PL 54 · cols. 887–892
Leo the Great, Letters
Letters LXVIII–LXIX
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 887–892
Letters LXVIII–LXIX
(g) continued from col 886, set in n886
(a) ‹anchor: "innotescat: ut" (Letter LXVII)› · printed under col 887
Cod. Vallicell. addit charissime, et post praemuniant addit Frater.
The Vallicellian manuscript adds dearest, and after praemuniant ("fortify") adds Brother.
(b) ‹anchor: "Quae autem committenda" (Letter LXVII)› · printed under col 887, continuing under col 888
Cum pro Anatolii causa scripsisset imperator Theodosius, qui Eutychi patrocinabatur, quaedam in eumdem imperatorem sive querelae, sive praecautiones litteris committendae non fuere. Pseudosynodo enim Ephesinae, quo totam causam definitam Theodosius contendens epist. 64 aliud concilium recusabat, opponere volebat pontifex praeter synodum Romae habitam etiam Gallicanorum subscriptiones suae epistolae ad Flavianum, quae (etsi serius) transmissae fuerunt epist. 99. Quin ex cap. 4 hujus epistolae 99 colligitur, Leonis mentem fuisse ut ipsi Gallicani ad eumdem imperatorem scriberent; quod tamen mutatis paulo post rebus ob Theodosii mortem necessarium non fuisse ibidem tradunt. Ex his ergo quae fuerint mandata secreta Gallicanis legatis tradita satis perspicitur; simulque patet quam commentitia et falsa sit interpretatio hujus loci a Quesnello allata dissert. 5, part. II, cap. 9, in fine.
Since the emperor Theodosius, who was the patron of Eutyches, had written on behalf of Anatolius, certain things against that same emperor, whether complaints or precautions, were not to be committed to writing. For to the pseudo-synod of Ephesus, by which Theodosius, contending (Letter 64) that the whole case had been settled, refused another council, the pontiff wished to oppose, besides the synod held at Rome, also the subscriptions of the Gallicans to his letter to Flavian, which (though rather late) were sent (Letter 99). Indeed from chapter 4 of this Letter 99 it is gathered that it was Leo's intention that the Gallicans themselves should write to the same emperor; which, however, they state in the same place was not necessary, since matters changed shortly afterwards on account of the death of Theodosius. From these things, then, it is sufficiently seen what the secret instructions entrusted to the Gallican envoys were; and at the same time it is evident how fabricated and false is the interpretation of this passage brought forward by Quesnel in Dissertation 5, part II, chapter 9, at the end.
(c) ‹anchor: "EPISTOLA" (caption of Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 888
Alias post epist. 76. Quae autem erat 68, nunc 88. Aliquandiu post Maium an. 450.
Formerly after Letter 76. And the one that was 68 is now 88. Some time after May of the year 450.
(d) ‹anchor: "CERETII, SALONII" (heading of Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 888
Reperitur haec epistola in mss. collect. 5 et 12. Hanc autem epistolam praecedenti immediate subjicimus, eo quod ob defectum chronicae notae certum ejus tempus statuere non liceat, et aliunde post praecedentem Leonis epistolam scripta sit, acceptis scilicet a Ravennio litteris ad Flavianum, quas per Gallias disseminandas idem pontifex antecedenti epistola praeceperat. Cum vero sparsis per Ravennium pluribus earumdem litterarum exemplis Leonis doctrina in omnium Ecclesiarum conventiculis celebrari dicatur, in id sane a transmissis iisdem litteris non modicum tempus excurrere debuit; ac propterea haec epistola aliquot mensibus post diem 5 Maii, quo superiores litterae datae fuerunt, scripta dicenda est.
This letter is found in the manuscripts of collections 5 and 12. We place this letter immediately after the preceding one because, for lack of a date, its time cannot be fixed with certainty, and besides it was written after the preceding letter of Leo, namely after the letter to Flavian had been received from Ravennius, which the same pontiff had ordered in the preceding letter to be spread through the Gauls. But since, after many copies of that same letter had been distributed by Ravennius, Leo's doctrine is said to be celebrated in the assemblies of all the Churches, no small time must surely have elapsed for this after that letter was sent; and therefore this letter must be said to have been written some months after the 5th day of May, on which the foregoing letter was dated.
(e) ‹anchor: "SYNOPSIS" (editors' synopsis of Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 888
In tabula collect. 5, cap. 65, hic titulus legitur: Ceretii, Salonii et Verani, episcoporum Gallorum ad Leonem papam gratias super doctrinam agentium.
In the table of collection 5, chapter 65, this title is read: Of Ceretius, Salonius and Veranus, bishops of the Gauls, giving thanks to Pope Leo for his doctrine.
(f) ‹anchor: "beatissimo patri et" (address of Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 888
Ita ex Vindebonensi collect. 5. Vulgati apostolicae sedis. In eodem codice Verranus cum duplici rr scribitur. Qui autem fuerint Ceretius, Salonius et Veranus, Quesnellus in notis fuse perquirit.
So from the Vienna manuscript of collection 5. The printed editions: of the apostolic see. In the same manuscript Verranus is written with a double rr. Who Ceretius, Salonius and Veranus were, Quesnel investigates at length in his notes.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Pro accepta ejus ad Flavianum epistola gratias agunt, quam et per omnes Ecclesias asserunt celebrari. — II. Illius exemplar a se descriptum mittunt, a Leone corrigendum ac remittendum.
SYNOPSIS. — I. They give thanks for having received his letter to Flavian, which they declare is also celebrated throughout all the Churches. — II. They send a copy of it written out by themselves, to be corrected by Leo and sent back.
(b) continued from col 887, set in n887
(g) ‹anchor: "censuimus ut" (Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 888
Idem cod., tanta.
The same manuscript: tanta ("by so great").
(h) ‹anchor: "providae pietatis vocibus" (Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 888
Duo codd. collect, 12, Vat. 1340 et Venet. 169, alia interpunctione, praemoniti, agnoscimus, etc. Retinuimus vulgatam lectionem, quae est in cod. Vindebon. collect. 5, quaeque videtur respicere illa epistolae praecedentis, quibus Ravennio Leo suam epistolam 28 ad universos episcopos dirigendam praecepit, ut certiores effecti contra eos qui incarnationem Domini pravis persuasionibus aestimant temerandam, spirituali servitute praemuniant. Postea codices, transmiseris.
Two manuscripts of collection 12, Vatican 1340 and Venice 169, with a different punctuation: being forewarned, we recognize, etc. We have kept the common reading, which is in the Vienna manuscript of collection 5, and which seems to look back to those words of the preceding letter by which Leo ordered Ravennius to send his Letter 28 to all the bishops, so that, made more certain, they may fortify themselves by spiritual service against those who by depraved persuasions think that the incarnation of the Lord may be violated. Further on, the manuscripts: transmiseris ("you have sent").
(i) ‹anchor: "apostolica" (Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 888
Mss. collect. 12 delent illa.
The manuscripts of collection 12 delete illa ("that").
(a) ‹anchor: "et si quid" (Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 889
Ex epistola scilicet ad Flavianum, quam Leo ad Ravennium miserat per Gallias disseminandum, plura exempla transumpta fuere, et in exemplo quod ad Ceretium, Salonium atque Veranum missum fuerat, si quid librarii errore defuerit, emendandum efflagitant. Leonem quidem hoc exemplar emendasse quam accuratissime ex eo patet quod episcopos provinciae Mediolanensis idem pontifex monuit ut ejusdem epistolae exemplar a Ceretio procurarent. Vide epist. 97, c. 2.
From the letter to Flavian, that is, which Leo had sent to Ravennius to be spread throughout the Gauls, many copies were taken, and in the copy which had been sent to Ceretius, Salonius and Veranus they ask that if anything is lacking through a copyist's error it be corrected. That Leo corrected this copy as carefully as possible is plain from the fact that the same pontiff advised the bishops of the province of Milan to obtain a copy of that letter from Ceretius. See Letter 97, chapter 2.
(b) ‹anchor: "In rem missos" (Letter LXVIII)› · printed under col 889
Codices collect. 12, Ire missos... ac redire mox cupimus. Quesnellus cum codd. collect. 5, In re missos. Anteriorum editorum lectionem praetulimus.
The manuscripts of collection 12: We wish those sent to go ... and to return soon. Quesnel, with the manuscripts of collection 5: In re missos ("those sent in the matter"). We have preferred the reading of the earlier editors.
(c) ‹anchor: "EPISTOLA" (caption of Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 889
Al. 52. Quae autem antea 69 erat, nunc 89. Scripta 16 Julii an. 450.
Otherwise 52. And the one that was formerly 69 is now 89. Written on 16 July in the year 450.
(d) ‹anchor: "AD THEODOSIUM AUGUSTUM" (heading of Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 889
Exstat haec epistola in mss. collect. Hisp. Isid. 11, 12, 18, 19 et 21, usque ad 24, ac in exemplo Sichardi.
This letter is found in the manuscripts of the collections: Spanish, Isidorian, 11, 12, 18, 19 and 21, up to 24, and in Sichard's copy.
(e) ‹anchor: "SYNOPSIS" (editors' synopsis of Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 889
In collect. Hisp. hic titulus legitur: Item Leonis papae ad Theodosium Augustum, ubi scribit ut id quod de incarnatione Filii Dei ab Anatolio Constantinopolitano episcopo praedicatur agnoscat, et universale concilium in Italia fiat.
In the Spanish collection this title is read: Likewise of Pope Leo to Theodosius Augustus, where he writes that he should ascertain what is preached by Anatolius, bishop of Constantinople, concerning the incarnation of the Son of God, and that a universal council should be held in Italy.
(f) ‹anchor: "THEODOSIO" (address of Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 889
Vox semper deest in ms. Vindebon. Hisp. In aliis nonnullis omittitur etiam Augusto.
The word semper ("ever") is missing in the Vienna manuscript of the Spanish collection. In some others Augusto is omitted as well.
(g) ‹anchor: "CAP. I. —" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 889, continuing under col 890
Mss. collect. 21, Per omnes quidem vestrae pietatis epistolas. Plures autem Theodosii epistolae pro Nicaenae synodi custodia in Occidentem directae, quae hic indicantur, sunt duae ad Leonem, altera paulo post Ephesinum latrocinium scripta, cui Leo respondit epist. 54, altera cum de ordinatione Anatolii ad eumdem pontificem scripsit, cui is nunc responsum dat: nec non imperialis epist. 63, ad Placidiam Augustam. Cur autem imperator, qui Eutychi favebat, Nicaenam synodum inculcarit, explicavimus not. 6 (Col. 855, n g) in epist. 54.
The manuscripts of collection 21: Through all the letters of your Piety. The several letters of Theodosius sent to the West for the safeguarding of the Nicene synod, which are indicated here, are two to Leo, one written shortly after the Robber Synod of Ephesus, to which Leo replied in Letter 54, the other when he wrote to the same pontiff about the ordination of Anatolius, to which he now gives answer; and also the imperial Letter 63, to Placidia Augusta. Why the emperor, who favoured Eutyches, pressed the Nicene synod, we have explained in note 6 (col. 855, note g) on Letter 54.
(h) ‹anchor: "in alterutram" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 890
Editi Leonis addunt tibi. Quesnellus recepit hanc vocem, sed delevit temere, ac praeterea pro rescribendum posuit scribendum. Mss. collect. 21 delent tibi et temere. Vat. Hisp. et Isid. solum omittunt temere, at habent rescribendum. Vindebon. Hisp. ignorat tibi, et errore librarii, terre scribendum. Praetulimus lectionem codicis Ratisp., cui concinunt cod. Grim. mss. collect. 24 et exemplar Sichardi, nec non editiones Conciliorum. In epistola sequenti solum dicitur de Anatolio: Scribere ei interim distuli, non dilectionem negans, sed manifestationem catholicae veritatis exspectans.
The editions of Leo add tibi ("to you"). Quesnel accepted this word, but deleted temere ("rashly"), and besides put scribendum ("to be written") for rescribendum ("to be written back"). The manuscripts of collection 21 delete tibi and temere. The Vatican manuscript of the Spanish and Isidorian collections omits only temere, but has rescribendum. The Vienna manuscript of the Spanish collection does not know tibi, and by a copyist's error has terre scribendum. We have preferred the reading of the Regensburg manuscript, with which agree the Grimani manuscript, the manuscripts of collection 24 and Sichard's copy, and also the editions of the Councils. In the following letter it is said of Anatolius only: I have meanwhile put off writing to him, not denying him affection, but awaiting a manifestation of the catholic truth.
(i) ‹anchor: "ipsius" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 890
Addidimus et ex optimo cod. Ratisp.
We have added et ("both") from the excellent Regensburg manuscript.
(j) ‹anchor: "arduum videatur aut" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 890
Vulgati Leonis ante Quesn., ambiguum.
The printed editions of Leo before Quesnel: ambiguum ("ambiguous").
(k) ‹anchor: "ad quorum" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 890
Codex Ratisp., sententiam. Instructio vero quae ex scriptis Graecorum et Latinorum Patrum collecta par et multiplex traditur, comprehendit tum illam collectionem contra Nestorii impietatem sanctae memoriae Cyrillo insertam Ephesinae synodi gestis, quae indicatur paulo post; tum praesertim auctoritates ab ipso Leone collectas, et per legatos ad imperatorem transmissas, de quibus loquitur cap. 2. Vide annot. 19 (Col. 891, n k).
The Regensburg manuscript: sententiam ("judgement"). The instruction, collected from the writings of the Greek and Latin Fathers, which is said to be like and manifold, comprises both that collection against the impiety of Nestorius, inserted by Cyril of holy memory in the acts of the synod of Ephesus, which is indicated a little later, and especially the authorities collected by Leo himself and sent to the emperor by the legates, of which chapter 2 speaks. See note 19 (col. 891, note k).
SYNOPSIS. — I. Consensum suum ad ordinationem Anatolii CP. suspendit; professionem fidei exigit. — II. Petit ut idem haereticorum communionem abdicet, communi fidei subscribat. Legatos mittit. Synodum postulat intra Italiam fieri,
SYNOPSIS. — I. He suspends his consent to the ordination of Anatolius of Constantinople; he demands a profession of faith. — II. He asks that the same man renounce the communion of heretics and subscribe to the common faith. He sends legates. He asks that a synod be held within Italy.
(a) ‹anchor: "qui nunc" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Vulgati Leonis ante Quesn. male repullulat, abscindet errorem. Editi Concil. habent pariter male, sed abscidit. Nostri codices cum Sichardo et Quesnello, ut in textu.
The printed editions of Leo before Quesnel: which is wickedly sprouting again, it will cut off the error. The editions of the Councils likewise have male ("wickedly"), but abscidit ("it has cut off"). Our manuscripts, with Sichard and Quesnel, as in the text.
(b) ‹anchor: "Alexandrini episcopi" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Indicatur epistola secunda Cyrilli ad Nestorium. Confer annot. 5 (Col. 886, n. g) in epist. 67.
The second letter of Cyril to Nestorius is meant. Compare note 5 (col. 886, note g) on Letter 67.
(c) ‹anchor: "ab eo missam" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Memoratam Cyrilli epistolam ad S. Coelestinum transmissam fuisse liquet ex epistola 8, apud Coustantium pag., 1091. Probata ab eodem pontifice cognoscitur ex epist. 11, pag. 1102. Hinc eam apostolicae sedis scrinia susceperunt.
That the said letter of Cyril was sent to St Celestine is clear from Letter 8, in Coustant, p. 1091. That it was approved by the same pontiff is known from Letter 11, p. 1102. Hence the archives of the apostolic see received it.
(d) ‹anchor: "ita ut sinceram" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Editi ante Quesn. et Sichardus perperam, communionis fidei. Post pauca, et apostolicae sedi, in Vat. Hisp. et Isid.
The editions before Quesnel, and Sichard, wrongly: of the faith of communion. A little after, and to the apostolic see, in the Vatican manuscript of the Spanish and Isidorian collections.
(e) ‹anchor: "mundo," (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Ratisp., possint.
The Regensburg manuscript: possint ("they may").
(f) ‹anchor: "qualia" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Vat. Hisp. atque Isid., debentur.
The Vatican manuscript of the Spanish and Isidorian collections: debentur ("are due").
(g) ‹anchor: "scilicet atque" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Sic melius cum anterioribus editis codd. Vindebon. Hisp. Ratisp., mss. collect. 24 et exemplar Sichardi. Quesnellus et Merlinus, lucide; Vat. Hisp. et Isid. lucide protestantis.
So, better, with the earlier editions, the manuscripts Vienna (Spanish collection) and Regensburg, the manuscripts of collection 24 and Sichard's copy. Quesnel and Merlin: lucide ("lucidly"); the Vatican manuscript of the Spanish and Isidorian collections: lucide protestantis ("of one lucidly testifying").
(h) ‹anchor: "secernat," (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Vat. Hisp. et Isid., ut ejus fraternam in Christo charitatem merito possimus intendere. Infinitum intendere est etiam in Vindebon. Hisp.
The Vatican manuscript of the Spanish and Isidorian collections: so that we may deservedly direct towards his brotherly charity in Christ. The infinitive intendere is also in the Vienna manuscript of the Spanish collection.
(i) ‹anchor: "salubribus" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Mss. collect. 21, dispositionibus.
The manuscripts of collection 21: dispositionibus ("arrangements").
(j) ‹anchor: "et coepiscopos" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891
Excusi ante Quesn., nostros. Mox in Vat. Hisp., Sabundium; in Isid., Sabuldium pro Abundium; male, ut ex aliis epistolis liquet. Cod. Grim. pro Asterium habet Etherium tum hic tum in duabus sequentibus epistolis. Ratisp. hic Eterium praefert, in sequenti autem epistola Aterium.
The editions printed before Quesnel: nostros ("our"). Next, in the Vatican manuscript of the Spanish collection, Sabundium; in the Isidorian, Sabuldium, for Abundium; wrongly, as is clear from other letters. The Grimani manuscript has Etherium for Asterium, both here and in the two following letters. The Regensburg manuscript here offers Eterium, but in the following letter Aterium.
(k) ‹anchor: "per quos," (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 891, continuing under col 892
Cod. Grim., quae nostra fides. Quod porro additur, manifestatis instructionibus, quas misimus, complectebatur sane sufficientem paternarum auctoritatum instructionem, quae ad Theodosium directa traditur epist. 71. Vide ibidem annot. 9 (Col. 896, n. k).
The Grimani manuscript: what our faith [is]. What is further added, from the instructions which we have sent, when they are set out, certainly comprised the sufficient instruction from the authorities of the Fathers which is said in Letter 71 to have been sent to Theodosius. See note 9 there (col. 896, note k).
(l) ‹anchor: "ambiguum," (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Editiones ante Quesn. cum plerisque mss. etiam Vindebon. Hisp. et exemplo Sichardi, ut de superfluis. Quesnelli lectionem codex Ratisp. confirmat.
The editions before Quesnel, with most manuscripts, the Vienna manuscript of the Spanish collection too, and Sichard's copy: ut de superfluis ("so that about needless"). The Regensburg manuscript confirms Quesnel's reading.
(m) ‹anchor: "sicut" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Id factum fuerat epist. 44 Leonis et Romanae synodi nomine data die 13 Octobris anni praecedentis.
This had been done in Letter 44, given in the name of Leo and of the Roman synod on 13 October of the preceding year.
(n) ‹anchor: "convenientibus" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Vindebon. Hisp. delet omnibus.
The Vienna manuscript of the Spanish collection deletes omnibus ("all").
(o) ‹anchor: "ignorantia aut" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Ratisp. cum Vat. Hisp. ac Isid., errore, ubi forte omissa fuit initio littera t ob concursum ejusdem litterae in fine vocis praecedentis. Error ad ignorantiam anteriori voce expressam refertur. Hic autem indicatur vis in Ephesino latrocinio illata, cui nonnulli terrore perculsi cesserunt. Vide epist. 44, cap. 1. Hinc retinuimus cum editis Leoninis vocem terrore, cui affinis est vox timore, quae in editionibus Concil. post Merlinum, ac in exemplari Sichardi legitur. Post pauca ne cuiquam in Vat. collect. 11.
The Regensburg manuscript, with the Vatican manuscript of the Spanish and Isidorian collections: errore ("through error"), where perhaps the letter t was omitted at the beginning because the same letter meets it at the end of the preceding word. But error is related to the ignorance expressed by the previous word. Here, however, the violence inflicted at the Robber Synod of Ephesus is meant, to which some yielded, struck with terror. See Letter 44, chapter 1. Hence we have kept, with the editions of Leo, the word terrore, to which the word timore ("through fear") is akin, which is read in the editions of the Councils after Merlin and in Sichard's copy. A little after, ne cuiquam ("lest to anyone") in the Vatican manuscript of collection 11.
(p) ‹anchor: "ultra sit liberum ita" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Vide annot. 6 (Col. 855, n g) in epist. 54.
See note 6 (col. 855, note g) on Letter 54.
(q) ‹anchor: "et vestro" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Vat. Hisp. atque Isid. et mss. collect. 24 delent. hoc.
The Vatican manuscript of the Spanish and Isidorian collections and the manuscripts of collection 24 delete hoc ("this").
(r) ‹anchor: "una fides" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Conjunctionem et omittunt Vindebon. Hisp. Vat. collect. 11 et Ratisp., qui paulo post habet, una totius mundi confessio teneatur.
The Vienna manuscript of the Spanish collection, the Vatican manuscript of collection 11 and the Regensburg manuscript omit the conjunction et ("and"); the last has a little after una totius mundi confessio teneatur ("be held as the one confession of the whole world").
(s) ‹anchor: "Data" (Letter LXIX)› · printed under col 892
Hanc diem, quae est in antiquioribus editis, et apud Sichardum, nec non in Vat. Hisp. et in miss. collect. 21, 23 et 24, ac praecipue in codice Ratisp. revocandam putavimus. Quesnellus praetulit XVI kal. Augusti, quam chronicam notam in ms. Vindebon. Hisp. Vat. Isid., alio Vat. collect. 11 et in Merlini exemplo collect. 12 reperimus.
We thought this day should be restored, which is in the older editions and in Sichard, and also in the Vatican manuscript of the Spanish collection and in the manuscripts of collections 21, 23 and 24, and especially in the Regensburg manuscript. Quesnel preferred the sixteenth day before the Kalends of August, a date which we find in the Vienna manuscript of the Spanish collection, the Vatican manuscript of the Isidorian, another Vatican manuscript of collection 11, and in Merlin's copy of collection 12.