop named Maximus presided over the Church of Alexandria, taking account of chronology names Felix first and then Julius. The same Vincent adds that this same letter of Felix, pope and martyr, was read among other testimonies of the Fathers at the Council of Ephesus (see Baronius, year of Christ 273, nos. 11, 12 and 13). Severinus Binius.
(printed under page 80)
(2) ‹anchor: the Greek of Epistola IV (call in col 156; the Greek is set in this file)› · call in col 156
Graecum textum exhibemus ex actione I concilii Ephesini, in qua lecta sunt a Petro presbytero Alexandriae et primicerio notariorum selecta ex sanctis Patribus testimonia de Incarnatione D. N. J. C. atque ex capite II partis III ejusdem concilii, sive Apologetico S. Cyrilli Alexandrini patriarchae pro duodecim capitibus adversus orientales episcopos. LABB.
We give the Greek text from the first session of the Council of Ephesus, in which the testimonies on the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ selected from the holy Fathers were read by Peter, priest of Alexandria and chief of the notaries, and from chapter II of part III of the same council, that is, the Apologeticus of St Cyril, patriarch of Alexandria, for the twelve chapters against the eastern bishops. Labbe.
(printed under page 80)
(a) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot image› · call in col 155
Clerum Labb.
Clerum ("the clergy"): Labbe.
[Below the rule: DE SANCTO EUTYCHIANO PAPA — NOTITIA HISTORICA. Its own note follows.] (printed under page 80)
(1) ‹anchor: januarii concurrit› · call in col 155
Pagius, in Critic., ad annum 274 : Baronius 275, num. V, et ad annum 283, num. IX; Coustant., Epist. rom. pontif., tom. I, pag. 298.
Pagi, in the Critica, at the year 274; Baronius, 275, no. 5, and at the year 283, no. 9; Coustant, Epistolae Romanorum pontificum, vol. 1, p. 298.
(printed under page 80)
Migne's Latin of the Epistola IV fragment, printed in col 155 beside the Greek (col 156). Set here untranslated, because the Greek is layer 1 (Ray NR-330 B, settle round 4). De incarnatione vero Verbi et fide credimus in Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum ex Maria Virgine natum, quoniam ipse est aeternus Dei Filius: Nec enim hominem assumpsit Dei Filius, ut esset alter praeter ipsum: sed Deus existens perfectus, factus est simul et homo perfectus, incarnatus ex Virgine.
(2) ‹anchor: Περὶ› · call in col 156
Graecum textum exhibemus ex actione I concilii Ephesini, in qua lecta sunt a Petro presbytero Alexandriae et primicerio notariorum selecta ex sanctis Patribus testimonia de Incarnatione D. N. J. C. atque ex capite II partis III ejusdem concilii, sive Apologetico S. Cyrilli Alexandrini patriarchae pro duodecim capitibus adversus orientales episcopos. LABB.
We give the Greek text from session I of the Council of Ephesus, in which Peter, presbyter of Alexandria and chief of the notaries, read selected testimonies from the holy Fathers on the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ, and from chapter II of part III of the same council, that is, from the Apologeticus of St Cyril, patriarch of Alexandria, for the twelve chapters against the Eastern bishops. Labbe.
[Heading across both columns: LECTIONES VARIANTES. — Variant readings.] (printed under page 80)