PL 5 · cols. 83–88
S. Sixti papae II epistolae dubiae duae
Letter II
Migne Reading Room
PL 5 · cols. 83–88
Letter II
(1) ‹anchor: Epistola› · call in col 83
(printed under page 46) (1) Epistola. Hanc epistolam occasione Sabellii, Noeti, Ebionis et Cerinthi sectariorum scriptam esse ad Gratum episcopum, ipsum initium epistolae indicat. Sabellius enim haeresiarcha hoc pontifice ab inferis progressus, omnem personarum distinctionem in Deo sustulit: reliqui vero Christum ante incarnationem nihil fuisse dicebant. Ut horum ergo errores solide refellat, et consulentem hac de re episcopum instruat, hanc ad illum epistolam scribit, apertis testimoniis scripturae probans, Christum, quoad divinam naturam, aeternum aeterni Patris Filium esse, et a Patre distinctam in divinitate personam esse; ac semper sine ullo temporis principio extitisse. Reliqua, quae et sequenti epistola notanda videntur, praecedentibus praecedentium pontificum epistolis annotata sunt.
Letter. The very opening of the letter shows that it was written to Bishop Gratus on the occasion of the sectaries Sabellius, Noetus, Ebion and Cerinthus. For the heresiarch Sabellius, come forth from the lower world under this pontiff, did away with every distinction of persons in God; the rest said that Christ was nothing before the incarnation. So, to refute their errors soundly and to instruct the bishop who had consulted him on the matter, he writes him this letter, proving by plain testimonies of Scripture that Christ, as to the divine nature, is the eternal Son of the eternal Father, and is a Person distinct from the Father within the Godhead, and has always existed without any beginning in time. The other points that seem worth noting in the following letter too have been annotated in the preceding letters of the preceding pontiffs.
(printed under page 46) (1) Hactenus Ithacii verba, unde fraus Mangonis detegitur evidentissime.
Thus far the words of Ithacius; whence the forger's fraud is exposed most plainly.
(printed under page 46)
(1) ‹anchor: nasci non potuit› · call in col 84
(printed under page 46)
(1) Falsa temporibus nota.
The date is false.
(printed under page 47)
(1) ‹anchor: Data kal. septembris› · call in col 86
(printed under page 47; text set under col 85)
- ARGUMENTUM. — I.–V. (the summary heads of Epistola II, printed in the text block above the salutation): editors' matter, not the work's; set in its place in the source column.
(1) Adnotatio falsa.
The dating is false.
(printed under page 48)
(1) ‹anchor: kalendas augusti› · call in col 88
(printed under page 48) (1) Adnotatio falsa.
A false dating.
(printed under page 48)