PL 5 · cols. 317–344
S. Victorini episcopi Petavionensis et martyris scholia in Apocalypsin beati Joannis
Editors' preface
Migne Reading Room
PL 5 · cols. 317–344
Editors' preface
(1) ‹anchor: not visible on this page (call in the title)› · call in col 317
COMMENTARIUS. (1) Hæc Scholia S. Victorini, Bononiæ, anno 1558, primus edidit Basilius Millanius monachus Casinas ex ms. codice bibliothecæ Casinensis, qui et adnotationes adjecit. Hanc omnium primam editionem typis excudendam curavimus : mire siquidem interpolatæ, quæ in bibliothecis Patrum occurrunt. GALLAND.
COMMENTARY. (1) These Scholia of St Victorinus were first published at Bologna in the year 1558 by Basilius Millanius, a monk of Monte Cassino, from a manuscript codex of the library of Monte Cassino; he also added annotations. We have had this first of all the editions set in type, for those that occur in the Bibliothecae Patrum are remarkably interpolated. GALLAND.
(printed under page 161) (2) Carnem quæ corrupta est. Hunc locum, nisi quid quispiam afferat melius, ita cuperem emendari : Carnem quæ corrupta non est in morte, et habet per passionem sacerdotium, apertissime tradunt.
(2) "The flesh which was corrupted." Unless someone offers something better, I should wish this passage emended thus: "They most plainly teach that the flesh which was not corrupted in death also holds the priesthood through the passion."
(printed under page 161) (3) Abbatum est multitudo. Opusculum sane doctum et utile, si universum attendas, et de quo amare auctorem, et ei debere te plurimum lubens fateare. Sed alicubi ita friget, ut vix illud homine docto dignum censeas, et in dubium auctorem voces, quod interdum videatur recentioris cujuspiam hominis non admodum eruditi commentationem redolere : ut heic in abbatum appellatione. Nam quo tempore Victorinus floruit, Antonius primus abbas paulo anterior fuerat, nisi quis dixerit monachismum usque eo ardenter homines complexos eo tempore fuisse, ut plerique abbates exstiterint. Quid quod abbatorum etiam scriptum reperi? nisi quis forte judicet albatorum legendum esse : quam suspicionem mihi satis fuerit indicasse, cum nullam certam in tanta rei et corrupti exemplaris ignoratione rationem assignare queam.
(3) "There is a multitude of abbots." A truly learned and useful little work, if you consider it as a whole, one for which you would gladly confess that you love its author and owe him a great deal. But in some places it is so flat that you would hardly think it worthy of a learned man, and you would call its author into doubt, because at times it seems to smack of the commentary of some more recent and not very erudite man: as here, in the term "abbots." For at the time when Victorinus flourished, Antony, the first abbot, had lived only a little before, unless someone should say that men had embraced monasticism so ardently at that time that there were very many abbots. What of the fact that I also found "abbatorum" written? Unless perhaps someone judges that "albatorum" [of those clothed in white] should be read: it will be enough for me to have pointed out this suspicion, since, in such ignorance of the matter and with a corrupt exemplar, I can assign no certain reason.
(printed under page 161)
(2) ‹anchor: carnem quæ corrupta est› · call in col 318
(printed under page 161)
(3) ‹anchor: abbatum est multitudo› · call in col 318
(printed under page 161)
(1) ‹anchor: vox aquarum multarum› · call in col 319
(printed under page 162) (1) Et vox ejus tamquam vox aquarum mularum. Non miraberis heic et aliis præterea locis aliquot apostoli verba inverso ordine legi, cum paulo post scriptorem hunc nostrum affirmantem audieris, in libri hujus interpretatione non verborum ordinem, aut textus consequentiam sed rerum intelligentiam lectorem sequi debere.
(1) "And his voice as the voice of many waters." You will not be surprised that here, and in some other places besides, the apostle's words are read in inverted order, since a little later you will hear this writer of ours affirm that in interpreting this book the reader ought to follow not the order of the words or the sequence of the text but the understanding of the things.
(printed under page 162) (2) Auferri vero improperium suum poscunt. Nos illud poscunt ex superiore lectione de nostro addidimus, ut locutionem clariorem efficeremus. Neque ratio a nobis ubicumque aliquid emendavimus, continuo reddenda fuerit; cum illud tam firmum est et per se planum, ut a quoquam quin ita sit scribendum, dubitari non possit : nam omnia persequi prope esset infinitum, usque adeo singula pæne verba perturbata et corrupta erant.
(2) "But they ask that their reproach be taken away." We added that "poscunt" on our own from the reading above, to make the expression clearer. Nor need a reason be given at once wherever we have emended anything, when the point is so firm and plain in itself that no one could doubt that it should be written so: for to pursue everything would be almost endless, so disordered and corrupt were nearly all the individual words.
(printed under page 162) (3) Operantur. Crediderim hoc verbum pro vivunt usurpatum ab auctore fuisse, et dispensatores pro dissipatores, portant item pro ferunt ( quæ duæ voces e vestigio sequuntur ) dixisse.
(3) "They work." I would believe that this word was used by the author for "they live," and that he said "dispensatores" [stewards] for "dissipatores" [squanderers], and likewise "portant" for "ferunt" [they bear] (these two words follow immediately).
(printed under page 162)
(2) ‹anchor: improperium suum poscunt› · call in col 320
(printed under page 162)
(3) ‹anchor: et operantur› · call in col 320
(printed under page 162)
(1) ‹anchor: ut delibatum› · call in col 321
(printed under page 163) (1) Delibatum heic et alicubi posuit pro idolothyto, hoc est eo quod simulacris immolabatur. Exorcizare vero pro a temeratæ seu pollutæ religionis crimine expiare accipi videtur, quod est contra propriam verbi significationem : nam ἐξορκίζειν potius est obstringere, quam solvere religione.
(1) Here and elsewhere he has put "delibatum" [a thing offered] for "idolothytum," that is, what was sacrificed to images. "Exorcizare," on the other hand, seems to be taken as "to purge from the guilt of a profaned or polluted religious observance," which is against the proper meaning of the word: for "exorkizein" is rather to bind by a religious obligation than to release from one.
(printed under page 163)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images (the word "ferturus")› · call in col 323 or 324 (not visible)
(printed under page 164) (1) Ferturus pro laturus, et si non ex usu grammaticorum, uti etiam paulo ante odire, pro odisse, dicimus; lectionem tamen antiqui, et maxime vetustate venerabilis codicis immutare noluimus.
(1) "Ferturus" for "laturus" [about to bear]; and although it is not according to the grammarians' usage, just as a little before we say "odire" for "odisse" [to hate], we were nevertheless unwilling to alter the reading of an ancient codex, one most venerable for its age.
(printed under page 164) (2) Hominis autem figura enititur Matthæus enuntiare nobis genus Mariæ. Vide ut tradat Matthæum genealo- (continues)
(2) "Matthew, in the figure of a man, strives to declare to us the lineage of Mary." See how he represents Matthew [as giving] the genea- (continues)
(printed under page 164)
(2) ‹anchor: genus Mariæ› · call in col 324
(printed under page 164)
(1) ‹anchor: totidem faciunt› · call in col 325
(printed under page 165) (1) Ideo viginti et quatuor totidem faciunt, quot sunt seniores. In manuscripto ita legebatur, Ideo viginti et quatuor faciunt tot numerum, quot et seniores; qui error et si non a librario, sed ab auctore ipso manasse credendus est; eumdem tamen, quod cum recta loquendi ratione pugnet, additione adverbii totidem, ac, et, in sunt, verbum, mutatione tollendum censui.
(1) "Therefore twenty-four make as many as there are elders." In the manuscript it read thus: "Therefore twenty-four make so many a number as also the elders"; and although this error must be believed to have come not from a copyist but from the author himself, I nevertheless judged that, because it conflicts with correct usage, it should be removed by adding the adverb "totidem" and by changing "et" into the verb "sunt."
(printed under page 165)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images› · call in col 325 (not visible)
(printed under page 165) (2) In epitomis Theodori invenies. Interciderunt sicut alia pleraque viri hujus monimenta; de quo quid tibi pro certo referam non habeo : nam quo minus eumdem Heracliensem aut Antiochenum illum esse affirmem, ratio temporum refragatur.
(2) "You will find it in the epitomes of Theodore." They have perished, like most of this man's other memorials; and I have nothing certain to tell you about him: for the chronology forbids me to affirm that he is the same as the well-known Theodore of Heraclea or of Antioch.
(printed under page 165) (3) Id est evangelica actio et doctrina Domini. Nos in quarto casu hæc verba legenda et pro Evangelica, Evangelia scribendum esse existimamus. Cæterum de eo suo quisque judicabit arbitrio : nam quid ex ea structura verborum intelligas, dispicere satis non possumus.
(3) "That is, the Gospel action and teaching of the Lord." We think these words should be read in the accusative, and that "Evangelia" should be written for "Evangelica." But on this each will judge by his own discretion: for we cannot well discern what one is to understand from that arrangement of the words.
(printed under page 165) (4) Omnes victorias suas projecerunt. Verba illa suas et projecerunt de nostro addidimus, victoriæ præterea pro quo victoriam legebatur, nullo (judicio nostro) (continues)
(4) "They cast down all their victories." We added the words "suas" and "projecerunt" on our own; moreover, "victoriæ," for which "victoriam" was read, [we ...] with no (in our judgement) (continues)
(printed under page 165)
(2) ‹anchor: Theodori invenies› · call in col 326 (n325 records this call as in col 325, not visible; it is printed in col 326 after "invenies")
(printed under page 165)
(3) ‹anchor: doctrina Domini› · call in col 326
(printed under page 165)
(4) ‹anchor: suas projecerunt› · call in col 326
(printed under page 165)
(1) ‹anchor: lana succina› · call in col 327
(printed under page 166) (1) Succina. Ex Heb. IX, 20. legendum videtur coccinea. GALLAND.
(1) "Succina" [amber-coloured]. From Heb. 9:20 it seems "coccinea" [scarlet] should be read. GALLAND.
(printed under page 166) (2) Emiserunt. Dictionem hanc (emiserunt) addidimus, et sagittas ubi sagittæ prius legebatur, reposuimus : cuivis certe melior hæc lectio videri debet, quam illa antiquæ scripturæ, cui nos non valde confidimus.
(2) "They sent forth." We added this word ("emiserunt"), and restored "sagittas" where "sagittæ" was read before: to anyone this reading should certainly seem better than that of the old writing, in which we have no great confidence.
(printed under page 166)
(2) ‹anchor: pertingentes emiserunt› · call in col 328
(printed under page 166)
(1) ‹anchor: duas aras fieri› · call in col 329
(printed under page 167) (1) Mandans duas aras fieri. Pro quo in manuscripto corrupte admodum (nisi fallor) legebatur. Mediante qui duas aras fecerat. Neque tamen hanc emendationem ita ratam firmamque habebo, ut si meliorem quispiam commonstraverit, non sim, illa deserta, eam quam ille docuerit, probaturus.
(1) "Commanding that two altars be made." In place of this the manuscript read, very corruptly (unless I am mistaken): "Through the mediation of him who had made two altars." Yet I shall not hold this emendation so settled and firm that, if anyone points out a better one, I would not abandon it and approve the one he has shown.
(printed under page 167) (2) Mitti etiam de cœlo orationes Ecclesiæ. Locus hic obscurus est, nec eum mendo vacare existimamus : sed nos quidem notare illum, non emendare voluimus, ut alii etiam religiosi homines habeant unde exerçendi ingenii occasionem accipiant. Quamquam non inepte nobis conjectare videmur, si pro illos, illas, et pro æstimari, extingui legamus : quibus si hæc etiam correctio accesserit, ut prior illa conjunctio (et) post Ecclesiæ dictionem ponatur; non video cur non multo incorruptior et clarior, quæ primo tam obscura erat et contaminata, structura illa verborum efficiatur : de qua quidquid studiosiores homines statuerint, si rationem aliquam attulerint, libenter sequemur.
(2) "That the prayers of the Church are also sent from heaven." This passage is obscure, and we do not think it free of error; but we chose to mark it rather than emend it, so that other devout men too may have occasion to exercise their wits. And yet we seem to ourselves to conjecture not unfittingly if for "illos" we read "illas," and for "æstimari" [be reckoned], "extingui" [be extinguished]: if to these this further correction were added, that the first conjunction ("et") be placed after the word "Ecclesiæ," I do not see why that arrangement of words, at first so obscure and contaminated, would not be made much sounder and clearer. Whatever more studious men decide about it, if they bring some reason, we shall gladly follow.
(printed under page 167)
(2) ‹anchor: orationes Ecclesiæ› · call in col 330
(printed under page 167)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("Tunc mittet Filius hominis nuntios")› · call in col 331 (not visible)
(printed under page 168) (1) Tunc mittet Filius hominis nuntios. Ita omnes quæcumque cum ex Veteri, tum Novo Testamento, citantur auctoritates, corruptæ sunt et perversæ, ut cuique videre liceat, Victorinum hunc nostrum, quicumque ille fuerit, aut omnino græce nihil scisse, aut editionem aliquam qua passim eo tempore Ecclesia uteretur, religiose nimis secutum esse. Nam quod de fossa Nembroth, et Ecclesiæ spiritu mox subjungit, non parum difficultatis et obscuritatis habet : præter enim quam quod verba illa a græcis unde hausta sunt, multum discrepant, posterior etiam ille verborum ordo (nisi fallimur) ita depravatus est, ut difficile admodum sit germanum ex his sensum elicere : si quid tamen doctiores homines in medium attulerint quod rationi magis consentaneum sit, illorum sententiæ facile subscribemus.
(1) "Then the Son of Man will send his messengers." All the authorities whatever that are cited, from the Old as well as the New Testament, are so corrupt and distorted that anyone may see that this Victorinus of ours, whoever he was, either knew no Greek at all or followed too scrupulously some edition which the Church then used here and there. For what he presently adds about the pit of Nimrod and the spirit of the Church holds no little difficulty and obscurity: for besides the fact that those words differ greatly from the Greek from which they were drawn, the latter order of the words too (unless we are mistaken) is so corrupted that it is very difficult to draw a genuine sense from them. If, however, more learned men bring forward something more consonant with reason, we shall readily subscribe to their opinion.
(printed under page 168)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("Vis ibimus")› · call in col 331 or 332 (not visible)
(printed under page 168) (2) Vis ibimus. Quis heic non videat latinis auribus et orationis ornatui usque eo male consultum esse, ut si quis auctorem in jus vocet, causamque læsæ latinæ linguæ majestatis dicere compellat, non injuria aut temere id fecisse videatur?
(2) "Vis ibimus." Who does not see here that Latin ears and the elegance of style have been so ill served that, if anyone were to summon the author to court and compel him to plead a charge of injuring the majesty of the Latin tongue, he would seem to have done so neither unjustly nor rashly?
(printed under page 168)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("Mensuram autem templi Dei")› · call in col 333 or 334 (not visible)
(printed under page 169) (1) Mensuram autem templi Dei. Pro quo in manuscripto legebatur filii Dei. Nos illud mutavimus, quod plane videretur Apostoli verbis repugnare.
(1) "But the measure of the temple of God." For which the manuscript read "of the Son of God." We changed that, because it plainly seemed to conflict with the Apostle's words.
(printed under page 169)
(1) ‹anchor: et præposterat› · call in col 335
(printed under page 170) (1) Præposterat. Pro præpostero ordine utitur, proprium illorum temporum, et suæ fortasse etiam nationis usum loquendi secutus.
(1) "Præposterat" [puts out of order]. He uses it for "employs an inverted order," following the usage of speech proper to those times, and perhaps also to his own nation.
(printed under page 170)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("Septem capita septem montes sunt")› · call in col 337 or 338 (not visible)
(printed under page 171) (1) Septem capita septem montes sunt. Hoc ex cap. XVII, 9. sumptum est, usque eo, ubi iterum verba 13, capitis incipit interpretari, cum ait, Numerus enim hominis est : quæ verba mutare noluimus ob id quod interpres ipse dicit Spiritum sanctum non servare verborum ordinem, sed a postremis interdum ad prima interpretanda transire.
(1) "The seven heads are seven hills." This is taken from ch. 17:9, as far as the point where he again begins to interpret the words of chapter 13, when he says, "For it is the number of a man": we chose not to alter these words, because the interpreter himself says that the Holy Spirit does not keep the order of the words but sometimes passes from the last things to interpret the first.
(printed under page 171)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images› · call in col 337 or 338 (not visible)
(printed under page 171) (2) Hoc ex cap. XVII, sumptum est. GALL.
(2) This is taken from ch. 17. GALLAND.
(printed under page 171) (3) Ait modo. Hic locus me diu torsit, cum fœde ( ni fallor) corruptus esset : eum tamen corrigere conatus sum, quod an consecutus sim, eruditiores homines judicabunt. In manuscripto ita legebatur : Ait modo cum ille advenerit, amputas loco octavo, quoniam in illa est consummatio. Octavo loco antichristum venturum dicit; nam octonario numero perfectio designatur, cum mundi finis advenerit, ideo addit : quoniam in illo est consummatio.
(3) "He says, 'now.'" This passage tormented me for a long time, since it was (unless I am mistaken) foully corrupted; yet I tried to correct it, and whether I succeeded, more learned men will judge. In the manuscript it read thus: "He says, now when he has come, you cut off in the eighth place, because in it is the consummation." He says that Antichrist will come in the eighth place; for by the number eight perfection is signified, when the end of the world has come; therefore he adds: "because in it is the consummation."
(printed under page 171) (4) Nunc redit ad cap. XIII. GALL.
(4) Now he returns to ch. 13. GALLAND.
(printed under page 171)
(3) ‹anchor: Ait modo› · call in col 338
(printed under page 171)
(4) ‹anchor: De inferno autem› · call in col 338
(printed under page 171)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("TEITAN")› · call in col 339 (not visible)
(printed under page 172) (1) TEITAN. Imitatur heic Victorinus Irenæum, contr. Hæres., lib., V, c. 30, § 3, vel, si mavis, Hippolytum ejus discipulum, Demonstr. de Chr. et Antichr., c. L. Videsis quæ annotabamus ad citatum locum Hippolyti, tom. II Bibl. Patrum, pag. 455. Ad subsequentem autem vocem DICLVX quod attinet, vix dubito quin eam sumpserit a nostro Victorino Nicolaus Liranus in suis Postill. perpet. ad Apoc., XIII, 18. Qua de re consulendus Bossuetius, doctissimus Meldensis episcopus, sur l'Apoc. XIII, 18. Hinc patet minus provide heic argui sanctum Patrem nostrum a Millanio. GAL.
(1) TEITAN. Here Victorinus imitates Irenaeus, Against Heresies, book 5, ch. 30, § 3, or, if you prefer, Hippolytus his disciple, Demonstration concerning Christ and Antichrist, ch. 50. See what we noted on the cited passage of Hippolytus, vol. 2 of the Bibliotheca Patrum, p. 455. As for the following word DICLVX, I hardly doubt that Nicholas of Lyra took it from our Victorinus in his Postillae perpetuae on Apoc. 13:18. On this, consult Bossuet, the most learned bishop of Meaux, "sur l'Apocalypse" 13:18. Hence it is clear that our holy Father is here censured by Millanius with too little foresight. GALLAND.
(printed under page 172)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("DICLVX")› · call in col 339 (not visible)
(printed under page 172) (2) DICLVX. Hujusmodi deductio seu tralatio nominis arguit hominem istum humanioris ac politioris litteraturæ plane inscium fuisse. Usque eo enim inepta visa est, et viro docto indigna hæc interpretatio, ut plane suspicari libuerit eam in margine ab imperito aliquo ascriptam potius, quam alii postea imperitiores commentario attexuerint, quam ab auctore traditam fuisse.
(2) DICLVX. A derivation or transfer of the name of this kind shows that this man was wholly ignorant of humane and polished letters. For this interpretation seemed so inept, and so unworthy of a learned man, that one might well suspect it was written in the margin by some unskilled person, which others still more unskilled afterwards wove into the commentary, rather than that it was handed down by the author.
(printed under page 172)
(3) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("D quippe quingenti")› · call in col 339 (not visible)
(printed under page 172) (3) D quippe quingenti. Ut heic, ita mox locis aliquot rectus pro quarto casu manet : frigida sane est, et levis meo judicio interpretatio; quam tamen ipsam eruditiorum judicio castigandam relinquere, quam de ea audacter quidquam statuere maluimus.
(3) "D, that is, five hundred." As here, so presently in some places, the nominative stands for the accusative. The interpretation is indeed frigid and, in my judgement, trivial; yet we have preferred to leave it to be corrected by the judgement of more learned men rather than boldly decide anything about it.
(printed under page 172)
(1) ‹anchor: Domini Jesu› · call in col 341
(printed under page 173) (1) In adventu Domini Jesu mandaturi. Quid si mundaturi legas, unius tantum litteræ mutatione? Neque nos ullum magis proprium quod affinitate syllabarum cum iis quæ subinde sequuntur cohæreret, verbum invenire potuimus.
(1) "Who are to give command at the coming of the Lord Jesus." What if you read "mundaturi" [who are to cleanse], by changing only one letter? Nor could we find any more fitting word that would agree, by kinship of syllables, with what follows immediately after.
(printed under page 173) (2) mille annorum regnum. Ego hunc locum, nisi (continues)
(2) "The reign of a thousand years." This passage, unless (continues)
(printed under page 173)
(2) ‹anchor: Mille annorum› · call in col 342
(printed under page 173)
(1) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("Adveniendi")› · call in col 343 or 344 (not visible)
(printed under page 174) (1) Adveniendi. Venturi, seu adveniente, opinor legi oportere.
(1) "Adveniendi" [of coming]. I think "venturi" [of the one who is to come] or "adveniente" [when he comes] should be read.
(printed under page 174)
(2) ‹anchor: not visible in the page-foot images ("Tutaverunt")› · call in col 343 or 344 (not visible)
(printed under page 174) (2) Tutaverunt. Pro tutati sunt positum esse existimo. Nos cum meliorem lectionem non haberemus, quam in veteri exemplari invenimus, etiam si minime nobis illa probaretur, reliquimus, ut eruditiores aut conjecturam nostram reciperent, aut locum ipsi suo arbitrio inquinatum castigarent. Obsoleta verba mutare nolui, ut ab antiquo codice quam minime possem declinarem. Ego in his annotationibus quæ tuto castigare potui, bona fide præstiti : neque sum, si quis opinionem meam improbaverit, continuo illi succensurus, tantum ille meliorem certioremque afferat; quam tantum abest ut rejiciam, ut ejusdem me defensorem sim sincere professurus : libellus certe ita male a librariis acceptus est, ut vix omni diligentia restitui posse videretur : quo fit, ut minus culpandi simus, si conjecturam alicubi maluimus sequi, quam contaminati exemplaris auctoritatem.
(2) "Tutaverunt" [they protected]. I think it was put for "tutati sunt." Since we had no better reading than the one we found in the old exemplar, we left it, even though we did not at all approve it, so that more learned men might either accept our conjecture or themselves correct the corrupted passage at their own discretion. I chose not to change obsolete words, so as to depart as little as I could from the ancient codex. In these annotations I have done in good faith what I could safely correct; nor, if anyone disapproves my opinion, shall I at once be angry with him, provided only that he brings a better and more certain one; so far from rejecting it, I shall sincerely profess myself its defender. The little book has certainly been so badly treated by the copyists that it scarcely seemed it could be restored with all diligence; hence we are the less to be blamed if in places we have preferred to follow conjecture rather than the authority of a corrupted exemplar.
(printed under page 174)