PL 54 · cols. 1125–1131
Leo the Great, Letters
Letters CLV–CLVI
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 1125–1131
Letters CLV–CLVI
(a) ‹ecclesiastica› · printed under col 1125
Forte legendum, potestate. QUESN.
Perhaps one should read potestate. QUESNEL.
(b) ‹EPISTOLA› · printed under col 1125
Alias 121. Scripta 11 Octob. an. 457.
Formerly 121. Written 11 October in the year 457.
(c) ‹AD ANATOLIUM› · printed under col 1125 (the call stands before the address line)
Exstat in mss. collect. 5, 11, 12, 21, 24 et in exemplo Sichardi. Quesnellus huic epistolae titulum praefixerat: De relatione contra Timotheum Alexandrinum. At cum nihil ejusmodi in ipsa epistola legatur, per errorem, ut credimus, is titulus huic epistolae appositus fuit, qui aequius convenit epistolae 157. Idem sane Quesnellus dissert. 1 ad annum 457, n. 5, hunc titulum in suo ms. legi prodidit, id est in Grimanico. Ex hoc autem codice edidit laudatam epistolam 157, qua S. Leo relationi quidem contra Timotheum ab Anatolio transmissae respondet. Epistola autem 155 in ms. Grimanico nequaquam invenitur.
It survives in the manuscripts of collections 5, 11, 12, 21 and 24 and in Sichard's copy. Quesnel had put this title before the letter: On the report against Timothy of Alexandria. But since nothing of the kind is read in the letter itself, this title was attached to this letter by mistake, we believe; it fits letter 157 more fairly. Quesnel himself, in dissertation 1, on the year 457, n. 5, reported that this title is read in his manuscript, that is, in the Grimani. From this manuscript he published letter 157, just mentioned, in which St Leo replies to the report against Timothy sent by Anatolius. Letter 155, however, is by no means found in the Grimani manuscript.
(d) ‹SYNOPSIS› · printed under col 1125 (the call stands before the synopsis)
In tabula collect. 5, c. 93, hic titulus legitur: Ad Anatolium episcopum de adhortatione expugnandae haeresis Eutychianae, et quod expulsos quosdam de Aegypto pro fide catholica ipse susceperit.
In the table of collection 5, ch. 93, this title is read: To Anatolius the bishop, on the exhortation to overcome the Eutychian heresy, and that he himself had received certain men expelled from Egypt for the catholic faith.
(e) ‹quantum Dominus› · printed under col 1125, running on under col 1126
Vulg. ante Quesn. cum mss. posteriorum collectionum et Sichardo, dat posse. Dein pro exorantes codd. Cantabrig. Quesnelli, et noster Vat. collect. 11 exhortantes.
The common editions before Quesnel, with the manuscripts of the later collections and Sichard, have dat posse. Then, for exorantes, Quesnel's Cambridge manuscripts and our Vatican manuscript of collection 11 have exhortantes.
(f) ‹principis fides, quem› · printed under col 1126
Hic epistola ad imperatorem indicatur, quae per Olympium paulo ante laudatum missa traditur epist. 158, ac propterea una cum his ad Anatolium litteris transmissa fuit.
Here a letter to the emperor is indicated, which in letter 158 is said to have been sent by the Olympius mentioned a little before, and was therefore sent together with this letter to Anatolius.
(g) ‹constantia faciat› · printed under col 1126
Codd. collect. 11 et 21, obviare.
The manuscripts of collections 11 and 21 have obviare.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Eum ad vigilantiam contra haereticorum conatus incitat. — II. Conniventiam clericorum Constantinop. arguit, circa quos vigorem in Anatolio desiderat pastoralem.
SYNOPSIS. — I. He stirs him to vigilance against the attempts of the heretics. — II. He rebukes the connivance of the clergy of Constantinople, towards whom he wants pastoral vigour in Anatolius.
(e) continued from col 1125, set in n1125.
(f) printed under this column; its call is in col 1125, set in n1125. (g) printed under this column; its call is in col 1125, set in n1125.
(h) ‹principe, et› · printed under col 1126
Mss. collect. 11 et 24 cum Sichardo, a tua fraternitate: forte melius.
The manuscripts of collections 11 and 24, with Sichard, have a tua fraternitate: perhaps better.
(i) ‹ad ipsos quoque› · printed under col 1126
Epist. 154.
Letter 154.
(j) ‹quae illos› · printed under col 1126
Duo codd. collect. 21, possent.
Two manuscripts of collection 21 have possent.
(k) ‹illos cum› · printed under col 1126
Vulg. ante Quesn. cum Sichardo delent omni.
The common editions before Quesnel, with Sichard, delete omni.
(l) ‹CAP. II. —› · printed under col 1126
24, qu. 2. Illud autem sane, c. †34.
24, qu. 2, Illud autem sane, c. 34 [the last figure uncertain].
(m) ‹inter dilectionis tuae› · printed under col 1126
Atticum respici, de quo ad Anatolium scripserat kal. Septembris epist. 151.
Atticus is meant, about whom he had written to Anatolius on the kalends of September, letter 151.
(n) ‹quia melius sit› · printed under col 1126
Quesnellus et noster Vindobon. cod. collect. 5, his in Ecclesia officiis carere membrorum. Anteriorum editorum lectionem aliis codd. et Sichardi exemplo confirmatam, uti aptiorem restituimus.
Quesnel and our Vienna manuscript of collection 5 have his in Ecclesia officiis carere membrorum. We have restored the reading of the earlier editors, confirmed by other manuscripts and by Sichard's copy, as more fitting.
(a) ‹nec orandi. Data› · the call stands in col 1128 (the end of Letter CLV, set under the 1127 rail); the note is printed under col 1127 above the admonition, running on under col 1128
Vulg. antiquiores cum ms. Vat. collect. 24 ac Sichardo, pridie idus, et in margine, quinto idus. Verior haec chronica nota, quam cum mss. Quesnelli nostri etiam codd. praestantiorum collect. 5, 11 et 21 praeferunt; congruit enim cum die signato in epistola praecedenti, quae in hac indicatur cap. 1, et una cum hac transmissa cognoscitur. Facile porro fuit ex v idus librariorum lapsu litteram v disjunctis lateribus in duas unitates convertere, et scribere II idus ut in codd. collect. 24 haec dies signatur, non vero, ut in editis, Pridie idus.
The older common editions, with the Vatican manuscript of collection 24 and Sichard, have pridie idus, and in the margin quinto idus. This latter date is truer, which, with Quesnel's manuscripts, our manuscripts of the better collections 5, 11 and 21 also present; for it agrees with the day marked in the preceding letter, which is indicated in this one, ch. 1, and is known to have been sent together with it. Moreover, it was easy, by a slip of the copyists, to turn the letter v of v idus, its sides separated, into two units and to write II idus, as this day is marked in the manuscripts of collection 24, and not, as in the printed editions, Pridie idus.
(a) ‹EPISTOLA› (of Letter CLVI; a second note lettered (a) on this page) · printed under col 1127 at the foot of the page
Alias 125. Scripta 1 Decemb. an. 45⟨7⟩.
Formerly 125. Written 1 December in the year 457.
(b) ‹in eo quod› · printed under col 1127
Haec, quae non leguntur in litteris ad Anatolium in Admonitione indicatis, erant procul dubio in peculiari imperatoris ad Leonem epistola.
These words, which are not read in the letter to Anatolius indicated in the Admonition, were without doubt in the emperor's own letter to Leo.
(c) ‹obedire,› · printed under col 1127
Vulg. Leonis ante Quesn. cum mss. Vat. et Veneto collect. 12, ut majori fructu conspectum. Duo codd. Baluzii, ut fructu majorem conspectu.
The common editions of Leo before Quesnel, with the Vatican and Venetian manuscripts of collection 12, have ut majori fructu conspectum. Two of Baluze's manuscripts have ut fructu majorem conspectu.
(d) printed under this column, running on under col 1128; its call is in col 1128, set in n1128.
ADMONITIO IN EPISTOLAM SEQUENTEM
ADMONITION ON THE FOLLOWING LETTER
1. Sequens epistola edita fuit a Merlino ex ms. collect. 12. Quesnellus eam relegit cum ms. Grim. collect. 18. Cum vero haec eadem epistola inserta fuerit codici encyclio, qui Leone vivente Graece scriptus fuit, nisi hic codex originalis periisset, hanc S. Leonis epistolam Graece redditam haberemus. At exstat hujus codicis Latina interpretatio, quam Epiphanius Scholasticus lucubravit. Hic autem cum nactus fuisset Leoninae epistolae Latinum exemplar, hoc suae versioni inseruit; et idcirco ex hoc codice, quem a Surio editum Baluzius cum duobus mss. Bellovacensi et Corbeiensi contulit, aliquot variantes suppetunt, quae nobis utiles fuere.
1. The following letter was published by Merlin from a manuscript of collection 12. Quesnel re-read it with the Grimani manuscript of collection 18. But since this same letter was inserted in the Codex Encyclius, which was written in Greek in Leo's lifetime, we should have this letter of St Leo rendered in Greek, had that original codex not perished. There survives, however, a Latin translation of this codex, which Epiphanius Scholasticus worked out. He, having come upon a Latin copy of Leo's letter, inserted it into his version; and therefore from this codex, which Baluze collated, as published by Surius, with two manuscripts, of Beauvais and of Corbie, some variants are available which have been useful to us.
2. Huic epistolae causam dederunt imperatoris Leonis litterae, quas ob Alexandrinos tumultus ad universos metropolitas tradidit. In laudato codice encyclio, cujus ordo, ut in mss. exstat, ex Baluzio profertur tom. V Concil. Venetae edit. pag. 33 et seqq. cap. 6, describitur imperatoris epistola ad Anatolium Constantinopolitanum; et postea cap. 11 subjiciuntur caeterorum episcoporum nomina, ad quos litterae similes directae fuerunt, ac inter hos primo datae dicuntur Leoni reverentissimo urbis Romae pontifici. Imperialis epistola ad Anatolium cum quaedam ejusdem Constantinopolitani episcopi peculiaria continet, tum vero alia Leonis papae propria, quae eidem inserta erant (vide annot 1 [Infra, n. b]) omittit; ac propterea eadem omnino ad Leonem pontificem transmissa dici nequit: unde huic editioni inserenda non fuit. Nihilo tamen minus quid Augusti litterae a Leone papa similiter peterent, satis exinde cognoscitur. Promoto scilicet ab Eutychianis ad Alexandrinam sedem Timotheo Aeluro, et occiso S. Proterio, maximoque tumultu inter Eutychianos et catholicos Aegyptios excitato, utrique cum libellis supplicibus ad imperatorem confugerunt. Utrosque libellos Leo Augustus cum suis litteris ad omnes metropolitanos, et potissimum ad Romanum pontificem misit, petens ut concilium cogerent, ibique de praedicto Timotheo, inquit, et de Chalcedonensi concilio, quid in commune sapitis, sine quolibet humano terrore, et absque gratia cujuscumque vel odio... cum omni celeritate meam facite cognoscere pietatem. Leo papa primus omnium sequentem epistolam rescripsit, cap. 10, eaque in codice encyclio statim post indicata episcoporum nomina primo loco describitur cap. 12. ut Evagrius testatur lib. II.
2. The occasion of this letter was given by the letter of the emperor Leo which he issued to all the metropolitans because of the Alexandrian disturbances. In the Codex Encyclius already mentioned, whose arrangement, as it stands in the manuscripts, is set out from Baluze in vol. V of the Councils, Venice edition, p. 33 and following, in ch. 6 the emperor's letter to Anatolius of Constantinople is copied; and afterwards, in ch. 11, the names of the other bishops to whom similar letters were sent are appended, and among these the letter is said to have been given first to Leo, most reverend pontiff of the city of Rome. The imperial letter to Anatolius, while it contains certain things peculiar to that bishop of Constantinople, omits other things proper to Pope Leo, which had been inserted in his letter (see annotation 1 [below, n. b]); and therefore it cannot be said to have been sent to the pontiff Leo in exactly the same form: hence it was not to be inserted in this edition. Nevertheless, what the Augustus's letter likewise asked of Pope Leo is sufficiently known from it. That is to say, when Timothy Aelurus had been promoted by the Eutychians to the see of Alexandria, and St Proterius had been killed, and a very great disturbance had been stirred up between the Eutychians and the catholic Egyptians, both parties fled to the emperor with petitions. Leo Augustus sent both petitions with his own letter to all the metropolitans, and above all to the Roman pontiff, asking that they assemble a council, and there, he says, "make known to my Piety with all speed what you think in common about the aforesaid Timothy and about the council of Chalcedon, without any human fear, and without favour or hatred of anyone ..." Pope Leo, first of all, wrote the following letter in reply, ch. 10, and in the Codex Encyclius it is copied in the first place, immediately after the names of the bishops indicated, ch. 12, as Evagrius testifies, book II.
3. Ex his autem cognoscitur error Pagii, qui has pontificis litteras imperialibus encyclicis redditas negavit ad an. 457, n. 11. Cum enim hae litterae pontificis codici encyclio inserantur, has non minus quam caeteras aliorum episcoporum in eodem codice contentas imperiali epistolae encyclicae rescriptas agnoscimus. Hinc etiam c. 4 mentio fit exemplarium precum catholicorum Eutychianorum, quae una cum imperialibus litteris transmissae in eodem codice encyclio exhibentur cap. 7 et 9. Imperatoris epistola circa Octobrem an. 457 per magistrianos ad universos metropolitas celerrime directa fuit. Hinc duo episcopi Agapitus Rhodius pag. 1892, et Lucas Dyrrachenus pag. 1297, se eas litteras hieme recepisse subindicant. Quod si Marcellianus comes in Chronico ad an. 458, et Augusti litteras et episcoporum responsa commemorat, id ea de causa accidit, quod licet imperialis encyclica missa fuerit an. 457, pleraque tamen responsa nonnisi an. 458 pervenere, unde Varadati monachi epistola (pag. 1934) die 27 Augusti signatur. Ita nihili est cur sequentem Leonis epistolam imperiali encyclicae redditam dubitemus.
3. From this, moreover, is recognized the error of Pagi, who, at the year 457, n. 11, denied that this letter of the pontiff was a reply to the imperial encyclical. For since this letter of the pontiff is inserted in the Codex Encyclius, we recognize that it, no less than the other letters of other bishops contained in the same codex, was written in reply to the imperial encyclical letter. Hence also in ch. 4 mention is made of the copies of the petitions of the catholics [and] the Eutychians, which, sent together with the imperial letter, are shown in the same Codex Encyclius, ch. 7 and 9. The emperor's letter was sent with the greatest speed by the magistriani to all the metropolitans about October of the year 457. Hence two bishops, Agapitus of Rhodes, p. 1892, and Lucas of Dyrrachium, p. 1297, hint that they received that letter in winter. And if Count Marcellinus in his Chronicle at the year 458 mentions both the Augustus's letter and the replies of the bishops, that happened for this reason: that although the imperial encyclical was sent in the year 457, most of the replies arrived only in the year 458; hence the letter of the monk Varadatus (p. 1934) is dated on 27 August. So there is no reason why we should doubt that the following letter of Leo was a reply to the imperial encyclical.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Post Chalcedonensem synodum nihil esse denuo tractandum circa fidem. — II. Antichristum eum esse qui veritatem ab Ecclesia declaratam rursus examinat. — III. Parricidas Alexandrini episcopi Ecclesiae praesidere nefas esse. — IV. Preces Leoni Augusto oblatae tam a catholicis quam ab haereticis, in quo differant. — V. Omnia Christianae religionis officia et mysteria apud Alexandriam esse intercepta. — VI. Scripta de fide prolixiora promittit, Anatolii incuriam taxat, catholicos commendat.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That after the synod of Chalcedon nothing is to be treated anew concerning the faith. — II. That he is Antichrist who examines again the truth declared by the Church. — III. That it is wrong for the murderers of the bishop of Alexandria to preside over the Church. — IV. In what the petitions offered to Leo Augustus by the catholics and by the heretics differ. — V. That all the offices and mysteries of the Christian religion have been cut off at Alexandria. — VI. He promises fuller writings on the faith, censures the negligence of Anatolius, commends the catholics.
(a) its call (at "Data", the end of Letter CLV, printed at the head of this column) is set with that text under the 1127 rail; the note is printed under col 1127 and runs on under this column; set in n1127.
(d) ‹inhaerere: ipsi› · printed under col 1127, running on under col 1128
Ita cum ms. Grim. Quesnelli nostri codd. et editio codicis encyclii, atque Facundus. Anteriores editiones Leonis, quomodo videbimur statuta velle convellere.
So, with Quesnel's Grimani manuscript, our manuscripts and the edition of the Codex Encyclius, and Facundus. The earlier editions of Leo have quomodo videbimur statuta velle convellere.
(e) ‹atque ita nullum› · printed under col 1128
Sic Grim. et nostri codd. cum Facundo. Edit. antiq. Leonis, corrigendis. Codex encyclius, colligendis.
So the Grimani and our manuscripts, with Facundus. The old editions of Leo have corrigendis. The Codex Encyclius has colligendis.
(f) ‹suscepta est, nihil› · printed under col 1128
Al. cum mss. collect. 12, ad confirmationem.
Others, with the manuscripts of collection 12, have ad confirmationem.
(none; the full-width ADMONITIO on this page is set in n1127, in reading order)
(a) ‹Petrus voce Domini› (before dicentis) · printed under col 1129
Vocem dicentis supplevimus ex duobus nostris mss. collect. 12 et codice encyclio.
We have supplied the word dicentis from our two manuscripts of collection 12 and from the Codex encyclius.
(b) ‹audeat inexpugnabilem› (before firmitatem) · printed under col 1129
Editi Leonis ante Quesn., nullo nostro codice opitulante, veritatem.
The editions of Leo before Quesnel, with none of our manuscripts supporting them, veritatem.
(c) ‹seminare? Atque› (before contemnenda) · printed under col 1129
Duo mss. collect. 12, in contemnenda. Duo Baluzii codicis encyclii, contemnendum atque vitandum.... perscripsit.
Two manuscripts of collection 12, in contemnenda. Two [copies] of Baluze's Codex encyclius, contemnendum atque vitandum.... perscripsit.
(d) ‹synodum retractari cupiunt› (before disceretur) · printed under col 1129
Codd. Baluzii, docerentur.
Baluze's manuscripts, docerentur.
(e) ‹qui ipsi se› (at ipsi; the call is not printed) · printed under col 1129
Vulg. cum mss. collect. 12 et Surii exemplo omittunt ipsi. Quesnellus ex suo ms. adjecit cui favent exemplaria Baluzii.
The common editions, with the manuscripts of collection 12 and Surius's copy, omit ipsi. Quesnel added it from his manuscript, and Baluze's copies support it.
(f) printed under this column; its call is in col 1130, set in n1130 (g) printed under this column; its call is in col 1130, set in n1130 (h) printed under this column (running over under col 1130); its call is in col 1130, set in n1130
(f) ‹agere, quos constat› (before fidem) · printed under col 1129
Antiquae editiones Leonis, a fide deviare.
The old editions of Leo, a fide deviare.
(g) ‹regiam potestatem tibi› (before non ad solum) · printed under col 1129
Sic nostri codd. collect. 12 et mss. Baluzii Al., non solum ad mundi regimen.
So our manuscripts of collection 12 and Baluze's manuscripts. Others, non solum ad mundi regimen.
(h) ‹Dei iracundia mitigata› (before religiosae) · printed under col 1129, running over under col 1130
Editi antiquiores Leonis et codicis encyclii, regiae civitati non retribuat, quae antea admissa sunt. Emendationem Quesnelli nostra et Baluzii exemplaria approbant.
The older editions of Leo and of the Codex encyclius, regiae civitati non retribuat, quae antea admissa sunt. Our copies and Baluze's approve Quesnel's emendation.
(i) ‹specialius ambiunt› (before quia) · printed under col 1130
Vulg., qui. Correximus ex utrisque Baluzii codicibus.
The common editions, qui. We have corrected it from both of Baluze's manuscripts.
(j) ‹uti sua› (before pervasione) · printed under col 1130
Iidem Vulg., persuasione. Ms. Bellovac., perversione. Melius in Corbeien. Baluzii codice, quem secuti sumus.
The same common editions, persuasione. The Beauvais manuscript, perversione. Better in Baluze's Corbie manuscript, which we have followed.
(k) ‹christiano nomine mereantur› (before abscindi) · printed under col 1130
Al., abscidi.
Others, abscidi.
(l) ‹preces, quarum› (before exemplaria) · printed under col 1130
Haec tum catholicorum tum haereticorum exemplaria precum leguntur in codice encyclio tom. IV Concil pag. 1837 et 1848. Catholicorum precibus subscripti sunt episcopi quatuordecim, quatuor presbyteri et duo diaconi.
These copies of the petitions, both of the catholics and of the heretics, are read in the Codex encyclius, vol. IV of the Councils, pp. 1837 and 1848. Fourteen bishops, four priests and two deacons subscribed the petitions of the catholics.
(m) ‹sub incerto confusae› (before universitatis) · printed under col 1130
Editi antiqui Leonis cum mss. collect. 12, unitatis. Libellus haereticorum in laudato codice encyclio subscriptionibus caret.
The old editions of Leo, with the manuscripts of collection 12, unitatis. The heretics' petition in the Codex encyclius cited lacks subscriptions.
(n) ‹profiteri metuunt, qui› (before meruere) · printed under col 1130
Codd. Baluzii, metuere.
Baluze's manuscripts, metuere.
(a) ‹quod non licuit› (before audiri) · printed under col 1131
Sic omnes nostri et Baluzii cod., nec non Vulgati ante Quesn., apud quem, auderi.
So all our manuscripts and Baluze's, and also the common editions before Quesnel; in him, auderi.
(b) ‹spelunca nunc sit latronum?› (before Manifestum) · printed under col 1131
1, qu. 1, Manifestum est crudel., c. 69.
1, qu. 1, Manifestum est crudel., c. 69.
(c) ‹per crudelissimam› (before insanissimamque) · printed under col 1131
Edit. codicis encyclii, immanissimamque vesaniam. Mss. Baluzii, insanissimamque vesaniam.
The edition of the Codex encyclius, immanissimamque vesaniam. Baluze's manuscripts, insanissimamque vesaniam.
(d) ‹quid de his› (before decernendum) · printed under col 1131
Eadem mss., dicendum sit, et dein, sacratissimi sacerdotis: ac postea, in contumelia.
The same manuscripts, dicendum sit, and then, sacratissimi sacerdotis; and afterwards, in contumelia.
(e) ‹in nimiam longitudinem tenderetur› (before aliis) · printed under col 1131
Epist. 165, al. 134.
Letter 165, otherwise 134.
(f) ‹viscera assertionibus suis› (before haereticos) · printed under col 1131
Alias editiones Leonis antiquae, haereticorum partem adjuvantes. Atticum presbyterum intelligit, de quo epistola sequenti.
Otherwise the old editions of Leo, haereticorum partem adjuvantes. He means the priest Atticus, of whom [he speaks] in the following letter.
(g) printed under this column; its call is in col 1132, set in n1132 (h) printed under this column; its call is in col 1132, set in n1132 (i) printed under this column; its call is in col 1132, set in n1132 (j) printed under this column (running over under col 1132); its call is in col 1132, set in n1132