PL 54 · cols. 1098–1101
Leo the Great, Letters
Letters CXXXVI–CXXXVIII
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 1098–1101
Letters CXXXVI–CXXXVIII
(f) ‹servetur. Data› · printed under col 1097, running on under col 1098
Cod. Barb. collect. 11, notante Quesnello in margine, iv nonas Julii, male, quippe Vat. 3791 ejusdem collect. 11. cum caeteris aliarum collectionum mss., habent, iv kal. Junii, eademque dies signatur in epistola sequenti, quae simul scripta et transmissa fuit.
The Barberini manuscript of collection 11, as Quesnel notes in the margin, iv nonas Julii, wrongly, since Vatican 3791 of the same collection 11, with the other manuscripts of other collections, have iv kal. Junii; and the same day is marked in the following letter, which was written and sent at the same time.
(g) ‹EPISTOLA› · printed under col 1098
Alias 107. Quae autem antea 136 erat, nunc 168. Scripta 29 Maii an 454.
Formerly 107. The one that was formerly 136 is now 168. Written 29 May in the year 454.
(h) ‹AD MARCIANUM AUGUSTUM› · printed under col 1098 (the call in the heading is printed "(b)"; the note is printed "(h)")
Hanc epistolam primus edidit Lucas Holstenius ex mss. Barb. 3336 collect. 16. Eamdem emendavit Quesnellus ex Grim. collect. 18. Nos invenimus in Ratisponensi collect. 19, ex quo non pauca restituimus.
Lucas Holstenius first published this letter from the Barberini manuscript 3336 of collection 16. Quesnel emended it from the Grimani manuscript of collection 18. We found it in the Regensburg manuscript of collection 19, from which we have restored not a few things.
(i) ‹qui cessationem alloquii mei suo silentio› · printed under col 1098
Codd. Barb. et Ratisp. cum Holstenio, potuit.
The Barberini and Regensburg manuscripts, with Holstenius, potuit.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Cur Anatolio scribere intermiserit. — II. Quibus conditionibus illi reconcilietur. — III. De Andrea ab archidiaconatu dejecto, et Juliano commendato. — IV. Ut Carosus monachus compescatur.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Why he stopped writing to Anatolius. — II. On what conditions he is reconciled to him. — III. On Andrew, deposed from the archdeaconate, and on Julian, who is commended. — IV. That the monk Carosus be restrained.
(a) ‹insinuationem meam› · printed under col 1099
Ex cod. Barb. et Holstenio additur particula tam, quam sequens ut videtur exigere. Similiter et ante semper ex iisdem adjecimus.
From the Barberini manuscript and Holstenius the particle tam is added, which the following ut seems to require. Likewise we have added et before semper from the same sources.
(b) ‹vestrae gloriae debeantur› · printed under col 1099
Ita Holstenius et cod. Ratisp. Apud Quesnellum qui tales; male: neque enim imperatoris, de quo contextus loquitur, sed Anatolii epistola 132 indicatur.
So Holstenius and the Regensburg manuscript. In Quesnel, qui tales; wrongly: for it is not a letter of the emperor, of whom the context speaks, but Anatolius's letter 132 that is indicated.
(c) ‹gloriae vestrae instanter› · printed under col 1099
Ita cum Quesn. noster Ratisp. Cod. Barb., indiget; Holstenius ex ingenio correxit, indicet.
So our Regensburg manuscript, with Quesnel. The Barberini manuscript has indiget; Holstenius corrected by conjecture to indicet.
(d) ‹sub vestrae fidei radiis› · printed under col 1099
Holstenius cum ms. Barb., sperare, et in margine: Forte, spirare. Id Quesnellus recepit ex Grimanico, cui noster cod. Ratisp. astipulatur. Mox Barb., patiamini Quesn., patimini Ratisp., patemini, pro quo melius Holst., patiemini.
Holstenius, with the Barberini manuscript, has sperare, and in the margin: "Perhaps spirare." Quesnel adopted that from the Grimani manuscript, with which our Regensburg manuscript agrees. Next, the Barberini has patiamini, Quesnel patimini, the Regensburg patemini, for which Holstenius better reads patiemini.
(e) ‹memoria beati Flaviani› · printed under col 1099
Ita Ratisp. Quesn., in consolatione.
So the Regensburg manuscript. Quesnel has in consolatione.
(f) ‹regnante tranquillum› · printed under col 1099
Ratisp. hoc loco delet, Christo.
The Regensburg manuscript omits Christo at this place.
(g) printed under this column; its call is in col 1100, set in n1100. (h) printed under this column; its call is in col 1100, set in n1100.
(g) ‹EPISTOLA CXXXVII› · printed under col 1099
Alias 108. Quae autem antea 137 erat, nunc 169. Scripta 29 Maii an. 454.
Otherwise 108. The one that was formerly 137 is now 169. Written 29 May in the year 454.
(h) ‹AD EUMDEM MARCIANUM› · printed under col 1099
Hanc epistolam ex cod. Grimanico a Quesnello editam nullibi reperire licuit.
This letter, published by Quesnel from the Grimani manuscript, we have been able to find nowhere.
(i) ‹apud pietatem vestram› · printed under col 1100, running on under col 1101
Hinc colligitur solo pacis bono, non autem Alexandrinorum rationibus, quae non omnino persuaserant (ut in admonitione ad epist. 88 indicavimus) Leonem consensisse ut Pascha VIII kal. Maii celebraretur. Huc autem potissimum alludere videtur Prosper in Chronico integro Labbeano ad an. 455, ubi Leonis ad Marcianum epistolam memorat. Eodem anno, inquit, Pascha Dominicum die VIII kal. Maii celebratum est pertinaci intentione Alexandrini episcopi, cui omnes Orientales consentiendum putaverunt; quamvis S. papa Leo XV kal. Maii potius observandum protestaretur. Exstant ejusdem papae epistolae ad clementissimum principem Marcianum datae, quibus ratio veritatis sollicitatae evidenter patefacta est, ex quibus Ecclesia catholica instrui potest quod haec persuasio studio unitatis et pacis tolerata sit potius quam probata, non deinceps imitanda, ut quae exitialem attulit offensionem, omnem in perpetuum perdat auctoritatem. Confer epist. 142, c. 1. Licet vero Latini in posterioribus annis suum cyclum annorum 84 aliquamdiu retinuerint, inducta biennio post nova emendatione Victorii, qui saltum lunae ab anno decimo quarto ad decimum sextum protraxit; saeculo tamen sequenti illum deseruere, postquam Dionysius Exiguus Alexandrinum cyclum et regulas suo cyclo annorum 95 accommodatas et rationibus ac documentis munitas Latinis proposuit.
Hence it is gathered that Leo consented to Easter being celebrated on the 8th day before the Kalends of May solely for the good of peace, and not because of the reasons of the Alexandrians, which had not wholly persuaded him (as we pointed out in the admonition to epist. 88). To this Prosper seems chiefly to allude in the complete Chronicle published by Labbe, at the year 455, where he mentions Leo's letter to Marcian. "In the same year," he says, "the Lord's Pascha was celebrated on the 8th day before the Kalends of May through the stubborn insistence of the bishop of Alexandria, with whom all the Orientals thought they must agree; although the holy Pope Leo protested that the 15th day before the Kalends of May should rather be kept. There are extant letters of the same pope, addressed to the most clement prince Marcian, in which the reasoning of the truth in question is plainly set out, from which the catholic Church can be taught that this persuasion was tolerated out of zeal for unity and peace rather than approved, and is not to be imitated hereafter, so that what brought ruinous offence may lose all authority for ever." Compare epist. 142, c. 1. And although the Latins in later years retained their cycle of 84 years for some time, having introduced two years later the new emendation of Victorius, who carried the leap of the moon from the fourteenth year to the sixteenth, yet in the following century they abandoned it, after Dionysius Exiguus set before the Latins the Alexandrian cycle and rules, adapted to his cycle of 95 years and fortified with reasons and proofs.
Synopsis. — I. Gratias agit pro perfecta inquisitione de die paschali, de qua Proterii litteras se accepisse significat. — II. Oeconomorum Ecclesiae rationes, non judicum, sed sacerdotum examine discutiendas esse.
Synopsis. — I. He gives thanks for the completed enquiry into the day of Easter, about which he says he has received a letter of Proterius. — II. That the accounts of the Church's stewards are to be examined not by judges but by priests.
(i) continued from col 1100, set in n1100.
(a) ‹petii litteris, deprecarer› · printed under col 1101
Haec videntur respicere Aetii causam, quem cognitione habita in omnibus fuisse purgatum Leo a Juliano se accepisse testatur epist. 127, cap. 3. Forte enim hic Constantinopolitanae Ecclesiae archidiaconus de administratione bonorum culpatus, ut diligenti examine discuteretur, apud publicos seu laicos judices conventus fuerat. Id omnino novum cum S. Pontifici displicuisset, dedit ad Marcianum litteras hic indicatas atque deperditas, ac probabiliter sub idem tempus quo judicium de Aetio rescivit, nimirum paulo post scriptam epist. 127.
This seems to concern the case of Aetius, who, Leo testifies in epist. 127, cap. 3, had, as he learned from Julian, been cleared in every respect after an inquiry. For perhaps this archdeacon of the Church of Constantinople, blamed over the administration of its goods, had been summoned before public or lay judges so that the matter might be examined with diligent scrutiny. Since this, being altogether new, displeased the holy Pontiff, he sent Marcian the letter indicated here, which is lost, probably at about the time he learned of the judgement on Aetius, that is, a little after epist. 127 was written.
(b) ‹EPISTOLA CXXXVIII› · printed under col 1101
Alias 109. Quae autem antea 138 erat, nunc 170. Scripta 28 Julii an 454.
Otherwise 109. The one that was formerly 138 is now 170. Written 28 July in the year 454.
(c) ‹AD EPISCOPOS GALLIARUM› · printed under col 1101
Hanc epistolam a Quesnello exactam ad cod. Grimanicum, invenimus in mss. collect. 12, ad quam pertinet Venetus cod. 169, cum quo illam contulimus.
This letter, which Quesnel established from the Grimani manuscript, we found in the manuscripts of collection 12, to which the Venice manuscript 169 belongs, and we have collated it with that manuscript.
(d) ‹concordem, maxime› · printed under col 1101
Ms. Venet., id nobis principaliter.
The Venice manuscript: id nobis principaliter.
(e) ‹ignorantia, vel praesumptio› · printed under col 1101
Idem codex, vel praesumptione.
The same manuscript: vel praesumptione.
(f) printed under this column; its call is in col 1102, set in n1102. (g) printed under this column (running on under col 1102); its call is in col 1102, set in n1102.
Synopsis. — Hanc formatam paschalis diei indicem ad Gallicanos episcopos mittit, per eosdem ad Hispaniarum Ecclesias transmittendam; ubi et controversiae status exponitur.
Synopsis. — He sends this formal letter announcing the day of Easter to the bishops of Gaul, to be passed on through them to the Churches of Spain; in it the state of the controversy is also set out.