Migne Reading Room

PL 54 · cols. 677–694

Leo the Great, Letters

Letter XV

PL 54:677
Discipuli enim sum humilis et mitis magistri, dicentis: Discite a me quia mitis sum et humilis corde; et invenietis requiem animabus vestris. Jugum enim meum suave est, et onus meum leve (Matth. XI, 29, 30). Quod modo experiemur, nisi et illud in observantia veniat, quod idem Dominus ait? Qui major est vestrum, erit minister vester. Qui autem se exaltaverit, humiliabitur; et qui se humiliat exaltabitur (Matth. XX, 26; Marc. X, 43; Luc. XXII, 26; Luc. XIV, 11).
For we are disciples of a humble and meek Master, Who says: Learn of Me, for I am meek and humble of heart; and you will find rest for your souls. For My yoke is sweet and My burden light (Matt. 11:29, 30). And how shall we experience this, unless that also comes into observance which the same Lord says? He who is greater among you shall be your servant. But whoever exalts himself shall be humbled; and he who humbles himself shall be exalted (Matt. 20:26; Mark 10:43; Luke 22:26; Luke 14:11).
EPISTOLA XV.
LETTER XV.
AD TURRIBIUM ASTURICENSEM EPISCOPUM.
TO TURRIBIUS, BISHOP OF ASTORGA.
De Priscillianistarum erroribus.
On the errors of the Priscillianists.
Editors' notes and page, col. 677

Footnotes

(a) ‹qui se› · printed under col 677

Ms. Vindeb. collect. 5, humiliaverit.

The Vienna manuscript of collection 5, humiliaverit.

(b) ‹EPISTOLA XV.› · printed under col 677

Scripta 21 Julii an. 447.

Written 21 July in the year 447.

(c) ‹AD TURRIBIUM› · printed under col 677

Haec epistola exstat in mss. collect. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, Hisp., Isid. 11, 12, 18 et 20 usque ad 24. Eamdem relegimus ad codices cujuscumque collectionis, exceptis 2 et 18, quibus Quesnellus usus est. Praecipue autem memorandi sunt codd. Vat. Reg. collect. 1, Vat. collect. 3, Vindebon. collect. 5 et Vaticanus 5845, qui in additionibus continet collectionem 8 cum hi mira antiquitate et raritate caeteris praestent. Turribii porro nomen quam varie scribatur in mss. vide not. 1 Quesnelli.

This letter is extant in the manuscripts of collections 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, the Spanish, the Isidorian, 11, 12, 18, and 20 to 24. We have read it again against manuscripts of every collection, except 2 and 18, which Quesnel used. Especially to be mentioned are the manuscripts Vatican Regina of collection 1, the Vatican of collection 3, the Vienna of collection 5 and Vatican 5845, which contains collection 8 in its additions, since these surpass the others in remarkable antiquity and rarity. How variously, moreover, the name of Turribius is written in the manuscripts, see Quesnel's note 1.

(d) ‹De Priscillianistarum erroribus.› · printed under col 677

Confer Aug. haer. 70 et concilii Bracar. 1 canones.

Compare Augustine, On Heresies 70, and the canons of the first council of Braga.

(e) ‹SYNOPSIS› · printed under cols 677–678

Vulgatorum titulos qui ex collectione Hispanica derivant, ad codicum lectionem revocavimus. In tabula autem collect. 5, num. 71, quam ex Thuaneo codice Quesnellus edidit, hi tituli leguntur: Constitutio ad Turbium episcopum Asturensem super sexdecim capitulorum consulta Priscillianistarum blasphemiis in octodecim respondens capitulis; id est: I. Quod et Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti unam asserunt esse personam. II De processionibus quarumdam virtutum ex Deo, quas habere coeperit, et quas essentia sui ipsa processerit. III. Ideo unigenitum dici Filium Dei, quia solus sit natus ex virgine. IV. Quod natale Christi honorare se simulent. V. Quod animam hominis divinae asserant esse substantiae. VI. Quod diabolus nunqnam fuerit bonus, nec natura ejus opificium Dei sit. VII. Quod nuptias damnent, et procreationem nascentium perhorrescant. VIII. Quod humana corpora in mulierum uteris in conceptione seminum daemonum opere figurentur. IX. Quod promissionum filii ex mulieribus quidem nati, sed ex Spiritu sancto concepti sint. X. Animas hominum, antequam insererentur humanis corporibus, fuisse in corpore, et in coelesti habitatione peccasse. XI. Quod fatalibus stellis et animas hominum et corpora astringant. XII. Quod sub aliis potestatibus partes animae, sub aliis corporis sint membra. XIII. Quod omne corpus Scripturarum canonicarum sub patriarcharum nominibus accipiendum sit. XIV. Statum corporis sub potestate siderum atque signorum pro terrena qualitate teneri. XV. Quod multos codices detestandae perfidiae praesumptione diabolica canonicos esse simulata titulaverint veritate: quodque ea quae extra canonicas Scripturas reperta fuerint, igne debeant concremari. XVI. De tractatibus Dictinii abjiciendis. XVII. De his sacerdotibus qui errantibus non resistunt. XVIII. Si descendente ad inferna Christo, caro ejus requieverit in sepulcro.

The titles of the common editions, which derive from the Spanish collection, we have brought back to the reading of the manuscripts. But in the table of collection 5, number 71, which Quesnel published from the de Thou manuscript, these titles are read: A constitution to Turbius, bishop of Astorga, on the inquiries of sixteen chapters, replying in eighteen chapters to the blasphemies of the Priscillianists; that is: I. That they assert that there is one person of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. II. On the processions of certain powers from God, which He began to have, and which He by His own essence put forth. III. That the Son of God is called only-begotten because He alone was born of a virgin. IV. That they pretend to honour the birthday of Christ. V. That they assert that the soul of man is of the divine substance. VI. That the devil was never good, and that his nature is not the handiwork of God. VII. That they condemn marriage and shudder at the begetting of those who are born. VIII. That human bodies are shaped in the wombs of women, at the conception of the seeds, by the work of demons. IX. That the sons of the promises were born indeed of women but conceived of the Holy Spirit. X. That the souls of men, before they were put into human bodies, were in a body and sinned in the heavenly dwelling. XI. That they bind both the souls and the bodies of men to the fateful stars. XII. That the parts of the soul are under some powers, the members of the body under others. XIII. That the whole body of the canonical Scriptures is to be understood under the names of the patriarchs. XIV. That the state of the body is held under the power of the stars and signs according to its earthly quality. XV. That with devilish presumption they have entitled many manuscripts of detestable faithlessness canonical, with a feigned truth: and that those things which are found outside the canonical Scriptures ought to be burnt with fire. XVI. On rejecting the treatises of Dictinius. XVII. On those priests who do not resist those in error. XVIII. Whether, when Christ descended to the lower world, His flesh rested in the tomb.

Editors' prose

SYNOPSIS (Ex collectione Hispanica). — I. Contra Priscillianistas, qui sanctam Trinitatem, non personis, sed tantum nominibus distinguunt. — II. Adversus id quod Dei Filium posteriorem fuisse credunt quam Patrem. — III. Adversus id quod dicunt ideo unigenitum dici Christum, quia solus sit de virgine natus. — IV. De Natali Domini, quod in eo Priscillianistae jejunia celebrent. — V. Adversus id quod aiunt animam hominis ex divina esse substantia. — VI. Contra id quod aiunt diabolum ex se vel ex chao esse, et proprium [Quesn. et unus noster codd. addunt non] habere naturam. — VIII. Contra illud quod nuptias et procreationes filiorum astruant

SYNOPSIS (from the Spanish collection). — I. Against the Priscillianists, who distinguish the holy Trinity not by persons but only by names. — II. Against their belief that the Son of God was later than the Father. — III. Against their saying that Christ is called only-begotten because He alone was born of a virgin. — IV. On the Nativity of the Lord, that the Priscillianists keep fasts on it. — V. Against their saying that the soul of man is of the divine substance. — VI. Against their saying that the devil is from himself or from chaos, and has [Quesnel and one of our manuscripts add not] a nature of his own. — VIII [VII]. Against their claim that marriage and the begetting of children […]

Page

  • running head: 677 EPISTOLA X… (the rest across the page, over col 678, "…TOLA XV.")
  • marginal letters: A ‹Discipuli enim sum›; B ‹sonis, sed tantum nominibus› (in the synopsis); C (in the footnotes) ‹canus 5845›; D (in the footnotes, beside col 678's notes) ‹Mox in Vat. Hisp.›
  • old-edition numerals: 693 before ‹(b) EPISTOLA XV.›
  • signature: none
  • other: Letter XIV ends in col 677 with no date line; the heading of Letter XV (number, address, title) is printed across col 677 only, then the synopsis (continued in col 678, in n678). The synopsis numbers its seventh item "VIII" (listed as a misprint); in (e) "nunqnam" is printed with a turned n (listed)
PL 54:678
LEO episcopus TURRIBIO episcopo salutem.
Leo, bishop, to Turribius, bishop, greeting.
Quam laudabiliter pro catholicae fidei veritate movearis, et quam sollicite Dominico gregi devotionem officii pastoralis impendas, tradita nobis per diaconem tuum fraternitatis tuae scripta demonstrant, quibus notitiae nostrae insinuare curasti, qualis in regionibus vestris de antiquae pestilentiae reliquiis errorum morbus exarserit. Nam et epistolae sermo, et commonitorii series, et libelli tui textus eloquitur Priscillianistarum fetidissimam apud vos
How praiseworthily you are stirred on behalf of the truth of the catholic faith, and how carefully you spend the devotion of the pastoral office upon the Lord's flock, is shown by the writings of your fraternity delivered to us by your deacon, in which you have taken care to bring to our notice what a disease of errors has flared up in your regions from the remnants of an ancient pestilence. For the wording of your letter, and the course of your memorandum, and the text of your pamphlet all declare that the most fetid bilge-water of the Priscillianists has among you […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 678

Footnotes

(e) continued from col 677, set in n677.

(f) ‹XIII› (in the synopsis) · printed under col 678

Cum in editis hic titulus deesset, illum ex ingenio supplevit Quesnellus sic: Contra id quod Scripturarum scientiam subvertunt. Nos ipsum collectionis Hispanicae titulum ex mss. expressimus.

Since this title was lacking in the editions, Quesnel supplied it from his own ingenuity thus: Contra id quod Scripturarum scientiam subvertunt [Against their overturning the knowledge of the Scriptures]. We have printed the very title of the Spanish collection from the manuscripts.

(g) ‹XVI.› (in the synopsis) · printed under col 678

Ita cum editis unus noster codex. Caeteri perperam: Emendanda de libro Turribii episcopi. Cod. Vindebon. Hisp. pro episcopi habet episcopus sanctus.

So, with the editions, one manuscript of ours. The others wrongly: Emendanda de libro Turribii episcopi. The Vienna Spanish manuscript has episcopus sanctus for episcopi.

(h) ‹TURRIBIO episcopo› · printed under col 678

Cod. Vindebon. collect. 5 addit Asturiensi, legendum Asturicensi; et delet salutem.

The Vienna manuscript of collection 5 adds Asturiensi, to be read Asturicensi; and deletes salutem.

(i) ‹tradita nobis per› · printed under col 678

Hunc Pervincum nominari ab Idatio in Chronico, Quesnellus in margine animadvertit. In cod. Vindebon. Hisp. nominis proprii signum distinguitur.

Quesnel remarked in the margin that this man is named Pervincus by Idatius in his Chronicle. In the Vienna Spanish manuscript the mark of a proper name is distinguished.

(j) ‹in regionibus vestris› · printed under col 678

Duo codices et editi ante Quesn., de antiquis. Mox in Vat. Hisp., error vel morbus pro errorum morbus.

Two manuscripts and the editions before Quesnel, de antiquis. Shortly after, in the Vatican Spanish, error vel morbus for errorum morbus.

(k) ‹Nam et› · printed under col 678

Vide not. 2 Quesn., qui mox ex mss. edidit eloquitur, cum antea ex solis codd. collect. 24 legeretur demonstrant.

See Quesnel's note 2, who shortly after printed eloquitur from the manuscripts, whereas before, from the manuscripts of collection 24 alone, demonstrant was read.

(l) ‹textus eloquitur› · printed under cols 678–679

Vide not. 3 Quesn. Mox pro fetidissimam, alias foedissimam. Porro sententiam pro sentinam habent quidem plerique nostri codices collect. 1, 3, 8. Vat., Hisp. et Isid., cum mss. collect. 21, quibus etiam accedunt codices Corb. collect. 2 et Griman. collect. 18 a Quesnello laudati eadem nota 3. Nihilo tamen minus lectionem sentinam praeferunt non solum omnes vulgati, sed etiam nostri mss. libri collect. 5, 11, 12, 24, nec non ipse codex Grimanicus collect. 18 prima manu, ut idem Quesnellus fatetur, ac praecipue Vindebonensis puram continens collectionem Hispanicam, quae hanc epistolam in Hispaniam missam e puriori fonte hausisse credenda est. Hinc ab hac vulgata lectione haud discedendum credidimus, cum praesertim adjectivum fetidissimam, et sequens contextus, sentinae magis congruat quam sententiae.

See Quesnel's note 3. Shortly after, for fetidissimam, elsewhere foedissimam. Further, sententiam [opinion] for sentinam [bilge-water] is indeed in most of our manuscripts, of collections 1, 3, 8, the Vatican Spanish and Isidorian, with the manuscripts of collection 21, to which are added also the Corbie manuscript of collection 2 and the Grimani manuscript of collection 18, cited by Quesnel in the same note 3. Nevertheless the reading sentinam is offered not only by all the common editions, but also by our manuscript books of collections 5, 11, 12, 24, and also by the Grimani manuscript of collection 18 itself in the first hand, as Quesnel himself admits, and especially by the Vienna one containing the pure Spanish collection, which must be believed to have drawn this letter, sent into Spain, from a purer source. Hence we have thought that one should not depart from this common reading, especially since the adjective fetidissimam and the following context suit sentinae better than sententiae.

Editors' prose

esse peccatum. — VIII. Contra id quod corpora humana diaboli dicunt esse figmenta, et a daemonibus in utero formari. — IX. Contra id quod filios repromissionis ex Spiritu sancto dicunt esse conceptos. — X. Contra id quod animas in coelestibus peccare credunt [Al. dicunt], et secundum qualitatem peccati in hoc mundo accipere sortem vel bonam vel malam. — XI. Contra id quod fatalibus stellis dicunt animas hominum obligatas. — XII. Contra id quod sub aliis potestatibus partes animae, sub aliis corporis membra describunt. — XIII Contra id quod patriarcharum nomina per singula corporis membra disponunt [Al. describunt. — XIV. Contra id quod duodecim signa, quae mathematici observant, per corpus omne distinguunt. — XV. De apocryphis scripturis eorumdem Priscillianorum. — XVI. De libro Dictinii [Al. Dictionii].

[…] are a sin. — VIII. Against their saying that human bodies are the devil's fashionings, and are formed in the womb by demons. — IX. Against their saying that the sons of the promise were conceived of the Holy Spirit. — X. Against their belief [elsewhere: saying] that souls sin in the heavenly places, and according to the quality of the sin receive in this world a lot either good or bad. — XI. Against their saying that the souls of men are bound to the fateful stars. — XII. Against their assigning the parts of the soul to some powers and the members of the body to others. — XIII. Against their distributing [elsewhere: assigning] the names of the patriarchs over the several members of the body. — XIV. Against their distributing the twelve signs, which the astrologers observe, over the whole body. — XV. On the apocryphal scriptures of these same Priscillianists. — XVI. On the book of Dictinius [elsewhere: Dictionius].

Page

  • running head: …TOLA XV. 678 (across the page from col 677, "EPISTOLA X…")
  • marginal letters: A ‹esse peccatum. — VIII.› (in the synopsis); B ‹Quam laudabiliter pro catholicae›; C (in the footnotes) ‹turas reperta fuerint›; D (in the footnotes) ‹Mox in Vat. Hisp.›
  • old-edition numerals: 694 before ‹in utero formari› (in the synopsis); 695 after ‹curasti,›
  • signature: none
  • other: the synopsis of Letter XV (begun in col 677) ends in col 678; the bracket after "disponunt" ("[Al. describunt.") is printed without its closing bracket; the name read "Dictinii" in the synopsis is faint
PL 54:679
recaluisse sentinam. Nihil est enim sordium in quorumcumque sensibus impiorum, quod in hoc dogma non confluxit: quoniam de omni terrenarum opinionum luto multiplicem sibi faeculentiam miscuerunt: ut soli totum biberent quidquid alii ex parte gustassent. Denique si universae haereses quae ante Priscilliani tempus exortae sunt diligentius retractentur, nullus pene invenietur error de quo non traxerit impietas ista contagium: quae non contenta eorum recipere falsitates qui ab Evangelio sub Christi nomine deviarunt, tenebris se etiam paganitatis immersit, ut per magicarum artium profana secreta et mathematicorum vana mendacia, religionis fidem morumque rationem in potestate daemonum, et in effectu siderum collocarent. Quod si et credi liceat et doceri, nec virtutibus praemium, nec vitiis poena debebitur, omniaque non solum humanarum legum, sed etiam divinarum constitutionum decreta solventur: quia neque de bonis neque de malis actibus ullum poterit esse judicium, si in utramque partem fatalis necessitas motum mentis impellit, et quidquid ab hominibus agitur, non est hominum, sed astrorum.
[…] grown warm again. For there is no filth in the minds of any impious men whatever that has not flowed together into this doctrine: since from all the mud of earthly opinions they have mixed for themselves a manifold dregs, so that they alone might drink the whole of whatever others had tasted in part. In short, if all the heresies which arose before the time of Priscillian are examined more carefully, hardly any error will be found from which this impiety has not drawn infection: which, not content to take in the falsehoods of those who have strayed from the Gospel under the name of Christ, has plunged itself also into the darkness of paganism, so that through the profane secrets of the magic arts and the vain lies of the astrologers they placed the faith of religion and the conduct of morals in the power of demons and in the working of the stars. But if this may be both believed and taught, neither will reward be owed to virtues nor punishment to vices, and all the decrees not only of human laws but also of divine ordinances will be dissolved: because there can be no judgement concerning either good or bad actions, if a fatal necessity drives the movement of the mind in either direction, and whatever is done by men is not men's doing, but the stars'.
Ad hanc insaniam pertinet prodigiosa illa totius humani corporis per duodecim coeli signa distinctio, ut diversis partibus diversae praesideant potestates; et creatura quam Deus ad imaginem suam fecit, in tanta sit obligatione siderum, in quanta est connexione membrorum. Merito patres nostri, sub quorum temporibus haeresis haec nefanda prorupit, per totum mundum instanter egere ut impius furor ab universa Ecclesia pelleretur: quando etiam mundi principes ita hanc sacrilegam amentiam detestati sunt, ut auctorem ejus cum plerisque discipulis legem publicarum ense prosternerent. Videbant enim omnem curam honestatis auferri, omnem conjugiorum copulam solvi, simulque divinum jus
To this madness belongs that monstrous division of the whole human body according to the twelve signs of heaven, so that different powers preside over different parts; and the creature which God made to His own image is held in as great a bondage to the stars as it is in the joining together of its members. Rightly did our fathers, in whose times this abominable heresy broke out, act urgently throughout the whole world that the impious frenzy might be driven out of the universal Church: when even the princes of the world so detested this sacrilegious madness that they struck down its author, with most of his disciples, by the sword of the public laws. For they saw that all care for decency was being taken away, every bond of marriage dissolved, and at the same time divine […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 679

Footnotes

(l) continued from col 678, set in n678.

(a) ‹Nihil est enim› · printed under col 679

Al., sordidum. Post pauca, de omnium terrenarum opinionum luto, in antiquioribus editis et aliquibus codd.

Elsewhere, sordidum. A little after, de omnium terrenarum opinionum luto, in the older editions and some manuscripts.

(b) ‹multiplicem sibi› · printed under col 679

Al., faecem commiscuerunt. Quesn. in margine.

Elsewhere, faecem commiscuerunt. Quesnel in the margin.

(c) ‹diligentius retractentur,› · printed under col 679

Cod. Vindebon. Hisp. tunc nullus. Porro invenietur magis placuit ex praestantioribus septem nostris codicibus. Alias, invenitur. Paulo post in mss. Vat. Hisp. et Isid., non vero in puriori Vindebon. Hisp. nec in caeteris, in tenebras se adeo paganitatis immersit per magicarum artium profana secreta, et mathematicorum vana mendacia, ut religionis, etc.

The Vienna Spanish manuscript, tunc nullus. Further, invenietur was preferred, from seven of our better manuscripts. Elsewhere, invenitur. A little after, in the Vatican Spanish and Isidorian manuscripts, but not in the purer Vienna Spanish nor in the others, in tenebras se adeo paganitatis immersit per magicarum artium profana secreta, et mathematicorum vana mendacia, ut religionis, etc.

(d) ‹daemonum, et in› · printed under col 679

Ita omnes nostri codices et editi ante Quesn., qui ex duobus solis mss. Thuan. et Grim. affectu praetulit. Post pauca, pro debebitur alias debetur. Mox omniumque in ms. Vindeb. Hisp.

So all our manuscripts and the editions before Quesnel, who from two manuscripts only, the de Thou and the Grimani, preferred affectu. A little after, for debebitur, elsewhere debetur. Shortly after, omniumque in the Vienna Spanish manuscript.

(e) ‹Ad hanc insaniam pertinet› · printed under col 679

Mss. Vindebon. Hisp. et Vat. collect. 21 addunt et.

The Vienna Spanish manuscripts and the Vatican of collection 21 add et.

(f) ‹amentiam detestati sunt,› · printed under col 679

Vide not. 4 Quesn. Mox, pro cum plerisque discipulis, alias, ac plerosque discipulos ex mss. collect. 24. Dein cod. Vindeb. Hisp.: Viderunt enim... omnemque conjugiorum.

See Quesnel's note 4. Shortly after, for cum plerisque discipulis, elsewhere ac plerosque discipulos, from the manuscripts of collection 24. Then the Vienna Spanish manuscript: Viderunt enim... omnemque conjugiorum.

(g): call in col 680, printed under col 679; set in n680.

Page

  • running head: 679 S. LEONIS MAGNI (across the page)
  • marginal letters: A ‹recaluisse sentinam›; B ‹na debebitur, omniaque›; C ‹etiam mundi principes›; D (in the footnotes) ‹nec in caeteris, in tenebras›
  • old-edition numerals: 696 after ‹coeli signa›
  • signature: none
  • other: "opinionum" in the text has a worn n, set plain
PL 54:680
humanumque subverti, si hujusmodi hominibus usquam vivere cum tali professione licuisset. Profuit diu ista districtio ecclesiasticae lenitati, quae etsi sacerdotali contenta judicio, cruentas refugit ultiones, severis tamen Christianorum principum constitutionibus adjuvatur, dum ad spiritale nonnumquam recurrunt remedium, qui timent corporale supplicium. Ex quo autem multas provincias hostilis occupavit irruptio, et executionem legum tempestates interclusere bellorum. Ex quo inter sacerdotes Dei difficiles commeatus et rari coeperunt esse conventus, invenit ob publicam pertubationem secreta perfidia libertatem, et ad multarum mentium subversionem his malis est incitata, quibus debuit esse correcta. Quae vero illic aut quanta pars plebium a contagione pestis hujus aliena est, ubi, sicut dilectio tua indicat, lethali morbo etiam quorumdam sacerdotum corda corrupta sunt; et per quos opprimenda falsitas et defendenda veritas credebatur, per ipsos doctrinae Priscillianae Evangelium subditur Christi, ut ad profanos sensus pietate sanctorum voluminum depravata, sub nominibus prophetarum et apostolorum non hoc praedicetur quod Spiritus sanctus docuit, sed quod diaboli minister inseruit. Quia ergo dilectio tua fideli, quantum potuit, diligentia damnatas olim opiniones sedecim capitulis comprehendit, nos quoque strictim omnia retractamus, ne aliquid harum blasphemiarum aut tolerabile videatur aut dubium.
[…] and human law overturned, if men of this kind had been allowed to live anywhere with such a profession. This severity long helped the gentleness of the Church, which, though content with priestly judgement and shrinking from bloody punishments, is nevertheless aided by the stern ordinances of Christian princes, since those who fear bodily punishment sometimes run back to the spiritual remedy. But from the time when hostile invasion seized many provinces, and the storms of wars shut off the execution of the laws; from the time when journeys between the priests of God became difficult and assemblies rare, secret faithlessness found freedom through the public disturbance, and was spurred on to the overturning of many minds by those very evils by which it ought to have been corrected. But what part of the peoples there, or how great a part, is free from the contagion of this plague, where, as your love indicates, the hearts even of certain priests have been corrupted by the deadly disease; and through those by whom falsehood was believed to be put down and truth defended, through those very men the Gospel of Christ is made subject to the doctrine of Priscillian, so that, the piety of the holy volumes being twisted to profane meanings, under the names of the prophets and apostles there is preached not what the Holy Spirit taught but what the minister of the devil inserted. Since, then, your love, with faithful diligence as far as it could, has gathered the opinions condemned long ago into sixteen chapters, we too go over them all again briefly, lest any of these blasphemies seem either tolerable or doubtful.
CAP. I. Quam impie de Trinitate personarum in Deo sentiant Priscillianistae. — Primo itaque capitulo demonstratur quam impie sentiant de Trinitate divina, qui et Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti unam atque eamdem asserunt esse personam, tanquam idem Deus nunc Pater, nunc Filius, nunc Spiritus sanctus nominetur; nec alius sit qui genuit, alius
CHAP. I. How impiously the Priscillianists think about the Trinity of persons in God. — In the first chapter, then, it is shown how impiously they think about the divine Trinity, who assert that there is one and the same person of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, as though the same God were named now Father, now Son, now Holy Spirit; and there were not one who begot, another […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 680

Footnotes

(g) ‹Profuit› · printed under cols 679–680

Voces diu ista desunt in Vat. Reg. collect. 1. Mox in Vat. Hisp., Isid. et mss. collect. 21, refugit ultiones quaerere; tamen Christianorum. In Vindebon. Hisp. refugit ultione esse quaeris tamen, etc., corrupte. Sed hinc praedictae variantis origo cognoscitur, simulque elucet perperam scriptum ultione esse quaeris pro ultiones, severis. Dein ad speratum pro ad spiritale in laudatis codd. Vat. Hisp. et Isid. atque in illis collect. 21.

The words diu ista are lacking in the Vatican Regina manuscript of collection 1. Shortly after, in the Vatican Spanish and Isidorian and the manuscripts of collection 21, refugit ultiones quaerere; tamen Christianorum. In the Vienna Spanish, refugit ultione esse quaeris tamen, etc., corruptly. But from this the origin of the variant mentioned above is recognized, and at the same time it is clear that ultione esse quaeris was wrongly written for ultiones, severis. Then ad speratum for ad spiritale in the Vatican Spanish and Isidorian manuscripts already cited, and in those of collection 21.

(h) ‹irruptio,› · printed under col 680

Conjunctionem et sententiae magis congruam a Quesnello licet expunctam, restituimus auctoritate codd. Vat. collect. 3 Vindebon., collect. 5 et Vat. Hisp. ac Isid., necnon alius Vat. collect. 24, ex quibus nonnulli plurali numero, et exsecutiones. Mox pro interclusere editi ante Quesn. interdixere. Dein in Vat. Hisp. et Isid., difficilis commeatus, et postea, ad multarum gentium subversionem.

The conjunction et, which suits the sense better, though struck out by Quesnel, we have restored on the authority of the manuscripts Vatican of collection 3, Vienna of collection 5, and the Vatican Spanish and Isidorian, and also another Vatican of collection 24, of which some have, in the plural, et exsecutiones. Shortly after, for interclusere the editions before Quesnel have interdixere. Then in the Vatican Spanish and Isidorian, difficilis commeatus, and afterwards, ad multarum gentium subversionem.

(i) ‹pars plebium› · printed under col 680

Codd. Vindebon. collect. 5 et Hisp. ac Vat. collect. 11, 21, et 24 omittunt a contagione. Dein charitas tua est in duobus mss. et antiquioribus editis pro dilectio tua.

The Vienna manuscripts of collection 5 and the Spanish, and the Vatican of collections 11, 21 and 24, omit a contagione. Then charitas tua is in two manuscripts and the older editions for dilectio tua.

(j) ‹defendenda veritas› · printed under col 680

Cod. Vat. collect. 24, fuerat. Mox doctrinae Priscilliani in Vat. Reg. collect. 1, in Vindebon. Hisp. et in duobus codd. collect. 11 et 24 cum editis ante Quesn.

The Vatican manuscript of collection 24, fuerat. Shortly after, doctrinae Priscilliani in the Vatican Regina of collection 1, in the Vienna Spanish and in two manuscripts of collections 11 and 24, with the editions before Quesnel.

(k) ‹damnatas olim opiniones› · printed under col 680

Sic omnes nostri codices, exceptis mss. Vat. collect 8 et 24, in quibus habetur septemdecim capitulis, computato, ut videtur, postremo hujus epistolae capite, quod tamen ad sedecim capitula a Turribio proposita et a Leone totidem capitibus rejecta minime pertinet. Post pauca retractemus editi ante Quesn. cum sex inferioris notae codicibus.

So all our manuscripts, except the Vatican manuscripts of collections 8 and 24, in which septemdecim capitulis [seventeen chapters] is found, counting, it seems, the last chapter of this letter, which however does not at all belong to the sixteen chapters put forward by Turribius and rejected by Leo in as many heads. A little after, retractemus in the editions before Quesnel, with six manuscripts of inferior mark.

Page

  • running head: MAGNI EPISTOLAE. 680 (continuing "S. LEONIS" from col 679)
  • marginal letters: A ‹humanumque subverti›; B ‹contagione pestis hujus›; C ‹demonstratur quam impie›; D (in the footnotes) ‹Vat. Hisp. et Isid., difficilis›
  • old-edition numerals: 697 after ‹etiam›
  • signature: none
  • other: "pertubationem" printed for "perturbationem" (listed as a misprint); "Trinitate" in the CAP. I heading has a worn i, set plain
PL 54:681
qui genitus est, alius qui de utroque processit; sed singularis unitas in tribus quidem vocabulis, sed non in tribus sit accipienda personis. Quod blasphemiae genus de Sabellii opinione sumpserunt: cujus discipuli etiam Patripassiani merito nuncupantur; quia si ipse est Filius, qui est Pater, crux Filii, Patris est passio; et quidquid in forma servi Filius Patri obediendo sustinuit, totum in se Pater ipse suscepit. Quod catholicae fidei sine ambiguitate contrarium est, quae Trinitatem Deitatis sic ὁμοούσιον confitetur, ut Patrem, et Filium, et Spiritum sanctum sine confusione indivisos, sine tempore sempiternos, sine differentia credat aequales: quia Unitatem in Trinitate non eadem persona, sed eadem implet essentia.
[…] who is begotten, another who proceeded from both; but a single unity is to be understood under three names indeed, but not in three persons. This kind of blasphemy they took from the opinion of Sabellius, whose disciples are also rightly called Patripassians; because, if the Son is the same as the Father, the cross of the Son is the suffering of the Father; and whatever the Son endured in the form of a servant in obeying the Father, the Father Himself took wholly upon Himself. This is without ambiguity contrary to the catholic faith, which confesses the Trinity of the Godhead as homoousion in such a way that it believes the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit to be undivided without confusion, everlasting without time, equal without difference: because it is not the same person but the same essence that fills the Unity in the Trinity.
CAP. II. De virtutibus quas ex Deo procedere fingunt. — In secundo capitulo ostenditur ineptum vanumque commentum de processionibus quarumdam virtutum ex Deo, quas habere coeperit et quas essentia sui ipse praecesserit. In quo Arianorum quoque suffragantur errori, dicentium quod Pater Filio prior sit, quia fuerit aliquando sine Filio, et tunc Pater esse coeperit, quando Filium genuerit. Sed sicut illos catholica Ecclesia detestatur, ita et istos, qui putant umquam Deo id quod ejusdem est essentiae defuisse. Quem sicut mutabilem, ita et proficientem dicere nefas est. Quam enim mutatur quod minuitur, tam mutatur etiam quod augetur.
CHAP. II. On the powers which they pretend proceed from God. — In the second chapter is shown the foolish and empty fiction about the processions of certain powers from God, which He began to have, and which He Himself preceded by His own essence. In this they also support the error of the Arians, who say that the Father is prior to the Son, because He was at some time without the Son, and began to be Father then when He begot the Son. But just as the catholic Church detests those men, so also these, who think that what is of His same essence was ever lacking to God. For it is impious to call Him progressing, just as it is to call Him changeable. For what is increased is changed just as much as what is diminished.
CAP. III. Cur unigenitus dicatur apud eos Filius Dei. — Tertii vero capituli sermo designat, quod iidem impii asserant, ideo unigenitum dici Filium Dei, quia solus sit natus ex virgine. Quod utique non auderent dicere, nisi Pauli Samosateni et Photini virus hausissent, qui dixerunt Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, antequam nasceretur ex virgine Maria, non fuisse. Si autem isti aliud de suo sensu intelligi volunt, neque principium de matre dant Christo, asserant necesse est non unum esse Filium Dei, sed alios quoque ex summo Patre genitos, quorum hic unus sit natus ex femina, et ob hoc appelletur Unigenitus: quia hanc nascendi conditionem alius filiorum Dei nemo susceperit. Quoquoversum igitur se contulerint, in magnae tendunt impietatis abruptum, si
CHAP. III. Why among them the Son of God is called only-begotten. — The wording of the third chapter points out that these same impious men assert that the Son of God is called only-begotten for this reason, that He alone was born of a virgin. This they would surely not dare to say had they not drunk in the poison of Paul of Samosata and Photinus, who said that our Lord Jesus Christ did not exist before He was born of the Virgin Mary. But if these men wish something else to be understood of their meaning, and do not give Christ a beginning from His mother, they must assert that there is not one Son of God, but that others too were begotten of the supreme Father, of whom this one was born of a woman and is for this reason called Only-begotten: because no other of the sons of God underwent this condition of being born. Whichever way, therefore, they turn, they are heading for the precipice of great impiety, if […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 681

Footnotes

(a) ‹qui genitus est,› · printed under col 681

Mss. Hisp. et Isid., aut qui Mox procedit pro processit apud Theodulphum lib. de Spiritu sancto.

The Spanish and Isidorian manuscripts, aut qui. Shortly after, procedit for processit in Theodulf's book On the Holy Spirit.

(b) ‹sed non› · printed under col 681

Inseruimus in ex. Vat. Reg. collect. 1. Vindeb. collect. 5, Vat. et Vercell. collect. 8, nec non Vat. Hisp. et Isid. In Vindebon. Hisp., et non in tribus, deleto sed. Post in pauca sex codd., Patripassiani non immerito. Dein Filius Patris obediens sustinuit in Vindebon. Hisp.

We have inserted in from the Vatican Regina manuscript of collection 1, the Vienna of collection 5, the Vatican and Vercelli of collection 8, and also the Vatican Spanish and Isidorian. In the Vienna Spanish, et non in tribus, with sed deleted. After a little, six manuscripts, Patripassiani non immerito. Then Filius Patris obediens sustinuit in the Vienna Spanish.

(c) ‹quae› · printed under col 681

Quesnellus cum antea editis et ms. Grim., Trinitatem Unitatis retinuit, etsi notaverit in margine Trinitatem Deitatis reperiri in novem suis codicibus, quibus alii plures nostri accedunt, inter quos Vat. Reg. collec. 1 et Vindebon. Hisp. solum pro Deitatis habent Divinitatis. Hanc autem lectionem omnino praeferendam evincit similis lectio hujus epistolae cap. 17, ubi antecedentia compendio repetuntur. Unus Barb. habet Trinitatis Unitatem.

Quesnel, with the earlier editions and the Grimani manuscript, kept Trinitatem Unitatis, although he noted in the margin that Trinitatem Deitatis is found in nine of his manuscripts, to which many others of ours are added, among which the Vatican Regina of collection 1 and the Vienna Spanish only have Divinitatis for Deitatis. That this reading is altogether to be preferred is proved by the like reading in chapter 17 of this letter, where the preceding matter is repeated in summary. One Barberini manuscript has Trinitatis Unitatem.

(d) ‹vanumque commentum› · printed under cols 681–682

Ms. Vat. collect. 8, de processione. Mox in Vulg., essentia sua. Quesnellus correxit ex omnibus suis codicibus, quibus astipulantur etiam nostri, uno excepto, in quo et per quas essentia sua.

The Vatican manuscript of collection 8, de processione. Shortly after, in the common editions, essentia sua. Quesnel corrected it from all his manuscripts, with which ours also agree, except one, in which et per quas essentia sua.

(e) ‹In quo Arianorum› · printed under col 682

Ex mss. Vindebon. collect. 5, nec non ex collectione Hisp. et Isid. aliisque codd. inseruimus quoque, satis congrue; indicatur enim, Priscillianistas non solum Sabellianis, de quibus capite antecedenti, sed Arianis quoque, licet Sabellianorum errori oppositis, suffragari. Post pauca pro genuerit unus cod. generavit, duo generarit. Dein essentiale pro, essentiae in Vindeb. Hisp.

From the Vienna manuscripts of collection 5, and also from the Spanish and Isidorian collection and other manuscripts, we have inserted quoque, fittingly enough; for it is indicated that the Priscillianists side not only with the Sabellians, of whom in the preceding chapter, but with the Arians too, though they are opposed to the error of the Sabellians. A little after, for genuerit one manuscript has generavit, two generarit. Then essentiale for essentiae in the Vienna Spanish.

(f) ‹Filius Dei. —› · printed under col 682

Duo mss. Vindebon. collect. 5 et Hisp. Tertio vero (vel autem) capitulo. Aliquando post idem codex collect. 5 cum antiquioribus Vulg., ex summo Patre progenitos. Dein in Vat. Hisp., si Christum Dominum nostrum; Isid., Dominum Jesum.

The two Vienna manuscripts, of collection 5 and the Spanish, Tertio vero (or autem) capitulo. Some way after, the same manuscript of collection 5, with the older common editions, ex summo Patre progenitos. Then in the Vatican Spanish, si Christum Dominum nostrum; the Isidorian, Dominum Jesum.

Page

  • running head: 681 EPISTOLA X… (the rest across the page, over col 682, "…STOLA XV.")
  • marginal letters: A ‹qui genitus est›; B ‹gunt. — In secundo capitulo›; C ‹dicere, nisi Pauli Samosateni›; D (in the footnotes) ‹deleto sed. Post in pauca›
  • old-edition numerals: 698 after ‹Unitatem in›; 699 after ‹Quoquoversum›
  • signature: PATROL. LIV. (foot of col 681)
  • other: the Greek word ὁμοούσιον is printed in the text and set as printed; in (a) no stop is printed after "aut qui"; in (d) "Vulg." abbreviates the common editions
PL 54:682
Christum Dominum vel ex matre volunt habere principium, vel Patris Dei unigenitum diffitentur, cum et de matre is natus sit qui erat Deus Verbum, et de Patre nemo sit genitus praeter Verbum.
[…] they will either have Christ the Lord take His beginning from His mother, or deny that He is the only-begotten of God the Father, since He Who was God the Word was born of the mother, and no one was begotten of the Father except the Word.
CAP. IV. Quod jejunent in Natali Domini et die Dominica. — Quarto autem capitulo continetur, quod Natalem Christi, quem secundum susceptionem veri hominis catholica Ecclesia veneratur, quia Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, 14), non vere isti honorent, sed honorare se simulent, jejunantes eodem die, sicut et die Dominico qui est dies resurrectionis Christi. Quod utique ideo faciunt quia Christum Dominum in vera hominis natura natum esse non credunt, sed per quamdam illusionem ostentata videri volunt quae vera non fuerint; sequentes dogmata Cerdonis atque Marcionis, et cognatis suis Manichaeis per omnia consonantes. Qui, sicut in nostro examine detecti atque convicti sunt, Dominicum diem, quem nobis Salvatoris, nostri resurrectio consecravit, exigunt in moerore jejunii; solis, ut proditum est, reverentiae hanc continentiam devoventes: ut per omnia sint a nostrae fidei unitate discordes, et dies qui a nobis in laetitia habetur, ab illis in afflictione ducatur. Unde dignum est ut inimici crucis et resurrectionis Christi talem excipiant sententiam, qualem elegerunt doctrinam.
CHAP. IV. That they fast on the Nativity of the Lord and on the Lord's day. — The fourth chapter contains the point that these men do not truly honour the Nativity of Christ, which the catholic Church venerates according to His taking up of true manhood, because the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14), but pretend to honour it, fasting on that same day, as also on the Lord's day, which is the day of Christ's resurrection. This they surely do because they do not believe that Christ the Lord was born in the true nature of man, but hold that things were displayed through a kind of illusion to be seen which were not real; following the doctrines of Cerdo and Marcion, and agreeing in all things with their kinsmen the Manichaeans. These, as they were detected and convicted in our own examination, spend the Lord's day, which the resurrection of our Saviour hallowed for us, in the gloom of fasting; devoting this abstinence, as has been disclosed, to the veneration of the sun: so that in all things they are at discord with the unity of our faith, and the day which is kept by us in gladness is passed by them in affliction. Hence it is fitting that the enemies of the cross and resurrection of Christ should receive such a sentence as the doctrine they have chosen.
CAP. V. Quod animam hominis divinae asserunt esse substantiae. — Quinto capitulo refertur quod animam hominis divinae asserant esse substantiae, nec a natura Creatoris sui conditionis nostrae distare naturam. Quam impietatem ex philosophorum quorumdam et Manichaeorum opinione manantem catholica fides damnat: sciens nullam tam sublimem tamque praecipuam esse facturam, cui Deus ipse natura sit. Quod enim de ipso est, id est quod ipse, neque id aliud est quam Filius et Spiritus sanctus. Praeter hanc autem summae Trinitatis unam, consubstantialem, et sempiternam, atque incommutabilem Deitatem, nihil omnium creaturarum est quod non in exordio sui ex nihilo creatum sit. Non autem quidquid inter creaturas eminet Deus est, nec si quid magnum est atque mirabile, hoc est quod ille qui facit mirabilia magna solus (Ps. XXXV, 4.) Nemo
CHAP. V. That they assert the soul of man to be of the divine substance. — In the fifth chapter it is reported that they assert the soul of man to be of the divine substance, and that the nature of our condition does not differ from the nature of its Creator. This impiety, flowing from the opinion of certain philosophers and of the Manichaeans, the catholic faith condemns: knowing that no thing made is so lofty and so pre-eminent that God Himself is its nature. For what is from Him is what He is, and that is nothing other than the Son and the Holy Spirit. But apart from this one, consubstantial, everlasting and unchangeable Godhead of the supreme Trinity, there is nothing among all creatures which was not created from nothing at its beginning. Yet not whatever stands out among creatures is God, nor, if anything is great and wonderful, is it that which He is Who alone does great wonders (Ps. 35 [135]:4). No one […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 682

Footnotes

(d) continued from col 681, set in n681.

(g) ‹ostentata videri volunt› · printed under col 682

Mss. Vindeb. Hisp. et Vat. collect. 11, quasi vera. Vat. Hisp. et Isid., quasi vera. Post pauca Vulg. ante Quesn. cum nonnullis mss., dogma Cerdonis, et concordantes pro consonantes.

The Vienna Spanish manuscripts and the Vatican of collection 11, quasi vera. The Vatican Spanish and Isidorian, quasi vera. A little after, the common editions before Quesnel, with some manuscripts, dogma Cerdonis, and concordantes for consonantes.

(h) ‹de ipso est,› · printed under col 682

Al., idem est. Quidam codices Vat. cum Vindeb. Hisp., hoc est quod, ipse neque aliud est.

Elsewhere, idem est. Certain Vatican manuscripts, with the Vienna Spanish, hoc est quod, ipse neque aliud est.

Page

  • running head: …STOLA XV. 682 (across the page from col 681, "EPISTOLA X…")
  • marginal letters: A ‹Christum Dominum vel›; B ‹Manichaeis per omnia›; C ‹Manichaeorum opinione›; D (in the footnotes) ‹non solum Sabellianis›
  • old-edition numerals: 700 after ‹aliud est›
  • signature: 22 (foot of col 682)
  • other: the Psalm reference is printed "(Ps. XXXV, 4.)" for Ps. CXXXV, 4 (listed as a misprint); "secun dum" printed with a space, joined; "divinae" in the CAP. V heading has a worn i, set plain; the text of col 682 ends with the whole word "Nemo" (no hyphen)
PL 54:683
hominum veritas, nemo sapientia, nemo justitia est; sed multi participes sunt veritatis, et sapientiae atque justitiae. Solus autem Deus nullius participationis indigus est: de quo quidquid digne utcumque sentitur, non qualitas est, sed essentia. Incommutabili enim nihil accedit, nihil deperit: quia esse illi, quod est sempiternum, semper est proprium. Unde in se manens innovat omnia, et nihil accepit quod ipse non dederit. Nimium igitur superbi nimiumque sunt caeci qui cum dicant humanam animam divinae esse substantiae, non intelligunt nihil se aliud dicere quam Deum esse mutabilem, et ipsum perpeti quidquid potest naturae ejus inferri.
[…] of men is truth, none is wisdom, none is justice; but many are partakers of truth, and of wisdom and justice. God alone, however, is in need of no participation: whatever is in any way worthily thought of Him is not a quality, but essence. For to the Unchangeable nothing is added, nothing is lost: because to be, which is everlasting, is always proper to Him. Hence, abiding in Himself, He makes all things new, and He has received nothing which He did not Himself give. Exceedingly proud, then, and exceedingly blind are those who, when they say that the human soul is of the divine substance, do not understand that they are saying nothing else than that God is changeable, and that He Himself suffers whatever can be inflicted on its nature.
Cap. VI. Quod aiunt diabolum numquam fuisse bonum, nec Dei opus esse, sed ex chao et tenebris emersisse. — Sexta annotatio indicat eos dicere quod diabolus numquam fuerit bonus, nec natura ejus opificium Dei sit, sed eum ex chao et tenebris emersisse: quia scilicet nullum sui habeat auctorem, sed omnis mali ipse sit principium atque substantia: cum fides vera, quae est catholica, omnium creaturarum sive spiritualium, sive corporalium bonam confiteatur substantiam, et mali nullam esse naturam: quia Deus, qui universitatis est conditor, nihil non bonum fecit. Unde et diabolus bonus esset, si in eo quod factus est permaneret. Sed quia naturali excellentia male usus est, et in veritate non stetit (Joan. VIII, 44). non in contrariam transiit substantiam, sed a summo bono, cui debuit adhaerere, descivit; sicut ipsi qui talia asserunt a veris in falsa proruunt, et naturam in eo arguunt in quo sponte delinquunt, ac pro sua voluntaria perversitate damnantur. Quod utique in ipsis malum erit, et ipsum malum non erit substantia, sed poena substantiae.
Chap. VI. That they say the devil was never good, and is not the work of God, but emerged out of chaos and darkness. — The sixth notice indicates that they say that the devil was never good, and that his nature is not the handiwork of God, but that he emerged out of chaos and darkness: because, that is, he has no author of himself, but is himself the principle and substance of all evil; whereas the true faith, which is the catholic faith, confesses that the substance of all creatures, whether spiritual or bodily, is good, and that evil has no nature: because God, Who is the founder of the universe, made nothing that is not good. Hence the devil too would be good, if he had remained in that which he was made. But because he made evil use of his natural excellence, and did not stand in the truth (John 8:44), he did not pass over into a contrary substance, but fell away from the supreme good to which he ought to have clung; just as those very men who assert such things rush headlong from what is true into what is false, and accuse nature in that in which they sin of their own will, and are condemned for their own voluntary perversity. And this evil will certainly be in them, and the evil itself will not be a substance, but the punishment of a substance.
Cap. VII. Damnant nuptias et usum matrimanii. — Septimo loco sequitur, quod nuptias damnant, et procreationem nascentium perhorrescunt, in quo, sicut pene in omnibus, cum Manichaeorum profanitate concordant: ideo, sicut ipsorum mores probant, conjugalem capulam detestantur; quia
Chap. VII. They condemn marriage and the use of matrimony. — In the seventh place follows that they condemn marriage and shudder at the procreation of those who are born, in which, as in almost everything, they agree with the profanity of the Manichaeans: therefore, as their own morals prove, they detest the conjugal union; because […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 683

Footnotes

(a) ‹Incommutabili enim› · printed under col 683

Sex nostri codd., nihil accidit: et dein Vulg. ante Quesn. cum quibusdam inferioris notae codd. nihil accipit.

Six of our manuscripts, "nihil accidit" ("nothing befalls"); and then the Vulgate [edition] before Quesnel, with some manuscripts of lower standing, "nihil accipit" ("receives nothing").

(b) ‹sunt caeci› · printed under col 683

Codd. Vat. Reg. collect. 1 et Vat. Hisp. atque Isid., quicumque dicunt. Vindebon collect. 5, qui cum dicunt. Dein, naturae vel animae ejus inferri in Vat. Hisp. et Isid. tribusque ali⟨i⟩s mss.

The manuscripts Vatican Regina collection 1 and the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, "quicumque dicunt" ("whoever say"). The Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5, "qui cum dicunt". Then, "naturae vel animae ejus inferri" ("inflicted on its nature or soul") in the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian and three other manuscripts.

(c) ‹habeat auctorem, sed› · printed under col 683

Vat. Reg. collect. 1, cum uno Thuaneo Quesn., omnibus malis. Alius noster codex, omnibus mali. Vide not. 6 Quesn. Post pauca sex nostri codd., cum fides ea, quae est.

Vatican Regina collection 1, with one Thuanean [manuscript] of Quesnel, "omnibus malis" ("to all evils"). Another manuscript of ours, "omnibus mali". See Quesnel's note 6. A little after, six of our manuscripts, "cum fides ea, quae est" ("whereas that faith which is").

(d) ‹Quod utique› · printed under col 683

Codd., Vat. Reg. collect. 1, duo Vindeb. collect. 5, et Hisp. aliique duo Vatt. delent praepositionem in. Paulo post, sed poena substantiae delent mss. Vat. 5845 et Grimanicum.

The manuscripts Vatican Regina collection 1, two Vienna [manuscripts] of collection 5, and the Hispana and two other Vatican [manuscripts] delete the preposition "in". A little after, the manuscripts Vatican 5845 and the Grimani manuscript delete "sed poena substantiae" ("but the punishment of a substance").

(e) ‹Septimo loco› · printed under col 683

Mss. Hisp. et Isid., consequitur.

The Hispana and Isidorian manuscripts, "consequitur" ("follows next").

(f) ‹conjugalem capulam detestantur;› · printed under col 683

In Vat. Hisp. et Isid., tribusque aliis mss., quia est illic libertas turpitudinis, ubi non pudor et matrimonii servatur, et sobolis. Editi ante Quesnellum sequuntur lectionem textus exceptis verbis et sobolis, quorum loco habent et spes sobolis.

In the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, and in three other manuscripts, "quia est illic libertas turpitudinis, ubi non pudor et matrimonii servatur, et sobolis" ("because there is licence for shamefulness there, where neither the modesty of matrimony nor of offspring is preserved"). The editions before Quesnel follow the reading of the text, except for the words "et sobolis", in place of which they have "et spes sobolis" ("and the hope of offspring").

(g) called in col 684, printed under col 683 (continuing under col 684): set in n684.

Page

  • running head: 683 S. LEONIS MAGNI (across the page with col 684)
  • marginal letters: A ‹hominum veritas, nemo›; B ‹diabolus numquam fuerit›; C ‹delinquunt, ac pro›; D (in the footnotes) ‹(c) Vat. Reg. collect. 1›
  • old-edition numerals: 701 before ‹Cap. VII.›
  • signature: none
  • other: none
PL 54:684
non est illic libertas turpitudinis, ubi pudor et matrimonii servatur et sobolis.
[…] there is no licence for shamefulness there, where the modesty both of matrimony and of offspring is preserved.
Cap. VIII. — Corpora humana aiunt per diabolum formari, et eorum resurrectionem negant. — Octavum ipsorum est, plasmationem humanorum corporum diaboli esse figmentum, et semina conceptionum opera daemonum in mulierum uteris figurari: propter quod resurrectionem carnis non esse credendam, quia concretio corporis non sit congruens animae dignitati. Quae falsitas sine dubio opus diaboli est, et talia prodigia opinionum, figmenta sunt daemonum, qui non in feminarum ventribus formant homines, sed in haereticorum cordibus tales fabricantur errores. Quod immundissimum virus de Manichaeae impietatis specialiter fonte procedens, olim fides catholica deprehendit atque damnavit.
Chap. VIII. — They say that human bodies are formed by the devil, and they deny their resurrection. — Their eighth [point] is that the moulding of human bodies is a fabrication of the devil, and that the seeds of conceptions are shaped in the wombs of women by the work of demons: on which account the resurrection of the flesh is not to be believed, because the compacting of the body is not befitting the dignity of the soul. This falsehood is without doubt the work of the devil, and such monstrous opinions are the fabrications of demons, who do not form men in the wombs of women, but fashion such errors in the hearts of heretics. This most unclean poison, proceeding especially from the fount of the Manichaean impiety, the catholic faith long ago detected and condemned.
Cap. IV. Filios promissionis per Spiritum sanctum conceptos esse dicunt. — Nona autem annotatio manifesta quod filios promissionis, ex mulieribus quidem natos, sed ex Spiritu sancto dicant esse conceptos: ne illa soboles quae de carnis semine nascitur, ad Dei conditionem pertinere videatur. Quod catholicae fidei repugnans atque contrarium est, quae omnem hominem in corporis animaeque substantia a conditore universitatis formari atque animari intra materna viscera confitetur: manente quidem illo peccati mortalitatisque contagio, quod in prolem a primo parente transcurrit; sed regenerationis sacramento subveniente, quo per Spiritum sanctum promissionis filii renascuntur, non in utero carnis, sed in virtute baptismatis. Unde et David, qui utique erat promissionis filius dicit ad Deum: Manus tuae fecerunt, me, et plasmaverunt me (Ps. CXVIII, 75; Job X, 8). Et ad Jeremiam Dominus ait: Prius quam te formarem in utero, novi te; et in vulva matris tuae sanctificavi te (Jerem. I, 5).
Chap. IV [= IX]. They say that the sons of the promise were conceived by the Holy Spirit. — The ninth notice makes plain that they say the sons of the promise, born indeed of women, were yet conceived of the Holy Spirit: lest that offspring which is born of the seed of the flesh should seem to belong to the creating work of God. This is repugnant and contrary to the catholic faith, which confesses that every man, in the substance of body and soul, is formed and given a soul within his mother's womb by the founder of the universe: there remains indeed that contagion of sin and mortality which passes down to the offspring from the first parent; but the sacrament of regeneration comes to its aid, by which the sons of the promise are reborn through the Holy Spirit, not in the womb of the flesh, but in the power of baptism. Hence David too, who was certainly a son of the promise, says to God: Thy hands have made me, and fashioned me (Ps. 118:75; Job 10:8). And the Lord says to Jeremiah: Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you; and in your mother's womb I sanctified you (Jer. 1:5).
Cap. X. Affirmant animas in coelo, peccantes, in corpora detrusas pro peccati poena. — Decimo autem capitulo referuntur asserere, animas quae humanis corporibus inseruntur fuisse sine corpore, et in coelesti
Chap. X. They affirm that souls which sinned in heaven were thrust down into bodies as the punishment of sin. — In the tenth chapter they are reported to assert that the souls which are put into human bodies were without a body, and in the heavenly […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 684

Footnotes

(g) ‹humanorum corporum› · printed under cols 683–684

Vindebon. collect. 5, dicere diaboli esse figmentum. Vat. collect. 3 cum antea Vulgat., diaboli dicere esse figmentum. Mox Vat. Reg. collect. 1, ope daemonum. Hisp. et Isid., per daemones. In antiquiori autem Vindebon. Hisp., per daemonum, corrupte, ubi per scriptum apparet ex opere vel opera, ut in aliis codd. legitur.

The Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5, "dicere diaboli esse figmentum" ("to say [it] is a fabrication of the devil"). Vatican collection 3, with the Vulgate [edition] earlier, "diaboli dicere esse figmentum". Next, Vatican Regina collection 1, "ope daemonum" ("by the help of demons"). The Hispana and the Isidorian, "per daemones" ("by demons"). But in the older Vienna Hispana, "per daemonum", corruptly, where "per" is evidently written from "opere" or "opera", as is read in other manuscripts.

(h) ‹quia› · printed under col 684

Ita codd. septem a Quesn. laudati in margine, et nostri multo plures cum editione Surii et Nicolini. Al., concreatio. Mox dignitati delent mss. Grim. et Thuan. ejusdem Quesn.

So seven manuscripts cited by Quesnel in the margin, and many more of ours, with the edition of Surius and of Nicolini. Others, "concreatio" ("co-creation"). Next, the Grimani manuscript and the Thuanean one of the same Quesnel delete "dignitati".

(i) ‹nascitur,› · printed under col 684

Mss. Vat. Hisp. et Isid. cum tribus aliis, ad illam conditionem. Paulo post ex mss. Vindebon. collect. 5 et Vat., Hisp. et Isid., revocavimus lectionem editorum ante Quesn., substantia cujus loco Quesnellus. Dein substantiam, et in margine: Al., subsistentia. Dein manente quidem in illo, in Vat. 5845.

The Vatican Hispana and Isidorian manuscripts, with three others, "ad illam conditionem" ("to that creation"). A little after, from the Vienna manuscript of collection 5 and the Vatican, Hispana and Isidorian, we have restored the reading of the editors before Quesnel, "substantia", in place of which Quesnel [has] "substantiam", and in the margin: others, "subsistentia". Then "manente quidem in illo" in Vatican 5845.

(j) ‹subveniente, quo› · printed under col 684

Quesnellus ex Spiritu sancto. Restituimus vulgatam lectionem, quippe quam codd, praestantissimi Vat. Reg. colect. 1, Vindebon. collect. 5, nec non Hisp. et Isid. cum tribus aliis Vatt. confirmant.

Quesnel, "ex Spiritu sancto" ("of the Holy Spirit"). We have restored the common reading, since the most excellent manuscripts, Vatican Regina collection 1 and Vienna collection 5, and also the Hispana and the Isidorian with three other Vatican [manuscripts], confirm it.

(k) ‹inseruntur fuisse› · printed under cols 684–685

Editi ante Quesn. cum plerisque etiam vetustis codd., in corpore, sed perperam, ut Quesnellus optime statuit not. 7. Emendationem ejus, quam reperit in tribus tantum mss. Thuan. et Trecopith. collect. 5, et Heravall. Isidori collect. 12, nos confirmamus aliis codicibus Vat. collect 3, Vindebon. collect. 5, Vercell. et Vat. 1353 collect. 8, alio Vat. est Veneto S. Marci collect. 12, et Vat. Ottobon. 297 collect. 23. Paulo post ob hoc deest in Vat. collect. 24. Post pauca Vat.. Hisp. et Isid., cum tribus aliis, in suae qualitatis principes incidisse, et per aereas ac sidereas potestates alias in diversis corporibus esse conclusas. Vindeb. Hisp., in se qualitatis... alias inversis corporibus; caetera ut in lectione praecedenti.

The editions before Quesnel, with most manuscripts, even old ones, "in corpore" ("in a body"), but wrongly, as Quesnel very well established in note 7. His emendation, which he found in only three manuscripts, the Thuanean and the Pithou manuscript of Troyes of collection 5, and the Herouval manuscript of the Isidorian collection 12, we confirm with other manuscripts: Vatican collection 3, Vienna collection 5, the Vercelli and Vatican 1353 of collection 8, another Vatican [manuscript] and the Venetian of St Mark of collection 12, and Vatican Ottoboni 297 of collection 23. A little after, "ob hoc" is missing in Vatican collection 24. Shortly after, the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, with three others, "in suae qualitatis principes incidisse, et per aereas ac sidereas potestates alias in diversis corporibus esse conclusas" ("to have fallen upon principalities of their own quality, and through the powers of the air and the stars to have been shut up, some in different bodies"). The Vienna Hispana, "in se qualitatis... alias inversis corporibus"; the rest as in the preceding reading.

Page

  • running head: MAGNI EPISTOLAE. 684 (across the page from col 683, "S. LEONIS …")
  • marginal letters: A ‹non est illic libertas›; B ‹702 Cap. IV. Filios›; C ‹promissionis filius dicit›; D (in the footnotes) ‹Thuan. ejusdem Quesn.›
  • old-edition numerals: 702 before ‹Cap. IV. Filios promissionis›
  • signature: none
  • other: (g) begins under col 683 and continues at the head of col 684's notes; (k) runs over into the notes of col 685.
PL 54:685
sti habitatione peccasse, atque ob hoc a sublimibus ad inferiora delapsas, in diversae qualitatis principes incidisse, et per aerias ac sidereas potestates, alias duriores, alias mitiores, corporibus esse conclusas, sorte diversas et conditione dissimili: ut quidquid in hac vita varie et inaequaliter provenit, ex praecedentibus cansis videatur accidere. Quam impietatis fabulam ex multorum sibi erroribus texuerunt; sed omnes eos catholica fides a corpore suae unitatis abscidit, constanter praedicans atque veraciter, quod animae hominum, priusquam suis inspirarentur corporibus, non fuere, nec ab alio incorporantur nisi ab opifice Deo, qui et ipsarum est creator et corporum; et quia per primi hominis praevaricationem tota humani generis propago vitiata sit, neminem posse a conditione veteris hominis liberari, nisi per sacramentum baptismatis Christi, in quo nulla est discretio renatorum, dicente Apostolo Quicumque enim in Christo baptizati estis, Christum induistis. Non est Judaeus, neque Graecus; non est servus, neque liber: non est masculus, neque feminas omnes enim vos unum estis in Christo Jesu (Gal. III, 27, 28).
[…] dwelling to have sinned, and on this account, having slipped down from the heights to the lower regions, to have fallen upon principalities of differing quality, and to have been shut up in bodies through the powers of the air and of the stars, some harsher, some milder, differing in lot and unlike in condition: so that whatever turns out variously and unequally in this life seems to happen from preceding causes. This fable of impiety they have woven for themselves out of the errors of many; but the catholic faith has cut all of them off from the body of its unity, preaching constantly and truthfully that the souls of men did not exist before they were breathed into their bodies, and are not embodied by any other than God the maker, Who is the creator both of the souls themselves and of the bodies; and that, because through the transgression of the first man the whole offspring of the human race has been vitiated, no one can be set free from the condition of the old man except through the sacrament of the baptism of Christ, in which there is no distinction among the reborn, as the Apostle says: For as many of you as have been baptized in Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek; there is neither slave nor free: there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus (Gal. 3:27–28).
Quid ergo hic agunt cursus siderum, quid figmenta fatorum, quid mundanarum rerum mobilisstatus, et inquieta diversitas? Ecce tot impares gratia Dei facit aequales, qui inter quoslibet vitae hujus labores, si fideles permanent, miseri esse non possunt apostolicum illud in omni tentatione dicentes: Quis nos separabit a charitate Christi? tribulatio? an angustia? an persecutio? an fames? an nuditas? an periculum? an gladius? Sicut scriptum est, quia propter te morte afficimur tota die, aestimati sumus ut oves occisionis. Sed in his omnibus superamus per eum qui nos dilexit (Rom. VIII, 35, 36). Et ideo Ecclesia, quae corpus est Christi, nihil de mundi inaequalitatibus metuit, quia nihil de bonis temporalibus concupiscit; nec timet inani strepitu fatorum gravari, quae patientia tribulationum novit augeri.
What then do the courses of the stars do here, what the fabrications of the fates, what the changeableness of worldly things and their restless diversity? Behold, the grace of God makes equal so many who are unequal, who, amid whatever labours of this life, if they remain faithful, cannot be wretched, saying in every temptation that word of the Apostle: Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? tribulation? or distress? or persecution? or famine? or nakedness? or peril? or the sword? As it is written: For your sake we are put to death all the day long, we are counted as sheep for the slaughter. But in all these things we overcome through Him Who loved us (Rom. 8:35–36). And therefore the Church, which is the body of Christ, fears nothing from the inequalities of the world, because it covets nothing of temporal goods; nor does it fear to be weighed down by the empty din of the fates, since it knows how to be increased by the patience of tribulations.
Cap. XI. Fatalem necessitatem hominibus imponunt. — Undecima ipsorum blasphemia est, qua fatalibus stellis et animas hominum, et corpora
Chap. XI. They impose a fatal necessity on men. — Their eleventh blasphemy is that by which both the souls of men and their bodies, to the fatal stars, […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 685

Footnotes

(k) continued from col 684, set in n684.

(a) ‹priusquam suis› · printed under col 685

Vat. Reg., inspirentur.

Vatican Regina, "inspirentur" ("are breathed into", present subjunctive).

(b) ‹Quicumque› · printed under col 685

Ms. Vindeb. Hisp. debet enim.

The Vienna Hispana manuscript lacks "enim".

(c) ‹(Gal. III, 27, 28).› · printed under col 685 (the call is printed "(e)" in the text)

Vat. collect. 24, Quid enim agunt. Dein mobiles status in Vindebon. collect. 5. Postea fecit aequales in Vindeb. Hisp. et duobus Vatt. collect. 21.

Vatican collection 24, "Quid enim agunt" ("For what do [they] do"). Then "mobiles status" ("changeable states") in the Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5. Afterwards, "fecit aequales" ("made equal") in the Vienna Hispana and two Vatican [manuscripts] of collection 21.

(d) ‹miseri esse non possunt› · printed under col 685

Codd. Vat., Hisp. et Isid., cum tribus aliis praemisso puncto, sic praeferunt. Quot (al., quod apostolicum illud in omni tentatione monet (al., docet) dicens: Quis nos, etc. Dein iidem codd. et Vindeb. Hisp., mortificamur pro morte afficimur.

The Vatican Hispana and Isidorian manuscripts, with three others, putting a full stop before, present it thus: "Quot" (others, "quod") "apostolicum illud in omni tentatione monet" (others, "docet") "dicens: Quis nos", etc. ("[That is] what that apostolic word counsels [others: teaches] in every temptation, saying: Who shall …"). Then the same manuscripts and the Vienna Hispana, "mortificamur" ("we are mortified") for "morte afficimur".

(e) ‹nihil de bonis› · printed under col 685

Ms. Vat. collect. 83, aliud collect., et codd. collect. 24, cum antiquioribus editis, corporalibus, Post pauca, quia patientia, in Vindebon. Hisp.

The Vatican manuscript of collection 83 [sic], another of the collection, and the manuscripts of collection 24, with the older editions, "corporalibus" ("bodily"). Shortly after, "quia patientia" ("because by patience") in the Vienna Hispana.

(f) ‹blasphemia est, qua› · printed under cols 685–686

Ms. Vindebon. Hisp. fataliter. Dein, ut homines paganorum erroribus in mss. Vat., Hisp. et Isid., ac tribus aliis codd. In Vindebon. Hisp., ut hominibus, ex quo emendatum posterius in laudatis codicibus, ut homines.

The Vienna Hispana manuscript, "fataliter" ("fatally"). Then "ut homines paganorum erroribus" ("that men … in the errors of the pagans") in the Vatican Hispana and Isidorian manuscripts and three other manuscripts. In the Vienna Hispana, "ut hominibus", from which the later emendation in the manuscripts cited, "ut homines".

Page

  • running head: 685 EPISTOLA XV. (across the page with col 686)
  • marginal letters: A ‹sti habitatione peccasse›; B ‹nisi per sacramentum›; C ‹afficimur tota die›; D (in the footnotes) ‹esse conclusas. Vindeb. Hisp.›
  • old-edition numerals: 703 after ‹videatur›; 704 before ‹Cap. XI.›
  • signature: none
  • other: the text's first call after (b) is printed "(e)" but answers to note (c).
PL 54:686
opinantur obstringi, per quam amentiam necesse est ut omnibus paganorum erroribus implicati, et faventia sibi, ut putant, sidera colere, et adversantia studeant mitigare. Verum ista sectantibus nullus in Ecclesia catholica locus est: quoniam qui se talibus persuasionibus dedit, a Christi corpore totus abscessit.
[…] they suppose to be bound; through which madness it must be that, entangled in all the errors of the pagans, they are eager both to worship the stars which, as they think, favour them, and to appease those which oppose them. But for those who follow these things there is no place in the catholic Church: since he who has given himself to such persuasions has departed wholly from the body of Christ.
Cap. XII. Animas certis potestatibus subjibiant, aliis corporum membra. — Duodecimum inter haec illud est, quod sub aliis potestatibus partes animae, sub aliis corporis membra describunt; et qualitates interiorum praesulum in patriarcharum nominibus statuunt, quibus e diverso signa siderea, quorum virtuti corpora subjiciantur, opponunt. Et in his omnibus inextricabili se errore praepediunt, non audientes dicentem Apostolum: Videte ne quis vos decipiat per philosophiam et inanem fallaciam secundum traditionem hominum, secundum elementa mundi, et non secundum Christum: quia in ipsos inhabitat omnis plenitudo Divinitatis corporaliter, et estis in illo repleti, qui est caput omnis principatus et potestatis (Coloss. II, 8-10).
Chap. XII. They subject souls to certain powers, and the members of bodies to others. — The twelfth among these is this, that they assign the parts of the soul to some powers, the members of the body to others; and they set the qualities of the inner governors in the names of the patriarchs, to whom, on the opposite side, they oppose the starry signs, to whose power bodies are to be subject. And in all these things they entangle themselves in an inextricable error, not hearing the Apostle when he says: See that no one deceive you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the elements of the world, and not according to Christ: for in Him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, and you are filled in Him, Who is the head of all principality and power (Col. 2:8–10).
Et iterum: Nemo vos seducat volens in humilitate et religione angelorum, quae non vidit ambulans, frustra inflatus sensu carnis suae, non tenens caput, ex quo totum corpus per nexus et conjunctiones subministratum et constructum crescit in augmentum Dei (Ibid. 18, 19). Quid ergo opus est in cor admittere quod lex non docuit, quod prophetia non cecinit, quod Evangelii veritas non praedicavit, quod apostolica doctrina non tradidit? Sed haec apta sunt eorum mentibus, de quibus apostolus dicit: Erit enim tempus, cum sanam doctrinam non sustinebant, sed ad sua desideria coacervabunt sibi magistros prurientes auribus; et a veritate quidem auditum avertent, ad fabulas autem convertentur (II Tim. IV, 3, 4), Nihil itaque nobiscum commune habeant, qui talia audent vel docere, vel credere, et quibuslibet modis nituntur astruere quod substantia carnis ab spe resurrectionis aliena sit, atque ita omne sacramentum Incarnationis Christi resolvunt: quia indignum fuit
And again: Let no one seduce you, willing [to walk] in humility and the worship of angels, walking in what he has not seen, vainly puffed up by the sense of his flesh, not holding the head, from which the whole body, supplied and built up through joints and bands, grows unto the increase of God (ibid. 18, 19). What need is there, then, to admit into the heart what the law did not teach, what prophecy did not sing, what the truth of the Gospel did not preach, what the apostolic teaching did not hand down? But these things suit the minds of those of whom the Apostle says: For there shall be a time when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires they will heap up to themselves teachers, having itching ears; and they will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned to fables (2 Tim. 4:3–4). Let them therefore have nothing in common with us who dare either to teach or to believe such things, and who strive by whatever means to establish that the substance of the flesh is a stranger to the hope of the resurrection, and so undo the whole mystery of the Incarnation of Christ: because it was unworthy […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 686

Footnotes

(f) continued from col 685, set in n685.

(g) ‹in Ecclesia catholica› · printed under col 686

Codd. Hisp. et Isid. cum Vat. collect. 24, locus sit. Mox, quoniam quisquis talibus persuasionibus sit deditus in quinque nostris codicibus inferioris notae.

The Hispana and Isidorian manuscripts, with Vatican collection 24, "locus sit" ("let there be a place", subjunctive). Next, "quoniam quisquis talibus persuasionibus sit deditus" ("since whoever is given over to such persuasions") in five of our manuscripts of lower standing.

(h) ‹statuunt, quibus› · printed under col 686 (the call is printed "(e)" in the text)

Duo Vatt. mss. collect. 21, et diversa signa. Mox, subjiciuntur in duobus Vindebonensibus.

Two Vatican manuscripts of collection 21, "et diversa signa" ("and diverse signs"). Next, "subjiciuntur" ("are subjected", indicative) in two Vienna manuscripts.

(i) ‹per philosophiam et inanem› · printed under col 686 (the note is lettered "(j)")

Unus Vat., gloriam. In textu sequenti uterque codex Hisp, et Vat. Isid., totum corpus compactum et conjunctione subministratum.

One Vatican [manuscript], "gloriam" ("glory"). In the text following, both manuscripts, the Hispana and the Vatican Isidorian, "totum corpus compactum et conjunctione subministratum" ("the whole body compacted and supplied by joining").

(j) ‹Sed haec› · printed under col 686

Ita omnes codd. Quesn. et nostri, excepto Vat. collect. 24, in quo cum anterioribus vulgatis operta sunt. Post pauca, de quibus Apostolus loquitur dicens, in Vat. Reg. collect. 1, in Vindebon. collect. 5, in Hisp. et Isid., ac tribus aliis codicibus.

So all the manuscripts of Quesnel and ours, except Vatican collection 24, in which, with the earlier printed editions, "operta sunt" ("are hidden"). Shortly after, "de quibus Apostolus loquitur dicens" ("of whom the Apostle speaks, saying") in Vatican Regina collection 1, in the Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5, in the Hispana and the Isidorian, and in three other manuscripts.

(k) ‹Nihil itaque› · printed under col 686

Mss. Vat. collect. 21, vobiscum. Mox communicabunt pro commune habeant in Vat. Hisp. et Isid. codd., qui paulo post omittunt credere et. Vindebonensis Hisp. delet vel credere.

The Vatican manuscripts of collection 21, "vobiscum" ("with you"). Next, "communicabunt" ("they shall share") for "commune habeant" in the Vatican Hispana and Isidorian manuscripts, which a little after omit "credere et". The Vienna Hispana deletes "vel credere".

(l) ‹Christi resolvunt:› · printed under cols 686–687

Duo mss. Vatt. collect. 21 et Justelli codex a Labbeo citatus, quia sicut dignum fuit integrum hominem suscipi, sic dignum erat integrum hominem liberari. Idem legitur in Vat. Hisp. et Isid., hac exceptione quod per errorem primo loco habent, sicut indignum.

Two Vatican manuscripts of collection 21 and Justel's manuscript cited by Labbe, "quia sicut dignum fuit integrum hominem suscipi, sic dignum erat integrum hominem liberari" ("because just as it was fitting for the whole man to be taken up, so it was fitting for the whole man to be set free"). The same is read in the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, with this exception, that in the first place they have by mistake "sicut indignum".

Page

  • running head: …STOLA XV. 686 (across the page from col 685, "EPISTOLA")
  • marginal letters: A ‹opinantur obstringi›; B ‹tes dicentem Apostolum›; C ‹eorum mentibus, de quibus›; D (in the footnotes) ‹deditus in quinque›
  • old-edition numerals: 705 before ‹enim tempus›
  • signature: none
  • other: the call before "e diverso" is printed "(e)" but answers to note (h); the note answering to call (i) is lettered "(j)", followed by the true (j).
PL 54:687
integrum hominem suscipi, si indignum erat integrum liberari.
[…] for the whole man to be taken up, if it was unworthy for the whole [man] to be set free.
Cap. XIII. Qualem Scripturarum scientiam astruant? — Tertio decimo loco positum est eosdem dicere quod omne corpus Scripturarum canonicarum sub patriarcharum nominibus accipiendum sit: quia illae duodecim virtutes, quae reformationem hominis interioris operantur, in horum vocabulis indicentur, sine qua scientia nullam animam posse assequi, ut in eam substantiam de qua prodiit reformetur. Sed hanc impiam vanitatem despectui habet Christiana sapientia, quae novit verae Deitatis inviolabilem et inconvertibilem esse naturam; animam autem, sive in corpore viventem, sive a corpore separatam, multis passionibus subjacere. Quae utique si de divina esset essentia, nihil adversi posset incidere. Et ideo incomparabiliter aliud Creator, et aliud creatura. Ille enim semper idem est, et nulla varietate mutatur, haec autem mutabilis est, etiam non mutata, quia ut non mutetur, donatum poterit habere, non proprium.
Chap. XIII. What kind of knowledge of the Scriptures do they assert? — In the thirteenth place it is set down that the same men say that the whole body of the canonical Scriptures is to be received under the names of the patriarchs: because those twelve powers which work the reformation of the inner man are indicated in their names, and without this knowledge no soul can attain to be reformed into that substance from which it came forth. But this impious vanity Christian wisdom holds in contempt, which knows that the nature of the true Godhead is inviolable and unchangeable, but that the soul, whether living in the body or separated from the body, is subject to many passions. Which, if it were of the divine essence, could certainly suffer nothing adverse. And therefore the Creator is one thing and the creature another, beyond all comparison. For He is always the same and is changed by no variation, but the creature is changeable, even when not changed, because its not being changed it will be able to have as a gift, not as its own.
Cap. XIV. Siderum et signorum potestati hominem subjiciunt. — Sub quarto decimo vero capitulo, de statu corporis sentire dicuntur quod sub potestate siderum atque signorum pro terrena qualitate teneatur, et ideo multa in sanctis libris, quae ad exteriorem hominem pertineant, reperiri, ut in ipsis Scripturis inter divinam terrenamque naturam quaedam sibi repugnet adversitas: et aliud sit quod sibi vindicent animae praesules, aliud quod corporis conditores. Quae fabulae ideo disseruntur ut et anima divinae affirmetur esse substantiae, et caro credatur malae esse naturae; quoniam et ipsum mundum cum elementis suis non opus Dei boni, sed conditionem mali profitentur auctoris; atque ut haec mendaciorum suorum sacrilegia bonis titulis colorarent, omnia pene divina eloquia sensuum nefandorum immissione violarunt.
Chap. XIV. They subject man to the power of the stars and signs. — Under the fourteenth chapter they are said to hold concerning the state of the body that it is held under the power of the stars and signs on account of its earthly quality, and that therefore many things are found in the holy books which pertain to the outer man, so that in the Scriptures themselves a certain opposition between the divine and the earthly nature fights against itself: and one thing is what the governors of the soul claim for themselves, another what the makers of the body [claim]. These fables are set forth so that the soul may be affirmed to be of the divine substance, and the flesh believed to be of an evil nature; since they profess that the world itself with its elements is not the work of the good God, but the creation of an evil author; and so that they might colour these sacrileges of their lies with good titles, they have violated almost all the divine oracles by inserting abominable meanings.
Editors' notes and page, col. 687

Footnotes

(l) continued from col 686, set in n686.

(a) ‹in horum vocabulis› · printed under col 687

Vat. Hisp. et Isid., dedicentur. Vindebon. Hisp., dicentur.

The Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, "dedicentur" ("are dedicated"). The Vienna Hispana, "dicentur" ("will be called").

(b) ‹sapientia, quae novit› · printed under col 687

In codd. Vat. Hisp. et Isid. deletur verae. Mox pro inconvertibilem cod. Vat. collect, 24 et editio Rainaudi 1671 habent incorruptibilem.

In the Vatican Hispana and Isidorian manuscripts "verae" is deleted. Next, for "inconvertibilem" the Vatican manuscript of collection 24 and Raynaud's edition of 1671 have "incorruptibilem" ("incorruptible").

(c) ‹Quae utique› · printed under col 687

Ita cum Quesn. nostri codices. Alias, si divinae esset essentiae. Post pauca pro voce incomparabiliter a Quesnello recepta plerique nostri codices habent cum anterioribus vulgatis ineffabiliter. At congruentiorem lectionem excludere ausi non sumus, quae praefertur in antiquissimo Vat. 5845. Mox cod. Vercell., aliud est Creator. Duo Vatt. cum editis ante Quesn., aliud Creator est, aliud creatura. Sub finem capitis datum pro donatum in antiquissimo Vat. collect. 8 et alio Vat. collect. 24 cum vetustioribus editionibus.

So our manuscripts, with Quesnel. Elsewhere, "si divinae esset essentiae". Shortly after, for the word "incomparabiliter" adopted by Quesnel, most of our manuscripts, with the earlier printed editions, have "ineffabiliter" ("ineffably"). But we have not dared to exclude the more fitting reading, which is presented in the very ancient Vatican 5845. Next, the Vercelli manuscript, "aliud est Creator". Two Vatican [manuscripts], with the editions before Quesnel, "aliud Creator est, aliud creatura". Towards the end of the chapter, "datum" for "donatum" in the very ancient Vatican [manuscript] of collection 8 and another Vatican of collection 24, with the older editions.

(d) ‹in ipsis Scripturis› · printed under col 687

Vat. Hisp. et Isid., inter divinam, vel terrenam, humanamque naturam. Post nonnulla seruntur pro disseruntur in Vat. 5845.

The Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, "inter divinam, vel terrenam, humanamque naturam" ("between the divine, or the earthly and human, nature"). After some words, "seruntur" ("are sown") for "disseruntur" in Vatican 5845.

(e) called in col 688, printed under col 687: set in n688.

Page

  • running head: 687 S. LEONIS MAGNI (across the page with col 688)
  • marginal letters: A ‹integrum hominem suscipi›; B ‹incomparabiliter aliud Creator›; C ‹divinae affirmetur esse›; D (in the footnotes) ‹set essentiae. Post pauca›
  • old-edition numerals: 706 before ‹Cap. XIV.›
  • signature: none
  • other: none
PL 54:688
Cap. XV. Scripturas veras adulterant, falsas inducunt. — De qua re quinti decimi capituli sermo conqueritur, et praesumptionem diabolicam merito detestatur: quia et nos istud veracium testium relatione comperimus, et multos corruptissimos eorum codices, qui canonici titularentur, invenimus. Quomodo enim decipere simplices possent, nisi venenata pocula quodam melle praelinirent, ne usquequaque sentirentur insuavia, quae essent futura mortifera? Curandum ergo est, et sacerdotali diligentia maxime providendum, ut falsati codices, et a sincera veritate discordes, in nullo usu lectionis habeantur. Apocryphae autem scripturae, quae sub nominibus apostolorum multarum habent seminarium falsitatum, non solum interdicendae, sed etiam ponitus auferendae sunt, atque ignibus concremandae. Quamvis enim sint in illis quaedam quae videantur speciem habere pietatis, numquam tamen vacua sunt venenis, et per fabularum illecebras hoc latenter operantur, ut mirabilium narratione seductos laqueis cujuscumque erroris involvant. Unde si quis episcoporum, vel apocrypha haberi per domos non prohibuerit, vel sub canonicorum nomine eos codices in Ecclesia permiserit legi, qui Priscilliani adulterina sunt emendatione vitiati, haereticum se noverit judicandum: quoniam QUI ALIOS ab errore non revocat, seipsum errare demonstrat.
Chap. XV. They adulterate the true Scriptures and bring in false ones. — Of this matter the discourse of the fifteenth chapter complains, and deservedly detests the diabolical presumption: for we too have learned this by the report of truthful witnesses, and have found many utterly corrupted manuscripts of theirs which were entitled canonical. For how could they deceive the simple, unless they smeared the poisoned cups beforehand with a kind of honey, so that what was going to be deadly might not be felt anywhere as unpleasant? Care must therefore be taken, and provision made above all with priestly diligence, that falsified manuscripts, at variance with the pure truth, be kept in no use for reading. And the apocryphal writings, which under the names of the apostles contain a seed-bed of many falsehoods, are not only to be forbidden, but also to be removed altogether and burnt in the fire. For although there are some things in them which seem to have the appearance of piety, yet they are never free of poisons, and through the allurements of fables they secretly work this, that they entangle in the snares of every sort of error those who have been seduced by the narration of marvels. Hence if any of the bishops either does not forbid apocryphal writings to be kept in houses, or permits those manuscripts to be read in church under the name of canonical ones which have been vitiated by the adulterous emendation of Priscillian, let him know that he is to be judged a heretic: since HE WHO DOES NOT RECALL OTHERS from error shows that he himself errs.
Cap. XVI. De Dictinii scriptis. — Postremo autem capitulo hoc prodidit justa querimonia, quod Dictinii tractatus quos secundum Priscilliani dogma conscripsit, a multis cum veneratione legerentur, cum, si aliquid memoriae Dictinii tribuendum putant, reparationem ejus magis debeant amare quam lapsum. Non ergo Dictinium, sed Priscillianum legunt, et illud probant, quod errans docuit, non quod correctus elegit. Sed nemo hoc impune praesumat, nec inter catholicos censeatur quisquis utitur scriptis, non ab Ecclesia solum catholica, sed etiam a suo
Chap. XVI. On the writings of Dictinius. — In the last chapter, moreover, a just complaint has brought this to light, that the treatises of Dictinius, which he wrote according to the dogma of Priscillian, were being read by many with veneration, whereas, if they think something is owed to the memory of Dictinius, they ought rather to love his restoration than his fall. It is not Dictinius, then, that they read, but Priscillian, and they approve what he taught when in error, not what he chose when corrected. But let no one presume this with impunity, nor let anyone be reckoned among catholics who uses writings, not only by the catholic Church, but also by their own […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 688

Footnotes

(e) ‹detestatur: quia› · printed under col 687

Cod. Vindebon. collect. 5, et nostrorum veracium testium. Alius Vindebon. Hisp. et unus Vat., testimonium pro testium. Deinde mss. Vatt. collect. 21 et 24 cum antiquioribus editis, titulantur.

The Vienna manuscript of collection 5, "et nostrorum veracium testium" ("and of our truthful witnesses"). Another, the Vienna Hispana, and one Vatican [manuscript], "testimonium" ("testimony") for "testium". Then the Vatican manuscripts of collections 21 and 24, with the older editions, "titulantur" ("are entitled", indicative).

(f) ‹multarum habent› · printed under col 688

Vat. cod. collect. 3 et in decreto de Apocryphis, quod ex hoc loco sumptum in appendice dabimus, semina Vat. Reg. collect. 1 et Vindebon. Hisp., seminaria. Dein intercidendae pro interdicendae in mss. Grim. et Vict. Quesnelli.

The Vatican manuscript of collection 3, and in the decree on the Apocrypha, which was taken from this passage and which we shall give in the appendix, "semina" ("seeds"); Vatican Regina collection 1 and the Vienna Hispana, "seminaria" ("seed-beds"). Then "intercidendae" ("to be cut off") for "interdicendae" in Quesnel's Grimani and Saint-Victor manuscripts.

(g) ‹vacua sunt venenis,› · printed under col 688

Vat. Hisp. et Isid., sed per fabularum. Vindebon. collect. 5, et per famulorum. Paulo post, pro narratione, tres Vatt. cod., narrationibus. Mox in Vat. 5845, seducti laqueis implicentur erroris. Tres codd. in decreto de Apocryphis, seducti laqueis cujuscumque erroris implicentur.

The Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, "sed per fabularum" ("but through … of fables"). The Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5, "et per famulorum" ("and through … of servants"). A little after, for "narratione", three Vatican manuscripts, "narrationibus" ("narrations"). Next in Vatican 5845, "seducti laqueis implicentur erroris" ("being seduced, they are entangled in the snares of error"). Three manuscripts, in the decree on the Apocrypha, "seducti laqueis cujuscumque erroris implicentur" ("being seduced, they are entangled in the snares of every sort of error").

(h) ‹apocrypha haberi› · printed under col 688

In mss. collect. 21 et in decreto de Apocryphis deest per domos. Deinde corrupti pro vitiati in Vat. Hisp. Isid. et quatuor aliis codicibus, atque in editis ante Quesn.

In the manuscripts of collection 21 and in the decree on the Apocrypha "per domos" ("in houses") is missing. Then "corrupti" ("corrupted") for "vitiati" in the Vatican Hispana and Isidorian and four other manuscripts, and in the editions before Quesnel.

(i) ‹De Dictinii scriptis. —› · printed under col 688

Vat. Hisp. et I⟨s⟩id.: Post hoc prodidit justa querimonia. Mox, pro Dictinii, Quesn. in margine: Al., Dicticinii. De Dictinio autem ejusque tractatibus vide not. 8 Quesn. et observationes quas eidem subjiciemus. Dein, qui si aliquid in Vat. Hisp. et Isid., pro cum si aliquid.

The Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian: "Post hoc prodidit justa querimonia" ("After this a just complaint brought to light"). Next, for "Dictinii", Quesnel in the margin: others, "Dicticinii". On Dictinius and his treatises see Quesnel's note 8 and the observations which we shall append to it. Then "qui si aliquid" in the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, for "cum si aliquid".

(j) ‹non quod› · printed under col 688

Dictinii correctio Toletano I subjicitur, eamque vindicabimus in observat, ad not. 8 Quesnelli. Mox pro impune laudati codices Vat. Hisp. et Isid., imponere. Dein pro scriptis alias scripturis.

The correction of Dictinius is appended to [the Council of] Toledo I, and we shall vindicate it in the observations on Quesnel's note 8. Next, for "impune", the cited manuscripts, the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, "imponere". Then, for "scriptis", elsewhere "scripturis".

Page

  • running head: MAGNI EPISTOLAE. 688 (across the page from col 687, "S. LEONIS …")
  • marginal letters: A ‹Cap. XV. Scripturas veras›; B ‹tus auferendae sunt›; C ‹cum, si aliquid memoriae›; D (in the footnotes) ‹in decreto de Apocryphis, seducti›
  • old-edition numerals: 707 after ‹seminarium›
  • signature: none
  • other: none
PL 54:689
auctore damnatis. Non sit perversis liberum simulare quod fingunt, nec sub velamine nominis Christiani, decretorum imperialium statuta declinent. Ideo enim ad Ecclesiam catholicam cum tanta cordis diversitate conveniunt, ut et quos possunt suos faciant, et legum severitatem, dum se nostros mentiuntur, effugiant. Faciunt hoc Priscillianistae, faciunt Manichaei, quorum cum istis tam foederata sunt corda, ut solis nominibus discreti, sacrilegiis autem suis inveniantur uniti: quia etsi vetus Testamentum, quod isti se suscipere simulant, Manichaei refutant, ad unum tamen finem utrorumque tendit intentio, cum quod illi abdicando impugnant, isti recipiendo corrumpunt.
[…] author. Let it not be free to the perverse to feign what they pretend, nor let them evade the statutes of the imperial decrees under the veil of the Christian name. For this is why they come to the catholic Church with so great a divergence of heart: so that they may make their own whomever they can, and escape the severity of the laws while they falsely claim to be ours. The Priscillianists do this, the Manichaeans do it, whose hearts are so leagued with these that, distinguished by names alone, they are found united in their sacrileges: for although the Manichaeans reject the Old Testament, which these pretend to receive, yet the aim of both tends to one end, since what the former attack by repudiating, the latter corrupt by receiving.
In exsecrabilibus autem mysteriis eorum, quae quanto immundiora sunt tanto diligentius occuluntur, unum prorsus nefas est, una est obscenitas et similis turpitudo. Quam etsi eloqui erubescimus, sollicitissimis tamen inquisitionibus indagatam, et Manichaeorum, qui comprehensi fuerant, confessione detectam, ad publicam fecimus pervenire notitiam: ne ullo modo posset dubium videri quod in judicio nostro, cui non solum frequentissima praesentia sacerdotum, sed etiam illustrium virorum dignitas, et pars quaedam senatus ac plebis interfuit ipsorum qui omne facinus perpetrarant ore reseratum est; sicut ea quae ad dilectionem tuam nunc direximus gesta demonstrant. Quod autem de Manichaeorum foedissimo scelere, hoc etiam de Priscillianistarum incestissima consuetudine olim compertum multumque vulgatum est. Qui enim per omnia sunt impietate sensuum pares, non possunt in sacris suis esse dissimiles.
In their execrable mysteries, moreover, which are hidden the more carefully the more unclean they are, there is altogether one wickedness, one obscenity and a like shamefulness. Although we blush to speak of it, yet, having tracked it down by most careful inquiries and uncovered it by the confession of the Manichaeans who had been arrested, we have brought it to public knowledge: lest it could in any way seem doubtful, since in our court, at which there were present not only a very numerous attendance of bishops, but also the dignity of illustrious men and some part of the senate and people, it was laid open by the mouth of those very persons who had perpetrated every crime; as the acts which we have now sent to your Charity show. And what [was found] concerning the most foul crime of the Manichaeans, this has also long since been discovered and widely published concerning the most incestuous practice of the Priscillianists. For those who are in all things equal in the impiety of their opinions cannot be unlike in their rites.
Decursis itaque omnibus quae libelli series comprehendit, et a quibus commonitorii forma non discrepat, sufficienter, ut opinor, ostendimus quid de his quae ad nos fraternitas tua retulit censeamus, et quam non sit ferendum, si tam profanis erroribus etiam quorumdam sacerdotum corda consentiunt,
Having thus gone through all the things which the sequence of the booklet contains, and from which the form of the memorandum does not differ, we have sufficiently shown, as I think, what we judge concerning the things which your Fraternity has reported to us, and how intolerable it is if the hearts even of certain bishops consent to such profane errors, […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 689

Footnotes

(a) ‹auctore damnatis.› · printed under col 689

Iidem codd., Ne sit; et postea, ne sub velamine. Deinde omittunt cordis, et post pauca, pro dum se nostros, habent cum Vindebon. Hisp., dum sensus nostros.

The same manuscripts, "Ne sit"; and afterwards, "ne sub velamine". Then they omit "cordis", and shortly after, for "dum se nostros", they have, with the Vienna Hispana, "dum sensus nostros" ("while [they feign] our opinions").

(b) ‹cum quod› · printed under col 689

Sic ex Vat. Reg. collect. 1 Vindebon., collect. 5 utrisque Hisp. et Vat. Isid., ac tribus aliis codd. Quesnellus isti, ut in aliis mss. reperimus. Alii editi, isti recipiendo corrumpunt, illi abdicando impugnant. Merlinus, isti abdicando impugnant, illi recipiendo corrumpunt. Praetulimus lectionem potiorum codicum, qua isti vetus Testamentum recipientes Priscillianistae intelliguntur, de quibus paulo ante Leo scripsit: Isti se suscipere simulant; vox autem illi ad Manichaeos refertur.

So from Vatican Regina collection 1, the Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5, both Hispana manuscripts and the Vatican Isidorian, and three other manuscripts. Quesnel [has] "isti", as we have found in other manuscripts. Other editions, "isti recipiendo corrumpunt, illi abdicando impugnant". Merlin, "isti abdicando impugnant, illi recipiendo corrumpunt". We have preferred the reading of the better manuscripts, by which "isti" is understood of the Priscillianists who receive the Old Testament, of whom Leo wrote a little before: "Isti se suscipere simulant"; while the word "illi" refers to the Manichaeans.

(c) ‹tanto diligentius› · printed under col 689

Alias, occultantur.

Elsewhere, "occultantur" ("are concealed").

(d) ‹ad dilectionem› · printed under col 689

Ita antiquissimi codd. Vat. Reg. collect. 1, alius Vat. collect. 3, Vindebon. duo collect. 5 et Hisp. cum editis ante Quesn., cohaeretque cum aliis similibus hujus epistolae locis. Quesnellus, vestram, ut alii codices hoc loco exhibent. Post pauca ineptissima pro incestissima in cod. Vercellenti collect. 8.

So the very ancient manuscripts Vatican Regina collection 1, another Vatican of collection 3, two Vienna [manuscripts] of collection 5, and the Hispana, with the editions before Quesnel; and it agrees with other similar passages of this letter. Quesnel, "vestram" ("your", plural), as other manuscripts show in this place. Shortly after, "ineptissima" ("most absurd") for "incestissima" in the Vercelli manuscript of collection 8.

(e) ‹vulgatum est.› · printed under col 689

Vat. Reg. collect. 1, utrique Hisp. et Vat. Isid., et qui per omnia sunt in impietate sensuum pares. Vindebon. collect. 5 omittit enim.

Vatican Regina collection 1, both Hispana manuscripts and the Vatican Isidorian, "et qui per omnia sunt in impietate sensuum pares" ("and those who in all things are equal in the impiety of their opinions"). The Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5 omits "enim".

(f) ‹dissimiles.› · printed under cols 689–690

Vat. Hisp. et Isid. cum tribus aliis mss., Discussis itaque.

The Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, with three other manuscripts, "Discussis itaque" ("Having thus examined").

Page

  • running head: 689 EPISTOLA XV. (across the page with col 690)
  • marginal letters: A ‹auctore damnatis.›; B ‹quanto immundiora sunt›; C ‹sensuum pares, non possunt›; D (in the footnotes) ‹Merlinus, isti abdicando›
  • old-edition numerals: 708 before ‹effugiant›
  • signature: none
  • other: none
PL 54:690
vel, ut mitius dixerim, non resistunt. QUA CONSCIENTIA honorem sibi praestitum vindicant, qui pro animabus sibi creditis non laborant? Bestiae irruunt, et ovium septa non claudunt. Fures insidiantur, et excubias non praetendunt. Morbi crebrescunt, et remedia nulla prospiciunt. Cum autem etiam illud addunt, ut his qui sollicitius agunt consentire detrectent, et impietates olim toto orbe damnatas, subscriptionibus suis se anathematizare dissimulent; quid de se intelligi volunt, nisi quod non de numero fratrum, sed de parte sunt hostium?
[…] or, to speak more mildly, do not resist them. WITH WHAT CONSCIENCE do they claim the honour bestowed on them, who do not labour for the souls entrusted to them? The beasts rush in, and they do not shut the sheepfolds. Thieves lie in wait, and they do not set watches. Diseases multiply, and they provide no remedies. And when they add this as well, that they refuse to agree with those who act more carefully, and evade anathematizing with their signatures impieties long since condemned throughout the whole world, what do they wish to be understood of themselves, except that they are not of the number of the brethren, but of the party of the enemies?
Cap. XVII. An caro Christi vere requieverit in sepulcro. — In eo vero quod in extrema familiaris epistolae tuae parte posuisti, miror cujusquam catholici intelligentiam laborare, tamquam incertum sit an descendente ad inferna Christo, caro ejus requieverit in sepulcro: quae sicut vere et mortua est et sepulta, ita vere est die tertio suscitata. Hoc enim et ipse Dominus denuntiaverat, dicens ad Judaeos: Solvite templum hoc, et in triduo suscitabo illud (Joan. II, 19). Ubi evangelista subjungit: Hoc autem dicebat de templo corporis sui (Ibid., 21).
Chap. XVII. Whether the flesh of Christ truly rested in the tomb. — As to what you set down in the last part of your friendly letter, I wonder that the understanding of any catholic should be in difficulty, as though it were uncertain whether, while Christ descended to the lower regions, His flesh rested in the tomb: which, as it truly both died and was buried, so it was truly raised on the third day. For this the Lord Himself too had announced, saying to the Jews: Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up (John 2:19). Where the evangelist adds: But He was speaking of the temple of His body (ibid. 21).
Cujus rei veritatem etiam David propheta praedixerat, loquens sub persona Domini Salvatoris, et dicens: Insuper et caro mea requiescet in spe. Quoniam non derelinques animam meam in inferno, nec dabis Sanctum tuum videre corruptionem (Psal. XV, 9, 10), Quibus utique verbis manifestum est, quod caro Domini et vere sepulta requievit, et corruptionem non subiit: quia celeriter vivificata reditu animae resurrexit. Quod non credere satis impium est, et ad Manichaei Priscillianique doctrinam pertinere non dubium est, qui sacrilego sensu ita se Christum simulant confiteri, ut incarnationis, et mortis, et resurrectionis auferant veritatem.
The truth of this matter the prophet David too had foretold, speaking in the person of the Lord the Saviour, and saying: Moreover my flesh also shall rest in hope. For Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, nor wilt Thou give Thy Holy One to see corruption (Ps. 15:9–10). By these words it is certainly plain that the Lord's flesh both truly rested when buried and did not undergo corruption: because, quickly brought to life by the return of the soul, it rose again. Not to believe this is impious enough, and it undoubtedly belongs to the doctrine of Mani and Priscillian, who with sacrilegious meaning so pretend to confess Christ as to take away the truth of the incarnation, and of the death, and of the resurrection.
Habeatur ergo inter vos episcopale concilium, et ad eum locum qui omnibus opportunus sit vicinarum provinciarum conveniant sacerdotes, ut, secundum haec quae ad tua consulta respondimus, plenissimo
Let an episcopal council therefore be held among you, and let the bishops of the neighbouring provinces assemble at the place which is convenient for all, so that, in accordance with what we have answered to your inquiries, by a most thorough […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 690

Footnotes

(f) continued from col 689, set in n689.

(g) ‹QUA CONSCIENTIA› · printed under col 690

Vindeb. Hisp., honorem sibi sacerdotii praestitum. Vat. Hisp., honorem sibi praesulum vindicant. Alias in vulgatis debitum pro praestitum.

The Vienna Hispana, "honorem sibi sacerdotii praestitum" ("the honour of the priesthood bestowed on them"). The Vatican Hispana, "honorem sibi praesulum vindicant" ("they claim for themselves the honour of prelates"). Elsewhere in the printed editions "debitum" ("due") for "praestitum".

(h) ‹septa non claudunt.› · printed under col 690

Vat. Hisp. et Isid., et in margine editionis Labbeanae, Ferae insidiantur.

The Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, and in the margin of Labbe's edition, "Ferae insidiantur" ("Wild beasts lie in wait").

(i) ‹remedia nulla prospiciunt. Cum› · printed under col 690

In iisdem codd. et in Vindeb. collect. 5 omittitur autem. Dein subscriptionibus suis delent codices Grim. et Thuan. tres Quesnelli. Mox se abest a codd. Vat. Reg., utrisque Hisp. Vat., Isid. et tribus aliis mss.

In the same manuscripts and in the Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5 "autem" is omitted. Then Quesnel's three manuscripts, the Grimani and the Thuanean, delete "subscriptionibus suis". Next, "se" is absent from the manuscripts Vatican Regina, both Hispana manuscripts, the Vatican, the Isidorian, and three other manuscripts.

(j) ‹de parte› · printed under col 690

Mss. Vindeb. collect. 5 et Vat. collect. 11, sint.

The Vienna manuscript of collection 5 and the Vatican of collection 11, "sint" (subjunctive).

(k) ‹In eo vero quod› · printed under col 690

Addidimus praepositionem in cum Vat. Reg. duobus Vindebonensibus, ac tribus aliis Vatt. Labbeus ex cod. Justelli: Jam vero quod in extrema.

We have added the preposition "in" with Vatican Regina, two Vienna manuscripts, and three other Vatican [manuscripts]. Labbe, from Justel's manuscript: "Jam vero quod in extrema" ("Now as to what in the last …").

(l) ‹caro mea› · printed under col 690

Cod. Vat. Reg., requiescit; et mox idem ms. una cum Vindebon. collect. 5, non derelinquis.

The Vatican Regina manuscript, "requiescit" ("rests"); and next the same manuscript, together with the Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5, "non derelinquis" ("Thou dost not leave").

(m) ‹manifestum est,› · printed under col 690

Idem Vindebon., quod caro Christi; Vat. Hisp. et Isid., quod caro Christi et in sepulcro requievit.

The same Vienna [manuscript], "quod caro Christi" ("that the flesh of Christ"); the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, "quod caro Christi et in sepulcro requievit" ("that the flesh of Christ both rested in the tomb").

(n) ‹resurrectionis auferant veritatem.› · printed under col 690

In Vat., Hisp. et Isid., alioque Vat. collect 11 nec non in ms. libro, quem Labbeus laudat, sic legitur: Habeantur ergo inter vos epistolae et ad concilium in eum locum, etc. Al., in unum locum. Vindeb. Hisp. praefert solum Habeantur; et hinc forte posteriores amanuenses ejusdem collectionis pro episcopale emendarunt epistolae, etc.

In the Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, and in another Vatican [manuscript] of collection 11, and also in the manuscript book which Labbe cites, it reads thus: "Habeantur ergo inter vos epistolae et ad concilium in eum locum", etc. ("Let letters therefore be held among you, and to a council at that place …"). Others, "in unum locum" ("at one place"). The Vienna Hispana presents only "Habeantur"; and hence perhaps later copyists of the same collection emended "episcopale" to "epistolae", etc.

Page

  • running head: …TOLA XV. 690 (across the page from col 689, "EPISTOLA")
  • marginal letters: A ‹vel, ut mitius dixerim›; B ‹verit in sepulcro›; C ‹scillianique doctrinam›; D (in the footnotes) ‹et Thuan. tres Quesnelli›
  • old-edition numerals: 709 after ‹animabus›; 710 after ‹incarnationis,›
  • signature: none
  • other: none
PL 54:691
simo disquiratur examine an sint aliqui inter episcopos qui hujus haereseos contagio polluantur; a communione sine dubio separandi, si nefandissimam sectam per omnium sensuum pravitates damnare noluerint. Nulla enim ratione tolerandum est ut qui praedicandae fidei suscepit officium, is contra Evangelium Christi, contra apostolicam doctrinam, contra universalis Ecclesiae Symbolum audeat disputare.
[…] examination it may be inquired whether there are any among the bishops who are polluted by the contagion of this heresy; they are without doubt to be separated from communion if they refuse to condemn the most abominable sect through [its] perversities of every opinion. For in no way is it to be tolerated that one who has undertaken the office of preaching the faith should dare to dispute against the Gospel of Christ, against the apostolic teaching, against the Creed of the universal Church.
Quales illic erunt discipuli, ubi tales docebunt magistri? QUAE ILLIC religio populi, quae salus plebis, ubi contra humanam societatem pudoris sanctitas tollitur, conjugiorum foedus aufertur, propagatio generationis inhibetur, carnis natura damnatur, contra verum autem veri Dei cultum Trinitas Deitatis negatur, personarum proprietas confunditur, anima hominis divina essentia praedicatur, et eadem ad diaboli arbitrium carne concluditur, Dei Filius per id quod ex Virgine ortus, non per id quod ex Patre natus est, unigenitus praedicatur, idemque nec vera Dei proles,
What sort of disciples will there be there, where such masters teach? WHAT RELIGION OF THE PEOPLE will there be there, what salvation of the common folk, where, against human society, the sanctity of modesty is taken away, the bond of marriages is removed, the propagation of offspring is prevented, the nature of the flesh is condemned, and, against the true worship of the true God, the Trinity of the Godhead is denied, the distinctness of the persons is confused, the soul of man is proclaimed to be of the divine essence, and the same is shut up in flesh at the will of the devil, the Son of God is proclaimed only-begotten by reason of His having arisen from the Virgin, not by reason of His having been born of the Father, and He, neither the true offspring of God, […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 691

Footnotes

(a) ‹humanam societatem› · printed under col 691

Ita Quesnellus cum septem suis codd. et cum editionibus Nicolini, ac Surii, quibus concinunt plerique nostri. Duo enim tantummodo excipiendi sunt: Vat. 5845, in quo habetur pudor sanctitatis sustollitur, et Vat. collect. 24 qui cum mss. Grimanico et vulgatis ante Quesn. praefert: pudoris justi verecundia tollitur, conjugiorum foedera auferuntur.

So Quesnel with seven of his manuscripts and with the editions of Nicolini and of Surius, with which most of ours agree. For only two are to be excepted: Vatican 5845, in which is found "pudor sanctitatis sustollitur" ("the modesty of sanctity is taken away"), and Vatican collection 24, which, with the Grimani manuscript and the editions before Quesnel, presents: "pudoris justi verecundia tollitur, conjugiorum foedera auferuntur" ("the reverence of just modesty is taken away, the bonds of marriages are removed").

(b) ‹carnis natura damnatur,› · printed under col 691

Vat., Hisp. et Isid., veri Dei cultus interdicitur, Trinitas Deitatis, etc. Tres codices, quos Quesnellus vidit, et duo nostri Vaticani, necnon alius apud Labbeum cum editis ad marginem: verus Dei cultus interdicitur, etc. Vindeb. Hisp., Contra verum Dei cultum, etc. Alius Vindeb. collect. 5. Trinitas Deitatis, negata personarum proprietate, confunditur.

The Vatican Hispana and the Isidorian, "veri Dei cultus interdicitur, Trinitas Deitatis", etc. ("the worship of the true God is forbidden, the Trinity of the Godhead …"). Three manuscripts which Quesnel saw, and two Vatican ones of ours, and also another in Labbe with the editions in the margin: "verus Dei cultus interdicitur", etc. ("the true worship of God is forbidden"). The Vienna Hispana, "Contra verum Dei cultum", etc. Another Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5: "Trinitas Deitatis, negata personarum proprietate, confunditur" ("the Trinity of the Godhead is confused, the distinctness of the persons being denied").

(c) ‹proprietas confunditur,› · printed under col 691

Idem Vindebon. collect. 5, duo Vatt., Hisp. et Isid., unus Vercell., cum tribus aliis nostris mss. et quatuor a Quesn. in margine indicatis, animabus humanis divina essentia datur.

The same Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5, two Vatican ones, the Hispana and the Isidorian, one Vercelli manuscript, with three other manuscripts of ours and four indicated by Quesnel in the margin, "animabus humanis divina essentia datur" ("a divine essence is given to human souls").

(d) ‹idemque› · printed under col 691

Duo codd. Vatt. collect. 21, nec veri Dei proles, nec verus filius Virginis asseritur.

Two Vatican manuscripts of collection 21, "nec veri Dei proles, nec verus filius Virginis asseritur" ("is asserted to be neither the offspring of the true God nor the true son of the Virgin").

(e), (f), (g) called in col 692, printed under col 691 ((g) continuing under col 692): set in n692.

Page

  • running head: 691 S. LEONIS MAGNI (across the page with col 692)
  • marginal letters: A ‹simo disquiratur examine›; B ‹bitrium carne concluditur›; C (in the footnotes) ‹Isid., unus Vercell.›; D (in the footnotes) ‹adBalconium Gallaeciae metropolitam›
  • old-edition numerals: none
  • signature: none
  • other: the text of col 691 fills only its upper third; the rest of the column is footnotes.
PL 54:692
nec verus Virginis partus asseritur, ut per falsam passionem mortemque non veram mendax etiam resurrectio resumptae de sepulcro carnis habeatur? Frustra autem utuntur catholico nomine, qui istis impietatibus non resistunt. POSSUNT haec credere, qui possunt talia patienter audire.
[…] nor the true offspring of the Virgin, is asserted, so that, through a false passion and a death not true, the resurrection too of the flesh taken up again from the tomb is held to be a lie? In vain, moreover, do they use the catholic name who do not resist these impieties. THEY CAN believe these things who can listen patiently to such things.
Dedimus itaque litteras ad fratres et coepiscopos nostros Tarraconenses, Carthaginenses, Lusitanos, atque Gallicos, eisque concilium synodi generalis indiximus. Ad tuae dilectionis sollicitudinem pertinebit, ut nostrae ordinationis auctoritas ad praedictarum provinciarum episcopos deferatur. Si autem aliquid quod absit, obstiterit, quo minus possit celebrari generale concilium, Galliciae saltem in unum conveniant sacerdotes, quibus congregandis fratres nostri Idatius et Ceponius imminebunt, conjuncta cum eis instantia tua, quo citius vel provinciali conventu remedium tantis vulneribus afferatur.
We have therefore given letters to our brothers and fellow bishops of Tarraconensis, Carthaginensis, Lusitania and Gallicia, and have proclaimed to them the assembling of a general synod. It will belong to the solicitude of your Charity that the authority of our ordinance be conveyed to the bishops of the aforesaid provinces. But if anything, which God forbid, should stand in the way of a general council's being able to be celebrated, let at least the bishops of Gallicia assemble in one place, over whose gathering our brothers Idatius and Ceponius will preside, your own urgency joined with theirs, so that a remedy may be brought the more quickly to such great wounds, even by a provincial assembly.
Data XII kal. Augustas Calepio et Ardabure vv. cc. coss.
Given on the twelfth day before the Kalends of August, in the consulship of the most illustrious men Calepius and Ardabur.
Editors' notes and page, col. 692

Footnotes

(e) ‹Lusitanos, atque› · printed under col 691

Gallaeciae episcopos hic intelligi patet ex his quae Quesnellus attulit not. 9. Gallicios vel Gallaecos ille mallet; sed Gallicos pro Gallicios in mss. passim invenitur, ut in epistola Siricii ad Himerium observavit Coustantius, not. c. pag. 738. Mirum omitti Baeticos, cum synodus adversus Priscillianistas jussu Leonis coacta, ex Tarraconensibus, Carthaginensibus, Lusitanis, atque Baeticis coaluerit, ut constat ex Regula fidei subjecta Toletano I, quae Leone praecipiente condita fuit. Quod si in hac synodo non memorantur Gallaeci, quos Leo cum caeteris convenire hoc loco praecepit, aliquid impedimenti obstitit quominus ad eam synodum cum aliis Hispanis concurrerent: unde cum abessent, Regula fidei ab ea synodo ad Balconium Gallaeciae metropolitam transmissa fuit. Aliam vero distinctam synodum paulo post a Gallaecis habitam observabimus annot. 83 (infer., (h)).

That the bishops of Gallaecia are meant here is clear from what Quesnel brought forward in note 9. He would prefer "Gallicios" or "Gallaecos"; but "Gallicos" for "Gallicios" is found here and there in the manuscripts, as Coustant observed in the letter of Siricius to Himerius, note c, page 738. It is strange that the Baetici are omitted, since the synod assembled against the Priscillianists by Leo's order was made up of the bishops of Tarraconensis, Carthaginensis, Lusitania and Baetica, as is established from the Rule of Faith appended to [the Council of] Toledo I, which was composed at Leo's bidding. And if the Gallaeci, whom Leo in this place ordered to assemble with the rest, are not mentioned in this synod, some hindrance stood in the way of their coming together to that synod with the other Spaniards: hence, since they were absent, the Rule of Faith was sent by that synod to Balconius, metropolitan of Gallaecia. But we shall observe in annotation 83 (below, (h)) another, distinct synod held a little later by the Gallaeci.

(f) ‹nostrae ordinationis› · printed under col 691

Pontificiae epistolae peculiari ratione auctoritates appellatae sunt, eo quod praecipuam ratione primatus in tota Ecclesia auctoritatem obtineant. Sic Zosimus, epist. 1, ad episcopos Galliae, num. 1, inquit: Quam auctoritatem ubique nos misisse manifestum est. Hinc in vetusto cod. Vat. Palat. 574, qui antiquam Gallicanam collectionem continet, Romanorum pontificum constitutiones sic inscribuntur: Auctoritas Innocentii papae, auctoritas Zosimi papae, etc. Confer epist. 19 Leonis, cap, 1.

Papal letters were called "authorities" for a particular reason, because by reason of the primacy they hold a pre-eminent authority in the whole Church. So Zosimus, letter 1, to the bishops of Gaul, no. 1, says: "Which authority it is manifest that we have sent everywhere." Hence in the old Vatican Palatine manuscript 574, which contains an ancient Gallican collection, the constitutions of the Roman pontiffs are headed thus: "Authority of Pope Innocent, authority of Pope Zosimus", etc. Compare Leo's letter 19, chapter 1.

(g) ‹Si autem› · printed under cols 691–692

Cod. Vindeb. Hisp., aliqui, quod absit, obstiterint. Intelligitur autem impedimentum aliquod sive a principibus diversis, sive ut verisimilius est, a bello et publica rerum Hispanicarum perturbatione, ex quibus inter sacerdotes Dei difficiles commeatus, et rari coeperunt esse conventus, ut tradit idem Leo in hujus epistolae praefatione.

The Vienna Hispana manuscript, "aliqui, quod absit, obstiterint" ("[if] any, which God forbid, should stand in the way"). Some hindrance is understood, either from differing rulers or, as is more likely, from the war and the public disturbance of Spanish affairs, on account of which journeys among the bishops of God became difficult and meetings rare, as the same Leo relates in the preface of this letter.

(h) ‹generale concilium,› · printed under col 692

Hoc quidem concilium coactum fuisse indicat Lucretius episcopus in synodo I Bracarensi inquiens: Beatissimus papa urbis Romae Leo..... per Turribium notarium sedis suae ad synodum Galliciae contra impiam Priscillianae haereseos sectam scripta sua direxit. Haec autem Leonis epistola ad Galliciae synodum, quae desideratur, post praesentem ad Turribium data fuit. Dum enim Leo epistolam ad Turribium scripsit, et per Pervincum Turribii notarium ex Idatio transmisit, nondum erat congregata peculiaris Galliciae synodus; immo nec erat congreganda, cum Gallaeci, nisi quid impedimenti opponeretur, una cum aliis Hispanicarum provinciarum episcopis ad generale concilium Leonis jussu convenire deberent. Cum vero iidem impediti fuissent a generali concilio, post acceptam fortassis Regulam fidei ab aliis Hispanis ad Balconium Galliciae metropolitanum directam, suae provinciae synodum habuere, ad quam S. Leo scripsit. In antiquissimo cod. 59 capituli Veronensis, qui continet pervetustum Breviarium canonum, et decretalium Romanorum pontificum, tum in praemissa tabula titulorum, num. 30, tum in opere num. 30, legitur: Ex epistola Leonis papae ad Balconium; nihil autem ex ipsa epistola praeter morem profertur. Num vero haec epistola data fuerit non solum ad Balconium, sed etiam ad caeteros episcopos synodi Galliciae, ita ut sit illa, quam Lucretius in synodo Bracarensi memoravit; an sit alia peculiaris ad Balconium, incertum est. Ad haeresim certe Priscillianistarum, quae in Gallicia vigebat, pertinuisse videtur.

That this council was indeed assembled is indicated by Bishop Lucretius at the First Synod of Braga, saying: "The most blessed pope of the city of Rome, Leo ..... sent his writings through Turribius, notary of his see, to the synod of Gallicia against the impious sect of the Priscillianist heresy." This letter of Leo to the synod of Gallicia, which is lost, was given after the present one to Turribius. For when Leo wrote the letter to Turribius, and sent it through Pervincus, Turribius's notary, [who came] from Idatius, the particular synod of Gallicia had not yet been assembled; indeed it was not to be assembled, since the Gallaeci, unless some hindrance stood in the way, were to come together by Leo's order to the general council along with the bishops of the other Spanish provinces. But when the same were hindered from the general council, perhaps after receiving the Rule of Faith sent by the other Spaniards to Balconius, metropolitan of Gallicia, they held a synod of their own province, to which St Leo wrote. In the very ancient manuscript 59 of the chapter of Verona, which contains a very old Breviary of the canons and decretals of the Roman pontiffs, both in the table of titles placed in front, no. 30, and in the work itself, no. 30, one reads: "From the letter of Pope Leo to Balconius"; but nothing from the letter itself is brought forward, contrary to custom. Whether this letter was given not only to Balconius but also to the other bishops of the synod of Gallicia, so that it is the one which Lucretius mentioned at the synod of Braga, or whether it is another, addressed particularly to Balconius, is uncertain. It certainly seems to have concerned the heresy of the Priscillianists, which was flourishing in Gallicia.

(i) ‹sacerdotes, quibus› · printed under col 692

Ita mss. codd. et Quesnelli et nostri. Al., congregatis. Vindeb. collect. 5 omittit utrumque scribens: quibus fratres nostri Aedacius. Vindeb. Hisp., Dacius.

So the manuscripts, both Quesnel's and ours. Others, "congregatis". The Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5 omits both, writing: "quibus fratres nostri Aedacius". The Vienna Hispana, "Dacius".

(j) ‹afferatur.› · printed under col 692

Chronicam notam Quesnellus adjecit ex mss. Corb. Barb. 1, Trecopith. Chifflet. et tribus Thuan., ac editione Surii. Eamdem confirmant plerique nostri codd. Calipio plerumque in hac epistola scribitur, cui affine est in vulgatis Valentiniani Novellis Callypio. At in Vat. Reg. collect. 1, et in Vindebon. collect. 5, habetur Calepio, uti hoc nomen similiter scribitur non solum in Fastis Latinis Prosperi, Idatii, Marcellini et Cassiodori, nec non in vetustioribus ac emendatioribus Novellarum exemplaribus Ottobon. et Wurceburg. a Riterio laudatis nov. 5 de Sepulcris et nov. 3 de Palatinis; verum etiam in inscriptione basilicae S. Pauli num. 201, et idcirco hanc lectionem suscepimus.

Quesnel added the chronological note from the manuscripts Corbie, Barberini 1, the Pithou manuscript of Troyes, the Chifflet manuscript and three Thuanean ones, and from the edition of Surius. Most of our manuscripts confirm it. "Calipio" is mostly written in this letter, with which "Callypio" in the printed Novels of Valentinian is akin. But in Vatican Regina collection 1 and in the Vienna [manuscript] of collection 5 "Calepio" is found, as this name is likewise written not only in the Latin Fasti of Prosper, Idatius, Marcellinus and Cassiodorus, and also in the older and more correct copies of the Novels, the Ottoboni and Würzburg ones cited by Ritter, Novel 5 "On Tombs" and Novel 3 "On the Palatini", but also in the inscription of the basilica of St Paul, no. 201; and therefore we have adopted this reading.

Page

  • running head: MAGNI EPISTOLAE. 692 (across the page from col 691, "S. LEONIS …")
  • marginal letters: A ‹les, nec verus Virginis›; B ‹cum eis instantia tua›; C (in the footnotes) ‹Hispanicarum provinciarum episcopis›; D (in the footnotes) ‹gregatis. Vindeb. collect. 5›
  • old-edition numerals: 711 after ‹Ad tuae›
  • signature: none
  • other: Letter XV ends in col 692 with its date line; the text fills only the upper third of the column, the rest is footnotes.
PL 54:693
S. TURRIBII ASTURICENSIS EPISTOLA.
THE LETTER OF ST TURRIBIUS OF ASTORGA.
De non recipiendis in auctoritatem fidei apocryphis scripturis, et de secta Priscillianistarum.
On not receiving apocryphal writings as an authority of faith, and on the sect of the Priscillianists.
Sanctis ac beatissimis, et omni veneratione colendis, IDACIO et CEPONIO episcopis, TURRIBIUS.
To the holy and most blessed bishops, worthy to be honoured with all veneration, Idacius and Ceponius, Turribius.
Cap. I. — Molesta semper est et injucunda peregrinatio, quam afficiunt [Al. efficiunt] duri labores, et lacrymabiles necessitatum curae. Habet tamen aliquid adjumenti [Al. instrumenti], cum adeundo incognita, vel ignorata discendo, quodam profectu mentis augemur; plerumque ea, quae apud nos optima videbantur, prava esse atque deterrima, reddita nobis meliorum ratione, noscentes. Quod mihi usu venit, qui diversas provincias adeundo, in omnibus Ecclesiis quae in unitatis communione consistunt, condemnatis omnibus errorum sectis, reperi unum atque eumdem catholicae fidei sensum teneri ex purissimo veritatis fonte venientem: qui in nulla divortia multifidis rivulis scissus camporum plana in coenosas voragines solvat, quae rectum fidei iter impediant. Eos vero, quos pravorum dogmatum virus infecerit, aut correctos piae parentis gremio reformari compellit, aut pertinaciter contumaces, veluti abortivos partus ac non legitimam sobolem ex consortio sanctae haereditatis expellit.
Chap. I. — Travel abroad is always troublesome and unpleasant, beset [Al. brought about] by hard labours and the tearful cares of necessities. Yet it has something of help [Al. of equipment] when, by visiting unknown places or learning what we did not know, we are enriched by a certain progress of mind; very often coming to know, when the reason of better things has been given us, that those things which seemed best among us are crooked and very bad. This has been my experience, who, in visiting various provinces, found in all the Churches which stand in the communion of unity, all the sects of error having been condemned, that one and the same sense of the catholic faith is held, coming from the purest fount of truth: which, split into no divergent channels by many-branched streams, does not dissolve the level plains into muddy pools such as would hinder the straight road of faith. And those whom the poison of perverse dogmas has infected it either compels, when corrected, to be restored in the bosom of their loving mother, or, if stubbornly obstinate, expels like abortive births and illegitimate offspring from the fellowship of the holy inheritance.
Cap. II. — Quapropter mihi post longas annorum metas ad patriam reverso, satis durum videtur, quod ex illis traditionibus, quas olim catholica damnavit Ecclesia, quasque jamdudum abolitas esse credebam, nihil penitus imminutum esse reperio. Immo etiam pro uniuscujusque studio et voluntate prava dogmata, velut quibusdam hydrinis capitibus pullulare cognosco: cum alii veteri errori blasphemiarum suarum augmenta contulerint, alii integrum eum usque adhuc retentent; alii vero, quos ex parte aliqua ad respectum sui contemplatio veritatis adduxit, ex illis sensibus retinendo nonnulla, reliquis vinculentur. Quod quidem per mala temporis nostri, synodorum conventibus decretisque cessantibus, liberius crevit; et impiissime, quod est cunctis deterius, ad unum altare diversis fidei sensibus convenitur.
Chap. II. — Therefore, now that I have returned to my native land after the long courses of years, it seems to me very hard that I find nothing at all diminished of those traditions which the catholic Church long ago condemned, and which I believed had long since been abolished. Nay rather, I recognize that perverse dogmas are sprouting, as if from so many hydra heads, according to the zeal and will of each: since some have added the increments of their own blasphemies to the old error, others retain it whole even until now; while others, whom the contemplation of the truth has in some part led to regard it, are bound by the remainder through retaining some things from those opinions. This indeed has grown the more freely through the evils of our time, as the assemblies and decrees of synods have ceased; and, most impiously, which is worse than all, men come together to one altar with differing opinions of the faith.
Cap. III. — Haec ergo ut loqui audeam, piae potius erga patriam charitatis quam temerariae praesumptionis esse confiteor. Nam alias plenus omnium peccatorum, et magnorum criminum reus, quo ausu haec ad vos scriberem, memor Dominicae vocis, quae dicit: In alieno oculo festucam vides, in tuo trabem non respicis (Matth. VII, 3)? Deinde conscius ejus sententiae, quae admonuit dicens: Peccatori dixit Deus: Quare praedicas justitias meas et assumis testamentum meum per os tuum (Ps. XLIX, 16)? Sed iterum illud aspicio, quod infra scriptum est: Furem videbas, et currebas sum eo, et cum adulteris portionem tuam ponebas (Ibid., 18). Neque enim illa sola sunt furta, quae alienorum direptione committuntur; vel sola illa adulteria, quae violatis maritalis tori affectibus perpetramus: sed et, subtractis quae vera sunt, furtum catholicae fidei perversi dogmatis facit assertio,
Chap. III. — That I dare to speak of these things, then, I confess to be the part of a loving charity towards my native land rather than of rash presumption. For otherwise, being full of all sins and guilty of great crimes, with what daring should I write these things to you, mindful of the Lord's voice, which says: You see the mote in another's eye, you do not regard the beam in your own (Matt. 7:3)? And then, conscious of that sentence which warned, saying: To the sinner God has said: Why do you declare My justices and take My covenant in your mouth (Ps. 49:16)? But again I look at what is written below: You saw a thief, and you ran with him, and you put your portion with adulterers (ibid. 18). For those are not the only thefts which are committed by plundering what belongs to others; nor are those the only adulteries which we perpetrate by violating the affections of the marriage bed: but the assertion of a perverse dogma also commits a theft of the catholic faith, by withdrawing the things that are true, […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 693

Page

  • running head: 693 S. TURRIBII ASTURICENSIS EPISTOLA. (across the page with col 694)
  • marginal letters: A ‹S. TURRIBII ASTURICENSIS EPISTOLA.› (at the head, in the gutter); B ‹demnatis omnibus errorum sectis›; C ‹etiam pro uniuscujusque›; D ‹ad vos scriberem›
  • old-edition numerals: 712 after ‹plerumque›; 713 after ‹usque adhuc›
  • signature: none
  • other: no footnotes on this page; the letter of Turribius begins at the head of col 693 with its caption, sub-caption and address printed in this column only.
PL 54:694
et adversus veritatem verbi Dei, malarum doctrinarum adulterio, zizaniae semina jaciuntur. Loquarne ergo, an taceam, nescio, quia utrumque formido. Sed ne forte sanctitas vestra, quae mala, quantaeque blasphemiae apocryphis libris, quos hi nostri vernaculi haeretici ad vicem sanctorum Evangeliorum legunt, continentur, ignoret, maximi facinoris reum me esse credo, si taceam. Itaque haec non adhortatio auctoritate alicujus est, sed potius suggestionis instructio.
[…] and, against the truth of the word of God, the seeds of tares are sown by the adultery of evil doctrines. Whether then I should speak or keep silent I do not know, because I fear both. But lest perhaps your Holiness should be ignorant what evils and how great blasphemies are contained in the apocryphal books, which these heretics of our own country read in place of the holy Gospels, I believe that I am guilty of a very great crime if I keep silent. And so this is not an exhortation resting on anyone's authority, but rather the information of a suggestion.
Cap. IV. — Primum ergo est ut illa patefaciam quae in plurimorum fide, vel magis perfidia, esse cognovi: quae cum a multis publico pene magisterio doceantur, si catholicorum aliquis paulo constantius, destructionis causa, assertioni resistat, continuo inficias eunt, et perfidiam perfidia occulunt. Quod ne ultra jam faciant, et apocryphis scripturis, quas canonicis libris, veluti secretas et arcanas, praeferunt, et quas maxima veneratione suscipiunt, et ex his quas legunt traditionis, dictisque auctorum suorum, ea quae in ipsis arguuntur vera esse docentes; aliqua autem ex his quae in istorum doctrina sunt, in illis quos legere potui apocryphis codicibus non tenentur. Quare unde prolata sint nescio, nisi forte ubi scriptum est per cavillationes illas, per quas loqui sanctos apostolos mentiuntur, aliquid interius indicatur, quod disputandum sit potius quam legendum, aut forsitan sint libri alii qui occultius secretiusque serventur, solis, ut ipsi aiunt, perfectis patentes.
Chap. IV. — The first thing, then, is that I should lay open those things which I have learned to be in the faith, or rather the faithlessness, of very many: which, although they are taught by many with an almost public magisterium, yet if any of the catholics resists the assertion a little more steadfastly, for the sake of overthrowing it, they at once deny it, and hide faithlessness by faithlessness. So that they may no longer do this, [I set them out,] both from the apocryphal writings, which they prefer to the canonical books as secret and hidden, and which they receive with the greatest veneration, and from those [writings] of tradition which they read, and from the sayings of their authors, as they teach that what is found fault with in these things is true; but some of the things which are in the doctrine of these men are not contained in those apocryphal books which I was able to read. Hence I do not know whence they were brought forth, unless perhaps, where it is written, something more inward is indicated through those quibbles in which they falsely claim that the holy apostles speak, something to be disputed rather than read; or perhaps there are other books which are kept more hiddenly and secretly, open, as they themselves say, only to the perfect.
Cap. V. — Illud autem specialiter in illis actibus qui S. Thomae dicuntur, prae caeteris notandum atque exsecrandum est, quod dicit eum non baptizare per aquam, sicut habet Dominica praedicatio, sed per oleum solum: quod quidem isti nostri non recipiunt [Forte lege. incipiunt], sed Manichaei sequuntur. Quae haeresis, quae eisdem libris utitur, et eadem dogmata, et his deteriora sectatur, ita exsecrabilis universis per omnes terras, ad primam professionis suae confessionem, nec discussa, damnetur oportet, per cujus auctores vel per maximum principem Manem ac discipulos ejus, libros omnes apocryphos vel compositos, vel infectos esse, manifestum est: specialiter autem Actus illos qui vocantur S. Andreae; vel illos qui appellantur S. Joannis, quos sacrilego Leucius ore concripsit; vel illos qui dicuntur S. Thomae, et his similia: ex quibus Manichaei et Priscillianistae, vel quaecumque illis est secta germana, omnem haeresim suam confirmare nituntur; maxime ex blasphemissimo illo libro, qui vocatur Memoria Apostolorum, in quo ad magnam perversitatis suae auctoritatem doctrinam Domini mentiuntur, qui totam destruit legem veteris Testamenti, et omnia quae S. Moysi de diversis creaturae factorisque divinitus revelata sunt; praeter reliquas ejusdem libri blasphemias, quas referre pertaesum est.
Chap. V. — But this in particular, in those Acts which are called [the Acts] of St Thomas, is to be noted and execrated above the rest, that it says he baptized not with water, as the Lord's preaching has it, but with oil alone: which indeed these men of ours do not receive [Perhaps read: begin], but the Manichaeans follow. This heresy, which uses the same books and follows the same dogmas and worse than these, is so execrable to all throughout all lands that it ought to be condemned at the first confession of its profession, without even being examined; by whose authors, or by its greatest chief Manes and his disciples, it is manifest that all the apocryphal books were either composed or infected: especially those Acts which are called [the Acts] of St Andrew; or those which are named [the Acts] of St John, which Leucius wrote with sacrilegious mouth; or those which are said to be of St Thomas, and things like these: from which the Manichaeans and Priscillianists, or whatever sect is kindred to them, strive to confirm their whole heresy; above all from that most blasphemous book which is called the Memoria Apostolorum, in which, to the great authority of their perversity, they falsely allege a teaching of the Lord which destroys the whole law of the Old Testament and all the things that were divinely revealed to St Moses concerning the diverse [works] of the creature and of the Maker; besides the other blasphemies of the same book, which it is wearisome to relate.
Cap. VI. — Ut autem mirabilia illa, atque virtutes, quae in apocryphis scripta sunt, sanctorum apostolorum vel esse, vel potuisse esse, non dubium est; ita disputationes, assertionesque illas sensuum malignorum
Chap. VI. — But just as it is not doubtful that those marvels and mighty works which are written in the apocrypha either are, or could have been, the holy apostles'; so those disputations and assertions of malignant opinions […]
Editors' notes and page, col. 694

Page

  • running head: S. TURRIBII ASTURICENSIS EPISTOLA. 694 (across the page from col 693)
  • marginal letters: A ‹et adversus veritatem›; B ‹ultra jam faciant›; C ‹exsecrandum est, quod›; D ‹lianistae, vel quaecumque›
  • old-edition numerals: 714 after ‹Dominica›
  • signature: none
  • other: the word hyphenated at the foot (ma-/lignorum) is completed from the head of col 695 and set whole here.