PL 54 · cols. 898–902
Leo the Great, Letters
Letters LXXII–LXXV
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 898–902
Letters LXXII–LXXV
(e) continued from col 897, set in n897
1 ‹anchor: "δεδοκιμασμένον σε" (Greek of Letter LXXII)› · printed under col 898 In ms. Ven., τῆς ὑγιοῦς πίστεως. Fortasse rectius.
In the Venice manuscript: τῆς ὑγιοῦς πίστεως ("of the sound faith"). Perhaps more correctly.
2 ‹anchor: "πρὸς τοὺς" (Greek of Letter LXXII)› · printed under col 898 In marg. edit. Rom., ἴσως. ταῦτα.
In the margin of the Roman edition: perhaps ταῦτα ("these things").
(a) ‹anchor: "EPISTOLA" (heading of Letter LXXIII)› · printed under col 899
Alias post ep. 57. Quae autem erat 73, nunc 90. Scripta exeunte Aug. aut initio Septemb. an. 450.
Formerly after letter 57. The one that was 73 is now 90. Written at the end of August or the beginning of September, in the year 450.
(b) ‹anchor: before "VALENTINIANI ET MARCIANI" (title of Letter LXXIII)› · printed under col 899
Haec Marciani imperatoris epistola invenitur in sola collectione Chalcedonensi et in ms. Veneto collect. 22, cui additiones ex Chalcedon. collectione accesserunt. Graecum textum originalem esse non dubitamus ex loci et consulatus notatione, quae in interpretatione Graeca omissa fuisset, ut in aliis epistolis Graece redditis constanter observatur. Num vero Latinus quoque textus sit originalis, an versio ex Graeco, inquiri potest. Certum est imperatorem Marcianum quaedam scripsisse Latine et Graece, uti Latine et Graece in ipsa Chalcedonensi synodo allocutus traditur actione 6, pag. 1472. Vide not. o Baluzii. Sic etiam Latine et Graece scriptam videbimus aliam ejusdem imperatoris epistolam 100 ad Leonem. Plura ejusdem generis proferre possemus exempla, si opus esset. Gravitas quidem et dignitas Latinae locutionis praesentis epistolae non interpretem e Graeco in aliis epistolis reddendis valde humilem et minus peritum, sed Latinum auctorem praefert.
This letter of the emperor Marcian is found only in the Chalcedonian collection and in the Venice manuscript of collection 22, to which additions from the Chalcedonian collection were joined. We do not doubt that the Greek text is the original, from the notation of the place and the consulship, which would have been omitted in a Greek translation, as is constantly observed in other letters rendered into Greek. Whether the Latin text too is original, or a version from the Greek, may be asked. It is certain that the emperor Marcian wrote certain things in Latin and in Greek, as he is reported to have addressed the Chalcedonian synod itself in Latin and in Greek, in the 6th session, p. 1472. See Baluze's note o. So too we shall see another letter of the same emperor to Leo, the 100th, written in Latin and in Greek. We could bring forward more examples of the same kind, if there were need. Indeed the gravity and dignity of the Latin diction of the present letter shows not the translator from the Greek, very lowly and less skilled, [seen] in the rendering of other letters, but a Latin author.
(c) ‹anchor: "VALENTINIANI ET MARCIANI" (title of Letter LXXIII)› · printed under col 899
Ita codd. Latini et Graecus textus, nec non in edit. Concil. Solus Quesnellus, ad episcopum.
So the Latin manuscripts and the Greek text, and also in the edition of the Councils. Quesnel alone has to the bishop.
(d) ‹anchor: "LEONI reverendissimo" (Latin version)› · printed under col 899
Idem Quesnellus cum Graeco: Episcopo. Lectionem vulgatam Conciliorum ex Latinis codicibus revocavimus.
Quesnel likewise, with the Greek: bishop. We have restored the common reading of the Councils from the Latin manuscripts.
(e) ‹anchor: "Ad hoc maximum imperium" (Latin version)› · printed under col 899
Cod. Divionensis, nos venire contigit. Alii Baluzii codices, veni.
The Dijon manuscript: it befell us to come. Other manuscripts of Baluze: I came.
(f) ‹anchor: "militiae. Unde" (Latin version)› · printed under col 899
Ms. Ver. 57, pro reverentia.
The Verona manuscript 57: for the reverence.
(g) ‹anchor: "Actum Constantinopoli," (Latin version)› · printed under cols 899–900
Ita optime ex eodem ms. Veron., cui caeteri nostri codd. accedunt, et solum tres Baluzii pro Avieni v. c. perperam habent Avieneni, Albieni, vel Avenieni VI. Dies et mensis in codd. et in Graeco desunt. Cum vero Marcianus hac in epistola suae assumptionis notitiam praebeat, ea paulo post electionem ejus scripta fuit. Nonnulli cum Baronio crediderunt Marcianum imperium suscepisse ante mensem Augustum hujus an. 450, eo quod in Cod. Justinianeo lex ejusdem imperatoris contra Eutychianos lata tradatur kal. Aug. Valentiniano VII et Avieno coss. Sed hanc chronicam notam perperam a Treboniano assutam fuisse huic legi ult. de Apostatis patet ex collectionibus Chalcedonensi, Hispanica. etc., in quibus eadem lex integra describitur cum data XV kal. Aug. CP. Sporatio v. c. et qui fuerit nuntiatus coss., id est 18 Julii an. 452. Porro Marcianum ad imperium ascendisse die 24 Augusti an. 450 ex Chronico Paschali colligitur. Igitur haec epistola scripta fuit hoc anno aut Augusto exeunte, aut ineunte Septembri.
So, and best, from the same Verona manuscript, which our other manuscripts join; only three of Baluze's wrongly have, for Avieni v. c., Avieneni, Albieni or Avenieni VI. The day and the month are missing in the manuscripts and in the Greek. But since Marcian gives notice of his accession in this letter, it was written shortly after his election. Some, with Baronius, have believed that Marcian took up the empire before the month of August of this year 450, because in the Justinian Code a law of the same emperor against the Eutychians is reported as issued on the kalends of August, Valentinian for the 7th time and Avienus being consuls. But that this chronological note was wrongly sewn on to this last law de Apostatis by Trebonianus is clear from the collections, the Chalcedonian, the Spanish, etc., in which the same law is copied entire with the date: 15th day before the kalends of August, at Constantinople, Sporatius v. c. and whoever shall have been announced being consuls, that is, 18 July of the year 452. Further, it is gathered from the Paschal Chronicle that Marcian ascended to the empire on 24 August of the year 450. Therefore this letter was written in this year, either at the end of August or at the beginning of September.
(h) ‹anchor: "EPISTOLA" (heading of Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 900 (mark printed "h", without parentheses)
Alias 55. Quae autem antea 74 erat, nunc 94. Scripta 13 Septemb. an. 450.
Formerly 55. The one that was formerly 74 is now 94. Written on 13 September, in the year 450.
(i) ‹anchor: before "AD MARTINUM PRESBYTERUM" (title of Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 900 (mark printed "i", without parentheses)
Est in ms. Grim. collect. 18 et in nostris codd. Vat. ac Veneto collect. 12, qui postremi perperam Martiano hanc epistolam inscribunt. Notat in postilla marginali Quesnellus: « Non uni Martino inscriptam fuisse a Leone hanc epistolam, sed caeteris pariter ejus collegis, patet ex epistolae contextu. » Sed ad solum Martinum initio scribens, ut indicant verba dilectionem tuam mox ad catholicam fraternitatem, id est ad omnes Constantinopolitanos, et praesertim monachos catholice sentientes sermonem dirigit.
It is in the Grimani manuscript of collection 18 and in our Vatican and Venice manuscripts of collection 12, the latter of which wrongly address this letter to Martian. Quesnel notes in a marginal gloss: "That this letter was addressed by Leo not to Martin alone, but equally to the rest of his colleagues, is clear from the context of the letter." But while writing at the beginning to Martin alone, as the words your Love indicate, he presently directs his speech to the catholic brotherhood, that is, to all the people of Constantinople, and especially to the monks of catholic mind.
(j) ‹anchor: "piae exsultationis" (Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 900 (mark printed "j", without parentheses)
Ita ex duobus nostris codicibus collect. 12, ipso exigente contextu, non ut in vulgatis, accepimus.
So from two of our manuscripts of collection 12, the context itself requiring it; not, as in the printed editions, accepimus [we have received].
SYNOPSIS. — Quam bonum sit pro veritate pati, cujus unitatem locorum spatia non scindunt. De legatis mentio.
SYNOPSIS. — How good it is to suffer for the truth, whose unity the distances of places do not divide. Mention of the legates.
Victores VALENTINIANUS et MARCIANUS gloriosi triumphatores, semper Augusti, LEONI reverendissimo archiepiscopo gloriosae civitatis Romae. Ad hoc maximum imperium venimus Dei providentia et electione senatus excellentissimi cunctaeque militiae. Unde pro reverenda et catholica religione fidei Christianorum, cujus auxiliis virtutum nostrae potentiae confidimus gubernari, tuam sanctitatem principatum in Episcopatú, divinae fidei possidentem, sacris litteris in principio justum credimus alloquendam: invitantes atque rogantes ut pro firmitate et statu nostri imperii aeternam Divinitatem tua sanctitas deprecetur, ut et tale propositum atque desiderium habeamus, quatenus omni impio errore sublato per celebrandam synodum, te auctore, maxima pax circa omnes episcopos fidei catholicae fiat, ab omni scelere pura et intemerata consistens. Actum Constantinopoli, consulatu VII domni Valentiniani Augusti PP., et Avieni. v. c.
(1) ‹anchor: "τὸ μέγιστον βασίλειον" (Greek text)› · printed under col 900 (the numeral is not visible in our scan)
Ms. Ven., ἦλθον.
The Venice manuscript: ἦλθον [I came].
(2) ‹anchor: "τήν τε σὴν" (Greek text)› · printed under col 900 (the numeral is not visible in our scan)
Sic ex codd. Graec. Vat. 1178 et Ottob. 29, pro ἀγνωσύνην, lectione vulgata.
So from the Greek manuscripts Vatican 1178 and Ottoboni 29, in place of ἀγνωσύνην, the common reading.
(3) ‹anchor: "ἡ σὴ" (Greek text)› · printed under col 900
Ms. Ten., ἱκετεύος.
Manuscript Ten.: ἱκετεύος.
(4) ‹anchor: "διὰ τῆς" (Greek text)› · printed under col 900
In marg. edit. Cotel., συγκοτηθησομένης συνόδου.
In the margin of Cotelier's edition: συγκοτηθησομένης συνόδου [the synod that is to be convened].
(g) continued from col 899, set in n899. Notes (h), (i), (j), printed under this column, answer calls in col 899 and are set in n899.
(a) ‹anchor: "Vobis enim" (Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 901
Sic mss. et Quesnellus. Caeterae editiones, datum est.
So the manuscripts and Quesnel. The other editions: it has been given.
(b) ‹anchor: "ut pro illo" (Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 901
Haec scripta sunt a Leone, dum nondum Theodosii, qui Eutychianis favebat, mortem acceperat; unde catholicos adhuc vexatos praesumit.
These things were written by Leo while he had not yet received [news of] the death of Theodosius, who favoured the Eutychians; hence he presumes that the catholics are still being harassed.
(c) ‹anchor: "atque consilium" (Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 901
Codd. collect. 12 cum editis Quesnello anterioribus ignorant pio. Iste in margine pro operi alias opere.
The manuscripts of collection 12, with the editions earlier than Quesnel, do not know pious. He, in the margin, for operi [work] has another reading, opere.
(d) ‹anchor: "supradictos sufficientes" (Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 901
Id est epistolam 71.
That is, letter 71.
(e) ‹anchor: "amplius quam" (Letter LXXIV)› · printed under col 901
Ita nostri codd. cum editis ante Quesn., apud quem, praevidemus.
So our manuscripts, with the editions before Quesnel; in his: we foresee.
(f) ‹anchor: "Data" (date of Letter LXXIV)› · printed under cols 901–902
Haec dies, mensis, et consulum notatio deest in ms. Grim. Legitur autem in nostris mss. et in editis. Solum post vocem Valentiniano supplendum esset Aug. VII. Utrique codices collect. 12 statim post consularem notam addunt, per Carterium et Asclepiadem diaconos Constantinopolitanum; corrupte. Cum enim epistola 80, cap. 1, mentio fiat Casterii, alias Carterii presbyteri, et Asclepiadis diaconi Constantinopolitani, legendum credimus per Carterium, seu Casterium presbyterum, et Asclepiadem diaconum Constantinopolitanum. Cum porro in iisdem mss. huic epistolae subjiciatur epistola 78, quae per hos Casterium et Asclepiadem Constantinopolim missa fuit anno sequenti idibus Aprilis, censemus hanc notationem ad eamdem epistolam 78 potius quam ad praesentem esse referendam: neque enim eos clericos bis transmisisse et hoc et sequenti anno ullum indicium, ulla probabilitas est.
This notation of the day, the month and the consuls is missing in the Grimani manuscript. It is read, however, in our manuscripts and in the printed editions. Only, after the word Valentiniano, Aug. VII should be supplied. Both manuscripts of collection 12 add, immediately after the consular note, by Carterius and Asclepiades, deacons of Constantinople; corruptly. For since in letter 80, chap. 1, mention is made of Casterius, otherwise Carterius, a presbyter, and of Asclepiades, a deacon of Constantinople, we believe one should read by Carterius, or Casterius, the presbyter, and Asclepiades, the deacon of Constantinople. Further, since in the same manuscripts letter 78 is placed after this letter, which was sent to Constantinople by this Casterius and Asclepiades in the following year on the ides of April, we judge that this notation should be referred to that letter 78 rather than to the present one: for there is no indication, no probability, that [he] sent those clerics twice, both in this year and in the following.
(g) ‹anchor: "EPISTOLA" (heading of Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Al. 56. Quae autem erat 75, nunc 95. Die 8 vel 9 Nov. an. 450.
Otherwise 56. The one that was 75 is now 95. On 8 or 9 November, in the year 450.
(h) ‹anchor: before "AD FAUSTUM ET MARTINUM" (title of Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Edita fuit a Quesnello ex ms. Grimanico collect. 18. Nos eamdem contulimus cum Ratisponensi collect. 19.
It was edited by Quesnel from the Grimani manuscript of collection 18. We have collated it with the Ratisbon manuscript of collection 19.
(i) ‹anchor: "MARTINO presbyteris" (Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Voces et archimandritis adjecimus ex cod. Ratisp. Quesnellus addidit, a pari, quod noster codex ignorat, et contextus pluralis numeri excludit.
We have added the words and archimandrites from the Ratisbon manuscript. Quesnel added a pari [of equal rank], which our manuscript does not know and the context, in the plural number, excludes.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Intolerabile esse scribit Occidentalibus episcopis, quod Ephesi contra fidem actum est. — II. Antichristo militare tam Nestorium quam Eutychen; contra quos Ecclesia profitetur non unam naturam, sed unam se adorare personam.
SYNOPSIS. — I. He writes that what was done at Ephesus against the faith is intolerable to the Western bishops. — II. That Nestorius and Eutyches alike serve Antichrist; against whom the Church professes that it adores not one nature but one Person.
(f) continued from col 901, set in n901.
(j) ‹anchor: "ut quia propitio" (Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Ratisp., Deo. Idcirco autem multum catholicorum aucta libertas dicitur, quia Marcianus novus imperator catholicis favebat. Hoc primum indicium est electionis Marciani, quam quidem Maximinum comitem ejusdem imperatoris ministrum attulisse, ut a Valentiniano approbaretur, satis credibile est.
The Ratisbon manuscript: God. And the freedom of the catholics is said to have been much increased for this reason, that Marcian, the new emperor, favoured the catholics. This is the first indication of Marcian's election; and it is quite credible that the count Maximinus, a minister of the same emperor, brought [news of] it, that it might be approved by Valentinian.
(k) ‹anchor: "aucta libertas," (Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Quesnellus ex Grimanico, sumatis. Magis placuit lectio Ratisp.
Quesnel, from the Grimani manuscript: sumatis [take]. The Ratisbon reading pleased us more.
(l) ‹anchor: "Omnis" (Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Ratisp. omittit spiritus, et secundo loco Christum.
The Ratisbon manuscript omits spirit, and, in the second place, Christ.
(m) ‹anchor: "fides apostolicis" (Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
In eodem codice desunt voces atque evangelicis.
In the same manuscript the words and evangelical are missing.
(n) ‹anchor: "ex quo" (Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Sic noster Ratisp. Quesnellus ex Grim., aeternum Patris.
So our Ratisbon manuscript. Quesnel, from the Grimani: eternal [Word] of the Father.
(o) ‹anchor: "uniti, state" (Letter LXXV)› · printed under col 902
Grim. ms. et Quesnellus, confidenter. Melius in Ratisponensi.
The Grimani manuscript and Quesnel: confidently. Better in the Ratisbon manuscript.