PL 54 · cols. 1113–1116
Leo the Great, Letters
Letters CXLV–CXLVII
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 1113–1116
Letters CXLV–CXLVII
(n) continued from col 1112, set in n1112.
(a) ‹EPISTOLA› (CXLV) · printed under col 1113
Alias 115. Scripta 11 Julii an. 457.
Otherwise 115. Written 11 July in the year 457.
(b) ‹AD LEONEM AUGUSTUM (call before the caption, printed "(a)")› · printed under col 1113
Exstat in mss. collect. 3, 8, 12, 19, 23 et in exemplo primae editionis sermonum S. Leonis.
It is extant in the manuscripts of collections 3, 8, 12, 19, 23 and in the copy of the first edition of the sermons of St Leo.
(c) ‹Officiis quae› · printed under col 1113
Aliae litterae gratulatoriae innuuntur, quae desunt. Novi imperatoris electionem acceperat ante kal. Junias, ut liquet ex epistola praecedenti.
Another letter of congratulation is meant, which is lost. He had received [news of] the new emperor's election before the Kalends of June, as is clear from the preceding letter.
(d) ‹divinitus praeparatum› · printed under col 1113
Tres codd. Vat. 5845, Vallicell. et Vercell. collect. 8, cum exemplo primae editionis Sermonum, laboris.
Three manuscripts, Vatican 5845, the Vallicelliana and the Vercelli manuscript of collection 8, with the copy of the first edition of the Sermons, read "laboris".
(e) ‹sentiat se› · printed under col 1113
Prima editio, impediri.
The first edition: "impediri".
(f) ‹violari, nisi› · printed under col 1113
Ita ex nostris mss. ac prima editione. Quesnellus, in universa caeterae editiones, in universali. Mox prospicitur in Vercellensi codice et prima editione; ac dein redditur in Ratisp.
So from our manuscripts and the first edition. Quesnel has "in universa", the other editions "in universali". Next, "prospicitur" in the Vercelli manuscript and the first edition; and then "redditur" in the Ratisbon manuscript.
(g) ‹libertas;› · printed under col 1113
Vulg. cum Vat. collect. 3, Ratisp. et exemplo primae editionis, ut cessantibus.
The common editions, with the Vatican manuscript of collection 3, the Ratisbon manuscript and the copy of the first edition: "ut cessantibus".
(h) printed under this column; its call is in col 1114, set in n1114. (i) printed under this column; its call is in col 1114, set in n1114. (j) printed under this column; its call is in col 1114, set in n1114. (k) printed under this column (running on under col 1114); its call is in col 1114, set in n1114.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Rogat ut perturbatae Alexandrinorum Ecclesiae succurrat. — II. De fide bene definita disceptandum denuo non esse; et ut catholicus Alexandrinae Ecclesiae episcopus praeficiatur.
SYNOPSIS. — I. He asks him to succour the disturbed Church of the Alexandrians. — II. That the faith, well defined, is not to be disputed afresh; and that a catholic bishop be set over the Church of Alexandria.
(h) ‹habebit effectum,› (call printed "(n)") · printed under col 1113
Quesn., si sanctam Chalcedonensem synodum.... firmatam, minus bene. Melius in anterioribus vulg., quorum lectionem mss. Ratisp. et Vallicell. ac exemplo primae editionis approbatam revocavimus. Novum concilium imperatorem voluisse cogere tradit Facundus lib. XII, c. 2 Ab hoc autem consilio eum S. Leo hoc loco removere studet, ne velut incerta retractentur, quae apud Chalcedonem firmata fuerant. Mox, quia et in illo concilio in Vallicell. codice et prima editione.
Quesnel: "si sanctam Chalcedonensem synodum.... firmatam", less well. Better in the earlier common editions, whose reading, approved by the Ratisbon and Vallicelliana manuscripts and the copy of the first edition, we have restored. Facundus, book XII, ch. 2, relates that the emperor wished to convene a new council. From this plan St Leo in this passage strives to turn him, lest what had been established at Chalcedon be reconsidered as though uncertain. Next, "quia et in illo concilio" in the Vallicelliana manuscript and the first edition.
(i) ‹prolata est,› (before aut addi) · printed under col 1113
Quesnellus delevit aut. Ex Vat. collect. 3, Vallic. collect. 8, Ratisp. collect. 19 et primae editions exemplo restituimus. Mox quidam codices cum antiquis edit. omittunt gloriosissime imperator.
Quesnel deleted "aut". We have restored it from the Vatican manuscript of collection 3, the Vallicelliana of collection 8, the Ratisbon of collection 19 and the copy of the first edition. Next, certain manuscripts, with the old editions, omit "gloriosissime imperator".
(j) ‹Hoc› (before autem) · printed under col 1113
Ratisp. delet autem.
The Ratisbon manuscript deletes "autem".
(k) ‹ante relatione› · printed under col 1113, running on under col 1114
Ratisp., cognovimus. Vercell., comperi. De molitionibus vero quae hic indicantur confer annot. 2 (Col. 112, n. n) in epistolam praedentem.
The Ratisbon manuscript: "cognovimus"; the Vercelli: "comperi". On the schemes indicated here, compare annotation 2 (col. 112 [sic], note n) on the preceding letter.
(l) ‹ex hoc› (before permiseritis) · printed under col 1114
Eutychiani scilicet ob mutationem imperatoris, opportunitatem, ut ait Leo epistola sequenti, se invenisse temporis aestimabant, quo sanctae synodi Chalcedonensis decreta cassarent; et idcirco, ut narrat Epiphanius Scholasticus in praefat. codicis encyclii, venientes ad Constantini regiam civitatem, infringi imperiali jussione ea quae Chalcedone bene sunt statuta, poscebant. Hanc tamen molitionem Augustus irritam reddidit; in ipso enim imperii exordio litteras dedit ad omnes metropolitanos, quibus praecessorum suorum, ac praesertim Marciani leges pro Chalcedonensi synodo editas confirmavit, uti tradunt Aegyptii episcopi catholici in libello ad eumdem imperatorem, qui legitur tom. IV Concil. Ven. edit. pag. 1837. his vero imperialibus litteris omnes metropolitas respondisse cum subscriptionibus episcoporum provinciae, quibus Chalcedonensem synodum, aeque ac anteriora concilia, ratam haberi affirmabant, discimus ex epistola episcoporum Syriae secundae ad eumdem Augustum tom. IV Concil. pag. 1864.
The Eutychians, that is, because of the change of emperor, thought that they had found, as Leo says in the following letter, an opportunity of time in which to annul the decrees of the holy synod of Chalcedon; and therefore, as Epiphanius Scholasticus relates in the preface to the Codex Encyclius, "coming to the royal city of Constantine, they demanded that what had been well decreed at Chalcedon be broken by imperial command". Yet the Augustus made this scheme vain; for at the very beginning of his reign he sent a letter to all the metropolitans, in which he confirmed the laws of his predecessors, and especially of Marcian, issued on behalf of the synod of Chalcedon, as the catholic bishops of Egypt relate in their petition to the same emperor, which is read in vol. IV of the Councils, Venice edition, p. 1837. And that all the metropolitans answered this imperial letter with the subscriptions of the bishops of their province, in which they affirmed that the synod of Chalcedon, just like the earlier councils, was held as valid, we learn from the letter of the bishops of Second Syria to the same Augustus, vol. IV of the Councils, p. 1864.
(m) ‹praedicationis› (before apostolicae) · printed under col 1114
Al. in antiquis vulg., evangelicae
Otherwise, in the old common editions, "evangelicae".
(n) ‹nulla› (before ulterius) · printed under col 1114
Duo codd. collect. 8 et exemplum primae edit., alterius possint accusatione convelli.
Two manuscripts of collection 8 and the copy of the first edition: "alterius possint accusatione convelli".
(o) ‹jubete› (before pontificem) · printed under col 1114
Proterii scilicet episcopi mortem et totam seriem Alexandrinorum tumultuum ex Anatolii relatione didicerat.
That is, he had learned the death of Bishop Proterius and the whole series of the Alexandrian tumults from the report of Anatolius.
(p) ‹in quo et› (before in actuum) · printed under col 1114
Ita cum antiquis editis nostri codd. Vat. collect. 3, Vallic. collect. 8, Ratisp. ac exemplum primae editionis. Quesnellus in actus. Dein perfectione pro professione in tribus nostris codicibus.
So, with the old editions, our manuscripts Vatican of collection 3, Vallicelliana of collection 8, Ratisbon, and the copy of the first edition. Quesnel: "in actus". Then "perfectione" for "professione" in three of our manuscripts.
(q) ‹Data› · printed under col 1114, running on under col 1115
Quesnellus, V idus Junii; in margine: Al., VI. Tillemontius not. 68 in Leonem errorem in mense detexit. Cum enim ex Anatolii relatione Leo Alexandrinorum tumultus perceperit, eodem tempore et ad imperatorem, et ad Anatolium scripsisse credi debet ita ut vel utraque epistola Junio mense data fuerit vel Juiol. Julium mensem praeferendum credidit quod V idus Julias pariter signetur epistola 147, ad Julianum, quae simul transmissa fuit. Sed codices desideravit qui hac in epistola Julium praeferrent. Nostri codices difficultatem solvunt. Soli enim codd. collect. 12, cum editis exinde derivatis, V idus Junias exhibent. At mss. collect. 3, 8, Ratisp. collect. 19 et Vat. Ottobon. collect. 23, ac exemplum primae editionis Julias notant. Solum in Vat. 1342 collect. 3, pro V idus legitur idibus Julias. Quidam ex his codd. pro Constantino habent Constante, sed perperam; consul enim hujus anni in inscriptionibus aliisque documentis Constantinus vocatur.
Quesnel: "V idus Junii"; in the margin: "Otherwise, VI". Tillemont, note 68 on Leo, detected an error in the month. For since Leo learned of the tumults of the Alexandrians from the report of Anatolius, he must be believed to have written at the same time both to the emperor and to Anatolius, so that either both letters were given in the month of June, or [both] in July. He thought the month of July preferable, because Letter 147, to Julian, which was sent at the same time, is likewise signed on the fifth day before the Ides of July. But he lacked manuscripts that presented July in this letter. Our manuscripts resolve the difficulty. For only the manuscripts of collection 12, with the editions derived from them, show "V idus Junias"; but the manuscripts of collections 3 and 8, the Ratisbon of collection 19 and the Vatican Ottoboni of collection 23, and the copy of the first edition, note "Julias". Only in Vatican 1342 of collection 3 is "idibus Julias" read for "V idus". Certain of these manuscripts have "Constante" for "Constantino", but wrongly; for the consul of this year is called Constantinus in inscriptions and other documents.
(q) continued from col 1114, set in n1114.
(a) ‹EPISTOLA› (CXLVI) · printed under col 1115
Alias 116. Scripta 11 Julii an. 457.
Otherwise 116. Written 11 July in the year 457.
(b) ‹AD ANATOLIUM EPISCOPUM CP. (call before the caption)› · printed under col 1115
Ex Grimanico editam cum Ratisponensi relegimus.
[This letter,] edited from the Grimani manuscript, we have read again with the Ratisbon manuscript.
(c) ‹sicut ipse indicas,› (before sponte) · printed under col 1115
Confer annot. 2 (Col. 1113, n. c) in epist. 145.
Compare annotation 2 (col. 1113, note c) on Letter 145.
(d) ‹Superest, ut› (before etiam) · printed under col 1115
Ex Ratisp. etiam adjecimus.
We have added "etiam" from the Ratisbon manuscript.
(e) ‹In quem autem› (before profectum) · printed under col 1116
Al., provectum.
Otherwise, "provectum".
SYONPSIS. — I. Haereticorum furore apud Alexandriam perpetrata in exidtum Chalcedonensis synodi tendere ex occasione mortis Marciani imp. — II. Se ad Leonem Aug. pro servandis synodi decretis scripsisse.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That the things perpetrated at Alexandria by the fury of the heretics, on the occasion of the death of the emperor Marcian, tend to the destruction of the synod of Chalcedon. — II. That he has written to Leo Augustus for the preservation of the synod's decrees.
(e) printed under this column; its call is in col 1115, set in n1115.
(f) ‹EPISTOLA› (CXLVII) · printed under col 1116
Alias 117. Scripta 11 Julii an. 457.
Otherwise 117. Written 11 July in the year 457.
(g) ‹AD JULIANUM EPISCOPUM COENSEM (call before the caption)› · printed under col 1116
Hanc quoque ex Grimanico vulgatam cum Ratisponensi contulimus.
This letter too, published from the Grimani manuscript, we have collated with the Ratisbon manuscript.
(h) ‹episcopo› (before et Aetio) · printed under col 1116
Ratispon. cod. omittit et Aetio nec non a pari. Solae Juliani litterae dudum acceptae initio indicantur, quibus Leo respondit epist. 144. Id Aetio convenire nequit, sicut nec ea convenire videntur, quibus de omissa opportunitate rescribendi queritur; neque enim tam frequens cum Aetio quam cum Juliano Leonis legato litterarum commercium fuit. Hinc de hac Grimanici codicis lectione vehementer ambigimus. Alia certe epistola ad Aetium hoc eodem in negotio, et fortassis per hoc idem tempus scripta desideratur cujus duo fragmenta in dissert. de epistolis deperditis ex Pelagii II litteris recitabimus.
The Ratisbon manuscript omits "et Aetio" and also "a pari". Only Julian's letter, received long before, is indicated at the beginning, to which Leo replied in Letter 144. That cannot fit Aetius, just as the complaint about the omitted opportunity of writing back does not seem to fit him either; for there was not so frequent an exchange of letters with Aetius as with Julian, Leo's legate. Hence we strongly doubt this reading of the Grimani manuscript. Certainly another letter to Aetius, written on this same business and perhaps at this same time, is lost, two fragments of which we shall cite from the letter of Pelagius II in the dissertation on the lost letters.
(i) ‹liceat quidquam› (before de illa) · printed under col 1116
Sic Ratisp. Al., ex illa.
So the Ratisbon manuscript. Otherwise, "ex illa".
SYNOPSIS. — I. De silentio conquestus curam ei Ecclesiae commendat. — II. Ut statuta synodi Chalcedonensis inconcussa permaneant, et Alexandriae catholicus episcopus eligatur.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Having complained of his silence, he commends to him the care of the Church. — II. That the statutes of the synod of Chalcedon should remain unshaken, and that a catholic bishop should be elected at Alexandria.