PL 54 · cols. 495–498
Sermones S. Leoni Magno attributi (Appendix ad primam partem operum S. Leonis Magni), I-XX
Sermons VIII–IX
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 495–498
Sermons VIII–IX
(a) ‹anchor: Communis est ergo› · call in col 495
Al., inferius simul ac superius.
Elsewhere, inferius simul ac superius.
(printed under page 253)
(b) ‹anchor: ubi victor› · call in col 495
Quidam codices omittunt, a morte.
Some codices omit a morte.
(printed under page 253)
(c) ‹anchor: et ideo› · call in col 495
In editione Latina Chrysostomi: Bene Psalmista loquitur de hac peculiariter die, dicens. Cod. Barber., peculiari.
In the Latin edition of Chrysostom: Bene Psalmista loquitur de hac peculiariter die, dicens. The Barberini codex has peculiari.
(printed under page 253)
(d) ‹anchor: in ea (Ps. CXVII. 54).› · call in col 495
Editiones Chrysostomi: Praenuntians enim Dominicam resurrectionem. Mox quidam codd., non superius tantum, sed etiam inferius, ubi nonnulli mss. omittunt etiam; editi autem Chrys. habent et pro etiam.
The editions of Chrysostom: Praenuntians enim Dominicam resurrectionem. Next, some codices have non superius tantum, sed etiam inferius, where several manuscripts omit etiam; the printed Chrysostom, however, has et for etiam.
(printed under page 253)
(e) ‹anchor: salutiferae exsultationis› · call in col 495
Al., induxit. Mox pro inferorum, quae vox in Barber. omittitur, cod. Casanat. habet inferiorum.
Elsewhere, induxit. Next, for inferorum, a word omitted in the Barberini codex, the Casanatense codex has inferiorum.
(printed under page 253)
(f) ‹anchor: evangelista qui› · call in col 495
Edit. Chrysostomi addunt modo.
The editions of Chrysostom add modo.
(printed under page 253)
(g) ‹anchor: suae splendorem› · call in col 495
In edit. Chrys.: Luxit sempiternae naturae splendore.
In the edition of Chrysostom: Luxit sempiternae naturae splendore.
(printed under page 253)
ADMONITIO IN SEQUENTEM SERMONEM.
ADMONITION ON THE FOLLOWING SERMON.
In editionibus Latinis S. Joannis Chrysostomi hom. 7 de Resurrectione editus est, et nunc quoque in Breviario monachorum congregationis Casinensis Chrysostomi nomine inscriptus legitur. Cum vero non Graeci, sed Latini antiqui auctoris manifeste sit, sicut et alii earumdem editionum sermones Chrysostomo perperam attributi, hinc in Graecis hujus doctoris editionibus desideratur. Porro in manuscriptis collect. 1 et 5 ac in duobus recentioribus Lectionariis Vat. 6451 et 6452 Leoni inscriptum reperimus; eumque P. Joannes Chrysostomus Trombellius, qui editiones Latinas Chrysostomi non consuluit, ex ms. Bononiensi collect. 2 veluti ineditum Leonis nomine impressit inter veterum Patrum Opuscula tom. II, part. I, pag. 231, ubi tamen eumdem Leoni suppositum censuit. Stylus a Leonino non multum discrepat: intercalaris vero formula Dilectissimi, quater repetita, Leonem nostrum praeferre posse videtur. Auctor certe Latinus est, et alicujus quidem Occidentalis Ecclesiae episcopus, in qua ritus vigebat tegendi capitulum Evangelii S. Joannis, In principio erat Verbum, ipso Paschatis die, seu in vigiliis Paschae, ut illa indicant: Evangelista qui lectus est, Et lux, inquit, quae in tenebris lucet, etc., nec non quae ante finem subjiciuntur: Audistis evangelistam dicentem hodie quia quicumque in Deum credunt, hi filii Dei sunt. Dedit enim potestatem filios Dei fieri his qui credunt in nomine ejus, qui non ex sanguinibus, neque ex voluntate carnis, neque ex voluntate viri, sed ex Deo nati sunt. Quae verba dicta neophytis nocte baptizatis, rationem ejus capituli legendi probe insinuant, ut scilicet illi ex ea lectione intelligerent divinum donum, quo Dei Filius natus filius hominis, ipsos homines per baptisma regeneratos ad dignitatem evexit filiorum Dei. Cum vero nulla Romanae Ecclesiae documenta a Cassandro, Hitorpio, Mabillonio, Frontone, cardinali Thomasio atque Martene edita hunc ritum praeferant, licet Leonis aevo posteriora sint, impediunt tamen ne quis Leonem hujus sermonis auctorem affirmet.
In the Latin editions of St John Chrysostom it has been published as homily 7 On the Resurrection, and even now it is read in the Breviary of the monks of the Cassinese congregation inscribed with the name of Chrysostom. But since it is manifestly the work not of a Greek but of an ancient Latin author, as are also other sermons of the same editions wrongly attributed to Chrysostom, it is for this reason wanting in the Greek editions of this doctor. Further, in the manuscripts of collections 1 and 5 and in two more recent Vatican Lectionaries, 6451 and 6452, we have found it inscribed to Leo; and Father Joannes Chrysostomus Trombellius, who did not consult the Latin editions of Chrysostom, printed it as though unpublished, under Leo's name, from the Bologna manuscript of collection 2, among the Opuscula of the ancient Fathers, tome II, part I, page 231, where nevertheless he judged it to be falsely ascribed to Leo. The style does not differ much from the Leonine; and indeed the interposed formula Dilectissimi (Dearly beloved), four times repeated, seems able to suggest our Leo. The author is certainly a Latin, and indeed a bishop of some Western Church, in which there prevailed the rite of reading [printed: tegendi, for legendi] the chapter of the Gospel of St John, In the beginning was the Word, on the very day of Easter, or on the vigil of Easter, as these words indicate: The evangelist who has been read says, And the light which shines in the darkness, etc., and likewise those which are subjoined before the end: You have heard the evangelist saying today that whosoever believe in God, these are sons of God. For He gave power to become sons of God to those who believe in His name, who were born not of bloods, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. These words, spoken to neophytes baptized in the night, rightly intimate the reason for reading that chapter, namely that from that lesson they might understand the divine gift by which the Son of God, born son of man, raised men themselves, regenerated through baptism, to the dignity of sons of God. But since no documents of the Roman Church published by Cassander, Hittorp, Mabillon, Fronto, Cardinal Tommasi and Martène exhibit this rite, these, although they are later than Leo's age, nevertheless prevent anyone from affirming Leo to be the author of this sermon.
Hic autem ritus erat in Africa celebris, uti discimus ex Augustini serm. 119 et 120, in quibus idem Evangelii capitulum explicatur: quos quidem sermones PP. Maurini not. 1 in Sermonem 119, non in die Paschae, sed in nocte sabbati sancti habitos putant. Hinc alicui Africano hic sermo adjudicandus videtur. Ut vero nihil dubitationis supersit, duo Lectionaria Vaticana 1270 et vetustissimum 3835 eum Augustino inscribunt; cui pariter eumdem convenire confirmat interpretatio antiqua versiculorum psal. 117 et 125, quam apud Augustinum iisdem verbis expressam reperimus. Hunc unum sermonem, licet in Chrysostomo olim editum, appendici inseruimus, quia omnium maxime Leone dignus, ex nostris codicibus emendari aliquot in locis potuit.
Now this rite was well known in Africa, as we learn from Augustine's sermons 119 and 120, in which the same chapter of the Gospel is expounded: which sermons the Maurist Fathers, in note 1 on Sermon 119, think were delivered not on the day of Easter but in the night of Holy Saturday. Hence this sermon seems to be assignable to some African. And that no doubt may remain, two Vatican Lectionaries, 1270 and the very ancient 3835, inscribe it to Augustine; and that it likewise befits him is confirmed by the ancient interpretation of the verses of Psalms 117 and 125, which we have found expressed in the same words in Augustine. This one sermon, although formerly published in Chrysostom, we have inserted in the appendix because, being of all of them the most worthy of Leo, it could be emended in a number of places from our codices.
<!-- note: the admonition is printed in italic across the full width of the page (spanning cols 495 and 496), directly under the running head; it is set whole here, heading plus two paragraphs. Nothing of it runs over from the previous page or on to the next. Below it, in two columns, follows the title SERMO VIII, De Resurrectione Domini I, and the sermon text (Cap. I in col 495), then the foot notes (a)–(q). The quoted phrases printed in roman within the italic are not distinguished typographically here. "tegendi capitulum" is set as printed (apparently a misprint for "legendi"); the point after "ms" before "Bononiensi" is not clearly visible in the scan. -->
(h) ‹anchor: illud quod› · call in col 496
Al., ibidem.
Elsewhere, ibidem.
(printed under page 253)
(i) ‹anchor: nobis (Ps. CXVII, 27).› · call in col 496
Ita ex cod. Casanatensi, melius quam alias: Et quod adhuc loquitur: Constituite, inquit, etc. Edit. Chrys.: Et quid adhuc addidit: Constituite, inquit.
So from the Casanatense codex, better than elsewhere: Et quod adhuc loquitur: Constituite, inquit, etc. The edition of Chrysostom: Et quid adhuc addidit: Constituite, inquit.
(printed under page 253)
(j) ‹anchor: cornu altaris;› · call in col 496
Ita cod. Barber. Ms. Casanat.: Completum est hodie. Editiones Chrys.: Completum etiam hoc hodie.
So the Barberini codex. The Casanatense manuscript: Completum est hodie. The editions of Chrysostom: Completum etiam hoc hodie.
(printed under page 253)
(k) ‹anchor: religiosis conventibus› · call in col 496
Sic ex codice Casanatensi; et refertur ad Ecclesiam. Alias, plena sint, et idcirco P. Trombelius addidit omnia, quae vox legitur editionibus Chrysostomi ante religiosis.
So from the Casanatense codex; and it refers to the Church. Elsewhere, plena sint, and for that reason Fr. Trombelli added omnia, a word read in the editions of Chrysostom before religiosis.
(printed under page 253)
(l) ‹anchor: Dies ergo› · call in col 496
Addidimus hic ex editionibus Chrysostomi.
We have added hic from the editions of Chrysostom.
(printed under page 253)
(m) ‹anchor: resurrectionis et vitae.› · call in col 496
Codices: Fecit enim Quadragesimam gratiorem. Praetulimus editiones Chrysostomi, ex quibus reorum scripsimus pro eorum, quod in iisdem mss. legitur.
The codices: Fecit enim Quadragesimam gratiorem. We have preferred the editions of Chrysostom, from which we have written reorum for eorum, which is read in the same manuscripts.
(printed under page 253)
(n) ‹anchor: tristitiam reorum› · call in col 496
Cod. Bonon., victi, pro quo P. Trombellius posuit, adjecti. Sed nostri codices cum edition. Chrys. habent juncti.
The Bologna codex has victi, for which Fr. Trombelli put adjecti. But our codices, with the editions of Chrysostom, have juncti.
(printed under page 253)
(o) ‹anchor: praemia exsultationis.› · call in col 496
Editio Trombellii, sciatque.
Trombelli's edition has sciatque.
(printed under page 253)
(p) ‹anchor: beatitudinum jam› · call in col 496
Praepositionem in ex editis Chrysostomi adjecimus.
We have added the preposition in from the printed Chrysostom.
(printed under page 253)
(q) ‹anchor: praesentibus continetur.› · call in col 496
In ms. Casanat. hic habet sic, et dein, pro sic habet sicut.
In the Casanatense manuscript it has sic here, and then, for sic, it has sicut.
(printed under page 253)
(a) ‹anchor: ut› · call in col 497
Mss. codd. Leonini, victorem. Trombellius emendavit, candorem. Nos nitorem ex edit. Chrys. et duobus Vat. reposuimus.
The manuscript codices of Leo have victorem. Trombelli emended to candorem. We have restored nitorem from the edition of Chrysostom and two Vatican codices.
(printed under page 254)
(b) ‹anchor: Dei sunt.› · call in col 497 (the call is printed "(b" in the text, without its closing bracket)
Edit. Chrys: Dedit enim, inquit filios Dei fieri iis qui. Dein ex cod. Casanat. addidimus verba: Qui credunt in nomine ejus.
The edition of Chrysostom: Dedit enim, inquit filios Dei fieri iis qui. Then from the Casanatense codex we have added the words: Qui credunt in nomine ejus.
(printed under page 254)
(c) ‹anchor: Superest ut conservetis› · call in col 497
Ita cod. Casanat. et alii duo Vat., uti optime emendavit Trombellius, cum alii codd. habeant, per sanctam vitam, conversationem, et sanctae originis dignitatem, vel per sanctam vitae conversationem, et sanctae, etc. Edit. Chrys., per sanctae vitae conversationem, sanctae regenerationis dignitatem.
So the Casanatense codex and two other Vatican ones, as Trombelli very rightly emended, whereas other codices have per sanctam vitam, conversationem, et sanctae originis dignitatem, or per sanctam vitae conversationem, et sanctae, etc. The edition of Chrysostom: per sanctae vitae conversationem, sanctae regenerationis dignitatem.
(printed under page 254)
(d) ‹anchor: custodiat corda› · call in col 497
Editiones Chrys. et codd. Vat. addunt et corpora.
The editions of Chrysostom and the Vatican codices add et corpora.
(printed under page 254)
(e) ‹anchor: Jesum Christum,› · call in col 497
Eaedem editiones: qui cum Patre et Spiritu sancto vivit et regnat in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
The same editions: qui cum Patre et Spiritu sancto vivit et regnat in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
(printed under page 254)
Nunc editus ex Lectionario Patavino S. Antonii, ubi perperam Leonis papae nomen praefert.
Now published from the Paduan Lectionary of Saint Anthony, where it wrongly bears the name of Pope Leo at its head.