Migne Reading Room

PL 6 · cols. 545–630

L. Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius, Divinarum institutionum liber V, De justitia

Editors' preface

PL 6:545
LIBER QUINTUS. DE JUSTITIA.
BOOK FIVE. ON JUSTICE.
CAPUT PRIMUM.
CHAPTER ONE.
De non damnandis reis, inaudita causa; unde Litteras sacras contempserint philosophi; de primis assertoribus religionis christianae.
On not condemning the accused with their case unheard; why the philosophers despised the sacred Letters; on the first defenders of the Christian religion.
Editors' notes and page, col. 545

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters). The Scultetus argumentum above the book title is editor's synopsis, not a footnote, and is not set here. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Constantine Imperator Maxime› · lemma in col 546

Constantine imperator Maxime. Tria haec verba absunt a mss. 1 Bonon. antiq., 1 Reg., Pal., 1 Lips. et edit. Is.; extant autem in caeteris tum scriptis, tum editis. Hoc primum caput est veluti praefatio totius (continues)

"Constantine, most great emperor." These three words are missing from the manuscripts: the older Bologna 1, Regius 1, the Palatine, Leipzig 1, and the Isaeus edition; but they are present in the rest, both manuscript and printed. This first chapter is as it were the preface of the whole (continues)

(printed under page 286)

Page

  • running head: 545 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT (cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹bescunt coram justis›; B ‹plane occaecatos, vel inde›; C ‹Ciceronem doceat, qui Justitiam›; D ‹num et justum nesciat›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: editors' matter above the band (belongs to the previous unit; cut on receipt, not set in this unit): the synopsis (argumentum) of Book V, continued from the previous column, beginning ‹bescunt coram justis›; the first word is a fragment of a word broken from the column before (probably erubescunt); the last word ‹se› continues in col. 546 (abstinea-); a stray speck after ‹Postremo› (Postremo.'quod) is not set; a stray mark before ‹philosophi› in the chapter summary is not set; full-width title LIBER QUI[NTUS] DE JUSTITI[A] between rules after the synopsis is set once in the part (see below); full-width heading VARIORUM NOT[AE] is not set; the variorum note beginning ‹Constantine imperator Maxime› at the page foot is left for the later pass
  • other: a full-width band stands across cols 545/546 in mid-page: the 8 paragraph(s) above it in col 546 and the 8 above it in col 545 belong to the previous unit and were cut on receipt (Q2a: corrected; the earlier wording said they were set here); the band itself (its title lines) is set here, at the move, with full_width
  • other: the column opens with the end of the previous work (another unit); not set here: the unit begins at the band and CAPUT
  • running head: 545 LIBER V. DE JUSTITIA. 546
  • marginal letters: A ‹bescunt coram justis esse nequam›; B ‹plane occaecatos, vel inde patere›; C ‹Ciceronem doceat, qui Justitiam›; D ‹num et justum nesciat, justus ab omni›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: Upper part of the page (both columns, to "SCULTETUS.") is editors' prose: the end of Scultetus's analysis of Book V (Capp. 9-24); not set. The title band LIBER QUINTUS. / DE JUSTITIA. is printed full width between rules and set once here as the title of Book V. Running head prints the column number as "54ŏ" (545, worn type). VARIORUM NOTAE at the foot (full-width caption, notes in two columns) are apparatus; not set.
PL 6:546
Non est apud me dubium, Constantine Imperator Maxime, quin hoc opus nostrum, quo singularis ille
There is no doubt in my mind, Constantine, Greatest Emperor, that this work of ours, by which that singular
Editors' notes and page, col. 546

Page

  • running head: V. DE JUSTITIA. 546 (left end of the running head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A abstineat: Idem ex definitione; B tione et hortamentis agere; C Nullius momenti esse exceptionem; D et 24). SCULTETUS.
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: editors' matter: Scultetus's analysis of Book V, continued from col. 545 ("abstineat: Idem ex definitione...", ending "SCULTETUS."), set; the column begins mid-sentence with "abstineat". Full-width title "[LIBE]R QUINTUS. [D]E JUSTITIA." stands between Scultetus's analysis and the opening of Book V, cut off at the left edge, not set. Full-width heading "[V]ARIORUM NOTAE." and the notes below it are page-foot apparatus, not set. C sits between the lines "Nullius momenti" and "puniendos esse"; placement UNSURE. A speck before "Cap. 21" is not set. The italic side note "Litteras asserto-" belongs to the left column (545).
  • other: the 8 paragraph(s) of this column above the full-width band are set under col 545 (reading order, moved on receipt)
  • running head: 545 LIBER V. DE JUSTITIA. 546
  • marginal letters: A ‹abstineat: Idem ex definitione stultitiae›; B ‹tione et hortamentis agere eos debere›; C ‹puniendos esse qui destruunt religiones›; D ‹et 24). SCULTETUS.›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: The upper part of this column, to "et 24). SCULTETUS.", is editors' prose (Scultetus's analysis); not set. The author's text starts below the full-width title band and ends this column mid-sentence at "ille" (whole word; continues in col. 547). The Variorum note at the foot (on "Constantine imperator Maxime": missing in some manuscripts) is apparatus; not set.
PL 6:547
rerum conditor et hujus immensi rector asseritur, si quis attigerit ex istis inepte religiosis (ut sunt nimia superstitione impatientes), insectetur etiam maledictis, et vix lecto fortasse principio, affligat, projiciat, execretur; seque inexpiabili scelere contaminari atque astringi putet, si haec aut legat patienter, aut audiat. Ab hoc tamen, si fieri potest, humanitatis jure postulamus, ut non prius damnet, quam universa cognoverit. Nam si sacrilegis, et proditoribus, et veneficis potestas defendendi sui datur, nec praedamnari quemquam incognita causa licet: non injuste petere videmur, ut si quis erit ille qui inciderit in haec, si leget, perlegat, si audiet, sententiam differat in extremum. Sed novi hominum pertinaciam: nunquam impetrabimus. Timent enim ne a nobis revicti, manus dare aliquando, clamante ipsa veritate cogantur. Obstrepunt igitur, et intercedunt ne audiant; et oculos suos opprimunt, ne lumen videant, quod offerimus.
is asserted to be the founder of things and the ruler of this immense [universe], if any of these foolishly religious people (being, as they are, intolerant through excessive superstition) should come upon it, he will even assail it with curses, and, having perhaps scarcely read the beginning, will dash it down, throw it away, execrate it; and he will think himself defiled and bound by an inexpiable crime if he should either read or hear these things patiently. From such a man, nevertheless, if it can be done, we ask by the right of humanity that he not condemn before he has come to know the whole. For if to the sacrilegious, and to traitors, and to poisoners the power of defending themselves is granted, and it is not permitted for anyone to be condemned beforehand with his case unheard, we do not seem to ask unjustly that, whoever he may be who has come upon these things, if he reads, he read them through; if he hears, he defer his judgement to the end. But I know the obstinacy of men: we shall never obtain it. For they fear lest, refuted by us, they be compelled at some time, with truth itself crying out, to give up and yield. Therefore they make a din and interpose so as not to hear; and they shut their eyes so as not to see the light which we offer.
Editors' notes and page, col. 547

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Constantine Imperator Maxime› · col 547

libri, in quo queritur de christiani nominis persecutoribus, quod indicta causa supplicium de innoxiis christianis sumere pergant. Idem prorsus est argumentum cum Apologetico Tertulliani.

(continued) book, in which he complains of the persecutors of the Christian name, that they go on inflicting punishment on innocent Christians with their case unheard. The argument is exactly the same as that of Tertullian's Apology.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Immensi rector› · col 547

Immensi rector. 1 Colb. a secunda manu, et 6 edit. ferunt, immensi operis rector, 1 Colbert. rec. et 1 Brun., universi rector. Lactant. lib. II, cap. 5, universi artifex; et cap. 17, rector universi.

"Ruler of the immeasurable." Colbert 1 in a second hand and six editions have "ruler of the immeasurable work"; the more recent Colbert 1 and Brunswick 1, "ruler of the universe." Lactantius, book II, chapter 5, "maker of the universe"; and chapter 17, "ruler of the universe."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Impatientes› · col 547

Impatientes. Rost., Ven. 1471, 72, utraque 78, prave impartientes; hinc Heuman. impotentes rescribit. At mss. Guelf., Lips., Goth., Reimm., Ven. 1493, 97, Parrh., Paris.; reliqui, impatientes, quod servo ob sequentia, legat patienter aut audiat. Bun.

"Impatient." The Rostock edition, Venice 1471 and 72, and both of 1478 wrongly read "impartientes"; hence Heumann rewrites "impotentes." But the Wolfenbüttel, Leipzig, Gotha and Reimmann manuscripts, Venice 1493 and 97, Parrhasius, Paris, and the rest have "impatientes," which I keep because of what follows, "let him read patiently or hear." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Humanitatis jure› · col 547

Humanitatis jure. Id est, jure gentium, aut etiam naturae.

"By the law of humanity." That is, by the law of nations, or even of nature.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ut non prius damnet› · col 547

Ut non prius damnet. Aperte in his sequentibus Tertullianum sequitur in Apolog. cap. 1: Unum gestit (veritas) interdum, ne ignorata damnetur. Item Minuc. Fel., cap. 27, fin.: Ut ante nos incipiant homines odisse, quam nosse; ne cognitos aut imitari possint aut damnare non possint. His similia dat Lindenbr. ad Ammiani, l. XV, c. 7, pag. 99: Nec visum hominem nec auditum damnare nefas ultimum, etc. Bun.

"That he not condemn before." In what follows he plainly follows Tertullian, Apology chapter 1: "One thing (truth) sometimes longs for, not to be condemned unknown." Likewise Minucius Felix, end of chapter 27: "So that men begin to hate us before they know us, lest, knowing us, they should either be able to imitate us or be unable to condemn us." Lindenbrog gives similar passages on Ammianus, book XV, chapter 7, page 99: "To condemn a man neither seen nor heard is the ultimate wrong," etc. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Cognoverit› · col 547

Cognoverit. Nam si christianum esse tunc causa capitalis erat, jure gentium requirebatur plenissima causae cognitio, ut jureconsulti tradunt.

"Has examined." For if being a Christian was then a capital charge, the law of nations required the fullest examination of the case, as the jurists teach.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nam si sacrilegis› · col 547

Nam si sacrilegis, etc. Aristides altera in Platonem orat. laudat illud, Πάταξον μὲν, ἄκουσον δέ. Lex fuit Lycurgi περὶ ἀκρίτων, ut eam vocat Sext. Empiric. III, quae de indemnatis supplicium sumi vetabat, ait Val. Max. VII, cap. 3, 12. Vide etiam Ambros. epistol. 28; Salvian., lib. VIII; Augustin. epist. 50 et 372. Grotius. — Tacitus II Annal.: Nec enim prohibendus reus, quominus cuncta proferat, quibus innocentia ejus sublevari possit. In Senecae Apolog.: Dic mihi, etc., quare quemquam ex his quos quasque occidisti, antequam de causa cognosceres, antequam audires damnasti.

"For if to the sacrilegious," etc. Aristides, in his second oration against Plato, praises the saying "Strike, but hear." There was a law of Lycurgus "concerning the unjudged," as Sextus Empiricus III calls it, which forbade punishment to be inflicted on the uncondemned, says Valerius Maximus VII, chapter 3, 12. See also Ambrose, letter 28; Salvian, book VIII; Augustine, letters 50 and 372. Grotius. — Tacitus, Annals II: "For the accused must not be prevented from bringing forward everything by which his innocence may be relieved." In Seneca's Apocolocyntosis: "Tell me," etc., "why did you condemn any of those men and women you killed before you examined the case, before you heard them?"

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ut si quis erit ille, qui› · col 547

Ut si quis erit ille, qui. Apparet in reliquis imitatio Ciceronis ex Actione 1 in Verr., c. 18: Si quis erit, qui... desideret, audiet. Non male ed. Paris. 1513, in Lactantio verba (si quis erit) parenthesi includit, qua ratione reliqua bene fluunt. Bun.

"So that if there is anyone who." In the rest an imitation of Cicero appears, from the first Action against Verres, chapter 18: "If there is anyone who … wishes, he shall hear." The Paris edition of 1513 does not do badly in enclosing the words "if there is anyone" in Lactantius in parentheses, by which the rest flows well. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Manus dare aliquando› · col 547

Manus dare aliquando. Id est victos se agnoscere. Quibusdam manus dare idem est ac consentire; sic Virgilius lib. XI Aeneid. Servius, manus dedisset, consensisset. In Clementis recognit. lib. II, Rufino interprete. Seneca Nat. quaest. lib. II, cap. 38: Puta me tibi manus dare et fateri, hoc quoque fato esse comprehensum: et Lucretius libro II: Si tibi vera videntur, Dede manus. Elmenhorst.

"At some time to give their hands." That is, to acknowledge themselves beaten. For some, "to give the hands" is the same as to consent; so Virgil, Aeneid book XI; Servius: "had given his hands," that is, had consented. So in the Recognitions of Clement, book II, in Rufinus's translation. Seneca, Natural Questions book II, chapter 38: "Suppose I give you my hands and admit that this too is included in fate"; and Lucretius, book II: "If they seem true to you, give up your hands." Elmenhorst.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Obstrepunt› · col 547, runs into col 548

Obstrepunt. Cap. 4: Obstrepere proprie est strepitu facto turbare et impedire. Vid. Dukerum ad Flor. lib. II, c. 19, p. 469. Apte Curtius, lib. VI, c. 9: Fremitus undique indignantium... obstrepebat. Add., Pitisc. ad Curt. lib. VII, cap. 7.

"They make an uproar." Chapter 4: "obstrepere" properly means to disturb and hinder by making a din. See Duker on Florus, book II, chapter 19, page 469. Aptly Curtius, book VI, chapter 9: "The roar of men indignant on every side … drowned him out." Add Pitiscus on Curtius, book VII, chapter 7.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Intercedunt› · col 548

Intercedunt. Mss. 3, Reg. rec., 4 Colbert., Brun. et edit. Paris. 1525, atque Graph., intercidunt.

"They interpose." Regius 3 (the more recent), Colbert 4, the Brunswick manuscript, the Paris edition of 1525 and Gryphius read "intercidunt."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et oculos suos opprimunt› · col 548

Et oculos suos opprimunt. Minutius, ignorare ingerentem se oculis claritatem coelestem vocat. Vide Paulum II Cor. IV, v. 4. — Oculos suos opprimunt. Heumannus scribit, oculos suos comprimunt. Non opus a consensu omnium librorum abire, et elegantem vocem cum notiori commutare. Ita praeiverunt alii; Valer. Max. l. II, c. 6: Filiarum manus ad supremum opprimendorum oculorum officium advocavit, ubi consule Vorstium. Pari modo dicunt Latini, os, ora, fauces opprimere. Notum illud Terentii, os opprime. Ovid., liv. III, Metam. 5, seqq.: ....... Voluit Deus ora loquentis Opprimere...... Bun.

"And they press shut their eyes." Minucius calls it "being ignorant of the heavenly brightness thrusting itself upon the eyes." See Paul, 2 Corinthians 4:4. — "They press shut their eyes." Heumann writes "comprimunt." There is no need to depart from the agreement of all the books and exchange an elegant word for a more familiar one. Others led the way in this: Valerius Maximus, book II, chapter 6: "He summoned his daughters' hands to the last office of pressing shut his eyes," on which consult Vorst. In the same way Latin speakers say to press shut the mouth, the lips, the throat. Well known is Terence's "shut your mouth." Ovid, Metamorphoses book III, 5 and following: "… the god wished to stop the mouth of the speaker …" Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quo plane ipsi diffidentiam› · col 548

Quo plane ipsi diffidentiam, etc. Mss. 2 Reg. rec. et 1 Lips. Quod. In 1, Reg. et 3, Lips. est diffidentia.— Quo plane ipsi diffidentiam... ostendunt. Revocavi lectionem omnium editionum ante Cellarium ex Goth. et Reimm. conformem nostri stylo l. VI, c. 19. Quo plane ostendunt. Cellarii lectio, quod diffidentia ostendunt, minus planum et commodum sensum habet. Bun.

"By which they plainly show their own distrust," etc. Regius 2 (the more recent) and Leipzig 1 read "Quod." In Regius 1 and Leipzig 3 it is "diffidentia." — "By which they plainly … show their distrust." I have restored the reading of all the editions before Cellarius, from the Gotha and Reimmann manuscripts, which agrees with our author's style in book VI, chapter 19: "By which they plainly show." Cellarius's reading, "quod diffidentia ostendunt," gives a less plain and fitting sense. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Audent› · col 548

Audent. Heuman. legit audeant.

"They dare." Heumann reads "audeant."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Medio› · col 548

Medio. Hic versus ex Ennio lib. VIII, Annal. De quo vide A. Gellium lib. XX, cap. 9. Vide etiam Ciceronem in Orat. pro Murena num. 30.

"From the midst." This verse is from Ennius, Annals book VIII. On it see Aulus Gellius, book XX, chapter 9. See also Cicero, Oration for Murena, number 30.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Constare de ipsa innocentia› · col 548

Constare de ipsa innocentia. Heuman. de ipsorum innocentia legit. Nihil mutandum. Iterum, Epit. c. 52: Incognita causa tamquam nocentissimos damnant, qui constare de ipsa innocentia noluerunt. Phrasis est Quintiliani l. 7: Instit. 2 ed. Burm., p. 601: Si prius de innocentia nostra constiterit. Bun.

"That their very innocence be established." Heumann reads "their own innocence." Nothing should be changed. Again, Epitome chapter 52: "With the case unexamined they condemn as most guilty those whose very innocence they refused to have established." The phrase is Quintilian's, Institutes book 7, chapter 2, Burman's edition, page 601: "If our innocence has first been established." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Corrigere se non possint› · col 548

Corrigere se non possint. Ita solus Goth.; at reliqui scripti omnes et editi, corrigere se possint, sine particula negandi. Infra dicit: Quoniam ipsi saluti suae repugnant. Bun.

"They cannot correct themselves." So the Gotha manuscript alone; but all the other manuscripts and editions have "they could correct themselves," without the negative particle. Below he says: "Since they themselves fight against their own salvation." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Coacervant› · col 548

Coacervant. Sic legunt mss. et impressi. In Bonon. legitur coacerbant, pro coacervant, b, pro v posito. Hoc codice antiquo fretus Thomasius putat legendum esse coacerbant, quasi dicas aggravant: quam loquendi formulam valde latinam, ac sensum optimum putat idem Thomasius. — Coacervant. Coacerbant, inquit Thomasius, legendum est ex antiquo codice; nam verba ipsa acerbare et exacerbare sunt valde latina: sensus vero ipse est optimus, ut dicat eos non contentos esse, quod suos errores sequantur, nisi eos crudelitate sua acerbiores faciant. Quod si legas, errores coacervant, nulla est apta sententia, et apparet (continues)

"They heap up." So the manuscripts and printed editions read. In the Bologna manuscript "coacerbant" is read for "coacervant," with b put for v. Relying on this ancient codex, Thomasius thinks "coacerbant" should be read, as if to say "they aggravate"; Thomasius considers this a very Latin turn of speech and the best sense. — "They heap up." "Coacerbant," says Thomasius, should be read from the ancient codex; for the verbs "acerbare" and "exacerbare" are very Latin, and the sense itself is the best, namely that he says they are not content to follow their own errors unless they make them more bitter by their cruelty. But if you read "they heap up their errors," there is no fitting sense, and it appears (continues)

(printed under page 287)

Page

  • running head: 547 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVI[...] (cut off at the image edge; printed as LACTANTH by worn type)
  • marginal letters: A rerum conditor et hujus immensi; B manus dare aliquando, clamante (beside the gap between quam impetrabimus and manus dare); C 1493, 97, Parrh., Paris. (in the notes); D Max. VII, cap. 3, 12. (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with rerum, continuing from col. 546; last word of- is split across the column break (of-ferimus presumably in col. 548); the running head and the VARIORUM NOTAE heading run across both columns and are cut off at the image edge, so they are not set; the Variorum notae at the page foot (libri, in quo queritur ... Obstrepunt. Cap. 4) are left for the later pass
  • other (Q2a): in the note Et oculos suos opprimunt the page prints "liv. III" (for lib.); set as printed
PL 6:548
Quo plane ipsi diffidentiam suae perditae rationis ostendunt, cum neque cognoscere; neque congredi audent, quia sciunt se facile superari. Et idcirco disceptatione sublata,
By this they plainly show their own distrust of their lost cause, since they dare neither to examine nor to engage, because they know that they are easily overcome. And therefore, with debate removed,
Pellitur e medio sapientia, vi geritur res,
Wisdom is driven from the midst, the matter is carried on by force,
ut ait Ennius; et quia student damnare tamquam nocentes, quos utique sciunt innocentes, constare de ipsa innocentia nolunt. Quasi vero major iniquitas sit, probatam innocentiam damnasse, quam inauditam. Sed, ut dixi, verentur, ne si audierint, damnare non possint.
as Ennius says; and because they are eager to condemn as guilty those whom they certainly know to be innocent, they are unwilling that their very innocence should be established. As if indeed it were a greater iniquity to have condemned innocence that had been proved than innocence unheard. But, as I have said, they fear that, if they should hear, they could not condemn.
Et ideo cultores Dei summi, hoc est justos homines torquent, interficiunt, exterminant; nec causas odiorum reddere ipsi possunt, qui tam vehementer oderunt: quia ipsi errant, irascuntur iis qui veram viam sequuntur, et cum corrigere se possint, errores suos insuper crudelibus factis coacervant, innocentium cruore maculantur, et dicatas Deo mentes evisceratis
And therefore they torture, kill and exterminate the worshippers of the supreme God, that is, just men; nor can they themselves give the causes of their hatreds, they who hate so vehemently: because they themselves are in error, they are angry with those who follow the true way, and although they could correct themselves, they heap up their errors besides with cruel deeds, they are stained with the blood of the innocent, and minds dedicated to God from disembowelled
Editors' notes and page, col. 548

Page

  • running head: ACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. (left edge cut off; LACTANTII intended), column number 548
  • marginal letters: A ferimus. Quo plane ipsi; B oderunt : quia ipsi errant (letter stands between this line and "viam sequuntur"); C consensu omnium librorum (in the Variorum Notae); D Constare de ipsa innocentia (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "ferimus", the end of a word broken from the previous column (English supplies "we put forward"); last word "evis-" split at the column break (evisceratis, set whole here); full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE." stands below the text block and is not set; Variorum Notae below are left for the later pass; editors' matter set: (none); the verse "Pellitur e medio..." is printed on its own indented line and is set as its own line
  • other (Q2a): the Variorum notae printed under this column (from "pitu facto turbare" through "Coacervant ... et apparet") are set in n547 with their column labels
PL 6:549
corporibus extorquent. Cum talibus nunc congredi et disputare contendimus, hos ad veritatem ab inepta persuasione traducere, qui sanguinem facilius hauserint, quam verba justorum. Quid igitur? Operamne perdemus? Minime. Nam si lucrari hos a morte, ad quam concitatissime tendunt, non potuerimus; si ab illo itinere devio ad vitam lucemque revocare, quoniam ipsi saluti suae repugnant: nostros tamen confirmabimus, quorum non est stabilis, ac solidis radicibus fundata et fixa sententia. Nutant enim plurimi, ac maxime qui litterarum aliquid attigerunt. Nam et in hoc philosophi, et oratores, et poetae sunt, perniciosi quod incautos animos facile irretire possunt suavitate sermonis, et carminum dulci modulatione currentium. Mella sunt haec venenum tegentia. Ob eamque causam volui sapientiam cum Religione conjungere, ne quid studiosis inanis illa doctrina possit officere; ut jam scientia litterarum non modo nihil noceat Religioni atque justitiae, sed etiam prosit quamplurimum, si is, qui eas didicerit, sit in virtutibus instructior, et in veritate sapientior.
bodies they wring out. With such men we are now striving to engage and to dispute, to lead them across from an inept persuasion to the truth, men who would more readily drink blood than the words of the just. What then? Shall we waste our effort? By no means. For if we cannot win these men from death, towards which they are hastening most headlong; if [we cannot] call them back from that devious road to life and light, since they themselves fight against their own salvation: we shall nevertheless strengthen our own, whose conviction is not stable, nor founded and fixed on solid roots. For very many waver, and especially those who have touched something of letters. For in this both philosophers and orators and poets are pernicious, that they can easily ensnare unwary minds by the sweetness of their speech and of songs running in sweet measure. These things are honey covering poison. And for that reason I wished to join wisdom with Religion, so that that empty learning may be unable to do any harm to the studious; so that now the knowledge of letters may not only do no harm to Religion and justice, but may even profit them very greatly, if he who has learned them is better equipped in virtues and wiser in the truth.
Praeterea, etiamsi nulli alii, nobis certe proderit: delectabit se conscientia, gaudebitque mens in veritatis se luce versari; quod est animae pabulum, incredibili quadam jucunditate perfusum. Verum non est desperandum. Fortasse
Moreover, even if it profits no one else, it will certainly profit us: conscience will delight in itself, and the mind will rejoice to dwell in the light of truth; which is the food of the soul, suffused with a certain incredible pleasantness. But we must not despair. Perhaps
Editors' notes and page, col. 549

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Coacervant› · col 549

manifeste hoc ex illo, b in v mutato, factum esse. Exemplis multis ad Epitom. cap. 2 ex ms. Taurin. ostendo, antiquissimos codd. saepe b pro v ponere: unde causa hic cadit Thomasius; et coacervant, id est, concumulant, legendum. Et quis ex antiquis dixit, coacerbare? Pari vero jure errores crudelibus factis coacervant dici potest, quo Cicero pro Rosc. Amer. c. 11: Haec (maleficia) aliis nefariis cumulant atque adaugent. Bun.

(continued) plainly that the one was made from the other by changing b into v. With many examples on the Epitome, chapter 2, from the Turin manuscript, I show that the oldest codices often put b for v; so Thomasius loses his case here, and "coacervant," that is, "they pile up," should be read. And who among the ancients said "coacerbare"? With equal right one may say "they heap up their errors with cruel deeds," as Cicero, For Roscius of Ameria, chapter 11: "These (crimes) they heap up and increase with other wicked ones." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Evisceratis corporibus› · col 549

Evisceratis corporibus. Quintil. declam. 12 extr.: (Sol) ad eviscerata corpora illuxit. Cicero, II Tusc. disput. c. 9: Miserandum adspice Evisceratum corpus lacerati patris. Bun.

"With bodies disembowelled." Quintilian, Declamation 12, at the end: "(The sun) shone upon the disembowelled bodies." Cicero, Tusculan Disputations II, chapter 9: "Behold the pitiable disembowelled body of a mangled father." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ab illo itinere devio› · col 549

Ab illo itinere devio. Ed. Sublac. habet de morte.

"From that wayward road." The Subiaco edition has "from death."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Attigerunt› · col 549

Attigerunt. Sic lego cum editis et mss. praeter 3 rec. et 5 excusos, quibus est attigerint.

"They have touched." So I read with the editions and manuscripts, except three recent manuscripts and five printed editions, which have "attigerint."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Poetae perniciosi sunt› · col 549

Poetae perniciosi sunt. Quam perniciosi fuere religioni fictionibus suis! Haec causa fuit, cur Plato eos ex sua republica expulerit, in πολιτ. I, et in libris de Legibus. Imo Pythagoras Homerum apud inferos torqueri dicebat, ideo quod istas fabulas de diis invenerit, et poemati suo intexuerit. Monet etiam Arist. lib. VIII πολιτ., in puerorum institutione magnam esse adhibendam curam quoad fabularum narrationem. Ritterhusius.

"Poets are pernicious." How pernicious they were to religion with their fictions! This was the reason why Plato expelled them from his commonwealth, in the Republic I and in the books of the Laws. Indeed Pythagoras used to say that Homer was tormented in the underworld because he invented those fables about the gods and wove them into his poem. Aristotle too, Politics book VIII, warns that great care must be taken in the education of boys as regards the telling of fables. Rittershusius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Mella sunt haec venenum tegentia› · col 549

Mella sunt haec venenum tegentia. Haec habentur in decem editis, et in antiquissimo 900 annorum ms. Reg., in 1 al. item Regio, Goth., Marm., nisi quod in 1 antiq. Reg. est venena; in 3 aliis, agentia. Absunt autem ab uno Bonon. antiq., Cauc., 8 Reg., 6 Colbert., 2 Sorbon. ac 16 aliis, et a 9 editis. Mella sunt, id ab Horatio poemata melliflua dulcedine fluentia. Sic mellitus gladius, et lethale mulsum, proverbium est.

"These are honey covering poison." These words are found in ten editions and in the very ancient Regius manuscript, nine hundred years old, likewise in another Regius 1, the Gotha and the Marmoutier, except that the ancient Regius 1 has "poisons" and three others "acting." But they are absent from the one ancient Bologna manuscript, the Cauci, Regius 8, Colbert 6, Sorbonne 2 and sixteen others, and from nine editions. "They are honey": that is, from Horace, poems flowing with honeyed sweetness. So "the honeyed sword" and "the deadly mead" are proverbs.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non modo nihil noceat… sed… prosit› · col 549, runs into col 550

Non modo nihil noceat... sed... prosit. Lips. tertius, non modo noceat religioni atque justitiae, sed etiam; ut non modo, pro non modo non, ut hinc inde et ad l. de Opif., cap. 19, in not. monui. Sed praefero hic reliquorum, non modo nihil, quod et ipsum elegans, ut l. VI, c. 20: Quia non modo... nihil conferunt, sed etiam nocent plurimum: in quibus expressit Ciceronem l. II, de Nat. deor., c. 36: Non modo nihil nocent terris, sed prosunt. Bun.

"Not only does no harm … but … is of benefit." Leipzig 3 has "not only harms religion and justice, but also," so that "non modo" stands for "non modo non," as I have noted here and there and in the notes on De opificio, chapter 19. But here I prefer the others' "not only nothing," which is itself elegant, as in book VI, chapter 20: "Because not only … they contribute nothing, but they even do very great harm," in which he reproduced Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods II, chapter 36: "Not only do they do no harm to the lands, but they benefit them." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sit in virtutibus instructior› · col 550

Sit in virtutibus instructior. Praepositionem in addidi ex 2 Bonon., 5 Reg. quorum duo sunt veterrimi, 6 Colb., Tax., 2 Clarom. et 3 editis.

"Be better furnished in virtues." I have added the preposition "in" from Bologna 2, Regius 5 (two of which are very old), Colbert 6, the Taxaquet manuscript, Clermont 2 and three editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Animae pabulum› · col 550

Animae pabulum. Lib. I, cap. 1: Nullus suavior animo cibus est, quam cognitio veritatis. Lib. III, cap. 5: Sic animae sapientia alimentum est. Cicero lib. V, de Fin. cap. 19: Animi cultus ille erat ei quasi quidam humanitatis cibus. Bun.

"The food of the soul." Book I, chapter 1: "No food is sweeter to the mind than the knowledge of truth." Book III, chapter 5: "So wisdom is the nourishment of the soul." Cicero, On Ends book V, chapter 19: "That cultivation of the mind was to him a kind of food of humanity." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non canimus› · col 550

Non canimus, etc. Proverbium ex Virg. Eclog. X.

"We do not sing," etc. A proverb from Virgil, Eclogue X.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nec enim in tam malo statu res est› · col 550

Nec enim in tam malo statu res est. In mss. 2 Bonon. est: Non enim. Nonnulli editi cum mss. 2 Reg. veterrimis, Marm., Goth. habent: Nec enim plus impuris spiritibus, quam sancto licet. Inutile additamentum. In quibusdam est iniquis, pro impuris. Ita opinatur Thomasius.

"For things are not in so bad a state." Bologna manuscript 2 has "Non enim." Some editions, with the two very old Regius 2 manuscripts, the Marmoutier and the Gotha, have: "For more is not permitted to impure spirits than to the holy one." A useless addition. In some it is "unjust" for "impure." So Thomasius thinks.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Circumlinatur› · col 550

Circumlinatur. Alludit ad Lucret. sententiam I, 30, qui de nutricibus ait, quod oras pocula circum contingunt mellis dulci flavoque liquore, ut puerorum aetas improvida ludificetur, deceptaque non capiatur. Rivetus.

"Be smeared round." He alludes to the thought of Lucretius I, 30, who says of nurses that they touch the cups round the rims with the sweet golden liquid of honey, so that the improvident age of children may be beguiled and, deceived, not be taken in. Rivet.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Coelesti melle sapientiae› · col 550

Coelesti melle sapientiae. Mss. 12 rec. et 9 excusi, coelestis.

"With the heavenly honey of wisdom." Twelve recent manuscripts and nine printed editions have "of heavenly (wisdom)."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Haerere animis› · col 550

Haerere animis. Mss. 6 et 8 impressi, inhaerere. — Haerere animis. Angl., Lips., Goth., Reimm., Ven., 1472, utraque 78, Parrh., Paris., Junt., Ald., Crat., Gymn. reliqui, inhaerere animis, ut l. VI, cap. 20. At Rast., Ven. 1493, 97, haerere. Bun.

"To cling to their minds." Six manuscripts and eight printed editions have "inhaerere." — "To cling to their minds." The English, Leipzig, Gotha and Reimmann manuscripts, Venice 1472, both of 1478, Parrhasius, Paris, Junta, Aldus, Cratander, Gymnicus and the rest have "inhaerere animis," as in book VI, chapter 20. But the Rostock edition and Venice 1493 and 97 have "haerere." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sono mulcet› · col 550

Sono mulcet. Haec lectio manuscriptorum est, permulcet editorum. Reg. Put. et ed. Rom. 1474, mulcent, mendose.

"Soothes with sound." This is the reading of the manuscripts; "permulcet" is that of the editions. The Regius-Puteanus manuscript and the Rome edition of 1474 have "mulcent," wrongly.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Adeo› · col 550

Adeo. Mss. Tornes., Em. et 4 excusi, Ideo.

"So much." The Tornaesius and Emmanuel manuscripts and four printed editions have "Ideo."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Incutere voluptatem› · col 550

Incutere voluptatem. Singularis hic est Ven. prima 1478 legendo, inducere voluptatem. Reliqui mei, incutere. Nam in re etiam blanda et suavi usurpatur hoc verbum, Lucret. I, 20. Omnibus incutiens blandum per pectora amorem. Sic Tertull. adv. Marcion. l. III, c. 20. Risum mihi incuties. Bun.

"To strike pleasure into." The first Venice edition of 1478 stands alone here in reading "to bring in pleasure." My others have "incutere." For this verb is used even of a pleasing and sweet thing, Lucretius I, 20: "Striking alluring love into the breasts of all." So Tertullian, Against Marcion book III, chapter 20: "You will strike laughter into me." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Plane sint eloquentes› · col 550

Plane sint eloquentes. Mss. 14 rec. et 6 edit., plene, (continues)

"Are fully eloquent." Fourteen recent manuscripts and six editions have "plene," (continues)

(printed under page 288)

Page

  • running head: 549 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT[...] (cut off at the right edge of the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹ceratis corporibus extorquent. Cum talibus›; B ‹que causam volui sapientiam cum Religione›; C ‹Exemplis multis ad Epitom.› (in the notes); D ‹rit, et poemati suo intexuerit.› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "ceratis" (rest of "eviscerated", broken from the previous column); "nunc" printed with damaged type that looks like "nnnc", and "quorum" looks like "qnorum": both set as words, treated as worn type, not misprints; full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" (cut off at the right edge) stands between the text block and the notes and is not set; the Variorum notes at the page foot (Evisceratis corporibus ... Non modo nihil noceat) are left for the later pass; no editors' matter in the text block.
  • other: Q4a: in the note "Haerere animis" the page prints "Rast." (set as printed; the English keeps the Rostock edition, Bünemann's "Rost."); "incuties" in the note "Incutere voluptatem" prints with worn type like "incnties", set as the word.
PL 6:550
Non canimus surdis.
we do not sing to the deaf.
Nec enim in tam malo statu res est, ut desint sanae mentes, quibus et veritas placeat, et monstratum sibi rectum iter et videant, et sequantur. Circumlinatur modo poculum coelesti melle sapientiae, ut possint ab imprudentibus amara remedia sine offensione potari; dum illiciens prima dulcedo acerbitatem saporis asperi, sub praetextu suavitatis occultat. Nam haec in primis causa est, cur apud sapientes, et doctos, et principes hujus saeculi Scriptura sancta fide careat, quod Prophetae communi ac simplici sermone, ut ad populum, sunt locuti. Contemnuntur itaque ab iis, qui nihil audire, vel legere, nisi expolitum ac disertum volunt; nec quidquam haerere animis eorum potest, nisi quod aures blandiori sono mulcet. Illa vero, quae sordida videntur, anilia, inepta, vulgaria existimantur. Adeo nihil verum putant, nisi quod auditu suave est; nihil credibile, nisi quod potest incutere voluptatem: nemo rem veritate ponderat, sed ornatu. Non credunt ergo divinis, quia fuco carent; sed ne illis quidem, qui ea interpretantur, quia sunt et ipsi, aut omnino rudes, aut certe parum docti. Nam ut plane sint eloquentes, perraro contingit; cujus rei causa in aperto est. Eloquentia enim saeculo servit; populo se jactare, et in rebus malis placere gestit: si quidem veritatem saepius expugnare conatur,
For things are not in so bad a state that there are no sound minds left, minds which both find the truth pleasing and, when the right path is shown to them, both see it and follow it. Let the cup only be smeared round with the heavenly honey of wisdom, so that the bitter remedies can be drunk by the unwary without offence, while the first sweetness, enticing them, conceals the sharpness of the harsh taste under the pretext of pleasantness. For this is above all the reason why among the wise, the learned and the princes of this age Holy Scripture lacks credit: that the Prophets spoke in common and simple language, as to the people. They are therefore despised by those who wish to hear or read nothing unless it is polished and eloquent; nor can anything cling to their minds unless it soothes the ears with a more alluring sound. But the things that seem mean are reckoned old wives' tales, foolish and vulgar. So far do they think nothing true unless it is sweet to the hearing, nothing credible unless it can strike them with pleasure: no one weighs a thing by its truth, but by its ornament. They therefore do not believe the divine writings, because these lack paint; nor even those who interpret them, because they too are either altogether unskilled or at any rate little learned. For it happens very rarely that they are fully eloquent; and the cause of this is plain to see. For eloquence serves the age; it longs to show itself off to the people and to please in evil matters, since indeed it quite often tries to overthrow the truth,
Editors' notes and page, col. 550

Page

  • running head: V. DE JUSTITIA. 550
  • marginal letters: A Non canimus surdis.; B quae sordida videntur; C Sit in virtutibus instructior (notes); D Coelesti melle sapientiae (notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "Scriptura sancta" and "simplici" look like "saneta" and "simpliei" in the scan, and "fide" looks like "lide". I took these as worn type or scan blur, but I am UNSURE. The VARIORUM NOTAE heading printed across both columns, between the text and the notes, is cut off at the left edge and is not set. The Variorum notae below it are not set (later pass). The column ends mid-sentence at "conatur,".
PL 6:551
ut vim suam monstret; opes expetit, honores concupiscit, summum denique gradum dignitatis exposcit. Ergo haec quasi humilia despicit, acarna tanquam contraria sibi fugit; quippe quae publico gaudeat, et multitudinem celebritatemque desideret. Eo fit, ut sapientia et veritas idoneis praeconibus indigeat. Et si qui forte litteratorum se ad eam contulerunt, defensioni ejus non suffecerunt.
so as to display its power; it seeks wealth, covets honours, and finally demands the highest degree of rank. Therefore it despises these things as lowly, and flees secret things as contrary to itself, inasmuch as it delights in what is public, and desires a crowd and renown. Hence it comes about that wisdom and truth lack fit heralds. And if perhaps any of the learned have betaken themselves to it, they have not been equal to its defence.
Ex iis, qui mihi noti sunt, Minucius Felix non ignobilis] inter causidicos locifuit. Hujus liber, cui Octavio titulus est, declarat, quam idoneus veritatis assertor esse potuisset, si se totum ad id studium contulisset. Septimius quoque Tertullianus fuit omni genere litterarum peritus: sed in eloquendo parum facilis, et minus comptus, et multum obscurus fuit. Ergo ne hic quidem satis celebritatis invenit. Unus igitur praecipuus, et clarus extitit Cyprianus, quoniam et magnam sibi gloriam ex artis oratoriae professione quaesierat, et admodum multa conscripsit in suo genere miranda. Erat enim ingenio facili, copioso, suavi, et (quae sermonis maxima est virtus) aperto, ut discernere nequeas, utrumne ornatior in eloquendo, an felicior in explicando, an potentior in persuadendo fuerit. Hic tamen placere ultra verba
Of those who are known to me, Minucius Felix held a not ignoble place among advocates. His book, which has the title Octavius, shows how fit an asserter of the truth he could have been, if he had devoted himself wholly to that pursuit. Septimius Tertullian too was skilled in every kind of letters, but in expression he was not very fluent, and rather unpolished, and very obscure. Therefore not even he found sufficient renown. Cyprian, then, alone stood out as pre-eminent and illustrious, since he had both won great glory for himself from the profession of the art of oratory, and wrote a great many things admirable in their kind. For he was of a ready, copious, pleasing and (what is the greatest virtue of speech) clear talent, so that you could not tell whether he was more ornate in expression, or more felicitous in explanation, or more powerful in persuasion. Yet to please, beyond words,
Editors' notes and page, col. 551

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters), plus one sub-note with call ᵃ to the note "Contulisset". Nothing runs over from p. 288 at the head of this page (the note "Plane sint eloquentes" on p. 288 appears to end there). -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Veritas idoneis praeconibus indigeat› · col 551

Veritas idoneis praeconibus indigeat. Mss. Tornes. et 1 Colbert. rec. praeconiis.

"Truth needs fit heralds." The Tornaesius manuscript and the recent Colbert 1 have "praeconiis" (proclamations).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Minucius Felix› · col 551

Minucius Felix. Elegantem ejus christianae religionis apologiam sub titulo Octavius habemus. Vixit anno aerae christianae 235, quo tempore vivebat et Tertullianus. Jam hujus facta est mentio supra lib. I, cap. 11, post medium.

"Minucius Felix." We have his elegant apology for the Christian religion under the title Octavius. He lived in the year 235 of the Christian era, at which time Tertullian also was living. He has already been mentioned above, book I, chapter 11, after the middle.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Tertullianus› · col 551

Tertullianus. Satis notus scriptis editis. Omni genere doctrinae fuit refertus. Ejus opera graece ab ipso scripta extant in Regia Hispaniarum Scorialensi Bibliotheca, ut a Rege Catholico Philippo V didicerat Marchio de Santa Cruz de Marzenado, vir usquequaque, et probitate, et scientia ornatus. Mirum est haec in utraque lingua hucusque non fuisse edita. Tertullianum vero tanti faciebat S. Cyprianus, ut nullum praetermitteret diem sine ejus lectione; atque teste S. Hieronymo, solitus erat dicere sanctus episcopus: « Da mihi magistrum, » Tertullianum significans. De hoc infra capite 4 aliquid adhuc dicetur.

"Tertullian." Well enough known by his published writings. He was stocked with every kind of learning. Works of his written by himself in Greek survive in the Royal Escorial Library of the Spains, as the Marquis de Santa Cruz de Marzenado, a man adorned in every respect with both integrity and learning, had learned from the Catholic King Philip V. It is remarkable that these have not been published in either language up to now. Saint Cyprian thought so highly of Tertullian that he let no day pass without reading him; and, on Saint Jerome's testimony, the holy bishop used to say, "Give me the master," meaning Tertullian. Something more will be said of him below in chapter 4.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quoniam et magnam› · col 551

Quoniam et magnam. mss. 1 Reg. rec. et Brun., maximam: pro quoniam, legitur qui in tribus rec. et 6 editis.

"Since both great." The recent Regius 1 and the Brunswick manuscript have "greatest"; for "since," "who" is read in three recent manuscripts and six editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quaesierat› · col 551

Quaesierat. Pro acquisierat; simplex pro composito passim apud Lactantium. Vide lib. de Mortibus persecutorum.

"He had sought." For "he had acquired"; the simple verb for the compound is frequent in Lactantius. See the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors.

(lemma) ‹anchor: An felicior› · col 551

An felicior. Sic mss. antiquissimi 1 Bon., 2 Reg., 1 al. item Reg. rec. sed bonae notae, 1 Colb., Rohan., Ultr., Brun. At recentiores, etiam Sangerman., cum impressis habent facilior: utraque lectio bona; mox enim praecessit ingenio facili, etc.

"Or more happy." So the very ancient manuscripts Bologna 1 and Regius 2, another, likewise a recent Regius but of good quality, Colbert 1, the Rohan, the Utrecht and the Brunswick. But the more recent ones, including the Saint-Germain, have with the printed editions "facilior" (more easy): both readings are good, for "of easy talent," etc., came just before.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Coprianum› · col 551, runs into col 552

Coprianum. Quasi dicas Stercorarium, aut, si mavis, Scurram, aut foeda et vilia loquentem. mss. Vict. et 1 Colb. Ciprianum, male ad Lactantii mentem; nec melius manuscripti rec. 1 Reg., Tornes. et 1 Colb. Caprianum. Cavillum est ex allusione κοπρία, stercus. Scurrae copriae dicebantur. Gall. — Rhetores, sycophantae, rabulae, scurrae, et hujuscemodi multitudo eorum, qui magna ac multa promittunt ac minantur, miraque de se praedicant, κοπρολόγοι et κοπρίαι vulgo appellati. Copriae, οἱ κοπρίαι, apud Sueton. in Tiberio cap. 61, scurrae sunt, qui ridiculi gratia vana ac multa de se jactabant, et pollicebantur: unde et verbum incopriare, pro, circulatorem agere, et fumos vendere, quod et fumare dicebant, ut Graeci καπνίζειν. Glossae Isidori: Scurra, qui incopriat; in aliis glossis: Scurra qui fumat. Idem Isid.: Circulator, qui fumat: sic nugatores, mendaces et vaniloquos, coprias vocabant. Ita Cyprianum olim Gentiles quidam Coprianum, una littera mutata, appellarunt, quod aniles (ut ipsi volebant) fabulas, et multa mendacia scriptis suis inseruisset. Salmasius. — Vide etiam Casaubonum ad Suetonium in Tiberio, et Lipsium Electorum lib. II, cap. 17. De S. Cypriano ait Hieronymus, superfluum esse hujus librorum catalogum contexere, cum sole clariora sint ejus opera. Ejus laudes non Latini modo, verum etiam Graeci cecinerunt, ut Nazianzenus. De Cypriani eloquentia lege Prudentium, S. Augustin. lib. IV, de Doctrina christiana, et Hieronymum in epistola ad Paulinum.

"Coprianus." As if you said "the dung-man," or, if you prefer, "the buffoon," or one who speaks foul and vile things. The Victorine manuscript and Colbert 1 have "Ciprianum," wrongly as to Lactantius's meaning; nor are the recent manuscripts Regius 1, Tornaesius and Colbert 1 better with "Caprianum." It is a jibe by allusion to κοπρία, dung. Buffoons were called "copriae." Gallaeus. — Rhetoricians, sycophants, pettifoggers, buffoons and the whole crowd of that kind who promise and threaten great and many things and proclaim wonders of themselves were commonly called κοπρολόγοι and κοπρίαι. "Copriae," οἱ κοπρίαι, in Suetonius, Tiberius chapter 61, are buffoons who for the sake of a laugh boasted and promised many empty things about themselves; hence also the verb "incopriare," meaning to play the mountebank and to sell smoke, which they also called "fumare," as the Greeks say καπνίζειν. The Glosses of Isidore: "Buffoon: one who incopriates"; in other glosses: "Buffoon: one who sells smoke." Isidore again: "Mountebank: one who sells smoke." So they called triflers, liars and idle talkers "copriae." Thus some Gentiles once called Cyprian "Coprianus," by changing one letter, because (as they would have it) he had put old wives' tales and many lies into his writings. Salmasius. — See also Casaubon on Suetonius's Tiberius, and Lipsius, Electa book II, chapter 17. Of Saint Cyprian Jerome says it is superfluous to compile a catalogue of his books, since his works are clearer than the sun. Not only Latins but Greeks too sang his praises, such as Nazianzen. On Cyprian's eloquence read Prudentius, Saint Augustine, On Christian Doctrine book IV, and Jerome in the letter to Paulinus.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Qui› · col 552

Qui. Sic ms. Cantab. et quatuor editi: multi alii, quod.

"Who." So the Cambridge manuscript and four editions; many others, "which."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Contulisset› · col 552

Contulisset. Post hoc verbum, sequentem hanc orationem in ms. Bon. antiq. invenisse se testatur Isaeus: Unde apparet, disertissimo et doctissimo viro, quantum ad sacrilegos attinet refellendos, non facultatem ᵃ dicendi, sed consilium defuisse, in eo praecipue quod Demetrianum veritatis expertem, non ratione prudentiae mundanae, qua uti in principio debuit, sed auctoritate coelestium praeceptorum, quorum ille se hostem fatebatur, astrinxit.

"He had brought together." After this word Isaeus attests that he found the following sentence in the ancient Bologna manuscript: "From this it is clear that what that most eloquent and learned man lacked, so far as refuting the sacrilegious is concerned, was not the ability ᵃ to speak but judgement, especially in that he bound Demetrianus, who had no share in the truth, not by the reasoning of worldly prudence, which he ought to have used at the start, but by the authority of the heavenly precepts, of which that man professed himself the enemy."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Apud nos› · col 552

Apud nos. Sic reposui ex edit. Tornes. et Soubron. ac mss. omnibus, praeter I Reg. rec. in quo, sicut in vulgatis, est nostros.

"Among us." So I have restored from the Tornaesius and Soubron editions and all the manuscripts, except the recent Regius 1, in which, as in the common editions, it is "our men."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Lacessierunt› · col 552

Lacessierunt. Suavius nobis exhibent 2 vet. edit. Rom. et omnes ferme mss. quam caeteri vulgati et 5 rec. mss., lacesserunt. Hoc ultimum erratum est juxta linguam latinam.

"They provoked." The two old Rome editions and almost all the manuscripts give it to us more pleasingly than the other common editions and five recent manuscripts, which have "lacesserunt." This last is an error by the Latin language.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Oratorias litteras› · col 552

Oratorias, litteras, etc. Nicomediae videlicet. Docuit ibi Oratoriam, ut [etiam Hieronymus in ejus vita retulit, Latinam in Graecia, fortassis quia tum quoque temporis romani suam linguam per orbem romanum propagatam voluerunt: sed fortassis frustra; destituebatur enim auditoribus. Bithynia, Asiae minoris provincia, e regione Constantinopoleos, ad Pontum Euxinum. Hanc populo romano rex Nicomedes testamento reliquerat. Natolia hodie haec provincia vocatur.

"Oratorical letters," etc. At Nicomedia, that is. He taught oratory there, as Jerome also relates in his life, Latin oratory in Greece, perhaps because at that time too the Romans wanted their language spread through the Roman world; but perhaps in vain, for he lacked hearers. Bithynia is a province of Asia Minor, opposite Constantinople, on the Euxine Sea. King Nicomedes had left it to the Roman people by will. Today this province is called Anatolia.

ᵃ ‹anchor: non facultatem› · sub-note to "Contulisset", col 552 In MS. est discendi. Hanc orationem non habent nec Rohan. nec Sangerm. nec etiam alii.

In the manuscript it is "discendi" (of learning). Neither the Rohan nor the Saint-Germain manuscript, nor others, have this sentence.

(printed under page 289)

Page

  • running head: 551 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ut vim suam monstret; B fuit. Ergo ne hic quidem; C 11, post medium. (in the Variorum notae); D An felicior. Sic mss. (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-sentence at "ultra verba"; the heading VARIORUM NOTAE runs across both columns and is cut off at the image edge, not set; the Variorum notae at the page foot (Veritas idoneis ... to ... ut Graeci) are left for the later pass; the column number in the head is slightly damaged but reads 551
  • misprints kept as printed (Q4a): "acarna" (for arcana); "ignobilis]" (stray bracket); "locifuit" (closed up, for loci fuit); in the note "Oratorias, litteras" the stray bracket "[etiam" is set as printed.
PL 6:552
sacramentum ignorantibus non potest, quoniam mystica sunt, quae locutus est, et ad id praeparata, ut a solis fidelibus audiantur. Denique a doctis hujus saeculi, quibus forte scripta ejus innotuerunt, derideri solet. Audivi ego quemdam hominem sane disertum, qui cum immutata una littera Coprianum vocaret; quasi qui elegans ingenium, et melioribus rebus aptum, ad aniles fabulas contulisset. Quod si accidit hoc ei, cujus eloquentia non insuavis est, quid tandem putemus eis accidere, quorum sermo jejnnus est et ingratus; qui neque vim persuadendi, neque subtilitatem argumentandi, neque ullam prorsus acerbitatem ad revincendum habere potuerunt?
those ignorant of the mystery he is not able, since the things he spoke are mystical, and prepared to this end, that they may be heard by the faithful alone. In short, he is commonly derided by the learned of this age, to whom his writings have perhaps become known. I myself heard a certain man, truly eloquent, who, with one letter changed, called him Coprianus, as if he had applied an elegant talent, and one fitted for better things, to old wives' tales. But if this happened to him, whose eloquence is not unpleasing, what then are we to think happens to those whose speech is meagre and unattractive; who have been able to possess neither the power of persuading, nor subtlety in arguing, nor any sharpness at all for refuting?
CAPUT II.
Chapter II.
Quantum a temerariis hominibus impugnata fuit veritas christiana.
How greatly Christian truth was assailed by rash men.
Ergo quia defuerunt apud nos idonei peritique doctores, qui vehementer, qui acriter errores publicos redarguerent, qui causam omnem veritatis ornate copioseque defenderent: provocavit quosdam haec ipsa penuria, ut auderent scribere contra ignotam sibi veritatem. Omitto eos, qui prioribus eam temporibus nequicquam lacessierunt. Ego cum in Bithynia oratorias litteras accitus docerem, contigissetque
Therefore, because there have been lacking among us suitable and skilled teachers who would vehemently, who would sharply refute public errors, who would defend the whole cause of truth ornately and copiously, this very dearth provoked certain men to dare to write against a truth unknown to them. I pass over those who in earlier times assailed it to no purpose. When I, having been summoned to Bithynia, was teaching the oratorical arts, and it had come about
Editors' notes and page, col. 552

Page

  • running head: [L]ACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. (first letter cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹sacramentum ignorantibus non potest›; B ‹Quantum a temerariis hominibus›; C ‹dacia scriptis suis inseruisset› (in the notes); D ‹tur, astrinxit› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the word contigissetque was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 553
PL 6:553
ut eodem tempore Dei templum everteretur: duo extiterunt ibidem, qui jacenti atque abjectae veritati, nescio utrum superbius, an importunius insultarent; quorum alter antistitem se philosophiae profitebatur: verum ita vitiosus, ut continentiae magister, non minus avaritia, quam libidinibus arderet, in victu tam sumptuosus, ut in schola virtutis assertor, parcimoniae paupertatisque laudator, in palatio pejus coenaret, quam domi. Tamen vitia sua capillis et pallio, et (quod maximum est velamentum) divitiis praetegebat; quas ut augeret, ad amicitias judicum miro ambitu penetrabat, eosque sibi repente auctoritate falsi nominis obligabat; non modo ut eorum sententias venderet, verum etiam ut confines suos, quos sedibus agrisque pellebat, a suo repetendo hac potentia retardaret. Hic vero, qui suas disputationes moribus destruebat, vel mores suos disputationibus arguebat, ipse adversus se gravis censor, et accusator acerrimus, eodem ipso tempore, quo justus populus nefarie lacerabatur, tres libros evomuit contra Religionem nomenque christianum: professus ante omnia philosophi officium esse erroribus hominum subvenire, atque illos ad veram viam revocare; id est, ad cultus deorum, quorum numine ac majestate (ut ille dicebat) mundus gubernetur, nec pati homines imperitos quorumdam fraudibus
that at the same time the temple of God was being overthrown, there arose in that very place two men who insulted the truth as it lay prostrate and cast down, I know not whether more arrogantly or more unseasonably; of whom one professed himself a high priest of philosophy: but he was so vicious that, though a master of continence, he burned no less with avarice than with lusts; in his manner of living so extravagant that, while in the school he was a champion of virtue and a praiser of thrift and poverty, in the palace he dined worse than at home. Yet he cloaked his vices with his hair and his cloak, and (what is the greatest covering) with riches; and to increase these he made his way with wonderful canvassing into the friendship of judges, and suddenly bound them to himself by the authority of a false name; not only that he might sell their verdicts, but also that by this power he might hinder his neighbours, whom he was driving from their homes and lands, from reclaiming their own. This man indeed, who destroyed his disputations by his morals, or convicted his morals by his disputations, himself a severe censor against himself and a most bitter accuser, at the very same time at which a righteous people was being wickedly torn to pieces, vomited forth three books against the Religion and the Christian name: professing before all things that it is the office of a philosopher to remedy the errors of men and to call them back to the true way; that is, to the worship of the gods, by whose divine power and majesty (as he said) the world is governed, and not to allow inexperienced men, by the frauds of certain men,
Editors' notes and page, col. 553

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). The signature line "PATROL. VI." and page-signature "18" are printer's marks, not notes. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Dei templum› · col 553

Dei templum. Hic innuere videtur Lactantius Diocletianam persecutionem anno 302, quo circiter tempore Nicomediam a Diocletiano Lactantius accitus fuit, ut oratoriam artem doceret, teste Hieronymo. De hujus templi instauratione agit Lactantius initio libri de Mort. persecutorum, his verbis: Profligata nuper Ecclesia rursum exurgit, et majore gloria templum Dei, quod ab impiis fuerat eversum, misericordia Domini fabricatur.

"The temple of God." Here Lactantius seems to point to the Diocletianic persecution in the year 302, about which time Lactantius had been summoned to Nicomedia by Diocletian to teach the art of oratory, on Jerome's testimony. Lactantius treats of the rebuilding of this temple at the beginning of the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors, in these words: "The Church, lately struck down, rises again, and the temple of God, which had been overthrown by the impious, is built with greater glory by the mercy of the Lord."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quorum alter antistitem se philosophiae profitebatur› · col 553

Quorum alter antistitem se philosophiae profitebatur, etc. Mirum cur nomina suppresserit. Hinc perpende quam parum odiosus esset in hostes, quorum nominibus parcit. Nec opus est curiosa inquisitione in re, quam auctor noster celatam voluit. Ex Betul. — Hunc tamen existimant fuisse Maximum philosophum, quem Nicomediae audierat Julianus dictus Apostata. Iste philosophus Ephesius erat, qui veluti artes magicas exercens interfectus est. Hic ab aliis, non Maximus, sed Porphyrius a Lactantio indigitari creditur. Porphyrius enim, juxta Suidam, ab Aureliani tempore ad Diocletianum usque vixit: at nemo nescit quanta fureret in Christianos crudelitate. Verum probat Holstenius in Vitae Porphyrii cap. 3, ac ultimo, hunc philosophum non fuisse Porphyrium. Idem Baelius in suo Dictionario historico, verbo Hierocles.

"One of whom professed himself a high priest of philosophy," etc. It is remarkable that he suppressed the names. Weigh from this how little rancour he bore towards his enemies, whose names he spares. Nor is a curious inquiry needed into a matter our author wished kept hidden. From Betuleius. — Some nevertheless think this was Maximus the philosopher, whom Julian, called the Apostate, had heard at Nicomedia. This philosopher was an Ephesian, who was put to death as one practising magic arts. Others believe that not Maximus but Porphyry is pointed at by Lactantius. For Porphyry, according to the Suda, lived from the time of Aurelian up to Diocletian; and no one is unaware with what cruelty he raged against the Christians. But Holstenius proves, in his Life of Porphyry, chapter 3 and the last, that this philosopher was not Porphyry. So too Bayle in his Historical Dictionary, under the word "Hierocles."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Vitia sua capillis› · col 553, runs into col 554

Vitia sua capillis, etc. Mos erat philosophis barbam alere, quam ideo sapientem poeta vocavit: Horat. II, Serm. 3. Tempore quo me Solatus jussit sapientem pascere barbam. Hinc philosophi saepe barbati magistri dicebantur. Hinc Persius Satyr. 4: Barbatum haec crede magistrum Dicere, sorbitio tollit quem dira cicutae. Barbam alebant eo quod aliquam sibi majestatem ea conciliari arbitrarentur. Diogenes rogatus cur tam magnam nutriret barbam: Ut eam videns, inquit, et tangens, virum me esse meminerim. Unde et homines sanctitatem barba affectabant, quemadmodum hic philosophus de quo Lact. hoc loco. Vide eumdem Lact., de Ira Dei, cap. 22.

"His vices with his hair," etc. It was the custom of philosophers to grow a beard, which the poet therefore called wise: Horace, Satires II, 3: "At the time when he consoled me and bade me grow a wise man's beard." Hence philosophers were often called bearded masters. Hence Persius, Satire 4: "Believe that the bearded master says this, he whom the dread draught of hemlock carries off." They grew the beard because they thought it won them some majesty. Diogenes, asked why he grew so great a beard, said: "So that, seeing it and touching it, I may remember that I am a man." Hence men also affected sanctity with a beard, like this philosopher of whom Lactantius speaks in this place. See Lactantius again, On the Anger of God, chapter 22.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quos sedibus agrisque pellebat› · col 554

Quos sedibus agrisque pellebat. In mss. 5 rec. et editis 7 est aedibus, omissa prima littera, quae eadem est ultima prioris vocabuli, fortasse per incuriam librarii.

"Whom he was driving from their homes and fields." In five recent manuscripts and seven editions it is "aedibus" (houses), the first letter being dropped, which is the same as the last of the preceding word, perhaps through the copyist's carelessness.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Resanescant› · col 554

Resanescant. Sic Lactantius lib. IV, cap. 20, initio, resanaret; et infra hujusce lib. V, cap. 22, in fine, resanati. Quae verba vix apud ullos auctores latinos reperies.

"Be healed again." So Lactantius, book IV, chapter 20, at the beginning, "resanaret"; and below in this book V, chapter 22, at the end, "resanati." You will hardly find these words in any Latin authors.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Neu saevas› · col 554

Neu saevas. Mss. 9 rec., et 6 typis excusi, nec.

"Nor cruel." Nine recent manuscripts and six printed editions have "nec."

(lemma) ‹anchor: In caeteris rebus› · col 554

In caeteris rebus. Mss. octo et editi addunt humanis, quod respuunt multi potiores et antiquiores scripti et ed. Rom. 1474.

"In other matters." Eight manuscripts and the editions add "human," which many better and older manuscripts and the Rome edition of 1474 reject.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Humanis› · col 554

Humanis. Haec vox abest a pluribus mss.

"Human." This word is absent from several manuscripts.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et anili superstitione› · col 554

Et anili superstitione. Proprium epithetum, pro extrema superstitione, quia muliebris sexus est ad superstitionem propensior; unde mulieres τὰς δεισιδαιμονίας ἀρχηγοὺς dicebat Strabo, lib. VII. Sane ad sexus infirmitatem et levitatem, aetatis quoque imbecillitas accedit. Heraldus.

"And old-womanish superstition." A fitting epithet, for extreme superstition, because the female sex is more inclined to superstition; hence Strabo, book VII, called women "the leaders of superstitions." Indeed, to the weakness and fickleness of the sex the feebleness of age is added. Hérauld.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Vanus› · col 554

Vanus. Mss. 1 Colb. a prima manu, Cotton. et 1 Clarom. varius.

"Empty." Colbert 1 in the first hand, the Cotton and Clermont 1 have "varius" (fickle).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Conticerent› · col 554

Conticerent. Ita mss. Anglican. et 11 alii, atque meliores editiones, annor. 1476 et 1497, atque Tornes. et Soubr., Conniverent, in quibusdam aliis. ms. 1 Reg. rec. coniberent; 1 Lips., 1 Colb. cohiberent; Ultr., 1 Brun., cohiberentur; 1 Colb., convenirent; 4 mss. et totidem editi conticescerent; 1 Bon. rec. conticesceret; 1 Reg. antiq., congrueret; 1 Bon. antiq., Nam si quis nostrorum affuisset.... conniveret.... derideret.

"They kept silent." So the English manuscript and eleven others, and the better editions, of the years 1476 and 1497, and the Tornaesius and Soubron; "conniverent" (they shut their eyes) in some others. The recent Regius 1 has "coniberent"; Leipzig 1 and Colbert 1, "cohiberent"; the Utrecht and Brunswick 1, "cohiberentur"; Colbert 1, "convenirent"; four manuscripts and as many editions, "conticescerent"; the recent Bologna 1, "conticesceret"; the ancient Regius 1, "congrueret"; the ancient Bologna 1, "For if any of ours had been present … he shut his eyes … he laughed."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Eruditurum alios ad veritatem› · col 554

Eruditurum alios ad veritatem. Eadem locutione utitur Lactant. lib. III, c. 11, et c. 27; lib. V, cap. 2 et 11; lib. VI, cap. 2; lib. VII, c. 14; lib. de Ira Dei, cap. 23.

"That he would instruct others unto the truth." Lactantius uses the same expression in book III, chapters 11 and 27; book V, chapters 2 and 11; book VI, chapter 2; book VII, chapter 14; On the Anger of God, chapter 23.

(printed under page 290)

Page

  • running head: 553 LIBER V. DE JUSTI (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹gissetque ut eodem tempore›; B ‹tendo hac potentia retardaret›; C ‹cletianam persecutionem anno 302› (in the Variorum notae); D ‹liani tempore ad Diocletianum› (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "se philosophiae": the scan looks like "sc", probably a blurred e, so it is set as se (the note below quotes "se"); "confines" and "pellebat" are read through blurred type; the column ends mid-word "frau-" (fraudibus); the heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" at the page foot, cut off at the image edge, is not set; the Variorum notae (Dei templum; Quorum alter antistitem; Vitia sua capillis) are not set, as they belong to the later pass; the page-foot signature "PATROL. VI." is omitted
PL 6:554
illici, ne simplicitas eorum praedae ac pabulo sit hominibus astutis.
to be lured, lest their simplicity become prey and fodder for crafty men.
Itaque se suscepisse hoc munus philosophia dignum, ut praeferret non videntibus lumen sapientiae, non modo ut susceptis deorum cultibus resanescant, sed etiam ut, pertinaci obstinatione deposita, corporis cruciamenta devitent, neu saevas membrorum lacerationes frustra perpeti velint. Ut autem appareret cujus rei gratia opus illud elaborasset, effusus est in principum laudes; quorum pietas et providentia (ut quidem ipse dicebat) cum in caeteris rebus, tum praecipue in defendendis deorum religionibus claruisset: consultum esse tandem rebus humanis, ut cohibita impia et anili superstitione, universi homines legitimis sacris vacarent, ac propitios sibi deos experirentur. Ubi autem religionis ejus, contra quam perorabat, infirmare voluit rationem, ineptus, vanus, ridiculus apparuit; quia gravis ille consultor utilitatis alienae, non modo quid oppugnaret, sed etiam quid loqueretur nesciebat. Nam si qui nostrorum affuerunt, quamvis temporis gratia conticerent, animo tamen derisere, utpote cum viderent hominem profitentem se illuminaturum alios, cum ipse caecus esset; reducturum alios ab errore, cum ipse ignoraret ubi pedes suos poneret; eruditurum alios ad veritatem, cujus ille ne scintillam quidem unam vidisset
Therefore, he said, he had undertaken this task, worthy of philosophy, of holding out the light of wisdom to those who do not see, not only so that, having taken up the worship of the gods, they might return to sanity, but also so that, having laid aside their stubborn obstinacy, they might escape the tortures of the body and not wish to endure the savage lacerations of their limbs to no purpose. And so that it might be apparent for what purpose he had laboured over that work, he poured himself out in praises of the princes, whose piety and providence (as he indeed said) had shone forth both in other matters and especially in defending the religions of the gods: that at last provision had been made for human affairs, so that, the impious and old-womanish superstition having been restrained, all men might devote themselves to lawful rites and find the gods propitious to them. But when he wished to weaken the reasoning of that religion against which he was declaiming, he appeared inept, empty, ridiculous; because that weighty counsellor of another's advantage did not know what he was attacking, nor even what he was saying. For if any of our people were present, although they kept silent because of the times, yet in their minds they laughed him to scorn, inasmuch as they saw a man professing that he would enlighten others when he himself was blind; that he would lead others back from error when he himself did not know where to set his feet; that he would instruct others towards the truth, of which he had not seen even a single spark
Editors' notes and page, col. 554

Page

  • running head: R V. DE JUSTITIA. 554 (left part of the running head, presumably LIBE-, cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A dibus illici, ne simplicitas; B experirentur. Ubi autem; C sanctitatem barba affectabant (in the Variorum notae); D perstitionem propensior (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "dibus", completing "frau-" at the foot of the preceding column (fraudibus); last word "vi-" broken across the column break (presumably viderat). "philosophia dignum" set as printed (other editions may read philosopho); UNSURE whether a misprint. "ipse caecus" has slightly disturbed type in "ipse" but reads clearly. The VARIORUM NOTAE at the page foot (heading full width, cut off at left) not set: later pass.
PL 6:555
aliquando, quippe cum sapientiae professor, profligare sapientiam niteretur. Omnes tamen id arguebant quod illo potissimum tempore id operis esset aggressus, quo furebat odiosa crudelitas. O philosophum adulatorem, ac tempori servientem! Verum hic pro sua vanitate contemptus est; qui et gratiam, quam speravit, non est adeptus, et gloria quam captavit, in culpam reprehensionemque conversa est.
at any time, inasmuch as, though a professor of wisdom, he was striving to overthrow wisdom. Yet all found fault with this, that he had undertaken that piece of work at that time above all, when hateful cruelty was raging. O flattering philosopher, and slave to the times! But this man for his vanity was held in contempt; he both failed to obtain the favour he had hoped for, and the glory he had grasped at was turned into blame and censure.
Alius eamdem materiam mordacius scripsit, qui erat tum e numero judicum, et qui auctor in primis faciendae persecutionis fuit: quo scelere non contentus, etiam scriptis eos, quos afflixerat, insecutus est. Composuit enim libellos duos, non contra Christianos, ne inimice insectari videretur, sed ad Christianos, ut humane ac benigne consulere putaretur. in quibus ita falsitatem Scripturae sacrae arguere conatus est, tanquam sibi esset tota contraria; nam quaedam capita, quae repugnare sibi videbantur, exposuit, adeo multa, adeo intima enumerans, ut aliquando ex eadem disciplina fuisse videatur. Quod si fuit, quis eum Demosthenes poterit ab impietate defendere? qui religionis cui fuerat assensus, et fidei cujus nomen induerat et sacramenti quod acceperat, proditor factus est? nisi forte casu in manus ejus
Another wrote on the same subject more bitingly, who was then of the number of the judges, and who was foremost among the authors of carrying out the persecution: not content with this crime, he pursued with his writings too those whom he had afflicted. For he composed two little books, not against the Christians, lest he should seem to be attacking them in a hostile way, but to the Christians, so that he might be thought to be counselling them humanely and kindly. In these he tried to convict Sacred Scripture of falsehood, as though it were wholly contrary to itself; for he set out certain heads which seemed to be in conflict with one another, enumerating so many things, and things so intimate, that he seems at some time to have been of the same school. And if he was, what Demosthenes will be able to defend him from the charge of impiety? He who became the betrayer of the religion to which he had given his assent, and of the faith whose name he had put on, and of the sacrament which he had received? Unless perhaps by chance into his hands
Editors' notes and page, col. 555

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quo furebat odiosa crudelitas› · col 555

Quo furebat odiosa crudelitas. Intelligit tempus persecutionum sub imperatoribus. Hinc colligi potest Lactantium post haec tempora scripsisse.

"In which hateful cruelty was raging." He means the time of the persecutions under the emperors. From this it can be gathered that Lactantius wrote after these times.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Pro sua vanitate› · col 555

Pro sua vanitate. Sic ms. Goth. et edit. 1476 et Gymnic. aliae inanitate.

"In keeping with his vanity." So the Gotha manuscript and the editions of 1476 and Gymnicus; others "inanitate" (emptiness).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Alius eamdem materiam scripsit› · col 555

Alius eamdem materiam scripsit. Pro de eadem materia Lactantius noster non semel quarto casu gaudet pro sexto.

"Another wrote the same matter." For "on the same matter": our Lactantius more than once likes the accusative in place of the ablative.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Mordacius› · col 555

Mordacius. Singularis hic est Veneta 1471 legens, moderatius. Conf. infra: Ut humane ac benigne consuluisse putaretur. Bun.

"More bitingly." The Venice edition of 1471 stands alone here in reading "more moderately." Compare below: "so that he might be thought to have counselled humanely and kindly." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Alius eamdem materiam mordacius scripsit› · col 555

Alius eamdem materiam mordacius scripsit. Fuit iste Hierocles, quem libros suos, quos contra Christianos scripsit; φιλαληθής, id est amatoris veritatis titulo praenotasse scribit Eusebius, qui et illos egregio refutavit commentario. Isaeus. — Hierocles eodem tempore vixit quo Lactanctius, scilicet initio quarti post Christum natum saeculi. Hierocles propter animum in Christianis persequendis ita Diocletiano placuit, ut putent eruditi quidam, ex judice Nicomediensi, praefectum factum fuisse Alexandrinum; de quo vide librum de Mortib. persecut., c. 16. Epiphanius de ejus saevitia agit haeresi 68, atque ob id male audiebat Hierocles.

"Another wrote the same matter more bitingly." This was Hierocles, who, Eusebius writes, headed the books he wrote against the Christians with the title Philalethes, that is, "lover of truth"; Eusebius also refuted them in an excellent commentary. Isaeus. — Hierocles lived at the same time as Lactantius, namely at the beginning of the fourth century after the birth of Christ. Hierocles so pleased Diocletian by his zeal in persecuting Christians that some learned men think he was made prefect of Alexandria after being a judge at Nicomedia; on him see the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors, chapter 16. Epiphanius treats of his cruelty in heresy 68, and Hierocles was ill spoken of for it.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Qui erat tum e numero judicum› · col 555

Qui erat tum e numero judicum. Exercebat enim eo tempore praefecturam Augustalem Alexandriae, ut tradit Epiphanius, Haeres. 68. Isaeus.

"Who was then one of the judges." For at that time he held the Augustal prefecture of Alexandria, as Epiphanius relates, Heresy 68. Isaeus.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Demosthenes› · col 555

Demosthenes. Antonomasia, pro summo oratore: sicut paulo post Aristophanes pro vano poeta, et Aristarchus pro homine valde litterato, qui eruditionis alienae censor et ὀβελίζων proverbio celebratur. Quid quod etiam Aristophanis lucerna, propter summam diligentiam, in proverbium abiit. Intelligit ergo Lactantius litteratos quidem homines, sed profanos, et ad capienda Dei mysteria parum idoneos. Betuleius.

"Demosthenes." Antonomasia, for a supreme orator; just as a little later Aristophanes stands for an empty poet, and Aristarchus for a very lettered man, who is celebrated in the proverb as the censor of others' learning and as "the one who marks with the obelus." What is more, even the lamp of Aristophanes passed into a proverb because of his extreme diligence. So Lactantius means men who were lettered indeed but profane, and little fit to grasp the mysteries of God. Betuleius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Assensus› · col 555, runs into col 556

Assensus. Sic est emendandum, juxta mss. Rohanneum, et Sangermanense, non vero, ut correxerat Joan. Bapt. le Brun, qui legebat accensus. Hic Lactantius indicat Hieroclem suscepisse fidem, quam postea ejuraverat, quod recte exprimitur per verbum assensus, religioni scilicet. At minus propric diceretur accensus fidei. Atque optime dicitur assentiri religioni aut fidei. En tamen qualis est nota J. Bapt. le Brun, quam merito improbamus.— « Sic accensus emendavi ex quamplurimis mss. inter quos sunt vetustissimi duo Regii, et Cauc. In 7 rec. et 15. vulgatis legitur assensus, corrupte; in rec. 1 Colb. et 2 Lips. ascensus. Sed optime accensus, adscriptus, ab accenseo. Quae vox notat ministrum magistratus, aut eum qui subrogatur in locum defuncti militis, vel qui legioni jam integrae superadditus est. Vide Vegetium de Re militari, lib. II, cap. 19. » — In eadem voce accensus, sic habet. Buneman. — Accensus. Editi ab 1465, 1685, omnes, etiam Rost. (licet aliter Heumannus scribat) assensus. At accensus ex membranis primus restituit Jan. Gulielm. ad Plaut. in Menaechm.. Quaest. c. 4, atque ita Goth., Lips. 1 Emman., Cauc. et Ultr. Conf. Lact. lib. II, cap. 9, Accensetur. Mox ibid. Adscribitur. Bun.

"Assented." So it must be corrected, following the Rohan and Saint-Germain manuscripts, and not as Jean-Baptiste Le Brun had corrected it, who read "accensus." Here Lactantius indicates that Hierocles had embraced the faith, which he afterwards forswore, and this is rightly expressed by the word "assensus," namely to the religion. But "accensus to the faith" would be said less properly; whereas "to assent to religion or to faith" is said very well. Here nevertheless is Jean-Baptiste Le Brun's note, which we rightly disapprove: "So I have corrected to 'accensus' from very many manuscripts, among which are the two very old Regii and the Cauci. In seven recent manuscripts and fifteen common editions 'assensus' is read, corruptly; in the recent Colbert 1 and Leipzig 2, 'ascensus.' But 'accensus,' enrolled, from 'accenseo,' is best. This word denotes an attendant of a magistrate, or one who is substituted in the place of a dead soldier, or one added to a legion already complete. See Vegetius, On Military Matters book II, chapter 19." — On the same word "accensus," Bünemann has this. — "Accensus." The editions from 1465 to 1685, all of them, even the Rostock (though Heumann writes otherwise), have "assensus." But Jan Gulielmius first restored "accensus" from parchments, on Plautus's Menaechmi, Quaestiones chapter 4, and so the Gotha, Leipzig, Emmanuel 1, Cauci and Utrecht. Compare Lactantius book II, chapter 9, "accensetur"; soon after in the same place, "adscribitur." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Abfuit a fide et veritate› · col 556

Abfuit a fide et veritate. Ex omnibus mss. et pluribus editis addidi a fide, quod caeteris deest. mss. 1 et 1 Reg. et 1 Colb. pro veritate, habent caritate.

"He was far from faith and truth." From all the manuscripts and several editions I have added "from faith," which is missing in the rest. Manuscripts 1 and Regius 1 and Colbert 1 have "charity" for "truth."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Aristophanes… Aristarchus› · col 556

Aristophanes... Aristarchus. Probabile, monente Heumanno, ex conjunctione, Aristophanem Byzantinum grammaticum, praeceptorem hic commemorati Aristarchi Grammatici intelligi... De utroque plura Fabricius bib. Gr. vol. VII, pag. 51 et 53. Bun.

"Aristophanes … Aristarchus." It is probable, as Heumann points out, from the pairing, that Aristophanes of Byzantium the grammarian is meant, the teacher of the grammarian Aristarchus mentioned here … On both Fabricius has more, Bibliotheca Graeca volume VII, pages 51 and 53. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ab his› · col 556

Ab his. Ab apostolis scilicet, quorum mentionem facit praecedenti capite.

"From these." From the apostles, that is, whom he mentions in the preceding chapter.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Aut quis possit› · col 556

Aut quis possit. Mss. Jun. Colb. et 4 impressi, posset. In scriptis rec. 2 Reg., 3 Colb., Bodl., Cotton., 1 Clarom., quasi possit.

"Or who could." The Junius-Colbert manuscript and four printed editions have "posset." In the recent manuscripts Regius 2, Colbert 3, the Bodleian, the Cotton and Clermont 1, "as if he could."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Apta inter se et cohaerentia› · col 556

Apta inter se et cohaerentia. Vid. lib. I, c. 4. Cic. lib. II Philipp., c. 8: Tam eras excors, ut tota in oratione tua tecum ipse pugnares: ut non modo (pro non modo non), cohaerentia inter se diceres, sed maxime disjuncta atque contraria. Bun.

"Things fitting and coherent with one another." See book I, chapter 4. Cicero, Philippics II, chapter 8: "You were so witless that through your whole speech you fought with yourself, so that not only did you not say (for 'not only not') things coherent with one another, but things utterly at odds and contrary." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Consentit› · col 556

Consentit. De philosophorum dissensionibus et contrarietatibus, atque de sacrarum Scripturarum concordia lege S. Augustinum, lib. XVIII de Civitate Dei, cap. 41.

"It agrees." On the disagreements and contradictions of the philosophers, and on the concord of the sacred Scriptures, read Saint Augustine, City of God book XVIII, chapter 41.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non enim quaestus› · col 556

Non enim questus. Ita reposui ex 4 antiquissimis (continues)

"For not gain." So I have restored from four very ancient (continues)

(printed under page 291)

Page

  • running head: 555 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. (cut off at the right edge)
  • marginal letters: A disset aliquando, quippe cum sapientiae professor; B nos, ut humane ac benigne consulere putaretur; C Pro sua vanitate. Sic ms. Goth. (in the Variorum notes); D Epiphanius de ejus saevitia agit (in the Variorum notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "disset", the rest of a word broken from column 554; English begins mid-word accordingly. Lowercase "in quibus" after the full stop is set as printed. The full-width heading VARIORUM NOTAE (cut off at the right edge) and the Variorum notes beneath it are not set (later pass).
PL 6:556
divinae litterae inciderunt. Quae igitur temeritas erat id audere dissolvere, quod illi nemo interpretatus est? Bene, quod aut nihil didicit, aut nihil intellexit. Tantum enim abest a divinis litteris repugnantia, quantum ille abfuit a fide et veritate: praecipue tamen Paulum Petrumque laceravit, caeterosque discipulos, tanquam fallaciae seminatores, quos eosdem tamen rudes et indoctos fuisse testatus est; nam quosdam eorum piscatorio artificio fecisse quaestum: quasi aegre ferret, quod illam rem non Aristophanes aliquis aut Aristarchus commentatus sit.
the divine writings fell. What rashness was it, then, to dare to undo what no one had interpreted for him? It is well that he either learned nothing or understood nothing. For contradiction is as far from the divine writings as he was from faith and truth. Above all, however, he tore at Paul and Peter and the other disciples as sowers of deceit, whom he nevertheless testified to have been unpolished and unlearned, for he said that some of them had made their living by the fisherman's craft: as if he took it ill that no Aristophanes or Aristarchus had written a commentary on that matter.
CAPUT III.
Chapter III.
De Veritate christianae doctrinae, et adversariorum vanitate; atque Christum non fuisse magum.
On the truth of Christian doctrine and the emptiness of its adversaries; and that Christ was not a magician.
Abfuit ergo ab his fingendi voluntas et astutia, quoniam rudes fuerunt. Aut quis possit indoctus apta inter se et cohaerentia fingere, cum philosophorum doctissimi Plato, et Aristoteles, et Epicurus, et Zeno, ipsi sibi repugnantia et contraria dixerint? Haec est enim mendaciorum natura, ut cohaerere non possint. Illorum autem traditio, quia vera est, quadrat undique, ac sibi tota consentit; et ideo persuadet, quia constanti ratione suffulta est. Non enim quaestus et
So the will and the cunning to invent were absent from them, since they were unpolished men. Or how could an unlearned man invent things that fit together and cohere among themselves, when the most learned of the philosophers, Plato and Aristotle and Epicurus and Zeno, said things that contradicted and opposed themselves? For this is the nature of lies, that they cannot hold together. But their tradition, because it is true, squares on every side and agrees with itself throughout; and it persuades for this reason, that it is supported by consistent reasoning. For it was not for gain and
Editors' notes and page, col. 556

Page

  • running head: [LAC]TANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 556 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A divinae litterae inciderunt; B beside the second line of the italic summary (nitate; atque Christum non fuisse magum), just above Abfuit ergo; C accensus emendavi (in the Variorum notae); D Heumanno, ex conjunctione (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-sentence at "quaestus et"; italic chapter summary under CAPUT III set as printed on its own line (editors' matter: De Veritate christianae doctrinae); the VARIORUM NOTAE at the page foot (pric diceretur accensus fidei ... Non enim questus) not set, left for the later pass; the heading "[VA]RIORUM NOTAE" runs across the page width and is cut off at the left edge, so it is not set; stray mark before "vera" in "quia vera est" ignored; left column (555) fragments visible at the left edge not set
PL 6:557
commodi gratia religionem istam commenti sunt; quippe qui, et praeceptis, et re ipsa, eam vitam secuti sunt, quae et voluptatibus caret et omnia quae habentur in bonis spernit; et qui non tantum pro fide mortem subierint, sed etiam morituros esse se, et scierint, et praedixerint, et postea universos, qui eorum disciplinam secuti essent, acerba et nefanda passuros. Ipsum autem Christum affirmavit a Judaeis fugatum, collecta nongentorum hominum manu, latrocinia fecisse. Quis tantae auctoritati audeat repugnare? Credamus hoc plane; nam fortasse hoc illi in somnis Apollo aliquis nuntiavit. Tot semper latrones perierunt, et quotidie pereunt; utique multos et ipse damnasti: quis eorum post crucem suam, non dicam deus, sed homo appellatus est? Verum tu forsitan ex eo credidisti, quia vos homicidam Martem consecrastis, ut deum: quod tamen non fecissetis, si illum Areopagitae in crucem sustulissent.
advantage that they devised this religion; since they followed, both in precepts and in deed itself, that life which both lacks pleasures and spurns all things that are counted among goods; and who not only underwent death for the faith, but also both knew and foretold that they themselves would die, and that afterwards all who had followed their teaching would suffer bitter and unspeakable things. But he asserted that Christ Himself, having been driven out by the Jews, gathered a band of nine hundred men and committed robberies. Who would dare to resist so great an authority? Let us believe this outright; for perhaps some Apollo announced this to him in his sleep. So many robbers have always perished, and perish daily; indeed you yourself have condemned many: which of them after his cross was called, I do not say a god, but even a man? But perhaps you believed it on this ground, that you consecrated the murderer Mars as a god: which, however, you would not have done if the Areopagites had raised him up on a cross.
Idem cum facta ejus mirabilia destrueret, nec tamen negaret, voluit ostendere, Apollonium
The same man, while he was destroying His wondrous deeds, and yet not denying them, wished to show that Apollonius
Editors' notes and page, col. 557

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Non enim quaestus› · col 557

mss. 1 Bon., Jun., Cauc., Regio-Put. et edit. Is. In aliis pro enim est igitur.

(continued) manuscripts, Bologna 1, the Junius, the Cauci, the Regius-Puteanus, and the Isaeus edition. In others "therefore" stands for "for."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nongentorum› · col 557

Nongentorum. Mss. 2 rec. et edd. fere omnes noningentorum. — Noningentorum. Quinque syll. omnes libri, praeter Goth. in quo, ingentorum, vitiose. In solo Heumanni textu, nongentorum, num consilio, an casu, nescio. Utramque formam Columell. lib. V, caput 2, ed. Gesner. habet. Prior rarior. Bun.

"Of nine hundred." Two recent manuscripts and almost all editions have "noningentorum." — "Noningentorum." All the books have the five-syllable form except the Gotha, which has "ingentorum," faultily. Only in Heumann's text is "nongentorum" found, whether by design or by chance I do not know. Columella, book V, chapter 2, Gesner's edition, has both forms. The former is the rarer. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: In somnis› · col 557

In somnis. Mss. 6 rec. et 4 edit. in somniis.

"In sleep." Six recent manuscripts and four editions have "in dreams."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Apollo› · col 557

Apollo. Alludit ad proverbium: Quid tibi Apollo cecinit?

"Apollo." He alludes to the proverb: "What did Apollo sing to you?"

(lemma) ‹anchor: Homicidam Martem› · col 557

Homicidam Martem. Vide supra. lib. I, cap. 10. Hoc epitheto Mars insignitur etiam apud Homerum.

"Mars the manslayer." See above, book I, chapter 10. Mars is marked by this epithet in Homer too.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Idem› · col 557

Idem. Sic restitui ex quamplurimis et veterrimis mss. In 7 rec. et pluribus editis est Item; in Brun. Deinde.

"The same man." So I have restored from very many and very old manuscripts. In seven recent manuscripts and several editions it is "Likewise"; in the Brunswick, "Then."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Apollonium› · col 557

Apollonium. Augustinus epist. V. ad Marcellinum: Quis autem vel risu dignum non putet, qui Apollonium vel Apuleium... conferre Christo vel etiam praeferre conatur? Huic parti, qua Christum cum Apollonio comparavit Hierocles, suum adversus Hieroclem librum Eusebius opposuit. Bun.

"Apollonius." Augustine, letter V to Marcellinus: "Who would not think even laughable a man who tries to compare Apollonius or Apuleius … with Christ, or even to prefer them?" Against this part, in which Hierocles compared Christ with Apollonius, Eusebius set his book against Hierocles. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Apollonium vel paria› · col 557, runs into col 558

Apollonium vel paria, etc. Apollonius Tyaneus scribitur, quod cum ante Domitianum steterit, in consistorio repente non comparuit: quod ut noscas, summatim delibabimus historiam. Apollonius Tyaneus, ut tradit Philostratus lib. IV, maximus philosophiae professor, magus, sive (ut potius Pythagorici volunt) philosophus, cum ad brachmanas profectus esset, audivisset que hierarcham in throno sedentem, Ephesiosque liberasset, plurimaque divinitus effecisset, accusatus est quod male de Domitiano sentiret, quodque magiam exerceret, aliaque id genus ridicula. Romam, jubente Domitiano, evolat Apollonius; se ad judicem sistit, in carcerem conjicitur, compedibusque reservatur ad judicium. Damis, qui solus illum fuerat secutus, cum ipso custoditur, cui ut fidem faceret, esse in sua potestate egrediendi ex carcere cum voluerit, ostendit compedes, ex quibus pedes retrahebat, et in easdem insinuabat ex animi sui sententia. Quod conspicatus Damis, tunc manifeste virum divinum credidit Apollonium, a quo praemissus est Puteolas, horamque, qua illum in littore praestolari deberet, praedixit. Educitur Apollonius e carcere, sistitur ante tribunal Domitiani, absolvitur ab imperatore. Sed discedere prohibitus, admonitusque a Domitiano esse sibi quae secum communicare vellet, illi in coetu maximo sic respondit Apollonius: Scias velim, domine, me non subdi tibi ullo fato, et ut plenius noveris tibi in caput meum non permitti potestatem, vale. Haec locutus subito evanuit, omnibus stupentibus, et novitate miraculoque rei vix suis credentibus: contendit ad Damim Apollonius, quem in littore spatiantem deprehendit anxium, et de ipso Tyaneo sollicitum. Ex Hieronymo. Joh. Bapt. Pius. Eunapius in proemio semideum quemdam facit, et Philostratum inscribere opus suum debuisse dicit, non, Ἀπολλωνίου βίον, sed θεοῦ εἰς ἀνθρώπους ἐπιδημίαν. Caracalla imperator tanti eum fecit, ut heroico monumento ornandum sibi existimarit. Hierocles blasphemus comparare cum Christo ausus fuit, quem libro proprio confutavit Eusebius. Meursius. — Hanc autem de Apollonio historiam fabulam esse contendunt omnes. Numeratur Apollonius inter celebres magos ab Arnobio libro 1. In ejus historia multa sane fabulosa, quaedam tamen vera esse existimat S. Hieronymus. Epist. ad Paulinum.

"Apollonius or equal things," etc. It is written of Apollonius of Tyana that, when he had stood before Domitian, he suddenly vanished from the council chamber; so that you may know this, we shall touch briefly on the story. Apollonius of Tyana, as Philostratus relates in book IV, a very great professor of philosophy, a magician, or (as the Pythagoreans prefer) a philosopher, having travelled to the Brahmans, heard the hierarch sitting on his throne, delivered the Ephesians and done a great many things by divine power, was accused of thinking ill of Domitian, of practising magic, and of other absurdities of that kind. At Domitian's command Apollonius hastens to Rome; he presents himself to the judge, is thrown into prison and kept in fetters for trial. Damis, who alone had followed him, is held in custody with him; to convince him that it was in his power to leave the prison when he wished, he showed him the fetters, from which he drew out his feet and slipped them back in at will. Seeing this, Damis then clearly believed Apollonius to be a divine man; Apollonius sent him ahead to Puteoli and foretold the hour at which he should wait for him on the shore. Apollonius is brought out of prison, set before Domitian's tribunal, and acquitted by the emperor. But when he was forbidden to leave and told by Domitian that there were things he wished to discuss with him, Apollonius answered him thus before a very large assembly: "I would have you know, lord, that I am subject to you by no fate, and that you may know more fully that no power over my life is granted to you, farewell." Having said this he suddenly vanished, while all were amazed and, at the novelty and wonder of the thing, scarcely believed their eyes. Apollonius hurried to Damis, whom he found walking on the shore, anxious and troubled about the Tyanean himself. From Jerome. Giovanni Battista Pio. Eunapius in his preface makes him a kind of demigod, and says Philostratus should have entitled his work not "Life of Apollonius" but "The sojourn of a god among men." The emperor Caracalla thought so much of him that he judged him worthy to be honoured with a hero's shrine. The blasphemer Hierocles dared to compare him with Christ, and Eusebius refuted him in a book of his own. Meursius. — But all maintain that this story of Apollonius is a fable. Arnobius, book 1, counts Apollonius among the famous magicians. Saint Jerome, in the letter to Paulinus, thinks there is much that is truly fabulous in his story, yet some things true.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Apuleium› · col 558

Apuleium. Qui magiae accusatus, pro se apologiam conscripsit.

"Apuleius." Who, accused of magic, wrote an apology in his own defence.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Domitianus› · col 558

Domitianus. Hujus rei meminit S. Hieronymus adversus errores Joannis Hierosolymitani.

"Domitian." Saint Jerome mentions this matter in his work against the errors of John of Jerusalem.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non comparuit› · col 558

Non comparuit. Vide vitam Apollonii a Philostrato, lib. IV.

"He was not seen." See the Life of Apollonius by Philostratus, book IV.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ipsa opera comparare› · col 558

Ipsa opera comparare. Ita cum 8 vet. editis omnes mss. praeter 1 Reg. rec. et Cauc., quibus est computare. Idem sentit Betuleius, qui comparare, ac post ipsum Thomasius, legi debere opinantur.

"To compare the works themselves." So, with eight old editions, all the manuscripts except the recent Regius 1 and the Cauci, which have "computare" (to reckon). Betuleius is of the same view, he and Thomasius after him holding that "comparare" should be read.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Cur statuas, cur imagines comparant› · col 558

Cur statuas, cur imagines comparant. Imagines funeribus nobilium fuisse adhibitas, testis Porphyrion ad illud Horatii, funus atque imagines ducunt triumphales: ubi sic ait interpres: In funere nobilissimis quibusque solebant praeferri imagines majorum, quod observari videmus in funeribus principum. Crebro hujus ritus meminere auctores. Cic. XI. Orat. Brute, quid sedes? quid illam anum patri nuntiare vis tuo? quid illis omnibus, quorum imagines duci vides? quid majoribus tuis? Val. Max. lib. VIII, cap. 15: Africanus imaginem in cella Jovis Opt. Max. positam habet: quae quoticscumque funus aliquod Corneliae genti celebrandum est, inde petitur. Epitome Livii XLVIII, de Lepido: Praecepit filios lecto se strato sine linteis, sine purpura efferrent, imaginum specie, non sumptibus nobilitari maximorum virorum funera solere. Tacit. lib. III. Annal. tradit de Junia 20, clarissimarum familiarum imagines (continues)

"Why do they procure statues, why images?" That images were used at the funerals of nobles is attested by Porphyrion on Horace's line "the funeral procession and the triumphal images lead the way," where the commentator says: "At the funeral of all the most noble it was customary to carry before them the images of their ancestors, which we see observed at the funerals of princes." Authors often mention this rite. Cicero, Oration XI (On the Orator): "Brutus, why do you sit? What do you want that old woman to report to your father? What to all those whose images you see led along? What to your ancestors?" Valerius Maximus, book VIII, chapter 15: "Africanus has his image placed in the shrine of Jupiter Best and Greatest; whenever any funeral is to be held for the Cornelian clan, it is fetched from there." The Epitome of Livy XLVIII, on Lepidus: "He instructed his sons to carry him out on a bier spread without linen and without purple, saying that the funerals of the greatest men were usually ennobled by the display of images, not by expense." Tacitus, Annals book III, relates of Junia, 20, that the images of the most illustrious families (continues)

(printed under page 292)

Page

  • running head: LIBER V. DE JUSTI[TIA] (cut off at the image edge); column number 557 at left
  • marginal letters: A ‹commodi gratia religionem istam›; B ‹tu forsitan ex eo credidisti›; C ‹In somnis. Mss. 6 rec.› (in the notes); D ‹professor, magus, sive› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width line "VARIORUM NOT[AE]" (cut off at the right edge) stands below "voluit ostendere, Apollonium", not set; the Variorum notae below it (from "mss. 1 Bon., Jun." to "secum communicare vellet,") are page-foot commentary, left for the later pass; column ends mid-sentence at "Apollonium"
PL 6:558
vel paria, vel etiam majora fecisse. Mirum quod Apuleium praetermisit, cujus solent, et multa, et mira memorari. Cur igitur, o delirum caput, nemo Apollonium pro Deo colit? nisi forte tu solus, illo scilicet deo dignus, cum quo te in sempiternum verus Deus puniet. Si magus Christus, quia mirabilia fecit, peritior utique Apollonius, qui (ut describis) cum Domitianus eum punire vellet, repente in judicio non comparuit, quam ille, qui et comprehensus est, et cruci affixus. Atenim ex hoc ipso fortasse insolentiam Christi voluit arguere, quod Deum se constituerit, ut ille verecundior fuisse videatur, qui cum majora faceret, ut hic putat, tamen id sibi non arrogaverit. Omitto nunc ipsa opera comparare, quia in secundo et superiore libro de fraude, ac praestigiis artis magicae dixi. Nego esse quemquam qui non optet in primis id sibi post mortem contingere, quod etiam reges maximi concupiscunt. Cur enim sibi homines sepulcra magnifica, cur statuas, cur imagines comparant? cur aliquibus claris factis, aut etiam pro civibus morte suscepta, student opiniones hominum
had done either equal or even greater things. It is strange that he passed over Apuleius, of whom both many and wonderful things are customarily related. Why then, O crazed head, does no one worship Apollonius as God? Unless perhaps you alone do, being, no doubt, worthy of that god, with whom the true God will punish you for ever. If Christ was a magician because He did wonderful things, then Apollonius was surely more skilled, who (as you describe) when Domitian wished to punish him, suddenly did not appear at the trial, than He who was both seized and fastened to a cross. But perhaps from this very fact he wished to convict Christ of arrogance, that He made Himself God, so that the other might seem to have been more modest, who, although he did greater things, as this man thinks, nevertheless did not arrogate this to himself. I pass over for now comparing the works themselves, because in the second and the preceding book I have spoken of the fraud and illusions of the magic art. I deny that there is anyone who does not wish above all that the thing should befall him after death which even the greatest kings desire. For why do men procure for themselves magnificent tombs, why statues, why images? Why, by some famous deeds, or even by death undergone for their fellow citizens, do they strive to earn the good opinion
Editors' notes and page, col. 558

Page

  • running head: [LIBE]R V. DE JUSTITIA. 558 (left part of the head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹vel paria, vel etiam majora fecisse›; B ‹artis magicae dixi. Nego esse›; C ‹Tyaneo sollicitum. Ex Hieronymo› (in the Variorum notes); D ‹mss. praeter 1 Reg. rec.› (in the Variorum notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "comprehensus est": the e looks like o in the scan ("ost"), taken as worn type, set est; column ends mid-word "homi-" (hominum continues in the next column); the VARIORUM NOTAE at the page foot (from "illi in coetu maximo sic respondit Apollonius" to "clarissimarum familiarum imagines") are not set here, left for the later pass; the cut-off text at the left edge belongs to col. 557; the full-width heading "[V]ARIORUM NOTAE" is not set
  • other: the word hominum was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 559
PL 6:559
promereri? Cur denique ipse ingenii tui monimentum, hac detestabili stultitia tanquam coeno aedificatum, constituere voluisti, nisi quod immortalitatem de memoria nominis speras? Stultum igitur est, id putare Apollonium noluisse, quod optaret utique, si posset; quia nemo est qui immortalitatem recuset, maxime cum eum dicas, et adoratum esse a quibusdam sicut deum, et simulacrum ejus sub Herculis Alexicaci nomine constitutum, ab Ephesiis etiam nunc honorari.
of men? Why, finally, did you yourself wish to set up this monument of your genius, built out of this detestable folly as if out of mud, unless because you hope for immortality from the memory of your name? It is foolish, therefore, to think that Apollonius did not want what he would certainly have wished for, had he been able; since there is no one who would refuse immortality, especially since you say of him both that he was worshipped by some as a god, and that a statue of him, set up under the name of Hercules Alexicacus, is honoured by the Ephesians even now.
Non potuit ergo post mortem deus credi, quia et hominem, et magum fuisse constabat; et ideo alieni nominis titulo affectavit divinitatem, quia suo nec poterat, nec audebat. Noster vero et potuit deus
He could not, therefore, be believed a god after death, because it was established that he had been both a man and a magician; and for that reason he aspired to divinity under the title of another's name, because under his own he neither could nor dared. But ours both could be believed God,
Editors' notes and page, col. 559

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Cur statuas, cur imagines comparant› · col 559, runs into col 560

ante latas fuisse. Idem. l. IV, de funere Drusi. Circumfusas lecto Claudiorum Liviorumque imagines, defletum in foro, laudatum pro rostris. Neque in Germanici funere eas praelatas, auctor est Tacit. lib. II: Funus sine imaginibus et pompa, per laudes et memoriam virtutum ejus celebre fuit. Erant autem hae imagines nihil aliud, quam expressa corporis effigies humerorum tenus e cera, consolationis ergo asservatae. Hujusmodi imaginibus atria sua nobiles Romani exornabant, collocando eas ordine in ligneis quibusdam thecis, vel armariis, unde exsequiarum tempore depromebantur, ut colligere est ex Plinio lib. XXXV, cap. 2: Expressi cera vultus singulis disponebantur armariis, ut essent imaginesque comitarentur gentilitia funera, semperque defuncto aliquo, totus aderat familiae ejus, qui unquam fuerat, populus. In principum tamen funeribus non solum gentilitiae, sed quorumlibet magnorum virorum ac virtute praestantium imagines praelatae, ut in funere Augusti, Dio lib. LVI. Idem factum in aliis exsequiis. Si quis turpis et immani crimine damnatus esset, ejus imago damnari et frangi solebat, nec in exsequiis ferebatur. Vide Juvenalem Sat. 8, Tacit. lib. I Annal. Sic Bruti et Cassii imagines abolitas docet Tacitus in fine lib. III Annal., 20. Quot igitur majorum imagines, totidem videntur lectuli funeribus praelati, ita ut suus cuilibet imagini lectulus esset, in quo portabatur: quanquam interdum, non in hujusmodi lectis, sed in oblongis perticis, vel hastis imagines has fuisse latas, ut ferculis triumphorum solebant, non inepte quis aestimaverit, praeeunte nobis ad hanc conjecturam Silio lib. X, de funere Pauli. Non conjux native aderant, non juncta propinquo Sanguine turba virum, aut celsis de more feretris Praecedens prisca exsequias decorabat imago. Porro non imagines solum, sed et simulcra gentium urbiumque subactarum, et nomina sub titulis hostium victorum, ipsaque spolia ab hostibus capta praeferri et exhiberi solebant in funeribus imperatorum, ut videtur apud Dionysium Halicarn. lib. VIII, de funere Coriolani. Tacitus de funebri pompa Augusti: Tunc consultatum est de honoribus, ex quibus maxime insignes visi, ut porta triumphali funus duceretur: Gallus Asinius, ut legum latarum tituli, victarum ab eo gentium vocabula anteferrentur. Quod etiam factum esse dicit Dio lib. LVI. Id ipsum de Pertinacis funere narrat idem auctor lib. LXXIV. Transierunt deinde nationes omnes subjectae imperio Rom. in statuis aeneis, sic ornatis, ut est cujusque gentis patria consuetudo. Intellexit hoc Lucanus lib. VIII, de funere Pompeii, quem non petere dicit, Praeferat ut veteres feralis pompa triumphos. Quin imo lictores cum fascibus, aliaque insignia magistratuum, quos olim gesserant, praecessisse, Polybius tradidit lib. VI. Et notandum, fasces hosce verti solitos, ut discimus ex Tacito lib. III Annal., de funere Germanici: Igitur tribunorum centurionumque humeris cineres portabantur: praecedebant incompta signa, versi fasces. Quem morem tetigisse videtur Virgil. Aeneid., lib. XI. Albinovanus in funere Drusi: Quos primum vidi fasces, in funere vidi; Et vidi versos, indiciumque mali. Joan. Kirchmannus. — Porro notandum est has cereas imagines olim etiam in funere regnum nostrorum fuisse cum summo honore delatas.

(continued) were carried before her. The same, book IV, on the funeral of Drusus: "The images of the Claudii and Livii poured round his bier; he was mourned in the forum and praised from the rostra." Tacitus, book II, tells us they were not carried before Germanicus's funeral: "A funeral without images or procession, made famous by praise and the memory of his virtues." These images were nothing other than a moulded likeness of the body down to the shoulders, in wax, kept for consolation's sake. The Roman nobles adorned their halls with such images, setting them in order in wooden cases or cupboards, from which they were taken out at the time of funerals, as may be gathered from Pliny, book XXXV, chapter 2: "Faces moulded in wax were arranged in separate cupboards, so that there might be images to accompany the clan's funerals, and whenever someone died, the whole people of his family that had ever existed was present." At the funerals of emperors, however, not only the family's images but those of any great men eminent in virtue were carried before, as at the funeral of Augustus, Dio book LVI. The same was done at other funerals. If anyone had been condemned for a foul and monstrous crime, his image was usually condemned and broken, and was not carried at funerals. See Juvenal, Satire 8; Tacitus, Annals book I. Thus Tacitus, at the end of Annals book III, 20, tells that the images of Brutus and Cassius were abolished. So it seems that as many little biers were carried before the funeral as there were ancestral images, so that each image had its own bier on which it was borne; though one might not unreasonably judge that these images were sometimes carried not on such biers but on long poles or spears, as was done with the litters of triumphs, Silius, book X, on the funeral of Paulus, leading us to this conjecture: "No wife was present, no crowd of men joined by near blood, nor did the ancient image, going before on lofty biers as was the custom, adorn the obsequies." Moreover, not only images but also effigies of the subdued nations and cities, and the names of conquered enemies under inscriptions, and the very spoils taken from the enemy, used to be carried before and displayed at the funerals of commanders, as appears in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, book VIII, on the funeral of Coriolanus. Tacitus on the funeral procession of Augustus: "Then there was debate about honours, of which these seemed the most notable: that the funeral should be led through the triumphal gate; Gallus Asinius, that the titles of the laws he had passed and the names of the nations he had conquered should be carried before." Dio, book LVI, says this was done as well. The same author tells the same of Pertinax's funeral, book LXXIV. Then all the nations subject to the Roman empire passed by in bronze statues, each adorned according to the native custom of its people. Lucan meant this in book VIII, on the funeral of Pompey, who, he says, does not ask "that the funeral procession should carry his old triumphs before him." Indeed, Polybius relates in book VI that lictors with the fasces and the other insignia of the magistracies they had once held went before. And it should be noted that these fasces were usually reversed, as we learn from Tacitus, Annals book III, on the funeral of Germanicus: "So the ashes were carried on the shoulders of tribunes and centurions; before them went unadorned standards and reversed fasces." Virgil seems to have touched on this custom, Aeneid book XI. Albinovanus, on the funeral of Drusus: "The fasces I first saw, I saw at a funeral; and I saw them reversed, a sign of evil." Johann Kirchmann. — It should further be noted that these wax images were once also carried with the highest honour at the funerals of our own kings.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Cum eum dicas› · col 559

Cum eum dicas. Addidi eum ex omnibus mss. et impressis, praeter 1 Colb.

"When you call him." I have added "him" from all the manuscripts and printed editions except Colbert 1.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Adoratum esse a quibusdam, sicut deum› · col 559

Adoratum esse a quibusdam, sicut deum. Vopiscus d. l. Apollonium dicit ipsum pro numine frequentandum. Et paucis interjectis de eodem: Norat vultum philosophi venerabilis Aurelianus, atque in multis ejus imaginem viderat templis. Cell.

"That he was worshipped by some as a god." Vopiscus, in the place cited, says that Apollonius himself is to be visited as a divinity. And a few lines later, of the same man: "Aurelian knew the face of the venerable philosopher and had seen his image in many temples." Cellarius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Alexicaci› · col 559

Alexicaci. Id est, malorum depulsoris. Cum Ephesus peste laboraret, liberavit eam Apollonius hoc modo, si tamen Philostrato credatur. Convocato in concionem ad sacra facienda populo, comparuit mendicus habitu, qui facile homines ad misericordiam commoveret, jussitque Ephesios eum lapidibus obruere. Cunctante vero prae misericordia populo, instabat Apollonius tamdiu, dum aliquos saltem ad lapides tollendos perduceret. Mendicus cum semel atque iterum igneos ostenderet oculos, tota turba ipsum daemonem rata, lapidibus obruit. Remotis post lapidibus, jacuit in medio cadaver canis exanime. Liberati ex hoc Ephesii a peste, illi ceu Herculi ἀποτροπαίῳ (sic enim apud Philostratum legitur, non ἀλεξικάκῳ) statuam posuerunt. Est alioquin hoc epitheton Herculis. Betul.

"Of the Averter of evil." That is, of the one who drives away evils. When Ephesus was suffering from plague, Apollonius freed it in this way, if Philostratus is to be believed. When the people had been called to an assembly to offer sacrifice, a beggar appeared, of a dress that would easily move men to pity, and he ordered the Ephesians to stone him. When the people hesitated out of pity, Apollonius pressed them until he brought at least some to take up stones. When the beggar showed fiery eyes once and again, the whole crowd, judging him a demon, stoned him. When the stones were afterwards removed, there lay in the midst the lifeless carcass of a dog. The Ephesians, freed from the plague by this, set up a statue to him as to Hercules "the Averter" (for so it reads in Philostratus, ἀποτροπαίῳ, not ἀλεξικάκῳ). This is in any case an epithet of Hercules. Betuleius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et creditus est, quia vere fuit› · col 560

Et creditus est, quia vere fuit. Sic restitui ex omnibus ferme mss. et edit. Cellar. In 2 Reg. rec. et 16 excusis legitur verus; in Brun. et creditus est Deus, quia vere Deus fuit.

"And he was believed, because he truly was." So I have restored from almost all the manuscripts and Cellarius's edition. In the recent Regius 2 and sixteen printed editions "true" is read; in the Brunswick, "and he was believed God, because he truly was God."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sacramentum› · col 560

Sacramentum. Id est, mysterium, modo loquendi Lactantio proprio.

"Sacrament." That is, mystery, in a manner of speaking peculiar to Lactantius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Assignatum› · col 560

Assignatum. 1 Colb. a secunda manu et 6 vet. edit. obsignatum; Jun. signatum.

"Assigned." Colbert 1 in a second hand and six old editions have "sealed up"; the Junius, "sealed."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Legerent› · col 560

Legerent. Ita restitui ex mss. 5 Reg. et 2 Brun. ac pluribus vet. editis, approbante Francio; multis est legerint; scriptis 4 rec. totidemque editis ignoraverunt.

"They read." So I have restored from Regius 5, Brunswick 2 and several old editions, with Francius approving; many have "legerint"; four recent manuscripts and as many editions have "they did not know."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non solum idcirco a nobis› · col 560

Non solum idcirco a nobis, etc. Ita mss. 10 Reg., 1 Bonon. antiq. et 5 editi. Abest solum a 14 mss. totidemque impressis. Attamen addendum esse judicat Thomasius.

"Not only for this reason by us," etc. So ten Regius manuscripts, the ancient Bologna 1 and five editions. "Only" is absent from fourteen manuscripts and as many printed editions. Thomasius nevertheless judges that it should be added.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non solum idcirco….. verum etiam quia vidimus› · col 560

Non solum idcirco..... verum etiam quia vidimus. Lib. IV, cap. 13. Nam quod ait (Apollo) portentifica illum (Christum) opera fecisse, quo maxime divinitatis fidem meruit, adsentiri nobis jam videtur, quum dicit eadem quibus nos gloriamur. Epit. c. 45. ob haec (continues)

"Not only for this reason … but also because we have seen." Book IV, chapter 13: "For when he (Apollo) says that he (Christ) did wonder-working deeds, by which above all he earned belief in his divinity, he now seems to agree with us, since he says the same things in which we glory." Epitome chapter 45: "for these things (continues)

(printed under page 293)

Page

  • running head: 559 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN.
  • marginal letters: A num promereri? Cur denique; B poterat, nec audebat. Noster vero; C magnorum virorum ac virtute (in the Variorum notae); D tium urbiumque subactarum (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "num" at the head of the column is taken as the end of a word broken from col. 558 (probably divi-num); the English supplement "[divine honour]" is UNSURE and should be checked against col. 558. The column ends at "deus"; "credi" begins col. 560 and is not hyphenated. "Ilercu-lis" is read as Herculis; the H looks like damaged type. The full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" stands between the text and the notes; it is cut off at the right edge and is not set. The Variorum notae at the page foot ("ante latas fuisse. Idem. l. IV, de funere Drusi" to "praecessisse, Poly-") are not set and are left for the apparatus pass.
  • other (Q2a): the English of this part now opens "of men?", not "[divine honour]"; whether col. 558 ends "homi-" (hominum) or another word, and whether its English carries "promereri", is UNSURE: check at col. 558. The lemmas Cum eum dicas, Adoratum esse and Alexicaci stand in this column's text (labels corrected from col 560). The English across the 559/560 break (Noster vero et potuit deus | credi) is now rendered "could be believed God, | because ...".
PL 6:560
credi, quia magus non fuit; et creditus est, quia ver⟨e⟩ fuit. Non, inquit, hoc dico, idcirco Apollonium non haberi deum, quia noluerit: sed ut appareat nos sapientiores esse, qui mirabilibus factis non statim fidem divinitatis adjunximus, quam vos, qui ob exigua portenta deum credidistis. Non est mirum, si tu, qui a Dei sapientia longe remotus es, nihil prorsus intelligis eorum quae legisti; cum Judaei, qui a principio prophetas lectitaverant, quibusque sacramentum Dei fuerat assignatum, tamen quid legerent, ignoraverint. Disce igitur, si quid tibi cordis est, non solum idcirco a nobis Deum creditum Christum, quia mirabilia fecit, sed quia vidimus in eo facta esse omnia, quae nobis annuntiata sunt vaticinio prophetarum. Fecit mirabilia:
because He was not a magician; and He was believed, because He truly was [God]. 'I do not say this,' he says, 'that Apollonius is not held to be a god for the reason that he did not wish it: but so that it may be apparent that we are wiser, who did not at once attach belief in divinity to marvellous deeds, than you, who on account of slight portents believed [Him] a god.' It is no wonder if you, who are far removed from the wisdom of God, understand nothing at all of the things which you have read; since the Jews, who from the beginning had been reading the prophets, and to whom the mystery of God had been assigned, nevertheless did not know what they were reading. Learn therefore, if you have any heart, that Christ has been believed God by us not only for the reason that He did marvellous things, but because we saw accomplished in Him all the things which were announced to us by the prophecy of the prophets. He did marvellous things:
Editors' notes and page, col. 560

Page

  • running head: [LAC]TANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 560 (left part cut off at image edge; column number printed 5C0)
  • marginal letters: A credi, quia magus non fuit; B bis annuntiata sunt vaticinio; C philosophi venerabilis Aurelianus (in the notes); D excusis legitur verus (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "verc" in the first line read as vere with a damaged final e, set ver⟨e⟩; possibly a misprinted c instead. Text ends with "mi-", broken at the column break (mirabilia?). The full-width heading "[VA]RIORUM NOTAE.", cut off at the left edge, stands between the text and the notes and is not set. The Variorum notes in the lower part of the column (Kirchmannus, Cellarius, Betuleius etc.) are left for the later pass.
PL 6:561
magum putassemus, ut et vos nunc putatis, et Judaei tunc putaverunt, si non illa ipsa facturum Christum prophetae omnes uno spiritu praedicassent. Itaque Deum credimus, non magis ex factis operibusque mirandis, quam ex illa ipsa cruce, quam vos sicut canes lambitis: quoniam simul et illa praedicta est. Non igitur suo testimonio (cui enim de se dicenti potest credi?), sed prophetarum testimonio, qui omnia, quae fecit ac passus est, multo ante cecinerunt, fidem divinitatis accepit; quod neque Apollonio, neque Apuleio, neque cuiquam magorum potuit, aut potest aliquando contingere. Cum igitur talia ignorantiae suae deliramenta fudisset, cum veritatem penitus excidere connisus esset, ausus est libros suos nefarios, ac Dei hostes, φιλαληθεῖς annotare. O caecum pectus! o mentem Cimmeriis (ut aiunt) tenebris atriorem! Discipulus hic fortasse Anaxagorae fuerit, cui nives atramentum fuerunt. Atqui eadem caecitas est, et vero falsitatis, et mendacio veritatis nomen imponere. Videlicet homo subdolus voluit lupum sub ovis pelle celare, ut fallaci titulo posset irretire lectorem. Verum esto, inscitia hoc, non malitia feceris. Quam tandem nobis attulisti veritatem? nisi quod assertor deorum, eos ipsos ad ultimum prodidisti. Prosecutus enim summi Dei laudes, quem regem, quem maximum, quem opificem rerum, quem fontem bonorum, quem parentem omnium, quem factorem altoremque viventium confessus es, ademisti Jovi tuo regnum, eumque summa potestate depulsum in ministrorum numerum redegisti. Epilogus itaque
we would have thought Him a magician, as you too now think and as the Jews then thought, if all the prophets with one spirit had not foretold that Christ would do those very things. Therefore we believe Him God, not more from His deeds and wonderful works than from that very cross which you lick at like dogs: since that too was foretold together with them. Not, then, by His own testimony (for who can be believed when speaking about himself?), but by the testimony of the prophets, who long beforehand sang of all the things that He did and suffered, did He receive credence of His divinity; which could not, nor can ever, befall Apollonius, nor Apuleius, nor any of the magicians. When, therefore, he had poured out such ravings of his ignorance, when he had striven to cut out the truth utterly, he dared to entitle his wicked books, enemies of God, Philalētheis [Lovers of Truth]. O blind heart! O mind darker than Cimmerian darkness (as they say)! This man was perhaps a disciple of Anaxagoras, for whom snows were black. Yet it is the same blindness both to put the name of falsehood upon truth and the name of truth upon a lie. Clearly the crafty man wished to hide the wolf under a sheep's skin, so that by a deceitful title he might ensnare the reader. But be it so: suppose you did this from ignorance, not from malice. What truth, pray, have you brought us? Only that, as champion of the gods, you have in the end betrayed those very gods. For, having set out the praises of the supreme God, whom you confessed to be king, greatest, maker of things, fount of good things, parent of all, maker and nourisher of the living, you took away from your Jupiter his kingdom, and, having driven him from supreme power, reduced him to the number of the ministers. The epilogue therefore
Editors' notes and page, col. 561

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Non solum idcirco….. verum etiam quia vidimus› · col 561

miracula quum... multitudo... ut erat, Dei filium... crederet.

(continued) miracles, since … the multitude … believed him, as he was, the Son of God."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nunc putatis› · col 561

Nunc putatis. Sic rescribo cum mss. 1 Reg. antiquissimo et 1 al. Reg. recentiori, sed bonae notae, ac edit. Gymnic. et ita Sparkius legendum esse censet, quam lectionem confirmant proxime sequentia. Quaedam scripta et impressa legunt nuncupatis.

"Now you think." So I write, with the very ancient Regius 1 and another, more recent Regius 1 of good quality, and Gymnicus's edition; and Sparke judges it should be read so, a reading confirmed by what immediately follows. Some manuscripts and printed editions read "nuncupatis" (you name).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Prophetae omnes› · col 561

Prophetae omnes, etc. Ita mss. vet. 4 Reg. et Marm. a prima manu, cum pluribus editis.

"All the prophets," etc. So the old manuscripts Regius 4 and the Marmoutier in the first hand, with several editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non magis ex factis› · col 561

Non magis ex factis. 1 Bonon. tam ex factis.

"No more from deeds." Bologna 1 has "as much from deeds."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sicut canes lambitis› · col 561

Sicut canes lambitis. Cicero lib. III, in Verr., cap. 11. Quos (canes) tribunal meum vides lambere. Fortius Ammian. Marcell. l. XV, c. 3: Tribunal unius legati non lambentes, sed membra totius reipublicae... vexantes. Bun.

"You lick like dogs." Cicero, Against Verres book III, chapter 11: "Whom (the dogs) you see licking my tribunal." More strongly Ammianus Marcellinus, book XV, chapter 3: "Not licking the tribunal of a single legate, but harrying … the limbs of the whole commonwealth." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Potuit, aut› · col 561

Potuit, aut. Addidi ex omnibus mss. et plerisque editis.

"Could, or." I have added it from all the manuscripts and most editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Excidere› · col 561

Excidere. 1 Bonon. antiq. Goth. et edit. Is. ex dere; 1 Reg. rec. excidere.

"To cut out." The ancient Bologna 1, the Gotha and the Isaeus edition have "ex dere"; the recent Regius 1, "excidere."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Connisus› · col 561

Connisus. Mss. 10 rec. connixus.

"Having striven." Ten recent manuscripts have "connixus."

(lemma) ‹anchor: φιλαληθεῖς› · col 561

Φιλαληθεῖς. Id est, veritatis studiosos et amatores, quo etiam titulo Hierocles decoravit librum, quem contra christianos scripserat.

"Philalêtheis." That is, men eager for and lovers of truth, the title with which Hierocles adorned the book he had written against the Christians.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Annotare› · col 561

Annotare. Walchius exponit, allegare, citare, ut simul significet titulum. Barthius Adversar. l. L, c. 10, pr. f. 2363, recte explicat, inscribere: ita vero omnino elegantius alibi scribit l. I, c. 11; l. VI, c. 18; l. VII, c. 18. Bun.

"To entitle." Walch explains it as "to adduce, to cite," so that it signifies the title at the same time. Barth, Adversaria book L, chapter 10, beginning, folio 2363, rightly explains it as "to inscribe"; and indeed elsewhere he writes it altogether more elegantly, book I, chapter 11; book VI, chapter 18; book VII, chapter 18. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: O mentem cimmeriis (ut aiunt) tenebris atriorem› · col 561, runs into col 562

O mentem cimmeriis (ut aiunt) tenebris atriorem! Cimmerii populi fuerunt Scytici, a quibus Bosphorus Cimmerius nominatus est. In cujus ostio fuit oppidum Cimmerion, quod alio nomine Cerberion vocabatur, ut auctor est Plinius in quinto: existimat Strabo in septimo dictum esse, Bosphorum Cymmerium, quasi Cymbricum a Cymbris, qui incertis errabundi sedibus, usque ad Maeotim paludem militiam agitarunt. Cimmeriorum clima obscurum esse ac tenebrosum, putarunt antiqui, ut idem memorat in primo, cujus rei etiam meminit Homerus sic loquens de Cimmeriis: Illis sol nunquam Phaetontia lumina spargit, Perniciosa super nox semper tenditur istis. Tibullus quoque, Homerici carminis aemulator, ita cecinit in heroico poemate: Cimmerion etiam obscuras accessit ad arces, Quas nunquam candente dies apparuit ortu, Sive super terras Phoebus, seu curreret infra. Cum itaque Cimmeriorum regio esset tenebricosa, et aer caliginosus, deductum est inde Proverbium: Tenebrae Cimmeriae.

"O mind darker than Cimmerian (as they say) darkness!" The Cimmerians were a Scythian people, from whom the Cimmerian Bosporus was named. At its mouth was the town of Cimmerion, which was called by another name Cerberion, as Pliny states in his fifth book. Strabo, in his seventh, thinks it was called the Cymmerian Bosporus as if "Cymbric," from the Cimbri, who, wandering with no fixed seats, carried their warfare as far as the Maeotic marsh. The ancients thought the Cimmerians' region dark and shadowy, as the same author records in his first book, a thing Homer also mentions, speaking thus of the Cimmerians: "On them the sun never sheds Phaethon's light; deadly night is always stretched over them." Tibullus too, an imitator of Homer's poem, sang thus in a heroic poem: "He came even to the dark citadels of the Cimmerians, on which day never appeared at its bright rising, whether Phoebus ran above the earth or below." Since, then, the Cimmerians' land was gloomy and its air murky, the proverb "Cimmerian darkness" was derived from it.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Anaxagorae› · col 562

Anaxagorae. De quo jam dictum est supra libro III, cap. 23.

"Of Anaxagoras." Of whom something has already been said above, book III, chapter 23.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sub ovis pelle› · col 562

Sub ovis pelle. Alludit ad illud Christi Domini verbum, Matth. VII: Cavete vobis a pseudoprophetis, qui veniunt ad vos in vestitu ovium, sed intus sunt lupi rapaces.

"Under a sheep's skin." He alludes to that word of Christ the Lord, Matthew 7: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Enim› · col 562

Enim. Additum ex 6 excusis et omnibus mss. praeter 2 Reg. rec. in quibus deest, sicut et in editis ann. 1476, 1497, 1513 et 1515, atque delendum putat Heumannus.

"For." Added from six printed editions and all the manuscripts except the recent Regius 2, in which it is missing, as also in the editions of the years 1476, 1497, 1513 and 1515; and Heumann thinks it should be deleted.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ii ergo› · col 562

Ii ergo. 2 Reg. et edit. Crat. Hi ergo.

"Those, then." Regius 2 and Cratander's edition have "These, then."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Deo› · col 562

Deo. Abest Deo a 3 Colbert. et 5 vulgatis.

"To God." "To God" is absent from Colbert 3 and five common editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Uno semel impetu profligarem› · col 562

Uno semel impetu profligarem. Mss. 7 rec. et 5 edit. habent simul.

"That I might rout them at a single onset." Seven recent manuscripts and five editions have "simul" (together).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Monimentum injustitiae suae struxerint› · col 562

Monimentum injustitiae suae struxerint. Mss. 14 et edit. 5 struxerunt; 1 Bon. antiq. et Tax. instruxerint.

"Have built a monument of their injustice." Fourteen manuscripts and five editions have "struxerunt"; the ancient Bologna 1 and the Taxaquet, "instruxerint."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Cui Apologetico nomen est› · col 562

Cui Apologetico nomen est. Sic passim loqui amat Lactantius. Mss. rec. 2 Reg. et 4 Colb. ferunt Apologeticon; 1 Reg. rec. et Brun. Apologeticus.

"Whose name is Apologeticum." Lactantius likes to speak so throughout. The recent manuscripts Regius 2 and Colbert 4 have "Apologeticon"; the recent Regius 1 and the Brunswick, "Apologeticus."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Defensione› · col 562

Defensione. Defensio, hic est affirmatio.

"In defence." "Defence" here is affirmation.

(printed under page 294)

Page

  • running head: 561 LIBER V. DE JUSTI[TIA.] (cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹rabilia: magum putassemus›; B ‹pectus! o mentem Cimmeriis›; C ‹in ministrorum numerum redegisti›; D ‹editis.› (in the Variorum Notae at page foot)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width heading "VARIORUM NOT[AE]" across both columns, cut off at the edge, not set; it stands below "in ministrorum numerum redegisti. Epilogus itaque". Variorum Notae at page foot not set (later pass). Greek φιλαληθεῖς accent read from small type. Column ends with a complete word (itaque), so no split at the column break.
PL 6:562
te tuus arguit stultitiae, vanitatis, erroris. Affirmas enim deos esse; et illos tamen subjicis et mancipas ei Deo, cujus religionem conaris evertere.
of yours convicts you of folly, of vanity, of error. For you affirm that there are gods; and yet you subject them and make them over as chattels to that God Whose religion you are trying to overthrow.
CAPUT IV.
Chapter IV.
Cur istud opus editum sit; atque iterum de Tertulliano et Cypriano.
Why this work was published; and again concerning Tertullian and Cyprian.
Ii ergo de quibus dixi, cum, praesente me, ac dolente, sacrilegas suas litteras explicassent, et illorum superba impietate stimulatus, et veritatis ipsius conscientia, et (ut ego arbitror) Deo, suscepi hoc munus, ut omnibus ingenii mei viribus accusatores justitiae refutarem: non ut contra hos scriberem, qui paucis verbis obteri poterant; sed ut omnes, qui ubique idem operis efficiunt, aut effecerunt, uno semel impetu profligarem. Non dubito enim, quin et alii plurimi, et multis in locis, et non modo graecis, sed etiam latinis litteris, monimentum injustitiae suae struxerint: quibus singulis quoniam respondere non poteram, sic agendam mihi hanc causam putavi, ut et priores cum omnibus suis scriptis perverterem, et futuris omnem facultatem scribendi aut respondendi amputarem. Praebeant modo aures: efficiam profecto ut quicumque ista cognoverit, aut suscipiat quod ante damnavit, aut, quod est proximum, deridere aliquando desistat. Quanquam Tertullianus eamdem causam plene peroraverit in eo libro cui Apologetico nomen est: tamen, quoniam aliud est accusantibus respondere, quod in defensione aut negatione sola positum est, aliud instituere, quod nos facimus,
So when those men of whom I have spoken had, in my presence and to my grief, set forth their sacrilegious writings, I, spurred on both by their proud impiety and by the consciousness of the truth itself and (as I judge) by God, took up this task: to refute the accusers of justice with all the powers of my intellect; not in order to write against these men, who could be crushed with a few words, but in order to rout in a single onslaught all who anywhere are doing, or have done, the same work. For I do not doubt that very many others too, and in many places, and not only in Greek but also in Latin letters, have built up a monument of their injustice; and since I could not answer each of them singly, I thought that this cause had to be conducted by me in such a way that I should both overturn the earlier ones together with all their writings, and cut off from those to come all power of writing or answering. Only let them lend their ears: I will certainly bring it about that whoever comes to know these things will either take up what he previously condemned, or, what is next to it, at last cease to deride it. Although Tertullian pleaded the same cause fully in that book which bears the name Apologeticum, yet, since it is one thing to answer accusers, which consists in defence or denial alone, and another to instruct, which we are doing,
Editors' notes and page, col. 562

Page

  • running head: R V. DE JUSTITIA. 562 (cut at left edge; the visible part of the page's running head)
  • marginal letters: A te tuus arguit; B impetu profligarem; C sola positum est; D cap. 23. (in the Variorum notae at the page foot)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the column opens with "te tuus arguit", continuing the sentence whose subject "Epilogus itaque" ends col. 561; nothing is supplied, and the English runs on across the break ("The epilogue therefore / of yours convicts you"); "in·eo" has a stray mark between the words, set as "in eo"; full-width heading "...ARIORUM NOTÆ." (Variorum notae) stands across both columns above the page-foot notes, cut off at left, not set; the Variorum notae for this page are set in n561; no editors' matter in the text block
PL 6:563
in quo necesse est doctrinae totius substantiam contineri, non defugi hunc laborem, ut implerem materiam, quam Cyprianus non executus est in ea oratione, qua Demetrianum (sicut ipse ait) oblatrantem atque obstrepentem veritati redarguere conatur: qua materia non est usus, ut debuit; non enim Scripturae testimoniis, quam ille utique vanam, fictam, commentitiamque putabat, sed argumentis et ratione fuerat refellendus. Nam cum ageret contra hominem veritatis ignarum, dilatis paulisper divinis lectionibus, formare hunc a principio tanquam rudem debuit, eique paulatim lucis principia monstrare, ne toto lumine objecto caligaret.
in which the substance of the whole doctrine must be contained, I did not shrink from this labour, so that I might fill out the material which Cyprian did not pursue in that discourse in which he tries to refute Demetrianus, barking and clamouring (as he himself says) against the truth: he did not use this material as he ought to have; for that man was to be refuted not by the testimonies of Scripture, which he certainly considered vain, feigned and fabricated, but by arguments and reason. For since he was dealing with a man ignorant of the truth, he ought, setting aside the divine readings for a little while, to have formed him from the beginning as one untrained, and gradually to have shown him the first principles of the light, so that he would not be blinded by the whole light being thrown before him at once.
Nam sicut infans solidi ac fortis cibi capere vim non potest ob stomachi teneritudinem, sed liquore lactis ac mollitudine alitur, donec, firmatis viribus, vesci fortioribus possit: ita et huic oportebat, quia nondum poterat capere divina, prius humana testimonia offerri, id est, philosophorum et historicorum, ut suis potissimum refutaretur auctoribus. Quod quia ille non fecit, raptus eximia eruditione divinarum litterarum, ut iis solis contentus esset, quibus fides constat, accessi Deo inspirante, ut ego facerem, et simul ut viam caeteris ad imitandum pararem.
For just as an infant cannot take in the strength of solid and strong food because of the tenderness of its stomach, but is nourished by the liquid and softness of milk until, its powers strengthened, it can feed on stronger things: so too it was fitting that to this man, since he could not yet take in divine things, human testimonies should first be offered, that is, those of the philosophers and historians, so that he might be refuted above all by his own authorities. Since Cyprian did not do this, carried away by his outstanding learning in the divine letters, so that he was content with these alone, in which faith consists, I have undertaken, with God inspiring me, to do it myself, and at the same time to prepare for the rest a way to imitate.
Editors' notes and page, col. 563

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). In "Tum etiam solam veram" the numeral before "mss. rec." is blurred in the scan; read as 10. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Qua Demetrianum› · col 563

Qua Demetrianum, etc. Demetrianus ille non proconsul Africae, sed minoris ordinis judex Carthaginensis. Is aiebat Christianis mala omnia esse imputanda quibus tum mundus urgebatur.

"With which Demetrianus," etc. That Demetrianus was not proconsul of Africa but a Carthaginian judge of lower rank. He used to say that all the evils by which the world was then pressed were to be laid to the Christians' charge.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Oblatrantem atque obstrepentem veritati› · col 563

Oblatrantem atque obstrepentem veritati. Haec verba sunt ipsiusmet Cypriani initio libri sui.

"Barking and shouting against the truth." These words are Cyprian's own, at the beginning of his book.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non enim Scripturae testimoniis….. sed argumentis et ratione fuerat refellendus› · col 563

Non enim Scripturae testimoniis..... sed argumentis et ratione fuerat refellendus. Longe aliter sentit Augustinus. Immerito hic Lactantius et Hieronymus sanctum Cyprianum arguunt, quod contra proconsulem Demetrianum gentilem sacrae Scripturae, seu prophetarum Hebraeorum testimonia protulerit; siquidem, ut ait Augustinus lib. XIII contra Faustum, cap. VII: Ostendimus fidem prophetarum ex iis quae ventura cecinerant, et venisse cernuntur. Et eodem libro, cap. 10: Per eorum quippe codices probamus, non a nobis tanquam de rerum eventu commonitis ista esse conscripta, sed olim in illo regno praedicta atque servata, nunc autem manifestata et impleta. Sed et cap. 2 ejusdem libri: Dicere autem non esse aptam Gentibus hebraeam prophetiam, ut credant in Christum, cum videat omnes gentes per Hebraeam prophetiam credere in Christum, ridicula insania est. Haud secus sentit antiquus auctor Tractatus contra 5 haereses, olim sub nomine Augustini, cap. 7, in Append. tom. VIII, pag. 9. Hic esto, et tu, Pagane, audi quid dicat propheta. Non mihi ego quod volui scripsi: codex in quo haec scripta leguntur, in armario Judaei habetur. Inimicus meus testis est meus; ab ipso quaere: aperi, lege, et crede.

"For he should have been refuted not by testimonies of Scripture … but by arguments and reason." Augustine thinks very differently. Lactantius and Jerome here wrongly blame Saint Cyprian for bringing the testimonies of sacred Scripture, that is, of the Hebrew prophets, against the pagan proconsul Demetrianus; for, as Augustine says, Against Faustus book XIII, chapter 7: "We have shown the trustworthiness of the prophets from the things they sang were to come, and are seen to have come." And in the same book, chapter 10: "For by their books we prove that these things were not written by us as if prompted by the outcome of events, but were long ago foretold and preserved in that kingdom, and are now made manifest and fulfilled." And also in chapter 2 of the same book: "But to say that Hebrew prophecy is not suited to the Gentiles for believing in Christ, when he sees all nations believing in Christ through Hebrew prophecy, is ridiculous madness." The ancient author of the Treatise against Five Heresies, once under Augustine's name, chapter 7, in the Appendix of volume VIII, page 9, thinks no otherwise: "Stand here, you too, pagan, and hear what the prophet says. I did not write what I wished for myself: the book in which these things are read is kept in the Jew's cupboard. My enemy is my witness; ask him: open, read, and believe."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Veritatis ignarum› · col 563

Veritatis ignarum. Negat quidem Episcopus Oxon. in sua editione ad Cypr. Demetrianum ipsum fuisse veritatis ignarum, quia saepe ad Cyprianum venerit disceptaturus de fidei capitibus; sed ipse tamen Cyprianus tribuit ipsi imperitiam, et studio magis contradicendi, quam voto discendi venisse dicit. Bun.

"Ignorant of the truth." The Bishop of Oxford, in his edition of Cyprian's To Demetrianus, does deny that Demetrianus himself was ignorant of the truth, since he often came to Cyprian to dispute on the heads of the faith; but Cyprian himself nevertheless ascribes inexperience to him and says he came more from eagerness to contradict than from desire to learn. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Monstrare› · col 563

Monstrare. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. demonstrare.

"To show." The ancient Bologna manuscript 1 has "demonstrare."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nam sicut infans› · col 563

Nam sicut infans. Hac similitudine utitur ipse Paulus I Corinth. c. III et in epistola ad Hebr. c. V, I Petr., II, 2.

"For just as an infant." Paul himself uses this simile, 1 Corinthians chapter 3 and in the Letter to the Hebrews chapter 5; 1 Peter 2:2.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ut› · col 563

Ut. Addidi ex mss. et multis impressis. Abest a mss. 1 Reg. antiq. et nonnullis editis.

"That." I have added it from the manuscripts and many printed editions. It is absent from the ancient Regius 1 and some editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ac si hortatu nostro› · col 563

Ac si hortatu nostro. Reposui Ac ex quamplurimis mss. inter quos sunt veterrimi 2 Bonon., 2 Reg. et 18 al. et edd. Is., Cellar. In 10 scriptis et 10 vulgatis est At.

"And if by our exhortation." I have restored "Ac" from very many manuscripts, among which are the very old Bologna 2 and Regius 2 and eighteen others, and the editions of Isaeus and Cellarius. In ten manuscripts and ten common editions it is "At."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ingenia… jactare› · col 564

Ingenia... jactare. Quintil. l. III. Instit. c. 1: Admiscere tentavimus aliquid nitoris, non jactandi ingenii gratia. Tacit. l. XIII Annal. c. 11 fin. Bun.

"To show off … talents." Quintilian, Institutes book III, chapter 1: "We have tried to mix in some polish, not for the sake of showing off talent." Tacitus, Annals book XIII, end of chapter 11. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Tum etiam solam veram› · col 564

Tum etiam solam veram. Haec lectio est antiquissimorum et optimorum codicum 1 Bonon., 1 Reg., Cauc., item 2 al. Reg. et 1 Colbert. In scriptis 17 rec. et 4 editis legitur: tum etiam et solam veram; in 10 mss. rec. et 5 vulgatis et solam et veram.

"Then also the only true one." This is the reading of the most ancient and best codices, Bologna 1, Regius 1, the Cauci, likewise another Regius 2 and Colbert 1. In seventeen recent manuscripts and four editions one reads "then also and the only true one"; in ten recent manuscripts and five common editions, "both the only and the true one."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Reddenda› · col 564

Reddenda. Reddere hic habet vim simplicis dare, quae vis mansit in phrasi, rationem reddere: sic l. V, c. 1: Nec causas odiorum reddere ipsi possunt. Ita Manilius l. I v. 561: Restat ut aethereos fines tibi reddere coner. Et lib. I, v. 803: Ac prius incipiam stellis quam reddere vires. His et aliis locis idem quod enarrare, referre. Bun.

"To be rendered." "Reddere" here has the force of the simple "dare" (to give), a force kept in the phrase "to render an account": so book V, chapter 1: "Nor can they themselves render the causes of their hatreds." So Manilius, book I, line 561: "It remains that I try to render to you the bounds of the ether." And book I, line 803: "And sooner than I begin to render their powers to the stars." In these and other places it means the same as "to recount, to report." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Summa virtus› · col 564

Summa virtus. Mss. rec. 2 Reg. Cant. ac edd. tres vet. Rom. et Paris. 1525, sola virtus. Haec ultima lectio magis Betuleio placet. — Quae aut ipsa est summa virtus. Quid impedit hanc generalem, sc. universalem justitiam dici summam virtutem? Recte hoc vidit Walchius illustrans ex Cic. lib. III de Off. cap. 6: Haec una virtus (justitia) omnium est domina et regina virtutum. Quid multis, ipsi Lactantio iterum hoc libro cap. 14: Justitia vocatur summa virtus, quae infra, omnes simul virtutes amplectatur. Bun.

"The highest virtue." The recent Regius 2, the Cambridge and the three old editions of Rome and Paris 1525 have "the only virtue." This last reading pleases Betuleius more. — "Which either is itself the highest virtue." What prevents this general, that is, universal justice from being called the highest virtue? Walch saw this rightly, illustrating it from Cicero, On Duties book III, chapter 6: "This one virtue (justice) is the mistress and queen of all the virtues." In short, Lactantius himself again, in this book, chapter 14: "Justice is called the highest virtue, which," as below, "embraces all the virtues together." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Aut fons est ipsa virtutis› · col 564

Aut fons est ipsa virtutis. Ita mss. 2 Reg. vetustissimi, 8 alter. Reg., 6 Colb. aliique, et 9 vet. edit. In pluribus excusis est virtus. — Aut fons est ipsa virtutis. Solus Emman. ipsa non habet; reliqui scripti editique agnoscunt ipsa, scil. justitia: iidem, virtutis. Lib. VI, cap. 9: Fons est ipse bonitatis Deus. Ibid., cap. 24: Ipsum veritatis attigit fontem. Bun.

"Or it is itself the fount of virtue." So the very old Regius 2, another Regius 8, Colbert 6 and others, and nine old editions. In several printed editions it is "virtue" (nominative). — "Or it is itself the fount of virtue." Only the Emmanuel lacks "itself"; the other manuscripts and editions recognize "itself," namely justice; the same have "of virtue." Book VI, chapter 9: "God himself is the fount of goodness." Ibid., chapter 24: "He has reached the very fount of truth." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Cessisse e terra› · col 564

Cessisse e terra. Ex 5 vet. editis. et omnibus prope mss. reposui praepositionem e, quae in nonnullis scriptis et multis impressis litterarum similitudine perierat. Vide Hesiodum in operibus, Virgilium II Georgicorum, Aratum in Phoenomenis.

"Had departed from the earth." From five old editions and almost all the manuscripts I have restored the preposition "e," which had been lost in some manuscripts and many printed editions through the likeness of the letters. See Hesiod in the Works, Virgil, Georgics II, Aratus in the Phaenomena.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ut doceant› · col 564

Ut doceant. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. ut edoceant; tres editi, ut docerent.

"That they may teach." The ancient Bologna manuscript 1 has "ut edoceant"; three editions, "ut docerent."

(lemma) ‹anchor: A Saturni temporibus› · col 564

A Saturni temporibus. Unde Saturnia regna etiam Virgilius appellavit. Hic et Graeci et Latini inter se non conveniunt, quia varios in unum confundunt Saturnos, (continues)

"From the times of Saturn." Whence Virgil too called them the Saturnian realms. Here Greeks and Latins do not agree among themselves, because they merge various Saturns into one, (continues)

(printed under page 295)

Page

  • running head: 563 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. (cut off at the right edge; column number printed with damaged first figure)
  • marginal letters: A ‹in quo necesse est doctrinae›; B ‹lactis ac mollitudine alitur›; C ‹Oblatrantem atque obstrepentem veritati› (in the Variorum Notae); D ‹gustini, cap. 7, in Append.› (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "et" in "ita et huic" and "et simul" looks like "ot" from worn type, set as et; "donec" printed with a damaged c, set as donec; last word "pa-" broken at the column break (patefacerem); the Variorum Notae at the page foot (Qua Demetrianum, etc. ...) are not set here, left for the later pass; no full-width line on this column
PL 6:564
Ac si hortatu nostro docti homines ac diserti huc se conferre coeperint, et ingenia sua vimque dicendi in hoc veritatis campo jactare maluerint, evanituras brevi religiones falsas, et occasuram esse omnem philosophiam nemo dubitaverit, si fuerit omnibus persuasum, cum hanc solam religionem, tum etiam solam veram esse sapientiam. Sed evagatus sum longius quam volebam.
And if, at our urging, learned and eloquent men begin to betake themselves hither, and choose to display their talents and their power of speaking in this field of truth, no one will doubt that the false religions will shortly vanish and that all philosophy will fall, once all have been persuaded both that this alone is religion and also that this alone is true wisdom. But I have wandered further than I wished.
CAPUT V.
Chapter V.
Quae sub Saturno erat vera justitia, hanc Jupiter fugavit.
The true justice that existed under Saturn, Jupiter put to flight.
Nunc reddenda est de justitia proposita disputatio: quae aut ipsa est summa virtus, aut fons est ipsa virtutis; quam non modo philosophi quaesierunt, sed poetae quoque, qui et priores multo fuerunt, et ante natum philosophiae nomen pro sapientibus habebantur. Hi plane intellexerunt abesse hanc a rebus humanis, eamque finxerunt offensam vitiis hominum, cessisse e terra, in coelumque migrasse; atque ut doceant, quid sit juste vivere, (solent enim praecepta per ambages dare) a Saturni temporibus, quae illi vocant aurea, repetunt exempla justitiae, narrantque in quo statu fuerit humana vita, dum illa in terra moraretur.
Now the proposed discussion of justice must be given: justice, which is either itself the highest virtue or is itself the fount of virtue; which not only the philosophers have sought, but the poets too, who were far earlier and, before the name of philosophy was born, were held to be wise men. These clearly understood that it was absent from human affairs, and they imagined that, offended by the vices of men, it had departed from the earth and migrated into heaven; and in order to teach what it is to live justly (for they are accustomed to give precepts by way of riddles), they go back to the times of Saturn, which they call golden, for examples of justice, and relate in what state human life was while it lingered on earth.
Editors' notes and page, col. 564

Page

  • running head: …TANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 564 (left part of the running head cut off at the image edge; presumably LACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT.)
  • marginal letters: A ‹rarem. Ac si hortatu›; B ‹poetae quoque, qui et priores›; C ‹morum et optimorum codicum› (in the Variorum notes); D ‹cap. 14 : Justitia vocatur› (in the Variorum notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the word-fragment "rarem." carried over from the previous column; it is not set here, the word being set whole at the end of col 563; the heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" is printed across both columns and cut off at the left edge, not set; the Variorum notes below it (Ingenia... jactare; Tum etiam solam veram; Reddenda; Summa virtus; Aut fons est ipsa virtutis; Cessisse e terra; Ut doceant; A Saturni temporibus) are left for the later pass; several faint or broken letters in the scan (Nuuc, reddeuda, cst, plano, ot) were read as Nunc, reddenda, est, plane, et; UNSURE whether "cst" is actually printed for "est"
PL 6:565
Quod quidem non pro poetica fictione, sed pro vero habendum est. Saturno enim regnante, nondum deorum cultibus institutis, nec adhuc ulla gente ad divinitatis opinionem consecrata, Deus utique colebatur. Et ideo non erant neque dissensiones, neque inimicitiae, neque bella.
This is to be taken not as a poetic fiction but as the truth. For while Saturn reigned, when the cults of the gods had not yet been instituted and no nation had yet been consecrated to the belief in a divinity, God was certainly worshipped. And therefore there were neither dissensions, nor enmities, nor wars.
Nondum vesanos rabies nudaverat enses,
Not yet had rage bared the frenzied swords,
ut Germanicus Caesar in Arataeo loquitur carmine:
as Germanicus Caesar says in his Aratean poem:
Nec consanguineis fuerat discordia nota.
Nor had discord been known among kinsmen.
Immo ne alienigenis quidem: sed neque ulli omnino gladii, qui nudarentur, fuerunt. Quis enim praesente ac vigente justitia, aut de tutela sui, cum nemo insidiaretur, aut de pernicie alterius cogitaret, cum nemo quidquam concupisceret?
Nay, not even among foreigners: indeed there were no swords at all to be bared. For while justice was present and flourishing, who would think either of protecting himself, when no one was lying in wait, or of the ruin of another, when no one coveted anything?
Malebant tenui contenti vivere cultu,
They preferred to live content with a slender way of life,
ut Cicero in suo narrat, quod est proprium nostrae religionis.
as Cicero relates in his [poem]; and this is proper to our religion.
Ne signare quidem, aut partiri limite campum / Fas erat: in medium quaerebant.
It was not lawful even to mark out or divide the field with a boundary: they sought [their gains] for the common stock.
Quippe cum Deus communem omnibus terram dedisset, ut communem degerent vitam, non ut rabida et furens avaritia sibi omnia vendicaret, nec ulli deesset quod omnibus nasceretur. Quod poetae dictum sic accipi oportet, non ut existimemus nihil omnino tum fuisse privati, sed more poetico figuratum; ut intelligamus, tam liberales fuisse homines, ut natas sibi fruges non includerent, nec soli absconditis incubarent, sed pauperes ad communionem proprii laboris admitterent.
For God had given the earth in common to all, so that they might lead a common life, not so that raging and furious avarice might claim everything for itself, and so that no one might lack what was produced for all. This saying of the poet ought to be understood thus: not that we should suppose there was then nothing private at all, but that it is expressed figuratively in the poetic manner; so that we may understand that men were so generous that they did not shut up the crops produced for them, nor brood alone over hoarded stores, but admitted the poor to a share in their own labour.
Editors' notes and page, col. 565

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). No run-over of the note "A Saturni temporibus" (p. 295) is visible at the head of this page foot; the first note here is a new lemma. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nec adhuc ulla gente› · col 565

Nec adhuc ulla gente, etc. In 27 mss. et 3 editis est illa. Melius ulla in caeteris; ad quid enim illa referri potest, cum nullius gentis supra fuerit facta mentio? Heumannus tamen fretus vetustis editionibus existimat legendum esse illa, quasi agatur de Saturni familia: sed male, ut puto.

"Nor yet with any race," etc. In twenty-seven manuscripts and three editions it is "that." "Any," in the rest, is better; for to what can "that" be referred, when no race has been mentioned above? Heumann nevertheless, relying on old editions, thinks "that" should be read, as though Saturn's family were in question; but wrongly, I think.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nondum vesanos› · col 565

Nondum vesanos: Ovidius: Non galeae, non ensis erat, sine militis usu Mollia securae peragebant otia gentes.

"Not yet the mad": Ovid: "There were no helmets, no sword; without the need of soldiers the nations, free from care, passed their days in gentle ease."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Loquitur› · col 565

Loquitur. Hoc verbum addidi ex mss. et edd. quod in nonnullis vulgatis rec. deest.

"Speaks." I have added this word from the manuscripts and editions; it is missing in some recent common editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nota› · col 565

Nota. Id observandum, quod apud Germanicum legitur nata. Sed idem fere sensus est.

"Known." It should be observed that in Germanicus "nata" (born) is read. But the sense is nearly the same.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ut Cicero in suo narrat› · col 565

Ut Cicero in suo narrat. Ita ferme omnes mss. et 7 editi. Et recte. Jam enim praecessit, ut Germanicus Caesar in Aratoeo loquitur carmine. Jun., Ultr., et 7 excusi, Ut Cicero in suo ait Arato; 1 Bonon. antiq., ut Maro in suo, etc., 1 Reg. rec., 1 Colb., Lips., Brun., ut Virgilius in suo narrat, quod. Quae Betuleius in commentario suo ad hunc locum habet, parum ad rem nostram faciunt. At Lactantius modo Germanici, modo Ciceronis Arataeorum translatione utitur.

"As Cicero tells in his." So nearly all the manuscripts and seven editions. And rightly; for there came before: "as Germanicus Caesar speaks in his Aratean poem." The Junius, the Utrecht and seven printed editions have "As Cicero says in his Aratus"; the ancient Bologna 1, "as Maro in his," etc.; the recent Regius 1, Colbert 1, the Leipzig and the Brunswick, "as Virgil tells in his, that." What Betuleius has in his commentary on this place does little for our matter. But Lactantius uses now Germanicus's, now Cicero's translation of Aratus's Phaenomena.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ne signare› · col 565

Ne signare, etc. Hic versus Maronis est, ex primo Georgic. vers. 126, quae expresse neque in Arato, neque in Hesiodo leguntur. Apud Aratum forte haec excolere voluit: Ἀλλὰ βόες ἄροτρα, καὶ αὐτὴ πότνια λαῶν Μυρία πάντα παρεῖχε δίκη δώτειρα δικαίων. Quae etiam Germanicus copiose circumlocutus est, Virgilium fortasse secutus: Divitias fructusque dabat placata colono Sponte sua tellus, nec parvi terminus agri Praestabat dominis signo tutissima rura.

"Not even to mark out," etc. This verse is Maro's, from the first Georgic, line 126; these things are not expressly read in Aratus or in Hesiod. In Aratus he perhaps meant to embellish these lines: "But oxen and ploughs, and Justice herself, mistress of peoples, giver of just things, supplied all things in countless store." Germanicus too paraphrased these at length, perhaps following Virgil: "The earth, appeased, of her own accord gave riches and fruits to the farmer, nor did the boundary of a small field by its mark secure the fields most safely for their owners."

(lemma) ‹anchor: In medium› · col 566

In medium. Id est, in commune. Ex Marone iterum libro de Ira, c. 7: In medium quaesita reponunt. Seneca Agamemn. v. 666: In medium deflere suos. Bun.

"Into the common stock." That is, in common. From Maro again, in the book On Anger, chapter 7: "They store what they have gathered into the common stock." Seneca, Agamemnon line 666: "To bewail their own in common." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nec ulli deesset› · col 566

Nec ulli deesset. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq., nec ulli datum est; Latinius, nec ulli datum esset.

"Nor would anyone lack." The ancient Bologna manuscript 1 has "nor has it been given to anyone"; Latinius, "nor would it have been given to anyone."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Omnino› · col 566

Omnino. Thysius omni, sed male.

"At all." Thysius has "omni," but wrongly.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Flumina› · col 566

Flumina. Versus est Ovid. Metamorph. I initio. Cujus vestigia nec apud Hesiodum, nec apud Aratum leguntur.

"Rivers." The verse is Ovid's, Metamorphoses I, near the beginning. No trace of it is read in Hesiod or in Aratus.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Arma› · col 566

Arma. Versus est Virg. VIII Aeneid., 320. Vide et S. Augustinum de Civit. Dei lib. VII, cap. 26.

"Arms." The verse is Virgil's, Aeneid VIII, 320. See also Saint Augustine, City of God book VII, chapter 26.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Deseruit propere terras› · col 566

Deseruit propere terras. Mss. 2 Bonon., 5 Reg. et 1 Brun. proprie; ex Germanico Caesare in Arati carminibus, ubi poeta expressit quod de ferreo saeculo expressit graece Aratus.

"She quickly abandoned the earth." Bologna 2, Regius 5 and Brunswick 1 have "proprie"; from Germanicus Caesar in his poems from Aratus, where the poet rendered what Aratus expressed in Greek about the iron age.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Cicero› · col 566

Cicero. Qui hic Hesiodum potius quam Aratum secutus est. Caeterum de aureo saeculo lege Platonem in Politico, ubi aliis cum scriptoribus convenit.

"Cicero." Who here followed Hesiod rather than Aratus. For the rest, on the golden age read Plato in the Statesman, where he agrees with other writers.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Resedit› · col 566

Resedit. Ita mss. et editi. 1 Colb. rec. residet, mendose, pro resedit, litteris transpositis. Grotius legit, recepta est.

"Settled." So the manuscripts and editions. The recent Colbert 1 has "residet," faultily, for "resedit," with the letters transposed. Grotius reads "she was received."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ille› · col 566

Ille. Versus Virg. I Georg., 139, ubi Jovem, quamvis optimum, facit auctorem mali; quo fit ut Deus non sit.

"He." The verse is Virgil's, Georgics I, 139, where he makes Jupiter, though "best," the author of evil; which means he is not God.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Insevit› · col 566

Insevit. Mss. 2 Reg. rec. et 1 Colbert. sevit; in 18 rec. et 5 excusis, inseruit. Apud Buneman inseruit. — Ut Boethius l. I Consol., p. 44: Sapientiam mentibus inseruit Deus; et l. III, Pros. II: Mentibus hominum veri boni naturaliter inserta cupiditas. Conf. not. l. VI, cap. 13. Bun.

"Sowed in." The recent Regius 2 and Colbert 1 have "sevit"; eighteen recent manuscripts and five printed editions, "inseruit." In Bünemann, "inseruit." — As Boethius, Consolation book I, page 44: "God implanted wisdom in minds"; and book III, prose 2: "The desire for the true good is naturally implanted in the minds of men." Compare the note on book VI, chapter 13. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Venenati› · col 566

Venenati. Hoc est perniciosi, pestiferi, et in hominum perniciem nati, ut Neronis, Caligulae, Domitiani, et id genus animantium. Salmasius.

"Venomous." That is, destructive, pestilent, and born for the ruin of men, like Nero, Caligula, Domitian and creatures of that kind. Salmasius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Fecerit› · col 566

Fecerit. Ms. 1 Bonon. fecerat; nonnulli editi fecit.

"May have done." Bologna manuscript 1 has "fecerat"; some editions, "fecit."

(printed under page 296)

Page

  • running head: 565 LIBER V. DE JUSTI (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹Quod quidem non pro poetica fictione›; B ‹Malebant tenui contenti vivere cultu›; C ‹admitterent.›; D ‹Caesar in Arataeo loquitur carmine. Jun., Ultr., et 7› (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at the image edge, presumably DE JUSTITIA; full-width heading VARIORUM NOTAE (cut off at the edge) stands after admitterent. and is not set; the Variorum Notae below it (Nec adhuc ulla gente ... Praestabat dominis signo tutissima rura.) are page-foot commentary left for the later pass; the verse lines Ne signare ... quaerebant set as one paragraph joined with a slash; vendicaret is kept as printed (a variant spelling)
PL 6:566
Flumina jam lactis, jam flumina nectaris ibant.
Now rivers of milk, now rivers of nectar flowed.
Nec mirum, cum promptuaria justorum benigne paterent omnibus; nec avaritia intercipiens beneficia divina, famem sitimque vulgo faceret: sed omnes aequaliter abundarent, cum habentes non habentibus large copioseque donarent. Sed postquam Saturnus a filio pulsus, in Latiumque delatus est,
And no wonder, since the storehouses of the just lay kindly open to all; nor did avarice, intercepting the divine bounties, cause hunger and thirst among the common people, but all had abundance equally, since those who had gave largely and copiously to those who had not. But after Saturn, driven out by his son, was carried down into Latium,
Arma Jovis fugiens, et reguis exsul ademptis;
fleeing the arms of Jupiter, and an exile from his kingdoms taken from him;
cum jam populus vel novi regis metu, vel sua sponte depravatus, Deum colere desiisset, regemque pro Deo habere coepisset; cum ipse propemodum parricida exemplo caeteris esset ad violandam pietatem:
when the people, corrupted either through fear of the new king or of their own accord, had now ceased to worship God and had begun to hold the king in place of God; when he himself, very nearly a parricide, was an example to the rest for violating piety:
Deseruit propere terras justissima virgo;
the most just maiden quickly forsook the earth;
sed non, ut ait Cicero:
but not, as Cicero says:
Et Jovis in regno, coelique in parte resedit.
and settled in the kingdom of Jupiter and in a region of heaven.
Quomodo enim poterat in ejus regno residere, aut commorari, qui patrem regno expulit, bello persecutus est, exsulem toto orbe jactavit?
For how could she settle or abide in the kingdom of him who drove his father from his kingdom, pursued him with war, and tossed him about as an exile over the whole world?
Ille malum virus serpentibus addidit atris,
He added baneful venom to the black serpents,
Praedarique lupos jussit:
and ordered wolves to prey:
id est, odium, et invidiam, et dolum hominibus insevit, ut tam essent, quam serpentes, venenati, tam rapaces quam lupi. Quod quidem vere faciunt ii qui justos ac fideles Deo persequuntur, dantque judicibus saeviendi adversus innoxios potestatem. Fortasse aliquid ejusmodi Jupiter fecerit, ad expunandam
that is, he implanted hatred, and envy, and guile in men, so that they should be as venomous as serpents and as rapacious as wolves. This indeed those truly do who persecute the just and those faithful to God, and give judges power to rage against the innocent. Perhaps Jupiter did something of this kind, in order to overthrow
Editors' notes and page, col. 566

Page

  • running head: [LIBE]R V. DE JUSTITIA. 566 (left part of head cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A Flumina jam lactis; B Deseruit propere terras; C Fortasse aliquid ejusmodi; D beside the notes line "expressit graece Aratus"
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "reguis" in the Virgil line set as printed (turned n), a misprint for regnis; "terrasjustissima" printed without visible space, set as two words; last word "expu-" split at the column break, its tail printed "nandam" at the top of col. 567, so the joined word "expunandam" is set as printed, a misprint for expugnandam (the English renders the intended word); full-width line "[VA]RIORUM NOTAE" stands between text and notes, not set; Variorum notes at page foot not set; left-column fragments belong to col. 565
PL 6:567
tollendamque justitiam; et idcirco efferasse serpentes, ac lupos acuisse tradatur.
and take away justice; and for that reason he is related to have made the serpents savage and to have sharpened the wolves.
Tum belli rabies, et amor successit habendi.
Then came the madness of war and the love of possessing.
Neque immerito. Sublata enim Dei religione, boni quoque ac mali scientiam perdiderunt. Sic hominibus intercidit communitas vitae, et diremptum est foedus societatis humanae. Tum inter se manus conserere coeperunt, et insidiari, et gloriam sibi ex humano sanguine comparare.
And not undeservedly. For once the worship of God had been taken away, they lost also the knowledge of good and evil. Thus the common life perished among men, and the bond of human society was broken. Then they began to come to blows among themselves, and to lay ambushes, and to win glory for themselves from human blood.
CAPUT VI.
Chapter VI.
Explosa justitia, cupiditas, iniquae leges, audacia, avaritia, ambitio, superbia, impietas, aliaque regnarunt vitia.
When justice had been driven out, greed, unjust laws, recklessness, avarice, ambition, pride, impiety and other vices reigned.
Quorum omnium malorum fons cupiditas erat: quae scilicet ex contemptu verae majestatis erupit. Non tantum enim, non participabant alios ii quibus aliquid affluebat: sed aliena quoque rapiebant, in privatum lucrum trahentes omnia, et quae antea in usus hominum etiam singuli laborabant, in paucorum domos conferebantur. Ut enim servitio caeteros subjugarent, in primis necessaria vitae subducere et colligere coeperunt, eaque firmiter conclusa servare, ut beneficia coelestia facerent sua; non propter humanitatem, quae nulla in ipsis erat, sed ut omnia cupiditatis et avaritiae instrumenta corraderent. Leges etiam sibi nomine justitiae iniquissimas injustissimasque sanxerunt quibus rapinas et avaritiam suam contra vim
The source of all these evils was greed, which indeed burst forth from contempt of the true Majesty. For not only did those who had something in abundance not share with others, but they also seized what belonged to others, dragging everything to private gain; and what formerly even individuals had laboured at for the use of men was gathered into the houses of a few. For in order to subjugate the rest to servitude, they began first of all to withdraw and collect the necessities of life and to keep them firmly shut up, so as to make the heavenly bounties their own; not out of humanity, of which there was none in them, but in order to scrape together all the instruments of greed and avarice. They also enacted for themselves, in the name of justice, most unequal and most unjust laws, by which their plunderings and their avarice, against the force
Editors' notes and page, col. 567

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). The first note is a new lemma; nothing visibly runs over from p. 296. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et idcirco efferasse› · col 567

Et idcirco efferasse. Mss. 11 rec. ideo. In 1 Reg. rec. est et ideo et feras, et serpentes, ac lupos.

"And for that reason made wild." Eleven recent manuscripts have "ideo." In the recent Regius 1 it is "and therefore both wild beasts and serpents and wolves."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Tradatur› · col 567

Tradatur. Rectius mss. 5 rec. et editi multi traditur, in quorum uno est saevisse, pro acuisse.

"Be handed down." More correctly five recent manuscripts and many editions have "traditur," in one of which "to have raged" stands for "to have sharpened."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Diremptum est foedus› · col 567

Diremptum est foedus. Diremptum, licet Taurin. et quidam alii in Epitom. cap. 59: Diruptum est... foedus.. direpta societas, praeferant; saepe enim, ut ad epitomen dico, hae voces confunduntur. Latini vero non diripere, sed dirimere foedus, societatem dicunt. Ita noster ex Cicerone l. VI, c. 6: Dirimunt hi... societatem. Bun.

"The covenant was broken off." "Diremptum," although the Turin and certain others, in the Epitome chapter 59, prefer "the covenant … was burst … the fellowship torn apart"; for these words are often confused, as I say on the Epitome. But Latin speakers do not say "diripere" but "dirimere" a covenant or a fellowship. So our author, from Cicero, book VI, chapter 6: "These break off … the fellowship." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Manus conserere› · col 567

Manus conserere. Ms. Brun. inferre; editi quinque inserere.

"To join hands in battle." The Brunswick manuscript has "inferre"; five editions, "inserere."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Omnium malorum fons cupiditas› · col 567

Omnium malorum fons cupiditas. Cupiditas est avaritia, de qua capite quinto integro egit. His gemina illa Sallustii Catil. X, c. 3: Primo pecuniae, deinde imperii cupido crevit. Ea materies omnium malorum fuere. Bun.

"Greed, the fount of all evils." Greed is avarice, of which he treated in the whole of chapter 5. Twin to these is that of Sallust, Catiline X, 3: "First the desire for money grew, then for power. These were the stuff of all evils." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non participabant alios› · col 567

Non participabant alios. Sic restitui ex mss 3 Reg. quorum duo sunt veterrimi, et ex edit. Cellarii. Scripti recentiores et editi habent aliis, quod cum participandi verbo non convenit. Omnino enim participare jungitur cum accusativo. Plautus dixit, servum participare consilii sui, Cistell. Act. I, III, vers. 17; et Cicero, participare otium alio, lib. I de Legibus n. 33. — Non participabant aliis ii. Participare alicui saepissime in antiquissima et saeculo secundo exeunte, ut Grabius et Fabricius censuere, confecta versione Irenaei l. I. Haeres., cap. 1, fol. 10. Nus excogitabat reliquis aeonibus participare magnitudinem patris. L. I. c. 9, fol. 59: Qui participavit ei suam gratiam. L. 2, c. 61, fol. 191: Anima participans suo corpori... vitam participans corpori. L. IV, c. 28, fol. 316: Gloriam suam participare volens discipulis suis. Bun.

"They did not share with others." So I have restored from Regius 3, two of which are very old, and from Cellarius's edition. The more recent manuscripts and the editions have "aliis" (dative), which does not suit the verb of sharing; for "participare" is always joined with the accusative. Plautus said "to make a slave a sharer in his plan," Cistellaria Act I, scene 3, line 17; and Cicero, "to share leisure with another," On the Laws book I, number 33. — "Those did not share with others" (dative). "Participare alicui" occurs very often in the very ancient version of Irenaeus, made at the end of the second century as Grabe and Fabricius judged, Against Heresies book I, chapter 1, folio 10: "Nous was devising to share the Father's greatness with the other aeons." Book I, chapter 9, folio 59: "Who shared his grace with him." Book 2, chapter 61, folio 191: "The soul sharing with its body … sharing life with the body." Book IV, chapter 28, folio 316: "Wishing to share his glory with his disciples." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: In usus hominum› · col 567, runs into col 568

In usus hominum. Ita omnes (quod sciam) mss. et editi. Rectius fortasse legeris omnium, quae est Isaei, Joannis Cauci et Francii conjectura. Nam omnium recte opponitur τῷ paucorum. — In usus omnium. In libris antiquis per notas hoium, id est hominum, et oium, id est omnium, scribitur: hinc facilis confusio. Agnovit jam olim interpres Gall., vertens: pour l'usage de tous hommes. Bun.

"For the uses of men." So all the manuscripts and editions (as far as I know). Perhaps you would more correctly read "of all," which is the conjecture of Isaeus, Jean Cauci and Francius. For "of all" is rightly opposed to "of the few." — "For the uses of all." In ancient books "hoium," that is "hominum," and "oium," that is "omnium," are written in abbreviations: hence the easy confusion. The French translator recognized it long ago, rendering "for the use of all men." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Corraderent› · col 568

Corraderent. Mss. 2 Reg. rec., 1 Colbert. contraderent, pro conraderent, quod est in 2 Reg. antiq. et 4 aliis; in 2 Reg. rec. et 5 editis, contraherent.

"They might scrape together." The recent Regius 2 and Colbert 1 have "contraderent," for "conraderent," which is in the ancient Regius 2 and four others; in the recent Regius 2 and five editions, "contraherent."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sibi nomine justitiae› · col 568

Sibi nomine justitiae. Sic mss. 2 Reg. antiquissimi, 1 al. Reg. et 4 edit. Et recte. Vide infra, Hinc honores sibi, et purpuras, et fasces invenerunt. Scripti 26 rec. et 12 vulgati addunt munitas; 1 Bonon. antiq. sub justitiae nomine. Attamen Thomasio assentimur qui putat sensum forte meliorem si legatur, leges etiam sub justitiae nomine iniquissimas. De his legibus vide Tertullianum in Apologetico, cap. 4.

"For themselves under the name of justice." So the very ancient Regius 2, another Regius 1 and four editions. And rightly. See below: "Hence they devised honours for themselves, and purple robes, and fasces." Twenty-six recent manuscripts and twelve common editions add "fortified"; the ancient Bologna 1, "under the name of justice." Yet we agree with Thomasius, who thinks the sense perhaps better if one reads "laws, too, most unjust under the name of justice." On these laws see Tertullian in the Apology, chapter 4.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Malitia› · col 568

Malitia. Mss. 14 rec. et vet. edd. 5, avaritia.

"Malice." Fourteen recent manuscripts and five old editions have "avarice."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Altioresque se caeteris hominibus… faciebant› · col 568

Altioresque se caeteris hominibus... faciebant. Mss. 6 Reg. et edd. 4. altioresque caeteris hominibus... fulgebant.

"And they made themselves higher than other men …" Regius 6 and four editions have "and higher than other men … they shone."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sed impiam tyrannidem vi et hominibus armatis occupavit› · col 568

Sed impiam tyrannidem vi et hominibus armatis occupavit. Mss. 1 Bon. antiq.: Sed imperium tyrannidemque hominibus, etc.

"But he seized an impious tyranny by force and armed men." The ancient Bologna 1: "But power and tyranny with men," etc.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Titanum robustam… gentem› · col 568

Titanum robustam... gentem. Mss. 13 et 5 excusi, Titanam, male, ex commutatione unius litterae. Vide supra lib. I, cap. 10 ante finem, et cap. 14.

"The sturdy … race of the Titans." Thirteen manuscripts and five printed editions have "Titanam," wrongly, from the change of one letter. See above, book I, chapter 10 before the end, and chapter 14.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Occidione deleverat› · col 568

Occidione deleverat. Ita mss. antiquissimi 2 Bonon., 1 Reg., Cant. cum 14 impressis. Scripti rec. 25 et editi 5 legunt occisione; quae magis usitata est vox, nec ideo magis genuina. Utraque vox Ciceroniana; illa Philipp. XIV, cap. ultim.; haec lib. XV, epist. 4. Sed et Tacito est occidione occumbere, XII, 38.

"Had wiped out by slaughter." So the very ancient Bologna 2, Regius 1 and the Cambridge, with fourteen printed editions. Twenty-five recent manuscripts and five editions read "occisione," which is the commoner word and not on that account the more genuine. Both words are Ciceronian: the former in Philippics XIV, last chapter; the latter in Letters book XV, letter 4. And Tacitus too has "to fall in slaughter," XII, 38.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Hunc verebantur› · col 568

Hunc verebantur. Sic lego cum 2 mss. Reg. et edit. vet. Rom, Ald., Paris. 1525, Crat., Graph., idque praecedentia et sequentia requirunt: nec video in quo differant venerabantur caeterorum, ab eo quod sequitur, huic maximum honorem deferebant; quod unum et idem est.

"Him they feared." So I read with two Regius manuscripts and the old editions of Rome, Aldus, Paris 1525, Cratander and Gryphius, and what precedes and follows requires it; nor do I see how the others' "they venerated" differs from what follows, "to him they paid the greatest honour"; which is one and the same thing.

(printed under page 297)

Page

  • running head: 567 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A nandam tollendamque justitiam; B Non tantum enim, non participabant alios ii quibus; C xerunt quibus rapinas; D fuere. BUN. (in the Variorum Notae at the page foot)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "nandam", the rest of a word broken from the previous column; the verse line "Tum belli rabies..." is printed on a line of its own and set as such; CAPUT VI. and its italic chapter summary "Explosa justitia..." are each printed on their own line and set separately; the heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" appears to run across the page and is cut off at the image edge, so it is not set; the Variorum Notae at the page foot ("Et idcirco efferasse..." to "...Nam omnium recte") are left for the later pass; "tradatur" is kept as printed, although the notes prefer "traditur"; column ends mid-sentence at "vim"
PL 6:568
multitudinis tuerentur. Tantum igitur auctoritate, quantum viribus, aut opibus, aut malitia praevalebant. Et quoniam nullum in his vestigium justitiae fuit, cujus officia sunt humanitas, aequitas, misericordia, jam superba et tumida inaequalitate gaudebant; altioresque se caeteris hominibus, satellitum comitatu, et ferro, et insigni veste faciebant. Hinc honores sibi, et purpuras, et fasces invenerunt, ut securium gladiorumque terrore subnixi, quasi jure dominorum perculsis ac paventibus imperarent. In hac conditione humanam vitam rex ille constituit, qui, debellato ac fugato parente, non regnum, sed impiam tyrannidem vi et hominibus armatis occupavit; et aureum illud justumque saeculum sustulit, coegitque homines malos et impios fieri, vel ex hoc ipso, quod ipsos avertit a Deo ad se adorandum: quod terror insolentissimae potestatis expresserat.
of the multitude, they might protect. They therefore prevailed in authority as much as they prevailed in strength, or in wealth, or in malice. And since there was in them no trace of justice, whose duties are humanity, equity and mercy, they now delighted in a proud and swollen inequality; and they made themselves higher than other men by a retinue of attendants, and by the sword, and by distinguished dress. Hence they devised for themselves honours, and purple robes, and fasces, so that, propped up by the terror of axes and swords, they might rule, as if by the right of masters, over men stricken and trembling. Into this condition that king set human life who, having vanquished and put to flight his father, seized not a kingdom but an impious tyranny by force and armed men; and he took away that golden and just age, and compelled men to become wicked and impious, even by this very thing, that he turned them away from God to worship himself: which the terror of a most insolent power had extorted.
Quis enim non metueret eum, quem arma cingebant, quem ferri et gladiorum fulgor insuetus circumdabat? aut cui parceret alieno, qui ne patri quidem suo pepercerat? Quem vero metueret, qui Titanum robustum et excellentem viribus gentem bello vicerat, occidione deleverat? Quid mirum, si omnis multitudo, insolito metu pressa, in unius adulationem concesserat? Hunc verebantur, huic honorem maximum deferebant. Et quoniam mores ac vitia regis imitari, genus obsequii judicatur, abjecerunt
For who would not fear him whom arms girded, whom an unaccustomed gleam of iron and swords surrounded? Or what stranger would he spare, who had not spared even his own father? Whom indeed would he fear, who had conquered in war the mighty race of the Titans, surpassing in strength, and had destroyed them by slaughter? What wonder, if the whole multitude, weighed down by unaccustomed fear, had yielded to the flattery of one man? Him they revered, to him they paid the highest honour. And since to imitate the morals and vices of a king is judged a kind of compliance, they cast away,
Editors' notes and page, col. 568

Page

  • running head: [LAC]TANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 568 (left edge of running head cut off by the image)
  • marginal letters: A multitudinis tuerentur; B ipso, quod ipsos avertit; C regis imitari, genus obsequii; D 6 Reg. et edd. 4. (beside the Variorum notes, not the text)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: robustum taken as a misprint, since it agrees with feminine gentem and the editors' note lemma reads "Titanum robustam... gentem"; the full-width heading "[V]ARIORUM NOTAE" is cut off at the left edge and not set, and it stands between the text and the notes; Variorum notes at the page foot are not set (later pass); column begins mid-sentence with "multitudinis" and ends mid-sentence with "abjecerunt"; no editors' matter in the text block
PL 6:569
omnes pietatem, ne exprobrare regi scelus viderentur, si pie viverent. Sic assidua imitatione corrupti, divinum fas reliquerunt; et paulatim male vivendi consuetudo mos factus est. Nec jam quidquam ex antecedentis saeculi pio atque optimo statu mansit: sed explosa justitia, et veritatem secum trahens, reliquit hominibus errorem, ignorantiam, caecitatem. Imprudentes igitur poetae, qui eam confugisse cecinerunt ad Jovis regnum. Si enim saeculo, quod vocant aureum, justitia in terra fuit, a Jove utique pulsa est, qui aureum saeculum commutavit. Saeculi autem commutatio, et expulsio justitiae, nihil aliud, ut dixi, quam desertio divinae religionis putanda est; quae sola efficit ut homo hominem carum habeat, eumque sibi fraternitatis vinculo sciat esse constrictum: siquidem pater idem omnibus Deus est, ut Dei, patrisque communis beneficia cum iis qui non habent, partiatur, nulli noceat, nullum premat, non fores claudat hospiti, non aurem precanti; sed sit largus, beneficus, liberalis, quas regias esse laudes Tullius existimavit. Haec est profecto justitia, et hoc aureum saeculum, quod Jove primum regnante corruptum, mox et ipso, et omni ejus progenie consecrata, deorumque multorum suscepto cultu, fuerat omne sublatum.
all of them, piety, so that they might not seem to reproach the king with his crime if they lived piously. Thus, corrupted by constant imitation, they abandoned divine law; and little by little the habit of living badly became custom. Nor did anything any longer remain of the pious and most excellent condition of the preceding age: but justice, driven off and drawing truth along with her, left to men error, ignorance, blindness. Unwise, then, are the poets who sang that she fled for refuge to the kingdom of Jupiter. For if in the age which they call golden justice was on earth, she was certainly driven out by Jupiter, who changed the golden age. But the change of the age and the expulsion of justice must be thought nothing other, as I have said, than the desertion of divine religion; which alone brings it about that man holds man dear and knows himself to be bound to him by the bond of brotherhood: since God is the same Father to all, so that he shares the benefits of God, the common Father, with those who do not have them, harms no one, oppresses no one, does not shut his doors to the stranger nor his ear to the one who entreats; but is generous, beneficent, liberal, which Tullius judged to be the praises proper to a king. This truly is justice, and this is the golden age, which, corrupted first when Jupiter reigned, and soon, when he himself and all his progeny had been deified and the worship of many gods taken up, had been wholly taken away.
Editors' notes and page, col. 569

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). The first note is a new lemma; nothing visibly runs over from p. 297. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Consuetudo, mos factus est› · col 569

Consuetudo, mos factus est. Contra Arnobius, II. p. 58: Fiet enim familiaris e more consuetudo. Perottus in Cornu Cop., ed. Ald. f. 653: Mos proprie diffinitur ratio vivendi consuetudine firmata. Varroni mos est institutum animi, quod sequi debet consuetudo. Bun.

"Habit has become custom." Conversely Arnobius, II, page 58: "For from custom habit will become familiar." Perotti in the Cornucopia, Aldine edition, folio 653: "Custom is properly defined as a way of living strengthened by habit." For Varro, custom is a settled disposition of the mind, which habit ought to follow. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Expulsa justitia› · col 569

Expulsa justitia. Scribo ex Lips. 2, 3, expulsa, quia sequitur inf. justitia a Jove pulsa; et expulsio justitiae; ubi tamen Bonon. explotio, quasi explosio Cap. 7, Fugatam justitiam dicit. Bun.

"Justice having been expelled." From Leipzig 2 and 3 I write "expulsa," because there follows below "justice driven out by Jove," and "the expulsion of justice"; where, however, the Bologna has "explotio," as if "explosio." In chapter 7 he says "justice put to flight." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Imprudentes igitur poetae, qui eam confugisse cecinerunt ad Jovis regnum› · col 569

Imprudentes igitur poetae, qui eam confugisse cecinerunt ad Jovis regnum. Ita mss. 10 Reg., 6 Colbert. aliique sex, et edit. 5. Scripti sex rec. et, 12 excusi, . . . cecinerunt, id est ad Jovis regnum. Rohanneus codex et ed. Sublac. sic habent: Imprudentes igitur poetae, qui eam ad coelum confugisse cecinerunt ad Jovis regnum: Sangermanensis vero legit: Imprudenter igitur poetae qui eam confugisse cecinerunt ad Jovis regnum; eligas quidquid velis.

"Unwise, then, are the poets who sang that she fled to the kingdom of Jove." So Regius 10, Colbert 6 and six others, and five editions. Six recent manuscripts and twelve printed editions have "… sang, that is, to the kingdom of Jove." The Rohan codex and the Subiaco edition have: "Unwise, then, are the poets who sang that she fled to heaven, to the kingdom of Jove"; but the Saint-Germain reads: "Unwisely, then, the poets who sang that she fled to the kingdom of Jove." Choose whichever you like.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Expulsio justitiae› · col 569

Expulsio justitiae. 1 Bonon. ant. explosio Jovis justitiae.

"The expulsion of justice." The ancient Bologna 1 has "the hissing-off of Jove's justice."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non aurem precanti› · col 569

Non aurem precanti. 1 Colbert. aurum, pro aurem; 1 Bonon. antiq. avarus, forte, pro aures.

"Not his ear to one who begs." Colbert 1 has "gold" for "ear"; the ancient Bologna 1 has "avarus," perhaps for "aures" (ears).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Largus… laudes Tullius› · col 569

Largus. . . laudes Tullius. Betuleius et Gall. dicunt, hunc locum hodie in Ciceronis monumentis non inveniri. Cellarius, forte in deperdito quodam libro. Walchius, quo loco incertum. At tres posteriores ex Isaei margine potuissent discere, locum esse ex Orat. pro Dejotaro, cap. 9: Frugi hominem dici non multum habet laudis in rege: fortem, justum,... largum, beneficum, liberalem, hae sunt regiae virtutes. Bun.

"Generous … praises, Tullius." Betuleius and Gallaeus say that this place is not found today in Cicero's surviving works. Cellarius: "perhaps in some lost book." Walch: "in what place is uncertain." But the last three could have learned from Isaeus's margin that the place is from the oration For Deiotarus, chapter 9: "To be called thrifty carries little praise in a king: brave, just, … generous, beneficent, liberal, these are kingly virtues." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quas regias esse laudes› · col 569

Quas regias esse laudes. Non negat illas regias esse: sed et hanc talem putat, quae reges non minus ornet, quam privatos, et utrisque communis sit. Francius.

"Which are kingly praises." He does not deny that they are kingly; but he holds this one to be such as adorns kings no less than private persons, and is common to both. Francius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Tullius› · col 569

Tullius. Non ex deperdito Ciceronis libro, ut putat Betuleius, ac post eum Cellarius; sed ex Orat. pro Dejotaro paulo post med., cap. 9.

"Tullius." Not from a lost book of Cicero, as Betuleius thinks, and Cellarius after him; but from the oration For Deiotarus, a little after the middle, chapter 9.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Regnante primum› · col 569

Regnante primum. Ad evitandam ambiguitatem hoc ordine edo ex Lips. 2, 3, Reimm., Rost., Ven. 1471, 1515, Paris., Crat., Gymn., Torn. 1587, 1613. Walchio, ubi Fasit., Gryph., Thomas., Gall., Spark., Cell., primum regnante. Bun.

"Reigning first." To avoid ambiguity I print it in this order from Leipzig 2 and 3, the Reimmann, the Rostock, Venice 1471, 1515, Paris, Cratander, Gymnicus, Tornaesius 1587 and 1613. Walch, where Fasitelius, Gryphius, Thomasius, Gallaeus, Sparke and Cellarius have "first reigning." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nuntium misit› · col 569, runs into col 570

Nuntium misit. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. et cum eo 5 editi rec. post nuntium, addunt suum, quod a caeteris tum scriptis, tum excusis abest. — Nuntium suum misit. Quum ex Bonon. antiquissimo Thomasius, teste Isaeo, in variis, et hic et seqq. addiderint, non debebant pronomen Cellarius et recentiores fastidire. Ita solet, e. g., lib. IV, c. 25: Quum legatum ac nuntium suum mitteret. Bun.

"He sent a messenger." The ancient Bologna manuscript 1 and with it five recent editions add "his" after "messenger," which is absent from the others, both manuscript and printed. — "He sent his messenger." Since, from the very ancient Bologna, Thomasius, on Isaeus's testimony, among the variants, added it both here and in what follows, Cellarius and the more recent editors ought not to have disdained the pronoun. So he usually writes, for example book IV, chapter 25: "When he was sending his envoy and messenger." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nec in eam multitudo universa consenserit› · col 570

Nec in eam multitudo universa consenserit. Reposui in eam ex mss. 2 Reg. et Cauc. antiquissimis, aliisque decem, et vet. editis Rom., Torn. et Soubron. Caeteri in ea. — In eam multitudo... consenserit. Lego quidem, in eam, ex Ultr., Cauc., Rost., Ven. 1471, 72, utraque 78, 93, 97, Parrh., Paris., Junt., Torn. 1587, 1613, uti lib. I, cap. 18: Si omnes in concordiam consenserint. Lib. V, cap. 13: In quam tanta hominum millia consentiant. Quintil. Decl. 12, cap. 10: Concio in unam vocem consentiat. Alteram tamen, in ea, quoque probam scias, et habent Lips., Goth., Reimm. Vide lib. IV, cap. 23: In quo... consenserit. De Ira, cap. 9: In quo priores universi... consenserant. Ibid. cap. 11: Adeo in unitate natura universa consentit. Ipse Cicero pro Sextio, cap. 51: In qua causa omnes consentiunt. Bun.

"Nor would the whole multitude have agreed to it." I have restored "in eam" (accusative) from the very ancient Regius 2 and the Cauci, and ten others, and the old editions of Rome, Tornaesius and Soubron. The rest have "in ea" (ablative). — "The multitude … agreed to it." I do read "in eam," from the Utrecht, the Cauci, the Rostock, Venice 1471, 72, both of 1478, 93, 97, Parrhasius, Paris, Junta, Tornaesius 1587 and 1613, as in book I, chapter 18: "If all agree in concord." Book V, chapter 13: "To which so many thousands of men agree." Quintilian, Declamation 12, chapter 10: "Let the assembly agree in one voice." But know that the other, "in ea," is also sound, and the Leipzig, Gotha and Reimmann have it. See book IV, chapter 23: "In which … he agreed." On Anger, chapter 9: "In which all the earlier ones … had agreed." Ibid., chapter 11: "So entirely does all nature agree in unity." Cicero himself, For Sestius, chapter 51: "In which cause all agree." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Retenta› · col 570

Retenta. Ms. Brun. reperta.

"Retained." The Brunswick manuscript has "found."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Alio loco› · col 570

Alio loco. Supra lib. II, cap. 18.

"In another place." Above, book II, chapter 18.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Explicabitur› · col 570

Explicabitur. Vide infra lib. VI, cap. 15 et 22, atque lib. de Ira Dei, cap. 15.

"Will be explained." See below, book VI, chapters 15 and 22, and the book On the Anger of God, chapter 15.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non esse perfectam, nisi exerceatur adversis› · col 570

Non esse perfectam, nisi exerceatur adversis. Intellige in hac vita mortali. Quid enim; num in beatis non est perfecta virtus? At haec non exercetur adversis.

"That it is not perfect unless exercised by adversities." Understand: in this mortal life. For what? Is virtue not perfect in the blessed? Yet it is not exercised by adversities.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Deus ergo› · col 570

Deus ergo. Post haec mss. 1 Reg. antiquiss. Cauc., Goth., Marm. et 5 editi addunt, justitiam reducturus. Pro malum, ms. Pen. habet malitiam. Quod autem dicit, non exclusit malum, id est, permisit malum. Ecce Thomasii Scholia ad hunc locum. Hujus haec verba sunt. Hae etiam voces justitiam reducturus, expungendae, quae sane ex margine videntur fuisse translatae in textum. In hoc sane capite multa videtur dicere Lactantius, quibus quodam modo auctorem mali faceret Deum. Verum si recte singula considerentur, hoc ipse non asserit. Namque aut dicit Deum non excludere malum, vel permittere ut virtus cum quo pugnet habeat, hoc etiam in loco, (continues)

"God, therefore." After these words the very ancient Regius 1, the Cauci, the Gotha, the Marmoutier and five editions add "being about to bring back justice." For "evil," the Pen. manuscript has "malice." When he says "he did not shut out evil," that is, he permitted evil. Here are Thomasius's scholia on this place; these are his words: "These words too, 'being about to bring back justice,' should be struck out; they certainly seem to have been carried into the text from the margin. In this chapter Lactantius does seem to say many things by which he would in a way make God the author of evil. But if each is rightly considered, he himself does not assert this. For he either says that God does not shut out evil, or permits it so that virtue may have something to fight with, in this place too, (continues)

(printed under page 298)

Page

  • running head: 569 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹omnes pietatem, ne exprobrare›; B ‹tum : siquidem pater idem›; C ‹in Cornu Cop., ed. Ald.› (in the Variorum Notae); D ‹cunt, hunc locum hodie› (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTA[E]" stands below the text block and is not set; the Variorum Notae at the page foot (Consuetudo, mos factus est ... Nuntium misit) are left for the later apparatus pass; "constric-/tum" joined across the line break; "fuerat" looks like "fucrat" in the scan, taken as a weak impression of e (as in "eumqne", "largns"), not a misprint; the column ends at the close of the sentence (fuerat omne sublatum.)
PL 6:570
CAPUT VII.
Chapter VII.
De Jesu adventu et fructu; atque de ejus saeculi virtutibus et vitiis.
Of the coming of Jesus and its fruit; and of the virtues and vices of His age.
Sed Deus, ut parens indulgentissimus, appropinquante ultimo tempore, nuntium misit, qui vetus illud saeculum fugatamque justitiam reduceret; ne humanum genus maximis et perpetuis agitaretur erroribus. Rediit ergo species illius aurei temporis, et reddita quidem terrae, sed paucis assignata justitia est; quae nihil aliud est, quam Dei unici pia et religiosa cultura. Sed moveat aliquem fortasse, cur si haec sit justitia, non omni humano generi sit data; nec in eam multitudo universa consenserit. Magnae hoc disputationis est, cur a Deo, cum justitiam terrae daret, sit retenta diversitas: quod et alio loco declaravi, et ubicumque oportune inciderit, explicabitur. Nunc designare id brevissime satis est: Virtutem aut cerni non posse, nisi habeat vitia contraria; aut non esse perfectam, nisi exerceatur adversis. Hanc enim Deus bonorum ac malorum voluit esse distantiam, ut qualitatem boni ex malo sciamus, item mali ex bono; nec alterius ratio intelligi, sublato altero, potest. Deus ergo non exclusit malum, ut ratio virtutis constare posset. Quomodo enim patientia vim suam nomenque
But God, as a most indulgent parent, when the last time was drawing near, sent a messenger who would bring back that old age and the justice that had been put to flight, so that the human race might not be tossed about by the greatest and unending errors. So the appearance of that golden time returned, and justice was indeed restored to the earth, but assigned to few; and it is nothing other than the pious and religious worship of the one God. But it may perhaps trouble someone why, if this is justice, it has not been given to the whole human race, and the entire multitude has not agreed upon it. It is a matter of great discussion why, when God gave justice to the earth, diversity was retained: which I have both set forth in another place, and wherever it occurs opportunely it will be explained. For now it is enough to indicate it very briefly: that virtue either cannot be discerned unless it has contrary vices, or is not perfect unless it is exercised by adversities. For God willed there to be this distinction between good and evil things, so that we might know the quality of good from evil, and likewise of evil from good; nor can the nature of the one be understood when the other has been taken away. God therefore did not exclude evil, so that the nature of virtue might be able to stand. For how could patience its force and its name
Editors' notes and page, col. 570

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left] V. DE JUSTITIA. 570
  • marginal letters: A ‹CAPUT VII.›; B ‹daret, sit retenta diversitas›; C ‹Isaeo, in variis› (in the notes); D ‹Retenta. Ms. Brun.› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width line "[V]ARIORUM NOTAE" (cut off at left edge) stands above the page-foot notes, not set; the Variorum notes themselves are left for the later pass. A stray damaged-type mark between "Sed" and "Deus" is ignored. "oportune" is set as printed (single p). Last word "no-" is split at the column break; its tail "menque" is printed at the top of col. 571, and the joined word "nomenque" is set whole here, with the English ending "its force and its name". The column's last sentence runs on into col. 571, and so the English ends mid-sentence.
PL 6:571
retineret, si nihil esset, quod pati cogeremur? Quomodo laudem mereretur devota Deo suo fides, nisi esset aliquis qui a Deo vellet avertere? Nam et ideo potentiores esse injustos permisit, ut cogere ad malum possent; ideo plures, ut virtus esset pretiosa, quae rara est. Quod quidem ipsum Quintilianus egregie ac breviter ostendit in capite obvoluto. « Nam quae, inquit, virtus esset innocentia, nisi laudem raritas dedisset? Verum quia natura sic comparatum est, ut odium, cupiditas, ira, in id, quod incubuerunt, agant caecos, supra hominem videtur culpa vacare. Alioqui si natura pares omnibus affectus dedisset, pietas nihil erat. »
retain, if there were nothing which we were compelled to suffer? How would faith devoted to its God merit praise, unless there were someone who wished to turn it away from God? For it is for this reason too that He has permitted the unjust to be more powerful, so that they might be able to compel to evil; and for this reason more numerous, so that virtue, which is rare, might be precious. This very thing Quintilian indeed shows excellently and briefly in "The Veiled Head". "For what virtue," he says, "would innocence be, had not rarity given it praise? But since it has been so arranged by nature that hatred, greed and anger drive men blind into that on which they have bent themselves, to be free of fault seems to be beyond man. Otherwise, if nature had given equal affections to all, piety was nothing."
Hoc quam verum sit, docet necessitas ipsa rationis. Si enim virtus est, malis ac vitiis fortiter repugnare, apparet sine malo ac vitio nullam esse virtutem: quam Deus ut absolutam perfectamque redderet, retinuit id quod erat ei contrarium, cum quo depugnare posset. Agitata enim malis quatientibus, stabilitatem capit; et quanto frequenter impellitur, tanto firmiter roboratur. Haec nimirum causa efficit, ut quamvis sit hominibus missa justitia, tamen aureum saeculum non esse dicatur; quia malum non sustulit, ut retineret diversitatem, quae sacramentum divinae religionis continet sola.
How true this is, the very necessity of reason teaches. For if virtue is to resist evils and vices bravely, it is apparent that without evil and vice there is no virtue; and in order that He might render it absolute and perfect, God retained that which was contrary to it, with which it could fight it out. For, shaken by evils battering it, it gains stability; and the more frequently it is driven against, the more firmly it is strengthened. This, assuredly, is the cause which brings it about that, although justice has been sent to men, yet it is not said to be a golden age; because He has not removed evil, so that He might retain the diversity which alone contains the mystery of divine religion.
Editors' notes and page, col. 571

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Deus ergo› · col 571

atque alibi cum de malis agit, nomine malorum, saepe non tam res ipsas turpes, vel turpitudinem earum intelligit, quam res adversas et naturae contrarias; ut infelices eventus, venena et similia, quae proprie et per se mala non sunt, sed quia nobis sunt noxia, vulgo mala vocantur. Idem vero quod hic ait Lactantius, dixit Ambrosius in Expositione Psalm. CXXVIII, Serm. 16; tantum quae Lactantius more vulgi vocavit mala, illa nominavit austera. Et mala, inquit Ambrosius, non creavit Deus, sed haec quae videntur nobis austera, verbera, mors et hujusmodi alia, quae propter emendationem praescripta sunt noxiorum. In malo etiam, et quovis peccato, sicut theologi, et imprimis Augustinus, lib. V, cap. 3, contra Julianum late disputat, duo considerari possunt, turpitudo ipsa et poena. Turpitudo nihil pertinet ad Deum: poenae tamen recte dicitur Deus auctor esse. Et hac quidem divisione poterit vere defendi hoc loco Lactantius, quamvis quod ante diximus, commodius videatur verbis Lactantii posse aptari. Si cui tamen videtur hic Lactantius dicere Deum simpliciter esse mali auctorem, sciat nos eam opinionem, quam maxime execrari, ac propterea hunc laborem suscipere, ut videatur ea opinio nullos auctores praeter Manichaeos habuisse. Haec Thomasius in suis ad Lactantium notis.

(continued) and elsewhere, when he treats of evils, by the name of evils he often means not so much things foul in themselves, or their foulness, as things adverse and contrary to nature, such as unhappy events, poisons and the like, which are not properly and of themselves evil, but are commonly called evils because they are harmful to us. And what Lactantius says here, Ambrose said in the Exposition of Psalm 118 (CXXVIII as printed), Sermon 16; only, what Lactantius in the common manner called evils, he named harsh things. "And God did not create evils," says Ambrose, "but these things which seem harsh to us, blows, death and other things of this kind, which are prescribed for the correction of the guilty." In evil too, and in any sin, as the theologians, and above all Augustine, Against Julian book V, chapter 3, argue at length, two things can be considered: the foulness itself and the punishment. The foulness has nothing to do with God; but God is rightly said to be the author of the punishment. And by this distinction Lactantius can truly be defended in this place, although what we said before seems to fit Lactantius's words more conveniently. If, however, anyone thinks that Lactantius here says simply that God is the author of evil, let him know that we abhor that opinion utterly, and have undertaken this labour precisely so that it may be seen that the opinion had no authors other than the Manichees." So Thomasius in his notes on Lactantius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nam et ideo› · col 571

Nam et ideo. Conjunctio et desideratur in 1 Bonon. Regio-Put. et in 3 editis.

"For also therefore." The conjunction "et" is missing in Bologna 1, the Regius-Puteanus and three editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Potentiores esse injustos› · col 571

Potentiores esse injustos. Mss. 12 rec. et edd. vet. Rom., et Ald., potiores.

"That the unjust are more powerful." Twelve recent manuscripts and the old editions of Rome and Aldus have "potiores" (better off).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quae rara est› · col 571

Quae rara est. Sic reposui ex mss. 1 Bonon. antiq., 5 Reg., 1 Clarom. a secunda manu, et edit. Gymnic. Multi habent quod; Regio-Put. quo; rec. quod raro est.

"Which is rare." So I have restored from the ancient Bologna 1, Regius 5, Clermont 1 in a second hand, and Gymnicus's edition. Many have "quod"; the Regius-Puteanus, "quo"; the recent ones, "which is rarely."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Capite obvoluto› · col 571

Capite obvoluto. Fuit hoc declamationis nomen, sed deperditae. — In capite obvoluto. Periit hoc scriptum. Obvolutum est opertum, ut lib. I, cap. 22: Obvolutam vini amphoram poni. Plaut. Mostell. II, 1: Capite obvoluto ut fugiat... fuge atque operi caput. Bun.

"With head veiled." This was the name of a declamation, but a lost one. — "On the veiled head." This writing has perished. "Obvolutum" means covered, as in book I, chapter 22: "that a covered jar of wine be set down." Plautus, Mostellaria II, 1: "That he may flee with his head veiled … flee and cover your head." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Virtus esset innocentia› · col 571

Virtus esset innocentia. Mss. 2 Bonon., 1 Reg. rec., Tax., innocentiae.

"Virtue would be innocence." Bologna 2, the recent Regius 1 and the Taxaquet have "of innocence."

(lemma) ‹anchor: In id quod incubuerunt› · col 571, runs into col 572

In id quod incubuerunt. Haec lectio est mss. antiq. 2 Bonon., 6 Reg., 5 Colb., 1 Clarom., Brun. In 4 Reg. rec., 23 Colb. est, incubuerint, quod habet etiam Buneman. — In id quod incubuerint. Bonon. Reimm., Lips. 2: In id, quod incubuerunt. Omnes vero, in id quod, pro in id, in quod; per ellipsin praepositio antecedens non repetitur. Sic Epit. 27: Ne quis in eosdem laqueos incidat, quos illi veteres inciderunt. Bun.

"Into that on which they were bent." This is the reading of the ancient manuscripts Bologna 2, Regius 6, Colbert 5, Clermont 1 and the Brunswick. In the recent Regius 4 and Colbert 23 it is "incubuerint," which Bünemann also has. — "Into that on which they may have been bent." The Bologna, the Reimmann and Leipzig 2: "into that on which they were bent." But all have "in id quod" for "in id, in quod"; by ellipsis the preceding preposition is not repeated. So Epitome 27: "Lest anyone fall into the same snares into which those men of old fell." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Culpa vacare› · col 572

Culpa vacare. Quia, juxta Hieronymum, in carne vivere praeter carnem, angelica magis vita est, quam humana. Ciceroni quidem, ut in septimo Epistolarum libro ad Marium scribit, Culpa vacare magnum solatium est. Et est sane conscientia mille testes: sed Paulus universum mortalium genus culpae subjicit. Betuleius. — Et, si dixerimus quoniam peccatum non habemus, veritas in nobis non est. (I Joan., I, 8).

"To be free of fault." Because, according to Jerome, to live in the flesh apart from the flesh is an angelic rather than a human life. For Cicero indeed, as he writes to Marius in the seventh book of the Letters, "to be free of fault is a great comfort." And conscience is truly a thousand witnesses; but Paul subjects the whole race of mortals to fault. Betuleius. — And, "if we say that we have no sin, the truth is not in us" (1 John 1:8).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Si natura pares omnibus affectus dedisset› · col 572

Si natura pares omnibus affectus dedisset. Sic emendavi ex mss. Regio-Put., 5 al. Reg., 6 Colbert., 2 Clarom., Em., Cant., Brun. et editis 11. Scripti tres totidemque vulgati, affectibus; nonnulli effectus, male.

"If nature had given equal dispositions to all." So I have corrected from the Regius-Puteanus, another Regius 5, Colbert 6, Clermont 2, the Emmanuel, the Cambridge, the Brunswick and eleven editions. Three manuscripts and as many common editions have "affectibus"; some, "effectus," wrongly.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nullam esse virtutem› · col 572

Nullam esse virtutem. 1 Bonon. antiq. nihil esse virtutem.

"That there is no virtue." The ancient Bologna 1 has "that virtue is nothing."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et quanto frequenter impellitur, tanto firmiter roboratur› · col 572

Et quanto frequenter impellitur, tanto firmiter roboratur. Sic restitui ex omnibus mss. Et sic Lactantius scripsit phrasi nonnullis scriptoribus ecclesiasticis peculiari; in editis magis usitata est quanto frequentius, tanto firmius. Sed mss. ferunt frequenter, firmiter. Ita et S. Augustinus, amoto comparativo, quod reticere amat, ait lib. II, Retractat. cap. 15, n° 6: Quae mihi quasi declamatio levis (pro levior), quam gravis confessio videtur. — Quanto frequenter... tanto firmiter. Altum de hac lectione in Spark., Cell., Walchio, Heumanno silentium; eam tamen praestant Bonon., Tax., Pen. et mss. fere omnes Isaei. Omnia satis latina sunt, modo subaudias magis. Vide Gronov. ad Livii lib. I, cap. 25, et ad Livii lib. XXXIV, cap. 4; Tacitus lib. III Annal., cap. 46: Quanto pecunia dites et voluptatibus opulentos, tanto magis imbellos Aeduos evincite; lib. XII Annal., cap. 11: Clementiamque ac justitiam, quanto ignara barbaris, tanto tolerantiora capesseret. Quod hic et alii in uno membro solum faciunt, id saepe in utroque Tertullianus, e. g. lib. I, Nation. 7: Quanto proni ad malitiam, tanto ad mali fidem opportuni estis. Bun.

"And the more often it is struck, the more firmly it is strengthened." So I have restored from all the manuscripts. And so Lactantius wrote, in a turn of phrase peculiar to some ecclesiastical writers; in the editions the commoner "the more frequently, the more firmly" is found. But the manuscripts have "frequenter, firmiter." So too Saint Augustine, dropping the comparative, which he likes to leave unsaid, says in the Retractations book II, chapter 15, number 6: "Which seems to me rather a light (for lighter) declamation than a weighty confession." — "The more often … the more firmly." There is deep silence on this reading in Sparke, Cellarius, Walch and Heumann; yet the Bologna, the Taxaquet, the Pen. and almost all Isaeus's manuscripts give it. All of it is Latin enough, provided you understand "magis" (more). See Gronovius on Livy book I, chapter 25, and on Livy book XXXIV, chapter 4; Tacitus, Annals book III, chapter 46: "The richer the Aedui are in money and the more abounding in pleasures, the more unwarlike: conquer them"; Annals book XII, chapter 11: "That he should take up clemency and justice, the more tolerable the less known they were to barbarians." What he and others do here in one member only, Tertullian often does in both, for example To the Nations book I, 7: "The more prone you are to malice, the readier you are to believe evil." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Collocate› · col 572

Collocate. Mss. 12 rec. et 6 editi, Constituite, (continues)

"Place." Twelve recent manuscripts and six editions have "Establish," (continues)

(printed under page 299)

Page

  • running head: 571 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹menque retineret, si nihil esset›; B ‹apparet sine malo ac vitio›; C ‹infelices eventus, venena› (in the notes); D ‹terea hunc laborem suscipere› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: first word "menque" is the end of a word broken from the column before (apparently nomenque); "nihil", "pretiosa", "ipsum Quintilianus" look like nihll/pretlosa/Ipsum Quln- in the scan, read as worn i, not misprints; full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" across the page (cut off at right edge) not set; the editors' Variorum notae at the page foot (begins "atque alibi cum de malis agit") left for the later pass; the cut-off text at the right edge belongs to the next column and is not set
PL 6:572
CAPUT VIII.
Chapter VIII.
De justitia omnibus nota ac non suscepta; de vero Dei templo, atque de ejus cultu, ut cuncta conterantur vitia.
Of justice, known to all yet not taken up; of the true temple of God, and of His worship, that all vices may be crushed.
Qui ergo putant justum esse neminem, ante oculos habent justitiam, sed eam nolunt cernere. Quid est enim, cur illam vel in carminibus, vel in omni sermone describant, conquerentes ejus absentiam, cum sit facillimum bonos esse si velint? Quid vobis inanem justitiam depingitis, et optatis cadere de coelo, tanquam in aliquo simulacro figuratam? Ecce in conspectu vestro est: suscipite, si potestis, eamque in domicilio vestri pectoris collocate; nec difficile, aut alienum a temporibus existimetis. Estote aequi ac boni; et sequetur vos sua sponte justitia, quam quaeritis. Deponite omnem malam cogitationem de cordibus vestris; et statim vobis illud tempus aureum revertetur: quod aliter consequi non potestis, quam si Deum verum colere coeperitis. Vos autem, manente cultu deorum, justitiam desideratis in terra; quod fieri nullo pacto potest: sed ne tum quidem potuit, cum putatis; quia nondum natis diis istis, quos impie colitis, necesse est unius Dei cultum fuisse per terram: ejus scilicet qui execratur malitiam,
Those, therefore, who think that no one is just have justice before their eyes, but are unwilling to look upon it. For what reason is there why they describe it either in poems or in every kind of discourse, lamenting its absence, when it is most easy to be good if they wish? Why do you paint for yourselves an empty justice, and wish it to fall from heaven, as though fashioned in some image? Behold, it is in your sight: take it up, if you can, and place it in the dwelling of your breast; and do not think it difficult, or foreign to the times. Be fair and good; and the justice which you seek will follow you of its own accord. Lay aside every evil thought from your hearts; and at once that golden age will return to you: which you cannot attain otherwise than if you begin to worship the true God. But you, while the worship of the gods remains, desire justice on earth; which can by no means come about: but not even at that time could it, when you suppose; because, when these gods whom you impiously worship were not yet born, the worship of the one God must have existed throughout the earth: namely of Him Who curses wickedness,
Editors' notes and page, col. 572

Page

  • running head: [LAC]TANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 572 (left edge of the running head cut off by the image)
  • marginal letters: A CAPUT VIII.; B ac boni; et sequetur vos; C tecedens non repetitur (Variorum notae); D peculiari; in editis magis (Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 6:573
exigitque bonitatem; cujus templum est, non lapides, aut lutum, sed homo ipse, qui figuram Dei gestat. Quod templum non auri et gemmarum donis corruptibilibus, sed aeternis virtutum muneribus ornatur. Discite igitur (si quid vobis reliquae mentis est) homines ideo malos et injustos esse, quia dii coluntur; et ideo mala omnia rebus humanis quotidie ingravescere, quia Deus hujus mundi effector et gubernator derelictus est; quia susceptae sunt, contra quam fas est, impiae religiones; postremo, quia ne coli quidem, vel a paucis, Deum sinitis.
and demands goodness; Whose temple is not stones or clay, but man himself, who bears the figure of God. And this temple is adorned not with corruptible gifts of gold and gems, but with the eternal endowments of the virtues. Learn therefore (if you have any mind left) that men are wicked and unjust for this reason, that gods are worshipped; and that all evils grow heavier upon human affairs day by day for this reason, that God, the Maker and Governor of this world, has been forsaken; that impious religions have been taken up, contrary to what is right; finally, that you do not allow God even to be worshipped, even by a few.
Quod si solus Deus coleretur, non essent dissensiones et bella, cum scirent homines unius se Dei filios esse; ideoque divinae necessitudinis sacro et inviolabili vinculo copulatis, nullae fierent insidiae, cum scirent cujusmodi poenas Deus animarum interfectoribus praepararet, qui clandestina scelera, et ipsas etiam cogitationes pervidet. Non essent fraudes, neque rapinae, si Deo praecipiente didicissent, et suo, et parvo esse contenti, ut fragilibus, et caducis, solida
But if God alone were worshipped, there would be no dissensions and wars, since men would know that they are sons of one God; and so, being joined by the sacred and inviolable bond of divine kinship, no plots would be laid, since they would know what kind of punishments God was preparing for the slayers of lives, He Who sees through hidden crimes and even thoughts themselves. There would be no frauds nor robberies, if at God's command they had learned to be content both with their own and with little, so that they would prefer to frail and perishable things solid
Editors' notes and page, col. 573

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). No run-over of "Collocate" (p. 299) is visible at the head of this page foot; the first note here is a new lemma. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non lapides, aut lutum› · col 573

Non lapides, aut lutum. Mss. Brun. non lapis, aut lutum.

"Not stones, or mud." The Brunswick manuscript has "not stone, or mud."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non auri et gemmarum donis› · col 573

Non auri et gemmarum donis. Sequor mss. antiquiores 6 Reg., 4 Colbert. Scripti 8 rec. et editi ferunt auro.

"Not with gifts of gold and gems." I follow the older manuscripts, six Regii and four Colbertine. Eight recent manuscripts and the editions have "with gold."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ornatur› · col 573

Ornatur. Nonnulli editi, ornetur.

"Is adorned." Some editions have "ornetur."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Discite› · col 573

Discite. Ita reposui ex quamplurimis editis ex omnibus mss. praeter 1 Reg. rec. qui habet a prima manu Disce, ut in quibusdam impressis.

"Learn." So I have restored from very many editions and from all the manuscripts except one recent Regius, which has "Disce" (singular) in the first hand, as in some printed editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Si quid vobis reliquae mentis est› · col 573

Si quid vobis reliquae mentis est. Walchius, reliqua, inquit, mens, quae hominibus post lapsum relicta fuit. Mihi valent haec eadem, ac l. I, c. 21: Si habetis aliquid sanitatis; lib. V, c. 3: Si quid vobis cordis est; ibid. c. 9: Si quid sapitis. Heumannus, pro reliquae, scribit reliquum: sed non est opus ab lectione omnium librorum abire. Ita Prudentius Cathemer. XI, 94, 95: Si quidquam tibi mentis resedit integrae. Burmannus ex Suetonii Tiber. c. 62: Classiariorum manu elidente cadavera, nec cui residui spiritus quidquam inesset. Bun.

"If you have any mind left." Walch says: the remaining mind, that which was left to men after the Fall. To me these are worth the same as book I, chapter 21: "If you have any soundness"; book V, chapter 3: "If you have any heart"; ibid. chapter 9: "If you have any sense." Heumann writes "reliquum" for "reliquae"; but there is no need to depart from the reading of all the books. So Prudentius, Cathemerinon XI, 94–95: "If anything of a sound mind has stayed with you." Burman, from Suetonius, Tiberius chapter 62: "The marines' hands crushing the bodies, nor was there anyone with any breath left in him." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et injustos esse, quia dii coluntur› · col 573

Et injustos esse, quia dii coluntur. Crimen objectorum malorum impietatisque bene retorquet in nationes. Turtull. Apolog. cap. 41: Vos igitur importuni rebus humanis, vos rei publicorum incommodorum, vos malorum illices semper, apud quos Deus spernitur, statuae adorantur. Cyprian. ad Demetrian.: Quando ea fiunt quae iram Dei indignantis ostendunt, non propter nos fiunt, a quibus Deus colitur; sed delictis et meritis vestris irrogantur, a quibus Deus omnino nec quaeritur, nec timetur. Elmenhorst.

"And that they are unjust because gods are worshipped." He neatly turns back on the nations the charge of the evils and impiety laid against us. Tertullian (printed "Turtull."), Apology chapter 41: "It is you, then, who are a burden to human affairs, you who are guilty of the public misfortunes, you who are always luring evils on, among whom God is despised and statues are adored." Cyprian, To Demetrianus: "When those things happen which show the wrath of an indignant God, they happen not because of us, by whom God is worshipped, but are inflicted for your offences and deserts, by whom God is neither sought at all nor feared." Elmenhorst.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ideo mala…. ingravescere› · col 573

Ideo mala.... ingravescere. Legit vestigia Cypriani adv. Demetrianum. Objiciebant Gentiles Christianos esse omnium malorum causas. Talia ut refutarent, Arnobius suos libros contra Gentiles, et Augustinus opus de Civitate Dei, et Orosius Historiam suam scripsit. Bun.

"That evils therefore … grow heavier." He treads in the footsteps of Cyprian against Demetrianus. The Gentiles alleged that the Christians were the causes of all evils. To refute such charges Arnobius wrote his books Against the Gentiles, Augustine his work On the City of God, and Orosius his History. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Copulatis› · col 573

Copulatis. Sine ulla interpunctione. Sic restitui ex mss. 7 Reg. inter quos duo sunt vetustissimi, ex 4 Colbert. multisque aliis, et vet. edit. Rom. Scripti 7 rec. et plurimi editi habent copulatos.

"Joined." Without any punctuation. So I have restored from seven Regii, among which two are very old, from four Colbertine and many others, and the old Rome edition. Seven recent manuscripts and very many editions have "copulatos."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Praepararet› · col 573

Praepararet. Ita reposui ex mss. Regio-Put. et quamplurimis aliis, et vet. editis Rom. favente 1 alio Reg. antiquissimo, in quo legitur praepararit; in 4 Reg. rec., 2 Colbert. et 9 excusis, praeparet.

"Was preparing." So I have restored from the Regius-Puteanus and very many others, and the old Rome editions, with the support of one other very ancient Regius, in which "praepararit" is read; in four recent Regii, two Colbertine and nine printed editions, "praeparet."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Pervidet› · col 573, runs into col 574

Pervidet. Sic restitui ex mss. maximo numero, ac 2 vet. edit. Rom. Hoc verbo passim utitur Lactantius; et congruentius est, quam videt manuscriptorum sex et impressorum octo. Hoc probant voces clandestina; item cogitationes.

"Sees through." So I have restored from the greatest number of manuscripts and the two old Rome editions. Lactantius uses this verb throughout; and it is more fitting than the "sees" of six manuscripts and eight printed editions. The words "secret" and "thoughts" prove it.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ut fragilibus› · col 574

Ut fragilibus. Addidi ut ex 6 editis cunctisque mss. praeter 1 Colbert. et 1 Clarom., in quibus et in 9 vulgatis desideratur. Et ibidem pro praeferrent, Francius ad oram sui Lactantii legebat praeferre.

"As frail." I have added "as" from six editions and all the manuscripts except one Colbertine and one Clermont, in which, and in nine common editions, it is missing. And in the same place, for "praeferrent," Francius in the margin of his Lactantius read "praeferre."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Foeminam…. quaerat› · col 574

Foeminam.... quaerat. Ms. Brun. et edit. Betul. foeminas... quaerant.

"A woman … should seek." The Brunswick manuscript and Betuleius's edition have "women … should seek" (plural).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Mares libidinem continerent› · col 574

Mares libidinem continerent. Genuina lectio a me restituta ex edit. Betul. et Cellar. cunctisque mss. praeter 2 Reg. rec. quibus, ac caeteris excusis, est contemnerent.

"Men would restrain their lust." The genuine reading, restored by me from the editions of Betuleius and Cellarius and all the manuscripts except two recent Regii, in which, as in the other printed editions, it is "would despise."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Religiosa collatio› · col 574

Religiosa collatio. Id est collectae eleemosynae.

"A religious collection." That is, alms collected.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non essent igitur, ut dixi› · col 574

Non essent igitur, ut dixi. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. et 5 edit. rec. Nec essent mutua, ut dixi; inepte.

"There would not be, then, as I said." One ancient Bologna manuscript and five recent editions have "Nor would there be mutual, as I said"; absurdly.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Si ab omnibus› · col 574

Si ab omnibus. Ex cunctis pene mss. restitutum. In 2 Reg. rec. 3 Colbert. et editis 16, si ab hominibus.

"If by all." Restored from almost all the manuscripts. In two recent Regii, three Colbertine and sixteen editions, "if by men."

(lemma) ‹anchor: In legem Dei conjuraretur› · col 574

In legem Dei conjuraretur. Id est, conspiraretur, seu, ut Gallaeus et Francius volunt, juraretur. Vox enim conjurare plerumque in malam partem accipitur a scriptoribus. Lactantius igitur proprie voluit accipere pro simul jurare; atque alludit ad priscum illum morem, quo sancti viri Judaeos juramento obstringebant, se servaturos Dei legem, nec ab illa ullo modo deflexuros. Talis conjuratio bona et laudabilis. Gallaeus. — Attamen non discedendum a consensu omnium scriptorum et editorum. Nam licet plerumque in malam partem sumatur, Servius tamen ad Virg. VIII Aen. 5: Notandum, inquit, de re bona conjurationem dici posse. Notum illud Claudiani de III, Consul. Honorii, pag. 96, 98: O nimium dilecte Deo, cui militat aether, Et conjurati veniunt ad classica venti.

"If men swore together to the law of God." That is, conspired, or, as Gallaeus and Francius would have it, swore. For the word "conjurare" is mostly taken in a bad sense by writers. Lactantius therefore meant it properly, for "to swear together"; and he alludes to that ancient custom by which holy men bound the Jews by oath to keep God's law and in no way to turn aside from it. Such a sworn league is good and praiseworthy. Gallaeus. — Yet one should not depart from the agreement of all manuscripts and editions. For although it is mostly taken in a bad sense, Servius on Virgil, Aeneid VIII, 5, says: "Note that a sworn league can be spoken of in a good matter." Well known is that line of Claudian on the Third Consulship of Honorius, page 96, 98: "O you too beloved of God, for whom the sky does battle, and the winds come sworn together to the trumpet call."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Moraretur› · col 574

Moraretur. Ni Lactantius sic loqui amaret, ut jam annotavi, lubenter cum Francio scriberem morarentur: quod contra mss. et editorum fidem facere non audeo.

"Would dwell." Were it not that Lactantius likes to speak so, as I have already noted, I would gladly write "morarentur" (plural) with Francius; but I do not dare to do this against the authority of the manuscripts and editions.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Tam multis› · col 574

Tam multis. Jamdiu dixerunt cordati ac sapientes, multas leges argumentum esse corruptorum in Repub. morum. Unde Cicero II de Officiis, et Sallustius dixerunt, ex malis moribus bonas nasci leges.

"So many." Sensible and wise men have long said that many laws are a proof of corrupt morals in a commonwealth. Hence Cicero, On Duties II, and Sallust said that good laws are born of bad morals.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Praesidum› · col 574

Praesidum. Qui provinciis praeerant.

"Of governors." Those who were set over the provinces.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ultro ad justitiae opera homines erudiret› · col 574

Ultro ad justitiae opera homines erudiret. Praepositionem ad ex mss. et excusis addidi, quae deest uni Bononiensi antiq. et editis quinque. Vide infra cap. 10, erudiantur ad injustitiam; et cap. 11 ad finem, Ad haec opera cultores suos erudiunt.

"Would of its own accord train men to the works of justice." I have added the preposition "ad" from the manuscripts and printed editions; it is missing in the one ancient Bologna manuscript and five editions. See below, chapter 10, "they are trained to injustice"; and chapter 11 near the end, "to these works they train their worshippers."

(printed under page 300)

Page

  • running head: 573 LIBER V. DE JUSTI (cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A tiam, exigitque bonitatem; B cum scirent cujusmodi poenas / fectoribus (letter sits between these two lines); C Si quid vobis reliquae mentis est (in the notes); D vestris irrogantur (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the tail "tiam" of a word broken from the previous column; per the join rule the word stands whole at the end of col 572 and the tail is not set here (the text here opens at "exigitque"). Last word "so-" hyphenated across the column break, set whole as "solida" here. Full-width heading VARIORUM NOT[AE] printed across both columns below the text, cut off at the edge, not set. The Variorum notae at the page foot (Non lapides, aut lutum... through Pervidet...) not set, reserved for a later pass. Placement of B is UNSURE.
PL 6:574
et aeterna praeferrent. Non essent adulteria, et stupra, et mulierum prostitutiones, si omnibus notum esset, damnari a Deo quidquid appetitur ultra generandi cupiditatem. Nec foeminam necessitas cogeret pudorem suum profanare, ut victum sibi obscoenissimum quaerat; cum et mares libidinem continerent, et habentium pia et religiosa collatio non habentibus subveniret. Non essent igitur, ut dixi, haec omnia in terris mala, si ab omnibus in legem Dei conjuraretur; si ab universis fierent, quae unus noster populus operatur. Quam beatus esset, quamque aureus humanarum rerum status, si per totum orbem mansuetudo, et pietas, et pax, et innocentia, et aequitas, et temperantia, et fides moraretur! Denique ad regendos homines non opus esset tam multis et tam variis legibus, cum ad perfectam innocentiam Dei lex una sufficeret; neque carceribus, neque gladiis praesidium, neque terrore poenarum, cum praeceptorum coelestium salubritas humanis pectoribus infusa, ultro ad justitiae opera homines erudiret. Nunc
and eternal things. There would be no adulteries, and debaucheries, and prostitutions of women, if it were known to all that whatever is sought beyond the desire of begetting is condemned by God. Nor would necessity compel a woman to profane her modesty, so as to seek for herself a most obscene livelihood; since the males too would restrain their lust, and the pious and religious contribution of those who have would relieve those who have not. There would not, therefore, as I have said, be all these evils on earth, if all were to swear together to the law of God; if those things were done by all which our people alone performs. How blessed, and how golden, would be the condition of human affairs, if throughout the whole world gentleness, and piety, and peace, and innocence, and equity, and temperance, and faith were to dwell! Finally, for governing men there would be no need of so many and such various laws, since the one law of God would suffice for perfect innocence; nor of prisons, nor of the swords of governors, nor of the terror of punishments, since the wholesomeness of the heavenly precepts, poured into human hearts, would of its own accord train men to the works of justice. Now
Editors' notes and page, col. 574

Page

  • running head: R V. DE JUSTITIA. 574 (left part of the running head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹lida et aeterna praeferrent›; B ‹multis et tam variis legibus›; C ‹restituta ex edit. Betul.› (in the Variorum Notae, not set); D ‹Virg. VIII Aen. 5› (in the Variorum Notae, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "lida", the end of "so-lida" broken from the previous column; ends with "Nunc" mid-sentence. "praesidium" read as printed, though the editors' note lemma has "Praesidum" (glossed "qui provinciis praeerant"), so it is treated as a misprint and translated as "of governors"; UNSURE. Stray mark before "et" in line 1 ignored. VARIORUM NOTAE at the page foot (from "et impressorum octo" to "Ad haec opera cultores suos erudiunt") not set (later pass). Digitization stamp at the foot not set.
PL 6:575
autem mali sunt ignoratione recti ac boni. Quod quidem Cicero vidit; disputans enim de legibus: « Sicut una, inquit, eademque natura mundus omnibus partibus inter se congruentibus cohaeret ac nititur: sic omnes homines inter se natura confusi, pravitate dissentiunt; nec se intelligunt esse consanguineos, et subjectos omnes sub unam eamdemque tutelam: quod si teneretur, deorum profecto vitam homines viverent. » Universa igitur mala, quibus humanum genus seipsum invicem conficit, injustus atque impius deorum cultus induxit. Nec enim poterant retinere pietatem, qui communem omnium patrem Deum tanquam prodigi ac rebelles liberi abnegassent.
however, they are evil through ignorance of what is right and good. This indeed Cicero saw; for, discussing the laws, he says: « Just as the world, being of one and the same nature, holds together and rests upon itself with all its parts in harmony with one another, so all men, though by nature mingled together, are at variance through depravity; nor do they understand that they are kinsmen of one blood, and all placed under one and the same protection: and if this were held fast, men would surely live the life of the gods. » All the evils, therefore, by which the human race destroys itself, one against another, the unjust and impious worship of the gods has brought in. For those could not retain piety who, like prodigal and rebellious children, had disowned God, the common Father of all.
CAPUT IX.
Chapter IX.
De sceleribus impiorum, et Christianorum cruciatibus.
On the crimes of the impious, and the tortures of the Christians.
Nonnunquam tamen sentiunt se malos esse, et veterum saeculorum statum laudant, et de suis moribus meritisque conjectant abesse justitiam: quam obversantem oculis suis non tantum non suscipiunt, nec agnoscunt, verum etiam violenter oderunt, et persequuntur, et exterminare contendunt. Fingamus hanc interim non esse justitiam, quam nos sequimur: quomodo, si illa venerit, quam veram putant, eam recipient, qui laniant et occidunt eos, quos et ipsi fatentur imitatores esse justorum, quia bona operentur et justa; cum, si tantummodo malos occiderent, digni essent ad quos justitia non veniret, cui nulla fuit alia causa linquendi terram, quam humani cruoris effusio. Quanto magis, cum pios interficiant, et ipsos justitiae sectatores pro hostibus ducant; immo vero plus quam pro hostibus? quibus, utique cum animas eorum, et opes et liberos ferro et igni appetant, tamen parcitur victis; et est locus inter arma clementiae: aut si adeo saevire placuit, nihil plus in
Sometimes, however, they perceive that they are evil, and they praise the condition of former ages, and from their own morals and deserts they infer that justice is absent: yet when it is set before their eyes, they not only do not take it up, nor acknowledge it, but even hate it violently, and persecute it, and strive to drive it out. Let us suppose for the moment that this justice which we follow is not justice: how will they receive that one, if it should come, which they think true, who mangle and kill those whom they themselves admit to be imitators of the just, because they do good and just works; since, if they killed only the wicked, they would deserve that justice should not come to them, which had no other cause for leaving the earth than the shedding of human blood? How much more, when they slay the pious, and regard the very followers of justice as enemies; nay rather, as more than enemies? For enemies, although men assail their lives, and their wealth and children, with sword and fire, are nevertheless spared when vanquished; and there is a place for clemency amid arms: or if it has pleased them to rage so far, nothing more against
Editors' notes and page, col. 575

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). The first note is a new lemma; nothing visibly runs over from p. 300. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Mali sunt› · col 575

Mali sunt. Ms. Cantabrig. et 6 vet. edit. perperam addunt homines.

"Are evil." The Cambridge manuscript and six old editions wrongly add "men."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Disputans enim› · col 575

Disputans enim. Mss. Goth., 1 Lips., Brun., disputans valide, omisso enim.

"For, arguing." The Gotha, Leipzig 1 and the Brunswick have "arguing forcefully," omitting "for."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sicut una› · col 575

Sicut una, etc. Non extat hic locus, neque in libris de Legibus, nec in aliis Ciceronis operibus. Hinc et aliunde conjicere est truncatos esse ac multum depravatos Ciceronis libros.

"As one," etc. This place does not survive, either in the books On the Laws or in Cicero's other works. From this and elsewhere one may conjecture that Cicero's books are mutilated and much corrupted.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sub unam eamdemque tutelam› · col 575

Sub unam eamdemque tutelam. Mss. 6 rec., sub una eademque tutela.

"Under one and the same protection" (accusative). Six recent manuscripts have it in the ablative.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Deorum profecto vitam homines viverent› · col 575

Deorum profecto vitam homines viverent. Mss. 16 rec. et 5 edit. habent, deorum profecto vita homines viverent. At ipsa phrasis est inter Ciceronis fragmenta lib. I de Legibus, deorum profecto vitam omnes viverent. Et Cic. Orat. 4 Verrin., n. 118: Tutiorem vitam sese meo praesidio victuros esse arbitrantur. Caeterum homines in omnes, contra omnium Lactantianorum codicum fidem, mutare nolui. Et Lactantius noster alibi quoque dixit lib. I, cap. 14: Agrestem vitam vivebant, lib. VII, cap. 24: Vivent homines tranquillissimam et copiosissimam vitam; et lib. de Ira Dei, cap. 7: Vitam pecudum sub humana specie vivet.

"Men would surely live the life of gods." Sixteen recent manuscripts and five editions have "men would surely live by the life of gods." But the phrase itself is among Cicero's fragments, On the Laws book I: "all would surely live the life of gods." And Cicero, fourth Verrine oration, number 118: "They think they will live a safer life under my protection." For the rest, I was unwilling to change "men" into "all," against the authority of all the codices of Lactantius. And our Lactantius said elsewhere too, book I, chapter 14: "They lived a rustic life"; book VII, chapter 24: "Men will live a most tranquil and most plentiful life"; and On the Anger of God, chapter 7: "He will live the life of cattle under a human form."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Interim› · col 575

Interim. Mss. 5 rec. et vet. edit. Rom. iterum.

"Meanwhile." Five recent manuscripts and the old Rome edition have "again."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quia bona operentur› · col 575

Quia bona operentur. Sic lego cum antiquioribus mss. 5 Reg. pluribusque aliis, et 9 editis vet. In 3 scriptis rec. est, qui bona operentur; in 5 rec. et 7 vulgatis, quia bona operantur; in 2 excusis qui.

"Because they do good works." So I read with the older manuscripts, Regius 5 and several others, and nine old editions. In three recent manuscripts it is "who do good works"; in five recent ones and seven common editions, "because they do good works" (indicative); in two printed editions, "who."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Tamen parcitur victis› · col 575, runs into col 576

Tamen parcitur victis, etc. Augustinus in 1 cap. lib. I, de Civ. Dei conqueritur civitatem Christi, quae Ecclesia est, exulare in hoc mundo, et affligi ab iis ipsis, quorum ars, secundum poetam, et laus peculiaris, Parcere subjectis, et debellare superbos. (Virgil. VI Aeneid., v. 853.) Et in altero cap. aliquot exemplis docet, nulla unquam bella fuisse gesta, ut victis victores parcerent.

"Yet the conquered are spared," etc. Augustine, in the first chapter of City of God book I, complains that the city of Christ, which is the Church, is an exile in this world and is afflicted by the very people whose art and special glory, according to the poet, is "to spare the subdued and to war down the proud" (Virgil, Aeneid VI, line 853). And in the next chapter he shows by several examples that no wars were ever waged in which the victors spared the conquered.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Inter arma› · col 576

Inter arma. Vide Cicer. Orat. pro Marcello.

"Amid arms." See Cicero's oration For Marcellus.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Lupi› · col 576

Lupi. Vide Virg. II Aeneid., 356.

"Wolves." See Virgil, Aeneid II, 356.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Dicamus› · col 576

Dicamus? Ita omnes mss. et editi, praeter 1 Colbert. et 3 edit. quibus est dicemus?

"Are we to say?" So all the manuscripts and editions, except Colbert 1 and three editions, which have "shall we say?"

(lemma) ‹anchor: Veritas› · col 576

Veritas. Terent. Andr. act. I, scen. 1. Hoc ait Sosias libertus.

"Truth." Terence, Andria act I, scene 1. The freedman Sosia says this.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Divino spiritu instinctus› · col 576

Divino spiritu instinctus. Mss. 8 rec. et edit. 4, instructus; caeteri instinctus.

"Inspired by a divine spirit." Eight recent manuscripts and four editions have "instructus" (equipped); the rest, "instinctus."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Graves… putant› · col 576

Graves... putant. Plane geminus est locus lib. V, cap. 21: Persequuntur (sanctos et justos viros), quos sibi graves sentiunt... ut... auferant omnino de terra ne sint qui possint eorum nequitiam coercere.

"They think … burdensome." The place in book V, chapter 21, is plainly its twin: "They persecute (holy and just men), whom they feel to be burdensome to them … so as to … remove them wholly from the earth, that there may be none who can restrain their wickedness."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Tanquam vita eorum coarguatur› · col 576

Tanquam vita eorum coarguatur. Conf. ad rem, c. 6. Sulp. c. Sever. lib. II, cap. 28: Semper inimica virtutis vitia sunt, et optimi quique ab improbis quasi exprobrantes adspiciuntur. Seneca de Vita Beata, c. 19: Expedit vobis neminem videri bonum, quasi aliena virtus exprobratio delictorum vestrorum sit. Bun.

"As if their life were convicted." Compare on the matter chapter 6. Sulpicius Severus, book II, chapter 28: "Vices are always hostile to virtue, and all the best men are looked on by the wicked as if they were reproaching them." Seneca, On the Happy Life, chapter 19: "It suits you that no one should seem good, as if another's virtue were a reproach of your offences." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quibus coram male vivere pudet› · col 576

Quibus coram male vivere pudet. Ita omnes prope (continues)

"Before whom one is ashamed to live badly." So almost all (continues)

(printed under page 301)

Page

  • running head: 575 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. I[NSTIT.] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A autem mali sunt ignoratione; B De sceleribus impiorum; C ipsos justitiae sectatores; D beside the Variorum notae (Sub unam eamdemque tutelam), not in the text block
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins and ends mid-sentence; worn type gives pravitatc, eamdemquc, cos, essc, set as pravitate, eamdemque, eos, esse (broken e, not misprints); Variorum notae at page foot (Mali sunt ...) not set, for later pass; heading VARIORUM NOT[AE] runs across the page, not set
PL 6:576
eos fit, quam ut occidantur, vel in servitutem abducantur. Hoc vero inenarrabile est, quod fit adversus eos qui malefacere nesciunt. Et nulli nocentiores habentur, quam qui sunt ex omnibus innocentes.
them is done than that they be killed, or led away into slavery. But this is beyond telling, which is done against those who do not know how to do harm. And none are held more guilty than those who are, of all men, innocent.
Audent igitur homines improbissimi justitiae facere mentionem, qui feras immanitate vincunt, qui placidissimum Dei gregem vastant,
The most wicked men, therefore, dare to make mention of justice, men who surpass wild beasts in savagery, who lay waste the most peaceful flock of God,
Lupi ceu Raptores atra in nebula, quos improba ventris Exegit caecos rabies.
like ravening wolves in a black mist, whom the shameless fury of the belly has driven forth blind.
Verum hos non ventris, sed cordis rabies efferavit; nec atra in nebula, sed aperta praedatione grassantur; nec eos unquam conscientia scelerum revocat, ne sanctum ac pium nomen justitiae ore illo violent, quod cruore innocentium, tanquam rictus bestiarum madet. Hujus tanti et tam pertinacis odii quam potissimum causam esse dicamus? Utrumne
But it is not the fury of the belly but of the heart that has made these men savage; nor do they prowl in a black mist, but by open plunder; nor does the consciousness of their crimes ever hold them back from profaning the holy and pious name of justice with that mouth which drips with the blood of the innocent, like the gaping jaws of beasts. What are we to say is above all the cause of so great and so persistent a hatred? Is it that
Veritas odium parit,
Truth begets hatred,
ut ait poeta, quasi divino spiritu instinctus? An erubescunt coram justis et bonis esse nequam? an potius utrumque? Nam et veritas ideo semper invisa est, quod is, qui peccat, vult habere liberum peccandi locum; nec aliter se putat malefactorum voluptate securius perfrui posse, quam si nemo sit, cui delicta non placeant. Ergo tanquam scelerum et malitiae suae testes extirpare funditus nituntur, et tollere, gravesque sibi putant, tanquam vita eorum coarguatur. Cur enim sint aliqui intempestive boni, qui, corruptis moribus publicis, convicium bene vivendo faciant? Cur non omnes sint aeque mali, rapaces, impudici, adulteri, perjuri, cupidi, fraudulenti? quin potius auferantur, quibus coram male vivere pudet; qui peccantium frontem, etsi non verbis, quia tacent, tamen ipso vitae genere dissimili feriunt et verberant? Castigare enim videtur quicumque dissentit.
as the poet says, as though moved by a divine spirit? Or are they ashamed to be wicked in the presence of the just and good? Or rather both? For truth too is always hated for this reason, that he who sins wants to have free room for sinning; and he does not think he can enjoy the pleasure of his misdeeds more securely in any other way than if there be no one whom his offences displease. Therefore they strive to root out utterly and to remove these men as witnesses of their crimes and wickedness, and they think them burdensome to themselves, as though their own life were being convicted. For why should there be some who are unseasonably good, who, when public morals are corrupt, cast reproach on them by living well? Why should not all be equally wicked, rapacious, unchaste, adulterous, perjured, covetous, fraudulent? Why not rather let those be removed in whose presence men are ashamed to live wickedly, who strike and lash the brow of sinners, if not with words, since they are silent, yet by the very unlikeness of their manner of life? For whoever differs seems to rebuke.
Editors' notes and page, col. 576

Page

  • running head: [LAC]TANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. (cut off at left edge), column number 576
  • marginal letters: A ‹eos fit, quam ut occidantur›; B ‹Hujus tanti et tam pertinacis›; C ‹non omnes sint aeque mali›; D ‹Et in altero cap. aliquot exemplis› (in the page-foot notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with "eos fit"; the Virgil verse quotation (Lupi ceu ... rabies.) is printed on three short lines and set here as one paragraph; full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" at the page foot, cut off at left, not set; page-foot Variorum notes (Inter arma, Lupi, Dicamus?, Veritas, etc.) left for the later pass; no editors' matter in the text block
PL 6:577
Nec est magnopere mirandum, si adversus homines ista fiunt, cum adversus ipsum Deum, propter eamdem causam, insurrexerit etiam populus in spe constitutus, nec Dei nescius; sequiturque justos eadem necessitas, quae ipsum justitiae violavit auctorem. Vexant ergo, et exquisitis poenarum generibus excruciant; parumque habent interficere quos oderunt, nisi etiam crudelitas corporibus illudat. Si qui autem doloris vel mortis metu, vel sua perfidia coeleste sacramentum deseruerint, et ad funesta sacrificia consenserint, eos laudant, et honoribus mactant, ut eorum exemplo caeteros illiciant. Qui autem magni aestimaverint fidem, cultoresque se Dei non abnegaverint, in eos vero totis carnificinae suae viribus, veluti sanguinem sitiant, incumbunt; et desperatos vocant, quia corpori suo minime parcunt: quasi quidquam desperatius esse possit, quam torquere ac dilaniare eum, quem scias esse innocentem. Adeo nec pudor ullus apud eos superest, a quibus abest omnis
Nor is it greatly to be wondered at if these things are done against men, since against God Himself, for the same cause, even a people established in hope, and not ignorant of God, rose up; and the same necessity pursues the just which did violence to the very Author of justice. They harass them, therefore, and torment them with exquisite kinds of punishments; and they count it too little to kill those whom they hate, unless cruelty also makes sport of their bodies. But if any, from fear of pain or of death, or by their own faithlessness, have deserted the heavenly sacrament and consented to the deadly sacrifices, these they praise and load with honours, so that by their example they may entice the rest. But those who have esteemed faith highly and have not denied that they are worshippers of God, upon them they fall with all the strength of their butchery, as though they thirsted for blood; and they call them desperate, because they do not spare their own body at all: as if anything could be more desperate than to torture and tear to pieces one whom you know to be innocent. So completely does no shame at all remain among those from whom there is absent all
Editors' notes and page, col. 577

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). In "Exponant" the Greek title of Longus is set as seen in the scan (ποιμενία; the work is the Ποιμενικά). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Quibus coram male vivere pudet› · col 577

mss. et plerique editi. Et recte, per anastrophen; hoc est, coram quibus christianis pudet ethnicos male vivere. At mss. Oxon. et 11 vulgati, ediderunt quos coram male vivere pudet: quasi pronomen quos cum pudet jungi poscat. — Non infrequens nostro anastrophe. lib. VI, cap. 5: Queis in versamur. Ibid. cap. 17: Quos contra disputant. Sensus est, pudet ethnicos coram Christianis male vivere: sensu eodem dixit supra: Erubescant coram justis et bonis esse nequam. Bun.

(continued) the manuscripts and most editions. And rightly, by anastrophe; that is, the Christians before whom the heathen are ashamed to live badly. But the Oxford manuscripts and eleven common editions printed "quos coram," as if the pronoun required to be joined with "pudet" in the accusative. — Anastrophe is not infrequent in our author: book VI, chapter 5: "which we are engaged in"; ibid. chapter 17: "whom they argue against." The sense is: the heathen are ashamed to live badly in the presence of Christians; in the same sense he said above: "Are they ashamed to be wicked before the just and good?" Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ipsum Deum› · col 577

Ipsum Deum. Christum scilicet.

"God Himself." Christ, that is.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Populus in spe constitutus› · col 577

Populus in spe constitutus. Judaicus scilicet, de quo Actor. c. XXVI, v. 6: In spe quae ad patres nostros repromissionis facta est a Deo.

"A people established in hope." The Jewish people, that is, of whom Acts 26:6: "For the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Justos› · col 577

Justos. Id est, Christianos.

"The just." That is, the Christians.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sua perfidia› · col 577

Sua perfidia. Mss. 1 Regio-Put. et 8 rec. cum editis, suapte; Brun. suadente. Caeteri scripti, inter quos 1 Bonon. et 1 Reg. antiquissimi, ut in textu, coeleste sacramentum deseruerint; id est, Christi religionem.

"By their own faithlessness." One Regius-Puteanus and eight recent manuscripts, with the editions, have "suapte"; the Brunswick, "at the urging (of faithlessness)." The other manuscripts, among them one Bologna and one Regius, both very ancient, have as in the text "they abandoned the heavenly sacrament"; that is, the religion of Christ.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et honoribus mactant› · col 577

Et honoribus mactant. Id est, augent, cumulant, apud Plautum et Ciceronem. 1 Colb. et Brun., magnificant. Francius forte lactant. At mactant, genuina Lactantii lectio. Sic infra, cap. 10, infortunio mactant.

"And they load them with honours." That is, they increase, heap up, as in Plautus and Cicero. One Colbertine and the Brunswick have "magnify." Francius suggests perhaps "lactant" (they entice). But "mactant" is Lactantius's genuine reading. So below, chapter 10, "they load with misfortune."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Desperatos vocant› · col 577

Desperatos vocant, etc. Desperatus est παράβολος: ita vocati qui aliter confectores dicebantur, qui ad bestias pugnabant, et illis conficiendis operam suam locabant, quos inde παραβόλους desperatos vocabant. Et ita olim Christiani indigitati, quod sibi non parcerent, atque animam libenter pro Deo suo ponerent. Salmasius. — Mallentque lacerari, quam fidem Christo datam violare.

"They call them desperate," etc. "Desperate" is παράβολος: so were called those otherwise named "finishers," who fought with the beasts and hired out their services for dispatching them, whom they therefore called παραβόλους, desperate men. And so the Christians were once named, because they did not spare themselves and gladly laid down their lives for their God. Salmasius. — And they would rather be torn apart than break the faith pledged to Christ.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Impios enim vocant› · col 577

Impios enim vocant. Christiani vulgari convicio ab ethnicis impii, infausti, athei, irreligiosi, profani et sacrilegi nuncupati, quia diis nil omnino tribuebant, nec pro imperatoribus sacrificabant, Tertull.: Deos, inquitis, non colitis, et pro imperatoribus sacrificia non impenditis, etc. itaque sacrilegii et majestatis rei convenimur. Arnob. lib. IV: Quoniam nos impios, irreligiosos vocatis.

"For they call them impious." Christians were called by the heathen, in common abuse, impious, ill-omened, atheists, irreligious, profane and sacrilegious, because they gave nothing whatever to the gods and did not sacrifice for the emperors. Tertullian: "You do not worship the gods, you say, and you do not offer sacrifices for the emperors," etc.; "therefore we are arraigned as guilty of sacrilege and treason." Arnobius, book IV: "Since you call us impious, irreligious."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Adeo nec pudor ullus› · col 577

Adeo nec pudor ullus. Mss. 3 rec. et 6 vet. editi, Adeo vero nec pudor ullus.

"So far is there no shame at all." Three recent manuscripts and six old editions have "So far indeed is there no shame at all."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Retorquent› · col 577

Retorquent. Ms. Jun. et 5 excusi, detorquent; 2 Colb. et 1 Clarom. torquent.

"They turn back." The Junius manuscript and five printed editions have "detorquent" (twist aside); two Colbertine and one Clermont, "torquent" (twist).

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ipsi scilicet pii, et ab humano sanguine abhorrentes› · col 577

Ipsi scilicet pii, et ab humano sanguine abhorrentes. Haec per ironiam dicta. Mss. 14 et edit. Rom. 1470, ipsi scilicet impii, male; non enim cohaeret cum et ab humano sanguine abhorrentes.

"They, of course, being pious and shrinking from human blood." This is said in irony. Fourteen manuscripts and the Rome edition of 1470 have "they, of course, being impious," wrongly; for it does not fit with "and shrinking from human blood."

(lemma) ‹anchor: De nostro, sed ex illorum numero› · col 577

De nostro, sed ex illorum numero. Ita plurimi mss. inter quos sunt antiqui. In 12 rec. bis legitur de; bis ex in Brun.

"Not from our number, but from theirs." So very many manuscripts, among them ancient ones. In twelve recent manuscripts "de" is read twice; "ex" twice in the Brunswick.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Si nimium pii fuerint› · col 578

Si nimium pii fuerint. Goth.: Si minus pii fuerint. At volebant magis pii videri, qui exponebant pueros, quam qui strangulabant. Alias facile erat corrigere, si nimirum pii fuerint. Variare enim has voces in mss. ostendi ad lib. I, cap. 10. Bun.

"If they are too pious." The Gotha: "If they are less pious." But those who exposed their children wished to seem more pious than those who strangled them. Otherwise it would be easy to correct to "if, forsooth, they are pious." For I have shown on book I, chapter 10, that these words vary in the manuscripts. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Exponant› · col 578

Exponant. Sic Tertull. Apol., capite 9: Imprimis filios exponitis, suscipiendos ab aliqua matre extranea. Arist. lib. VII, Politic., cap. 17. Secundum legem Atheniensibus libitum fuit interficere, vel exponere, quidquid natum nollent: quae crudelitas etiam apud populum sapientissimum! Thebani contrarium lege caverant, ut si quis infantem exposuisset, morte plecteretur. Aelianus Variar. hist. lib. II, cap. 7. Exponebantur vero saepe infantes cum monumentis, quae generali nomine Graecis γνωρίσματα, Latinis crepundia dicuntur. Terent. Eunuch. Act. IV, Sc. 6: Ubi tu cistellam? adfer cum monumentis. Addebantur haec crepundia, tanquam fortunae viatica, ut, qui infantes inveniret, haberet unde aleret. Variae hujusmodi monumentorum species recensentur apud Longum, lib. I ποιμενία. Ibi de fasciis, ensiculo, mitra, crepidis aliisque id genus, loquitur. Betul.

"That they expose them." So Tertullian, Apology chapter 9: "First of all you expose your sons, to be taken up by some stranger-mother." Aristotle, Politics book VII, chapter 17. By law the Athenians were free to kill or expose whatever was born that they did not want: such cruelty even among the wisest people! The Thebans had provided the contrary by law, that if anyone exposed an infant he should be punished with death. Aelian, Varia historia book II, chapter 7. Infants were often exposed with tokens, which by a general name are called γνωρίσματα by the Greeks and "crepundia" by the Latins. Terence, Eunuch Act IV, scene 6: "Where is the casket? Bring it with the tokens." These trinkets were added as provision for fortune's road, so that whoever found the infants might have the means to rear them. Various kinds of such tokens are listed in Longus, book I of the Pastorals. There he speaks of swaddling bands, a little sword, a headband, sandals and other things of the kind. Betuleius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sacerdote› · col 578

Sacerdote. Pro Vestali virgine, sic Aeneid. I, 277, Regina Sacerdos, pro Vestali.

"A priestess." For a Vestal virgin; so Aeneid I, 277, "the royal priestess," for a Vestal.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nec culleum› · col 578

Nec culleum. Ita scribo cum antiquis, et cum mss. 1 Regio-Put., 4 al. Reg., 2 Colb., 1 Sorbon., Nav., Vict.. Gat., Marm., 1 Clarom. edit., 2 vet. Rom., et Fasit. 1543. At 1 Colbert. et Brun. nec ullum; 1 Reg. rec., 4 Colbert., 1 Clarom. et 6 excusi, nec culeum; 1 Reg. antiq. 2 Colbert. a secunda manu, Jun., nec eculeum. De hoc supplicii genere dixi ad c. 14, l. III.

"Nor the sack." So I write with the ancients and with the manuscripts: one Regius-Puteanus, four other Regii, two Colbertine, one Sorbonne, the Navarre, the Victorine, the Gatianus, the Marmoutier, one Clermont edition, the two old Rome editions and Fasitelius 1543. But one Colbertine and the Brunswick have "nec ullum" (nor any); one recent Regius, four Colbertine, one Clermont and six printed editions, "nec culeum"; one ancient Regius, two Colbertine in a second hand, and the Junius, "nec eculeum" (nor the rack). On this kind of punishment I spoke on chapter 14, book III.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Atque illis usitata› · col 578

Atque illis usitata. Sic ferunt quamplurimi mss., inter quos duo sunt Regii antiquissimi, 1 Bonon. quoque qui addit illis. Sed Cauc., Lips., Pal., Ultr., legunt neque usitata; alii rec. et totidem editi, atque inusitata. Secuti sumus lectionem a Thomasio allatam ex veteri codice Bononiensi desumptam; quam doctissimus editor hoc confirmat exemplo. Haec, inquit, testamentorum suppositio ad haereditates invadendas, apud Gentiles valde erat usitata: quo nomine M. Crassus, qui unus erat ex principibus Rom. Reipub. male audivit. Quod cum in principe accideret, quid de aliis credendum est?

"And customary among them." So very many manuscripts, among which are two very ancient Regii, and one Bologna also, which adds "among them." But the Cauci, Leipzig, Palatine and Utrecht read "nor customary"; other recent manuscripts and as many editions, "and uncustomary." We have followed the reading brought forward by Thomasius, taken from the old Bologna codex, which that most learned editor confirms by this example: "This forging of wills to seize inheritances," he says, "was very customary among the Gentiles; on which account Marcus Crassus, who was one of the leading men of the Roman commonwealth, had a bad name. Since this happened in a leading man, what are we to believe of others?"

(printed under page 302)

Page

  • running head: 577 LIBER V. DE JUSTITI[A] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹Nec est magnopere mirandum›; B ‹quidquam desperatius esse possit›; C ‹Populus in spe constitutus› (in the Variorum notae); D ‹Impios enim vocant› (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-sentence at "omnis" (continues in the next column, presumably "humanitas"); the full-width heading VARIORUM NOTAE stands below the text block across both columns, cut off at the right edge, not set; the Variorum notae below it (from "mss. et plerique editi" to "bis ex in Brun.") are page-foot commentary for the later pass, not set
PL 6:578
humanitas! Et retorquent in homines justos convicia sibi congruentia.
humanity! And they turn back upon just men the reproaches that befit themselves.
Impios enim vocant, ipsi scilicet pii, et ab humano sanguine abhorrentes; cum si et actus suos considerent, et illorum quos tanquam impios damnant, jam intelligant, quam mendaces sint, et iis omnibus, quae adversus bonos aut dicunt, aut faciunt, digniores. Non enim de nostro, sed ex illorum numero semper existunt, qui vias obsideant armati, maria praedentur; vel si palam grassari non licuit, venena clam temperent; qui uxores necent, ut dotes earum lucrentur, aut maritos, ut adulteris nubant, qui natos ex se pueros aut strangulent, aut si nimium pii fuerint, exponant; qui libidines incestas, nec a filia, nec a sorore, nec a matre, nec a sacerdote contineant; qui adversus cives suos patriamque conjurent: qui nec culleum metuant; qui denique sacrilegia committant, et deorum, quos colunt, templa dispolient; et ut quae levia sunt atque illis usitata dicamus, qui haereditates
For they call [us] impious, they themselves, of course, being pious and shrinking from human blood; whereas, if they would consider both their own acts and those of the men whom they condemn as impious, they would at once understand how lying they are, and how much more deserving they are of all the things which they either say or do against the good. For not from our number, but from theirs, there always arise those who beset the roads under arms and plunder the seas; or, if it has not been possible to rob openly, secretly mix poisons; who kill their wives in order to profit by their dowries, or their husbands in order to marry adulterers; who either strangle the boys born of themselves or, if they are excessively pious, expose them; who restrain their incestuous lusts neither from a daughter, nor from a sister, nor from a mother, nor from a priestess; who conspire against their fellow citizens and their fatherland; who do not fear even the sack; who, finally, commit sacrileges and despoil the temples of the gods whom they worship; and, to mention things that are light and customary among them, who inheritances
Editors' notes and page, col. 578

Page

  • running head: V. DE JUSTITIA. 578 (left part of the running head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹humanitas! Et retorquent›; B ‹culleum metuant; qui denique›; C ‹populum sapientissimum› (in the notes); D ‹mss. 1 Regio-Put.› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: last word "haere-" is split at the column break and set whole at the end of this column as haereditates, with "inheritances" in the English (Q3a: earlier wording said "set with hyphen, English ends at who", stale after the join); the full-width heading "[V]ARIORUM NOTAE" across both columns is cut off at the left edge and not set; the Variorum Notae at the page foot (Si nimium pii fuerint; Exponant; Sacerdote; Nec culleum; Atque illis usitata) are left for the later pass; fragments of the neighbouring column 577 at the left edge are not set; Google/ABK-FR digitization stamp ignored
PL 6:579
captent, testamenta supponant, justos haeredes vel auferant, vel excludant; qui corpora sua libidinibus prostituant; qui denique immemores, quid nati sint, cum foeminis patientia certent; qui sanctissimam quoque corporis sui partem contra fas omne polluant et profanent; qui virilia sua ferro metant; et, quod est sceleratius, ut sint religionis antistites; qui ne vitae quidem suae parcant, sed extinguendas publice animas suas vendant; si judices sedeant, aut immeritos perdant mercede corrupti, aut noxios impune dimittant; qui coelum quoque ipsum veneficiis appetant, tanquam illorum malitiam terra non capiat. Haec, inquam, et his plura scelera utique ab iis fiunt, qui deos colunt.
hunt for, substitute wills, and either rob the lawful heirs or shut them out; who prostitute their bodies to lusts; who, in short, forgetful of what they were born, compete with women in submission; who pollute and profane even the most sacred part of their body against all right; who mow off their virile parts with a blade, and, what is more wicked, so that they may be priests of religion; who do not spare even their own life, but sell their lives to be extinguished in public; if they sit as judges, either destroy the undeserving, corrupted by a bribe, or let the guilty go unpunished; who assail even heaven itself with sorceries, as though the earth could not contain their malice. These, I say, and more crimes than these are certainly committed by those who worship the gods.
Quis inter haec tot ac tanta justitiae locus est? Et ego de multis collegi, non ut arguerem, sed ut ostenderem. Qui volent scire omnia, Senecae libros in manum sumant, qui morum vitiorumque publicorum et descriptor verissimus, et accusator acerrimus fuit. Sed et Lucilius tenebrosam istam vitam circumscripte breviterque depinxit his versibus:
What place is there for justice amid so many and such great evils? And I have gathered these from many, not in order to accuse, but in order to show. Those who wish to know all of them should take into their hands the books of Seneca, who was both the most truthful describer and the sharpest accuser of public morals and vices. But Lucilius too depicted that dark life concisely and briefly in these verses:
Nunc vero a mane ad noctem, festo atque profesto / Totus item pariterque die, populusque, patresque / Jactare induforo se omnes; decedere nusquam, / Uni se atque eidem studio omnes dedere et arti: / Verba dare ut caute possint, pugnare dolose, / Blanditia certare, bonum simulare virum se, / Insidias facere, ut si hostes sint omnibus omnes.
But now from morning to night, on holiday and working day alike, / the whole day likewise and equally, both people and senators, / all bustle about in the forum; never to depart anywhere, / all to give themselves to one and the same pursuit and art: / that they may deceive warily, fight craftily, / compete in flattery, pretend to be a good man, / lay ambushes, as if all were enemies to all.
Editors' notes and page, col. 579

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Cum foeminis patientia certent› · col 579

Cum foeminis patientia certent. Contra eos qui in viros libidine exardescunt.

"Vie with women in submissiveness." Against those who burn with lust for men.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Qui sanctissimam quoque corporis sui partem contra fas omne polluant› · col 579

Qui sanctissimam quoque corporis sui partem contra fas omne polluant. Dum videlicet execrabilem in se furorem admittunt: qui nec capiti quidem parcit, ut ait lib. VI, c. 23, ita Isaeus. Num de crimine intelligitur eum vir in seipso violat continentiam? — Sanctissimam... corporis... partem. Sc. caput. Vide Scriptores a me citatos ad l. VI, c. 23. Hic expressit Ciceronem post reditum, c. 5, Qui ne a sanctissima quidem parte corporis potuisset hominum impuram intemperantiam propulsare. Videsis Graevium h. l. p. 367. Bun.

"Who defile even the most sacred part of their body against all right." That is, when they admit an accursed frenzy upon themselves, "which does not spare even the head," as he says in book VI, chapter 23; so Isaeus. Is the crime meant by which a man violates continence in himself? — "The most sacred … part … of the body." Namely the head. See the writers I cited on book VI, chapter 23. Here he reproduced Cicero, After his Return, chapter 5: "Who could not drive off men's foul intemperance even from the most sacred part of his body." See Graevius on this place, page 367. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Qui virilia sua ferro metant› · col 579

Qui virilia sua ferro metant. Arnob. lib. V: Et non quotidie videamus eos, qui sibi demessuerint has partes.

"Who reap their members with the knife." Arnobius, book V: "And do we not see daily those who have cut off these parts from themselves?"

(lemma) ‹anchor: Senecae libros› · col 579

Senecae libros. Inter ea quae ejus extant, lege alteram epistolam libri decimi sexti, ubi cum in alia scelera, tum vero maxime in judices corruptos invehitur. Eadem videas in Tertulliani Apologetico, cap. 12.

"The books of Seneca." Among those of his that survive, read the second letter of the sixteenth book, where he inveighs against other crimes but above all against corrupt judges. You may see the same in Tertullian's Apology, chapter 12.

(lemma) ‹anchor: In manum sumant› · col 579

In manum sumant. Cicero lib. III, de Orat. cap. 4: Qui haec in manus sument. Lib. II, Tuscul. cap. 3: Epicurum... in manus sumit. Plinius lib. I. epist. 16: Quum ejus orationes in manus sumpseris. Quintil. lib. X Inst. cap. 1, pag. 882: Quarum orationes in manus sumpserimus. Bun.

"Let them take into hand." Cicero, On the Orator book III, chapter 4: "Who will take these things into their hands." Tusculans book II, chapter 3: "He takes Epicurus … into his hands." Pliny, Letters book I, letter 16: "When you have taken his speeches into your hands." Quintilian, Institutes book X, chapter 1, page 882: "Whose speeches we have taken into our hands." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Pariterque die› · col 579

Pariterque die. Ita Regio-Put. aliique. In 17 rec. et editis 5 est dies. 1 Reg. antiq. pariter quidem.

"And by day alike." So the Regius-Puteanus and others. In seventeen recent manuscripts and five editions it is "dies"; the ancient Regius 1 has "alike indeed."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Induforo› · col 579, runs into col 580

Induforo. Mirum quam hic varient manuscripti. Lego Induforo ex 1 Reg. antiquissimo, Pal. et Pen. et ipso Lucilio, edito a Francisco Dousa, accedentibus mss. Cauc., 4 Reg., 5 Oxon., 3 Colbert., Jun., Ultr., Nav., Gat., Marm., Em., 2 Clarom., Brun., et 6 edit. quibus est indeforo, pro induforo, per archaismum, ut legitur apud Lucretium, lib. IV. vers. 318; edit. Lambin. Indugredi, vel endogredi pro ingredi. Dixerunt enim Antiqui indu et endo, pro in, ut observat Lambinus ibidem, pag. 456 et 277. Apud eumdem Lucretium indu manu, indu statu, pro in manu, in statu; lib. V, indu manus, pro in manus; et lib. VI, indu mari, pro in mari. 1 Bonon. antiq. et 4 alii rec. habent induforum; 2 Reg. induforus; 1 Reg. et 5 vulgati indufori; 1 Colbert. et Vict. videre foro, corrupte. Legitur etiam induforo apud Ennium libro VII. Induforos eos existimat Betuleius, qui otia sua in foro terunt; sicut inforare apud Plautum idem est, ac aliquid in foro vulgare. Fere similia in Virgilio induperator, pro imperator; et indugredi ac indupeditus apud Lucretium, pro ingredi et impeditus. Existimat tamen Thom. Spark. legendum esse endo forum, quia sic Lucret. lib. II, habet: Si fas endo plagas coelestes scandere cuiquam; atque endogredi apud eumdem Lucretium, pro ingredi.

"In the forum" (archaic "induforo"). It is remarkable how the manuscripts vary here. I read "Induforo" from the very ancient Regius 1, the Palatine, the Pen., and Lucilius himself as edited by Franciscus Dousa, with the support of the Cauci, Regius 4, Oxford 5, Colbert 3, the Junius, the Utrecht, the Navarre, the Gatianus, the Marmoutier, the Emmanuel, Clermont 2, the Brunswick and six editions, which have "indeforo" for "induforo," by archaism, as one reads in Lucretius, book IV, line 318, Lambin's edition, "indugredi" or "endogredi" for "ingredi." For the ancients said "indu" and "endo" for "in," as Lambin observes in the same place, pages 456 and 277. In the same Lucretius, "indu manu," "indu statu," for "in manu," "in statu"; book V, "indu manus" for "in manus"; and book VI, "indu mari" for "in mari." The ancient Bologna 1 and four other recent manuscripts have "induforum"; Regius 2, "induforus"; Regius 1 and five common editions, "indufori"; Colbert 1 and the Victorine, "videre foro," corruptly. "Induforo" is also read in Ennius, book VII. Betuleius thinks "induforos" are those who wear away their leisure in the forum; just as "inforare" in Plautus means to publish something in the forum. Much the same are, in Virgil, "induperator" for "imperator," and in Lucretius "indugredi" and "indupeditus" for "ingredi" and "impeditus." Thomas Sparke, however, thinks "endo forum" should be read, because Lucretius has thus in book II: "If it be lawful for anyone to climb into the heavenly regions"; and "endogredi" in the same Lucretius for "ingredi."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Blanditia certare› · col 580

Blanditia certare. Ita cuncti fere mss. et edd. nec aliter legitur apud Lucilium. mss. rec. 1 Reg., Balliol. et vulgati sex, blandiri, certare.

"To vie in flattery." So almost all the manuscripts and editions, nor is it read otherwise in Lucilius. The recent manuscripts Regius 1 and the Balliol, and six common editions, have "to flatter, to vie."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nostro› · col 580

Nostro. Ita etiam Tertullianus.

"Ours." So Tertullian too.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Universa sequeretur› · col 580

Universa sequeretur. Sic omnes prope mss. et impressi. Regio-Put. et excusi ferunt sequitur; 1 Bonon. antiq. quaereretur: 2 Reg. rec., 1 Colb., Cant. et 3 vet. edit. frequentatur. Nostra lectio multum arridebat Antonio Augustino, viro in litteris sagacissimo.

"All things would follow." So almost all the manuscripts and printed editions. The Regius-Puteanus and the printed editions have "follows"; the ancient Bologna 1, "would be sought"; the recent Regius 2, Colbert 1, the Cambridge and three old editions, "is frequented." Our reading much pleased Antonio Agustín, a man most shrewd in letters.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Eoque fieri› · col 580

Eoque fieri. Ita restitui ex multis editis, cunctisque mss. praeter 2 Reg. et 7 edit. qui habent aeque; edit. Thomas. Atque; 1 Bonon. antiq. Atquin. Haec emendatio est Antonii Augustini jamjam laudati, qui legebat, quod est summum, per caetera universa sequitur, eoque fieri non potest, etc. quae lectio multum Thomasio arridebat. At Buneman habet. Aeque fieri non potest, et in hanc vocem notam sequentem exhibet. — Frequenter ita Lactantius voce aeque utitur, quod hinc inde libri, substituto eoque, corruperunt. Sic l. III, c. 17: Sapientis est male facere... Aeque stulti est bene facere. Ibid., c. 27: Qui religionem non suscipiunt, terreni sunt, quia... est; et qui animam putant... interire, aeque in terram spectant, quia, etc. Bun.

"And for that reason to be done." So I have restored from many editions and all the manuscripts except Regius 2 and seven editions, which have "aeque" (equally); Thomasius's edition, "Atque"; the ancient Bologna 1, "Atquin." This emendation is that of Antonio Agustín, just praised, who read: "what is highest is followed through all the rest, and for that reason it cannot be," etc., a reading which much pleased Thomasius. But Bünemann has "It cannot equally be," and on this word gives the following note: — Lactantius often uses the word "aeque" thus, which the books here and there have corrupted by substituting "eoque." So book III, chapter 17: "It is the wise man's part to do ill … it is equally the fool's part to do good." Ibid., chapter 27: "Those who do not take up religion are earthly, because … ; and those who think the soul … perishes equally look to the earth, because," etc. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Non et in religione fallantur› · col 580

Non et in religione fallantur. Ex cunctis mss. et editis quamplurimis restitui particulam negantem, quae abest a nonnullis editis. In 6 excusis est, non etiam.

"Are not deceived in religion too." From all the manuscripts and very many editions I have restored the negative particle, which is absent from some editions. In six printed editions it is "not also."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Servaret in caeteris› · col 580

Servaret in caeteris. Haec lectio est quamplurimorum (continues)

"Would keep in the rest." This is the reading of very many (continues)

(printed under page 303)

Page

  • running head: 579 FIRM. LACTANTII I[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ditates captent, testamenta supponant; B tenderem. Qui volent scire omnia; C viros libidine exardescunt. / Qui sanctissimam (in the notes); D Quum ejus orationes in manus sumpseris (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-word with "ditates" (rest of "haereditates" from the column before); verse lines of Lucilius set as one paragraph, with " / " marking the printed line ends; "induforo" is printed thus, an archaism for "in foro"; the full-width line "VARIORUM [NOTAE]" below the verses is cut off at the edge and not set; the Variorum notes that follow ("Cum foeminis patientia certent..." to "...1 Reg. et 5") are the editors' commentary at the page foot and are left for the later pass
PL 6:580
Nostro autem populo quid horum potest objici, cujus omnis religio est, sine scelere ac sine macula vivere? Cum igitur videant, et se, ac suos ea quae diximus gerere, nostros autem nihil aliud operari, nisi aequum et bonum; poterant, si quid saperent, ex hoc intelligere, et illos qui bonum faciunt pios esse, et se impios, qui nefanda committunt: neque enim fieri potest, ut qui in omnibus vitae suae actibus non errant, in ipsa summa errent, hoc est in religione, quae rerum omnium caput est. Impietas enim suscepta in eo, quod est summum, per caetera universa sequeretur. Eoque fieri non potest, ut ipsi, qui errant in omni vita, non et in religione fallantur: quoniam pietas in summo regulam tenens, tenorem suum servaret in caeteris. Ita fit ut in utraque parte, de conditione rerum quae geruntur, qualis sit summa ipsa noscatur.
But which of these things can be laid against our people, whose whole religion is to live without crime and without stain? Since, therefore, they see that both they themselves and their own do the things we have described, while ours practise nothing other than what is fair and good, they could, if they had any sense, understand from this both that those who do good are pious and that they themselves, who commit unspeakable things, are impious: for it cannot be that those who do not err in any of the acts of their life should err in the chief matter itself, that is, in religion, which is the head of all things. For impiety, once taken up in that which is highest, would follow through all the rest. And so it cannot be that those who err in all their life are not deceived in religion also: since piety, holding its rule in the highest thing, would keep its course in the rest. Thus it comes about that on either side the character of the chief matter itself is known from the nature of the things that are done.
CAPUT X.
Chapter X.
De falsa pietate, et de falsa et vera religione.
Of false piety, and of false and true religion.
Operae pretium est cognoscere illornm pietatem, ut ex iis, quae clementer ac pie faciunt, possit intelligi qualia sint quae ab his contra jura pietatis geruntur. Ac ne quem videar inclementer incessere, aliquam mihi personam poeticam sumam, quae sit
It is worth while to learn their piety, so that from the things which they do mercifully and piously it may be understood of what kind are the things that are done by them against the laws of piety. And lest I seem to attack anyone unmercifully, I shall take up some poetic character, who may be
Editors' notes and page, col. 580

Page

  • running head: [cut off]I. LACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 580
  • marginal letters: A ‹Nostro autem populo quid horum›; B ‹summa ipsa noscatur.›; C ‹rupte. Legitur etiam induforo› (in Variorum Notae); D ‹Eoque fieri. Ita restitui› (in Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: UNSURE whether "illornm" is a turned letter or damaged type; the heading VARIORUM NOTAE runs across both columns and, with the notes below it, is left for the later pass; no word split at the column break
PL 6:581
vel maximum pietatis exemplum. Apud Maronem rex ille,
the very greatest example of piety. In Maro, that king,
Quo justior alter / Nec pietate fuit, nec bello major et armis,
than whom no other was more just, / Nor greater in piety, nor in war and arms,
quae nobis documenta justitiae protulit?
what proofs of justice did he offer us?
Vinxerat et post terga manus, quos mitteret umbris / Inferias, caeso sparsurus sanguine flammas.
He had bound behind their backs the hands of those whom he would send to the shades / As funeral offerings, meaning to sprinkle the flames with the blood of the slain.
Quid potest esse hac pietate clementius, quam mortuis humanas victimas immolare, et ignem cruore hominum tanquam oleo pascere? sed fortasse hoc non ipsius vitium fuerit, sed poetae, qui
What can be more merciful than this piety: to sacrifice human victims to the dead, and to feed fire with the gore of men as if with oil? But perhaps this was not his own fault, but the poet's, who
Insignem pietate virum
a man distinguished for piety
insigni scel⟨e⟩re foedaverit. Ubi est igitur, o poeta, pietas illa quam saepissime laudas? Ecce pius Aeneas
defiled with a distinguished crime. Where then, O poet, is that piety which you so very often praise? Behold, pious Aeneas
Sulmone creatos / Quattuor hic juvenes, totidem quos educat Ufens, / Viventes rapit, inferias quos immolet umbris, / Captivoque rogi perfundat sanguine flammas.
Four youths born of Sulmo / Here, and as many whom Ufens rears, / He seizes alive, to sacrifice them as funeral offerings to the shades, / And to drench the flames of the pyre with captive blood.
Cur ergo dicebat eodem ipso tempore quo vinctos homines ad immolationem mittebat,
Why then did he say, at the very same time as he was sending bound men to be sacrificed,
Equidem et vivis concedere vellem;
Indeed, I would wish to grant it to the living too;
cum quos vivos habebat in potestate, vice pecudum juberet occidi? Sed haec, ut dixi, culpa non illius fuit, qui litteras fortasse non didicerat, sed tua, qui cum esses eruditus, ignorasti tamen quid esset pietas, et illud ipsum, quod nefarie, quod detestabiliter fecit, pietatis esse officium credidisti. Videlicet ob hoc unum pius vocatur, quia patrem dilexit. Quid quod:
when he ordered those whom he had alive in his power to be slaughtered like cattle? But this, as I said, was the fault not of him, who perhaps had not learned letters, but yours, who, though you were learned, were nevertheless ignorant of what piety was, and believed that very thing which he did wickedly, which he did detestably, to be a duty of piety. Evidently he is called pious for this one reason, that he loved his father. What of the fact that:
Editors' notes and page, col. 581

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). -->

(continued) ‹anchor: Servaret in caeteris› · col 581

mss. et 7 editorum. Regio-Put. et 7 alii rec. et 5 edit. servat et; ms. Jun. servant.

(continued) manuscripts and of seven editions. The Regius-Puteanus, seven other recent manuscripts and five editions have "servat et"; the Junius manuscript, "servant."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Rex ille› · col 581

Rex ille. Aeneas scilicet, Virgil. I Aeneid. 544.

"That king." Aeneas, that is: Virgil, Aeneid I, 544.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Vinxerat› · col 581

Vinxerat. Virgil. XI, v. 81.

"He had bound." Virgil, Aeneid XI, line 81.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Umbris› · col 581

Umbris. Umbrae sunt animae defunctorum.

"To the shades." The shades are the souls of the dead.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Inferias› · col 581

Inferias. Inferiae sunt sacra mortuorum XXX et XL. et anniversario die, cum aspersione super tumulum. Vid. Virg. lib. V.

"Offerings to the dead." "Inferiae" are the rites for the dead on the thirtieth and fortieth day and on the anniversary, with a sprinkling over the tomb. See Virgil, book V.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Caeso sanguine› · col 581

Caeso sanguine. Pro caesorum sanguine; ut idem Aeneid. lib. X, v. 520, Captivo sanguine, pro sanguine captivorum.

"With slain blood." For "with the blood of the slain"; as the same poet, Aeneid book X, line 520, "with captive blood," for "with the blood of captives."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sparsurus› · col 581

Sparsurus. Ex omnibus ferme mss. et 15 excusis; melius quam sparsuros, ut est in 1 rec. Reg., Jun., 1 Colbert. et 6 vet. edit. In 3 scriptis rec. sparsuras, mendose.

"About to sprinkle." From almost all the manuscripts and fifteen printed editions; better than "sparsuros," as in the recent Regius 1, the Junius, Colbert 1 and six old editions. In three recent manuscripts, "sparsuras," faultily.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Clementius› · col 581

Clementius. Ironice. Ita mss. 1 Reg. antiquissimus, 2 Bonon., 4 al. Reg., 4 Colbert., 3 Lips., Bold. Cotton. Marm., 1 Clarom. edit. vet. Rom. 1474, et al. 7. Et recte. Vide supra clementer, et inclementer, et infra quae sequuntur. Ms. Jun. cum Francio inclementius; Regio-Put. et 13 rec. scripti ac 10 edit. dementius. Hanc lectionem ultimam minus apte defendit Gallaeus; nec enim advertebat hic esse ironiam Lactantii in Gentiles. Vide not. ad c. 36, de Mortibus Persecutorum. Quid potest esse hac pietate clementius. — Mss. Jun. inclementius, unde 10; Columbus ad c. 31, libri de Mort. Pers. veram lectionem esse colligit: Quid esse potest hac pietate inclementius? Quid dementius, quam mortis.., pascere, ut hoc velit: Nihil inclementius, adeoque nihil Aenea, qui pium se jactavit, indignius (nam et clementia pietas dicta, ut prius est ostensum) quam caedere et exurere crudeliter innoxios homines; nihil inconvenientius duci perito et prudenti, quam credere mortuos pasci cruore humano. Heumannus in addendis credit, Columbum ingeniose ac feliciter ita emendasse. Bun.

"More mercifully." Ironically. So the very ancient Regius 1, Bologna 2, another Regius 4, Colbert 4, Leipzig 3, the Bodleian, the Cotton, the Marmoutier, the Clermont 1, the old Rome edition of 1474, and seven others. And rightly. See above "mercifully" and "unmercifully," and what follows below. The Junius manuscript, with Francius, has "more unmercifully"; the Regius-Puteanus, thirteen recent manuscripts and ten editions, "more madly." Gallaeus defends this last reading less aptly; for he did not notice that here there is irony by Lactantius against the Gentiles. See the note on chapter 36 of On the Deaths of the Persecutors. "What can be more merciful than this piety." — The Junius manuscript has "more unmercifully," whence ten; Colomiès, on chapter 31 of the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors, concludes that the true reading is: "What can be more unmerciful than this piety? What more mad than to feed … of death," so that he means this: "Nothing more unmerciful, and so nothing more unworthy of Aeneas, who boasted himself pious (for mercy too is called piety, as was shown before), than cruelly to slaughter and burn innocent men; nothing more unfitting for a skilled and prudent leader than to believe that the dead are fed on human blood." Heumann, in his addenda, believes Colomiès emended it so ingeniously and happily. Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Qui insignem pietate virum insigne scelere foedaverit› · col 582

Qui insignem pietate virum insigne scelare foedaverit. Virgil. I Aeneid. Haec lectio est ex mss. Regio-Put., 5 al. Reg., 6 Colb. Cant., 2. Clarom. et 6 edit. nisi quod 4 scripti totidemque impressi legunt foedavit; caeteri foedaverit; 2 Reg. et 7 vulgati, qui illum insignem.

"Who has defiled a man outstanding in piety with an outstanding crime." Virgil, Aeneid I. This reading is from the Regius-Puteanus, another Regius 5, Colbert 6, the Cambridge, Clermont 2 and six editions, except that four manuscripts and as many printed editions read "foedavit"; the rest, "foedaverit"; Regius 2 and seven common editions, "who that outstanding man."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Ecce pius Aeneas› · col 582

Ecce pius Aeneas. Sic restitui ex mss. et excusis, praeter 1 Bonon. antiq. et 3 edit., in quibus est, Tum pius Aeneas; minus apte ad Lactantii mentem.

"Behold pious Aeneas." So I have restored from the manuscripts and printed editions, except the ancient Bologna 1 and three editions, in which it is "Then pious Aeneas"; less fitting to Lactantius's meaning.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Sulmone› · col 582

Sulmone. Haec ex Aeneid. lib. X, v. 517. Sulmone, quod in antiquo Latio oppidum fuit, ait Plinius.

"Of Sulmo." This is from Aeneid book X, line 517. Sulmo, Pliny says, was a town in ancient Latium.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quattuor hic juvenes… quos immolet umbris› · col 582

Quattuor hic juvenes... quos immolet umbris. Tertullianus: Olim, quoniam animas defunctorum humano sanguine propitiari creditum erat, captivos vel servos in exequiis immolabant.

"Here four youths … to sacrifice to the shades." Tertullian: "Formerly, since it was believed that the souls of the dead were propitiated by human blood, they sacrificed captives or slaves at funerals."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Eodem ipso tempore› · col 582

Eodem ipso tempore. Idem ipse, passim apud Lactantium.

"At that very same time." "Idem ipse" occurs throughout Lactantius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Equidem› · col 582

Equidem. Virgil. Aeneid. lib. XI, vers. 111.

"Indeed." Virgil, Aeneid book XI, line 111.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Bonus› · col 582

Bonus. Per ironiam, ex Virg., l. II.

"Good." In irony, from Virgil, book II.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Adjuratus enim per eumdem patrem› · col 582

Adjuratus enim per eumdem patrem. Aeneidos, lib. X, v. 524: Per patrios manes et spes surgentis Iuli Te precor hanc animam serves. Cell.

"For adjured by that same father." Aeneid book X, line 524: "By your father's shade and the hopes of rising Iulus, I pray you, spare this life." Cellarius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et per spes surgentis Iuli› · col 582

Et per spes surgentis Iuli. Ex Virgil. Aeneid., X, v. 524. Vocem per restitui ex 3 mss. Reg. quorum duo sunt antiquissimi. In 10 rec. et 6 impressis est, et spem.

"And by the hopes of rising Iulus." From Virgil, Aeneid X, line 524. I have restored the word "by" from Regius 3, two of which are very ancient. In ten recent manuscripts and six printed editions it is "and the hope."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Furiis› · col 582

Furiis. Virg., Aeneid., l. XII, v. 946.

"With fury." Virgil, Aeneid book XII, line 946.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Et manium patris› · col 582

Et manium patris. Mss. 3 Colb. et 1 Clarom. manum; Em. inanimis.

"And of his father's shade." Colbert 3 and Clermont 1 have "manum"; the Emmanuel, "inanimis."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Repugnantes› · col 582

Repugnantes. 1 Bonon. antiq. pugnantes; Jun. deprecantes.

"Resisting." The ancient Bologna 1 has "fighting"; the Junius, "pleading."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Dicet› · col 582

Dicet, etc. Eximia descriptio, qua docetur qui sint, vel esse debeant christiani.

"Someone will say," etc. An excellent description, teaching who Christians are, or ought to be.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Fiunt› · col 582

Fiunt. Heum. legit. sunt; recte.

"They become." Heumann reads "they are"; rightly.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Nihil ad deos› · col 582

Nihil ad deos. De hoc in libro de Ira Dei, c. 4, et supra, l. III, c. 17.

"Nothing to the gods." On this, in the book On the Anger of God, chapter 4, and above, book III, chapter 17.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Censentis› · col 582

Censentis. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. contestantis.

"Holding." The ancient Bologna manuscript 1 has "contestantis" (protesting).

(printed under page 304)

Page

  • running head: 581 LIBER V. DE JUSTITIA (cut off at the image edge after JUSTITI)
  • marginal letters: A ‹vel maximum pietatis exemplum. Apud Maronem›; B ‹Sulmone creatos›; C ‹quod :›; D ‹ton. Marm., 1 Clarom. edit.› (in the Variorum notae at the page foot)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "scel⟨e⟩re" printed with a damaged e that looks like c; "Viventes" and "homines" also show slightly damaged n, set as intended; verse quotations set as one paragraph each with " / " between printed lines; the heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" runs above the notes and is cut off at the right edge, not set; Variorum notae at the page foot not set (later pass); no editors' matter in the text block; in the foot note "Qui insignem … foedaverit" (col. 582) the lemma prints "scelare", set as printed, a misprint for scelere
PL 6:582
Bonus Aeneas haud aspernanda precantes trucidavit; adjuratus enim per eumdem patrem, et per Spes surgentis Iuli, nequaquam pepercit, Furiis accensus et ira. Quisquamne igitur hunc putet aliquid in se virtutis habuisse, qui et furore tamquam stipulo exarserit, et manium patris, per quem rogabatur, oblitus, iram fraenare nequiverit? Nullo igitur modo pius, qui non tantum non repugnantes, sed etiam precantes interemit.
The good Aeneas slaughtered men begging for things not to be scorned; for though adjured by that same father, and by the hopes of rising Iulus, he by no means spared them, kindled with frenzies and with wrath. Would anyone, then, think that this man had any virtue in him, who both blazed up with fury as if stubble, and, forgetful of the shade of his father, by whom he was being entreated, was unable to rein in his wrath? In no way, therefore, was he pious, who killed not only those who did not resist, but even those who entreated him.
Dicet hic aliquis: Quae ergo, aut ubi, aut qualis est pietas? Nimirum apud eos, qui bella nesciunt, qui concordiam cum omnibus servant, qui amici sunt etiam inimicis, qui omnes homines pro fratribus diligunt; qui cohibere iram sciunt, omnemque animi furorem tranquilla moderatione lenire. Quanta igitur caligo, quanta tenebrarum et errorum nubes hominum pectora obduxit; qui cum se maxime pios putant, tum maxime fiunt impii! Quanto enim religiosus terrenis istis simulacris inserviunt, tanto magis scelerati adversus nomen verae divinitatis existunt. Itaque pro merito impietatis suae gravioribus malis saepe vexantur, quorum causam quia nesciunt, fortunae culpa omnis adscribitur: et locum invenit Epicuri philosophia, nihil ad deos pertinere censentis; nec gratia eos tangi, nec ira moveri, quia et contemptores eorum saepe videant beatos, et cultores saepe miseros. Quod eo fit; quia cum religiosi videantur, et natura boni,
Someone will say here: What, then, or where, or of what kind is piety? Surely it is among those who know nothing of wars, who keep concord with all, who are friends even to their enemies, who love all men as brothers; who know how to restrain wrath, and to soothe every fury of the mind with calm moderation. How great a darkness, then, how great a cloud of shadows and errors has overspread the hearts of men, who, when they think themselves most pious, then become most impious! For the more religiously they serve these earthly images, the more wicked they show themselves against the name of the true divinity. And so, in just return for their impiety, they are often harassed by heavier evils, and because they do not know the cause of these, all the blame is ascribed to fortune: and the philosophy of Epicurus finds room, which holds that nothing concerns the gods; that they are neither touched by favour nor moved by wrath, since they often see those who despise them happy, and those who worship them often wretched. This comes about for this reason: that although they seem religious, and good by nature,
Editors' notes and page, col. 582

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left edge] V. DE JUSTITIA. 582
  • marginal letters: A Bonus Aeneas haud aspernanda; B inimicis, qui omnes homines; C eo fit; quia cum religiosi; D Equidem. Virgil. Aeneid. (in the Variorum notes block)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence and the verse phrases (Spes surgentis Iuli, Furiis accensus et ira) are printed on lines of their own; they are set within the one sentence. "Quisquamne" resumes flush left after the verse line, so it is not a new paragraph. The "stipulo" reading is UNSURE but appears to be what is printed. The text in the left-edge fragments belongs to col. 581 and is not set. A full-width heading "[VARIORUM] NOTAE" stands below the text block; it is cut off at the edge and not set. The Variorum notes at the page foot are left for the later pass.
PL 6:583
nihil tale creduntur mereri, quale saepe patiuntur. Consolantur se tamen accusatione fortunae; nec sentiunt quod si esset ulla, cultoribus suis nunquam noceret. Merito igitur hujusmodi pietatem poena consequitur, et offensa divinitas scelere hominum prave religiosorum gravi eos infortunio mactat; qui licet sanctis moribus vivant, in summa fide atque innocentia, tamen quia deos colunt, quorum ritus impios ac profanos Deus verus odio habet, a justitia, et a nomine verae pietatis alieni sunt.
they are believed to deserve nothing such as they often suffer. Yet they console themselves by accusing fortune; and they do not perceive that, if there were any [fortune], it would never harm its own worshippers. Deservedly, therefore, punishment follows piety of this kind, and the divinity, offended by the wickedness of perversely religious men, strikes them with grievous misfortune; for although they live with holy morals, in the highest good faith and innocence, yet because they worship gods whose impious and profane rites the true God holds in hatred, they are strangers to justice and to the name of true piety.
Nec est difficile docere, cur deorum cultores boni et justi esse non possint. Quomodo enim sanguine abstinebunt qui colunt cruentos deos, Martem atque Bellonam? quomodo aut parentibus parcent, qui expulsorem patris sui Jovem; aut natis ex se infantibus, qui Saturnum? quomodo pudicitiam tuebuntur, qui colunt deam nudam et adulteram, et quasi apud deos prostitutam? Quomodo se a rapinis et fraudibus abstinebunt, qui Mercurii furta noverunt, docentis non fraudis esse decipere, sed astutiae? quomodo libidines coercebunt, qui Jovem, Herculem, Liberum, Apollinem, caeterosque venerantur quorum adulteria, et stupra in mares et foeminas, non tantum doctis nota sunt, sed exprimuntur etiam in theatris, atque cantantur, ut sint omnibus notiora? Possuntne inter haec justi esse homines, qui, etiamsi natura sint boni, ab ipsis tamen diis erudiantur ad injustitiam? Ad placandum enim Deum quem colas, iis rebus opus est, quibus illum gaudere ac delectari scias. Sic fit ut vitam colentium Deus pro qualitate
Nor is it difficult to show why the worshippers of the gods cannot be good and just. For how will those abstain from blood who worship bloodthirsty gods, Mars and Bellona? how will they spare either their parents, who [worship] Jupiter, the expeller of his own father; or the infants born of themselves, who [worship] Saturn? how will they guard chastity, who worship a goddess naked and adulterous, and as it were prostituted among the gods? How will they keep themselves from robberies and frauds, who know the thefts of Mercury, who teaches that to deceive is a matter not of fraud but of cleverness? how will they restrain their lusts, who venerate Jupiter, Hercules, Liber, Apollo and the rest, whose adulteries and debaucheries with males and females are not only known to the learned, but are even acted out in the theatres, and sung, so that they may be the better known to all? Can men be just amid these things, who, even if they are good by nature, are nevertheless trained to injustice by the gods themselves? For to appease the god whom you worship, there is need of those things in which you know him to rejoice and take delight. Thus it comes about that the god shapes the life of his worshippers according to the quality
Editors' notes and page, col. 583

Footnotes

<!-- Series printed: VARIORUM NOTAE (lemma notes, no call letters; the lemma stands for the call). The first note is a new lemma; nothing runs over from p. 304. -->

(lemma) ‹anchor: Infortunio mactat› · col 583

Infortunio mactat. Ita et apud Plautum Amphytr., act. IV, scen. 2, et Curcul., act. IV, scen. 3; Terent. Phorm., V, 8, 39. Ita supra honore mactare, pro honore cumulare.

"Loads with misfortune." So too in Plautus, Amphitruo act IV, scene 2, and Curculio act IV, scene 3; Terence, Phormio V, 8, 39. So above, "to load with honour," for "to heap up with honour."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Summa fide› · col 583

Summa fide. Hic tantum agitur de fide civili quae, apud Ciceronem de Officiis, fundamentum est justitiae.

"With the highest good faith." Here only civil good faith is in question, which in Cicero's On Duties is the foundation of justice.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Martem› · col 583

Martem, etc. Contra vanitates istas satis dictum est libris I et II.

"Mars," etc. Enough has been said against these vanities in books I and II.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Saturnum› · col 583

Saturnum. Ed. Sublac. habet qui colunt Saturnum.

"Saturn." The Subiaco edition has "who worship Saturn."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Prostitutam› · col 583

Prostitutam. Lips. 2, 3, Reimm., destitutam. At plures mss. editi vero omnes, prostitutam. Ipse de eadem Venere, l. I, c. 17: Quid loquar obscoenitatem Veneris omnium libidinibus prostitutae? Conf., l. III, c. 22: Non adulterae... sed prostitutae. Bun.

"Prostituted." Leipzig 2 and 3 and the Reimmann have "destitutam" (abandoned). But more manuscripts and all the editions have "prostitutam." He himself, of the same Venus, book I, chapter 17: "Why should I speak of the obscenity of Venus, prostituted to the lusts of all?" Compare book III, chapter 22: "Not of an adulteress … but of a prostitute." Bünemann.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Exprimuntur› · col 583

Exprimuntur. Em. Exponuntur. — Exprimuntur. Ita, excepto Emman., omnes scripti et editi, et recte. Proprium in hac re verbum. Epit., c. 63: Histrionum etiam impudici gestus... libidines quas saltando exprimunt, docent. Non obscure exprimit Cyprianum, l. II, ep. 2, ed. Erasm. f. 33, exprimunt impudicam Venerem, adulterum Martem, etc.

"Are represented." The Emmanuel has "are exhibited." — "Are represented." So, except for the Emmanuel, all the manuscripts and editions, and rightly. It is the proper word in this matter. Epitome chapter 63: "The shameless gestures of the actors too … teach the lusts they represent by dancing." He plainly reproduces Cyprian, book II, letter 2, Erasmus's edition, folio 33: "They represent shameless Venus, adulterous Mars," etc.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Erudiantur ad injustitiam› · col 583

Erudiantur ad injustitiam. Sic res poscit, et omnes fere mss. et editi. Nonnulli scripti et vulgati, ad justitiam, sed male.

"They are trained to injustice." So the matter demands, and almost all the manuscripts and editions. Some manuscripts and common editions have "to justice," but wrongly.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Religiosissimus est cultus, imitari› · col 583

Religiosissimus est cultus, imitari. Augustinus: Summa religionis est imitari eum quem colas. Seneca, ep. XCV: Satis deos coluit, quisquis illum imitatus est.

"The most religious worship is to imitate." Augustine: "The sum of religion is to imitate him whom you worship." Seneca, letter 95: "Whoever has imitated them has worshipped the gods enough."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Iis igitur hominibus› · col 583

Iis igitur hominibus, etc. 3 Reg., 2 Colb., Bodl., Cotton., 1 Clarom., ii igitur homines... quia gravem habent acerbamque justitiam.

"To those men, then," etc. Regius 3, Colbert 2, the Bodleian, the Cotton and Clermont 1 have "those men, then … because they find justice heavy and bitter."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Bestiae nominantur› · col 583

Bestiae nominantur. Vide Ezechielis, c. XXXIV, 5, 8, 25, 28; Sophoniae, c. II, 14 et 15; Exodi, c. XXVI, 6 et 22. Sic etiam Danielis, VII capite, per quatuor animalia, quatuor regna tyrannica describuntur.

"They are called beasts." See Ezekiel 34:5, 8, 25, 28; Zephaniah 2:14 and 15; Exodus 26 (XXVI as printed), 6 and 22. So too in Daniel, chapter 7, four tyrannical kingdoms are described by four beasts.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Praeclare itaque Marcus Tullius› · col 584

Praeclare itaque Marcus Tullius. Hic locus non extat, ait Betuleius, sed similem habes, lib. III, Offic., c. 5.

"Excellently, then, Marcus Tullius." This passage does not survive, says Betuleius, but you have a similar one in On Duties book III, chapter 5.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Emori› · col 584

Emori. Apud Ciceronem, mori.

"To die." In Cicero, "mori."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Figuram bestiae› · col 584

Figuram bestiae. De simili, sed fabulosa hominum in bestias transformatione, vide Plinium, lib. VIII, cap. 22.

"The shape of a beast." On a similar, but fabulous, transformation of men into beasts, see Pliny, book VIII, chapter 22.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Animo esse efferato› · col 584

Animo esse efferato. Ms. Mertoniensis, animum esse efferatum.

"To be of a savage mind." The Merton manuscript has "that the mind is savage."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Saeviores› · col 584

Saeviores. Edit. 1476, Brutiores.

"More savage." The edition of 1476 has "more brutish."

(lemma) ‹anchor: Quis Caucasus› · col 584

Quis Caucasus, etc. Respicit ad illud Didonis, Aen., IV, v. 365: Perfide, sed duris genuit te cautibus horrens Caucasus, Hyrcanaeque admorunt ubera tigres. Caucaso immanitatem tribuunt, propter Promethei fabulam: ego malo propter multitudinem pantherarum, quibus eum Philostr. in vita Apollonii scribit esse refertum. India et Hircania tigride formidabiles sunt. Plin., l. VIII, c. 18. De elephante, tigride et formica Indiae, lege Arrianum, l. VIII, qui est de rebus Indicis. Taceo Heliodorum in sua Theagenis et Charicleae fabula. Betul.

"What Caucasus," etc. He looks back to Dido's words, Aeneid IV, line 365: "Faithless one, rugged Caucasus bore you on its hard crags, and Hyrcanian tigresses gave you suck." They ascribe savagery to the Caucasus because of the fable of Prometheus; I prefer to say because of the number of panthers with which Philostratus, in the Life of Apollonius, writes that it is filled. India and Hyrcania are fearsome for the tiger. Pliny, book VIII, chapter 18. On the elephant, the tiger and the ant of India, read Arrian, book VIII, which is on Indian matters. I say nothing of Heliodorus in his tale of Theagenes and Chariclea. Betuleius.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Illa est vera bestia› · col 584

Illa est vera bestia. Quantum conjecturis locus est dandus, intelligit Diocletianum, cujus edicta et persecutio describuntur ab Eusebio in Ecclesiastica hist., l. VIII, et de Nicomedica praesertim truculentia, c. 5 et 6 ejusdem libri, et de Mortib. persecut.

"That is the true beast." So far as room is to be given to conjecture, he means Diocletian, whose edicts and persecution are described by Eusebius in the Ecclesiastical History, book VIII, and especially the savagery at Nicomedia, chapters 5 and 6 of the same book, and in On the Deaths of the Persecutors.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Jussione› · col 584

Jussione. Sic et infra satellites impiae jussionis. Quae vox non est admodum latina.

"By command." So also below, "the attendants of an impious command." The word is not very Latin.

(lemma) ‹anchor: Funditur› · col 584

Funditur, etc. Virgilius Aeneid., l. IV, v. 646, et l. II, v. 368.

"Is poured," etc. Virgil, Aeneid book IV, line 646, and book II, line 368.

(lemma) ‹anchor: In cineres furit› · col 584

In cineres furit. Ex hoc loco illustratur liber de Mort. pers., c. 21, extr. qui facit, ut de Galerio non minus explicem, quam de Diocletiano, ad quem Betuleius retulerat. Conf. Euseb. Hist. eccles., l. VIII, (continues)

"Rages even against ashes." This place illustrates the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors, end of chapter 21, which makes me explain it of Galerius no less than of Diocletian, to whom Betuleius had referred it. Compare Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History book VIII, (continues)

(printed under page 305)

Page

  • running head: 583 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A nihil tale creduntur mereri; B bus, qui Saturnum? quomodo pudicitiam tuebuntur; C scias. Sic fit ut vitam colentium; D Exprimuntur. Em. Exponuntur (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "Nec est difficile" reads like "Ncc" in the scan; taken as a worn e and set Nec, UNSURE. Column ends mid-sentence at "pro qualitate". "Deum quem colas" / "Deus pro qualitate" are rendered "the god" because they mean whatever god is worshipped. The Variorum Notae at the page foot (Infortunio mactat ... Bestiae nominantur) are left for the later pass. No full-width line.
PL 6:584
nominis sui formet, quoniam religiosissimus est cultus, imitari.
of his own name, since to imitate is the most religious worship.
CAPUT XI.
Chapter XI.
De crudelitate gentilium in christianos.
On the cruelty of the gentiles towards the Christians.
Is igitur hominibus, qui deorum suorum moribus congruunt, quia gravis est et acerba justitia, eamdem impietatem suam, qua in caeteris rebus utuntur, adversus justos violenter exercent. Nec immerito a prophetis bestiae nominantur. Praeclare itaque Marcus Tullius: «Etenim si nemo est, inquit, quin emori malit, quam converti in aliquam figuram bestiae, quamvis hominis mentem sit habiturus; quanto est miserius in hominis figura animo esse efferato? Mihi quidem tanto videtur, quanto praestabilior est animus corpore.» Aspernantur itaque corpora belluarum, quibus sunt ipsi saeviores; sibique adeo placent, quod homines nati sunt, quorum nihil, nisi lineamenta et summam figuram gerunt. Nam quis Caucasus, quae India, quae Hircania tam immanes, tam sanguinarias unquam bestias aluit? Quoniam ferarum omnium rabies usque ad ventris satietatem furit, fameque sedata, protinus conquiescit. Illa est vera bestia, cujus una jussione.
These men, therefore, who conform to the morals of their gods, because to them justice is grave and bitter, violently exercise against the just the same impiety of theirs which they employ in other matters. Nor are they without reason called beasts by the prophets. Excellently, therefore, Marcus Tullius says: «For if there is no one, he says, who would not rather die than be changed into some shape of a beast, even though he were to keep the mind of a man, how much more wretched is it to have a savage mind in the shape of a man? To me indeed it seems so much more wretched, by as much as the mind is superior to the body.» They therefore despise the bodies of beasts, than which they themselves are more savage; and they so please themselves because they were born men, of whom they bear nothing but the features and the outward shape. For what Caucasus, what India, what Hyrcania ever nourished beasts so monstrous, so bloodthirsty? For the rage of all wild beasts rages only until the belly is satisfied, and, once hunger is allayed, at once grows quiet. That is the true beast, at whose single command
Funditur ater ubique cruor... Crudelis ubique / Luctus, ubique pavor, et plurima mortis imago.
Everywhere dark gore is poured out... Everywhere cruel grief, everywhere dread, and death in its many images.
Nemo hujus tantae belluae immanitatem potest pro merito describere, quae uno loco recubans, tamen per totum orbem dentibus ferreis saevit; et non tantum artus hominum dissipat; sed et ossa ipsa comminuit, et in cineres furit, ne quis extet sepulturae locus;
No one can describe as it deserves the monstrousness of so great a beast, which, though lying in one place, nevertheless rages throughout the whole world with iron teeth; and not only tears apart the limbs of men, but even grinds the very bones to pieces, and rages on even to ashes, so that there may not remain any place of burial;
Editors' notes and page, col. 584

Page

  • running head: ...ACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 584 (left edge cut off in the image; presumably LACTANTII)
  • marginal letters: A ‹nominis sui formet›; B ‹quibus sunt ipsi saeviores›; C ‹et in cineres furit›; D ‹fabulam : ego malo› (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: verse quotation (Aen. lines) printed on three indented lines, set as one paragraph with "/" marking the printed line break; last word "lo-" split at the column break (locus); "extet" read from blurred type; Mihi/nihil read where the h is poorly inked; "unquam" looks like "uuquam" in the scan, taken as worn type for n, UNSURE whether it is a real misprint; VARIORUM NOTAE at page foot not set (later pass); left-column fragments belong to col. 583, not set
PL 6:585
quasi vero id affectent, qui Deum confitentur, ut ad eorum sepulcra veniatur, ac non ut ipsi ad Deum perveniant.
as though those who confess God were aiming at this, that people should come to their tombs, and not that they themselves should come to God.
Quaenam illa feritas, quae rabies, quae insania est, lucem vivis, terram mortuis denegasse? Dico igitur nihil esse miserius iis hominibus, quos ministros furoris alieni, quos satellites impiae jus⟨s⟩ionis necessitas aut invenit, aut fecit. Non enim honor ille, aut provectio dignitatis fuit, sed hominis damnatio ad carnificinam, Dei vero ad poenam sempiternam. Quae autem per totum orbem singuli gesserint, enarrare impossibile est. Quis enim voluminum numerus capiet tam infinita, tam varia genera crudelitatis? Accepta enim potestate, pro suis moribus quisque saeviit. Alii prae nimia timiditate plus ausi sunt, quam jubebatur: alii suo proprio adversus justos odio; quidam naturali mentis feritate; nonnulli ut placerent, et hoc officio viam sibi ad altiora munirent. Aliqui ad occidendum praecipites extiterunt, sicut unus in Phrygia, qui universum populum cum ipso pariter conventiculo concremavit. Sed hic quanto saevior, tanto clementior invenitur. Illud vero pessimum genus est, cui clementiae species falsa blanditur: ille gravior, ille saevior est carnifex, qui neminem statuit occidere. Itaque dici non potest, hujusmodi judices quanta et quam gravia tormentorum genera excogitaverint,
What savagery is that, what rage, what madness, to have denied light to the living and earth to the dead? I say therefore that nothing is more wretched than those men whom necessity either found or made the ministers of another's fury, the attendants of an impious command. For that was no honour, nor an advancement in rank, but a condemnation by man to the work of the executioner, and by God to everlasting punishment. But what individuals did throughout the whole world it is impossible to recount. For what number of volumes will contain such infinite, such varied kinds of cruelty? For once power had been received, each raged according to his own character. Some through excessive timidity dared more than was commanded; others through their own hatred against the just; some through a natural savagery of mind; some in order to please, and by this service to build themselves a road to higher things. Some showed themselves headlong to kill, like a certain man in Phrygia who burned up a whole people together with their very meeting-place. But this man, the more savage he was, the more merciful he is found to be. That kind, however, is the worst, which a false appearance of clemency flatters: that man is the heavier, that man the more savage executioner, who has resolved to kill no one. And so it cannot be told how many and how grievous kinds of tortures judges of this sort devised,
Editors' notes and page, col. 585

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 306)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page)› · col 585

(continued) c. 5 et 6. Ita sub Juliano narratur in Ammian. Marcellin., l. XXII, c. 11: Iisdem... subdito igne crematis, cineres projecit (multitudo) in mare, id metuens, ut clamabat, ne collectis supremis, aedes illis exstruerentur, ut reliquis, qui deviare a religione compulsi pertulere cruciabiles poenas, adusque gloriosam mortem intemerata fide progressi, et nunc martyres appellantur. BUN.

(printed under page 306)

(2) ‹anchor: Sepulturae locus› · col 585

Sepulturae locus. Intelligit haud dubie Dorotheum, Petrum et Gorgonium, qui cum aulici essent, eorum tamen corpora misere excarnificata, terrae mandata sunt, mox jussu tyranni effossa et in mare projecta: de quibus Eusebius.

A place of burial. He doubtless means Dorotheus, Peter and Gorgonius, who were courtiers; yet their bodies, wretchedly mangled, were committed to the earth, and soon by the tyrant's order dug up and thrown into the sea: of whom Eusebius writes.

(printed under page 306)

(3) ‹anchor: Terram mortuis› · col 585

Terram mortuis. Vide S. Augustinum, de Civit. Dei, l. I, c. 12.

Earth to the dead. See St Augustine, The City of God, book I, ch. 12.

(printed under page 306)

(4) ‹anchor: Provectio› · col 585

Provectio. Requiro adhuc majorem hujus vocis apud veteres auctoritatem: a Kresbio de Stylo Lact., et a Walchio in Diatribe non est notata. Provehere ad dignitatem est Plinii in Epistolis. BUN.

Advancement. I still look for stronger authority for this word among the ancients: it is not noted by Kresse in his "On the Style of Lactantius", nor by Walch in his Diatribe. To advance to a dignity is Pliny's, in the Letters. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 306)

(5) ‹anchor: Genera crudelitatis› · col 585

Genera crudelitatis. Haec vide in Actis martyrum, quae collegit vir aeque doctissimus ac piissimus, Theodoricus Ruynart e congregatione S. Mauri Benedictinus.

Kinds of cruelty. See these in the Acts of the Martyrs, collected by a man as learned as he was devout, Thierry Ruinart, Benedictine of the Congregation of St Maur.

(printed under page 306)

(6) ‹anchor: Quisque saeviit› · col 585

Quisque saeviit. Sic ex mss. antiquissimis 1 Bon., Cauc., Betul., 2 Colb. et ed. Cellar. Suavius fluit, quam saevivit 3 Regiorum, Marm. totidemque editorum. Scripti 12 rec. habent saevit; 5 rec., quique saeviunt.

Each raged. So from the very old manuscripts, 1 Bologna, Cauc., Betuleius, 2 Colbert, and Cellarius's edition. It runs more smoothly than saevivit of 3 Royal manuscripts, Marm. and as many editions. 12 recent manuscripts have saevit; 5 recent, quique saeviunt.

(printed under page 306)

(7) ‹anchor: Prae nimia timiditate› · col 585

Prae nimia timiditate. Ita mss. 8 Reg. inter quos sunt duo antiquissimi, Cauc., 5 Colb. aliique, cum editis 13, quod est ministris et servis convenientius, ne minus fecisse, quam jussi erant, viderentur. Scripti 5, tumiditate. Nemo enim crudelior quam timidus homo, cum viribus superiorem se putat. Idem fere est, l. de Mortib. Persecut., c. 11: Quidam proprio adversus christianos odio tollendos esse censuerunt, et qui aliter sentiebant, intellecta imperatoris voluntate, vel timentes, vel gratificari volentes, in eamdem sententiam congruerunt.

From excessive timidity. So 8 Royal manuscripts, among them two very old, Cauc., 5 Colbert and others, with 13 editions; this better suits ministers and servants, lest they seem to have done less than they were ordered. 5 manuscripts read tumiditate (swollen pride). For no one is crueller than a timid man when he thinks himself superior in strength. Almost the same is in the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors, ch. 11: "Some, from their own hatred of the Christians, judged that they should be done away with; and those who thought otherwise, once the emperor's will was understood, whether from fear or wishing to please, fell in with the same opinion."

(printed under page 306)

(8) ‹anchor: Quam jubebatur› · col 585

Quam jubebatur. Duo rec. manu exarati codices, jubeatur; 7 rec. et totidem editi, jubebantur; 3 rec., videbantur, mendose.

Than was ordered. Two recent handwritten codices, jubeatur; 7 recent and as many editions, jubebantur; 3 recent, videbantur, faultily.

(printed under page 306)

(9) ‹anchor: Aliqui› · col 586

Aliqui. Hanc vocem delet Heum.

Some. Heumann deletes this word.

(printed under page 306)

(10) ‹anchor: In Phrygia› · col 586

In Phrygia. Historiam vide apud Eusebium, Hist. eccl., l. VIII, c. 11.

In Phrygia. See the story in Eusebius, Church History, book VIII, ch. 11.

(printed under page 306)

(11) ‹anchor: Cum ipso pariter conventiculo› · col 586

Cum ipso pariter conventiculo. Historia extat apud Euseb. Caeterum prisci christiani non habebant templa, sed conventicula, aedes, etc. abhorrebant enim a templi nomine, quo utebantur gentiles.

Together with the meeting-house itself. The story is in Eusebius. The early Christians, however, had no temples but meeting-houses, houses, etc.; for they shrank from the name of temple, which the pagans used.

(printed under page 306)

(12) ‹anchor: Tanto clementior› · col 586

Tanto clementior. Mss. 11 rec. cum edit. Rom. 1468, dementior, male. Caeteri, inter quos sunt antiquissimi, habent clementior. Brevitatem enim supplicii, combustionis scilicet, clementiam vocat respectu lentae et protractioris necis.

So much the more merciful. 11 recent manuscripts with the Rome edition of 1468 read dementior (more insane), wrongly. The rest, among them the oldest, have clementior. For he calls the brevity of the punishment, that is, of burning, mercy, in comparison with a slow and more drawn-out death.

(printed under page 306)

(13) ‹anchor: In excogitandis poenarum generibus› · col 586

In excogitandis poenarum generibus. Cyprianus contra Demetrianum: Admoves laniandis corporibus longa tormenta, multiplicas lacerandis visceribus numerosa supplicia, nec feritas ac immanitas tua usitatis potest contenta esse tormentis: excogitat novas poenas ingeniosa crudelitas. Conf. Lact., l. VI, c. 17; epit., c. 54; Senec., l. 1; Clem., c. 25 (Saevitia): Nova supplicia conquirit, ingenium advocat, instrumenta excogitat, per quae varietur atque extendatur dolor, etc. BUN.

In devising kinds of punishment. Cyprian, Against Demetrianus: "You apply long tortures to bodies to be torn, you multiply numerous punishments for flesh to be lacerated, nor can your savagery and brutality be content with the usual tortures": an ingenious cruelty devises new pains. Compare Lactantius, book VI, ch. 17; Epitome, ch. 54; Seneca, book 1, On Mercy, ch. 25 (Cruelty): "It seeks out new punishments, summons its wit, devises instruments by which pain may be varied and prolonged," etc. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 306)

(14) ‹anchor: Victoriam cogitant› · col 586

Victoriam cogitant. Ita cum edit. vet. Rom. omnes mss. praeter 1 Reg. rec., in quo, sicut et in caeteris editis, est excogitant.

They think of victory. So, with the old Rome edition, all the manuscripts except 1 recent Royal, in which, as in the other editions, is excogitant.

(printed under page 306)

(15) ‹anchor: Visus esset› · col 586

Visus esset. Codices 5 rec. manu exarati et 9 typis excusi, visus est.

Had seemed. 5 recent handwritten codices and 9 printed ones, visus est.

(printed under page 306)

(16) ‹anchor: Nihil aliud devitant› · col 586

Nihil aliud devitant. Sic mss. 2 antiquissimi, 1 Reg. et Cauc., 2 alii Reg. multique alii et 8 editi. Scripti 14 rec. et 5 excusi, aliud evitant; 1 Bonon. et 1 Reg. antiquiss. aliud vitant.

They avoid nothing else. So 2 very old manuscripts, 1 Royal and Cauc., 2 other Royal and many others, and 8 editions. 14 recent manuscripts and 5 printed, aliud evitant; 1 Bologna and 1 very old Royal, aliud vitant.

(printed under page 306)

(17) ‹anchor: Torti moriantur› · col 586

Torti moriantur. In ipso supplicio.

Die under torture. In the very punishment.

(printed under page 306)

(18) ‹anchor: Tormenta quanto fuerint› · col 586

Tormenta quanto fuerint. Ita restituo ex Lips. secundo, Reimm., Rost., Ven. 1471, 72, utraque 78, 93, 97, Parrh., Paris., Junt., Ald., Crat., Gymn., Tornes., Betul., Fasit., Gryph., pro recentiorum Thomasii, Isaei, Thys., Gall., Spark., Cell., Walch.: Tormenta, quae quanto... pariant. Si voluissent post tormenta subaudire beatos faciant, debuissent pariunt edere, non pariant. BUN.

Torments, the more they were. So I restore from the second Leipzig, Reimmann, Rostock, Venice 1471, 72, both of 78, 93, 97, Parrhasius, Paris, Junta, Aldus, Cratander, Gymnicus, Tornaesius, Betuleius, Fasitelius, Gryphius, against the more recent Thomasius, Isaeus, Thysius, Gallaeus, Sparke, Cellarius, Walch: Tormenta, quae quanto... pariant. If they had wished to understand beatos faciant after tormenta, they ought to have printed pariunt, not pariant. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 306)

(19) ‹anchor: Constitutiones› · col 586

Constitutiones. Quae scilicet ab Eusebio recitantur, (continues)

Decrees. Namely those quoted by Eusebius, (continues)

(printed under page 306)

Page

  • running head: 585 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹cus; quasi vero id affectent›; B ‹jubebatur : alii suo proprio›; C ‹cineres projecit (multitudo) in mare› (in the Variorum notae); D ‹clinus.› (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "cus;" of a word broken from the previous column; column ends mid-word "excogita-" (excogitaverint, continued in the next column); "jus⟨s⟩ionis" has a damaged s; "crudelitatis": the i looks like an l (probably a broken or dotless i), so it is set as crudelitatis, UNSURE; full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" stands above the notes and is not set; Variorum notae at the page foot are not set (they belong to a later pass); signature "PATROL. VI." is not set
PL 6:586
ut ad effectum propositi sui pervenirent.
so that they might arrive at the accomplishment of their purpose.
Haec autem non tantum ideo faciunt, ut gloriari possint, nullum se innocentium peremisse (nam et ipse audivi aliquos gloriantes, quod administratio sua in hac parte fuerit incruenta), sed et invidiae causa; ne aut ipsi vincantur, aut illi virtutis suae gloriam consequantur. Itaque in excogitandis poenarum generibus, nihil aliud quam victoriam cogitant. Sciunt enim certamen esse illud, et pugnam. Vidi ego in Bythynia praesidem gaudio mirabiliter elatum, tamquam barbarorum gentem aliquam subegisset; quod unus, qui per biennium magna virtute restiterat, postremo cedere visus esset. Contendunt igitur ut vincant, et exquisitos dolores corporibus immittunt, et nihil aliud devitant, quam ut ne torti moriantur. Quasi vero mors tantummodo beatos faciat, ac non etiam tormenta, quae quanto fuerint graviora, tanto majorem virtutis gloriam pariant. Illi autem pertinaci stultitia jubent, curam tortis diligenter adhiberi, ut ad alios cruciatus membra renoventur, et reparetur novus sanguis ad poenam. Quid tam pium, tam beneficum, tam humanum fieri potest? non curassent tam sollicite, quos amarent. Haec est deorum disciplina. Ad haec opera cultores suos erudiunt; haec sacra desiderant. Quin etiam sceleratissimi homicidae contra pios jura impia condiderunt. Nam et constitutiones sacrilegae, et disputationes
And they do these things not only for this reason, that they may be able to boast that they have put to death none of the innocent (for I myself have heard some boasting that their administration had been bloodless in this respect), but also out of envy, lest either they themselves be conquered, or those men attain the glory of their virtue. And so in devising kinds of punishments they think of nothing other than victory. For they know that this is a contest and a fight. I saw in Bithynia a governor wonderfully elated with joy, as though he had subdued some nation of barbarians, because one man, who had resisted with great courage for two years, at last seemed to yield. They strive therefore to conquer, and they inflict exquisite pains on bodies, and they avoid nothing else than that the tortured should die. As if indeed death alone made [men] blessed, and not torments also, which, the more severe they have been, produce so much the greater glory of virtue. But they, with obstinate folly, order that care be diligently given to the tortured, so that their limbs may be renewed for other torments, and fresh blood restored for punishment. What can be done so pious, so beneficent, so humane? They would not have cared so anxiously for those whom they loved. This is the discipline of the gods. To these works they train their worshippers; these are the rites they desire. Moreover, most wicked murderers have even framed impious laws against the pious. For both sacrilegious ordinances and disputations
Editors' notes and page, col. 586

Page

  • running head: V. DE JUSTITIA. 586 (left part of head cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹verint, ut ad effectum›; B ‹tantummodo beatos faciat›; C ‹eccl., l. VIII, c. 11› (in the Variorum notae); D ‹Victoriam cogitant› (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "verint", the end of a word broken from col. 585, left untranslated in the English; last word "dis-" is broken at the column break (probably disputationes); "Bythynia" is set as printed (Bithynia), a spelling variant and not certainly a misprint; the VARIORUM NOTAE heading at the page foot runs across both columns and is cut off at the left edge, so it is not set; the Variorum notae (Aliqui ... Constitutiones) belong to the apparatus and are left for the later pass
PL 6:587
jurisperitorum leguntur injustae. Domitius, de officio proconsulis libro septimo, rescripta principum nefaria collegit, ut doceret, quibus poenis affici oporteret eos qui se cultores Dei confiterentur.
of the jurists are read, unjust ones. Domitius, in the seventh book On the Office of Proconsul, collected the wicked rescripts of the emperors, in order to teach with what punishments those ought to be visited who confessed themselves worshippers of God.
CAPUT XII.
Chapter XII.
De vera virtute ; atque de existimatione boni aut mali civis.
On true virtue; and on the estimation of a good or bad citizen.
Quid iis facias, qui jus vocant carnificinas veterum tyrannorum adversus innocentes rabide saevientium? Et cum sint injustitiae crudelitatisque doctores, justos se esse tamen ac prudentes videri volunt, caeci et hebetes, et rerum et veritatis ignari. Adeone vobis, o perditae mentes, invisa justitia est, ut eam summis sceleribus adaequetis ? Adeone apud vos perit innocentia, ut ne morte quidem simplici dignam judicetis ? Sed supra omnia facinora habeatur, nullum facinus admittere, pectusque purum ab omni sceleris contagione praestare. Et quoniam commuuiter cum deorum cultoribus loquimur, liceat per vos benefacere vobiscum. Haec est enim lex nostra, hoc opus, haec religio. Si vobis sapientes videmur, imitamini : si stulti, contemnite, aut etiam ridete, si libet ; nobis enim stultitia nostra prodest. Quid laceratis ? quid affligitis ? non invidemus sapientiae vestrae. Hanc stultitiam malumus : hanc amplectimur. Hoc nobis credimus expedire, ut vos diligamus, et in vos ipsos, qui odistis, omnia conferamus.
What are you to do with those who call by the name of law the butcheries of the ancient tyrants raging madly against the innocent? And though they are teachers of injustice and cruelty, they nevertheless wish to seem just and prudent, blind and dull as they are, and ignorant both of things and of the truth. Is justice so hateful to you, O lost minds, that you make it equal to the greatest crimes? Does innocence so perish among you that you judge it not worthy even of a simple death? But let it be held above all crimes to commit no crime, and to keep the breast pure from all contagion of wickedness. And since we are speaking in general with the worshippers of the gods, let it be permitted by you that we do good to you. For this is our law, this our work, this our religion. If we seem wise to you, imitate us; if foolish, despise us, or even laugh, if you please; for our folly profits us. Why do you mangle us? why do you afflict us? We do not envy your wisdom. This folly we prefer; this we embrace. We believe this to be advantageous to us, that we love you, and bestow all things upon you yourselves, who hate us.
Est apud Ciceronem non abhorrens a vero locus, in ea disputatione, quae habetur a Furio contra justitiam. « Quaero, inquit, si duo sint, quorum alter optimus vir, aequissimus, summa justitia, singulari fide ;
There is in Cicero a passage not far removed from the truth, in that disputation which is held by Furius against justice. 'I ask,' he says, 'if there are two men, of whom one is a most excellent man, most equitable, of the highest justice, of singular good faith;
Editors' notes and page, col. 587

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed. The note(s) carried over from page 306 do not reappear at the head of this foot. --> (printed under page 307)

(1) ‹anchor: Domitius› · col 587

Domitius. Ulpianus scilicet, Adriani imperatoris Scriniorum magister, secundo vixit saeculo, atque Tyrius erat. Hujus de principum rescriptis erant olim libri decem: sed quorum nihil hodie superest, nisi fragmenta, in titul. de Officio proconsulis.

Domitius. That is, Ulpian, master of the bureaux under the emperor Hadrian; he lived in the second century and was a Tyrian. He once had ten books on the rescripts of the emperors, of which nothing survives today but fragments, in the title On the Office of Proconsul.

(printed under page 307)

(2) ‹anchor: Libro septimo› · col 587

Libro septimo. Ita mss. 1 Bon. antiq., 1 Reg. antiq. et alii 23 cum excusis 12. Et hanc lectionem probant Cujacius libro X Observat., c. 34, et Thomasius in notis. In editis quinque est libris septem; in Regio-Put., Cauc., 1 Clarom., l. VII quod bifariam legi potest.

In the seventh book. So the old Bologna manuscript, 1 old Royal and 23 others, with 12 printed editions. And Cujas, Observations book X, ch. 34, and Thomasius in his notes approve this reading. In five editions it is libris septem (in seven books); in Regio-Puteanus, Cauc., 1 Clermont, "l. VII", which can be read either way.

(printed under page 307)

(3) ‹anchor: Rescripta principum nefaria› · col 587

Rescripta principum nefaria. Ex omnibus mss. et editis ferme reposui vocem principum, quae nonnullis vulgatis deest. In 1 Reg. antiquissimo legitur scripta principum nefaria. In quibusdam editis deest principum.

The emperors' wicked rescripts. From all the manuscripts and nearly all editions I have restored the word principum, which is missing in some common editions. In 1 very old Royal one reads scripta principum nefaria. In some editions principum is missing.

(printed under page 307)

(4) ‹anchor: Quid iis facias› · col 587

Quid iis facias. Ita passim Lactantius.

What you should do to them. So Lactantius throughout.

(printed under page 307)

(5) ‹anchor: Prudentes› · col 587

Prudentes. Pungit hic Lactant. jureconsultos, qui olim prudentes vocabantur. — Justos se esse tamen... videri volunt. Goth. esse non habet. Rost., Ven., utraque 1478, 1515, Paris., Crat., Gymn., justos esse se tamen. Reimm. et reliqui, justos se esse... volunt. De hoc archaismo Conf. not. ad l. V, c. 20, et ad l. de Mort. Persec., c. 14. BUN.

The learned. Here Lactantius stings the jurists, who were once called prudentes. — Yet they want to seem to be just... The Gotha manuscript lacks esse. Rostock, Venice, both of 1478, 1515, Paris, Cratander, Gymnicus: justos esse se tamen. Reimmann and the rest: justos se esse... volunt. On this archaism compare the notes on book V, ch. 20, and on the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors, ch. 14. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 307)

(6) ‹anchor: Sceleris contagione› · col 587

Sceleris contagione. Mss. 2 Reg. et 5 Oxon., cogitatione.

From the contagion of crime. 2 Royal and 5 Oxford manuscripts, cogitatione (thought).

(printed under page 307)

(7) ‹anchor: Communiter cum... loquimur› · col 587

Communiter cum... loquimur. Mihi non incommode videtur hic valere in genere, in universum; non cum his illisve tantum: ita maneret antiqua elegantia. Ita auctor Epithalamii Maximiano et Constantino dicti, c. 3, Communiter dicere, et c. 13, separatim loqui opponit. BUN.

We speak in common with... It seems to me not unfitting that here it means in general, as a whole; not with these or those only: so the ancient elegance would remain. So the author of the Epithalamium spoken for Maximian and Constantine sets communiter dicere (ch. 3) against separatim loqui (ch. 13). BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 307)

(8) ‹anchor: Liceat per vos benefacere vobiscum› · col 588

Liceat per vos benefacere vobiscum. Ita cum 2 antiquissimis Reg. multisque aliis manuscriptis editi duodecim. Scripti 5 rec. et vulgati 4, per vos benefacere nobiscum, mss. 5 et edd. Rom. 1470, per nos benefacere vobiscum; quinque manu exarati et edit. Basil. 1532, per nos benefacere nobiscum.

Let it be lawful, by your leave, to do good with you. So twelve editions, with 2 very old Royal and many other manuscripts. 5 recent manuscripts and 4 common editions, per vos benefacere nobiscum; 5 manuscripts and the Rome edition of 1470, per nos benefacere vobiscum; five handwritten and the Basel edition of 1532, per nos benefacere nobiscum.

(printed under page 307)

(9) ‹anchor: Nobis enim stultitia nostra prodest› · col 588

Nobis enim stultitia nostra prodest. Mss. 6 Reg., 2 Colbert., Brun., vobis, etc. Utraque lectio habet sensum suum. Prior lectio nobis melior videtur. Vid. seq.

For our folly profits us. 6 Royal, 2 Colbert and Brun. manuscripts, vobis (you), etc. Each reading has its own sense. The former seems better to us. See the following.

(printed under page 307)

(10) ‹anchor: Qui odistis› · col 588

Qui odistis. Cum Francio libenter legerem, qui nos odistis.

Who hate. With Franck I would gladly read qui nos odistis (who hate us).

(printed under page 307)

(11) ‹anchor: Quae habetur a Furio contra justitiam› · col 588

Quae habetur a Furio contra justitiam. Vide S. Augustinum, l. II de Civit. Dei, c. 21. Locus ille ex Cicerone, lib. III de Republica depromptus est. Hic Lactantius eximie refellit paradoxon L. Furii Philonis oratoris, qui optabat magis sapiens et probus videri, cum foret malus, quam malus existimari, cum foret bonus. Caeterum personas, quae in libris de Republica loquebantur, recenset Cic., l. IV Epist. ad Atticum, ep. XV.

Which is delivered by Furius against justice. See St Augustine, City of God, book II, ch. 21. That passage is drawn from Cicero, On the Republic, book III. Here Lactantius admirably refutes the paradox of the orator L. Furius Philus, who wished rather to seem wise and upright when he was wicked, than to be thought wicked when he was good. Cicero lists the speakers in the books On the Republic in Letters to Atticus, book IV, letter XV.

(printed under page 307)

(12) ‹anchor: Alter insignis scelere et audacia› · col 588

Alter insignis scelere et audacia. Ita cum 3 vet. edit. Rom. et Cellar. Mss. novem: quod melius respondet praecedentibus, quam insigni scelere, 13 manuscriptorum et 16 impressorum.

The other notable for crime and audacity. So nine manuscripts, with 3 old Rome editions and Cellarius: which answers better to what precedes than insigni scelere, of 13 manuscripts and 16 printed editions.

(printed under page 307)

(13) ‹anchor: Existimet› · col 588

Existimet. Sic omnes prope mss. inter quos sunt antiquissimi, et vet. edit. ac Cellar. et Walch. Ms. Lips. existimat; 1 Reg. rec. et Brun., aestimet; 1 Reg. rec. et sex edit., existimetur.

Should think. So nearly all the manuscripts, among them the oldest, and the old editions, and Cellarius and Walch. The Leipzig manuscript, existimat; 1 recent Royal and Brun., aestimet; 1 recent Royal and six editions, existimetur.

(printed under page 307)

(14) ‹anchor: Omnibus miserrimus esse videatur› · col 588

Omnibus miserrimus esse videatur. 2 Colb. et Em., omnium.

Should seem to all most wretched. 2 Colbert and Em., omnium (of all).

(printed under page 307)

(15) ‹anchor: Eventura essent› · col 588

Eventura essent. 1 Reg. rec. et 13 editi, ventura.

Would come about. 1 recent Royal and 13 editions, ventura.

(printed under page 307)

(16) ‹anchor: Sua sibi habeant regna reges› · col 588

Sua sibi habeant regna reges, suas divitias divites, etc. (continues)

Let kings keep their kingdoms to themselves, the rich their riches, etc. (continues)

(printed under page 307)

Page

  • running head: 587 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A putationes jurisperitorum leguntur injustae; B tia, ut ne morte quidem; C tiam. « Quaero, inquit (letter stands low, between this line and "mus vir"); D in the notes, beside "vulgatis deest. In 1 Reg."
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 6:588
alter insignis scelere et audacia: et si in eo sit errore civitas, ut bonum illum virum, sceleratum, facinorosum, nefarium putet, contra autem, qui sit improbissimus, existimet esse summa probitate, ac fide; proque hac opinione omnium civium, bonus ille vir vexetur, rapiatur, manus ei denique auferantur, effodiantur oculi, damnetur, vinciatur, uratur, exterminetur, egeat postremo, jure etiam optimo omnibus miserrimus esse videatur: contra autem ille improbus laudetur, colatur, ab omnibus diligatur; omnes ad eum honores, omnia imperia, omnes opes, omnes denique copiae conferantur; vir denique optimus omnium existimatione, et dignissimus omni fortuna judicetur: quis tandem erit tam demens, qui dubitet utrum se esse malit.» Profecto quasi divinaret, quae nobis mala, et quomodo eventura essent propter justitiam, hoc posuit exemplum. Haec enim populus noster patitur omnia, errantium pravitate. Ecce in eo est errore civitas, vel potius orbis ipse totus, ut bonos et justos viros, tamquam malos et impios, persequatur, excruciet, damnet, occidat. Nam quod ait, neminem esse tam dementem, qui dubitet utrum se esse malit; ille quidem, ut is qui contra justitiam disserebat, hoc sensit, malle sapientem malum esse cum bona existimatione, quam bonum cum mala.
the other distinguished for wickedness and audacity; and if the city is in such error that it thinks that good man wicked, criminal and abominable, and on the other hand believes the one who is most dishonest to be of the highest probity and good faith; and in accordance with this opinion of all the citizens that good man is harassed, seized, his hands finally cut off, his eyes gouged out, is condemned, bound, burned, banished, is at last in want, and with the fullest justice seems to all to be the most wretched of men; while on the other hand that wicked man is praised, honoured, loved by all, and all honours, all commands, all riches, in short all resources are conferred upon him, and he is finally judged in the estimation of all to be the best of men and most worthy of every good fortune: who, pray, will be so mad as to doubt which of the two he would rather be?' Surely, as if he were divining what evils were to befall us, and how they would come about on account of justice, he set forth this example. For our people suffer all these things through the depravity of those who are in error. See, the city, or rather the whole world itself, is in such error that it persecutes, tortures, condemns and kills good and just men as though they were wicked and impious. For as to his saying that no one is so mad as to doubt which of the two he would rather be, he indeed, as one who was arguing against justice, meant this: that the wise man would rather be bad with a good reputation than good with a bad one.
A nobis autem absit haec amentia, ut falsum vero anteponamus. An boni nostri qualitas ex populi potius pendebit erroribus, quam ex conscientia nostra, et judicio Dei? Aut aliqua nos illiciet umquam felicitas, ut non potius veram bonitatem cum omni malo, quam falsam cum omni prosperitate malimus? Sua sibi habeant regna reges, suas divitias divites (ut loquitur
But far from us be this madness, that we should set the false before the true. Will the quality of our goodness depend on the errors of the people rather than on our own conscience and the judgement of God? Or will any happiness ever entice us so that we would not rather choose true goodness with every evil than false goodness with every prosperity? Let kings keep their kingdoms to themselves, the rich their riches (in the words of
Editors' notes and page, col. 588

Page

  • running head: ACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 588 (initial L cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹alter insignis scelere›; B ‹nobis mala, et quomodo›; C ‹quam falsam cum omni›; D ‹Cicerone, lib. III de Republica› (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence inside a quotation (Cicero, De Republica III via Furius) and ends mid-word "lo-"; "et" in "et audacia", "et si" appears with a broken t ("el"), set as et; "ineo" printed tight, set "in eo"; full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE." below the text not set; Variorum Notae at page foot (Liceat per vos benefacere vobiscum ... Sua sibi habeant regna reges) left for later pass
PL 6:589
Plautus), suam vero prudentium prudentes : relinquant nobis stultitiam nostram, quam vel ex hoc apparet esse sapientiam, quod eam nobis invident. Quis enim stulto invideat, nisi qui sit ipse stultissimus ? Illi autem non sunt adeo stulti, ut stultis invideant : sed ex eo, quod accurate, quod sollicite persequuntur, stultos non esse concedunt. Cur enim tam crudeliter saeviant, nisi quia metuunt, ne in dies invalescente justitia, cum diis suis cariosis relinquantur ? Si ergo cultores deorum sapientes sunt, et nos stulti, quid metuant, ne sapientes illiciantur a stultis ?
Plautus), and the prudent their own prudence: let them leave us our folly, which is evident to be wisdom even from this, that they envy us it. For who would envy a fool, unless he who is himself most foolish? But they are not so foolish as to envy fools: rather, from the fact that they pursue us so carefully, so anxiously, they concede that we are not fools. For why would they rage so cruelly, unless because they fear that, as justice grows stronger day by day, they will be left alone with their worm-eaten gods? If, then, the worshippers of the gods are wise, and we are foolish, why should they fear that the wise may be enticed away by fools?
CAPUT XIII.
Chapter XIII.
De Christianorum incrementis et suppliciis.
On the increase of the Christians and their punishments.
Cum autem noster numerus semper de deorum cultoribus augeatur, nunquam vero, ne in ipsa quidem persecutione minuatur (quoniam peccare homines, et inquinari sacrificio possunt, averti autem non possunt a Deo; valet enim vi sua veritas); quis est tandem
But since our number is always increased from among the worshippers of the gods, yet is never diminished, not even in persecution itself (since men can sin and be defiled by sacrifice, but cannot be turned away from God; for truth prevails by its own force), who, then, is
Editors' notes and page, col. 589

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 308)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page)› · col 589

(continued) Plautus in Curcullione, act. I, scen. III, v. 22. Sic et Paulinus episcopus Nolanus, epist. I, novae editionis J. B. le Brun (alias 6), n. 7: Fruantur interim voluptatibus, dignitatibus, opibus suis; nobis inopiam nostram, ut putant, et stultitiam nostram relinquant.

(printed under page 308)

(2) ‹anchor: Persequuntur› · col 589

Persequuntur. Ita mss. 10 Reg., 4 Colbert. aliique quamplurimi. At mss. Bonon., Tax., 1 Colb., 2 Clarom. et edit. Fasit., prosequuntur.

They persecute. So 10 Royal manuscripts, 4 Colbert and very many others. But the Bologna, Tax., 1 Colbert, 2 Clermont manuscripts and Fasitelius's edition, prosequuntur.

(printed under page 308)

(3) ‹anchor: Cum diis suis cariosis› · col 589

Cum diis suis cariosis. Id est, qui carie et putredine dilabuntur. Sic Arnobius, l. VI, ait signa deorum carie relaxari. Hanc lectionem ut meliorem elegi, quam habent cum edit. Ald. 1535 Ms. 1 Reg. 900 annor. aliique recentior. In duobus item aliis utriusque aetatis desideratur illa vox. Nostram lectionem approbant Isaeus et Francius; eique favent edit. Gymnic., Tornes., Soubron., Betul., Fasit., 2 Paris. in quibus est curiosis, 2 Colb., Marm., Cant., variosis. Accedunt 2 Reg. rec., 1 Colb., Em., 1 Clarom., qui legunt nariosis; 2 Bonon., 2 Reg., 2 Colb. et excusi 4 habent narinosis; Jun. narosis, 1 Sorbon. narinosos; sic dictos, ut volunt, quod naribus odores imbibant; 2 Reg., Tornes., 5 Oxon. ed. Rom. 1470, varicosis. Ultr. nanosis, 1 Colb. et 1 Brun. vanosis; 1 Reg., Vict., Gatian., Nav., alter Brun. ventosis; 1 Colb. viciosis. Editio Coloniensis anni 1544 legit ex mss.: Cum diis suis (quos narinosos appellant, quod odoribus thuris colantur) narinosis relinquantur. Haec interpretatio, in textum irrepsit. Ad marginem legitur varicosis et curiosis: rectius leges diis cariosis, id est, qui a vermibus et tineis, vel corroduntur, vel corrosi sunt: ita apud Columellam terra cariosa. Caries enim est infestatio vermium. — Mirum in modum hic locus in libris variatur. Jo. Clerici ex Art. Crit., part. III, sect. I, c. 8, n. 9; conjecturam araneosis receperat Cellarius. Certe Tertullianus in Apologetico, c. 12, dixit, christianos laudem mereri, si statuas et imagines frigidas mortuorum suorum simillimas non adorent, quas milvi, mures, et araneae intelligant. Arnob., lib. VI, p. 202: Non (id est, nonne videtis) in ore simulacri ab araneis ordiri retia atque insidiosos casses? etc. Minuc., c. 24: Araneae faciem ejus (idoli) intexunt, et de ipso capite sua fila suspendunt. Nihilominus cum Isaeo, Gall., Spark., Heumanno praetuli cariosis; nam non tantum ligno, quod Cellarius hic putavit, sed et aliis tribuitur caries. Hinc Phaedr., l. V, fab. X, v. 5, de cane scripsit, cariosis dentibus. Immo Arnobius, l. VI, p. 202: (deorum) signa... putredinis modo CARIE relaxare; et hoc amplius Prudentius, lib. I, contra Symmach., v. 433-434: Non patiar ut cariosorum venereris monstra deorum. Sed sagax, ut inquit Plautus, nasum habeat necesse est, qui veram hic scripturam odorari voluerit. BUN.

With their rotten gods. That is, gods that fall apart with rot and decay. So Arnobius, book VI, says "the images of the gods are loosened by rot." I chose this reading as the better one, which 1 Royal manuscript of 900 years and other more recent ones have, with the Aldine edition of 1535. In two others, of either age, the word is missing. Isaeus and Franck approve our reading; and the editions of Gymnicus, Tornaesius, Soubron, Betuleius, Fasitelius and 2 Paris ones favour it, in which is curiosis; 2 Colbert, Marm., Cant., variosis. Add 2 recent Royal, 1 Colbert, Em., 1 Clermont, which read nariosis; 2 Bologna, 2 Royal, 2 Colbert and 4 printed have narinosis; Junta narosis, 1 Sorbonne narinosos; so called, as they would have it, because they drink in scents through their nostrils; 2 Royal, Tornaesius, 5 Oxford, the Rome edition of 1470, varicosis. Utrecht nanosis, 1 Colbert and 1 Brun. vanosis; 1 Royal, Victor., Gatian., Navarre, the other Brun. ventosis; 1 Colbert viciosis. The Cologne edition of 1544 reads from manuscripts: "Let them be left with their gods (whom they call 'nosy', because they are worshipped with the smells of incense), the nosy ones." This interpretation crept into the text. In the margin one reads varicosis and curiosis: you will read more correctly diis cariosis, that is, gods which are being, or have been, gnawed by worms and moths: so in Columella terra cariosa (crumbling earth). For caries is an infestation of worms. — This passage varies wonderfully in the books. Cellarius had adopted Jean Le Clerc's conjecture araneosis (cobwebbed), from the Ars Critica, part III, section I, ch. 8, no. 9. Certainly Tertullian in the Apology, ch. 12, said that Christians deserve praise if "they do not adore statues and cold images, most like their dead, which kites, mice and spiders understand." Arnobius, book VI, p. 202: "Do you not see that on the face of the image spiders weave webs and treacherous nets?" etc. Minucius, ch. 24: "Spiders weave over its (the idol's) face, and hang their threads from its very head." Nevertheless, with Isaeus, Gallaeus, Sparke and Heumann I have preferred cariosis; for caries is attributed not only to wood, as Cellarius thought here, but to other things too. Hence Phaedrus, book V, fable X, line 5, wrote of a dog, "with rotten teeth." Indeed Arnobius, book VI, p. 202: the images (of the gods)... "loosen with ROT in the manner of decay"; and further Prudentius, Against Symmachus book I, lines 433–434: "I will not suffer you to venerate the monsters of rotten gods." But he who wishes to scent out the true reading here must needs have, as Plautus says, a keen nose. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 308)

(4) ‹anchor: Quid metuant› · col 590

Quid metuant. Mss. 10 recent. et 9 impressi, quid metuunt.

What they fear. 10 recent manuscripts and 9 printed, quid metuunt.

(printed under page 308)

(5) ‹anchor: De deorum cultoribus augeatur› · col 590

De deorum cultoribus augeatur. Deest de in 9 editis. Istud caput est conferendum cum Apologetico Tertulliani sub finem. Praepositionem de habent sex veteres editiones decimi quinti saeculi.

Is increased from the worshippers of the gods. De is missing in 9 editions. This chapter should be compared with the end of Tertullian's Apology. Six old editions of the fifteenth century have the preposition de.

(printed under page 308)

(6) ‹anchor: Nunquam vero› · col 590

Nunquam vero, etc. Fides christiana persecutione non modo non extinguitur, sed magis etiam magisque propagatur. Nam omnino sic divinitus comparatum est, ut ager ille Evangelicus piorum et innocentum cruore tanto magis pinguescat quanto largius funditur. Justus siquidem ut palma florebit. Vide Tertull. sub finem Apologet.

But never, etc. The Christian faith is not only not extinguished by persecution, but spreads more and more. For it is altogether so ordained by God that the field of the Gospel grows the richer with the blood of the devout and innocent the more freely it is shed. For the just shall flourish like the palm. See Tertullian at the end of the Apology.

(printed under page 308)

(7) ‹anchor: Tandem tam excors› · col 590

Tandem tam excors. Sic lego cum mss. 2 vetustissimis Reg. et 7 aliis. In 5 recent. pro tandem, legitur tamen; in 1 Bonon. antiq., 2 Lips., edit. Romana 1474, et aliis vulgatis, tam demens: quod quis non videt ex tandem factum esse? A 4 Reg. recent., 4 Colbert. et 8 veterib. editis utrumque abest. In uno Colbert. est vecors. — Quis est tandem excors, tamque caecus. Forte plenius ita legendum: Quis est tandem tam demens, tam excors tamque caecus? Cap. 12, infra, quis tandem erit tam demens? BUNEMAN.

At last so senseless. So I read with 2 very old Royal manuscripts and 7 others. In 5 recent, for tandem one reads tamen; in 1 old Bologna, 2 Leipzig, the Rome edition of 1474 and other common editions, tam demens: who does not see that this was made from tandem? From 4 recent Royal, 4 Colbert and 8 old editions both are absent. In one Colbert is vecors. — Who is, then, senseless and so blind. Perhaps it should be read more fully thus: "Who is, then, so mad, so senseless and so blind?" Ch. 12 below: "who then will be so mad?" BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 308)

(8) ‹anchor: Quum habeant in potestate, supplicia..... vitare› · col 590

Quum habeant in potestate, supplicia..... vitare. Reimm. et editi omnes: quum habeant in sua potestate supplicia vitare. Negare tamen non possum Lactantium in hac phrasi non solere pronomen addere. Cap. 10: Quos vivos habebat in potestate; cap. 18: Non habet in potestate, ut. Conf. de Ira, c. 21. Minucius tamen, c. 37: Quum dimitti haberent in sua potestate, addito pronomine; et Seneca, ep. 9: In sua potestate habet, quam cito reparet. Ut utrumque sit rectum. BUNEMAN.

Since they have it in their power to avoid... punishments. Reimmann and all the editions: quum habeant in sua potestate supplicia vitare. Yet I cannot deny that Lactantius is not wont to add the pronoun in this phrase. Ch. 10: "whom he had alive in his power"; ch. 18: "he does not have it in his power," etc. Compare On the Anger of God, ch. 21. Minucius, however, ch. 37: "since they had it in their own power to be released," with the pronoun added; and Seneca, letter 9: "He has it in his own power how quickly to replace it." So that both may be correct. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 308)

(9) ‹anchor: Desipit› · col 590

Desipit. Ita restitui ex mss. pene omnibus ac 7 veteribus editis, quod postulat verbum caret infra positum. Mss. 5 totidemque excusi habent desipuerit.

Is foolish. So I have restored from nearly all the manuscripts and 7 old editions, as the verb caret placed below requires. 5 manuscripts and as many printed have desipuerit.

(printed under page 308)

(10) ‹anchor: Utique innumerabiles› · col 590

Utique innumerabiles. Mss. Reg. Put., caeterae quoque; Francius, ut quae.

Certainly countless. The Regio-Puteanus manuscript, caeterae quoque; Franck, ut quae.

(printed under page 308)

(11) ‹anchor: Prudentia caret› · col 590

Prudentia caret. Ita quamplurimi mss. inter quos sunt tres antiquissimi 1 Reg., 1 Bonon., Cauc. In Regio-Put. aliisque 7 et in impressis legitur providentia.

Lacks wisdom. So very many manuscripts, among them three very old, 1 Royal, 1 Bologna, Cauc. In Regio-Puteanus and 7 others and in the printed editions one reads providentia.

(printed under page 308)

(12) ‹anchor: Unis ac paribus animis› · col 590

Unis ac paribus animis. Sic restitui ex 6 veteribus editis, et omnibus mss. praeter 1 Reg. recent., 1 Colb. a prima manu, et 12 editis, quibus est unitis. Sed et supra Lactantius legit, una et pari mente. Unis autem in plurali numero est vox Ciceroniana: unas, inquit (continues)

With one and equal minds. So I have restored from 6 old editions and all the manuscripts except 1 recent Royal, 1 Colbert in the first hand, and 12 editions, which have unitis. But above, too, Lactantius reads "with one and equal mind." Unis in the plural is a Ciceronian word: "unas," he says (continues)

(printed under page 308)

Page

  • running head: 589 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹quitur Plautus), suam vero prudentium prudentes :›; B ‹toribus augeatur, nunquam vero, ne in ipsa quidem›; C ‹rie relaxari. Hanc lectionem› (in the Variorum notae); D ‹bus et tineis, vel corroduntur› (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • misprints kept as printed: "prudentium" (line 1) for prudentiam; the English renders prudentiam (Q3a)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "quitur" of a word broken from the previous column (presumably lo-quitur); column ends with "tan-" hyphenated across the column break (presumably tan-dem); punctuation after "homines" is blurred, set as a comma, unsure; "minuatur" partly smudged but readable; "VARIORUM NOTAE" heading printed across both columns and cut off at the right edge is not set; the Variorum notae at the page foot (Plautus in Curcullione...) are not set here (later pass)
PL 6:590
tam excors tamque caecus, qui non videat in utra sit parte sapientia? Sed illi malitia et furore caecantur, ne videant; stultosque arbitrantur esse, qui cum habeant in sua potestate supplicia vitare, cruciari tamen et emori malunt; cum possint ex eo ipso pervidere non esse stultitiam, in quam tanta hominum millia per orbem totum una et pari mente consentiant. Si enim foeminae sexus infirmitate labuntur (nam interdum isti muliebrem aut anilem superstitionem vocant), viri certe sapiunt. Si pueri, si adolescentes improvidi sunt per aetatem, maturi certe ac senes habent stabile judicium. Si una civitas desipit, caeterae utique innumerabiles stultae esse non possunt. Si una provincia, una natio prudentia caret, caeteras omnes habere intelligentiam recti necesse est. Cum vero ab ortu solis usque ad occasum lex divina suscepta sit, et omnis sexus, omnis aetas et gens, et regio unis ac paribus animis Deo serviant, eadem sit ubique patientia, idem contemptus mortis; intelligere
so senseless and so blind that he does not see on which side wisdom lies? But they are blinded by malice and fury, so that they do not see; and they think those people fools who, though they have it in their power to avoid punishments, nevertheless prefer to be tortured and to die; whereas they could perceive from this very fact that it is not folly in which so many thousands of men throughout the whole world agree with one and the same mind. For if women slip through the weakness of their sex (for at times these men call it a womanish or old-wives' superstition), men at least are wise. If boys, if youths are improvident because of their age, the mature and the old at least have a steady judgement. If one city is foolish, the others, countless as they are, surely cannot be foolish. If one province, one nation lacks prudence, all the rest must have an understanding of what is right. But since the divine law has been received from the rising of the sun to its setting, and every sex, every age and race and region serves God with one and equal spirit, and there is everywhere the same patience, the same contempt of death, they ought to have understood
Editors' notes and page, col. 590

Page

  • running head: [LIBE]R V. DE JUSTITIA. 590 (left part of the head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹dem tam excors tamque caecus›; B ‹vero ab ortu solis usque›; C ‹non modo non extinguitur› (in the Variorum notes, not set); D ‹tantium in hac phrasi› (in the Variorum notes, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "dem", the end of "Tandem" broken from the previous column (the note "Tandem tam excors" confirms); stray mark over "homi-" in "hominum", read as hyphenated hominum; punctuation after "caret" is unclear (comma or semicolon), set as comma; full-width line "VARIORUM NOTAE" stands below the text block, cut off at the left edge, not set; the Variorum notes below (Sed sagax ... unas, inquit) are the editors' commentary at the page foot, left for the later pass
PL 6:591
debuerant aliquid in ea re esse rationis, quod non sine causa usque ad mortem defendatur; aliquid fundamenti ac soliditatis, quod eam religionem non tantum injuriis ac vexatione non solvat, sed augeat semper, et faciat firmiorem. Nam et in hoc quoque malitia illorum convincitur, qui evertisse se funditus religionem Dei opinantur, si homines inquinaverint; cnm et Deo satisfacere liceat, et nullus sit tam malus Dei cultor, quin data facultate, ad placandum Deum revertatur; et quidem devotione majori. Peccati enim conscientia et metus poenae religiosiorem facit; et semper multo firmior est fides quam reponit poenitentia.
that there is some reason in this matter, since it is defended not without cause even unto death; something of foundation and solidity, such that injuries and harassment not only do not dissolve that religion, but always increase it and make it firmer. For in this too the malice of those men is convicted, who suppose that they have utterly overthrown the religion of God if they have defiled men; since it is both permitted to make satisfaction to God, and there is no worshipper of God so bad that, given the opportunity, he does not return to appease God; and indeed with greater devotion. For the consciousness of sin and the fear of punishment make a man more religious; and the faith which repentance restores is always much firmer.
Si ergo ipsi, cum deos sibi arbitrantur iratos, tamen donis, et sacrificiis, et odoribus placari eos credunt: quid est tandem, cur Deum nostru⟨m⟩ tam immitem, tam implacabilem putent, ut videatu⟨r⟩ is jam c⟨h⟩ristianus esse non posse, qui diis eorum coactus invitusque libaverit? nisi forte contaminatos semel putant animum translaturos, ut sua sponte jam facere
If therefore they themselves, when they think the gods angry with them, nevertheless believe that they are appeased by gifts, and sacrifices, and odours: why then is it that they think our God so harsh, so implacable, that he seems no longer able to be a Christian who, compelled and unwilling, has poured a libation to their gods? Unless perhaps they think that those once defiled will turn their mind, so that of their own accord they now
Editors' notes and page, col. 591

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 309)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page)› · col 591

(continued) in pluribus epistolis, a te accepi litteras. Item apud Arnobium, lib. VII adversus Gentes, cum deorum sint sententiae dispares substantiaeque non unae. Haec ad grammaticos.

(printed under page 309)

(2) ‹anchor: Quin data facultate, ad placandum Deum revertatur› · col 591

Quin data facultate, ad placandum Deum revertatur. Sic restitui ex omnibus prope mss. et 5 vet. excusis. In 1 Reg. rec. et 9 editis rec. qui... non. Mss. Cauc. et 1 Lips., ad placidum Deum.

But that, given the opportunity, he should return to appease God. So I have restored from nearly all the manuscripts and 5 old printed editions. In 1 recent Royal and 9 recent editions, qui... non. The Cauc. and 1 Leipzig manuscripts, ad placidum Deum (to the gracious God).

(printed under page 309)

(3) ‹anchor: Devotione majori› · col 591

Devotione majori. Fit aliquando ut lapsi, qui ad saniorem vitam revertuntur majori devotione, quam antea Deum diligant; non vero majori semper devotione, quam ii qui nusquam lapsi sunt. Nec igitur poenitentium fides firmior est quam fides eorum qui eam religiose servaverunt. In hanc ergo Lactantii opinionem recte animadvertet theologus quisque catholicus.

With greater devotion. It sometimes happens that the lapsed who return to a sounder life love God with greater devotion than before; but not always with greater devotion than those who never lapsed. Nor, then, is the faith of penitents firmer than the faith of those who have kept it devoutly. Every Catholic theologian will rightly take exception to this opinion of Lactantius.

(printed under page 309)

(4) ‹anchor: Multo firmior› · col 591

Multo firmior... Catholice contra Donatistas, poenitentiam lapsis denegantes.

Much firmer... Said in the Catholic sense, against the Donatists, who denied penance to the lapsed.

(printed under page 309)

(5) ‹anchor: Quid est tandem, cur› · col 591

Quid est tandem, cur. Ita scribo cum mss. 2 Bonon. septemque aliis ac edit. Rom. 1474, et Cellar. Mss. 7 Reg., inter quos sunt duo antiquissimi, et 1 Colb. habent, tamen cur; inepte, cum mox tamen praecesserit. 3 Colbert., 1 Clarom. et 14 impressi, quid est tandem quod. — Lib. I, c. 17: Erat plane, cur. Ibid., c. 18: Est vero, cur. Conf. lib. II, cap. 6; l. III, cap. 17; Heins. ad Ovid., Metam. II, v. 518: Est vero, cur. Propius vero nostro loco, l. II, c. 8: Quid est, cur; l. VI, c. 11: Quid causae est, cur; ibid., c. 9: Quid tandem habet, cur. Denique plane ut hic de Opif., c. 1: Quid est tandem, cur nobis invidiosum putet. BUNEMAN.

What is it, then, why. So I write with 2 Bologna manuscripts and seven others, and the Rome edition of 1474, and Cellarius. 7 Royal manuscripts, among them two very old, and 1 Colbert have tamen cur; clumsily, since tamen has just preceded. 3 Colbert, 1 Clermont and 14 printed, quid est tandem quod. — Book I, ch. 17: "There was plainly reason why." Ibid., ch. 18: "There is indeed reason why." Compare book II, ch. 6; book III, ch. 17; Heinsius on Ovid, Metamorphoses II, line 518: "There is indeed reason why." Nearer to our passage, book II, ch. 8: "What is it, why"; book VI, ch. 11: "What cause is there, why"; ibid., ch. 9: "What, then, has he, why." Finally, exactly as here, On the Workmanship of God, ch. 1: "What is it, then, why he should think it invidious to us." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 309)

(6) ‹anchor: Libaverit› · col 591

Libaverit. Mss. 2 Reg., 1 Clarom., Bun., libarit. Francius, forte LITAVERIT.

Has made libation. 2 Royal manuscripts, 1 Clermont, Bünemann, libarit. Franck, perhaps LITAVERIT (has sacrificed acceptably).

(printed under page 309)

(7) ‹anchor: Nisi forte contaminatos semel putant animum translaturos› · col 591

Nisi forte contaminatos semel putant animum translaturos. Legitur vero apud Buneman.: Nisi forte contaminatos semel animos ita putant posse transferri; et ille in hanc lectionem notam sequentem exhibet. — Ita scribo ex Lips. 2, 3, Reimm., ubi Torn. 1587, 1613 et Gen. 1630, quam Walch. expressit: Nisi si forte contaminatos semel animos ita putant posse transferri; altera 1478: Nisi forte contaminatos semel puteut animos translaturos. At Rost., Ven. 1493, 97, Parrh., Paris., Junt., Fasit., Gryph., Thomas., Isaeus, Thys., Gall., Spark., Cantab., Cell.: contaminatos semel putant animum translaturos. At rectius in plurali Ald. Crat., Gymn., Torn. 1548, et Betuleius: Contaminatos semel putant animos translaturos. Ita noster, lib. IV, cap. 10: Judaei ad profanos Aegyptioum ritus animos transtulerunt. Ipsa phrasis, transferre animum, (continues on col 592) est elegans. Cicero, l. III Fam., ep. 13 fin.: Me... ab angoribus abducam, transferamque animum ad ea. BUNEMAN.

Unless perhaps they think that those once defiled will turn their mind. In Bünemann, however, one reads: "Unless perhaps they think that minds once defiled can thus be transferred"; and he gives the following note on this reading. — So I write from Leipzig 2, 3, Reimmann, where Tornaesius 1587, 1613 and Geneva 1630, which Walch reproduced: "Unless perhaps they think that minds once defiled can thus be transferred"; the other of 1478: "Unless perhaps they think (puteut, for putent) those once defiled will turn their minds." But Rostock, Venice 1493, 97, Parrhasius, Paris, Junta, Fasitelius, Gryphius, Thomasius, Isaeus, Thysius, Gallaeus, Sparke, Cambridge, Cellarius: "those once defiled, they think, will turn their mind." More correctly, in the plural, Aldus, Cratander, Gymnicus, Tornaesius 1548 and Betuleius: "they think those once defiled will turn their minds." So our author, book IV, ch. 10: the Jews "turned their minds to the profane rites of the Egyptians." The phrase itself, transferre animum, is elegant. Cicero, Letters to Friends book III, letter 13 end: "I will draw myself away from my anxieties and turn my mind to those things." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 309)

(8) ‹anchor: Obeat› · col 592

Obeat. Scripti 6 et edit. 5, subeat; Cauc., abeat.

Should meet. 6 manuscripts and 5 editions, subeat; Cauc., abeat.

(printed under page 309)

(9) ‹anchor: Aeterna poenarum insignia› · col 592

Aeterna poenarum insignia. Ita omnes edd. et mss. praeter Goth., 3 Lips. et 3 ed. in quibus est externa. Versio Gallica, les enseignes perpétuelles. Aeterna, id est, perpetua.

The everlasting marks of the punishments. So all the editions and manuscripts except Gotha, 3 Leipzig and 3 editions, in which is externa (outward). The French version, les enseignes perpétuelles. Aeterna, that is, perpetual.

(printed under page 309)

(10) ‹anchor: Pace› · col 592

Pace. Id est, restituta tranquillitate Ecclesiae, ut c. 21: Quandiu pax est in populo Dei. Conf. de Mort. persec., c. 1, c. 3, c. 52. BUNEMAN.

In peace. That is, when the calm of the Church has been restored, as in ch. 21: "As long as there is peace among the people of God." Compare On the Deaths of the Persecutors, chs. 1, 3, 52. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 309)

(11) ‹anchor: Et qui fuerint aversi, redeant› · col 592

Et qui fuerint aversi, redeant. Sic emendavi ex mss. 1 Colbert., 2 Brun. et edit. Tornes., Soubron. et Betul. Recte, ut opinor: siquidem Lactantius supra dixit, averti a Deo; et infra, cap. 20, si animus sacrificantis aversus est. Caeteri mss. et impressi legunt universi.

And those who have turned away, let them return. So I have corrected from 1 Colbert and 2 Brun. manuscripts and the editions of Tornaesius, Soubron and Betuleius. Rightly, I think: for Lactantius said above "to be turned away from God," and below, ch. 20, "if the mind of the one sacrificing is turned away." The other manuscripts and printed editions read universi (all).

(printed under page 309)

(12) ‹anchor: Novus populus› · col 592

Novus populus. Cyprian. Exhort. Mart. XI: Quod si tantus ostenditur et probatur Christianorum martyrum populus, nemo difficile vel arduum putet esse martyrem fieri, quando videt martyrum populum non posse numerari. BUNEMAN.

A new people. Cyprian, Exhortation to Martyrdom XI: "But if so great a people of Christian martyrs is shown and proved, let no one think it hard or arduous to become a martyr, when he sees that the people of the martyrs cannot be numbered." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 309)

(13) ‹anchor: Quam videat vulgus› · col 592

Quam videat vulgus. Tertull., l. I ad Nationes, c. 1 et ad Scapulam extr.: Nec tamen deficiet haec secta, quam tunc magis aedificari scias, quum caedi videtur; quisque enim tantam tolerantiam spectans, ut aliquo scrupulo percussus et inquirere accenditur, quid sit in causa, et ubi cognoverit veritatem, et ipse statim sequitur. Huc pertinent ex Lact. lib. V, cap. 22. BUNEMAN.

Which the crowd sees. Tertullian, To the Nations book I, ch. 1, and To Scapula at the end: "Yet this sect will not fail; know that it is built up the more when it seems to be cut down; for everyone who watches such great endurance, struck as it were by some misgiving, is fired to inquire what lies behind it, and when he has learned the truth, he himself at once follows." To this belongs Lactantius, book V, ch. 22. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 309)

(14) ‹anchor: Variis tormentorum generibus› · col 592

Variis tormentorum generibus. Vide l. de Mort. Pers., c. 18. Ea describunt Sagittarius et Gallonius de Cruciatibus martyrum; et sparsim Kortholt. in aureo libro de Persecutionibus Ecclesiae primaevae. BUNEMAN.

By various kinds of torture. See On the Deaths of the Persecutors, ch. 18. Sagittarius and Gallonius describe them in "On the Torments of the Martyrs"; and Kortholt here and there in his golden book On the Persecutions of the Primitive Church. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 309)

(15) ‹anchor: Posse› · col 592

Posse. Mss. 1 Bon. addit sponte sua.

To be able. 1 Bologna manuscript adds sponte sua (of its own accord).

(printed under page 309)

(16) ‹anchor: Inspirata patientia› · col 592

Inspirata patientia. Mss. 8 rec. inspiratio patientiae; 1 Clarom. desperatio patientiae, corrupte, 1 Colb. inspiratio sapientiae, mendose, pro patientiae. Legitur quoque apud Arnobium, lib. VII.

Inspired patience. 8 recent manuscripts, inspiratio patientiae; 1 Clermont, desperatio patientiae, corruptly; 1 Colbert, inspiratio sapientiae, faultily, for patientiae. It is read also in Arnobius, book VII.

(printed under page 309)

(17) ‹anchor: Et mulierculae› · col 592

Et mulierculae. Haec et sequentia desumpta sunt ex Minucio Felice. Vide Clementem Alexandrin. Stromat. lib. IV. Vide Arnob., lib. VII et Acta vera et sincera martyrum.

And little women. This and what follows are taken from Minucius Felix. See Clement of Alexandria, Stromata book IV. See Arnobius, book VII, and the True and Genuine Acts of the Martyrs.

(printed under page 309)

(18) ‹anchor: Eant Romani› · col 592

Eant Romani, etc. Male tamen hic interpretatur Lactantius duo patientiae ac fortitudinis Romanae exempla. Regulus ad Carthaginenses etiam cum tormentorum ac vitae periculo rediit, ut fidem datam servaret, maluitque patientia cruciatus superare, quam sibi mortem consciscere. Mutius vero non minorem testatus est patientiam ac fortitudinem in supplicio (continues)

Let the Romans go, etc. Yet Lactantius here misinterprets two examples of Roman patience and courage. Regulus returned to the Carthaginians even at the risk of torture and of life, to keep the faith he had given, and chose to overcome his torments by patience rather than take his own life. Mucius indeed showed no less patience and courage in the punishment (continues)

(printed under page 309)

Page

  • running head: 591 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN[...] (cut off at right edge of image)
  • marginal letters: A debuerant aliquid in ea re esse rationis; B dunt : quid est tandem, cur Deum; C niorem vitam revertuntur (in the Variorum Notae); D habet, cur. Denique plane ut hic (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • misprints kept as printed: "cnm" (line 8) for cum, in the text (Q3a); in the Variorum notae, note 7: "puteut" for putent and "Aegyptioum" for Aegyptiorum (Q3a)
  • other: "non" in "non tantum" (line 3) printed with damaged type so it looks like "uou", set as non; "nostrura" read as nostrum with a broken final m; "videatu?" read as videatur with damaged final r; "cnristianus" taken as an h with its ascender lost (set c⟨h⟩ristianus), though it could be an n misprint. The column ends mid-sentence at "facere"; the next column begins "incipiant". The full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" and the editors' notes below it ("in pluribus epistolis, a te accepi litteras ...") are page-foot apparatus and are not set here (later pass).
PL 6:592
incipiant quod per tormenta fecerunt. Quis id officium libens obeat, quod ab injuria coepit? Quis cum videat laterum suorum cicatrices, non magis oderit deos, propter quos aeterna poenarum insignia, et impressas visceribus suis notas gestet? Ita fit ut, data divinitus pace, et qui fuerint aversi, redeant, et alius propter miraculum virtutis novus populus accedat. Nam cum videat vulgus dilacerari homines variis tormentorum generibus, et inter fatigatos carnifices invictam tenere patientiam, existimant, id quod res est, nec consensum tam multorum, nec perseverantiam morientium vanam esse, nec ipsam patientiam sine Deo cruciatus tantos posse superare. Latrones et robusti corporis viri ejusmodi lacerationes perferre nequeunt: exclamant, et gemitus edunt; vincuntur enim dolore, quia deest illis inspirata patientia. Nostri autem (ut de viris taceam) pueri, et mulierculae, tortores suos taciti vincunt; et exprimere illis gemitum nec ignis potest. Eant Romani, et Mutio glorientur, aut Regulo: quorum alter necandum
begin to do what they did through tortures. Who would willingly perform that service which began from injury? Who, when he sees the scars on his own sides, would not hate the gods all the more, on whose account he bears everlasting badges of punishment and marks branded into his flesh? Thus it comes about that, when peace has been granted from heaven, both those who had been turned away return, and another new people is added on account of the marvel of their virtue. For when the common people see men torn apart by various kinds of tortures, and holding fast an unconquered patience amid exhausted executioners, they judge, as is indeed the case, that neither the agreement of so many nor the perseverance of the dying is vain, and that patience itself could not overcome such great tortures without God. Robbers and men of robust body cannot endure lacerations of this kind: they cry out and utter groans; for they are overcome by pain, because inspired patience is lacking to them. But our boys and weak women (to say nothing of men) conquer their torturers in silence; and not even fire can wring a groan from them. Let the Romans go and boast of Mucius, or of Regulus: of whom the one, to be put to death
Editors' notes and page, col. 592

Page

  • running head: [LA]CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 592 (left edge of head cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A incipiant quod per tormenta; B vincuntur enim dolore; C beside the notes, at "21 : Quandiu pax"; D beside the notes, at "Variis tormentorum generibus"
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width heading "[VA]RIORUM NOTAE" below the text block not set; the Variorum notes beneath it (Buneman etc.) are page-foot apparatus, left for the later pass; column begins mid-sentence with "incipiant" and ends mid-sentence with "necandum"; the existimant (plural with singular vulgus) is set as printed
PL 6:593
se hostibus tradidit, quod captivum puduit vivere; alter ab hostibus deprehensus, cum videret se mortem vitare non posse, manum foco injecit, ut pro facinore suo satisfaceret hosti, quem voluit occidere, eaque poena veniam, quam non meruerat, accepit. Ecce sexus infirmus, et fragilis aetas dilace⟨r⟩ari se toto corpore urique perpetitur, non necessitate, quia licet vitare, si vellent, sed vol⟨u⟩ntate, quia confidunt Deo.
gave himself up to the enemy, because he was ashamed to live as a captive; the other, caught by the enemy, when he saw that he could not escape death, thrust his hand into the fire, so that for his deed he might give satisfaction to the enemy whom he had wished to kill, and by that punishment he received the pardon which he had not deserved. Behold, the weak sex and frail age endure to be torn apart and burned in the whole body, not of necessity, since they may avoid it if they wished, but of their own will, because they trust in God.
CAPUT XIV.
Chapter XIV.
De Christianorum fortitudine.
On the fortitude of Christians.
Sed haec est vera virtus, quam philosophi quoque gloriabundi, non re, sed verbis inanibus jactant, disserentes nihil esse tam congruens viri sapientis gravitati atque constantiae, quam nullis tortoribus de sententia et proposito posse depelli; sed tanti esse cruciari et mori, ne fidem prodat, ne ab officio discedat, ne metu mortis aut dolore acerbo subactus, aliquid faciat injustum. Nisi forte delirare illis videtur Flaccus in Lyricis, cum dicit:
But this is the true virtue, which the philosophers too, vaunting themselves, boast of, not in deed but in empty words, arguing that nothing is so befitting the gravity and constancy of a wise man as that he cannot be driven by any torturers from his opinion and purpose; but that it is worth so much to be tortured and to die, so that he may not betray his faith, may not depart from his duty, may not, subdued by fear of death or by bitter pain, do anything unjust. Unless perhaps Flaccus seems to them to be raving in his Lyrics, when he says:
Justum, et tenacem propositi virum, / Non civium ardor prava jubentium, / Non vultus instantis tyranni / Mente quatit solida.
The man who is just and tenacious of his purpose, neither the ardour of citizens bidding wrong things, nor the countenance of a threatening tyrant shakes in his solid mind.
Quo nihil verius dici potest, si hoc ad eos referatur,
Than which nothing truer can be said, if this is referred to those
Editors' notes and page, col. 593

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 310)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page)› · col 593

(continued) libens suscipiendo, ob Porsennam a se per errorem non trucidatum. De his vide S. August. de Civit. Dei, lib. I, cap. 15 et 24, et lib. IV, cap. 20. — Eant Romani... glorientur. Imitatur Cypr., l. II, ep. 4, ed. Erasm., ed. Oxon. ep. 37, p. 73: Eant nunc magistratus, et consules sive proconsules annuae dignitatis insignibus et duodecim fascibus glorientur: Ecce. BUNEMAN.

(printed under page 310)

(2) ‹anchor: Accepit› · col 593

Accepit. Heumann. legit acciperet. — Accepit. Clare et hic sequitur Minucium, c. 37 seqq.: Vos ipsi calamitosos viros fertis ad coelum, Mutium Scaevolam, qui quum errasset in regem, periisset in hostibus, nisi dexteram perdidisset. BUNEMAN.

He received. Heumann reads acciperet. — He received. Here too he clearly follows Minucius, ch. 37 and following: "You yourselves exalt to heaven men of misfortune: Mucius Scaevola, who, when he had missed the king, would have perished among the enemy had he not lost his right hand." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 310)

(3) ‹anchor: Sexus infirmus› · col 593

Sexus infirmus. Haec est lectio mss. antiquorum et 9 editorum. Scripti rec. 10 et excusi 6 pro infirmus, habent foemineus, quod mihi glossema sapere videtur. — Sexus infirmus. Sic Cyprianus, epist. 4, ed. Oxon. f. 8: Nec pati virgines cum masculis habitare... quando et sexus infirmus, et aetas adhuc lubrica per omnia... regi debeat. BUNEMAN.

The weak sex. This is the reading of the old manuscripts and 9 editions. 10 recent manuscripts and 6 printed have foemineus (female) for infirmus, which seems to me to smack of a gloss. — The weak sex. So Cyprian, letter 4, Oxford edition, f. 8: "Nor to suffer virgins to live with men... since both the weak sex and an age still slippery ought to be governed in everything..." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 310)

(4) ‹anchor: Urique› · col 593

Urique. Edit. Aldi utique: at male; ignis enim adhibebatur in cruciatibus, ut videre est supra. — Urique. Etiam hic Minucium exprimit, c. 37: Et quot ex nostris non dexteram solum, sed totum corpus uri, cremari sine ullis ejulatibus pertulerunt, quum dimitti praesertim haberent in sua potestate? Conf. Lact. de Mort. pers., cap. 16, cap. 21, cap. 22, epist. cap. 66. BUNEMAN.

And to be burned. Aldus's edition, utique (at any rate): but wrongly; for fire was used in the tortures, as can be seen above. — And to be burned. Here too he reproduces Minucius, ch. 37: "And how many of ours have borne not their right hand only but their whole body to be burned and consumed without any wailing, especially when they had it in their own power to be released?" Compare Lactantius, On the Deaths of the Persecutors, chs. 16, 21, 22; Epitome, ch. 66. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 310)

(5) ‹anchor: Deo› · col 593

Deo. Mss. 12 et edd. 8, in Deo.

To God. 12 manuscripts and 8 editions, in Deo.

(printed under page 310)

(6) ‹anchor: Sed› · col 593

Sed. Addidi ex Editt. Coloniensi anni 1544 et Betuleii 1563.

But. I have added it from the Cologne edition of 1544 and Betuleius's of 1563.

(printed under page 310)

(7) ‹anchor: Philosophi quoque gloriabundi› · col 593

Philosophi quoque gloriabundi. Tertull. Apolog., c. 50: Multi apud vos ad tolerantiam doloris et mortis hortantur, ut Cicero in Tusculanis, ut Seneca in Fortuitis, ut Diogenes, ut Pyrrhon, ut Callinicus: Nec tamen tantos inveniunt verba discipulos, quantos Christiani factis docendo. BUN.

The philosophers too, boastful. Tertullian, Apology, ch. 50: "Many among you urge to the endurance of pain and death," as Cicero in the Tusculans, as Seneca in On Chance Events, as Diogenes, as Pyrrho, as Callinicus: "Yet their words do not find as many disciples as the Christians find by teaching with deeds." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 310)

(8) ‹anchor: Nullis tortoribus› · col 593

Nullis tortoribus. Ita correxi ex 7 mss. Reg. antiquioribus et Em. Alii ferunt terroribus. Vide supra, nostri autem (ut de viris taceam) pueri, et mulierculae tortores suos taciti vincunt; et Epitom., cap. 54, si superatis tortoribus animum pro fide ac religione ponamus. Scripti 14 et 8 impressi, de sententia et proposito; 5 rec. manu exarati et 8 vulgati, de sententiae proposito.

By no torturers. So I have corrected from 7 older Royal manuscripts and Em. Others bear terroribus (terrors). See above, "but our children (to say nothing of the men) and our little women silently overcome their torturers"; and Epitome, ch. 54, "if, the torturers overcome, we lay down our life for faith and religion." 14 manuscripts and 8 printed, de sententia et proposito; 5 recent handwritten and 8 common editions, de sententiae proposito.

(printed under page 310)

(9) ‹anchor: Et mori› · col 594

Et mori. Mss. 5 et ed. 4, et emori. — Bon., Tax., Pen., Lips. alter., Reimm., Rost., Ven. utraque 78, 1515, Paris, Crat., Gymn., Isaeus, cruciari et mori. Pal., Jun., Goth., Lips. 1, 3 Fasit., Gryph., Torn., Thomas., cruciari et emori. Vid., cap. 13, not. BUN.

And to die. 5 manuscripts and 4 editions, et emori. — Bologna, Tax., Pen., the other Leipzig, Reimmann, Rostock, both Venice of 78, 1515, Paris, Cratander, Gymnicus, Isaeus, cruciari et mori. Palatine, Junta, Gotha, Leipzig 1, 3, Fasitelius, Gryphius, Tornaesius, Thomasius, cruciari et emori. See ch. 13, note. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 310)

(10) ‹anchor: Subactus› · col 594

Subactus. Em. coactus.

Subdued. Em., coactus (compelled).

(printed under page 310)

(11) ‹anchor: Flaccus› · col 594

Flaccus. Horat. l. III carm., Od. 3.

Flaccus. Horace, Odes book III, ode 3.

(printed under page 310)

(12) ‹anchor: Praesidum› · col 594

Praesidum. Qui provincias regebant.

Of the governors. Those who ruled the provinces.

(printed under page 310)

(13) ‹anchor: Solo› · col 594

Solo. 1 Colbert. Seculo.

Ground. 1 Colbert, Seculo (age).

(printed under page 310)

(14) ‹anchor: Vel colendi, quod nolim... colendi› · col 594

Vel colendi, quod nolim... colendi. Sequitur Tertull. Apolog., c. 23: Videte, ne et hoc ad irreligiositatis elogium concurrat, adimere libertatem religionis, et interdicere optionem divinitatis, ut non liceat mihi colere, quem velim, sed cogar colere quem nolim. Conf. Lact. Epit., c. 53 et c. 54: Nec imponi cuiquam necessitas potest, ut colat, quod non vult. BUN.

Or of worshipping what I would not... of worshipping. He follows Tertullian, Apology, ch. 23: "See that this too does not count towards the charge of irreligion: to take away freedom of religion and forbid choice of deity, so that I may not worship whom I will but am forced to worship whom I will not." Compare Lactantius, Epitome, chs. 53 and 54: "Nor can necessity be laid on anyone to worship what he does not wish." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 310)

(15) ‹anchor: Relinquetur› · col 594

Relinquetur. Mss. Regio-Put., 1 Colbert. et Brun., relinquatur; 1 Reg. rec. relinquitur.

Will be left. The Regio-Puteanus, 1 Colbert and Brun. manuscripts, relinquatur; 1 recent Royal, relinquitur.

(printed under page 310)

(16) ‹anchor: Extorquet› · col 594

Extorquet. Ms. 1 Reg. antiquiss. et edit. Ald. 1515, Graph., Crat., extorqueat.

Wrests. 1 very old Royal manuscript and the editions of Aldus 1515, Gryphius, Cratander, extorqueat.

(printed under page 310)

(17) ‹anchor: Seneca› · col 594

Seneca. Hic locus est inter fragmenta, quae sunt initio operum Senecae. Scilicet in Fortuitis. Sic legitur apud Tertullianum in epilogo Apologetici: Multi apud vos ad tolerantiam doloris et mortis hortantur, ut Cicero in Tusculanis, ut Seneca in Fortuitis, ut Diogenes, ut Pyrrhon, ut Callinicus.

Seneca. This passage is among the fragments at the beginning of Seneca's works: namely in On Chance Events. So one reads in Tertullian in the epilogue of the Apology: "Many among you urge to the endurance of pain and death, as Cicero in the Tusculans, as Seneca in On Chance Events, as Diogenes, as Pyrrho, as Callinicus."

(printed under page 310)

(18) ‹anchor: Virtus› · col 594

Virtus. 1 Brun. justitia.

Virtue. 1 Brun., justitia (justice).

(printed under page 310)

(19) ‹anchor: Summae perversitatis› · col 594

Summae perversitatis. 1 Reg. summum perversitatis; 1 Bonon. antiq. Summae pravitatis.

Of the utmost perversity. 1 Royal, summum perversitatis; 1 old Bologna, Summae pravitatis.

(printed under page 310)

(20) ‹anchor: Sibylla› · col 594

Sibylla. Vide Serm. 8, et apud Theophil. ad Autolyc., lib II.

The Sibyl. See Discourse 8, and in Theophilus, To Autolycus, book II.

(printed under page 310)

(21) ‹anchor: Terram digitis suis imaginatam› · col 594

Terram digitis suis imaginatam. Id est, in imaginem figuratam, atque formatam digitis suis. Sic S. Remigius in suo testamento apud Brisson. formul., lib. VII: Tibi haeredi meae ecclesiae supra memoratae jubeo thuribulum et imaginatum calicem fabricari. ISAEUS. — Lactantius verbum imaginor passive posuit quod activum semper est. — Elegantius dixit de Ira, c. 20. Adorant opera humanis digitis laborata... de terra ficta et formata venerantur. BUN.

Earth shaped by their fingers into images. That is, figured into an image and formed by their fingers. So St Remigius in his testament, in Brisson's Formulae, book VII: "For you, my heir, the church named above, I order a censer and an imaged chalice to be made." ISAEUS. — Lactantius has used the verb imaginor in the passive, which is always active. — He said it more elegantly in On the Anger of God, ch. 20: "They adore works wrought by human fingers... they venerate things moulded and formed of earth." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 310)

Page

  • running head: 593 LIBER V. DE JUST (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A se hostibus tradidit; B cruciari et mori, ne fidem prodat; C ed. Oxon. ep. 37 (in the notes); D ex nostris non dexteram solum (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: puduit: the second u is blurred and reads like o in the scan, so it is set as puduit (UNSURE). dilace⟨r⟩ari: the r is damaged type. vol⟨u⟩ntate: the u is damaged type. The verse quotation (Horace, Odes 3.3.1-4) is set as one paragraph with its lines divided by /. The full-width heading VARIORUM NOT[AE] stands below the text block, after "referatur,"; it is not set. Buneman's notes below it are left for the later pass.
PL 6:594
qui nullos cruciatus, nullam mortem recusant, ne a fide justitiaque declinent; qui non tyrannicas jussiones, non praesidum gladios tremunt, quominus veram et solidam libertatem constanti mente defendant; quae in hoc solo tuenda sapientia est. Quis enim tam insolens, tam elatus est, qui me vetet oculos in coelum tollere? Quis imponat mihi necessitatem, vel colendi quod nolim, vel quod velim non colendi? Quid jam nobis ulterius relinquetur, si etiam hoc, quod voluntate fieri oportet, libido extorquet aliena? nemo istud efficiet, si quid nobis ad contemnendam mortem doloremque virtutis est. Quam constan⟨t⟩iam si tenemus, cur stulti judicamur, facientes ea quae philosophi laudant? Recte igitur Seneca incongruentiam hominibus objectans, ait: Summa virtus illis videtur magnus animus. Et iidem eum, qui contemnit mortem, pro furioso habent, quod est utique summae perversitatis. Sed ii vanarum religionum cultores eadem stultitia id objiciunt, qua verum Deum non intelligunt; quos Sibylla Erithraea κωφοὺς καὶ ἀνοήτους vocat, surdos scilicet, et excordes, qui nec audiant divina, nec sentiant: sed terram digitis suis imaginatam metuant, et adorent.
who refuse no tortures, no death, so as not to turn aside from faith and justice; who do not tremble at the commands of tyrants or the swords of governors so as to fail to defend true and solid liberty with a steadfast mind; which it is wisdom to defend in this matter alone. For who is so insolent, so arrogant, as to forbid me to raise my eyes to heaven? Who can impose on me the necessity either of worshipping what I do not wish, or of not worshipping what I wish? What will be left to us any longer, if even this, which ought to be done by the will, the lust of another wrests from us? No one will accomplish that, if we have any virtue for despising death and pain. If we hold to this constancy, why are we judged foolish when we do the things which the philosophers praise? Rightly, therefore, does Seneca, reproaching men with inconsistency, say: The highest virtue seems to them to be greatness of mind. And these same men regard one who despises death as a madman, which is surely the height of perversity. But these worshippers of vain religions raise this objection with the same folly with which they fail to understand the true God; whom the Erithraean Sibyl calls κωφοὺς καὶ ἀνοήτους, that is to say, deaf and senseless, who neither hear divine things nor perceive them, but fear and adore earth shaped by their own fingers.
Editors' notes and page, col. 594

Page

  • running head: ER V. DE JUSTITIA. (cut off at left edge; presumably ...LIBER V. DE JUSTITIA.)
  • marginal letters: A qui nullos cruciatus; B videtur magnus animus; C Pen., Lips. alter. (in the Variorum notes); D Seneca. Hic locus est (in the Variorum notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: constan⟨t⟩iam: the t is damaged/broken in the type; Erithraea kept as printed (usual spelling Erythraea); full-width heading "...ARIORUM NOTÆ" (Variorum Notae) stands between the text and the notes, cut off at the left edge, not set; left-edge fragments belong to column 593; Variorum notes not set (later pass)
PL 6:595
CAPUT XV.
Chapter XV.
De stultitia, sapientia, pietate, aequitate et justitia.
On folly, wisdom, piety, equity and justice.
Quae vero causa sit, ut eos qui sapientes sunt, stultos putent, magna ratio est (nec enim frustra falluntur). Quae nobis diligenter est explicanda, ut errores suos tandem (si fieri possit) agnoscant. Justitia suapte natura speciem quamdam stultitiae habet, quod ego et divinis, et humanis testimoniis confirmare possum. Sed nihil fortasse apud istos agamus, nisi eos de suis doceamus auctoribus, non posse quemquam justum esse, quod est conjunctum cum vera sapientia, nisi idem stultus esse videatur. Carneades, Academicae sectae philosophus, cujus in disserendo quae vis fuerit, quae eloquentia, quod acumen, qui nescit, ipsum ex praedicatione Ciceronis intelliget, aut Lucilii, apud quem disserens Neptunus de re difficillima, ostendit non posse id explicari, nec si Carneadem ipsum Orcus remittat. Is, cum legatus ab Atheniensibus Romam missus esset, disputavit de justitia copiose, audiente Galba, et Catone censorio, maximis tunc oratoribus. Sed idem disputationem suam postridie contraria disputatione subvertit; et justitiam, quam pridie laudaverat, sustulit, non quidem philosophi
But what the cause is that they think those who are wise to be fools, there is a great reason (for they are not deceived without cause). This must be carefully explained by us, so that they may at last (if it can be done) recognize their errors. Justice by its own nature has a certain appearance of folly, which I can confirm by both divine and human testimonies. But perhaps we should achieve nothing among these men unless we teach them from their own authors that no one can be just, which is joined with true wisdom, unless the same man seems to be a fool. Carneades, a philosopher of the Academic school, whoever does not know what force he had in disputing, what eloquence, what acuteness, will understand it from the praise of Cicero, or of Lucilius, in whom Neptune, discoursing on a most difficult matter, shows that it cannot be explained, not even if Orcus should send back Carneades himself. He, when he had been sent to Rome as an envoy by the Athenians, discoursed at length on justice, in the hearing of Galba and Cato the censor, the greatest orators of that time. But the same man on the following day overturned his own disputation by a contrary disputation; and justice, which he had praised the day before, he took away, not indeed with a philosopher's
Editors' notes and page, col. 595

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 311)

(1) ‹anchor: Quae... causa sit... putent? Magna ratio est› · col 595

Quae... causa sit... putent? Magna ratio est. Posui interrogandi signum post putent, ut quasi respondeat: Magna ratio est, quae nobis, etc. BUN.

What... cause is there... that they should think? There is a great reason. I have put a question mark after putent, so that he answers, as it were: "There is a great reason," which to us, etc. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 311)

(2) ‹anchor: Possit› · col 595

Possit. Scripti 11 rec. et edit. 5, potest.

Could. 11 recent manuscripts and 5 editions, potest.

(printed under page 311)

(3) ‹anchor: Agamus› · col 595

Agamus. Mss. 9 rec. et editi, agemus.

Let us treat. 9 recent manuscripts and the editions, agemus.

(printed under page 311)

(4) ‹anchor: Ipsum ex praedicatione Ciceronis intelliget› · col 595

Ipsum ex praedicatione Ciceronis intelliget. Mss. 2 Bonon., Tax., Pen., ferunt, is ipsum; Cantabr. et edd. 15, is, neglecto ipsum; 2 Reg. rec. et edd. II vet. Rom. neutrum habent. Haec Ciceronis erant in tertio de Republica libro. — Heum. legit, intelligat.

He will understand it from Cicero's praise. 2 Bologna manuscripts, Tax., Pen., bear is ipsum; Cambridge and 15 editions, is, with ipsum omitted; 2 recent Royal and the 2 old Rome editions have neither. These words of Cicero were in the third book of the Republic. — Heumann reads intelligat.

(printed under page 311)

(5) ‹anchor: Nec si Carneadem› · col 595

Nec si Carneadem, etc. Antonomasia proverbialis, pro, hic si ab inferis resurgat. Hujus eloquentia celebratur a pluribus. De cujus studio et industria lege in primis Valer. Max. Fuit is novae Academiae princeps, ut ait Lucianus. BETULEIUS.

Not even if Carneades, etc. A proverbial antonomasia, for: even if he rose from the dead. His eloquence is celebrated by many. On his zeal and industry read above all Valerius Maximus. He was the head of the New Academy, as Lucian says. BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 311)

(6) ‹anchor: Is, cum legatus› · col 595

Is, cum legatus, etc. De hac legatione sic scriptum est apud Macrob., libro I, cap. 5, Saturn.: Illos dico, quos Athenienses quondam ad senatum legavere, impetratum uti multam remitteret, quam civitati eorum fecerat, propter Oropi vastationem: ea multa fuerat talentum fere quingentum. Erant isti philosophi Carneades ex Academia, Diogenes Stoicus, Critolaus Peripateticus: quos ferunt, seorsum quemque ostentandi gratia per celeberrima urbis loca magno hominum conventu dissertasse. Fuit (ut relatum est) facundia Carneades violenta et rapida: scita et tereti Critolaus: modesta Diogenes, et sobria. Sed in senatum introducti, interprete usi sunt Caecilio senatore. Locus hic ex Gellii Noctibus Atticis desumptus est, lib. VII, cap. 14, ubi Auctor de tribus phraseos generibus verba facit. Atque haec dixit de causa legationis, cujus meminit Gell. sub finem, lib. XVII.

He, when as an envoy, etc. Of this embassy it is written thus in Macrobius, Saturnalia book I, ch. 5: "I mean those whom the Athenians once sent as envoys to the senate, to obtain remission of the fine it had imposed on their city for the sacking of Oropus: that fine had been about five hundred talents. These philosophers were Carneades of the Academy, Diogenes the Stoic, Critolaus the Peripatetic, who, they say, each separately, for display, held discourses in the most frequented places of the city before great gatherings of people. Carneades was (as is related) violent and rapid in eloquence; Critolaus clever and polished; Diogenes modest and sober. But when brought into the senate they used the senator Caecilius as interpreter." This passage is taken from Gellius's Attic Nights, book VII, ch. 14, where the author discusses the three kinds of style. And he said this of the cause of the embassy, which Gellius mentions near the end of book XVII.

(printed under page 311)

(7) ‹anchor: Galba, et Catone Censorio› · col 595

Galba, et Catone Censorio. Mss. 19 recentiores et 6 edit. habent Censoribus. At Censorio recte admodum praeferunt mss. 6 Reg. ex quibus duo sunt antiquissimi. 1 Sorbon., 2 Colb., Marm., 1 Lips., 1 Clarom. ac tredecim vulgati. Neque enim Galba, sed L. Val. Flaccus cum Catone censura functus est, ut ex Livio et Plutarcho omnes noverunt, qui in Historicorum monumentis versati sunt. Neque hoc ad Censores quidquam. Sed hi duo, ut oratores illius aetatis celeberrimi (quod ex Ciceronis Bruto intelligitur) eloquentissimorum virorum facundiam audivisse, significantur. BETULEIUS. — Catone Censorio. Rem conficit huc pertinens locus Quintil., l. XII Instit., c. 1, p. 1053: Neque Carneades ille, qui Romae audiente Censorio Catone non minoribus viribus contra justitiam dicitur disseruisse, quam pridie pro justitia dixerat, injustus ipse vir fuit. BUN.

Galba, and Cato the Censor. 19 more recent manuscripts and 6 editions have Censoribus (the censors). But 6 Royal manuscripts, two of them very old, 1 Sorbonne, 2 Colbert, Marm., 1 Leipzig, 1 Clermont and thirteen common editions quite rightly prefer Censorio. For it was not Galba but L. Valerius Flaccus who held the censorship with Cato, as all who are versed in the records of the historians know from Livy and Plutarch. Nor has this anything to do with censors. Rather these two, as the most famous orators of that age (as is understood from Cicero's Brutus), are meant to have heard the eloquence of the most eloquent men. BETULEIUS. — Cato the Censor. A relevant passage of Quintilian settles the matter, Institutes book XII, ch. 1, p. 1053: "Nor was that Carneades, who at Rome, in the hearing of Cato the Censor, is said to have argued against justice with no less force than he had spoken for justice the day before, himself an unjust man." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 311)

(8) ‹anchor: Sed idem› · col 596

Sed idem, etc. Quintil., lib. V, c. 1: Neque enim Academici, cum in utramque disserunt partem, non secundum alteram vivunt; neque Carneades ille, qui Romae, audiente Censorio Catone, non minoribus viribus contra justitiam dicitur disseruisse, quam pridie pro justitia dixerat, injustus ipse vir fuit, etc. Plutarchus multis scribit, quam aegre ipsos oratores in Civitate declamitantes tulerit. Plin., lib. VII, cap. 30, id ipsum paucissimis perstringit. Cato, inquit, Censorius in illa nobili trium sapientiae procerum ab Athenis legatione, audito Carneade, quam primum legatos eos censuit dimittendos; quoniam illo viro argumentante quid veri esset, haud facile discerni posset, etc.

But the same man, etc. Quintilian, book V, ch. 1: "For the Academics, when they argue on both sides, do not fail to live by one of them; nor was that Carneades, who at Rome, in the hearing of Cato the Censor, is said to have argued against justice with no less force than he had spoken for justice the day before, himself an unjust man," etc. Plutarch writes at length how ill he bore those orators declaiming in the city. Pliny, book VII, ch. 30, touches the same point in very few words. "Cato the Censor," he says, "at that famous embassy from Athens of three leaders in wisdom, having heard Carneades, judged that those envoys should be sent away as soon as possible; since, when that man argued, it could hardly be discerned what was true," etc.

(printed under page 311)

(9) ‹anchor: Cujus firma et stabilis debet esse sententia› · col 596

Cujus firma et stabilis debet esse sententia. Mss. 11 rec. et 2 edit. habent, cujus prudentia firma, etc. Scripti 10 rec. prudentiae. Hanc vocem rejiciunt antiquiores mss. et 15 vulgati.

Whose judgement ought to be firm and stable. 11 recent manuscripts and 2 editions have cujus prudentia firma, etc. 10 recent manuscripts, prudentiae. The older manuscripts and 15 common editions reject this word.

(printed under page 311)

(10) ‹anchor: Quidlibet afferentes› · col 596

Quidlibet afferentes. Ita restitui ex mss. veterrimis 1 Bonon., 2 Reg. et Pen. In Regio-Put. quidquid libet afferentes. Mss. Cauc., 12 alii rec. et 2 edit. quidlibet asserentes. Scripti rec. 4 et 2, quodlibet asserentes. Scripti 1 Reg. et 1 Colb. quidlibet disserentes.

Bringing forward anything at all. So I have restored from the very old manuscripts 1 Bologna, 2 Royal and Pen. In Regio-Puteanus, quidquid libet afferentes. The Cauc. manuscript, 12 other recent ones and 2 editions, quidlibet asserentes (asserting anything). 4 and 2 recent manuscripts, quodlibet asserentes. 1 Royal and 1 Colbert manuscript, quidlibet disserentes (discussing anything).

(printed under page 311)

(11) ‹anchor: Justitia evertitur› · col 596

Justitia evertitur. Scripti 11 recentiores et 5 edit. subvertitur.

Justice is overturned. 11 more recent manuscripts and 5 editions, subvertitur.

(printed under page 311)

(12) ‹anchor: Labefactare› · col 596

Labefactare. Mss. 5 Reg., 1 Sorbon., 1 Colb., 2 Clarom. labefactari. Scripti 11 rec. addunt, ut diceret anhelantem laborare; 2, labore; 9 edit. ut diceret inaniter laborari.

To shake. 5 Royal manuscripts, 1 Sorbonne, 1 Colbert, 2 Clermont, labefactari. 11 recent manuscripts add ut diceret anhelantem laborare (so that he might say it laboured, panting); 2, labore; 9 editions, ut diceret inaniter laborari (so that he might say it laboured in vain).

(printed under page 311)

(13) ‹anchor: Cerneretur› · col 596

Cerneretur. Mss. Tornes. et 1 Colb. a secunda manu, edit. Rom. 1470, et Crat. in marg. diceretur.

Should be discerned. The Tornaesius manuscript and 1 Colbert in the second hand, the Rome edition of 1470, and Cratander in the margin, diceretur.

(printed under page 311)

(14) ‹anchor: Ne secundam› · col 596

Ne secundam. Mss. 12 rec. nec.

Not even the second. 12 recent manuscripts, nec.

(printed under page 311)

(15) ‹anchor: Justitia quamvis› · col 596

Justitia quamvis, etc. Proverbium est, quod Aristoteles saepe, praesertim tamen in lib. V Moralium citat cap. 1, atque hanc justitiam generalem intelligit, quae specialem una cum aliis honesti partibus in generalitatis suae sinum complectitur.

Although justice, etc. It is a proverb which Aristotle cites often, but especially in book V of the Ethics, ch. 1; and he understands by it general justice, which embraces special justice, together with the other parts of the honourable, in the bosom of its generality.

(printed under page 311)

Page

  • running head: 595 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A CAPUT XV.; B ex praedicatione Ciceronis intelliget; C (in the notes, beside Possit. Scripti 11 rec.); D (in the notes, beside tia per celeberrima urbis loca)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: a stray mark before Quae at the head of the paragraph not set; the full-width heading VARIORUM NOTAE (cut off at the right edge) stands above the notes at the page foot and is not set; the Variorum notae (Quae... causa sit... putent? Magna ratio est. Posui...) are left for the later pass; the column ends mid-sentence at philosophi
PL 6:596
gravitate, cujus firma et stabilis debet esse sententia, sed quasi oratorio exercitii genere in utramque partem disserendi. Quod ille facere solebat, ut alios quidlibet afferentes posset refutare. Eam disputationem, qua justitia evertitur, apud Ciceronem L. Furius recordatur: credo, quoniam de republica disserebat, ut defensionem laudationemque ejus induceret, sine qua putabat regi non posse rempublicam. Carneades autem, ut Aristotelem refelleret ac Platonem justitiae patronos, prima illa disputatione collegit ea omnia, quae pro justitia dicebantur, ut posset illa, sicut fecit, evertere. Erat enim facillimum justitiam radices non habentem labefactare, quia tum nulla in terra fuit, ut quid esset, aut qualis, a philosophis cerneretur.
gravity, whose opinion ought to be firm and stable, but as if in an oratorical kind of exercise, arguing on both sides. This he was accustomed to do so that he could refute others who put forward anything whatever. That disputation by which justice is overturned is recalled by L. Furius in Cicero: I believe, since he was discoursing about the republic, in order to introduce the defence and praise of that justice without which he thought the republic could not be governed. But Carneades, in order to refute Aristotle and Plato, the patrons of justice, gathered together in that first disputation all the things that were said on behalf of justice, so that he might be able to overturn it, as he did. For it was very easy to shake justice, since it had no roots, because at that time there was none on earth, so that what it was, or of what kind, might be discerned by the philosophers.
Atque utinam tot ac tales viri, quantum eloquentiae quantumque animi, tantum etiam scientiae ad implendam defensionem summae virtutis habuissent, cujus origo in religione, ratio in aequitate est! Sed ii, qui primam illam partem nescierunt, ne secundam quidem tenere potuerunt. Volo autem prius circumscripte, ac breviter, quid sit ostendere, ut intelligatur philosophos ignorasse justitiam, nec id, quod minime noverant, potuisse defendere. Justitia quamvis omnes simul virtutes amplectatur, tamen duae sunt
And would that so many and such great men had possessed as much knowledge for carrying through the defence of the highest virtue as they had of eloquence and of spirit, the virtue whose origin is in religion and whose reason is in equity! But those who did not know that first part were not able to hold even the second. But I wish first to show, in a defined way and briefly, what it is, so that it may be understood that the philosophers were ignorant of justice and were unable to defend that which they did not know at all. Although justice embraces all the virtues together, yet there are two
Editors' notes and page, col. 596

Page

  • running head: [LA]CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 596 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A gravitate, cujus firma; B quantumque animi, tantum; C tone non minoribus (in the notes); D Quidlibet afferentes (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width heading "[VAR]IORUM NOTAE" stands below the text block, cut off at the left edge, not set; the Variorum notae below it are left for the later pass; "minime" has a damaged final e, read as minime; the column ends mid-sentence at "duae sunt"; the text-column fragments at the left belong to col. 595
PL 6:597
omnium principales, quae ab illa divelli separarique non possunt, pietas et aequitas. Nam fides, temperantia, probitas, innocentia, integritas, et caetera hujusmodi, vel natura, vel institutis parentum, possunt esse in iis hominibus qui justitiam nesciunt, sicuti semper fuerunt. Nam Romani veteres, qui justitia gloriari solebant, iis utique virtutibus gloriabantur, quae (ut dixi) proficisci a justitia possunt, et ab ipso fonte secerni. Pietas vero et aequitas, quasi venae sunt ejus; his enim duobus fontibus constat tota justitia. Sed caput ejus et origo in illo primo est, in secundo vis omnis ac ratio. Pietas autem nihil aliud est quam Dei notio; sicut Trismegistus verissime definivit, ut alio loco diximus. Si ergo pietas est cognoscere Deum, cujus cognitionis haec summa est, ut eum colas, ignorat utique justitiam, qui religionem Dei non tenet. Quomodo enim potest eam ipsam nosse, qui unde oriatur ignorat? Plato quidem multa de uno Deo locutus est, a quo ait constitutum esse mundum: sed nihil de religione; somniaverat enim Deum, non cognoverat. Quod si justitiae defensionem vel ipse, vel quilibet alius implere voluisset, in primis religiones deorum evertere debuit, quia contrariae sunt pietati. Quod quidem Socrates quia facere tentavit, in carcerem conjectus est; ut jam tunc appareret quid esset futurum iis hominibus, qui justitiam veram defendere, Deoque singulari servire coepissent.
the chief of all, which cannot be torn away and separated from it: piety and equity. For faith, temperance, probity, innocence, integrity, and the other things of this kind can exist, either by nature or by the teachings of parents, in those men who do not know justice, as they always have. For the ancient Romans, who used to glory in justice, certainly gloried in those virtues which (as I have said) can proceed from justice and be separated from the fountain itself. But piety and equity are, as it were, its veins; for the whole of justice consists of these two fountains. But its head and origin lies in the first, in the second all its force and rationale. Now piety is nothing else than the knowledge of God, as Trismegistus most truly defined it, as we have said in another place. If therefore piety is to know God, and the sum of this knowledge is that you worship Him, then he who does not hold the religion of God is certainly ignorant of justice. For how can he know that very thing, who is ignorant of whence it arises? Plato indeed said much about the one God, by Whom he says the world was established, but nothing about religion; for he had dreamed of God, he had not known Him. But if either he himself or anyone else had wished to carry out the defence of justice, he ought first of all to have overthrown the religions of the gods, because they are contrary to piety. And because Socrates indeed attempted to do this, he was thrown into prison, so that it might even then be apparent what was going to befall those men who should begin to defend true justice and to serve the one God.
Editors' notes and page, col. 597

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 312)

(1) ‹anchor: Vel natura› · col 597

Vel natura. Apud Plutarchum disputatio est, utrum virtus doceri possit.

Or by nature. In Plutarch there is a discussion whether virtue can be taught.

(printed under page 312)

(2) ‹anchor: Esse in iis hominibus› · col 597

Esse in iis hominibus. Mss. 4 Reg. recentissimi, 4 Colb., 1 Clarom., esse in iisdem hominibus; 6 edit. vet. inesse iisdem hominibus, cum 1 Reg. rec.

To be in those men. 4 very recent Royal manuscripts, 4 Colbert, 1 Clermont, esse in iisdem hominibus; 6 old editions, inesse iisdem hominibus, with 1 recent Royal.

(printed under page 312)

(3) ‹anchor: Pietas autem› · col 597

Pietas autem, etc. Supra, cap. 16, lib. II. Aliter autem philosophi et oratores pietatem definiunt. Nam Cic. in Rhet. Pietas, inquit, est per quam sanguine conjunctis, patriaeque et benevolis officium et diligens tribuitur cultus. Confundit igitur speciem cum specie; nam cultum deorum, religionem appellat. Divisio ergo illa Ciceronis negligenda prorsus est, ut quae hanc disputationem non modo nihil juvat, sed etiam vehementer remoratur. Idem Cic., de Nat. deor., pietatem definit, justitiam esse adversus deos, sanctitatem vero scientiam colendorum deorum.

But piety, etc. Above, book II, ch. 16. The philosophers and orators define piety otherwise. For Cicero in the Rhetoric says: "Piety is that by which duty and diligent care are rendered to those joined to us by blood, to our country, and to those well disposed to us." So he confuses one species with another; for the worship of the gods he calls religion. That division of Cicero's must therefore be wholly set aside, as one which not only does nothing to help this discussion but greatly hinders it. The same Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods, defines piety as justice towards the gods, and holiness as the knowledge of how the gods are to be worshipped.

(printed under page 312)

(4) ‹anchor: Trismegistus› · col 597

Trismegistus. In Pimand., cap. 9.

Trismegistus. In the Pimander, ch. 9.

(printed under page 312)

(5) ‹anchor: Alio loco› · col 597

Alio loco. Vide lib. II, cap. 16, et lib. III, cap. 9.

In another place. See book II, ch. 16, and book III, ch. 9.

(printed under page 312)

(6) ‹anchor: Potest eam ipsam nosse› · col 597

Potest eam ipsam nosse. Vox ipsam abest a 2 Reg. et 7 editis. In 1 Clarom. est noscere.

Can know it itself. The word ipsam is missing from 2 Royal and 7 editions. In 1 Clermont is noscere.

(printed under page 312)

(7) ‹anchor: Qui› · col 597

Qui. Ita emendo ex mss. 1 Bon. antiq., 6 Colb., 1 Clar., edit. Rom. 1470, Paris. 1525, aliisque 11. In caeteris quae, male.

Who. So I correct from the manuscripts old Bologna 1, 6 Colbert, 1 Clermont, the Rome edition of 1470, Paris 1525, and 11 others. In the rest quae, wrongly.

(printed under page 312)

(8) ‹anchor: Plato› · col 597

Plato. In Timaeo, sub initium.

Plato. In the Timaeus, near the beginning.

(printed under page 312)

(9) ‹anchor: Socrates› · col 597

Socrates. Nota Socratem negantem plures deos esse.

Socrates. Note that Socrates denied that there are many gods.

(printed under page 312)

(10) ‹anchor: Quid esset futurum iis hominibus› · col 597

Quid esset futurum iis hominibus. Sic restitui ex cunctis prope mss. et 15 editis. In 2 Colb. est his omnibus; in nonnullis impressis legitur in hominibus.

What would befall those men. So I have restored from nearly all the manuscripts and 15 editions. In 2 Colbert is his omnibus; in some printed editions one reads in hominibus.

(printed under page 312)

(11) ‹anchor: Defendere› · col 597

Defendere. 1 Colb. et Brun. defenderent. Utraque lectio bona.

To defend. 1 Colbert and Brun., defenderent. Both readings are good.

(printed under page 312)

(12) ‹anchor: Singulari› · col 597

Singulari. Id est, unico, verbo Lactantio familiari.

Single. That is, unique: a word familiar to Lactantius.

(printed under page 312)

(13) ‹anchor: Altera est justitiae pars aequitas› · col 597

Altera est justitiae pars aequitas. Sic mss. 2 Reg. antiquissimi, 3 al. Reg., 1 Colbert., Marm., Scripti, 16 rec. et impressi addunt igitur.

The other part of justice is equity. So 2 very old Royal manuscripts, 3 other Royal, 1 Colbert, Marm. The manuscripts, 16 recent, and the printed editions add igitur (therefore).

(printed under page 312)

(14) ‹anchor: Quam Cicero aequabilitatem vocat› · col 597

Quam Cicero aequabilitatem vocat. Ita antiquiores et potiores mss. ac edit. 12. In scriptis 16 rec. et 5 vulgatis legitur aequalitatem. Utraque lectio bona, estque apud Ciceronem. Vide Ciceronem, lib. II de Oratore et lib. I de Officiis, cap. 32. Sic etiam Cicero, lib. II (continued on col 598) de Officiis, cap. 25. In Juris aequabilitate exercenda etiam est facilitas.

Which Cicero calls evenness. So the older and better manuscripts and 12 editions. In 16 recent manuscripts and 5 common editions one reads aequalitatem (equality). Both readings are good, and are in Cicero. See Cicero, On the Orator book II, and On Duties book I, ch. 32. So too Cicero, On Duties book II, ch. 25: "In administering evenness of law there is also ease of access."

(printed under page 312)

(15) ‹anchor: Omnes aequos› · col 598

Omnes aequos, etc. Politian. ex Plat. non dubitavit asserere: Non esse quemquam regum, qui non sit e servis ortus; nec servum cui non sit origo regis, omnia enim ista tempus miscuit. Audiatur vetus sapiens Boeth. Metro VI: Omne hominum genus in terris / Simili surgit ab ortu, / Unus enim rerum pater est, / Unus cuncta ministrat, etc. Adstipulatur Euripid. in Alexand. JOH. WEITSIUS.

All equal, etc. Politian, from Plato, did not hesitate to assert: "There is no king who has not sprung from slaves, nor any slave who has not a king for ancestor; for time has mingled all these things." Let the old sage Boethius be heard, Metre VI: "The whole race of men on earth / Rises from a like birth; / For there is one Father of things, / One who provides all," etc. Euripides agrees, in the Alexander. JOHANN WEITZ.

(printed under page 312)

(16) ‹anchor: Nemo a beneficiis... segregatur› · col 598

Nemo a beneficiis... segregatur. Lib. I, c. 5; lib. IV, c. 23; lib. VII, c. 18. In his et sequentibus mutatis verbis sequitur Cyprianum de Eleemos. ed. Oxon. f. 208: Nec quisquam a beneficiis ejus et muneribus arcetur, quominus omne humanum genus bonitate ac largitate divina aequaliter perfruatur. Sic aequaliter dies luminat, sol radiat, imber rigat, ventus adspirat; et dormientibus somnus unus est, et stellarum splendor ac lunae communis est. Quo aequalitatis (lego ex Bodl., lib. I, c. 2, aequitatis) exemplo Dei patris imitator est. BUN.

No one is shut out from the benefits... Book I, ch. 5; book IV, ch. 23; book VII, ch. 18. In this and what follows he follows, with words changed, Cyprian On Almsgiving, Oxford edition, f. 208: "Nor is anyone kept from his benefits and gifts, so that the whole human race may equally enjoy the divine goodness and bounty. So the day gives light equally, the sun shines, the rain waters, the wind blows; and for sleepers there is one sleep, and the splendour of the stars and of the moon is common. By this example of equality" (I read, from the Bodleian, book I, ch. 2, aequitatis, of equity) "he is an imitator of God the Father." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 312)

(17) ‹anchor: Servus est› · col 598

Servus est. Jus civile quoddam est civitati christianae constitutum aequabile, quo omnes ii utantur, qui Deo nomen dederunt: quae quidem Juris communicatio multis locis a B. Paulo memoratur, ad Corinth. Epistola priori, cap. XII, et Epist. ad Ephesios, cap. IV.

Is a slave. A kind of civil law, equal for all, has been established for the Christian commonwealth, which all who have given their name to God enjoy: this sharing of law is mentioned in many places by blessed Paul, in the First Epistle to the Corinthians, ch. XII, and the Epistle to the Ephesians, ch. IV.

(printed under page 312)

(18) ‹anchor: Clarissimus... perfectissimus› · col 598

Clarissimus... perfectissimus. His epithetis Lactantius amat alludere ad titulos, quibus pro ratione dignitatis multi cohonestati sunt. Nam praefectus urbi vir gloriosissimus dicebatur; praefecti praetorio per Illyricum, viri eminentissimi; vir spectabilis praefectus Aegypti; viri clarissimi rectores provinciarum; vir perfectissimus praeses Galliae. Qua de re vide Cangii glossarium his verbis, Perfectissimus; Clarissimus; Egregiatus. Vide Not. ad caput 21, libri de Mortibus persecutorum; et Pancir. in Notit. Dignitatum, c. 2 et seqq.

Most illustrious... most perfect. With these epithets Lactantius likes to allude to the titles with which many were honoured according to their rank. For the prefect of the city was called most glorious; the praetorian prefects for Illyricum, most eminent; the prefect of Egypt, respectable; the governors of provinces, most illustrious; the governor of Gaul, most perfect. On this see Du Cange's Glossary under the words Perfectissimus, Clarissimus, Egregiatus. See the note on ch. 21 of On the Deaths of the Persecutors; and Panciroli on the Notitia Dignitatum, ch. 2 and following.

(printed under page 312)

Page

  • running head: 597 LIBER V. DE JUST[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹omnium principales, quae ab illa›; B ‹las, ignorat utique justitiam›; C ‹Vel natura. Apud Plutarchum› (in the notes); D ‹Qui. Ita emendo ex mss.› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width heading "VARIORUM NOT[AE]" below the text block, cut off at the image edge, not set; the Variorum Notae beneath it (Vel natura. Apud Plutarchum ... ) left for the later apparatus pass; a reader's hand-drawn underline and stroke under "Pietas autem ... Dei notio" in the scan, not set; "Digitized" watermark at the foot not set; column ends at a sentence end, no word split
PL 6:598
Altera est justitiae pars aequitas: aequitatem dico non utique bene judicandi, quod e⟨t⟩ ipsum laudabile est in homine justo; sed se cum caeteris coaequandi, quam Cicero aequabilitatem vocat. Deus enim, qui homines generat, et inspirat, omnes aequos, id est pares esse voluit. Eamdem conditionem vivendi omnibus posuit, omnes ad sapientiam genuit, omnibus immortalitatem spopondit: nemo a beneficiis ejus coelestibus segregatur. Nam sicut omnibus unicum suum lumen aequaliter dividit, emittit omnibus fontes, victum subministrat, quietem somni dulcissimam tribuit: sic omnibus aequitatem virtutemque largitur. Nemo apud eum servus est, nemo dominus. Si enim cunctis idem pater est, aequo jure omnes liberi sumus. Nemo Deo pauper est, nisi qui justitia indiget; nemo dives, nisi qui virtutibus plenus est; nemo denique egregius, nisi qui bonus et innocens fuerit; nemo clarissimus, nisi qui opera misericordiae largiter fecerit; nemo perfectissimus, nisi qui omnes gradus virtutis impleverit. Quare neque Romani, neque Graeci justitiam tenere potuerunt, quia dispares multis gradibus homines habuerunt, a pauperibus ad divites, ab humilibus ad potentes, a privatis denique usque ad regum sublimissimas potestates. Ubi enim non sunt universi pares, aequitas non est; et excludit inaequalitas ipsa justitiam, cujus vis omnis in eo est, ut pares faciat eos, qui ad hujus vitae conditionem pari sorte venerunt.
The other part of justice is equity: by equity I mean not, of course, that of judging well, which is itself also praiseworthy in a just man, but that of making oneself equal with the rest, which Cicero calls equability. For God, Who begets men and breathes life into them, willed that all should be equal, that is, alike. He set the same condition of living for all, He begot all for wisdom, He promised immortality to all; no one is cut off from His heavenly benefits. For just as He divides His one light equally among all, sends forth springs for all, supplies food, and grants the sweetest repose of sleep, so He bestows equity and virtue upon all. With Him no one is a slave, no one a master. For if the same Father belongs to all, we are all free by equal right. No one is poor in God's sight except him who lacks justice; no one rich except him who is full of virtues; no one, finally, eminent except him who has been good and innocent; no one most illustrious except him who has done works of mercy abundantly; no one most perfect except him who has fulfilled every degree of virtue. Therefore neither the Romans nor the Greeks could hold fast to justice, because they had men unequal by many degrees, from the poor to the rich, from the lowly to the powerful, from private persons, finally, up to the most exalted powers of kings. For where all are not equal, there is no equity; and inequality itself excludes justice, whose whole force lies in this, that it makes equal those who have come into the condition of this life by an equal lot.
Editors' notes and page, col. 598

Page

  • running head: …ER V. DE JUSTITIA. 598 (cut off at left edge)
  • marginal letters: A Altera est justitiae pars; B qui virtutibus plenus est; C de Officiis, cap. 25 (in the notes); D luminat, sol radiat (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "e⟨t⟩" (quod et ipsum): the t is damaged and prints like a colon. The full-width heading "…ARIORUM NOTAE" (Variorum notae), cut off at left, stands below the text and is not set. The Variorum notes at the page foot (de Officiis… to Notit. Dignitatum, c. 2 et seqq.) are left for the later pass. Line-ends of the neighbouring column 597 are visible at left and are not set. Liberi may also carry the sense "children"; it is rendered "free".
PL 6:599
CAPUT XVI.
Chapter XVI.
De officiis viri justi, et aequitate Christianorum.
On the duties of the just man, and the equity of the Christians.
Duobus igitur illis justitiae fontibus immutatis, omnis virtus, et omnis veritas tollitur, et ipsa justitia remigrat in coelum. Ideo non est illud verum bonum a philosophis repertum, quia ignorabant vel unde oriretur, vel quid efficeret; quod nullis aliis, praeterquam nostro populo revelatum est. Dicet aliquis: Nonne sunt apud vos alii pauperes, alii divites; alii
Therefore, when those two fountains of justice have been changed, all virtue and all truth is taken away, and justice itself goes back to heaven. For this reason that true good was not found by the philosophers, because they did not know either whence it arose or what it brought about; and this has been revealed to no others except our people. Someone will say: Are there not among you some who are poor, others who are rich; some
Editors' notes and page, col. 599

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> <!-- Q3b: note (1)'s lemma (first line of the notes in col 599) and its continuation at the top of col 600's notes were completed from the column images c599_1 and c600_1, which show the lines the foot crop missed. --> (printed under page 313)

(1) ‹anchor: Nonne sunt apud vos alii pauperes, alii divites› · col 599

Nonne sunt apud vos alii pauperes, alii divites, etc. Hic infra observamus ex Salmasio, ex appellatione fraternitatis mutua inter primos christianos, illos vixisse etiam tanquam fratres, in commune conferentes quod habebant, praeter uxores, ut notat Tertull. Hoc vero non ita accipiendum esse, quasi omnia omnium bona communia inter illos fuerint, ut fuisse certum est Apostolorum tempore in ecclesia Hierosolymitana, ex hoc Lactantii loco manifestum est, et ex ipso Tertull. loco laudato Apol. eadem pagina: Etiam si quod arcae genus est, inquit, non de honoraria summa quasi redemptae religionis congregatur. Modicam unusquisque stipem menstrua die, vel cum velit, et si modo velit, et si modo possit, apponit. Nam nemo compellitur, sed sponte confert. Haec quasi deposita pietatis sunt. Si quantum quisque vellet, conferebat, idque singulis mensibus, non universorum bonorum fiebat collatio, sed stipis tantum modicae. Genus ἐράνου plane hoc fuit, in singulis christianorum ecclesiis per singulos menses colligi soliti. Ad quem usum dispensaretur, statim subjicit, ad egenos nempe alendos, et humandos. Nam inde non epulis, nec potaculis, nec ingratis voratrinis dispensatur, sed egenis alendis, humandisque, et pueris ac puellis re ac parentibus destitutis, jamque domesticis senibus. Justinus Martyr in 2 Apologia ejusdem collatitiae stipis, sive ἐράνου a christianis fieri soliti meminit, nisi quod nihil habet de menstrua die. Quomodo igitur, si hoc genere tantum collationis usi, indiscreta omnia apud ipsos dicere potuit idem Tertullianus? An non haec inter se pugnant? Nam generalis collatio universorum bonorum pauperes divitibus exaequat; et praestat, ut in eo coetu, in quo singuli omne, quod habent, conferunt, nemo dives sit aut pauper, sed omnes invicem aequales. Atqui vel ex Tertulliano liquet alios tum fuisse pauperes in Ecclesia, alios divites. Nam ad alendos pauperes, conferebant divites. Quae aequalitas nescio an unquam in Ecclesia christiana obtinuerit, ne aetate quidem Apostolorum. Hujusmodi enim collectas etiam sub Apostolis ex eorum praescripto frequentatas constat ex Paulo Epist. I ad Corinth., cap. XVI. Quomodo faciendas instituerit, ibidem legere est. Ab eo tempore collectarum ille mos, de quo S. Justinus et Tertullianus, in Ecclesiis servatus est. At quid opus hujusmodi collectis, si bonorum a singulis facta universorum collatio? In ecclesia Hierosolymitana illa communio locum tantum videtur habuisse, ut Lucas refert in Actis, cap. IV. Quod et ipsum tamen liberum cuique fuit facere, et non facere, ut Petrus capite sequenti ad Ananiam dixit, qui pretii partem ex divenditis bonis subtraxerat, et reliquum ad Apostolorum pedes abjecerat. Sed quomodo conciliabitur quod auctores scribunt de communicatione rei familiaris inter Christianos fieri consueta, si communio illa abfuit, quam plerique fuisse imaginantur? Certe et Justinus, qui collectae illius meminit, qua quisque arbitratu suo in arcam communem conferebat, in eadem Apologia tradit, hoc christianorum disciplinae fuisse proprium, ut in commune conferrent quae haberent. Ostendit quae differentia fuerit ea in re Gentilis et Christiani. Olim, inquit, cum Gentiles eramus, quaestum lucrumque (continued on col 600) ante omnia sectari soliti, nunc quae habemus in commune conferentes, omni indigenti ea communicamus. Toto certe coelo deerrarunt, qui sibi persuasere ex illis testimoniis, veteres christianos omnia revera bona inter se habuisse communia, quibus pro indiviso in medium collatis unusquisque frueretur. Ut aequalitas dignitatum inter ipsos non in ipsis personis fuit, sed in animo, quo se major parem minori ferebat, et dominus servum non aliter tractabat, quam si frater esset, ita et communio bonorum apud eos non in re ipsa fuisse dignoscitur, sed in voluntate sola communicandi, quam et effectus sequebatur, si usus veniret. SALMASIUS.

Are there not among you some poor, others rich, etc. Here below we observe, following Salmasius, that from the mutual name of brotherhood among the first Christians, they also lived as brothers, putting in common what they had, except wives, as Tertullian notes. But that this is not to be taken as though all the goods of all were common among them, as it is certain they were in the Apostles' time in the church of Jerusalem, is plain from this passage of Lactantius, and from the very passage of Tertullian's Apology cited, on the same page: "Even if there is a kind of treasury," he says, "it is not filled from fees, as if religion were bought. Each one puts in a modest coin on the monthly day, or when he wishes, and only if he wishes, and only if he can. For no one is compelled; he contributes freely. These are, as it were, the deposits of piety." If each contributed as much as he wished, and that monthly, there was no pooling of all goods, but only of a modest coin. This was plainly a kind of eranos, customarily collected each month in each of the Christian churches. To what use it was spent he adds at once: namely to feed and bury the needy. "For it is not spent on feasts or drinking-bouts or thankless eating-houses, but on feeding and burying the needy, and on boys and girls without means and without parents, and on old people now confined to the house." Justin Martyr in the 2nd Apology mentions the same contributed coin, or eranos, customarily made by the Christians, except that he says nothing of a monthly day. How then, if they used only this kind of contribution, could the same Tertullian say that all things were undivided among them? Do these things not conflict? For a general pooling of all goods makes the poor equal to the rich, and ensures that in a gathering in which each contributes all he has, no one is rich or poor, but all are equal to one another. Yet even from Tertullian it is clear that some in the Church were then poor and others rich. For the rich contributed to feed the poor. I do not know whether such equality ever obtained in the Christian Church, not even in the age of the Apostles. For it is established from Paul, 1 Corinthians ch. XVI, that collections of this kind were frequent even under the Apostles, by their direction. How he ordered them to be made may be read in the same place. From that time the custom of collections of which St Justin and Tertullian speak was kept in the Churches. But what need of such collections, if all goods had been pooled by each? That community seems to have had place only in the church of Jerusalem, as Luke relates in Acts ch. IV. And even that each was free to do or not do, as Peter said in the next chapter to Ananias, who had kept back part of the price of the goods he sold and thrown the rest at the Apostles' feet. But how will what the authors write of a sharing of household goods customary among Christians be reconciled, if there was not that community which most imagine there was? Certainly Justin too, who mentions that collection, into which each contributed to the common chest at his own discretion, relates in the same Apology that it was characteristic of Christian discipline to put in common what they had. He shows what the difference was in this matter between a Gentile and a Christian. "Formerly," he says, "when we were Gentiles, we were accustomed to pursue gain and profit before all else; now, putting what we have in common, we share it with everyone in need." Those certainly went wildly astray who persuaded themselves from these testimonies that the early Christians really had all goods in common among themselves, each enjoying them as brought undivided into the common stock. As equality of rank among them lay not in their persons themselves but in the mind, by which the greater bore himself as equal to the lesser, and the master treated the slave no otherwise than if he were a brother, so too the community of goods among them is seen to have lain not in the thing itself, but solely in the will to share, which was followed by the deed when need arose. SALMASIUS.

(printed under page 313)

(2) ‹anchor: Fratrum nomen impertiamus› · col 600

Fratrum nomen impertiamus. Clemens Strom. II: Ideo nos fratres, quod eodem verbo regenerati. Euseb. Emiss. Homil. IV: Fratres, sorores, non natura, sed officio et affectione; quos enim diligimus, his nominibus vocare solemus. WOUWER. — Noluit Deus, ut jam ante notavimus, ullum reperiri egentem in populo suo, sed omnes tanquam fratres inter se vivere, ut erant ab uno parente omnes. Haec fratrum appellatio inter christianos etiam aliquandiu viguit, nec solum tantisper dum intra Hierosolymitanam civitatem sub apostolis Ecclesia Christi stetit, sed etiam aliis, in quibus propagata est locis; praesertim quamdiu fuit persecutionibus vexata. Nec fratres modo invicem se appellabant, quod unius Dei parentis homines, quod consortes ejusdem fidei, et spei cohaeredes, ut ait Minucius, sed etiam quia fraterno inter se more viverent, ut solent fratres, qui pro indiviso paternis bonis una fruuntur. In commune quod quisque habebat, conferebant, convivia communia agitabant, dilectionis nomine vocitata; nihil indiscretum denique habebant, praeter uxores, ut ait Tertullianus in Apologetico, cap. 39, qui hanc etiam fraterni nominis inter christianos communicati causam affert. At quanto, inquit, dignius fratres et dicuntur, et habentur, qui unum patrem Deum agnoverint, qui unum spiritum biberint sanctitatis, qui de uno utero ignorantiae ejusdem ad unam lucem expaverint veritatis. Sed eo fortasse minus legitimi existimamur, quia nulla de nostra fraternitate tragoedia exclamat, vel quia ex substantia familiari fratres sumus, quae penes vos fere dirimit fraternitatem. Itaque qui animo animaque miscemur, nihil de rei communicatione dubitamus. Omnia indiscreta sunt apud nos, praeter uxores.

Let us bestow the name of brothers. Clement, Stromata II: "We are brothers because we have been reborn by the same Word." Eusebius of Emesa, Homily IV: "Brothers, sisters, not by nature but by duty and affection; for those whom we love we are wont to call by these names." WOUWER. — God did not wish, as we noted before, that anyone should be found in need among his people, but that all should live together as brothers, as they all were from one parent. This name of brothers among Christians flourished for some time, not only while the Church of Christ stood within the city of Jerusalem under the apostles, but in the other places to which it spread; especially as long as it was harried by persecutions. Nor did they call one another brothers only "because they are men of one God and Father, sharers of the same faith and co-heirs of hope," as Minucius says, but also because they lived among themselves in brotherly fashion, as brothers do who enjoy their father's goods together undivided. Whatever each had they put in common, held common banquets called by the name of love; in short, they had nothing undivided except wives, as Tertullian says in the Apology, ch. 39, who also gives this reason for the name of brother shared among Christians. "But how much more worthily," he says, "are they called and held brothers, who have acknowledged one Father, God, who have drunk one Spirit of holiness, who from one womb of the same ignorance have come trembling to the one light of truth. But perhaps we are thought less legitimate because no tragedy cries out about our brotherhood, or because we are brothers through our family property, which among you generally breaks up brotherhood. So we who are mingled in mind and soul have no hesitation about sharing goods. All things are undivided among us except wives."

(printed under page 313)

(3) ‹anchor: Corporum› · col 600

Corporum. Heumannus legendum esse putat servorum.

Of bodies. Heumann thinks one should read servorum (of slaves).

(printed under page 313)

(4) ‹anchor: Nisi quod possunt› · col 600

Nisi quod possunt, etc. Mss. Cauc., Jun. ac 3 Reg. rec. et 14 impressi, nisi quos. Utraque lectio bona. Sed ea quae est in textu genuina nobis visa est ex mss. 2 Bonon., 5 Reg. vet., 6 Colbert. multisque aliis et edit. Is. petita, et praecedentibus et sequentibus confirmata. Vide supra, nisi quia pares esse nos credimus; et infra, quia et non egent.

Except that they can, etc. The Cauc. and Junius manuscripts and 3 recent Royal, and 14 printed, nisi quos. Both readings are good. But the one in the text seemed to us genuine, taken from 2 Bologna manuscripts, 5 old Royal, 6 Colbert and many others and Isaeus's edition, and confirmed by what precedes and follows. See above, "except that we believe ourselves to be equals"; and below, "because they are not in need either."

(printed under page 313)

(5) ‹anchor: Non quia divitias habent, sed quia utuntur illis› · col 600

Non quia divitias habent, sed quia utuntur illis. Ita mss. 8 Reg, 5 Colbert. Brun. aliique, cum nonnullis editis. Bene. Vide infra quia et non egent. Mss. Cauc. Jun., 2 Reg. rec. 1 Colb. et 8 vulgati, non qui divitias habent, sed qui; non inepte tamen.

Not because they have riches, but because they use them. So 8 Royal manuscripts, 5 Colbert, Brun. and others, with some editions. Rightly. See below, "because they are not in need either." The Cauc. and Junius manuscripts, 2 recent Royal, 1 Colbert and 8 common editions, non qui divitias habent, sed qui (not those who have riches, but those who); not unfittingly, however.

(printed under page 313)

Page

  • running head: FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. (cut off at the image edge; column number 599 at left)
  • marginal letters: A ‹CAPUT XVI.› (in the gutter, beside the first line of the facing column, servi, a); B ‹fraternitatis mutua inter primos christianos› (in the notes); C ‹humandos. Nam inde non epulis› (in the notes); D ‹faciendas instituerit, ibidem legere est› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-sentence at alii. The full-width heading VARIORUM NOTAE (cut off at the right edge) stands below the text block and is not set. The Variorum Notae at the page foot (Nonne sunt apud vos alii pauperes...) are apparatus left for the later pass.
PL 6:600
servi, alii domini? Nonne aliquid inter singulos interest? nihil; nec alia causa est, cur nobis invicem fratrum nomen impertiamus, nisi quia pares esse nos credimus. Nam cum omnia humana non corpore, sed spiritu metiamur, tametsi corporum sit diversa conditio, nobis tamen servi non sunt; sed eos et habemus, et dicimus spiritu fratres, religione conservos. Divitiae quoque non faciunt insignes, nisi quod possunt bonis operibus facere clariores. Divites sunt enim, non quia divitias habent, sed quia utuntur illis
slaves, others masters? Is there not some difference between individuals? None; nor is there any other reason why we bestow on one another the name of brothers, except that we believe ourselves to be equals. For since we measure all human things not by the body but by the spirit, although the condition of bodies is different, yet to us they are not slaves; but we both regard them and call them brothers in spirit, fellow servants in religion. Riches too do not make men distinguished, except in that they can make them more illustrious through good works. For men are rich, not because they have riches, but because they use them
Editors' notes and page, col. 600

Page

  • running head: CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 600 (the start of the head is cut off at the image edge; presumably LACTANTII)
  • marginal letters: A ‹servi, alii domini?›; B ‹commune conferentes, omni indigenti› (in the notes); C ‹tio inter christianos etiam› (in the notes); D ‹mat, vel quia ex substantia› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: The full-width heading "ARIORUM NOTÆ" (VARIORUM NOTAE), which is cut off at the left edge, stands between the text and the notes and is not set. The Variorum notes below it (from "que ante omnia sectari soliti" to "non inepte tamen") are the page-foot commentary and are left for the later pass. Fragments of the neighbouring column at the left edge are not set.
PL 6:601
ad opera justitiae. Et qui pauperes videntur, eo tamen divites sunt, quia et non egent, et nihil concupiscunt.
for the works of justice. And those who seem poor are nevertheless rich in this, that they both lack nothing and covet nothing.
Cum igitur et liberi servis, et divites pauperibus humilitate animi pares simus, apud Deum tamen virtute discernimur. Et tanto quisque sublimior est, quanto justior. Si enim justitia est, parem se etiam minoribus facere, quanquam hoc ipso praecellat, quod se inferioribus coaequavit; tamen si non tantum quasi parem, sed etiam quasi minorem se gesserit, utique multo altiorem dignitatis gradum, Deo judice, consequetur. Nam profecto in hac vita saeculari, quoniam brevia et caduca sunt omnia, et praeferunt se alteris homines, et de dignitate contendunt: quo nihil foedius, nihil arrogantius, nihil a sapientis ratione semotius. Rebus enim coelestibus contraria sunt ista universa terrena. Sicut enim sapientia hominum summa stultitia est apud Deum, stultitia autem (ut docui) summa sapientia est: sic Deo humilis et abjectus est, qui fuerit conspicuus et sublimis in terra. Nam ut taceam, quod haec praesentia terrae bona, quibus magnus honos tribuitur, virtuti contraria sunt, et vigorem mentis enervant; quae tandem potest firma esse nobilitas, quae opes, quae potentia, cum possit Deus reges quoque ipsos inferiores etiam infimis facere? Et ideo consulens nobis Deus, inter divina praecepta illud praecipue posuit: Qui se extollit, humiliabitur; et qui se humiliat, exaltabitur. Cujus praecepti salubritas docet, quod qui se apud homines planum fecerit, humilemque praebuerit, hic apud Deum praecellens et insignis habeatur.
Since therefore we, free men with slaves and rich men with poor, are equal in humility of mind, yet before God we are distinguished by virtue. And each one is the more exalted, the more just he is. For if it is justice to make oneself equal even to lesser men, although by this very thing one excels, that one has made oneself equal to inferiors, yet if one has conducted oneself not only as an equal but even as a lesser, one will certainly attain a much higher degree of dignity, with God as judge. For assuredly in this worldly life, since all things are brief and perishable, men both set themselves above one another and contend about dignity: than which nothing is more foul, nothing more arrogant, nothing further removed from the reasoning of a wise man. For all these earthly things are contrary to heavenly things. For just as the wisdom of men is the highest folly before God, while folly (as I have taught) is the highest wisdom, so he is lowly and abject before God who has been conspicuous and exalted on earth. For, to say nothing of the fact that these present goods of the earth, to which great honour is paid, are contrary to virtue and enervate the vigour of the mind, what nobility, pray, can be firm, what wealth, what power, when God can make even kings themselves lower than the lowest? And therefore God, taking thought for us, placed this especially among the divine precepts: He who exalts himself will be humbled; and he who humbles himself will be exalted. The salutariness of this precept teaches that whoever has made himself level among men and has shown himself humble, he is held excellent and distinguished before God.
Editors' notes and page, col. 601

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 314)

(1) ‹anchor: Et qui pauperes videntur› · col 601

Et qui pauperes videntur. Sic restitui ex mss. Reg. Put. et 5 al. Reg., 1 Colb., 2 Clarom. aliisque, et 15 impressis. Scripti 9 et nonnulli vulgati habent et quia.

And those who seem poor. So I have restored from the Regio-Puteanus manuscript and 5 other Royal, 1 Colbert, 2 Clermont and others, and 15 printed. 9 manuscripts and some common editions have et quia.

(printed under page 314)

(2) ‹anchor: Quia et non egent› · col 601

Quia et non egent. Ita mss. 4 Reg. vet. multique alii, cum pluribus editis. Vocem non respuunt 11 mss. rec. et 3 vulg.

Because they are not in need either. So 4 old Royal manuscripts and many others, with most editions. 11 recent manuscripts and 3 common editions reject the word non.

(printed under page 314)

(3) ‹anchor: Sublimior est› · col 601

Sublimior est. Alludere videtur ad illud Ciceronis, qui in libro Officiorum ait, quemque tanto sublimiorem esse quanto humilius se gesserit.

Is more exalted. He seems to allude to Cicero's saying in the book On Duties, that "each is the more exalted the more humbly he has borne himself."

(printed under page 314)

(4) ‹anchor: In hac vita saeculari› · col 601

In hac vita saeculari. Id est, temporali, ut infra cap. 18, et lib. VII, cap. 4 et 11. Hic deesse aliquid videtur; manca est enim oratio.

In this worldly life. That is, temporal, as below, ch. 18, and book VII, chs. 4 and 11. Something seems to be missing here, for the sentence is defective.

(printed under page 314)

(5) ‹anchor: A Sapientis ratione› · col 601

A Sapientis ratione. Mss. 6, sapientia. Ex mss. veterrimis pluribusque aliis expunxi et, quod erat in quibusdam editis.

From the reasoning of the wise man. 6 manuscripts, sapientia. From the very old manuscripts and many others I have struck out et, which was in some editions.

(printed under page 314)

(6) ‹anchor: Semotius› · col 601

Semotius. Mss. 5, submotius; 6, summotius; 2, remotius. Caeteri et omnes editi, semotius. Apud Lucretium, lib. I, vers. 46, a curis semotus.

More removed. 5 manuscripts, submotius; 6, summotius; 2, remotius. The rest and all the editions, semotius. In Lucretius, book I, line 46, "removed from cares."

(printed under page 314)

(7) ‹anchor: Apud Deum› · col 601

Apud Deum. I Cor. I.

With God. 1 Corinthians 1.

(printed under page 314)

(8) ‹anchor: Firma› · col 601

Firma. Mss. Brun., summa.

Firm. The Brun. manuscript, summa (highest).

(printed under page 314)

(9) ‹anchor: Se extollit› · col 601

Se extollit. Luc. XIV et XVIII; Mat. XXVIII.

Exalts himself. Luke 14 and 18; Matthew 28 [as printed].

(printed under page 314)

(10) ‹anchor: Exposui› · col 601

Exposui, etc. Hucusque integra Epitome Lactantiana caruimus. Fragmentum illius hoc loco incipiebat. Nunc cura Pfaffii habemus integram fere. Quod propterea moneo, ut studiosus eam cum ipso opere diligenter conferat. Sic enim intelliget eamdem rem saepius bene dici posse; augebit praeterea hac ratione dicendi copiam; et experietur, id quod verum est, ejusdem esse artificis breviter et copiose dicere. Fiet porro ut, detracto eloquentiae copiosioris ornatu, rem propius contueatur. BETULEIUS.

I have set out, etc. Until now we lacked the complete Epitome of Lactantius; the fragment of it began at this place. Now, through Pfaff's care, we have it almost whole. I mention this so that the student may carefully compare it with the work itself. For so he will understand that the same thing can often be said well; he will besides increase his copiousness of speech in this way; and he will find, what is true, that it belongs to the same craftsman to speak briefly and copiously. It will also come about that, with the ornament of fuller eloquence removed, he will view the matter more closely. BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 314)

(11) ‹anchor: Quae a philosophis afferebantur› · col 601

Quae a philosophis afferebantur. Ita mss. antiquiores et meliores ac 10 editi. In scriptis 10 rec. et 4 excusis est asserebantur; in 3 mss. rec. et 3 vet. edit. (continued on col 602) Rom., disserebantur.

Which were brought forward by the philosophers. So the older and better manuscripts and 10 editions. In 10 recent manuscripts and 4 printed is asserebantur; in 3 recent manuscripts and 3 old Rome editions, disserebantur.

(printed under page 314)

(12) ‹anchor: Refellendi› · col 602

Refellendi. In ms. Jun. haec sequentia, quae in impressis non extant, habentur: Volens aliud esse jus civile, aliud naturale: civile jus dici civilem sapientiam et naturale sine sapientia fieri, ac si utrumque nullum foret. Quam sententiam in textum admittere non placuit; in nullo enim alio ms. expressa deprehenditur. GALLAEUS. Vide Ciceronem, lib. III de Officiis.

Of refuting. In the Junius manuscript the following, which is not found in the printed editions, is had: "Wishing civil law to be one thing and natural law another: that civil law is called civil wisdom, and natural law comes about without wisdom, as if both were nothing." I did not choose to admit this sentence into the text, for it is found written in no other manuscript. GALLAEUS. See Cicero, On Duties book III.

(printed under page 314)

(13) ‹anchor: Qui totius orbis potirentur› · col 602

Qui totius orbis potirentur. Sic omnes fere mss. et editi. Et recte; hoc enim verbum etiam gaudet genitivo apud Ciceronem IV Acad., 126, et I Finib., 7; apud Velleium Paterculum, regni potiri; apud Caesarem, totius Galliae sese potiri posse sperant; et potiri hostium, apud Plautum. Nonnulli ignorantes addiderunt, dominio, ut in mss Jun. et 2 Reg. rec. et 2 vet. edit. Rom., sed admodum frustra, siquidem mox praecessit imperio. Romanis ipsis injustitias exprobrant S. Augustinus in libris de Civitate Dei, et Tertullianus, cap. 25 Apologetici.

Who were masters of the whole world. So nearly all manuscripts and editions. And rightly; for this verb also takes the genitive, in Cicero, Academica IV, 126, and On Ends I, 7; in Velleius Paterculus, "to gain the kingdom"; in Caesar, "they hope they can make themselves masters of all Gaul"; and "to get the enemy into one's power," in Plautus. Some, not knowing this, added dominio, as in the Junius manuscript and 2 recent Royal and 2 old Rome editions, but quite vainly, since imperio had just preceded. St Augustine in the books of the City of God, and Tertullian, Apology ch. 25, reproach the Romans themselves with their injustices.

(printed under page 314)

(14) ‹anchor: Et in egestate› · col 602

Et in egestate. Ita restitui ex mss. 1 Bonon. et 1 Reg. antiquissimis, 3 al. Reg., 1 Colbert., 1 Lips., Goth., Brun., edit. Is. et ipsomet Lactantio Epitom. cap. 56: Quod si omnes populi penes quos sit imperium, ipsique Romani, qui orbem totum possederint, justitiam sequi velint, ac suum cuique restituere quod vi et armis occupaverunt, ad casas et egestatem revertentur. Mss. Cauc. et 15 rec. habent in necessitate. Quatuor illa verba desunt in Regio-Put.

And in want. So I have restored from the very old manuscripts 1 Bologna and 1 Royal, 3 other Royal, 1 Colbert, 1 Leipzig, Gotha, Brun., Isaeus's edition, and Lactantius himself, Epitome ch. 56: "But if all the peoples who hold power, and the Romans themselves, who possessed the whole world, should wish to follow justice and restore to each his own what they seized by force and arms, they will return to huts and want." The Cauc. manuscript and 15 recent have in necessitate. Those four words are missing in Regio-Puteanus.

(printed under page 314)

(15) ‹anchor: Si profitebitur, bonus quidem, quia› · col 602

Si profitebitur, bonus quidem, quia. Mss. rec. 5 Colbert., 2 Clarom. et 10 edit. ferunt: Si profitebitur, emptori fugitivum esse, bonus quidem. At tria haec verba, quae interponunt, a caeteris absunt. Ac ea eradenda esse recte docet Thomasius, quia haec non ad servum tantum fugitivum respiciunt, verum etiam ad domum pestilentem et similia referenda sunt,

If he declares it, he is indeed good, because. 5 recent Colbert manuscripts, 2 Clermont and 10 editions bear: "If he declares to the buyer that he is a runaway, he is indeed good." But these three words which they insert are absent from the rest. And Thomasius rightly teaches that they should be erased, because these things look not only to the runaway slave but are to be referred also to the plague-ridden house and the like.

<!-- The note ends with a comma as printed; no continuation appears at the head of page 315's foot. --> (printed under page 314)

Page

  • running head: 601 LIBER V. DE JUSTI[TIA] (cut off at right edge of image)
  • marginal letters: A ad opera justitiae. Et qui pauperes; B tibus contraria sunt ista universa terrena; C buerit, hic apud Deum praecellens; D in the Variorum Notae, between "quibusdam editis." and "Semotius."
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with "ad"; last word "habea-" split at column break (habeatur); "praecipue" read through worn type (prints like "prrecipne"), taken as damaged type, not misprint; "praebuerit" second half worn (looks like "bucrit"), taken as damaged type; heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" and the notes below it belong to the foot apparatus and are not set; no editors' matter in the text block
PL 6:602
Nec enim falsa est illa sententia, quae apud Euripidem fertur in hunc modum: Quae hic mala putantur, haec sunt in coelo bona.
For that saying is not false which is reported in Euripides in this manner: The things that are thought evils here, these are goods in heaven.
CAPUT XVII.
Chapter XVII.
De Christianorum aequitate, sapientia et stultitia.
On the equity, wisdom and folly of Christians.
Exposui causam cur philosophi nec invenire justitiam, nec defendere potuerunt. Nunc redeo ad id quod intenderam. Carneades ergo, quoniam erant infirma quae a philosophis afferebantur, sumpsit audaciam refellendi, quia refelli posse intellexit. Ejus disputationis summa haec fuit: « Jura sibi homines pro utilitate sanxisse, scilicet varia pro moribus; et apud eosdem pro temporibus saepe mutata: jus autem naturale esse nullum: Omnes et homines, et alias animantes ad utilitates suas natura ducente ferri; proinde aut nullam esse justitiam, aut si sit aliqua, summam esse stultitiam, quoniam sibi noceret alienis commodis consulens. » Et inferebat haec argumenta: « Omnibus populis qui florerent imperio, et Romanis quoque ipsis, qui totius orbis potirentur, si justi velint esse, hoc est, si aliena restituant, ad casas esse redeundum, et in egestate ac miseriis jacendum. » Tum omissis communibus ad propria veniebat. « Bonus vir, inquit, si habeat servum fugitivum, vel domum insalubrem ac pestilentem, quae vitia solus sciat, et ideo proscribat ut vendat, utrumne profitebitur fugitivum servum ac pestilentem domum se vendere, an celabit emptorem? Si profitebitur, bonus
I have set out the reason why the philosophers were able neither to find justice nor to defend it. Now I return to what I had intended. Carneades therefore, since the things put forward by the philosophers were weak, took up the boldness of refuting them, because he understood that they could be refuted. The sum of his disputation was this: « That men had sanctioned laws for themselves for the sake of advantage, namely differing according to customs, and among the same people often changed according to the times; but that natural law is nothing: that both all men and the other living creatures are carried towards their own advantages under the guidance of nature; accordingly that either there is no justice, or, if there is any, it is the greatest folly, since one would harm oneself in consulting the interests of others. » And he brought forward these arguments: « That all peoples who flourished in dominion, and the Romans themselves too, who were masters of the whole world, if they wished to be just, that is, if they were to restore what belongs to others, would have to return to huts and lie in want and miseries. » Then, leaving aside general matters, he came to particular ones. « A good man, he says, if he has a runaway slave, or an unhealthy and pestilential house, whose defects he alone knows, and therefore advertises it in order to sell it, will he declare that he is selling a runaway slave and a pestilential house, or will he conceal it from the buyer? If he declares it, he [will be] good
Editors' notes and page, col. 602

Page

  • running head: R V. DE JUSTITIA. 602 (left part cut off at image edge; presumably LIBER V.; final digit of column number oddly formed)
  • marginal letters: A ‹tur. Nec enim falsa›; B ‹naturale esse nullum›; C ‹vendere, an celabit emptorem›; D ‹Rom., sed admodum frustra› (D stands in the Variorum notae at the page foot, not in the text block)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "tur." of a word broken from column 601 (left untranslated in English); column ends with "bo-" (bonus) broken at the column break; VARIORUM NOTAE at page foot not set (later pass); left-edge fragments belong to col. 601 and are not set
PL 6:603
quidem, quia non fallet: sed tamen stultus judicabitur, quia vel parvo vendet, vel omnino non vendet. Si celaverit, erit quidem sapiens, quia rei consulet: sed idem malus, quia fallet. Rursus, si reperiat aliquem, qui aurichalcum se putet vendere, cum sit illud aurum, aut plumbum, cum sit argentum: taeebitne, ut id parvo emat, an indicabit, ut magno? Stultum plane videtur, malle magno.» Unde intelligi volebat, et eum, qui sit justus ac bonus, stultum esse, et eum, qui sapiens, malum. Et tamen sine pernicie fieri posse, ut sint homines paupertate contenti. Transcendebat ergo ad majora, in quibus nemo posset sine periculo vitae justus esse. Dicebat enim: «Nempe justitia est, hominem non occidere, alienum prorsus non attingere. Quid ergo justus faciet, si forte naufragium fecerit, et aliquis imbecillior viribus tabulam ceperit? Nonne illum tabula deturbabit, ut ipse conscendat, eaque nixus evadat; maxime cum sit nullus medio mari testis? Si sapiens est, faciet; ipsi enim pereundum est, nisi fecerit. Si autem mori maluerit, quam manus inferre alteri, jam justus ille, sed stultus est, qui vitae suae non parcat, dum parcit alienae. Item, si acie suorum fusa, hostes insequi coeperint, et justus ille nactus fuerit aliquem saucium equo insidentem, eine parcet, ut ipse occidatur, an dejiciet ex equo, ut ipse possit hostem effugere? Quod si fecerit sapiens, sed idem malus; si non fecerit, justus, sed idem stultus sit necesse est.» Ita ergo justitiam cum in duas partes divisisset, alteram civilem esse dicens, alteram naturalem, utramque subvertit; quod illa civilis, sapientia sit quidem, sed justitia non sit, naturalis autem illa, justitia sit quidem, sed non sit sapientia. Arguta haec plane ac venenata sunt, et quae
indeed, because he will not deceive; but nevertheless he will be judged a fool, because he will sell either cheaply or not at all. If he conceals [them], he will indeed be wise, because he will look after his property; but the same man [will be] bad, because he will deceive. Again, if he should find someone who thinks he is selling brass when it is gold, or lead when it is silver: will he keep silent, so as to buy it cheaply, or will he point it out, so as [to buy it] dearly? It plainly seems foolish to prefer [to buy] dearly. » From this he wished it to be understood both that he who is just and good is a fool, and that he who is wise is bad. And yet it can happen without ruin that men are content with poverty. He therefore passed on to greater matters, in which no one could be just without danger to his life. For he said: « Surely justice is not to kill a man, not to touch at all what belongs to another. What then will the just man do, if perhaps he has suffered shipwreck, and someone weaker in strength has seized a plank? Will he not push him off the plank, so that he himself may climb on and, supported by it, escape, especially since there is no witness in the middle of the sea? If he is wise, he will do it; for he himself must perish unless he does it. But if he prefers to die rather than lay hands on another, then that man is just, but he is a fool, who does not spare his own life while he spares another's. Likewise, if, when the battle line of his own side has been routed, the enemy have begun to pursue, and that just man has come upon some wounded man sitting on a horse, will he spare him, so that he himself is killed, or will he throw him down from the horse, so that he himself may escape the enemy? If he does this, he is wise, but at the same time bad; if he does not, he must be just, but at the same time a fool. » So then, having divided justice into two parts, saying that one is civil and the other natural, he overturned both; because the civil kind is indeed wisdom, but is not justice, while the natural kind is indeed justice, but is not wisdom. These things are plainly subtle and poisonous, and which
Editors' notes and page, col. 603

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 315)

(1) ‹anchor: Non fallet› · col 603

Non fallet. Mss. 11, et edit. Rom. 1468, non fallit. Sed fallet exposcunt sequentia, consulet, fallet.

He will not deceive. 11 manuscripts and the Rome edition of 1468, non fallit. But what follows, consulet, fallet, demands fallet.

(printed under page 315)

(2) ‹anchor: Rei consulet› · col 603

Rei consulet. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. et ed. Is. sibi consulet.

He will look to his interest. 1 old Bologna manuscript and Isaeus's edition, sibi consulet (will look to himself).

(printed under page 315)

(3) ‹anchor: Quia fallet› · col 603

Quia fallet. Mss. 5 rec., quia fallit.

Because he will deceive. 5 recent manuscripts, quia fallit.

(printed under page 315)

(4) ‹anchor: An indicabit?› · col 603

An indicabit? Mss. Cauc. Jun. et 9 edit. an id indicabit?

Or will he disclose? The Cauc. and Junius manuscripts and 9 editions, an id indicabit?

(printed under page 315)

(5) ‹anchor: Transcendebat› · col 603

Transcendebat. Ita mss. antiquiores et potiores maximo numero, cum editis multis. Scripti 10 et typis excusi 5, transibat.

Was going beyond. So the older and better manuscripts in very great number, with many editions. 10 manuscripts and 5 printed, transibat.

(printed under page 315)

(6) ‹anchor: Posset› · col 603

Posset. Mss. 1 Bon. et 4 rec. totidemque editi, potest; 1 Clarom. possit.

Could. 1 Bologna manuscript and 4 recent, and as many editions, potest; 1 Clermont, possit.

(printed under page 315)

(7) ‹anchor: Jam justus ille› · col 603

Jam justus ille. Hanc lectionem unius ms. Reg. et edit. Ald., Florent., Juntar., Paris. 1525., Crat., Gymnic., Graph., Fasit., Betul., Gall., Spark., Walch., retinui, quantumvis invitis et reclamantibus tum mss. tum impressis codicibus, ubi habetur, jam non justus ille, exceptis 1 Reg. rec., 1 Colb. et Brun. qui referunt, jam non sapiens ille. Nostra lectio maxime convenit sententiae Carneadis: adversativa vero omnino repugnat; non enim in hac disputatione injustitia, sed justitia cum stultitia, injustitia vero cum ipsa sapientia conjungebatur: et ita dicebatur, quod ille quidem justus erit, sed stultus; si vero contra fecerit, idem sapiens habebitur, sed erit injustus. Hoc liquet ex alio sequenti exemplo. ISAEUS. — At Heumannus putat esse legendum, jam vero justus, ut in antiquis editis. — Jam vero justus ille, sed stultus est. Praetuli istam lectionem, quia altera, jam non justus ille, repugnat sententiae Carneadis, integro Lactantii capiti 17 maxime infra, et verbis Epitomes, cap. 56: (continued on col 604) Utrumne.... tabula.... equo deturbabit, ut ipse possit evadere? Si volet justus esse, non faciet; sed idem stultus judicabitur, qui dum alterius vitae parcit, suam prodit. Si faciet, sapiens quidem... sed... malus. BUN.

Then he is just. I have kept this reading of one Royal manuscript and of the editions of Aldus, Florence, the Juntas, Paris 1525, Cratander, Gymnicus, Gryphius, Fasitelius, Betuleius, Gallaeus, Sparke, Walch, however much the manuscript and printed codices resist and protest, in which one has jam non justus ille (then he is not just), except 1 recent Royal, 1 Colbert and Brun., which give jam non sapiens ille (then he is not wise). Our reading suits Carneades's view best; the adversative one is wholly at odds with it. For in this debate it was not injustice but justice that was joined with folly, and injustice with wisdom itself: and so it was said that the man will indeed be just, but foolish; but if he does the opposite, the same man will be held wise, but will be unjust. This is clear from another example that follows. ISAEUS. — But Heumann thinks one should read jam vero justus, as in the old editions. — Then indeed he is just, but foolish. I have preferred this reading because the other, jam non justus ille, conflicts with Carneades's view, with the whole of Lactantius's ch. 17 below especially, and with the words of the Epitome, ch. 56: "Will he push... from the plank... from the horse, so that he himself can escape? If he wishes to be just, he will not do it; but the same man will be judged foolish, who, while he spares another's life, betrays his own. If he does it, he is wise indeed... but... wicked." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 315)

(8) ‹anchor: Dum parcit alienae› · col 604

Dum parcit alienae. Receptam firmant c. 17: Stultitia est alienae animae parcere, cum pernicie suae; et verba paulo ante ex epit. c. 56 citata. BUN.

While he spares another's. The received reading is confirmed by ch. 17: "It is folly to spare another's life to the ruin of one's own"; and by the words of the Epitome, ch. 56, cited a little above. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 315)

(9) ‹anchor: Venenata› · col 604

Venenata. Heumannus suspicatur Lactantium scripsisse pene invicta. Nihil contra libros muto: quia haec argumenta aculeata, perniciosa et gravia erant, illa vocat venenata. Sic Ciceronis orationes contra Antonium, lib. III, c. 14 vocavit venenatas. BUN.

Poisoned. Heumann suspects Lactantius wrote pene invicta (almost unconquerable). I change nothing against the books: because these arguments were stinging, pernicious and weighty, he calls them poisoned. So he called Cicero's speeches against Antony poisoned, book III, ch. 14. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 315)

(10) ‹anchor: Non potuerit refellere› · col 604

Non potuerit refellere. Ita omnes manu exarati et impressi, praeter 4 mss. rec. et 3 edit., in quibus est potuit.

Could not refute. So all the handwritten and printed codices, except 4 recent manuscripts and 3 editions, in which is potuit.

(printed under page 315)

(11) ‹anchor: Faciat.... respondentem› · col 604

Faciat.... respondentem. Eleganter, ut lib. I, c. 10: Facit assidentem. Cic. lib. I de Nat. Deor., cap. 12, Facit Socratem disputantem. Conf. lib. I de Natura Deorum, cap. 8. BUN.

Makes... answering. Elegantly, as in book I, ch. 10: "He makes him sitting by." Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods book I, ch. 12: "He makes Socrates arguing." Compare On the Nature of the Gods book I, ch. 8. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 315)

(12) ‹anchor: Pro justitiaque› · col 604

Pro justitiaque. Ita alibi Lactantius; et sic lego cum 3 editis omnibusque mss., exceptis 2 Reg. rec. et cunctis fere editis in quibus est, proque justitia.

And for justice. So Lactantius elsewhere; and so I read with 3 editions and all the manuscripts, except 2 recent Royal and nearly all the editions, in which is proque justitia.

(printed under page 315)

(13) ‹anchor: Irrefutata› · col 604

Irrefutata. Pro non refutata, est nova vox.

Unrefuted. For non refutata; it is a new word.

(printed under page 315)

(14) ‹anchor: Qui profecto licet sapiens fuerit› · col 604

Qui profecto licet sapiens fuerit. Hujus sapientia celebratur a Cicerone libro de Finibus secundo, de Offic. II, et praecipue de Amicitia, quae Laelii nomine inscribitur. BETUL.

Who indeed, though he was wise. His wisdom is celebrated by Cicero in On Ends book II, On Duties II, and especially in On Friendship, which bears the title of Laelius. BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 315)

(15) ‹anchor: Qui› · col 604

Qui. Heuman. legit quia, ex editis.

Who. Heumann reads quia (because), from the editions.

(printed under page 315)

(16) ‹anchor: Plato› · col 604

Plato. Cujus libri decem de Republica, de Justitia, inscripti sunt.

Plato. Whose ten books of the Republic are entitled On Justice.

(printed under page 315)

(17) ‹anchor: Aristoteles› · col 604

Aristoteles. Libro V Moralium.

Aristotle. In book V of the Ethics.

(printed under page 315)

Page

  • running head: 603 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A nus quidem, quia non fallet; B cerit, et aliquis imbecillior viribus; C vilis, sapientia sit quidem; D (none in this column's text block; D stands in the notes area beside the right-hand column)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "nus" of a word broken from the previous column (presumably bonus); "taeebitne" read as printed with e for c, slightly UNSURE at this resolution; the VARIORUM NOTAE at the page foot not set (later pass); right-hand column (604) cut off and not set
PL 6:604
Marcus Tullius non potuerit refellere. Nam cum faciat Laelium Furio respondentem, pro justitiaque dicentem, irrefutata haec tanquam foveam praetergressus est; ut videatur idem Laelius non naturalem, quae in crimen stultitiae venerat, sed illam civilem defendisse justitiam, quam Furius sapientiam quidem esse concesserat, sed injustam.
Marcus Tullius could not refute. For although he makes Laelius reply to Furius and speak on behalf of justice, he passed over these [arguments] unrefuted, as one passes a pit; so that the same Laelius seems to have defended not natural justice, which had come under the charge of folly, but that civil justice which Furius had granted to be wisdom indeed, but unjust.
CAPUT XVIII.
Chapter XVIII.
De justitia, sapientia et stultitia.
On justice, wisdom and folly.
Quod ad praesentem disputationem pertinebat, ostendi quomodo justitia similitudinem stultitiae gerat; ut appareat non sine causa decipi eos, qui putant, nostrae religionis homines stultos esse, qui talia facere videantur, qualia ille proposuit. Nunc majus a me exigi sentio; ut ostendam, quare justitiam Deus stultitiae specie convolutam, ex oculis hominum voluerit auferre, si prius Furio respondero, quia parum plene respondit Laelius: qui profecto licet sapiens fuerit, ut vocabatur, patrocinari tamen verae justitiae nullo modo poterat, qui caput ipsum fontemque justitiae non tenebat. Nobis autem facilior est ista defensio, quibus coelesti beneficio familiaris est ac penitus nota justitia, quique illam non nomine, sed re, novimus. Nam Plato et Aristoteles honesta quidem voluntate justitiam defendere cupierunt, effecissentque aliquid, si conatus eorum bonos, si eloquentiam, si virtutem ingenii, divinarum quoque rerum doctrina juvisset. Itaque opus illorum inane atque inutile jacuit; nec cuiquam hominum persuadere potuerunt, ut eorum praescripto viveret, quia fundamentum a coelo disciplina illa non habuit. Nostrum
So far as concerned the present discussion, I have shown how justice bears a likeness to folly, so that it may be apparent that not without cause are those deceived who think that the men of our religion are fools, since they seem to do such things as he put forward. Now I sense that something greater is required of me: that I show why God willed to remove from the eyes of men justice wrapped in the appearance of folly, once I have first replied to Furius, since Laelius replied too incompletely: for although he was certainly wise, as he was called, he could nevertheless in no way champion true justice, since he did not hold the very head and source of justice. But this defence is easier for us, to whom by heavenly favour justice is familiar and thoroughly known, and who know it not in name but in reality. For Plato and Aristotle with honourable intent indeed desired to defend justice, and they would have accomplished something if knowledge of divine things as well had aided their good efforts, their eloquence, their strength of intellect. Accordingly their work lay empty and useless; nor were they able to persuade any man to live by their precept, because that teaching had no foundation from heaven. Our
Editors' notes and page, col. 604

Page

  • running head: ACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 604 (cut off at left edge; column number printed with an indistinct final figure)
  • marginal letters: A Marcus Tullius non potuerit; B cere videantur, qualia; C inutile jacuit; D beside the notes, nium, lib. III, c. 14
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: CAPUT XVIII. and its italic sub-caption are printed centred on lines of their own, so they are set as separate lines; a stray mark before "ut vocabatur" is ignored; the VARIORUM NOTAE heading and the notes at the page foot are left for the later pass
PL 6:605
opus certius sit necesse est, quos Deus docuit. Illi enim depingebant verbis, et imaginabantur justitiam, quae in conspectu non erat; nec praesentibus exemplis confirmare poterant, quae afferebant. Responderi enim posset ab audientibus, non posse ita vivi, sicut illi sua disputatione praescriberent; adeo ut nulli adhuc extiterint, qui id genus vitae sequerentur. Nos autem non verbis modo, sed etiam exemplis ex vero petitis, vera esse quae a nobis dicuntur ostendimus. Sensit igitur Carneades, quae sit natura justitiae, nisi quod parum alte perspexit, stultitiam non esse: quanquam intelligere mihi videor, qua mente id fecerit. Non enim vere existimavit eum stultum esse, qui justus est: sed cum sciret non esse, et rationem tamen cur ita videretur, non comprehenderet, voluit ostendere latere in abdito veritatem, ut decretum disciplinae suae tueretur: cujus summa sententia est, Nihil percipi posse.
work, since God has taught us, must necessarily be more certain. For they painted justice in words and imagined it, though it was not in view; nor could they confirm by present examples the things which they put forward. For it could have been answered by their hearers that it is not possible to live in the way that they prescribed in their disputation; so much so that none have yet arisen who followed that kind of life. We, however, show that the things said by us are true not only by words but also by examples drawn from reality. Carneades therefore perceived what the nature of justice is, except that he did not look deeply enough to see that it is not folly: although I think I understand with what intent he did this. For he did not truly think that the one who is just is a fool; but since he knew that he is not, and yet did not grasp the reason why he seemed so, he wished to show that the truth lies hidden in concealment, so as to defend the tenet of his school, whose chief doctrine is: Nothing can be perceived.
Videamus ergo, utrumne justitia foedus aliquod habere cum stultitia possit. Justus, inquit, si aut equum saucio, aut tabulam naufrago non ademerit, ut ipse animam suam liberet, stultus est. Primum omnium, nego ullo modo fieri posse, ut homini, qui quidem vere justus sit, ejusmodi casus eveniat; quia justus neque cuiquam nato inimicus est, neque quidquam omnino appetit alienum. Cur enim naviget, aut quid petat ex aliena terra, cui sufficit sua? Cur autem belligeret, ac se alienis furoribus misceat, in cujus animo pax cum hominibus perpetua versetur? Scilicet peregrinis mercibus, aut humano sanguine delectabitur, qui nec lucrum sciat appetere, cui sufficit victus; et
Let us see, therefore, whether justice can have any alliance with folly. The just man, he says, if he does not take the horse from a wounded man or the plank from a shipwrecked man so as to save his own life, is a fool. First of all, I deny that it can in any way come about that such a case should befall a man who is truly just; because the just man is neither an enemy to anyone born, nor does he covet anything at all that belongs to another. For why should he sail, or what should he seek from a foreign land, when his own suffices him? And why should he wage war and mingle himself in the frenzies of others, when in his mind there dwells perpetual peace with men? No doubt he will take delight in foreign merchandise or in human blood, he who does not know how to covet gain, to whom his sustenance suffices; and
Editors' notes and page, col. 605

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 316)

(1) ‹anchor: Quos› · col 605

Quos. Ita quamplurimi et antiquissimi mss. et 4 editi. Caeteri cum 9 rec. scriptis, quod.

Whom. So very many and very old manuscripts and 4 editions. The rest, with 9 recent manuscripts, quod.

(printed under page 316)

(2) ‹anchor: Afferebant› · col 605

Afferebant. Sic restitui ex mss. 5 veterrimis, 1 Bonon., 2 Reg., 3 al. Reg., 2 Colbert., 2 Clarom. In scriptis 10 et 10 editis legitur asserebant; in aliis disserebant.

They brought forward. So I have restored from 5 very old manuscripts, 1 Bologna, 2 Royal, 3 other Royal, 2 Colbert, 2 Clermont. In 10 manuscripts and 10 editions one reads asserebant; in others disserebant.

(printed under page 316)

(3) ‹anchor: Perspexit› · col 605

Perspexit. Ita emendavi ex mss. 5 Reg. antiquioribus, 4 Colbert., 2 Clarom., Brun. et edit. Betul., faventibus Cauc., 1 Bonon. rec. et Tax. in quibus est perspexerit. 1 Bonon. antiq., 5 Reg. rec., 2 Colb. et 11 vulgati habent, prospexit.

He saw through. So I have corrected from 5 older Royal manuscripts, 4 Colbert, 2 Clermont, Brun., and Betuleius's edition, with the support of Cauc., 1 recent Bologna and Tax., in which is perspexerit. 1 old Bologna, 5 recent Royal, 2 Colbert and 11 common editions have prospexit.

(printed under page 316)

(4) ‹anchor: Et rationem tamen› · col 605

Et rationem tamen. Addidi tamen ex 10 editis cunctisque mss. praeter 1 Bon. antiq., Pen. et 4 edit. rec. quibus deest.

And yet the reason. I have added tamen from 10 editions and all the manuscripts except 1 old Bologna, Pen. and 4 recent editions, which lack it.

(printed under page 316)

(5) ‹anchor: Decretum disciplinae› · col 605

Decretum disciplinae. De talibus decretis multa Seneca in epist. 95. Arnob. l. II, p. 48: Qui (philosophi) dum alter alterius labefactant, destruunt, convelluntque decreta, cuncta incerta fecerunt. BUN.

The tenet of his school. On such tenets Seneca says much in letter 95. Arnobius, book II, p. 48: "They (the philosophers), while one shakes, destroys and tears up the tenets of another, have made everything uncertain." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 316)

(6) ‹anchor: Ut decretum disciplinae suae tueretur› · col 605

Ut decretum disciplinae suae tueretur. Academicae factionis scilicet, nihil certo sciri; sive ut sequitur, nihil percipi ut certum posse. Decretum autem dixit dogma institutum, ἀρεστόν. Partim ex BETULEIO.

That he might defend the tenet of his school. That of the Academic party, namely, "that nothing is known for certain"; or, as follows, "that nothing can be grasped" as certain. By decretum he meant an established doctrine, an ἀρεστόν. Partly from BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 316)

(7) ‹anchor: Cur enim naviget› · col 605

Cur enim naviget, etc. Sic etiam alii Patres negotiationem tanquam rem illicitam damnarunt. Vide Tertull., lib. de Idolol., c. XI. Eorum rationes erant quod illa vix possit exerceri sine cupiditate et mendacio. GALLAEUS.

For why should he sail, etc. So too other Fathers condemned trade as an unlawful thing. See Tertullian, On Idolatry, ch. XI. Their reasons were that it can hardly be carried on without greed and lying. GALLAEUS.

(printed under page 316)

(8) ‹anchor: Versetur› · col 605

Versetur. Francius, versatur. Vide praecedentia. 1 Reg. rec. versatur a secunda manu. Heuman. legit etiam versatur.

Should dwell. Franck, versatur. See what precedes. 1 recent Royal, versatur in the second hand. Heumann also reads versatur.

(printed under page 316)

(9) ‹anchor: Qui nec lucrum sciat appetere› · col 605

Qui nec lucrum sciat appetere, etc. Supra dixit, virum justum nihil quidquam appetere alieni, et hic nec lucrum, etc. Quae sic accipi non volo, quasi injustitiae sit arguendus qui lucrum appetit. Quod hic (continued on col 606) generaliter asserit auctor noster, sane de immodico appetitu intelligit, quo sensu ejus assertio vera est.

Who does not know how to seek gain, etc. Above he said that the just man seeks nothing whatever of another's, and here not even gain, etc. I do not want this taken as though one who seeks gain were to be convicted of injustice. What our author asserts here in general terms, he surely means of immoderate desire, in which sense his assertion is true.

(printed under page 316)

(10) ‹anchor: Spectare› · col 606

Spectare. Respicit ad leges christianorum, quibus fas non erat spectaculis gladiatoriis interesse.

To watch. He has in view the laws of the Christians, for whom it was not lawful to attend gladiatorial shows.

(printed under page 316)

(11) ‹anchor: Vel invitus ad haec subeunda cogatur› · col 606

Vel invitus ad haec subeunda cogatur. Nimirum ad caedem faciendam, dum militare cogitur; nam illo aevo, non solum sub imperatoribus gentilibus, sed etiam christianis, cum delectus tironum ageretur, quibus militaris aetas ac statura esset, et qui ejus erant conditionis, uti militiae vacationem non haberent, ad militare sacramentum adigebantur, nec illud defugere poterant. Qui semel autem id sacramentum dixissent, ante emensa stipendia, et nisi ex justa ac merita causa impetrata missione, discedere a signis non habuere fas: qui aliter militiam deseruisset, capite plectebatur. Ergo illi sunt, quos invitos ad militiam, id est trucidandorum hominum legitimam artem subeundam, ex necessitate legum cogi dixit Lactantius, et quos propterea excusandos, tam ipse insinuat quam Patres Concilii Nicen. Can. 12. SALMASIUS.

Or be compelled against his will to undergo these things. That is, to commit slaughter, while he is compelled to serve as a soldier; for in that age, not only under pagan emperors but under Christian ones too, when a levy of recruits was held, those of military age and stature, and those of a condition that gave them no exemption from service, were driven to the military oath and could not escape it. And those who had once taken that oath were not permitted to leave the standards before completing their service, unless discharge had been obtained for a just and deserved cause: whoever otherwise deserted the service was punished with death. These, then, are the ones whom Lactantius said were compelled against their will by the necessity of the laws to undertake military service, that is, the lawful art of killing men; and whom, for that reason, he himself hints are to be excused, as do the Fathers of the Council of Nicaea, canon 12. SALMASIUS.

(printed under page 316)

(12) ‹anchor: O Carneade› · col 606

O Carneade. Ita plures mss. et editi. 2 Reg. rec. et 2 Colb. o Carneades; Brun. tu Carneades; 1 Colbert. tu, o Carneades. — O Carneade. Sic mss. et editi, quod recte tuetur Heumannus, et illustrat ex Vossio lib. II Anal., c. 3 et c. 10. Defendit quoque Gronovius. O Socrate, vocandi casu, in fragment. Ciceronis ed. Verburg., p. 3956. BUN.

O Carneades. So most manuscripts and editions. 2 recent Royal and 2 Colbert, o Carneades; Brun., tu Carneades; 1 Colbert, tu, o Carneades. — O Carneade. So the manuscripts and editions, which Heumann rightly defends and illustrates from Vossius, Analogia book II, chs. 3 and 10. Gronovius defends it too. O Socrate, in the vocative case, in the fragments of Cicero, Verburg's edition, p. 3956. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 316)

(13) ‹anchor: Qui sacramentum hominis ignorant› · col 606

Qui sacramentum hominis ignorant. Id est, veram rationem et conditionem hominis. Supra lib. II, cap. 18: Quicumque igitur sacramentum hominis, rationemque naturae suae nititur obtinere. WALCH.

Who do not know the mystery of man. That is, the true nature and condition of man. Above, book II, ch. 18: "Whoever, then, strives to grasp the mystery of man and the nature of his being." WALCH.

(printed under page 316)

(14) ‹anchor: Integer› · col 606

Integer. Horat. I Carm., Od. 22.

Upright. Horace, Odes book I, ode 22.

(printed under page 316)

(15) ‹anchor: Lambit Hydaspes› · col 606

Lambit Hydaspes. Sic antiquiores et meliores mss. (continues)

The Hydaspes laps. So the older and better manuscripts (continues)

(printed under page 316)

Page

  • running head: 605 LIBER V. DE JUST (cut off at the image's right edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹opus certius sit necesse est›; B ‹ostendere latere in abdito veritatem›; C ‹qui nec lucrum sciat appetere›; D ‹in the Variorum notes, beside Decretum disciplinae›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the column ends mid-sentence with "et". "Nihil percipi posse" is printed in italics. The full-width heading VARIORUM NOT[AE] and the notes below it (Quos. Ita quamplurimi ...) are page-foot apparatus and are not set here. The right-hand column (606) is cut off and is not set. Margin letter D stands in the notes area.
PL 6:606
non modo ipse caedem ⟨f⟩acere, sed interesse facientibus, ac spectare ducat nefas. Sed omitto ista; quoniam fieri potest, ut vel invitus ad haec subeunda cogatur. Adeone ergo justitiam, o Furi, vel potius, o Carneade, cujus est illa omnis oratio, tam inanem, tam supervacuam, tamque contemptam Deo putas, ut nihil possit, nihilque habeat in sese, quod ad custodiam sui valeat? Sed videlicet qui sacramentum hominis ignorant, ideoque ad hanc vitam temporalem referunt omnia, quanta sit vis justitiae, scire non possunt. Nam et cum de virtute disputant, quamvis intelligant aerumnis ac miseriis esse plenissimam, tamen expetendam esse aiunt sua causa; ejus enim praemia, quae sunt aeterna et immortalia, nullo modo vident. Sic rebus omnibus ad hanc praesentem vitam relatis, virtutem plane ad stultitiam redigunt; siquidem tantos hujus vitae labores frustra et inaniter suscipit. Sed haec alio loco plenius.
not only to commit slaughter himself, but to be present with those who commit it and to watch it, holds to be wicked. But I pass over these things, since it can happen that he is compelled even against his will to undergo them. Do you then, O Furius, or rather, O Carneades, whose whole speech that is, think justice so empty, so superfluous and so despised by God, that it has no power, and has nothing in itself which avails for its own protection? But plainly those who do not know the mystery of man, and therefore refer all things to this temporal life, cannot know how great is the power of justice. For even when they discuss virtue, although they understand that it is most full of hardships and miseries, they nevertheless say that it is to be sought for its own sake; for its rewards, which are eternal and immortal, they in no way see. Thus, having referred all things to this present life, they reduce virtue plainly to folly, since it undertakes such great labours of this life in vain and to no purpose. But of these things more fully in another place.
Interim de justitia, ut coepimus, cujus tanta vis est, ut cum oculos in coelum sustulerit, a Deo mereatur omnia. Recte igitur Flaccus tantam esse dixit innocentiae vim, ut ad tutelam sui non egeat nec armis, nec viribus, quacumque iter fecerit;
Meanwhile [let us speak] of justice, as we began, whose power is so great that, when it has raised its eyes to heaven, it obtains all things from God. Rightly therefore did Flaccus say that the power of innocence is so great that for its own protection it needs neither arms nor strength, wherever it has made its way:
Integer vitae sceleris atque purus, / Non eget Mauri jaculis, nec arcu, / Nec venenatis gravida sagittis, / Fusce, pharetra: / Sive per Syrtes iter aestuosas, / Sive facturus per inhospitalem / Caucasum, vel quae loca fabulosus / Lambit Hydaspes.
The man whole of life and pure of crime / needs not the javelins of the Moor, nor bow, / nor quiver heavy with poisoned arrows, / Fuscus: / whether he is about to make his way through the sweltering Syrtes, / or through the inhospitable / Caucasus, or the places which the storied / Hydaspes laps.
Non potest ergo fieri, quin hominem justum inter discrimina tempestatum atque bellorum coelestis tutela
It cannot therefore happen but that the just man, amid the perils of storms and of wars, heavenly protection
Editors' notes and page, col. 606

Page

  • running head: [LIB]ER V. DE JUSTITIA. 606 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A non modo ipse caedem; B relatis, virtutem plane; C discrimina tempestatum; D beside the Variorum notae (non habuere fas), not in the text block
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: first letter of facere damaged (looks like I/T), set ⟨f⟩acere; Horace verses printed as one unbroken block of eight lines, set as one paragraph with " / " for line breaks; last word tu- split at the column break (tutelam?); heading VARIORUM NOTAE and the notes below it (Salmasius, Bun., Walch) not set, left for later pass
PL 6:607
custodiat; ac non, etiamsi cum parricidis et nocentibus naviget, aut malis quoque parcatur, ut una justa et innocens anima liberetur, aut certe pereuntibus caeteris sola servetur. Sed concedamus posse fieri, quod proponit philosophus; quid ergo justus faciet, si nactus fuerit aut in equo saucium, aut in tabula naufragum? Non invitus confiteor, morietur potius, quam occidet. Nec ideo tamen justitia, quod est singulare hominis bonum, stultitiae nomen accipiet. Quid enim melius, quid carius esse homini debet, quam innocentia? quae utique tanto perfectior sit necesse est, quanto illam perduxeris ad extremum, morique malueris, ne quid de innocentiae ratione minuatur. Stultitia est, inquit, alienae animae parcere cum pernicie suae. Num etiam pro amicitia perire, stultum judicabis?
guards; and [would it] not [be that], even if he should sail with parricides and guilty men, either the wicked too are spared, so that one just and innocent soul may be set free, or at least, while the rest perish, it alone is preserved? But let us grant that what the philosopher proposes can happen: what then will the just man do, if he comes upon a wounded man on a horse, or a shipwrecked man on a plank? I confess, not unwillingly, he will die rather than kill. Nor yet on that account will justice, which is the singular good of man, receive the name of folly. For what ought to be better, what dearer to man than innocence? And it must surely be the more perfect, the further you carry it to the extreme, and the more you prefer to die rather than that anything be taken away from the principle of innocence. It is folly, he says, to spare another's life to the ruin of one's own. Will you also judge it foolish to perish for friendship?
Quid ergo illi familiares Pythagoraei laudantur a vobis, quorum alter se tyranno vadem mortis pro altero dedit, alter ad praestitutum tempus, cum jam sponsor ejus duceretur, praesentiam sui fecit, eumque interventu suo liberavit? quorum virtus in tanta gloria non haberetur, quod alter pro amico, alter etiam pro fide mori voluit, si stulti putarentur. Denique ob hanc ipsam virtutem tyrannus his gratiam retulit, utrumque servando, et hominis crudelissimi natura mutata est. Quin etiam deprecatus esse dicitur, ut se tertium in amicitiam reciperent, non utique tanquam stultos, sed tanquam bonos et sapientes viros. Itaque non video, quare cum pro amicitia et fide mori, summa gloria computetur, non etiam pro innocentia perire, sit homini gloriosum. Ergo stultissimi sunt, qui nobis crimini dant, mori velle pro Deo, cum ipsi eum, qui pro homine mori voluit, in coelum summis laudibus tollant. Denique ut concludam disputationem, non posse eumdem justum esse, ac stultum, eumdem sapientem, et injustum, docet ipsa ratio. Qui enim stultus est, quid sit justum
Why then are those Pythagorean friends praised by you, of whom one gave himself to the tyrant as surety of death for the other, and the other, at the appointed time, when his sponsor was already being led off, presented himself and freed him by his intervention? Their virtue would not be held in such great glory, in that the one was willing to die for a friend, the other even for good faith, if they were thought fools. In short, on account of this very virtue the tyrant showed them his gratitude by sparing both, and the nature of a most cruel man was changed. Indeed, he is even said to have begged that they would receive him as a third into their friendship, surely not as fools, but as good and wise men. And so I do not see why, when to die for friendship and good faith is reckoned the highest glory, to perish for innocence should not also be glorious for a man. Therefore they are most foolish who charge it against us as a crime that we are willing to die for God, when they themselves raise to heaven with the highest praises him who was willing to die for a man. Finally, to conclude the discussion, reason itself teaches that the same man cannot be just and foolish, nor the same man wise and unjust. For he who is foolish, what is just
Editors' notes and page, col. 607

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 317)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page)› · col 607

(continued) et 12 edit. ac libri Horatiani. Scripti 16 rec. Lactantiani et 3 vet. edit. Rom. Ambit, nec male.

(printed under page 317)

(2) ‹anchor: In tabula naufragum› · col 607

In tabula naufragum, etc. Idem habet et sentit cum Lactantio Ambrosius lib. III, offic. cap. 4.

A shipwrecked man on a plank, etc. Ambrose has the same and agrees with Lactantius, On Duties book III, ch. 4.

(printed under page 317)

(3) ‹anchor: Quid carius› · col 607

Quid carius. Mss. 12 rec. et 3 edit. clarius.

What dearer. 12 recent manuscripts and 3 editions, clarius (more glorious).

(printed under page 317)

(4) ‹anchor: Perduxeris› · col 607

Perduxeris. Mss. 6 rec., perduxerit, non male.

You have brought. 6 recent manuscripts, perduxerit, not badly.

(printed under page 317)

(5) ‹anchor: Judicabis› · col 607

Judicabis. Mss. 10 rec. et 13 edit. judicabitur, 2 Colbert. et Pen. judicabit. At scribo judicabis cum 1 Bonon. et 1 Reg. antiquissimis, 1 al. Reg. bonae notae, ac quinque aliis et edit. Betul. Vide praecedentia.

Will you judge. 10 recent manuscripts and 13 editions, judicabitur; 2 Colbert and Pen., judicabit. But I write judicabis with the very old 1 Bologna and 1 Royal, 1 other Royal of good repute, and five others, and Betuleius's edition. See what precedes.

(printed under page 317)

(6) ‹anchor: Pythagoraei› · col 607

Pythagoraei. Mss. rec. 2 Reg. et 1 Clarom. a secunda manu, edit. Rom. 1470, et Florentina, Pythagorici: Damon scilicet ac Pythias, de quibus Valerius lib. IV, cap. 7; Cicer. lib. III Officior. cap. 10.

Pythagoreans. 2 recent Royal manuscripts and 1 Clermont in the second hand, the Rome edition of 1470, and the Florentine, Pythagorici: namely Damon and Pythias, of whom Valerius, book IV, ch. 7; Cicero, On Duties book III, ch. 10.

(printed under page 317)

(7) ‹anchor: Tyranno› · col 607

Tyranno. Scilicet Dionysio Syracusano.

The tyrant. That is, Dionysius of Syracuse.

(printed under page 317)

(8) ‹anchor: Duceretur› · col 607

Duceretur. Scil. ad supplicium. Absolute, more veterum. Sic ter Seneca de Pisone, qui militem duci jusserat, de Ira lib. I, cap. 16. BUN.

Was being led. That is, to execution. Used absolutely, in the manner of the ancients. So three times Seneca, of Piso, who had ordered a soldier to be led off, On Anger book I, ch. 16. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 317)

(9) ‹anchor: Quod alter› · col 607

Quod alter. Antiquiorum et meliorum mss. est. In 4 rec. et 4 edit. est quorum alter; in 13 rec. et vulgatis 5 est cum alter.

Because the one. This is the reading of the older and better manuscripts. In 4 recent and 4 editions is quorum alter; in 13 recent and 5 common editions is cum alter.

(printed under page 317)

(10) ‹anchor: His› · col 607

His. Ita restitui ex mss. et multis editis. In nonnullis est hic.

To them. So I have restored from the manuscripts and many editions. In some is hic.

(printed under page 317)

(11) ‹anchor: Deprecatus› · col 607

Deprecatus. Id est, precatus. Lib. VI, cap. 20: Misericordiam deprecantes. Conf. lib. de Mort. persec. c. 41, cap. 46, cap 52, et Val. Max. lib. IV, cap. 7. (continued on col 608) Saepe hoc sensu Veteres. BUN.

Having entreated. That is, having prayed. Book VI, ch. 20: "entreating mercy." Compare On the Deaths of the Persecutors, chs. 41, 46, 52, and Valerius Maximus book IV, ch. 7. The ancients often use it in this sense. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 317)

(12) ‹anchor: Dissolvitur› · col 608

Dissolvitur. 1 Colb. dissolvetur; 1 Colb., 1 Lips., Em., solvitur.

Is resolved. 1 Colbert, dissolvetur; 1 Colbert, 1 Leipzig, Em., solvitur.

(printed under page 317)

(13) ‹anchor: Dum ne› · col 608

Dum ne. Ita antiq. et mel. mss. et edd. locutio Ciceroniana pro dummodo non recentiorum: Cic. ad Atticum lib. VI, cap. 1: dum ne negotiatori; et VIII, ep. 13, dum ne tibi, non laboro.

Provided not. So the old and better manuscripts and editions; a Ciceronian idiom for the dummodo non of the more recent: Cicero, To Atticus book VI, letter 1: "provided not to a trader"; and VIII, letter 13: "provided not to you, I do not mind."

(printed under page 317)

(14) ‹anchor: Conciliatricem› · col 608

Conciliatricem. Vide Cic. lib. I de Natura deorum, 104.

As one that commends. See Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods book I, 104.

(printed under page 317)

(15) ‹anchor: Quia malum est› · col 608

Quia malum est. Id est, quatenus malum est.

That it is evil. That is, inasmuch as it is evil.

(printed under page 317)

(16) ‹anchor: Nesciunt enim, quia malum est, nocere› · col 608

Nesciunt enim, quia malum est, nocere. Lactantius aliique scriptores sacri, Tertullianus, Augustinus, maxime Cyprianus vel sexcenties, ut vulgatam versionem omittam, post scio aliaque verba sentiendi, loco accusativi cum infinitivo, aut quod cum conjunctivo, eadem vi quia cum indicativo ponunt. Lactantius lib. VI, cap. 22: Scit enim, quia mortis est fabricatrix voluptas. Notamus ibidem plura, et ad lib. IV, cap. 12: Ut scias, quia ego sum Dominus. BUN.

For they do not know that to harm is evil. Lactantius and other sacred writers, Tertullian, Augustine, Cyprian above all, some six hundred times, to say nothing of the Vulgate, put quia with the indicative after scio and other verbs of perceiving, with the same force, in place of the accusative with infinitive or quod with the subjunctive. Lactantius, book VI, ch. 22: "For he knows that pleasure is the contriver of death." We note more there, and on book IV, ch. 12: "That you may know that I am the Lord." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 317)

(17) ‹anchor: Homo vero, qui› · col 608

Homo vero, qui. Ita mss. veterrimi 1 Bonon., 3 Reg. quorum unus est optimae notae, aliique sex ac totidem editi, tum etiam sex veteres editiones XV saeculi. In 12 mss. et 8 excusis est quia.

But man, who. So the very old manuscripts 1 Bologna, 3 Royal, one of them of the best repute, and six others and as many editions, and also six old editions of the fifteenth century. In 12 manuscripts and 8 printed is quia.

(printed under page 317)

(18) ‹anchor: Quo a mutis› · col 608

Quo a mutis. Mss. 3 rec. et 2 edit. multis.

By which from the dumb animals. 3 recent manuscripts and 2 editions, multis (many).

(printed under page 317)

(19) ‹anchor: Calliditas autem et astutia in mutis animalibus› · col 608

Calliditas autem et astutia in mutis animalibus. Ad- (continues)

But cunning and craft in dumb animals. [Ad-] (continues)

(printed under page 317)

Page

  • running head: 607 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN[...] (cut off at right edge)
  • marginal letters: A tela custodiat; ac non, etiamsi cum parricidis et no-; B pro amicitia perire, stultum judicabis?; C pro innocentia perire, sit homini gloriosum. Ergo; D beside the Variorum notae (Judicabis. Mss. 10 rec. ...), not in the text block
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "tela", probably the end of tu-tela broken from the preceding column, rendered "protection"; stray mark before "tabula" in line 7 ignored; worn type in the last lines makes "esse", "docet", "est" look like essc, docct, cst; set as e, taken as damaged type and not as misprints; column ends "jus-" (jus-tum?) split at the column break; first digit of the column number in the head is damaged and looks like 8; the heading VARIORUM NOT[...] is printed across both columns and cut off at the right edge, not set; it and the notes below it are the Variorum apparatus, left for the later pass; no editors' matter in the text block
PL 6:608
ac bonum nescit; et ideo semper peccat. Ducitur enim quasi captivus a vitiis; nec resistere ullo modo potest, quia caret virtute, quam nescit. Justus autem ab omni peccato se abstinet, quod aliter facere non potest, quam si habeat recti pravique notitiam.
and good he does not know; and therefore he always sins. For he is led as if a captive by vices; nor can he resist in any way, because he lacks virtue, which he does not know. But the just man abstains from every sin, which he cannot do otherwise than if he has knowledge of right and wrong.
Rectum autem discernere a pravo quis potest, nisi sapiens? Ita fit, ut numquam possit esse justus, qui stultus est, neque sapiens, qui fuerit injustus. Quod si est verissimum, manifestum est eum, qui aut naufrago tabulam, aut equum saucio non ademerit, stultum non esse; quia haec facere peccatum est, a quo se sapiens abstinet. Videri tamen et ipse confiteor, per hominum errorem ignorantium cujusque rei proprietatem. Itaque omnis haec quaestio non tam argumentis, quam definitione dissolvitur. Stultitia igitur est in factis dictisque, per ignorantiam recti ac boni, erratio. Ergo stultus non est, qui ne sibi quidem parcit, dum ne noceat alteri, quod est malum. Quod quidem nobis et ratio, et veritas ipsa praescribit. In omnibus enim videmus animalibus, quia sapientia carent, conciliatricem sui esse naturam. Nocent igitur aliis, ut sibi prosint; nesciunt enim quia malum est, nocere. Homo vero, qui scientiam boni ac mali habet, abstinet se a nocendo, etiam cum incommodo suo, quod animal irrationale facere non potest; et ideo inter summas hominis virtutes innocentia numeratur. Quibus rebus apparet sapientissimum esse, qui mavult perire ne noceat; ut id officium, quo a mutis discernitur, servet. Nam qui vendentis errorem non redarguit, ut aurum parvo emat, aut qui non profitetur fugitivum servum, vel pestilentem se domum vendere, lucro et commodo suo consulens, non est ille sapiens, ut Carneades videri volebat, sed callidus et astutus. Calliditas autem et astutia in mutis quoque animalibus sunt, vel cum insidiantur aliis et dolo capiunt ut devorent, vel cum insidias aliorum
But who can distinguish right from wrong, except the wise man? So it comes about that he who is a fool can never be just, nor he wise who has been unjust. And if this is most true, it is plain that he who has not taken the plank from a shipwrecked man, or the horse from a wounded man, is not a fool; because to do these things is a sin, from which the wise man abstains. Yet I myself admit that he seems [a fool], through the error of men who are ignorant of the proper nature of each thing. And so this whole question is resolved not so much by arguments as by definition. Folly, then, is a straying in deeds and words through ignorance of what is right and good. Therefore he is not a fool who does not spare even himself, provided that he does not harm another, which is evil. This indeed both reason and truth itself prescribe to us. For in all animals we see, because they lack wisdom, that nature is what wins them over to themselves. They harm others, therefore, that they may benefit themselves; for they do not know that to harm is evil. But man, who has knowledge of good and evil, abstains from harming, even to his own disadvantage, which an irrational animal cannot do; and therefore innocence is numbered among the highest virtues of man. From these things it is apparent that he is wisest who prefers to perish rather than to harm, so that he may keep that duty by which he is distinguished from the dumb animals. For he who does not point out a seller's error so as to buy gold for little, or he who does not declare that he is selling a runaway slave or a plague-ridden house, looking to his own gain and advantage, is not wise, as Carneades wished it to seem, but crafty and cunning. But craft and cunning are found in dumb animals too, both when they lie in wait for others and take them by guile in order to devour them, and when the snares of others
Editors' notes and page, col. 608

Page

  • running head: …CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 608 (left part of the running head cut off at the image edge; presumably LACTANTII)
  • marginal letters: A ‹tum ac bonum nescit›; B ‹mentis, quam definitione›; C ‹rem non redarguit›; D ‹beside the notes at the page foot, "Atticum lib. VI, cap. 1"›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "tum", the end of a word broken from col. 607 (evidently jus-tum), set as printed; the full-width line "…ARIORUM NOTAE." above the page-foot notes is cut off at the left edge and not set; Variorum notes at the page foot not set (later pass); "peccat" in the first line is faintly printed but legible; no editors' matter in the text block
PL 6:609
vario genere deludunt. Sapientia vero in hominem solum cadit. Sapientia est enim intelligentia vel ad bonum rectumque faciendum, vel ad abstinentiam dictorum factorumque improborum. Lucro autem nunquam sapiens studet, quia bona haec terrena contemnit; nec quemquam falli patitur, quia boni viri officium est, errores hominum corrigere, eosque in viam reducere. Siquidem socialis est hominis ac benefica natura, quo solo cognationem cum Deo habet.
are foiled by them in various ways. But wisdom falls to man alone. For wisdom is understanding, either for doing what is good and right, or for abstaining from wicked words and deeds. The wise man never pursues gain, because he despises these earthly goods; nor does he allow anyone to be deceived, because it is the duty of a good man to correct the errors of men and to lead them back onto the way. For the nature of man is social and beneficent, and by this alone he has kinship with God.
CAPUT XIX.
Chapter XIX.
De virtute, et Christianorum cruciatibus; ac de jure patris et domini.
On virtue, and the tortures of the Christians; and on the right of a father and of a master.
Sed nimirum haec causa efficit, ut stultus esse videatur, qui egere aut mori malit, quam noceat, vel eripiat aliquid alteri, quod hominem morte deleri putant. Ex qua persuasione omnes tum vulgi, tum etiam philosophorum nascuntur errores. Si enim post mortem nihil sumus, profecto stultissimi est hominis non huic vitae consulere, ut sit quam diutina et commodis omnibus plena. Quod qui faciet, a justitiae regula discedat necesse est. Si autem superest homini vita melior et longior, quod et philosophorum magnorum argumentis, et vatum responsis, et prophetarum divinis vocibus discimus; hanc praesentem cum suis bonis contemnere, sapientis est, cujus omnis jactura immortalitate pensatur. Apud Ciceronem idem ille justitiae defensor Laelius. « Vult, inquit, plane virtus honorem; nec est virtutis ulla alia merces. » Est plane, et quidem virtute dignissima, quam tu, Laeli, nunquam poteras suspicari; nihil enim divinarum noveras litterarum. Quam tamen illa, inquit, accipit facile, exigit non acerbe. Erras vehementer, si putas ab homine praemium solvi posse virtuti, cum ipse alio loco verissime dixeris: « Huic tu viro quas divitias
But doubtless this cause brings it about that he who would rather be in want or die than do harm or take something away from another seems to be a fool: that they think man is destroyed by death. From this conviction arise all the errors both of the common people and also of the philosophers. For if after death we are nothing, it is surely the mark of a most foolish man not to provide for this life, so that it may be as long as possible and full of all advantages. And whoever does this must necessarily depart from the rule of justice. But if there remains for man a better and longer life, which we learn both from the arguments of great philosophers and from the responses of the seers and from the divine voices of the prophets, then it is the part of a wise man to despise this present life with its goods, since all its loss is compensated by immortality. In Cicero that same defender of justice, Laelius [says]: "Virtue plainly wants honour; nor is there any other reward of virtue." There plainly is, and one most worthy of virtue, which you, Laelius, could never have suspected; for you knew nothing of the divine writings. "Which reward, however," he says, "she accepts readily, and does not demand harshly." You err greatly if you think that a reward can be paid to virtue by man, since you yourself said most truly in another place: "To this man, what riches
Editors' notes and page, col. 609

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 318)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page: Calliditas autem et astutia in mutis animalibus)› · col 609

(continued) didi autem ex 21 mss. Post mutis 8 scripti rec. et 14 excusi addunt quoque.

(printed under page 318)

(2) ‹anchor: Vel ad abstinentiam› · col 609

Vel ad abstinentiam. Sic reposui ex antiquissimis mss. 1 Bonon. et 2 Reg. edd. Tornes., Soubron., Is. Vide praeced. ad bonum. Quamplurimi scripti et impressi habent vel abstinentia.

Or towards abstinence. So I have restored from the very old manuscripts 1 Bologna and 2 Royal, and the editions of Tornaesius, Soubron, Isaeus. See the preceding ad bonum. Very many manuscripts and printed editions have vel abstinentia.

(printed under page 318)

(3) ‹anchor: Dictorum factorumque› · col 609

Dictorum factorumque. Haec lectio est quamplurimorum mss. inter quos sunt antiquissimi Reg. et Bonon. atque 11 editorum. Recte. Vide seq. Scripti 10 et 3 edit. vet. legunt delictorum factorumque.

Of words and deeds. This is the reading of very many manuscripts, among them the very old Royal and Bologna, and of 11 editions. Rightly. See the following. 10 manuscripts and 3 old editions read delictorum factorumque (of offences and deeds).

(printed under page 318)

(4) ‹anchor: Quo solo› · col 609

Quo solo. 4 mss. rec. et 7 edit. vet., qua sola; quae sola; Colb., quae solo. — Quo solo. Id est, qua re sola, scil. sapientia; quae vox quoniam fuit paulo remotior, usus est, ut et alibi, neutro, quod ad omnia de sapientia dicta referendum.

By which alone. 4 recent manuscripts and 7 old editions, qua sola; quae sola; Colbert, quae solo. — By which alone. That is, by which thing alone, namely wisdom; since that word stood a little too far back, he used, as elsewhere too, the neuter, which is to be referred to everything said about wisdom.

(printed under page 318)

(5) ‹anchor: Sed nimirum haec causa efficit› · col 609

Sed nimirum haec causa efficit, etc. Hactenus Furium confutavit, injustitiae patronum. Jam indicabit causas, cur Laelius, qui sapientissimus habebatur, justitiae partes non pro dignitate tueatur; nempe quod illius sapientia non coelitus fuit. Ostendit autem Laelium sibi contraria asserere. Ab initio vero capitis investigat errorum philosophicorum, atque vulgi scaturiginem; nempe quod articulus de spe resurrectionis non satis constater creditur. Ex his fundamentis colligit, quod Vivit apud superos, et habet sua munera virtus. (continued on col 610) Virtutem autem dicit ipsam justitiam, quae materia totius hujus quinti libri est.

But this cause, of course, brings it about, etc. So far he has refuted Furius, the advocate of injustice. Now he will show the reasons why Laelius, who was held to be very wise, does not defend the cause of justice as it deserves; namely, that his wisdom was not from heaven. He shows, moreover, that Laelius asserts things contrary to himself. From the beginning of the chapter he traces the source of the errors of the philosophers and of the crowd: namely, that the article of the hope of resurrection is not believed steadfastly enough. From these foundations he concludes that "Virtue lives among those above, and has its rewards." By virtue he means justice itself, which is the matter of this whole fifth book.

(printed under page 318)

(6) ‹anchor: Qui egere› · col 610

Qui egere. 1 Bonon. antiq. et 1 Clarom. a prima manu, quia.

Who... to be in want. 1 old Bologna and 1 Clermont in the first hand, quia.

(printed under page 318)

(7) ‹anchor: Ex qua persuasione› · col 610

Ex qua persuasione. Ms. Cant. et edit. 5, Ex eaque persuasione.

From which conviction. The Cambridge manuscript and 5 editions, Ex eaque persuasione.

(printed under page 318)

(8) ‹anchor: Hanc praesentem› · col 610

Hanc praesentem. Subaudi vitam, quod Goth. adscriptum habet, opinor, ex glossa receptum. CELL.

This present. Understand life, which the Gotha manuscript has written in, received, I think, from a gloss. CELLARIUS.

(printed under page 318)

(9) ‹anchor: Nunquam› · col 610

Nunquam. Ms. 1 Reg. rec. et 15 edit., nequaquam; in 1 Reg. rec. nunquam poteris.

Never. 1 recent Royal manuscript and 15 editions, nequaquam; in 1 recent Royal, nunquam poteris.

(printed under page 318)

(10) ‹anchor: Labantemque sententiam› · col 610

Labantemque sententiam. Scripti 7 et 2 edd. labentem; 1 Reg. rec. laborantemque.

And a tottering opinion. 7 manuscripts and 2 editions, labentem; 1 recent Royal, laborantemque.

(printed under page 318)

(11) ‹anchor: Effodiantur oculi› · col 610

Effodiantur oculi. Mss. 3 rec. et 12 editi interponunt ei, quod mox praecessit.

Let his eyes be dug out. 3 recent manuscripts and 12 editions insert ei, which has just preceded.

(printed under page 318)

(12) ‹anchor: Angustissimus trames› · col 610

Angustissimus trames. Ms. Brun. angustissimo tramite; 4 Colbert. angustissimos tramites, mendose. Scripti 6 rec. et 5 vulgati per angustissimos tramites. Lege de hoc infra lib. VI, cap. 3. — Angustissimus trames... perduceret. Nam unam tantum viam, unum tramitem ad immortalitatem ubique statuit; hinc lib. VII, cap. 20: Angustus admodum trames est, per quem justitia hominem deducit in coelum. Idem docent lib. VI, capp. 3 et 4 integra, maxime ibid., cap. 7: Via mendax... multos tramites habet... via veritatis... et simplex... et angusta... et ardua, etc. BUN.

A most narrow path. The Brun. manuscript, angustissimo tramite; 4 Colbert, angustissimos tramites, faultily. 6 recent manuscripts and 5 common editions, per angustissimos tramites. Read on this below, book VI, ch. 3. — A most narrow path... should lead. For everywhere he lays down only one way, one path to immortality; hence book VII, ch. 20: "Very narrow is the path by which justice leads man to heaven." The whole of book VI, chs. 3 and 4, teaches the same, above all ibid., ch. 7: the lying way... has many paths... the way of truth... is both simple... and narrow... and steep, etc. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 318)

Page

  • running head: 609 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT (cut off at the right edge of the image)
  • marginal letters: A ‹vario genere deludunt›; B ‹Sed nimirum haec causa›; C ‹honorem; nec est virtutis›; D ‹beside the notes: morum mss. inter quos›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-word "divi-" (divitias in the next column), English cut as "ri-"; the column number in the head is blurred but reads 609; the running head is a line across the whole page, cut off at the image edge, recorded here only; the Variorum Notae at the page foot (from "didi autem ex 21 mss.", including the verse "Vivit apud superos, et habet sua munera virtus") are not set; "Quam tamen illa, inquit, accipit facile, exigit non acerbe" is printed without quotation marks, and the quotation marks in the English are supplied; "Laelius." stands without a verb as printed, and [says] is supplied
PL 6:610
objicies? quae imperia? quae regna? qui ista putat humana, sua bona divina judicat? » Quis ergo te sapientem, Laeli, putet, cum ipse tibi loquare contraria? et paulo post virtuti adimas, quae dedisti? Sed videlicet ignorantia veri facit incertam labantemque sententiam.
will you hold out? what commands? what kingdoms? the one who thinks these things human judges his own goods divine?" Who then would think you wise, Laelius, when you speak in contradiction of yourself, and a little later take away from virtue what you had given it? But plainly ignorance of the truth makes an opinion uncertain and wavering.
Deinde quid adjungis? « Sed si aut ingrati universi, aut invidi multi, aut inimici potentes suis virtutem praemiis spoliant. » O quam fragilem, quam inanem virtutem induxisti, si spoliari praemio suo potest! Quae si bona sua divina judicat, ut aiebas, qui possunt existere tam ingrati, tam invidi, tam potentes, qui virtutem spoliare valeant iis bonis, quae fuerint in eam collata divinitus? « Nae illa se, inquit, multis solatiis oblectat; maximeque suo decore seipsa sustentat. » Quibus solatiis? quo decore? cum in crimen saepe veniat, et in poenam decor ille vertatur. Quid enim, si ut Furius dicebat, « rapiatur, vexetur, exterminetur; egeat, auferantur ei manus, effodiantur oculi, damnetur, vinciatur, uratur, miseris etiam modis necetur, » perdetne suum praemium virtus? An potius peribit ipsa? Minime. Sed et mercedem suam Deo judice accipiet, et vivet, et semper vigebit. Quae si tollas, nihil potest in vita hominum tam inutile, tam stultum videri esse, quam virtus; cujus naturalis bonitas et honestas docere nos potest, animam non esse mortalem, divinumque illi a Deo praemium constitutum. Sed idcirco virtutem ipsam Deus sub persona stultitiae voluit esse celatam, ut mysterium veritatis ac religionis suae esset arcanum; ut has religiones, sapientiamque terrenam extollentem se altius, sibique multum placentem, vanitatis errorisque damnaret; ut proposita denique difficultate, angustissimus trames ad immortalitatis praemium sublime perduceret.
Then what do you add? "But if either all men in their ingratitude, or many in their envy, or powerful enemies despoil virtue of its rewards." O how fragile, how empty a virtue you have brought in, if it can be despoiled of its reward! If it judges its goods divine, as you were saying, what men can there be so ungrateful, so envious, so powerful, as to be able to despoil virtue of those goods which have been conferred on it by divine gift? "Truly," he says, "it delights itself with many consolations, and above all sustains itself by its own beauty." With what consolations? with what beauty? when it often comes to be accused of crime, and that beauty is turned into punishment. For what if, as Furius said, "it be seized, harassed, banished; be in want, have its hands cut off, its eyes gouged out, be condemned, bound, burnt, even be put to death in wretched ways," will virtue lose its reward? Or rather will it itself perish? By no means. But it will both receive its wage with God as judge, and will live, and will flourish for ever. If you take these things away, nothing in the life of men can seem so useless, so foolish, as virtue; whose natural goodness and honourableness can teach us that the soul is not mortal, and that a divine reward has been appointed for it by God. But for this reason God willed that virtue itself be hidden under the mask of folly, that the mystery of His truth and religion might be a secret; that He might condemn these religions, and the earthly wisdom that exalts itself too high and is greatly pleased with itself, of vanity and error; that, finally, a difficulty having been set before it, a very narrow path might lead to the sublime reward of immortality.
Docui, ut opinor, cur populus noster apud stultos stultus habeatur. Nam cruciari atque interfici malle, quam
I have shown, I think, why our people is held foolish among the foolish. For to prefer to be tortured and killed, rather than
Editors' notes and page, col. 610

Page

  • running head: ...R V. DE JUSTITIA. 610 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A tias objicies? quae imperia; B sustentat. » Quibus solatiis; C giones, sapientiamque terrenam; D scriptum habet, opinor (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "tias", the rest of a word broken from the column before (divitias); stray mark between "O" and "quam" not set; "vexetur" looks like "vexctur" in the scan, so the second e is UNSURE; the heading VARIORUM NOTAE and the notes below it are not set (apparatus)
PL 6:611
thura ⟨t⟩ribus digitis comprehensa in focum jactare, tam ineptum videtur, quam in periculo vitae, alterius animam magis curare quam suam. Nesciunt enim quantum sit nefas adorare aliud praeterquam Deum, qui condidit coelum atque terram; qui humanum genus finxit, inspiravit, luce donavit. Quod si servorum nequissimus habetur, qui dominum suum fuga deserit, isque verberibus, et vinculis, et ergastulo, et cruce, et omni malo dignissimus judicatur; et si filius eodem modo perditus atque impius existimatur qui patrem suum derelinquit, ne illi obsequatur, ob eamque causam dignus putatur, qui sit exhaeres, et cujus nomen in perpetuum de familia deleatur: quanto magis qui Deum deserit, in quem duo vocabula domini et patris aeque veneranda conveniunt? Nam ille, qui servum pretio comparat, quid in eum beneficii confert, praeter alimenta, quae illi utilitatis suae gratia subministrat? Et qui filium generat, non habet in potestate ut concipiatur, ut nascatur, ut vivat. Unde apparet non esse illum patrem, sed tantummodo generandi ministrum. Quibus ergo suppliciis dignus est desertor ejus, qui et dominus verus, et pater est, nisi quae Deus ipse constituit? qui spiritibus injustis aeternum paravit ignem; quod ipse per vates suos impiis ac rebellibus comminatur.
to throw incense, held in three fingers, onto a hearth seems as foolish as, in peril of life, to care more for another's soul than for one's own. For they do not know how great a sin it is to worship anything other than God, Who founded heaven and earth; Who fashioned the human race, breathed life into it, and endowed it with light. But if that slave is held the most worthless who deserts his master by flight, and he is judged most deserving of beatings, and chains, and the workhouse, and the cross, and every evil; and if a son is in the same way considered depraved and impious who abandons his father so as not to obey him, and for that reason is thought to deserve to be disinherited and to have his name erased from the family for ever: how much more he who deserts God, to Whom the two titles of master and father, equally to be revered, belong? For he who buys a slave for a price, what benefit does he confer on him besides food, which he supplies to him for the sake of his own advantage? And he who begets a son does not have it in his power that he be conceived, that he be born, that he live. Whence it is clear that he is not a father, but only the agent of begetting. Of what punishments, then, is the deserter of Him Who is both true Master and Father worthy, except those which God Himself has appointed? He has prepared eternal fire for the unjust spirits; and this He Himself, through His prophets, threatens against the impious and rebellious.
CAPUT XX.
Chapter XX.
De vanitate et sceleribus impiorum religionum, et Christianorum cruciatibus.
On the vanity and crimes of impious religions, and on the tortures of the Christians.
Discant igitur, et suarum et alienarum interfectores animarum, quam inexpiabile facinus admittant: primum, quod seipsos jugulant perditissimis daemonibus serviendo, quos Deus in aeterna supplicia
Let them learn, then, these slayers both of their own souls and of others', what an inexpiable crime they commit: first, that they cut their own throats by serving most abandoned demons, whom God, to eternal punishments,
Editors' notes and page, col. 611

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 319)

(1) ‹anchor: In focum jactare› · col 611

In focum jactare. Scripti 10, in focum jacere; ms. Tornes., in focis jacere.

To throw on the hearth. 10 manuscripts, in focum jacere; the Tornaesius manuscript, in focis jacere.

(printed under page 319)

(2) ‹anchor: Praeterquam Deum› · col 611

Praeterquam Deum. 1 Colbert., 1 Clarom. et Francius, praeter Deum. Eadem varietas infra, praeterquam alimenta, et praeter alimenta.

Except God. 1 Colbert, 1 Clermont and Franck, praeter Deum. The same variation below, praeterquam alimenta and praeter alimenta.

(printed under page 319)

(3) ‹anchor: Dominum suum› · col 611

Dominum suum. Sic reposui ex cunctis mss. et pluribus editis: bene. Vide seqq. Nonnullis impressis est, dominum summum, male.

His master. So I have restored from all the manuscripts and most editions: rightly. See what follows. In some printed editions is dominum summum (the highest master), wrongly.

(printed under page 319)

(4) ‹anchor: Exhaeres› · col 611

Exhaeres. De exhaeredatione liberorum titulus est in Institut. Imperialibus, lib. II, cap. 13. Exhaeredationis causae in Juris constitutionibus numerantur quatuordecim. BETULEIUS.

Disinherited. On the disinheriting of children there is a title in the Imperial Institutes, book II, ch. 13. Fourteen grounds for disinheritance are counted in the constitutions of the Law. BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 319)

(5) ‹anchor: Domini et patris› · col 611

Domini et patris. Vide lib. IV, cap. 3. Unus est pater vester, qui in coelis est. Matth. XXIII.

Of master and father. See book IV, ch. 3. One is your Father, who is in heaven. Matthew 23.

(printed under page 319)

(6) ‹anchor: Praeter alimenta› · col 611

Praeter alimenta. Ita mss. In editis est praeterquam.

Except food. So the manuscripts. In the editions is praeterquam.

(printed under page 319)

(7) ‹anchor: Non habet in potestate› · col 611

Non habet in potestate. Sic restitui ex edit. Rom. 1470, cunctisque mss. praeter 1 Reg. rec. et 12 edit. in quibus est, non habet potestatem.

Has it not in his power. So I have restored from the Rome edition of 1470 and all the manuscripts except 1 recent Royal and 12 editions, in which is non habet potestatem.

(printed under page 319)

(8) ‹anchor: Nisi quia Deus ipse constituit› · col 611

Nisi quia Deus ipse constituit. Habent ea verba omnes libri; et omnia recta, modo suppleas, nisi iis quae... constituit? Quod respicit constitutum supra. Sic lib. VI, cap. 25: Quid Deo dignum, nisi quod ipse... poposcit? BUN.

Except what God himself has appointed. All the books have these words; and all is right, provided you supply "except those which... he has appointed?" This looks back to constitutum above. So book VI, ch. 25: "What is worthy of God, except what he himself... has asked?" BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 319)

(9) ‹anchor: Impiis› · col 611

Impiis. Isai. ult. Eccl. VII, Judith. XVI, Ps. X. — Ignem, quod ipse... comminatur. Constanter libri quod, idque neutrum pro re, de qua actum, ponitur saepe; ut dixi ad cap. 17: Quod sc. se parasse injustis aeternum ignem; ut hoc capite supra: Superest.. vita... longior, quod... discimus. BUN.

To the ungodly. Isaiah, last chapter; Ecclesiasticus 7; Judith 16; Psalm 10. — Fire, which he himself... threatens. The books consistently have quod, and that neuter is often put for the matter under discussion; as I said on ch. 17: quod, that is, "that he had prepared eternal fire for the unjust"; as in this chapter above: "there remains... a longer life, which (quod)... we learn." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 319)

(10) ‹anchor: Praedonum suorum› · col 612

Praedonum suorum. Per praedones, inquit Walchius, intelligit pontifices, sacerdotes: immo vero intelligit daemonas; nam mox sequitur: Quos deos esse opinantur. Iterum c. 20: Adorant hostes suos, latrones et interfectores suos victimis placant, etc. Conf. lib. II, cap. 16; lib. V, cap. 21. BUN.

Of their robbers. By robbers, says Walch, "he means pontiffs, priests": nay rather, he means demons; for there follows at once: "whom they suppose to be gods." Again ch. 20: "They adore their enemies, they appease with victims their robbers and murderers," etc. Compare book II, ch. 16; book V, ch. 21. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 319)

(11) ‹anchor: Instigationibus› · col 612

Instigationibus. lib. IV, cap. 27: Instigantibus... daemonibus; cap. 30, Instinctibus daemonum. Lib. V, cap. 21: Spiritus... perditi... instigant nescios in furorem. BUNEMAN.

By instigations. Book IV, ch. 27: "at the instigation of... demons"; ch. 30, "by the promptings of demons." Book V, ch. 21: "Lost... spirits... goad the unknowing to frenzy." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 319)

(12) ‹anchor: Inhaerentes persuasioni vulgari› · col 612

Inhaerentes persuasioni vulgari. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. haerent; alter Bonon. recentior inhaerent. Scripti 18, inhaerente persuasione vulgari. — Inhaerente persuasione vulgari. Rost., Ven. 1471, 72, utraque 78, Parrh., Junt., Ald., et reliqui, inhaerentes persuasioni vulgari. Participium exprimit melius voluntatem; dicit enim statim, eos libenter errare: ut l. I, cap. 1: Multi enim superstitionibus vanis pertinaciter inhaerentes, obdurant se contra manifestam veritatem. BUN.

Clinging to the common belief. 1 old Bologna manuscript, haerent; the other, more recent Bologna, inhaerent. 18 manuscripts, inhaerente persuasione vulgari (while the common belief clings). — Inhaerente persuasione vulgari. Rostock, Venice 1471, 72, both of 78, Parrhasius, Junta, Aldus and the rest, inhaerentes persuasioni vulgari. The participle better expresses the will; for he says at once that they err willingly: as in book I, ch. 1: "For many, clinging stubbornly to vain superstitions, harden themselves against the manifest truth." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 319)

(13) ‹anchor: Ignoratio› · col 612

Ignoratio. Ita antiquiores et potiores mss. et octo editi. Haec vox Lactantio familiaris. Scripti 18 rec. et septem impressi ignorantia.

Ignorance. So the older and better manuscripts and eight editions. This word is familiar to Lactantius. 18 recent manuscripts and seven printed, ignorantia.

(printed under page 319)

(14) ‹anchor: Ea faciunt in corporibus› · col 612

Ea faciunt in corporibus. Eleganter. Cic. in Verrem, Act. I, c. 5: Neque hoc solum in statuis ornamentisque fecit. Conf. Cortium ad Sall. Catil. 11, n. 4, p. 47: Foeda crudeliaque in civibus facinora facere. BUNEMAN.

Do those things to bodies. Elegantly. Cicero, Against Verres, first action, ch. 5: "Nor did he do this only to statues and ornaments." Compare Cortius on Sallust, Catiline 11, n. 4, p. 47: "to commit foul and cruel deeds upon citizens." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 319)

(15) ‹anchor: Tenebras› · col 612

Tenebras. Haec alludunt ad illud Isaiae cap. V, 20: Vae dicentibus malum bonum, et bonum malum; qui (continues)

Darkness. These words allude to that of Isaiah 5:20: "Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who (continues)

(printed under page 319)

Page

  • running head: 611 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹thura tribus digitis comprehensa›; B ‹ille, qui servum pretio comparat›; C ‹Discant igitur, et suarum›; D ‹beside the Variorum notes, at "Exhaeres. De exhaeredatione ... Exhaereda-"›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: first word printed with a mark over the final a (thurà?), set thura, UNSURE; t of tribus damaged (looks like J); the scan blurs several letters (u/n in aliud, dominum, vinculis, verus; e/c in eum, et, conveniunt; focum looks like focunt), read as sense requires, UNSURE whether any are true misprints; stray mark before religionum in the italic summary not set; impiorum in the summary agrees badly with religionum, kept as printed; the full-width heading VARIORUM NOTAE is not set; the column ends mid-sentence before damnavit (next column); Variorum notes at the page foot not set (later pass)
PL 6:612
damnavit: deinde, quod nec ab aliis Deum coli patiuntur, sed avertere homines ad mortifera sacra contendunt; nitunturque summa diligentia, ne qua sit anima incolumis in terra, quae salvo statu suo spectet in coelum. Quid aliud dicam quam miseros, qui praedonum suorum instigationibus parent, quos deos esse opinantur? quorum neque conditionem, neque originem, neque nomina, neque rationem sciunt: sed inhaerentes persuasioni vulgari, libenter errant, et stultitiae suae favent. A quibus si persuasionis ejus rationem requiras, nullam possint reddere: sed ad majorum judicia confugiant, quod illi sapientes fuerint, illi probaverint, illi scierint, quid esset optimum; seque ipsos sensibus spoliant, ratione abdicant, dum alienis erroribus credunt. Sic impliciti rerum omnium ignorantia, nec se, nec deos suos norunt. Atque utinam soli errare, soli desipere vellent! Alios etiam in consortium mali sui rapiunt, quasi habituri solatium de perditione multorum. Sed haec ipsa ignoratio efficit, ut in persequendis sapientibus tam mali sint, fingantque se illis consulere, illos ad bonam mentem velle revocare.
has condemned: then, that they do not suffer God to be worshipped by others either, but strive to turn men aside to deadly rites; and they endeavour with the utmost diligence that there be no soul unharmed on earth which, with its state kept safe, may look towards heaven. What else am I to call them but wretched, who obey the instigations of their robbers, whom they suppose to be gods? whose condition they do not know, nor their origin, nor their names, nor their nature: but clinging to the common persuasion, they err willingly and indulge their own folly. If you ask of them the reason for that persuasion, they can give none: but they take refuge in the judgements of their forefathers, that those men were wise, those men approved it, those men knew what was best; and they strip themselves of their senses, they renounce reason, while they put their faith in the errors of others. Thus entangled in ignorance of all things, they know neither themselves nor their gods. And would that they were willing to err alone, to be foolish alone! They drag others too into partnership in their evil, as though they would have some consolation from the perdition of many. But this very ignorance brings it about that they are so wicked in persecuting the wise, and pretend that they are taking counsel for them, that they wish to recall them to a right mind.
Num igitur hoc sermone, aut aliqua ratione reddita facere nituntur? Minime; sed vi atque tormentis. O mira, et caeca dementia! In iis putatur mala mens esse, qui fidem servare conantur; in carnificibus autem bona. In iisne mala mens est, qui contra jus humanitatis, contra fas omne lacerantur? an potius in iis qui ea faciunt in corporibus innocentum, quae nec saevissimi latrones, nec iratissimi hostes, nec immanissimi barbari aliquando fecerunt? Adeone etiam sibi mentiuntur, ut vicissim boni ac mali nomina transferant et immutent? Quid ergo non diem, noctem vocant? solem, tenebras? Alioquin eadem
Do they then try to do this by speech, or by some reason given? Not at all; but by force and tortures. O wondrous and blind madness! A bad mind is thought to be in those who try to keep faith; but in the executioners a good one. Is the bad mind in those who are torn apart against the law of humanity, against all that is right? or rather in those who do such things on the bodies of the innocent as neither the most savage robbers, nor the most enraged enemies, nor the most monstrous barbarians have ever done? Do they lie even to themselves to such a degree that they transfer and exchange in turn the names of good and evil? Why then do they not call day night? the sun darkness? Otherwise it is the same
Editors' notes and page, col. 612

Page

  • running head: [LA]CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 612 (first letters cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹damnavit : deinde›; B ‹se, nec deos suos norunt›; C ‹immanissimi barbari aliquando›; D ‹21 : Spiritus... perditi (in the Variorum Notae at the page foot)›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: full-width heading "[V]ARIORUM NOTAE" cut off at left edge, not set; the Variorum Notae at the page foot (Praedonum suorum... to Tenebras...) left for the later pass; coelum printed with œ ligature; "innocentum" as printed (genuine variant form, not marked as misprint); column ends mid-sentence at "eadem"
PL 6:613
impudentia est, bonis malorum nomen imponere; sapientibus, stultorum; justis, impiorum: quinimo, si qua illis fiducia est, vel in philosophia, vel in eloquentia, arment se, ac refellant haec nostra, si possunt: congrediantur cominus, et singula quaeque discutiant. Decet eos suscipere defensionem deorum suorum, ne, si nostra invaluerint (ut quotidie invalescunt), cum delubris ac ludibriis suis deserantur. Et quoniam vi nihil possunt (augetur enim religio Dei, quanto magis premitur) ratione potius et hortamentis agant.
impudence to impose the name of the wicked on the good, of fools on the wise, of the impious on the just. Nay rather, if they have any confidence either in philosophy or in eloquence, let them arm themselves and refute these [arguments] of ours, if they can; let them engage at close quarters and examine each point one by one. It befits them to undertake the defence of their gods, lest, if our [teachings] prevail (as they prevail daily), they be deserted together with their shrines and their mockeries. And since they can achieve nothing by force (for the religion of God increases the more it is oppressed), let them act rather by reason and exhortations.
Procedant in medium pontifices, seu minores, seu maximi; flamines, augures, item reges sacrificuli, quique sunt sacerdotes et antistites religionum. Convocent nos ad concionem: cohortentur ad suscipiendos cultus deorum; persuadeant multos esse quorum numine ac providentia regantur omnia: ostendant origines et initia sacrorum ac deorum, quomodo sint mortalibus tradita; qui fons, quae ratio sit, explicent; proferant, quae merces in cultu, quae poena in contemptu maneat, quare ab hominibus coli se velint, quid illis, si beati sunt, humana pietas conferat. Quae omnia non asseveratione propria (uec enim valet quidquam mortalis hominis auctoritas), sed divinis
Let the pontiffs come forward into the midst, whether the lesser or the greatest; the flamens, the augurs, likewise the sacrificial kings, and all who are priests and overseers of the religions. Let them call us together to an assembly; let them exhort us to take up the worship of the gods; let them persuade [us] that there are many by whose divinity and providence all things are governed; let them show the origins and beginnings of the sacred rites and of the gods, how they were handed down to mortals; let them explain what their source is, what their rationale; let them set forth what reward awaits in worship, what punishment in contempt, why they wish to be worshipped by men, what human piety confers on them, if they are blessed. All of which, not by their own assertion (for the authority of a mortal man is worth nothing), but by divine
Editors' notes and page, col. 613

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 320)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page: Tenebras)› · col 613

(continued) ponunt tenebras in lucem, et lucem in tenebras; qui ponunt amarum in dulce, et dulce in amarum.

(printed under page 320)

(2) ‹anchor: Impudentia est› · col 613

Impudentia est. Mss. 8 rec., imprudentia; Jun., prudentia.

It is shamelessness. 8 recent manuscripts, imprudentia (imprudence); Junius, prudentia.

(printed under page 320)

(3) ‹anchor: Ne, si nostra› · col 613

Ne, si nostra. Ms. 1 Colbert. et quidam editi, nec, sed male.

Lest, if ours. 1 Colbert manuscript and certain editions, nec, but wrongly.

(printed under page 320)

(4) ‹anchor: Augetur... religio Dei... premitur› · col 613

Augetur... religio Dei... premitur. Vid. not. c. 13, c. 22, sqq. Tertull. Apol. extr.: Nec quidquam tamen proficit exquisitior quaeque crudelitas. Illecebra est magis sectae. Plures efficimur, quoties metimur a vobis. BUNEMAN.

The religion of God... is increased... is pressed down. See the notes on ch. 13, ch. 22 and following. Tertullian, end of the Apology: "Yet every more refined cruelty of yours profits nothing. It is rather an enticement to the sect. We become more numerous each time we are mown down by you." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 320)

(5) ‹anchor: Pontifices› · col 613

Pontifices. Apparet etiam Lactantii temporibus antiqua illa Romanorum sacerdotia viguisse. BETULEIUS.

Pontiffs. It is clear that those ancient priesthoods of the Romans still flourished in the times of Lactantius. BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 320)

(6) ‹anchor: Seu minores, seu maximi› · col 613

Seu minores, seu maximi. Pontifices Numa instituit, quibus Martium generum suum Maximum praefecit, penes quem summa ceremoniarum potestas erat. BETUL. — Fuere pontifices minores, Scribae pontificum qui fastos et commentarios habebant, fidelem custodiam rerum gestarum referebant, qui Annales maximi dicebantur; quique illis ministri aderant, quod omnis aevi gesta mandabant litteris, pontifices minores dicti sunt. Alex. ab Alex. lib. II, cap. 8.

Whether lesser or greatest. Numa instituted the pontiffs, over whom he set his son-in-law Marcius as Maximus, who held the highest authority over the ceremonies. BETULEIUS. — "There were lesser pontiffs: the scribes of the pontiffs, who kept the calendars and records and made a faithful record of events, which were called the Annales Maximi; and those who attended them as assistants, because they committed to writing the deeds of every age, were called lesser pontiffs." Alessandro Alessandri, book II, ch. 8.

(printed under page 320)

(7) ‹anchor: Flamines› · col 613

Flamines. Sive Diales, sive Martiales a Romulo instituti, sive Quirinales a Numa. BETULEIUS.

Flamens. Whether those of Jupiter, or those of Mars instituted by Romulus, or those of Quirinus by Numa. BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 320)

(8) ‹anchor: Augures› · col 613

Augures. Quos a Chaldaeis originem traxisse credunt, qui ab his ad Graecos, a Graecis ad Hetruscos, ab Hetruscis ad Latinos propagati sunt.

Augurs. Who are believed to have taken their origin from the Chaldeans, and to have spread from them to the Greeks, from the Greeks to the Etruscans, from the Etruscans to the Latins.

(printed under page 320)

(9) ‹anchor: Reges sacrificuli› · col 613

Reges sacrificuli. Qui post exactos reges instituti sunt, ut regiis praeessent sacris. De quibus lege Pomponium Laetum, Lucium Fenestellam, Alexandrum ab Alexandro, Blondum, etc. qui ex Livio, Dionysio, Varrone et aliis, de sacerdotiis Rom. multa memoriae prodiderunt. BETULEIUS. — Mss. 7 Reg., 2 Colb., Tornes., 2, Clarom., sacricolae.

Kings of sacrifices. Who were instituted after the expulsion of the kings, to preside over the royal rites. On them read Pomponius Laetus, Lucius Fenestella, Alessandro Alessandri, Biondo, etc., who from Livy, Dionysius, Varro and others recorded much about the Roman priesthoods. BETULEIUS. — 7 Royal manuscripts, 2 Colbert, Tornaesius, 2 Clermont, sacricolae (sacrificers).

(printed under page 320)

(10) ‹anchor: Cohortentur nos ad› · col 613

Cohortentur nos ad. Repetunt nos a me additum Angl., Lips. tert., Reimm. et editi ab anno 1465, 1521, Gymn. et Isaeus; omittunt Fasit., Gryph. et reliqui, et satis eleganter subauditur. BUN.

Let them exhort us to. The English manuscript, the third Leipzig, Reimmann, and the editions from the year 1465, 1521, Gymnicus and Isaeus repeat the nos I have added; Fasitelius, Gryphius and the rest omit it, and it is understood quite elegantly. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 320)

(11) ‹anchor: Quae merces in cultu, quae poena in contemptu maneat› · col 613

Quae merces in cultu, quae poena in contemptu maneat. Heumannus hic omnibus editoribus insultans tandem, Scribe, inquit, quae merces cultum, quae poena contemptum maneat. Mihi lectio communis omnium librorum satis elegans videtur, subaudito accusativo (continued on col 614) mortales, vel homines. BUN.

What reward awaits in worship, what punishment in contempt. Heumann here, at last scoffing at all the editors, says: "Write: what reward awaits worship, what punishment awaits contempt." To me the common reading of all the books seems elegant enough, with the accusative mortals or men understood. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 320)

(12) ‹anchor: Destringant aciem ingeniorum› · col 614

Destringant aciem ingeniorum. Editum antea ab omnibus, ut quoque habet Gothanus, distringant. Quod verbum hic minus quadrat; valet enim stringere in diversas partes: nisi intelligas sensu rariori, ubi valet ligare, constringere; atque ut Latinis destringere aciem, gladium, est expedire: sic Lactantius l. III, c. 8: expediant acumen suum. BUN.

Let them unsheathe the edge of their wits. Previously printed by everyone, as the Gotha manuscript too has it, distringant. That verb fits less well here; for it means to draw in different directions: unless you understand it in a rarer sense, where it means to bind, to constrain; and as for the Latins destringere aciem, gladium (to unsheathe edge, sword) is to make ready: so Lactantius, book III, ch. 8: "let them make ready their sharpness." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 320)

(13) ‹anchor: Afferatur› · col 614

Afferatur. Ita restitui ex omnibus prope mss. 9 Reg., 6 Colbert. aliisque multis, et edit. Rom. 1470. Scripti Jun. et 2 Lips. habent asserant, nec male; 1 Clarom. asserantur. 3 Oxonienses et 14 vulgati: afferatur.

Let it be brought forward. So I have restored from nearly all the manuscripts, 9 Royal, 6 Colbert and many others, and the Rome edition of 1470. The Junius and 2 Leipzig manuscripts have asserant, not badly; 1 Clermont, asserantur. 3 Oxford manuscripts and 14 common editions: afferatur.

(printed under page 320)

(14) ‹anchor: Et rationem› · col 614

Et rationem. Sic legendum cum 1 Colbert., nisi mavis ut rationem, quod est in vet. mss. 1 Bonon., 1 Reg., Cauc. et 15 aliis et edit. 2 vet. Rom., Is., Cellar. In 6 aliis manu exaratis rec. et 17 impressis est aut.

And the reason. So it should be read with 1 Colbert, unless you prefer ut rationem, which is in the old manuscripts 1 Bologna, 1 Royal, Cauc. and 15 others, and the 2 old Rome editions, Isaeus, Cellarius. In 6 other recent handwritten and 17 printed is aut.

(printed under page 320)

(15) ‹anchor: Qui devotione ac fide caret› · col 614

Qui devotione ac fide caret. Emman.: qui fide ac ratione careat. Non movenda prior lectio. Inf. Dei cultus devotionem maximam fidemque desiderat; cap. 22: Ut devotionem ac fidem... corroboret. De Opif., c. 19: Si quis fidem suam devotionemque non prodiderit. De Mort. Persec., c. 18, Adimere tibi fidem ac devotionem nulla vis potuit. Conf. lib. V, cap. VII. BUN.

Which lacks devotion and faith. Emmanuel: "which lacks faith and reason." The former reading should not be disturbed. Below: "the worship of God requires the greatest devotion and faith"; ch. 22: "that he may strengthen devotion and faith." On the Workmanship of God, ch. 19: "if anyone has not betrayed his faith and devotion." On the Deaths of the Persecutors, ch. 18: "No force could take from you your faith and devotion." Compare book V, ch. VII. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 320)

(16) ‹anchor: Hiscant› · col 614

Hiscant. Sic lego cum 1 ms. Reg. et 14 excusis: quod cum non intelligerent amanuenses 8 Reg., 6 Colb., Jun., Pen., Lips., Pal., Ultr. 2 Clarom., Brun., et 5 vet. edit. pro hiscant, scripserunt discant; 2 Bonon., Tax., dicant. Tit. Liv. lib. VI, 16: Nec attollere oculos aut hiscere audebunt. Arnob. lib. IV, an mutire, an hiscere.

Let them open their mouths. So I read with 1 Royal manuscript and 14 printed: which the copyists of 8 Royal, 6 Colbert, Junius, Pen., Leipzig, Palatine, Utrecht, 2 Clermont, Brun., and 5 old editions, not understanding it, wrote discant (let them learn) for hiscant; 2 Bologna, Tax., dicant. Livy, book VI, 16: "Nor will they dare to raise their eyes or open their mouths." Arnobius, book IV: "whether to mutter, whether to open one's mouth."

(printed under page 320)

(17) ‹anchor: Ridebitur› · col 614

Ridebitur. Haec lectio est omnium mss. et vet. edit. Rom. In caeteris impressis est irridebitur; in 1 Reg. veterrimo justitia ridebitur.

Will be laughed at. This is the reading of all the manuscripts and the old Rome edition. In the other printed editions is irridebitur; in 1 very old Royal, justitia ridebitur.

(printed under page 320)

(18) ‹anchor: Ex mortibus› · col 614

Ex mortibus. Ita antiquiores ac meliores mss. et octo editi. Scripti 16 rec. et 6 vulgati ex moribus. Sic quoque legitur apud Buneman, qui de hac variante notam sequentem exhibet. — Ex moribus. Confirmatur haec lectio ex l. I, c. 11. Jovem ex rebus gestis, et ex moribus hominem fuisse deprehendimus, etc. Conf. de Ira, c. 11: S. Augustin. de Civ. Dei lib. VII, c. 18: Unicuique deorum ex ejus ingenio, moribus, actibus, casibus, sacra constituta sunt. BUN.

From deaths. So the older and better manuscripts and eight editions. 16 recent manuscripts and 6 common editions, ex moribus (from characters). So too it is read in Bünemann, who gives the following note on this variant. — Ex moribus. This reading is confirmed from book I, ch. 11: "We find from his deeds and from his character that Jupiter was a man," etc. Compare On the Anger of God, ch. 11; St Augustine, City of God book VII, ch. 18: "For each of the gods rites were established from his temper, character, acts and fortunes." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 320)

Page

  • running head: 613 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹impudentia est, bonis malorum nomen›; B ‹dos cultus deorum; persuadeant multos›; C ‹Ne, si nostra. Ms. 1 Colbert.› (in the notes); D ‹Augures. Quos a Chaldaeis› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 6:614
aliquibus testimoniis confirment; sicuti nos facimus. Non est opus vi et injuria, quia religio cogi non potest: verbis potius quam verberibus res agenda est, ut sit voluntas. Distringant aciem ingeniorum suorum: si ratio eorum vera est, afferatur. Parati sumus audire, si doceant: tacentibus certe nihil credimus; sicut ne saevientibus quidem cedimus. Imitentur nos, et rationem rei totius exponant. Nos enim non illicimus, ut ipsi objectant: sed docemus, probamus, ostendimus. Itaque nemo a nobis retinetur invitus; inutilis est enim Deo, qui devotione ac fide caret. Et tamen nemo discedit, ipsa veritate retinente. Doceant isti hoc modo, si qua illis fiducia veritatis est, loquantur: hiscant, audeant (inquam) disputare nobiscum aliquid ejusmodi; jam profecto ab aniculis quas contemnunt, et a pueris nostratibus error illorum ac stultitia ridebitur. Cum enim sint peritisssimi, deorumque progeniem, et res gestas, et imperia, et interitus et sepulchra de libris noverint; ipsosque ritus, quibus sunt initiati, vel ex rebus gestis hominum, vel ex casibus, vel etiam ex mortibus natos sciant: incredibilis dementia est, deos putare, quos fuisse mortales negare non audeant; vel si tam impudentes fuerint ut negent, suae illos ac
testimonies of some kind let them confirm, as we do. There is no need of force and injury, because religion cannot be compelled: the matter must be conducted with words rather than with blows, so that there may be free will. Let them draw the edge of their wits: if their reasoning is true, let it be brought forward. We are ready to listen, if they teach: to those who keep silent we certainly give no credence, just as we do not even yield to those who rage. Let them imitate us, and set out the account of the whole matter. For we do not entice, as they themselves allege, but we teach, we prove, we demonstrate. And so no one is kept by us against his will; for he is useless to God who lacks devotion and faith. And yet no one departs, since the truth itself holds him back. Let these men teach in this manner, if they have any confidence in the truth; let them speak: let them open their mouths, let them dare (I say) to dispute with us something of this kind; then assuredly their error and folly will be laughed at by the little old women whom they despise, and by our boys. For since they are most learned, and know from books the offspring of the gods, and their deeds, and dominions, and deaths and tombs; and know that the very rites into which they have been initiated arose either from the deeds of men, or from their misfortunes, or even from their deaths: it is incredible madness to think those to be gods whom they do not dare to deny were mortal; or if they are so shameless as to deny it, their own writings and those
Editors' notes and page, col. 614

Page

  • running head: [LIBE]R V. DE JUSTITIA. 614 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: A vinis aliquibus testimoniis; B ab aniculis quas contemnunt; C gere in diversas partes (in Variorum notae); D Hiscant. Sic lego (in Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "vinis" of a word (di-vinis) broken from col. 613; English renders the whole word as "divine". Column ends mid-sentence at "ac". Full-width heading "[VARI]ARIORUM NOTAE" (cut off at left edge) stands below the text block, not set; the Variorum notae beneath it left for the later pass. No editors' matter in the text block.
  • misprints kept as printed: peritisssimi (for peritissimi)
PL 6:615
suorum litterae coarguant, ipsa denique illos sacrorum initia convincant. Sciant igitur vel ex hoc ipso, quantum intersit inter verum et falsum, quando ipsi, cum sint eloquentes, persuadere non possunt; imperiti ac rudes possunt, quia res ipsa et veritas loquitur.
of their own people refute them, and finally the very initiations of their sacred rites convict them. Let them know, then, even from this very fact, how great a difference there is between the true and the false, since they themselves, though they are eloquent, cannot persuade, while the unskilled and uncultivated can, because the matter itself and the truth speak.
Quid ergo saeviunt? ut stultitiam suam, dum minuere volunt, augeant. Longe diversa sunt carnificina et pietas; nec potest aut veritas cum vi, aut justitia cum crudelitate conjungi. Sed merito non audent de rebus quidquam docere divinis, ne et a nostris derideantur, et a suis deserantur. Nam fere vulgus, cui simplex incorruptumque judicium est, si mysteria illa cognoscat in memoriam mortuorum constituta, damnabit; aliudque verius, quod colat, quaeret. Hinc fida silentia sacris instituta sunt ab hominibus callidis, ut nesciat populus quid colat. Cum autem nos in eorum doctrinis versemur, cur nobis aut non credunt, qui utrumque novimus; aut invident, quia falsis vera praetulimus? Sed defendenda sunt, inquiunt, suscepta publicc sacra. O quam honesta voluntate miseri errant! Sentiunt enim, nihil esse in rebus humanis religione praestantius, eamque summa vi oportere defendi: sed ut in ipsa religione, sic in defensionis genere falluntur.
Why then do they rage? So that they increase their folly while they wish to lessen it. Butchery and piety are far apart; nor can either truth be joined with force, or justice with cruelty. But with good reason they dare not teach anything about divine matters, lest they be both laughed at by our people and deserted by their own. For generally the common people, whose judgement is simple and uncorrupted, if they should learn that those mysteries were instituted in memory of the dead, will condemn them, and will seek something truer to worship. Hence faithful silences were instituted for the sacred rites by crafty men, so that the people may not know what it worships. But since we are versed in their doctrines, why do they either not believe us, who know both, or envy us, because we have preferred true things to false? But, they say, the sacred rites publicly undertaken must be defended. O with what honourable intention the wretches go astray! For they perceive that there is nothing more excellent in human affairs than religion, and that it ought to be defended with the utmost force; but as in religion itself, so in the manner of its defence they are mistaken.
Editors' notes and page, col. 615

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 321)

(1) ‹anchor: Coarguant› · col 615

Coarguant. Mss. 12 rec. et 8 impressi, coarguent. Vide praeced. audeant, et seq. convincant. Jun. coarguantur.

Let them refute. 12 recent manuscripts and 8 printed, coarguent. See the preceding audeant and the following convincant. Junius, coarguantur.

(printed under page 321)

(2) ‹anchor: Convincant› · col 615

Convincant. Mss. 10 rec. et 6 editi, convincent.

Let them convict. 10 recent manuscripts and 6 editions, convincent.

(printed under page 321)

(3) ‹anchor: Cum sint› · col 615

Cum sint. Pro quum, quod est in melioribus mss. et impressis, in pluribus excusis erat quam. In mss. 3 Reg. rec., Brun. et edit. Ald., Crat., Graph., legitur qui.

Since they are. For quum, which is in the better manuscripts and printed editions, most printed editions had quam. In 3 recent Royal manuscripts, Brun., and the editions of Aldus, Cratander, Gryphius, one reads qui.

(printed under page 321)

(4) ‹anchor: Ne et a nostris derideantur› · col 615

Ne et a nostris derideantur. Conjunctionem restitui ex 6 Reg., 5 Colb., et 5 aliis ac 7 editis: pro et, est aut, in Reg. antiquissimo. In 5 rec. scriptis et 12 vulgatis deest et.

Lest they be mocked even by ours. I have restored the conjunction from 6 Royal, 5 Colbert, and 5 others and 7 editions: for et there is aut in a very old Royal. In 5 recent manuscripts and 12 common editions et is missing.

(printed under page 321)

(5) ‹anchor: Nam fere vulgus› · col 615

Nam fere vulgus. Ita scripti 12. In ms. Cauc. et 16 rec. necnon in editis, Nam forte vulgus.

For the crowd, generally. So 12 manuscripts. In the Cauc. manuscript and 16 recent, and also in the editions, Nam forte vulgus (for perhaps the crowd).

(printed under page 321)

(6) ‹anchor: Incorruptum..... judicium› · col 615

Incorruptum..... judicium. Incorruptum hic valet, castum, integrum, ut in Cicerone testis incorruptus atque integer, testimonium incorruptum. Pro Marcello cap. 9: Qui judicabunt..... fortasse incorruptius quam nos. BUN.

An uncorrupted... judgement. Incorruptum here means pure, whole, as in Cicero "an uncorrupted and upright witness, uncorrupted testimony." For Marcellus ch. 9: "Those who will judge... perhaps more incorruptly than we." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 321)

(7) ‹anchor: Fida silentia› · col 615

Fida silentia. Virgil. III Aeneid., v. 112. Quae cum imperarentur, dicebatur: Favete linguis. Unde proverbium Ostium obdite, profani. Cum hoc proverbio convenit Canon in decretis de Consecrat. dist. 2, qui arcet plebem a presbyterio. BETUL.

Faithful silences. Virgil, Aeneid III, line 112. When these were commanded, the words were "Guard your tongues." Hence the proverb "Shut the door, you uninitiated." With this proverb agrees the canon in the Decretum, De consecratione, distinction 2, which keeps the people out of the sanctuary. BETULEIUS.

(printed under page 321)

(8) ‹anchor: Cur nobis aut non credunt› · col 615

Cur nobis aut non credunt. 1 Ms. rec. credant; 2 Reg. rec., Jun., Cantabrig. multique impressi, Cur nobis aut nostris non credunt.

Why they either do not believe us. 1 recent manuscript, credant; 2 recent Royal, Junius, Cambridge and many printed, Cur nobis aut nostris non credunt (why they do not believe us or ours).

(printed under page 321)

(9) ‹anchor: Inquiunt› · col 615

Inquiunt. Vide supra lib. III Institution. init. cap. 3.

They say. See above, Institutes book III, beginning of ch. 3.

(printed under page 321)

(10) ‹anchor: O quam honesta voluntate› · col 615

O quam honesta voluntate. Ironice. Sic ferunt 3 mss. quorum unus est antiquissimus, alteri bonae notae. Ms. Cauc. ac 19 alii rec. et editi sex habent inhonesta.

O with how honourable a will. Ironically. So 3 manuscripts bear it, one of them very old, the others of good repute. The Cauc. manuscript and 19 other recent ones and six editions have inhonesta (dishonourable).

(printed under page 321)

(11) ‹anchor: Non occidendo, sed moriendo› · col 615

Non occidendo, sed moriendo. Haec lectio est omnium fere mss. et octo editorum. Et recte. Est enim relativum, occidere, et mori. Vide infra, ut religionem patientia vel morte defendas. 2 Reg. rec. et sex vulgati habent monendo. S. Bernardus Serm. 61 in Cantic.: Fides suadenda est, non imperanda; et Serm. 64, Haeretici capiantur potius quam effugentur; capiantur dico, non armis, sed argumentis quibus refelluntur errores eorum. Athanas. Apol. II. Caedes et vincula aliena sunt a nostra Ecclesia. Pro moriendo Cellarius et Heumannus habent monendo, quod, inquiunt, (continued on col 616) refertur ad persecutores, qui ferro et flammis superstitiones suas defendebant. — Non occidendo, sed moriendo. Apte Augustinus, de Civit. Dei l. 2, c. 29, Christianos rom. scribit: Adversus potestates inimicissimas conflixisse, easque fortiter moriendo vicisse. BUN.

Not by killing, but by dying. This is the reading of nearly all the manuscripts and eight editions. And rightly. For killing and dying are correlatives. See below, "that you may defend religion by patience or by death." 2 recent Royal and six common editions have monendo (by admonishing). St Bernard, Sermon 61 on the Song: "Faith is to be persuaded, not commanded"; and Sermon 64: "Let heretics be caught rather than driven off; caught, I say, not by arms but by arguments by which their errors are refuted." Athanasius, Apology II: "Slaughter and chains are foreign to our Church." For moriendo Cellarius and Heumann have monendo, which, they say, refers to the persecutors, who defended their superstitions with sword and flame. — Not by killing, but by dying. Aptly Augustine, City of God book 2, ch. 29, writes that the Roman Christians "fought against the most hostile powers," and bravely "conquered them by dying." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 321)

(12) ‹anchor: Si malo› · col 616

Si malo. Hic aliorum fere omnium malo, rectum. Malo, id est, scelere, quod est malum et malorum. Vid. supra, et c. 20. Bono... adducendi homines ad bonum... non malo. BUN.

If by evil. Here the malo of nearly all the others is right. Malo, that is, by crime, which is evil and of evil men. See above, and ch. 20: "By good... men are to be led to the good... not by evil." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 321)

(13) ‹anchor: Jam sublata, jam nulla est› · col 616

Jam sublata, jam nulla est. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. jam supplicatio nulla est.

It is already taken away, it is already nothing. 1 old Bologna manuscript, jam supplicatio nulla est (there is now no supplication).

(printed under page 321)

(14) ‹anchor: Fides conservata› · col 616

Fides conservata. Ms. Jun. et 5 vet. edit. consecrata; minus bene. Vide paulo post, fidem servat.... et fides servanda est.

Faith kept. The Junius manuscript and 5 old editions, consecrata; less well. See a little later, "keeps faith..." and "faith must be kept."

(printed under page 321)

(15) ‹anchor: Consequitur› · col 616

Consequitur. 1 Reg. rec. et Brun. consequetur. Vide praeced.

He obtains. 1 recent Royal and Brun., consequetur. See the preceding.

(printed under page 321)

(16) ‹anchor: Mortem occubuerit› · col 616

Mortem occubuerit. Sic habent quamplurimi mss. et cuncti ferme editi, sicut vitam vivere, apud eumdem Lactantium Divin. Institut. lib. I, cap. 14; lib. V, cap. 8; lib. VII, cap. 24: et libro de Opificio Dei, infatigabilem militiam Deo militemus. Sed Ciceronis etiam est, vitam vivere, Orat. IV in Verrem, n. 118. Itaque perperam scripserunt librarii morte occubuerit in mss. 5 Reg., 1 Colbert., Brun., edd. Rom. 1470, et Isaei. — Mortem occubuerit. Occumbere mortem recte latine, et saepe dicitur; vide Pitiscum ad Curt. lib. IV, c. 15: Ante oculos sui quisque regis mortem occumbere ducebant egregium; Gebhardum, Gruterum, Davisium ad Cic. I Tuscul., 42, fin.: Qui pro patria mortem non dubitaret occumbere. BUN.

Has met death. So very many manuscripts and nearly all editions have it, like vitam vivere (to live a life) in the same Lactantius, Divine Institutes book I, ch. 14; book V, ch. 8; book VII, ch. 24; and in the book On the Workmanship of God, "let us serve God an untiring service." But vitam vivere is Cicero's too, Fourth Speech against Verres, no. 118. So the copyists wrongly wrote morte occubuerit in 5 Royal manuscripts, 1 Colbert, Brun., the Rome edition of 1470, and Isaeus's. — Mortem occubuerit. Occumbere mortem is correct Latin and often said; see Pitiscus on Curtius book IV, ch. 15: "Each thought it glorious to meet death before the eyes of his king"; Gebhard, Gruter, Davies on Cicero, Tusculans I, 42, end: "who would not hesitate to meet death for his country." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 321)

(17) ‹anchor: Mortuis praemium potest virtutis exsolvere› · col 616

Mortuis praemium potest virtutis exsolvere. 1 Bonon. antiq., praemium mortis exsolvet.

Can pay the reward of virtue to the dead. 1 old Bologna, praemium mortis exsolvet (will pay the reward of death).

(printed under page 321)

(18) ‹anchor: Quoniam militia coelestis est, devotionem maximam› · col 616

Quoniam militia coelestis est, devotionem maximam, etc. Desumptum a militia corporali; milites enim se totos reipub. devovebant, aut Caesari consecrabant. Vegetius: Jurant autem per Deum, et per Christum, et per Spiritum sanctum, et per majestatem imperatoris, quae secundum Deum generi humano diligenda est et colenda: nam imperatori, cum Augusti nomen accepit, tanquam praesenti et corporali Deo fidelis est praestanda devotio, et impendendus pervigil famulatus.

Since it is a heavenly warfare, the greatest devotion, etc. Taken from bodily warfare; for soldiers devoted themselves wholly to the commonwealth, or consecrated themselves to Caesar. Vegetius: "They swear by God, and by Christ, and by the Holy Spirit, and by the majesty of the emperor, which after God is to be loved and honoured by the human race: for to the emperor, once he has received the name of Augustus, faithful devotion is to be shown as to a present and bodily God, and watchful service to be rendered."

(printed under page 321)

(19) ‹anchor: Aut praestabit precanti› · col 616

Aut praestabit precanti. Mss. 2 Reg. rec. pro precanti, legunt petenti.

Or will grant to one who prays. 2 recent Royal manuscripts read petenti (to one who asks) for precanti.

(printed under page 321)

Page

  • running head: 615 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A suorum litterae coarguant; B instituta sunt ab hominibus; C guantur. (Variorum notae); D arcet plebem a presbyterio (Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "Hinc fida silentia sacris" is printed centred on a line of its own (Virgil quotation) but runs on into "instituta sunt", so it is set within the paragraph; "publicc": final letter printed as c (possibly a broken e), set as printed (unsure); "credunt," has a stray speck after the comma, not set; column ends mid-word "fallun-" (fallun-tur continues in the next column), English completes the word; full-width heading "VARIORUM NOT[AE]" across both columns, cut off at the image edge, not set; the Variorum notae below it (Coarguant. Mss. 12 rec. ... to ... habent monendo, quod, inquiunt,) are left for the later apparatus pass
  • other: the word falluntur. was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 616
PL 6:616
Defendenda enim religio est, non occidendo, sed moriendo; non saevitia, sed patientia; non scelere, sed fide: illa enim malorum sunt, haec bonorum. Et necesse est, bonum in religione versari, non malum. Nam si sanguine, si tormentis, si malo religionem defendere velis, jam non defendetur illa, sed polluetur, atque violabitur. Nihil est enim tam voluntarium, quam religio, in qua si animus sacrificantis aversus est, jam sublata, jam nulla est. Recta igitur ratio est, nt religionem patientia vel morte defendas: in qua fides conservata, et ipsi Deo grata est, et religioni addit auctoritatem. Nam si is, qui in hac terrestri militia regi suo fidem servat in aliquo egregio facinore, si postea vixerit, acceptior fit et charior, si perierit, summam consequitur gloriam, quod pro duce suo mortem occubuerit: quanto magis imperatori omnium Deo fides servanda est, qui non tantum viventibus, sed etiam mortuis praemium potest virtutis exsolvere? Igitur Dei cultus, quoniam militia coelestis est, devotionem maximam fidemque desiderat. Quomodo enim Deus aut amabit colentem, si ipse non ametur ab eo; aut quomodo praestabit precanti quidquid oraverit, cum ad precandum neque ex animo, neque observanter accedat? Isti autem, cum ad sacrificandum
For religion is to be defended not by killing, but by dying; not by cruelty, but by patience; not by crime, but by faith: for those things belong to the wicked, these to the good. And it is necessary that good, not evil, should have its place in religion. For if you should wish to defend religion with blood, with tortures, with evil, it will no longer be defended, but will be polluted and violated. For nothing is so voluntary as religion, in which, if the mind of the one sacrificing is turned away, it is at once taken away, it is at once nothing. The right course, therefore, is that you defend religion by patience or by death: in which faith, preserved, is both pleasing to God Himself and adds authority to religion. For if he who in this earthly warfare keeps faith with his king in some outstanding deed becomes, if he lives afterwards, more acceptable and dearer, and if he perishes, attains the highest glory, because he has met death for his leader: how much more must faith be kept with God, the commander of all, Who is able to pay the reward of virtue not only to the living but also to the dead? Therefore the worship of God, since it is a heavenly warfare, requires the greatest devotion and faith. For how will God either love the worshipper, if He is not loved by him; or how will He grant to the one praying whatever he has prayed for, when he approaches to pray neither from the heart nor reverently? But these men, when they come to sacrifice,
Editors' notes and page, col. 616

Page

  • running head: [LA]CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. (left edge cut off; "CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT." visible)
  • marginal letters: A ‹tur. Defendenda enim religio›; B ‹mortem occubuerit : quanto magis›; C ‹stitiones suas defendebant› (in the Variorum notes); D ‹in mss. 5 Reg., 1 Colbert.› (in the Variorum notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column opens with "tur." completing a word broken from col. 615, not visible here; last word "sa-" broken across the column break; "nt" may be a damaged or inverted "u" rather than a true misprint (UNSURE); the "VARIORUM NOTAE" heading and notes below the text block are not set (later pass); left-column fragments belong to col. 615 and are not set; no editors' matter in the text block
PL 6:617
veniunt, nihil intimum, nihil proprium diis suis offerunt; non integritatem mentis, non reverentiam, non timorem. Peractis itaque sacrificiis inanibus, omnem religionem in templo, et cum templo, sicut invenerant, relinquunt; nihilque secum ex ea neque afferunt, neque referunt. Inde est, quod ejusmodi religiones neque bonos facere possunt, neque firmae atque immutabiles esse.
offer to their gods nothing inward, nothing of their own: not integrity of mind, not reverence, not fear. And so, when the empty sacrifices are completed, they leave all their religion in the temple and with the temple, just as they had found it; and from it they neither bring anything with them nor carry anything back. Hence it is that religions of this kind can neither make men good nor be firm and unchangeable.
Traducuntur itaque ab his homines facile, quia nihil ibi ad vitam, nihil ad sapientiam, nihil ad fidem discitur. Quae est enim superstitio illorum deorum? quae vis? quae disciplina? quae origo? quae ratio? quod fundamentum? quae substantia? quo tendit? aut quid pollicetur, ut ab homine possit fideliter servari, fortiterque defendi? In qua nihil aliud video, quam ritum ad solos digitos pertinentem. Nostra vero religio eo firma est, et solida, et immutabilis, quia justitiam docet, quia nobiscum semper est, quia tota in animo colentis est, quia mentem ipsam pro sacrificio habet. Illic nihil exigitur aliud, quam sanguis pecudum, et fumus, et inepta libatio: hic, bona mens, purum pectus, innocens vita. Illuc veniunt sine delectu adulterae impudicae, lenae procaces, obscoenae meretrices; veniunt gladiatores, latrones, fures, venefici, et precantur nihil aliud, quam ut scelera impune committant. Quid enim latro sacrificans, aut gladiator roget, nisi ut occidant? Quid venenarius, nisi ut fallat? Quid meretrix, nisi ut plurimum peccet?
Men are therefore easily drawn away from these, because nothing is learned there for life, nothing for wisdom, nothing for faith. For what is the superstition of those gods? What is its force? What its discipline? What its origin? What its reasoning? What its foundation? What its substance? Where does it tend? Or what does it promise, that it could be faithfully kept and bravely defended by a man? In it I see nothing other than a rite that pertains to the fingers alone. But our religion is firm, and solid, and unchangeable for this reason: because it teaches justice, because it is always with us, because it lies wholly in the soul of the worshipper, because it has the mind itself as its sacrifice. There nothing else is required than the blood of cattle, and smoke, and a foolish libation; here, a good mind, a pure breast, an innocent life. To that place come without discrimination unchaste adulteresses, wanton procuresses, obscene harlots; there come gladiators, robbers, thieves, poisoners, and they pray for nothing else than that they may commit their crimes with impunity. For what would a robber, when sacrificing, or a gladiator ask, except that they may kill? What the poisoner, except that he may deceive? What the harlot, except that she may sin very much?
Editors' notes and page, col. 617

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 322)

(1) ‹anchor: In templo, et cum templo› · col 617

In templo, et cum templo. Deest et cum templo in tribus rec. scriptis.

In the temple, and with the temple. Et cum templo is missing in three recent manuscripts.

(printed under page 322)

(2) ‹anchor: Nihilque secum ex ea neque afferunt› · col 617

Nihilque secum ex ea neque afferunt. In 1 Bonon. antiq. deest ex ea; 1 Reg. abest neque.

And they bring nothing from it with them. In 1 old Bologna ex ea is missing; from 1 Royal neque is absent.

(printed under page 322)

(3) ‹anchor: Neque firmae atque immutabiles› · col 617

Neque firmae atque immutabiles. Ita mss. 1 Bonon., 6 Colb. et 5 alii, ac 9 vet. edit. aliae vero, neque firmos ac immutabiles. At nostra lectio melior est; opponit enim falsas religiones verae, quae firma est et immutabilis.

Neither firm nor unchangeable. So the manuscripts 1 Bologna, 6 Colbert and 5 others, and 9 old editions; the others, however, neque firmos ac immutabiles. But our reading is better; for he sets the false religions against the true one, which "is firm and unchangeable."

(printed under page 322)

(4) ‹anchor: Lenae procaces› · col 617

Lenae procaces. Lenas, quae infra, multos bonis exuunt, docte vocat procaces. Festus: Procari poscere est; unde et proci, et procaces meretrices ab assidue poscendo. BUN.

Brazen bawds. The bawds who, below, "strip many of their goods," he learnedly calls procaces. Festus: "Procari is to demand; whence both suitors (proci) and brazen (procaces) harlots, from their constant demanding." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 322)

(5) ‹anchor: Ut occidant› · col 617

Ut occidant. 9 Reg. mss., 1 Clarom. et 8 edit. occidat. Utraque lectio bona.

That they may kill. 9 Royal manuscripts, 1 Clermont and 8 editions, occidat. Both readings are good.

(printed under page 322)

(6) ‹anchor: Quid venenarius?› · col 617

Quid venenarius? Mss. 2. Reg. rec., 1 Colbert. a secunda manu., Torn., Em., Cant. et 3 vet. edit. Rom., foenerarius? nisi ut fallat, id est, latenter agat, machinationes suas occultet. — Quid venenarius. Venenarius ponitur pro venefico supra; et quisnam magis fallit, quam veneficus, venenarius? Hinc loco gemino lib. V, c. 9: Si palam grassari non licuit, venena clam temperent; qui uxores necent, ut dotes earum lucrentur, aut maritos, ut adulteris nubant... qui coelum ipsum veneficiis appetant. BUN.

What does the poisoner? 2 recent Royal manuscripts, 1 Colbert in the second hand, Tornaesius, Em., Cambridge and 3 old Rome editions, foenerarius? (the usurer) nisi ut fallat, that is, that he may act secretly and hide his schemes. — What does the poisoner. Venenarius is put for veneficus above; and who deceives more than a poisoner? Hence in the twin passage, book V, ch. 9: "If they were not allowed to rob openly, let them mix poisons secretly; men who kill their wives to profit by their dowries, or their husbands to marry their adulterers... who assail heaven itself with sorceries." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 322)

(7) ‹anchor: Nisi ut mortem viri optet, aut ut sua impudicitia celetur› · col 617

Nisi ut mortem viri optet, aut ut sua impudicitia celetur. Sic editiones Betuleii, Cellarii, Walchi, Heumanni, atque pauci mss., Cantabrigiense scilicet et Lipsiense; in aliis tum mss. tum editis legitur, nisi aut mortem viri, aut ut sua impudicitia celetur, quod mancam exhibet orationem.

Except that she may wish for her husband's death, or that her unchastity be hidden. So the editions of Betuleius, Cellarius, Walch, Heumann, and a few manuscripts, namely the Cambridge and the Leipzig; in others, both manuscripts and editions, one reads "except either her husband's death, or that her unchastity be hidden," which gives a defective sentence.

(printed under page 322)

(8) ‹anchor: Quid lena?› · col 617

Quid lena? Mss. 10, leno, virili genere. Caeteri omnes ut in textu.

What does the bawd? 10 manuscripts, leno, in the masculine. All the rest as in the text.

(printed under page 322)

(9) ‹anchor: Sacrificare› · col 617

Sacrificare. Ita 6 vet. edit. cum omnibus mss. prae- (continued on col 618) ter 2 Reg. et 11 edit. In iis est, sacrificasse; in 1 Reg. rec. satisfacere.

To sacrifice. So 6 old editions with all the manuscripts except 2 Royal and 11 editions. In these is sacrificasse; in 1 recent Royal, satisfacere.

(printed under page 322)

(10) ‹anchor: Si cutem laverint› · col 618

Si cutem laverint. Quaevis scelera aqua expiabant. Cato Orig. 5; Tertull. de Bapt., cap. 5; Seneca in Hercule furente; Apuleius Mil. l. XI; Dion. lib. XLVIII; Eurip. in Iphig. Taur.; Clemens Alexand. lib. VII Strom. Corpus autem totum, vel manus tantummodo lavabant, juxta Sophocl. enarrator. Athenaeum l. IX: Mos erat veteribus, quando sive caedem hominis sive ali as caedes fecissent, lavare manus, in purgationem piaculi. Apud veteres enim optimum et grave habebatur manus lavare. Justin. Martyr. Apol. II: Et balneum quidem hos resciscentes daemones a propheta praedicatum operati sunt, et ipsos aspergere ad sacra sua accedentes, et immittere eis constituerunt libamina, et nidores talia perficientes: perficiebant vero ut accedentes se lavarent, priusquam ascenderent ad sacra; inde purgati operabantur sacris. Sed et caedem credebant aspergine tolli, quod Maro II Aeneid. attingit. Hinc Pilatus lavat manus, ut se innoxium, vel insontem mortis Christi declaret. Vide Matt. XXVII, v. 24.

If they have washed the skin. They expiated any crimes with water. Cato, Origins 5; Tertullian, On Baptism, ch. 5; Seneca in the Hercules Furens; Apuleius, Metamorphoses book XI; Dio, book XLVIII; Euripides in the Iphigenia in Tauris; Clement of Alexandria, Stromata book VII. They washed the whole body, or only the hands, according to the commentator on Sophocles, and Athenaeus, book IX: "It was the custom of the ancients, when they had committed the slaying of a man or other slayings, to wash their hands in cleansing of the guilt. For among the ancients washing the hands was held most excellent and solemn." Justin Martyr, Apology II: "And the demons, learning of the bath proclaimed by the prophet, set it to work, and established that those approaching their rites should sprinkle themselves, and offer them libations and savours in performing these things: they arranged that those approaching should wash themselves before they went up to the rites; thus cleansed they took part in the sacrifices." And they believed that bloodshed too was removed by sprinkling, which Virgil touches on in Aeneid II. Hence Pilate washes his hands, to declare himself guiltless, or innocent, of the death of Christ. See Matthew 27:24.

(printed under page 322)

(11) ‹anchor: Abluant› · col 618

Abluant. Ita fere Ovid. in Fastis: O nimium faciles, qui tristia crimina caedis / Fluminea tolli posse putatis aqua!

Wash away. So nearly Ovid in the Fasti: "O too easy-going, who think that the grim crimes of bloodshed can be removed by river water!"

(printed under page 322)

(12) ‹anchor: Sordidatur› · col 618

Sordidatur. Vox ecclesiastica, quam apud probae latinitatis auctores non reperies: sed adjectivum sordidatus passim apud Ciceronem. — Ulli amnes abluant. Ut ex cap. 20 infra patet, etiam hic respexit ad Cic. l. II, de Leg. 10: Caste jubet lex adire ad deos, animo videlicet, in quo sunt omnia: nec tollit castimoniam corporis... nam illud vel aspersione aquae... tollitur: animi labes nec diuturnitate vanescere, nec amnibus ullis elui potest. BUN.

Is soiled. A church word, which you will not find in authors of sound Latinity: but the adjective sordidatus is everywhere in Cicero. — Any rivers wash away. As is clear from ch. 20 below, here too he had in view Cicero, On the Laws book II, 10: "The law commands us to approach the gods chastely, that is, in mind, in which are all things: nor does it remove purity of body... for that is removed even by a sprinkling of water...: a stain of the mind can neither fade with time nor be washed out by any rivers." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 322)

(13) ‹anchor: Isti autem› · col 618

Isti autem. Mss. 4 et octo editi, Ipsi. Caeteri tum mss., tum impressi, Isti.

But these men. 4 manuscripts and eight editions, Ipsi. The rest, both manuscripts and printed, Isti.

(printed under page 322)

Page

  • running head: 617 LIBER V. DE JUST (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A crificandum veniunt; B tum ad solos digitos pertinentem; C In templo, et cum templo (in the Variorum notae); D Quid venenarius? Mss. 2. Reg. rec. (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "crificandum", the rest of sa- broken from col. 616; column ends "pec-" broken across the column break; running head printed across both columns and cut off, not set; the VARIORUM NOTAE heading and notes at the page foot belong to the later apparatus pass and are not set; "obscoenae" read as œ, but the type is small and it could be æ (UNSURE); "sicut" is printed with damaged i, read as sicut; editors' matter: (none)
PL 6:618
Quid adultera, nisi ut mortem viri optet, aut ut sua impudicitia celetur? Quid lena, nisi ut multos bonis exuat? Quid fur, nisi ut plura compilet? Hic vero etiam levi communique peccato locus est nullus. Et si quis ad sacrificium non integra conscientia venerit, audit quae illi Deus comminetur, ille qui latebras cordis videt, qui peccatis semper infestus est, qui exigit justitiam, qui fidem poscit. Quis hic malae menti, aut malae preci locus est? At illi infelices, nec ex scele⟨r⟩ibus suis intelligunt quam malum sit, quod colunt, quandoquidem flagitiis omnibus inquinati, veniunt ad precaudum; et se pie sacrificare opinantur, si cutem laverint: tanquam libidines intra pectus inclusas ulli amnes abluant, aut ulla maria purificent. Quanto satius est mentem potius eluere, quae malis cupiditatibus sordidatur; et uno virtutis ac fidei lavacro universa vitia depellere? Quod qui fecerit, quamlibet inquinatum ac sordidum corpus gerat, satis purus est.
What does the adulteress [pray for], except that she may wish for her husband's death, or that her unchastity may be concealed? What the procuress, except that she may strip many of their goods? What the thief, except that he may plunder more? But here there is no place even for a light and common sin. And if anyone comes to the sacrifice without a sound conscience, he hears what God threatens against him, He Who sees the hiding-places of the heart, Who is ever hostile to sins, Who demands justice, Who requires faith. What place is there here for a wicked mind or a wicked prayer? But those unhappy men do not understand even from their own crimes how evil is that which they worship, since, defiled with every disgraceful deed, they come to pray; and they think that they sacrifice piously if they have washed their skin: as though any rivers could wash away, or any seas purify, the lusts shut up within the breast. How much better it is rather to wash clean the mind, which is soiled by evil desires, and by the one bath of virtue and faith to drive out all vices? Whoever has done this, however defiled and dirty a body he may bear, is pure enough.
CAPUT XXI.
Chapter XXI.
De cultu deorum et Dei veri; atque de bestiis quas coluerunt Aegyptii.
On the worship of the gods and of the true God; and on the beasts which the Egyptians worshipped.
Isti autem, quia nesciunt, vel quid, vel quomodo sit colendum, caeci et imprudentes in contrarium cadunt. Adorant itaque hostes suos: latrones et interfectores suos victimis placant; et animas suas cum thure ipso cremandas aris detestabilibus imponunt. Irascuntur
But these men, because they do not know either what or how one must worship, blind and unwitting, fall into the opposite. They therefore adore their own enemies: they appease with victims their own robbers and murderers; and they place their own souls on detestable altars to be burned together with the very incense. They are angry
Editors' notes and page, col. 618

Page

  • running head: ER V. DE JUSTITIA. 618 (left edge cut; presumably LIBER V. DE JUSTITIA.)
  • marginal letters: A cet? Quid adultera; B quae malis cupiditatibus; C ter 2 Reg. et 11 edit. (in the notes, not set); D gati operabantur sacris (in the notes, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "cet?", the end of a word broken from the previous column (probably liceat or lateat), so the English keeps it as a fragment; in "scele⟨r⟩ibus" the r is damaged; there is a stray mark after "colunt," that is not set; the full-width line "[VA]RIORUM NOTAE." is cut off at the left edge and is not set; the Variorum notes at the page foot (Si cutem laverint, Abluant, Sordidatur, Isti autem) and the signature 20 are not set
PL 6:619
etiam miseri, quod non similes alii pereant, incredibili mentium caecitate. Quid enim videant, qui solem non vident? Quasi vero si dii essent, indigerent hominum auxilio, adversus contemptores suos. Quid ergo nobis irascuntur, si illi nihil possunt? nisi, quod ipsi deos suos destruunt, de quorum potestate diffidunt, magis irreligiosi quam qui omnino non colunt. Cicero in suis Legibus, cum caste ad sacrificia praeciperet accedere, « Pietatem, inquit, adhibento; opes amovento: qui secus facit, Deus ipse vindex erit. « Recte hoc quidem. Neque enim fas est desperare de Deo, quem ideo colas, quia potentem putes. Nam quomodo vindicare injuriam colentis se potest, si suam non potest? Libet igitur, ex his quaerere, cui potissimum praestare se putent, cogendo invitos ad sacrificium. Ipsisne, quos cogunt? at non est beneficium, quod ingeritur recusanti. Sed consulendum est etiam nolentibus, quando quid sit bonum, nesciunt. Cur ergo tam crudeliter vexant, cruciant, debilitant, si salvos volunt? aut unde pietas tam impia, ut eos miseris modis aut perdant, aut inutiles faciant, quibus velint esse consultum? An vero diis praestant? at non est sacrificium, quod exprimitur
too, the wretches, because others do not perish in like manner, by an incredible blindness of minds. For what could they see, who do not see the sun? As if indeed, were there gods, they would need the help of men against those who despise them. Why then are they angry with us, if those [gods] can do nothing? unless it is that they themselves destroy their own gods, whose power they distrust, being more irreligious than those who do not worship at all. Cicero in his Laws, when he directed that one should approach the sacrifices chastely, says, 'Let them bring piety; let them put away riches: whoever does otherwise, God Himself will be the avenger.' This indeed is rightly said. For it is not right to despair of God, whom you worship precisely because you think Him powerful. For how can He avenge the wrong done to one who worships Him, if He cannot avenge His own? I should like, then, to ask of these men to whom above all they think they are rendering a service by forcing the unwilling to sacrifice. To those very ones whom they force? But that is no benefit which is thrust upon one who refuses it. But, [they say,] one must look to the good even of the unwilling, since they do not know what is good. Why then do they so cruelly harass, torture and maim them, if they wish them saved? or whence comes a piety so impious that they either destroy in wretched ways, or render useless, those whom they wish to have looked after? Or do they render the service to the gods? But that is no sacrifice which is extorted
Editors' notes and page, col. 619

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 323)

(1) ‹anchor: Similes› · col 619

Similes. Heuman. legit simul et.

Like. Heumann reads simul et (and at the same time).

(printed under page 323)

(2) ‹anchor: Nobis irascuntur› · col 619

Nobis irascuntur. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq., bonis.

They are angry with us. 1 old Bologna manuscript, bonis (with the good).

(printed under page 323)

(3) ‹anchor: De quorum potestate diffidunt› · col 619

De quorum potestate diffidunt. De deest in mss. 2 Regiis; in altero rec. est potestati.

Of whose power they despair. De is missing in 2 Royal manuscripts; in another recent one is potestati.

(printed under page 323)

(4) ‹anchor: Cum caste› · col 619

Cum caste. Proprio adversarios jugulans gladio, recitat legem 12 Tabularum, ex secundo Ciceronis de Legibus libro, cujus primum caput est: Ad divos adeunto caste. Rem praeclarissime dictam plurativa perdit inflexione.

When chastely. Cutting his opponents' throats with their own sword, he quotes the law of the Twelve Tables, from the second book of Cicero's Laws, whose first head is: "Let them approach the gods chastely." He spoils a thing most finely said by the plural inflection.

(printed under page 323)

(5) ‹anchor: Pietatem› · col 619

Pietatem, etc. Alterum caput, Pietatem adhibento. Pietas autem animi est, quo Deus colitur: juxta illud, Deus spiritus est; adorandus ergo in spiritu et veritate. BETUL. Vide Ciceronem libro II de Legibus, sub init.

Piety, etc. The second head: "Let them bring piety." Piety belongs to the mind, with which God is worshipped: according to the saying "God is spirit"; he is therefore to be adored in spirit and truth. BETULEIUS. See Cicero, On the Laws book II, near the beginning.

(printed under page 323)

(6) ‹anchor: Opes amovento› · col 619

Opes amovento. Tertium hoc legis caput est, Opes amovento: ex Platonis, opinor, Alcibiade II desumptum, qui liber περὶ προσευχῆς inscribitur. At loco facit, existimat Betuleius legendum esse faxit, ut antiquarum legum majestas et stylus servetur.

Let them put away wealth. This is the third head of the law, "Let them put away wealth": taken, I think, from Plato's Alcibiades II, which book is entitled On Prayer. But in place of facit, Betuleius thinks one should read faxit, so that the majesty and style of the ancient laws may be kept.

(printed under page 323)

(7) ‹anchor: Deus ipse vindex erit› · col 619

Deus ipse vindex erit. Francius, forte ipsi. Ms. 1 Clarom. illi Deus judex erit.

God himself will be the avenger. Franck, perhaps ipsi. 1 Clermont manuscript, illi Deus judex erit (God will be his judge).

(printed under page 323)

(8) ‹anchor: Si suam non potest› · col 619

Si suam non potest. Mss. 13 et edit. 5, qui suam.

If he cannot his own. 13 manuscripts and 5 editions, qui suam.

(printed under page 323)

(9) ‹anchor: Quos cogunt› · col 619

Quos cogunt, etc. Epit. c. 53. Tertull. ad Scapul. c. 2: Nec religionis est cogere religionem, quae sponte suscipi debeat, non vi; quum et hostiae ab animo libenti expostulentur. Ita etsi nos compuleritis ad sacrificandum, nihil praestabitis diis vestris; ab invitis enim sacrificia non desiderabunt, nisi contentiosi sint: contentiosus autem Deus non est. BUN.

Whom they compel, etc. Epitome ch. 53. Tertullian, To Scapula ch. 2: "Nor is it a part of religion to compel religion, which ought to be taken up freely, not by force; since even victims are required from a willing mind. So even if you compel us to sacrifice, you will render nothing to your gods; for they will not want sacrifices from the unwilling, unless they are quarrelsome: but God is not quarrelsome." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 323)

(10) ‹anchor: Non est beneficium› · col 619

Non est beneficium. Hinc e contrario Jureconsulti dicunt: Volenti non fit injuria.

It is not a benefit. Hence, conversely, the jurists say: No wrong is done to one who consents.

(printed under page 323)

(11) ‹anchor: Eos miseris modis aut perdant› · col 619

Eos miseris modis aut perdant. Aut additum ex mss. et quamplurimis editis: in nonnullis deest.

Either destroy them in wretched ways. Aut has been added from the manuscripts and very many editions: in some it is missing.

(printed under page 323)

(12) ‹anchor: Inutiles faciant› · col 619

Inutiles faciant. Eo alludit Lact., l. VI, c. 11: Largire... debilibus, claudis... inutiles sunt hominibus, sed utiles Deo. Et infra, egentes atque inutiles alere. BUN.

Make them useless. Lactantius alludes to this in book VI, ch. 11: "Give... to the disabled, the lame... they are useless to men, but useful to God." And below: "to feed the needy and useless." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 323)

(13) ‹anchor: Faciunt› · col 619

Faciunt. Id est, sacrificant; et hoc sensu reperitur apud Varronem de L. L. lib. V, cap. 4, et Virgil. Eclog. 3, v. 77.

They make. That is, they sacrifice; and in this sense it is found in Varro, On the Latin Language book V, ch. 4, and Virgil, Eclogue 3, line 77.

(printed under page 323)

(14) ‹anchor: Quibus cum lacrymis› · col 619

Quibus cum lacrymis. Sic legendum ex mss. et quamplurimis editis; in nonnullis impressis deest cum.

With whose tears. So it should be read from the manuscripts and very many editions; in some printed editions cum is missing.

(printed under page 323)

(15) ‹anchor: Qui est omnium› · col 619

Qui est omnium. Scilicet Deus; mox enim praecessit Deum. Itaque perperam additur creator in mss. (continued on col 620) Cauc., 2 Reg. rec., Cant. et 11 editis: a caeteris abest.

Who is of all. Namely God; for Deum has just preceded. So creator is wrongly added in the Cauc. manuscript, 2 recent Royal, Cambridge and 11 editions: it is absent from the rest.

(printed under page 323)

(16) ‹anchor: Velit, nolit› · col 620

Velit, nolit. Ita quamplurimi mss., inter quos sunt veterrimi et optimi 1 Bonon., 3 Reg., 5 Oxon., 3 Lips., 2 Colbert., aliique. In mss. 13 et editis 5 est velint, nolint. Bunemannus quoque admittit hanc ultimam lectionem, et notam sequentem exhibet. — Pluralem recepi ex Cauc., Lips. 2, 3 Goth., Emm., Reimm., Ven. 1472, utraque 78. Ad rem Tertullianus Apologet. 23: Bene est, quod omnium Deus est, cujus, velimus, aut nolimus, omnes sumus. BUN.

Willing or not. So very many manuscripts, among them the very old and best, 1 Bologna, 3 Royal, 5 Oxford, 3 Leipzig, 2 Colbert, and others. In 13 manuscripts and 5 editions is velint, nolint. Bünemann too admits this last reading, and gives the following note. — I have received the plural from Cauc., Leipzig 2, 3, Gotha, Emmanuel, Reimmann, Venice 1472, both of 78. To the point, Tertullian, Apology 23: "It is well that he is the God of all, whose we all are, whether we will or not." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 323)

(17) ‹anchor: Quam etiam› · col 620

Quam etiam. Addidi etiam ex 3 vulgatis et omnibus mss. praeter 2 Reg. rec. in quibus deest, ut in plerisque editis. — Quam etiam servorum. Ego vero in Goth., Reimm., Emman., quam etiam inveniri addo et confirmo, tamquam Lactantio stylo conforme, ita ubi nihil obmovere potest Heumannus. Legitur de Ira, cap. 13. Omnia propter hominem proposita, tam bona, quam etiam mala. De Mort. pers., c. 48: Tam ego Constantinus Augustus, quam etiam ego Licinius Augustus. BUN.

As also. I have added etiam from 3 common editions and all the manuscripts except 2 recent Royal, in which it is missing, as in most editions. — As also of slaves. For my part I add that quam etiam is found in Gotha, Reimmann, Emmanuel, and I confirm it as conforming to Lactantius's style, so that Heumann can raise no objection. One reads in On the Anger of God, ch. 13: "All things set forth for the sake of man, the good as well as the evil." On the Deaths of the Persecutors, ch. 48: "Both I, Constantine Augustus, and also I, Licinius Augustus." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 323)

(18) ‹anchor: Labores› · col 620

Labores. Id est, calamitates.

Labours. That is, calamities.

(printed under page 323)

(19) ‹anchor: Ne verbo quidem reluctamur› · col 620

Ne verbo quidem reluctamur. Epit. cap. 53. Contra calumnias, quasi conspirarent Christiani contra imperatores, haec faciunt. BUN.

We do not resist even by a word. Epitome ch. 53. These words answer the slanders that the Christians were conspiring against the emperors. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 323)

(20) ‹anchor: Sed Deo remittimus› · col 620

Sed Deo remittimus. Remittimus, id est, reservamus. Lib. VI, c. 8: Ultionem suam non sibi assumat, sed judicio Dei reservet. BUN.

But we leave it to God. Remittimus, that is, we reserve. Book VI, ch. 8: "Let him not take his vengeance on himself, but reserve it to the judgement of God." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 323)

(21) ‹anchor: Qui defensores deorum suorum› · col 620

Qui defensores deorum suorum. Mss. 10 rec. totidemque editi addunt se esse.

Who... defenders of their gods. 10 recent manuscripts and as many editions add se esse.

(printed under page 323)

(22) ‹anchor: Efferate› · col 620

Efferate. Sic omnes. De hac vocula nondum ex antiquioribus observata nihil in lexicis, Krebsii dissertatione, Walchii diatribe. BUN.

Savagely. So all. Of this little word, not yet observed in older writers, there is nothing in the lexicons, in Krebs's dissertation, or in Walch's diatribe. BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 323)

(23) ‹anchor: Num pejus› · col 620

Num pejus. Bene. Vide seqq. mss. 1 Bonon. Num potius.

Is it worse. Rightly. See what follows. The manuscript 1 Bologna, Num potius.

(printed under page 323)

(24) ‹anchor: Aegyptiorum› · col 620

Aegyptiorum. Non modo a christianae philosophiae scriptoribus, sed a prophetis quoque, Aegyptiorum superstitio male audit. De animalibus quae ab Aegyptiis pro diis coluntur nemo copiosius scripsit, quam Herodotus in Euterpe. Vide etiam Philostratum, libro VI de Vita Apollonii, et Artheneum in septimo. Meminit etiam Cicero in Quinto Tusculan. Quaestion. et de Natura deorum lib. I. Sicut et Lucianus in Dialogo (continues)

Of the Egyptians. Not only by the writers of Christian philosophy but by the prophets too the superstition of the Egyptians is ill spoken of. Of the animals worshipped as gods by the Egyptians no one has written more fully than Herodotus in Euterpe. See also Philostratus, Life of Apollonius book VI, and Athenaeus [printed "Artheneum"] in the seventh book. Cicero too mentions it in the fifth book of the Tusculan Disputations and in On the Nature of the Gods book I. As does Lucian too in the Dialogue (continues)

(printed under page 323)

Page

  • running head: 619 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. (cut off at the image edge; the final letters of LACTANTII are damaged)
  • marginal letters: A ‹etiam miseri, quod non similes›; B ‹ad sacrificium. Ipsisne, quos cogunt›; C (beside the notes, ‹recitat legem 12 Tabularum›); D (beside the notes, ‹expostulentur. Ita etsi nos›)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: right-hand column (620) is cut off at the image edge and not set; the Variorum Notae at the page foot are not set; last word exprimi- is broken across the column break (exprimitur); "Digitized by" watermark ignored; UNSURE: "hoc" in "Recte hoc quidem" looks like "boc" on the page, probably an h with a damaged ascender, set as hoc
  • other: the word exprimitur was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 620
PL 6:620
invito. Nisi enim sponte atque ex animo fiat, execratio est; cum homines proscriptione, injuriis, carcere, tormentis adacti faciunt. Si dii sunt isti, qui sic coluntur, vel propter hoc solum colendi non sunt, quod sic coli volunt; digni scilicet detestatione hominum, quibus cum lacrymis, cum gemitu, cum sanguine de membris omnibus fluente libatur.
from one unwilling. For unless it is done willingly and from the heart, it is a curse, when men do it driven by proscription, injuries, prison and tortures. If those who are worshipped in this way are gods, even for this reason alone they ought not to be worshipped, that they wish to be worshipped in this way. They are, of course, worthy of the detestation of men, since offerings are poured to them with tears, with groaning, with blood flowing from all the limbs.
At nos contra non expetimus, ut Deum nostrum, qui est omnium, velit, nolit, colat aliquis invitus; nec, si non coluerit, irascimur. Confidimus enim majestati ejus, qui tam contemptum sui possit ulcisci, quam etiam servorum suorum labores et injurias. Et ideo cum tam nefanda perpetimur, ne verbo quidem reluctamur: sed Deo remittimus ultionem; non ut ii faciunt, qui defensores deorum suorum videri volunt, et saeviunt efferate adversus non colentes. Ex quo intelligi datur, quam non sit bonum deos colere; quoniam bono potius adducendi homines ad bonum fuerant, non malo. Sed quia illud malum est, etiam officium ejus bono caret. At enim puniendi sunt qui destruunt religiones. Num pejus nos destruimus, quam natio Aegyptiorum, qui turpissimas bestiarum ac pecudum figuras colunt,
We, on the contrary, do not demand that anyone should worship our God, Who is [the God] of all, whether he will or not, against his will; nor, if he has not worshipped Him, are we angry. For we trust in the majesty of Him Who is able to avenge contempt of Himself just as He can also avenge the labours and injuries of His servants. And therefore, when we suffer such abominable things, we do not resist even by a word, but we leave vengeance to God; not as those men do who wish to be seen as defenders of their gods, and rage savagely against those who do not worship them. From this it may be understood how far from good it is to worship the gods, since men ought to have been led to the good by good rather than by evil. But because that thing is evil, its service too is devoid of good. "But those who destroy religions must be punished." Do we destroy them worse than the nation of the Egyptians, who worship the most shameful figures of beasts and cattle,
Editors' notes and page, col. 620

Page

  • running head: LACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 620 (first letters cut off at the image edge; numeral blurred, reads like 820)
  • marginal letters: A ‹tur invito. Nisi enim›; B ‹deri volunt, et saeviunt›; C ‹Lips., 2 Colbert., aliique› (in the notes); D ‹peratores, haec faciunt› (in the notes)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "tur", the end of a word broken from col. 619; ends with "co-" broken into the next column (colunt?). "omnium" has damaged type (looks like omniûm); "turpissimas" blurred (could read tuspissimas), set as turpissimas. Full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE." below the text, cut off at the left edge, not set; the Variorum notes below it (Velit, nolit; Quam etiam; Labores; Ne verbo quidem; Sed Deo remittimus; Qui defensores; Efferate; Num pejus; Aegyptiorum) are left for the later pass.
PL 6:621
quaedam etiam pudenda dictu tanquam deos adorant? Num pejus quam iidem ipsi? qui, cum deos colere se dicant, tamen eos publice turpiterque derident; de quibus etiam mimos agi cum risu et voluptate patiuntur. Qualis haec religio aut quanta majestas putanda, quae adoratur in templis, illuditur in theatris? Et qui haec fecerint non poenas violati numinis pendunt, sed honorati etiam laudatique discedunt. Num
and even adore as gods certain things shameful to mention? Is it worse than these same men themselves, who, though they say that they worship the gods, nevertheless deride them publicly and shamefully, and even allow mimes to be acted about them with laughter and pleasure? What sort of religion is this, or how great a majesty must that be thought, which is adored in the temples and mocked in the theatres? And those who have done these things do not pay the penalty for an outraged deity, but even depart honoured and praised. Do
Editors' notes and page, col. 621

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> <!-- Q3b: the first lines of col 621's notes (the tail of the note carried over from page 323, and the lemma "Qui turpissimas bestiarum ac pecudum figuras colunt" with its first line) were completed from the column image c621_1; notes renumbered in print order. CROP WARNING (still open): the first line(s) of col 622's notes lie above the foot crop and were NOT seen; re-render or read c622's column images to complete note (2). --> (printed under page 324)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page: Aegyptiorum)› · col 621

(continued) de Sacrificiis. Videndus est etiam Euseb. lib. II de Praeparat. Evangel. cap. I.

(printed under page 324)

(2) ‹anchor: Qui turpissimas bestiarum ac pecudum figuras colunt› · col 621

Qui turpissimas bestiarum ac pecudum figuras colunt. Qui geminus ab Aegyptiis cultus, alter Mnevis nuncupatus, et ab Heliopolitanis; alter Apis, et a Memphitis pro numine habitus. Sic Plutarchus in lib. de Iside et Osiride. Apim intelligit Tibullus, cum lib. I Eleg. 7 ait: Te canit, atque suum proles miratur Osirim / Barbara, Memphitem plangere docta bovem. Nam διακριτικῶς eum appellat Memphitem bovem, ab illo qui Mnevis nomine Heliopoli colebatur diversum. De Api etiam Cicero, lib. I de Natura deorum: Quid igitur censes? Apim illum, sanctum Aegyptiorum bovem, nonne deum videri Aegyptiis? Uti Plinius lib. VIII, c. 46: Bos in Aegypto etiam numinis vice colitur; Apim vocant. Et paulo post: Sunt delubra ei gemina, quae vocant thalamos, auguria populorum. Alterum intrasse laetum est; in altero dira portendit. Et Clemens Pseudo-Romanus lib. V Recognitionum: Alii Aegyptiorum bovem, qui Apis dicitur, colendum tradidere. Apidis etiam meminere Clemens Alexandrinus, Admonitione ad gentes; Mela, de Situ Orbis, lib. I cap. 19: Solinus, cap. 35; Lucianus in Concilio Deorum, et de Sacrific.; Spartian. in Hadriano: Diodor. Sicul. lib. I; Aelianus, de Animal. lib. XI, cap. 10, et aliis. Sub bove autem Aegyptii solem colebant. Macrobius lib. I, cap. 21: Taurum vero ad solem referri, multiplici ratione Aegyptius cultus ostendit: vel quia apud Heliopolim taurum Soli consecratum, quem Neton cognominant, maxime colunt; vel quia bos Apis in civitate Memphi Solis instar excipitur. Ubi pro Neton, legendum censeo Mnevim, uti ab aliis vocatur; quae haud dubie vera est lectio. Haec cum scripsissem, incidi forte in locum Cl. Seldeni Syntag. I, de Diis Syris, ubi video jam ab eo monitum, Mnevim apud Macrobium reponendum esse. Aelianus autem lib. XI Histor. Animalium, cap. 11 ait, Apim non solis, sed lunae symbolum fuisse; et, ut Heliopolitani bovem suum soli, ita Memphitas suum lunae consecrasse. Ab hoc Aegyptiorum Apide veterum quidam volunt originem traxisse vitulum illum aureum, quem Israelitae sibi in deserto erigebant, colebantque. Sic Lactantius lib. IV, cap. 10: In luxuriam prolapsi, ad profanos Aegyptiorum ritus animos transtulerunt. Cum enim Moyses dux eorum ascendisset in montem, atque ibidem quadraginta dies moraretur, aureum caput Bovis, quem vocant Apin, quod eos in signo praecederet, figurarunt. Idem et tradit de Jeroboami vitulis, de quibus I sive III Regum, cap. XII, 28. D. Ambrosius, sive alius quis in Epist. Roman., cap. I. Idem etiam de utrisque sentit D. Hieronymus ad cap. IV Hoseae: Videtur, inquit, idcirco mihi populus Israel in solitudine fecisse sibi vituli caput quod coleret, Jeroboam filius Nabat vitulos aureos fabricatus, ut quod in Aegypto didicerant, Ἆπιν καὶ Μνεῦιν, qui sub figura boum coluntur, esse deos, hoc in sua superstitione servarent. Scimus tamen, quorumdam animantium cultum universis Aegyptiis communem fuisse, quorumdam etiam quibusdam tantum civitatibus observatum. De singulis quaedam subjiciemus. Post bovem, de cujus cultu jam diximus, addit Strabo, canem. De hujus (continued on col 622) […not seen…] aut felem, aut canem, aut crocodilum violent. Meminit et canis venerationis libro I de Legib; item Plutarchus in lib. de Iside et Osiride; et Juvenalis, satyra 15: Illic / Oppida tota canem venerantur, nemo Dianam. Clemens etiam Alexandrinus προτρεπτ. qui et indicat, canem praecipue a Cynopolitanis cultum. Κυνοπολῖται δὲ (σέβουσι) κύνα. De canis cultu etiam Herodotus in Euterpe, et Diodorus Siculus l. II, qui et addunt Aegyptios, in quorum domibus canis moreretur, solitos fuisse ad luctum indicandum, totum corpus radere. Felem quoque summo cultu sunt venerati; de quo cum Herodoto et Plutarcho, vide Ciceronem lib. I de Legibus, Tusculanar. Quaestion. lib. V, num. 78, et libro I de Natura deorum: Ne fando quidem auditum est, crocodilum, aut ibim, aut felem violatum ab Aegyptio. Juvenalis quoque satyra 15: Illic aeluros, hic piscem fluminis.... / .......... venerantur. Sic enim ibi legendum, non caeruleos, ut est in vulgatis, optime monuit Brodaeus Miscellan. lib. VII, cap. II. Diodorus etiam Siculus Bibliothecae Historicae lib. I, causam hujus cultus adducit; quia felis contra aspidum aliorumque serpentium morsus utilis est. Felis quoque cultus meminit Plutarchus Symposiacon, lib. IV, quaest. 5. Et Clemens Pseudo-Romanus lib. V Recognit., loco ex parte superius jam allato: Alii Aegyptiorum bovem, qui Apis dicitur, colendum tradidere, alii hircum, alii gattas. Per gattas enim plane feles, sive aeluros designat. Sic enim tum temporis locuti sunt, et gattas, vel cattas, feles appellabant. Unde in Gloss. Catta. αἴλουρος. Et aliae: κάττα, Catta. Sic Callimachi Scholiastes ait αἰλούρους, sive feles, κάττας ἰδιωτικῶς nominatas fuisse. Item Evagrius lib. VI, cap. 24: Catti voce etiam utitur auctor Historiae Barlaami, ubi de Aegyptiorum superstitionibus agit: Quidam, inquit, illorum coluerunt ovem, quidam hircum, alii vitulum, et porcum, nonnulli corvum et accipitrem, et vulturem, et aquilam. Alii vero crocodilum, quidam cattum, et canem, et lupum, et simiam, et draconem; et aspidem: alii cepas, et allia, et spinas. Porro apud Herodotum libro dicto legimus, Aegyptios ob felis mortem, non, ut in morte canis totum rasisse corpus, sed tantum supercilia. Addit deinde, feles mortuas saliri solitas atque ita Bubastim deferri, ubi sepeliebantur.

Who worship the foulest shapes of beasts and cattle. A twin bull was worshipped by the Egyptians: one called Mnevis, by the people of Heliopolis; the other Apis, held as a deity by the people of Memphis. So Plutarch in the book On Isis and Osiris. Tibullus means Apis when he says, Elegies book I, 7: "You the barbarian race sings and marvels at as its own Osiris, the race taught to mourn the bull of Memphis." For he calls him, distinguishingly, "the Memphite bull," as different from the one worshipped at Heliopolis under the name of Mnevis. Of Apis Cicero too, On the Nature of the Gods book I: "What then do you think? Does not that Apis, the holy bull of the Egyptians, seem a god to the Egyptians?" As Pliny, book VIII, ch. 46: "In Egypt an ox is even worshipped as a deity; they call him Apis." And a little after: "He has twin shrines, which they call chambers, the auguries of the peoples. To have entered the one is joyful; in the other he portends dire things." And the pseudo-Roman Clement, Recognitions book V: "Others of the Egyptians have handed down that the ox called Apis is to be worshipped." Apis is also mentioned by Clement of Alexandria in the Exhortation to the Nations; Mela, On the Situation of the World, book I, ch. 19; Solinus, ch. 35; Lucian in the Council of the Gods and On Sacrifices; Spartian in the Hadrian; Diodorus Siculus book I; Aelian, On Animals book XI, ch. 10; and others. Under the bull, moreover, the Egyptians worshipped the sun. Macrobius book I, ch. 21: "That the bull is referred to the sun the Egyptian cult shows in many ways: either because at Heliopolis they especially worship a bull consecrated to the Sun, whom they surname Neton; or because the ox Apis is received in the city of Memphis as an image of the Sun." Where for Neton I judge one should read Mnevis, as he is called by others; which is no doubt the true reading. When I had written this, I chanced on a passage of the distinguished Selden, Syntagma I, On the Syrian Gods, where I see he had already advised that Mnevis be restored in Macrobius. Aelian, moreover, History of Animals book XI, ch. 11, says that Apis was a symbol not of the sun but of the moon; and that, as the Heliopolitans consecrated their bull to the sun, so the Memphites consecrated theirs to the moon. Some of the ancients hold that the golden calf which the Israelites set up and worshipped in the desert took its origin from this Apis of the Egyptians. So Lactantius, book IV, ch. 10: "Having slid into luxury, they turned their minds to the profane rites of the Egyptians. For when Moses their leader had gone up the mountain and stayed there forty days, they fashioned a golden head of the ox they call Apis, to go before them as a standard." He relates the same of the calves of Jeroboam, of which 1 or 3 Kings, ch. 12:28. St Ambrose, or someone else, on the Epistle to the Romans, ch. 1. St Jerome thinks the same of both, on Hosea ch. 4: "It seems to me," he says, "that the people of Israel made themselves in the wilderness a calf's head to worship, and Jeroboam son of Nebat fashioned golden calves, for this reason: that what they had learned in Egypt, that Apis and Mnevis, who are worshipped under the figure of oxen, are gods, they might keep in their superstition." We know, however, that the cult of some animals was common to all the Egyptians, and that of others was observed only in certain cities. We shall add something on each. After the ox, of whose cult we have spoken, Strabo adds the dog. Of its [...not seen...] "or harm a cat, or a dog, or a crocodile." Cicero mentions the veneration of the dog too in On the Laws book I; so does Plutarch in On Isis and Osiris; and Juvenal, Satire 15: "There whole towns venerate the dog, none Diana." Clement of Alexandria too, in the Protrepticus, who also indicates that the dog was worshipped chiefly by the people of Cynopolis: "The Cynopolitans (worship) the dog." On the cult of the dog also Herodotus in Euterpe, and Diodorus Siculus book II, who add that the Egyptians in whose houses a dog died were wont to shave their whole body to show mourning. They venerated the cat too with the highest worship; on which, with Herodotus and Plutarch, see Cicero, On the Laws book I, Tusculan Disputations book V, no. 78, and On the Nature of the Gods book I: "It has never even been heard tell that a crocodile, or an ibis, or a cat was harmed by an Egyptian." Juvenal too, Satire 15: "There cats, here the fish of the river... they venerate." For so it should be read there, not caeruleos, as in the common editions, as Brodaeus excellently advised, Miscellanies book VII, ch. II. Diodorus Siculus too, Historical Library book I, gives the reason for this cult: because the cat is useful against the bites of asps and other serpents. Plutarch also mentions the cult of the cat, Table Talk book IV, question 5. And the pseudo-Roman Clement, Recognitions book V, in the passage already partly cited above: "Others of the Egyptians have handed down that the ox called Apis is to be worshipped, others the he-goat, others cats (gattas)." By gattas he plainly means cats, or ailouroi. For so they spoke at that time, and called cats gattae or cattae. Hence in the Glossaries: Catta, αἴλουρος. And others: κάττα, Catta. So the scholiast of Callimachus says that ailouroi, or cats, were colloquially called κάτται. Likewise Evagrius, book VI, ch. 24. The author of the History of Barlaam also uses the word cattus, where he treats of the superstitions of the Egyptians: "Some of them," he says, "worshipped the sheep, some the he-goat, others the calf and the pig, some the raven and the hawk, the vulture and the eagle. Others the crocodile, some the cat, and the dog, and the wolf, and the ape, and the dragon; and the asp: others onions, and garlic, and thorns." Further, in Herodotus, in the book mentioned, we read that the Egyptians, at the death of a cat, did not shave the whole body as at the death of a dog, but only the eyebrows. He adds next that dead cats were usually salted and so carried to Bubastis, where they were buried.

(printed under page 324)

(3) ‹anchor: De quibus etiam mimos agi› · col 622

De quibus etiam mimos agi. Ita cum 4 editis omnes prope mss. In 2 Reg. rec., 1 Colb. a secunda manu, Cant. et 11 vulgatis est per mimos agi. — Mimos agi. Mimi hic non sunt ipsi actores, sed fabulae; et nota phrasis mimos agere, restituta quoque a me in Epit., c. 55. De re ipsa Augustinus de Civ. Dei, l. IV, c. 26: In ludis scenicis... numinum crimina frequentantur. BUN.

About whom mimes are even performed. So nearly all the manuscripts, with 4 editions. In 2 recent Royal, 1 Colbert in the second hand, Cambridge and 11 common editions is per mimos agi. — Mimes are performed. The mimes here are not the actors themselves but the plays; and the phrase mimos agere is well known, restored by me also in the Epitome, ch. 55. On the matter itself Augustine, City of God book IV, ch. 26: "In the stage plays... the crimes of the gods are constantly shown." BÜNEMANN.

(printed under page 324)

(4) ‹anchor: Sponte esse nata› · col 622

Sponte esse nata. Sic veteres editi saeculi XV, alii multi omittunt esse.

To have been born of themselves. So the old editions of the fifteenth century; many others omit esse.

(printed under page 324)

(5) ‹anchor: Fortuitu› · col 622

Fortuitu. Ita meliores et maximo numero mss. inter quos 6 Regii et 4 Colb. et editi. Scripti 9 quorum (continues)

By chance. So the better manuscripts, in very great number, among them 6 Royal and 4 Colbert, and the editions. 9 manuscripts, of which (continues)

(printed under page 324)

Page

  • running head: 621 LIBER V. DE JUSTIT[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹lunt, quaedam etiam pudenda›; B, C, D stand beside the Variorum Notae below the text block (not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "lunt", the end of "colunt" broken from the previous column; column ends mid-sentence at "Num". The full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTA[E]", cut off at the edge, stands below the text block and is not set. The Variorum Notae beneath it (beginning "de Sacrificiis. Videndus est etiam Euseb." and running to "De hujus") are the editors' commentary at the page foot, left for the later pass.
PL 6:622
pejus nos destruimus, quam quidam philosophi, qui omnino nullos deos esse aiunt : sed omnia sua sponte esse nata, omnia fortuitu fieri quae geruntur? Num pejus quam Epicurei, qui esse quidem deos, sed curare quidquam negant; neque irasci eos, neque gratia commoveri? Quibus dictis utique persuadent, colendos omnino non esse; siquidem nec colentes respiciunt, neque non colentibus irascuntur. Praeterea
we destroy [religion] more wickedly than certain philosophers, who say that there are no gods at all, but that all things were born of their own accord, and that all things which are done happen by chance? Do we [destroy it] more wickedly than the Epicureans, who say that gods indeed exist, but deny that they care about anything, and [say] that they are neither angered nor moved by favour? By these sayings they certainly persuade [men] that they are not to be worshipped at all, since they neither regard those who worship them nor are angry with those who do not worship them. Besides,
Editors' notes and page, col. 622

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left] V. DE JUSTITIA. 622 (column number printed indistinctly, looks like "022")
  • marginal letters: A pejus nos destruimus; B tionis libro I de Legib (in the Variorum Notae); C Sic enim ibi legendum (in the Variorum Notae); D vum et accipitrem (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-word with "Praeter-" (continued in col. 623); the full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" across both columns, cut off at left, not set; the Variorum Notae below it (veneratione quoque Cicero ... Scripti 9 quorum) are the editors' commentary at the page foot, left for the later pass; running head cut off at the image's left edge
  • Q5b, for n621 note (2) (its CROP WARNING): the unseen opening of col 622's foot, read from image c622_1, is the single line plus quotation that follows "De hujus" at the foot of col 621, as printed: "veneratione quoque Cicero lib. V Tuscul. Quaest.: Aegyptiorum morem quis ignorat? quorum imbutae mentes pravitatis erroribus, quamvis carnificinam prius subierint, quam ibim, aut aspidem," which runs straight into n621's "aut felem, aut canem, aut crocodilum violent." English for the gap: "veneration Cicero too speaks of, Tusculan Disputations book V: 'Who does not know the custom of the Egyptians? Their minds are so steeped in depraved errors that they would undergo torture sooner than harm an ibis, or an asp,'" running into n621's "or a cat, or a dog, or a crocodile." Fold this into n621 (2) in place of "[…not seen…]" / "[...not seen...]"; the crop warning is then closed.
  • Q5b, also for n621 note (2), UNSURE: the col 622 foot prints "non cœruleos" (œ, to be read on the page at higher zoom); n621 sets "caeruleos". If it is œ, n621 should read "coeruleos".
PL 6:623
cum contra metus disserunt, nihil alind efficere conantur, quam ut nemo deos timeat. Et haec tamen ab hominibus et audiuntur libenter, et disseruntur impune.
when they discourse against fears, they attempt to bring about nothing else than that no one should fear the gods. And yet these things are both listened to gladly by men and discoursed upon with impunity.
CAPUT XXII.
Chapter XXII.
De furore daemonum in Christianos, et errore infidelium.
Of the fury of demons against Christians, and of the error of unbelievers.
Non ergo ideo adversus nos insaniunt, quia dii non coluntur a nobis: sed quia veritas penes nos est, quae (ut est verissime dictum) odium parit. Quid igitur existimabimus, nisi nescire illos quid patiantur? Pergitur enim caeco et irrationabili furore; quem nos videmus, illi nesciunt. Non enim ipsi homines persequuntur, qui causam cur irascantur innocentibus non habent: sed illi spiritus contaminati ac perditi, quibus veritas et nota est, et invisa, insinuant se mentibus eorum, et instigant nescios in furorem. Hi enim quamdiu pax est in populo Dei, fugitant justos, et pavent; et cum corpora hominum occupant, animasque divexant, adjurantur ab his, et nomine Dei veri fugantur. Quo audito tremunt, exclamant, et uri se verberarique testantur; et interroganti, qui sint quando venerint, quomodo in hominem irrepserint, confitentur. Sic extorti et excruciati virtute divini nominis, exsolantur. Propter haec verbera et minas, sanctos et justos viros semper oderunt. Et quia per se nocere his nihil possunt, publicis eos odiis persequuntur, quos sibi graves sentiunt; exercentque saevitiam quam violentissime possunt, ut aut eorum fidem minuant per dolorem, aut, si id efficere non
They do not, therefore, rage against us because the gods are not worshipped by us, but because the truth is with us, which (as has been most truly said) begets hatred. What, then, shall we think, except that they do not know what they are suffering? For they are driven on by a blind and irrational fury, which we see and they do not know. For it is not the men themselves who persecute, since they have no reason why they should be angry with the innocent, but those defiled and lost spirits, to whom the truth is both known and hateful, insinuate themselves into their minds and goad them, unknowing, into fury. For these, as long as there is peace among the people of God, shun the just and are afraid of them; and when they take possession of men's bodies and harass their souls, they are adjured by them and are put to flight by the name of the true God. On hearing it they tremble, cry out, and testify that they are being burned and scourged; and to the one questioning them they confess who they are, when they came, and how they crept into the man. Thus, wrenched out and tormented by the power of the divine name, they are driven into exile. On account of these scourgings and threats they always hate holy and just men. And because by themselves they can do no harm to them, they persecute with public hatred those whom they feel to be grievous to themselves; and they exercise cruelty as violently as they can, so that they may either diminish their faith through pain, or, if they cannot bring that about,
Editors' notes and page, col. 623

Footnotes

<!-- VARIORUM NOTAE: lemma-keyed notes without call marks; numbered here in print order; column = column of the page foot where the note is printed --> (printed under page 325)

(1) ‹anchor: (continued from previous page: Fortuitu)› · col 623

(continued) octo sunt recentissimi, habent fortuito. Sed fortuitu legitur apud ipsum Lactantium, lib. I cap. 2, lib. VII, cap. 9; apud Ciceronem Philipp. X, n. 2; X Attic. 6: lib. I Offic., n. 103, et II ad Her., 16.

(printed under page 325)

(2) ‹anchor: Contra metus› · col 623

Contra metus. Mss. 2 Reg. rec., 1 Colb., Brun. et edit. Betul. contra metum.

Against fears. 2 recent Royal manuscripts, 1 Colbert, Brun. and Betuleius's edition, contra metum.

(printed under page 325)

(3) ‹anchor: Dii non coluntur a nobis› · col 623

Dii non coluntur a nobis. Mss. 24 et editi 16. addunt, A multis enim non coluntur. Haec autem respuunt mss. antiquissimi 1 Reg., 2 Bonon., Tax., Navarr. Vict., 1 Sorbon., 1. Colbert.

The gods are not worshipped by us. 24 manuscripts and 16 editions add "For they are not worshipped by many." But the very old manuscripts 1 Royal, 2 Bologna, Tax., Navarre, Victor., 1 Sorbonne, 1 Colbert reject these words.

(printed under page 325)

(4) ‹anchor: Odium parit› · col 623

Odium parit. Terent. Andr., act. I, scen. 1.

Begets hatred. Terence, Andria, act I, scene 1.

(printed under page 325)

(5) ‹anchor: Quid patiantur› · col 623

Quid patiantur. Mss. Jun., Ultr., 1 Colb. et editi 4, qui patiuntur?

What they suffer. The Junius, Utrecht, 1 Colbert manuscripts and 4 editions, qui patiuntur?

(printed under page 325)

(6) ‹anchor: Pergitur enim caeco et irrationabili furore› · col 623

Pergitur enim caeco et irrationabili furore. Ita restitui ex mss. Regio-Put., 2 al. Reg. 6 Colb., Jun. aliisque undecim, necnon ex edit. 3 vet. Rom. et 5 al. In 2 Reg. scriptum est, Feruntur enim caeco, etc. In 1 Reg. rec. et 8 impressis, Perciti enim perferuntur caeco, etc.

For they go on with blind and irrational fury. So I have restored from the Regio-Puteanus manuscript, 2 other Royal, 6 Colbert, Junius and eleven others, and also from 3 old Rome editions and 5 others. In 2 Royal it is written "For they are borne with blind," etc. In 1 recent Royal and 8 printed, "For, roused, they are carried away with blind," etc.

(printed under page 325)

(7) ‹anchor: Spiritus contaminati› · col 623

Spiritus contaminati. Vide supra libro II, capit. 16.

Defiled spirits. See above, book II, ch. 16.

(printed under page 325)

(8) ‹anchor: Animasque divexant› · col 623

Animasque divexant. Sic antiquiores et potiores mss. ac 7 editi, et Lactantius l. VII, c. 15. In mss. rec. 3 Reg., 3 Colb., 5 Oxon. et 5 aliis ac 6 vulgatis est diu vexant.

And torment their souls. So the older and better manuscripts and 7 editions, and Lactantius, book VII, ch. 15. In the recent manuscripts 3 Royal, 3 Colbert, 5 Oxford and 5 others, and 6 common editions, is diu vexant (torment long).

(printed under page 325)

(9) ‹anchor: Quo audito tremunt, exclamant› · col 623

Quo audito tremunt, exclamant, etc. Prudent. Apotheos. torquetur Apollo / Nomine percussus Christi, nec fulmina verbi / Ferre potest: agitant miserum tot verbera linguae, / Quot laudata Dei resonant miracula Christi.

At hearing it they tremble, they cry out, etc. Prudentius, Apotheosis: "Apollo is tortured, struck by the name of Christ, and cannot bear the thunderbolts of the Word: as many lashes of the tongue harry the wretch as the praised miracles of Christ, God, resound."

(printed under page 325)

(10) ‹anchor: Excruciati virtute divini nominis, exsolantur› · col 623

Excruciati virtute divini nominis, exsolantur. Sic lego cum mss. 3 Reg. quorum unus est antiquissimus, 2 Colb., 1 Brun. Accedunt Cauc., 1 Reg., 3 (continued on col 624) Colbert. qui referunt, exulantur; 2 Reg. et Jun., expelluntur; 1 Reg. exultantur; 1 Reg. et Marm., exultant; quid pejus dici potest? 1 Reg. rec. alter Brun. et 18 edit., exulant. Forte legendum, exululant. Lactantius enim libro II, de Origine erroris, cap. 16, ait: Nec Deo per quem adjurantur... mentiri possunt. Itaque, maximis saepe ululatibus editis, verberari se, et ardere, et jam jamque exire proclamant. Proclive esset emendare ejulant, si concurrerent mss. Hoc enim verbum memini me legere apud priscos Patres, cum agunt de exorcismorum virtute: inter eos Cyprianus, de Idolorum Vanit.: Daemones tamen adjurati per Deum verum nobis statim cedunt, et fatentur, et de obsessis corporibus exire coguntur. Videas illos nostra voce et oratione occulte flagellis caedi, igni torqueri, incremento poenae propagantis extendi, ejulare, gemere, etc.

Tortured by the power of the divine name, they are driven out. So I read with 3 Royal manuscripts, one of them very old, 2 Colbert, 1 Brun. To these add Cauc., 1 Royal, 3 Colbert, which give exulantur; 2 Royal and Junius, expelluntur; 1 Royal, exultantur; 1 Royal and Marm., exultant (they exult): what could be said worse? 1 recent Royal, the other Brun. and 18 editions, exulant. Perhaps one should read exululant (they howl out). For Lactantius, book II, On the Origin of Error, ch. 16, says: "Nor can they lie to God, by whom they are adjured... So, often uttering the loudest howls, they cry out that they are being beaten and are burning, and are on the very point of going out." It would be easy to emend to ejulant (they wail), if the manuscripts agreed. For I remember reading this verb in the early Fathers when they treat of the power of exorcisms: among them Cyprian, On the Vanity of Idols: "Yet the demons, adjured by the true God, at once yield to us, and confess, and are compelled to go out of the bodies they possess. You may see them, at our voice and prayer, beaten with hidden scourges, tortured with fire, stretched out by the increase of a lengthening punishment, wailing, groaning," etc.

(printed under page 325)

(11) ‹anchor: Quae tota non in corpore› · col 624

Quae tota non in corpore, etc. Reposui tota ex 12 excusis, omnibusque mss. quod fuerat neglectum in 1 Bonon. antiq. et nonnullis editis.

Which is wholly not in the body, etc. I have restored tota from 12 printed and all the manuscripts; it had been neglected in 1 old Bologna and some editions.

(printed under page 325)

(12) ‹anchor: Quod quia oculis manuque tractabile est› · col 624

Quod quia oculis manuque tractabile est. Ita omnes ferme mss. et octo editi. Scripti rec. Reg., 1 Colb., 2 Clarom. novemque vulgati post quod quia, addunt videtur oculis, sed perperam; quippe Lactantius etiam dixit oculis contrectari lib. de Opificio, cap. 1. Vide not. ibidem; et lib. II Div. Inst. cap. 6, contemplatione contrectent.

Which, because it can be handled by eyes and hand. So nearly all the manuscripts and eight editions. Recent Royal manuscripts, 1 Colbert, 2 Clermont and nine common editions add videtur oculis after quod quia, but wrongly; for Lactantius also said "to be handled by the eyes" in the book On the Workmanship of God, ch. 1. See the note there; and Divine Institutes book II, ch. 6, "handle by contemplation."

(printed under page 325)

(13) ‹anchor: Inspici possunt› · col 624

Inspici possunt. Mss. 10 rec. et 9 edit., aspici.

Can be looked into. 10 recent manuscripts and 9 editions, aspici.

(printed under page 325)

(14) ‹anchor: Universas virtutis species› · col 624

Universas virtutis species. Scripti 6 rec. totidemque impressi ferunt, virtutum; Brun. omnes virtutum species. (Vide infra col. 625, lin. 3.)

All the forms of virtue. 6 recent manuscripts and as many printed bear virtutum; Brun., omnes virtutum species. (See below, col. 625, line 3.)

(printed under page 325)

(15) ‹anchor: Ab illis bonis abhorrere› · col 624

Ab illis bonis abhorrere. Mss. Cauc. et 2 Reg. et octo editi interponunt omnibus. (Vide infra col. 625 lin. 5.)

To shrink from those goods. The Cauc. manuscript and 2 Royal and eight editions insert omnibus. (See below, col. 625, line 5.)

(printed under page 325)

Page

  • running head: 623 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. (cut off at the right edge)
  • marginal letters: A ea cum contra metus disserunt; B habent: sed illi spiritus contaminati; C fidem minuant per dolorem; D tui ex mss. Regio-Put. (in the notes at the page foot)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: heading printed "CAPUT XXII," with a mark after it, set as CAPUT XXII.; damaged type read as adversus (printed like "adyersus"), existimabimus, videmus; exsolantur kept as printed (the editors' note defends this reading); full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" (cut off) above the page-foot notes not set; the Variorum notes at the foot are left for a later pass
PL 6:624
quiverint, auferant omnino de terra, ne sint qui possint eorum nequitiam coercere. Non me fugit quid responderi e contrario possit. Cur ergo Deus ille singularis, ille magnus, quem rerum potentem, quem dominum omnium confiteris, haec fieri patitur; nec cultores suos aut vindicat, aut tuetur? Cur denique qui eum non colunt, et opulenti, et potentes, et beati sunt, et honoribus regnoque potiuntur; eosque ipsos ditioni suae ac potestati subjectos habent?
they may remove them entirely from the earth, so that there may be none who can restrain their wickedness. It does not escape me what may be answered to the contrary. Why then does that singular God, that great God, Whom you confess to be powerful over all things, Whom you confess to be Lord of all, suffer these things to be done, and neither avenges nor protects His worshippers? Why, finally, are those who do not worship Him both wealthy and powerful and blessed, and in possession of honours and kingship, and why do they hold those very [worshippers] subject to their dominion and power?
Reddenda et hujus rei ratio est, ne quid remaneat erroris. Nam in primis haec causa est cur existimetur religio Dei vim non habere, quod inducuntur homines specie terrenorum ac praesentium bonorum, quae ad curam mentis nullo modo pertinent: quibus quia carere justos vident, et affluere injustos, et Dei cultum inanem arbitrantur, in quo inesse illa non cernunt, et deorum ritus aestimant veros, quoniam cultores eorum, et divitiis, et honoribus, et regnis fruantur. Verum ii qui sunt in hac existimatione, non perspiciunt altius vim rationemque hominis; quae tota non in corpore, sed in mente est. Nihil enim vident amplius, quam videtur, corpus scilicet; quod, quia oculis manuque tractabile est, imbecillum, fragile, mortale est; cujus sunt illa omnia bona, quae cupiditati, ac miraculo sunt, opes, honores, imperia, quoniam corpori afferunt voluptates; et ideo tam caduca sunt quam corpus ipsum. Animus vero, in quo solo est homo, quoniam subjectus oculis non est, nec bona ejus inspici possunt, quae in sola virtute sunt posita; et ideo tam stabilis, et constans, et perpetuus sit necesse est, sicut ipsa virtus, in qua est animi bonum.
An account of this matter too must be given, so that no error may remain. For in the first place this is the cause why the religion of God is thought to have no power: that men are led on by the appearance of earthly and present goods, which in no way pertain to the care of the mind. Because they see the just lacking these and the unjust abounding in them, they both judge the worship of God to be empty, since they do not perceive those things to be present in it, and they reckon the rites of the gods to be true, because their worshippers enjoy riches and honours and kingdoms. But those who hold this opinion do not look more deeply into the force and nature of man, which lies wholly not in the body but in the mind. For they see nothing more than what is seen, namely the body; which, because it can be handled by the eyes and the hand, is weak, fragile and mortal; and to it belong all those goods which are objects of desire and wonder, wealth, honours, dominions, since they bring pleasures to the body; and therefore they are as perishable as the body itself. But the soul, in which alone the man consists, since it is not subject to the eyes, neither can its goods be looked upon, which are placed in virtue alone; and therefore it must needs be as stable and constant and everlasting as virtue itself, in which the good of the soul lies.
Editors' notes and page, col. 624

Page

  • running head: [LA]CTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT. 624 (left edge cut off in the image)
  • marginal letters: A quiverint, auferant omnino; B tum inanem arbitrantur; C cesse est, sicut ipsa virtus; D voce et oratione occulte (in the Variorum notes at the page foot, not in the text block)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with "quiverint" (sentence starts in col. 623); "ne sint" printed with damaged type (looks like "siut") but read as sint; VARIORUM NOTAE at the page foot (from "Colbert. qui referunt" to "Ab illis bonis abhorrere") not set, left for the later pass; "fruantur" and "imbecillum" set as printed
PL 6:625
CAPUT XXIII.
Chapter XXIII.
De justitia et patientia Christianorum.
On the justice and patience of the Christians.
Longum est universas virtutis species promere, ut de singulis doceam quam necesse sit sapientem ac justum virum longe ab illis bonis abhorrere; quibus quia fruuntur injusti, deorum cultus veri et efficaces esse creduntur. Qu⟨o⟩d ad praesentem pertinet quaestionem, satis est si ex una virtute id probemus quod intendimus. Nempe magna et praecipua virtus est patientia, quam pariter et vulgi voces publicae, et philosophi, et oratores summis laudibus celebrant. Quod si negari non potest quin summa sit virtus, necesse est justum et sapientem virum in potestate esse hominis injusti, ut capiat patientiam. Patientia est enim malorum quae aut inferuntur, aut accidunt, cum aequanimitate perlatio. Ergo justus ac sapiens, quia virtutem capit, habet in se patientiam; qua carebit omnino, si nihil patietur adversi. Contra, qui in rebus prosperis agit, impatiens est, et virtute maxima caret. Impatientem dico, quia nihil patitur. Innocentiam quoque servare non potest, quae et ipsa justo et sapienti viro propria virtus est. Sed et nocet saepe, et concupiscit aliena, et rapit, quae cupierit, per injuriam; quia virtutis expers, vitio peccatoque subjectus est, et fragilitatis oblitus, animo insolenter elato tumet.
It would be a long task to set forth all the kinds of virtue, so as to show of each one how necessary it is that the wise and just man should shrink far away from those goods; and because the unjust enjoy them, the worship of the gods is believed to be true and effectual. As regards the present question, it is enough if we prove what we intend from a single virtue. Patience, namely, is a great and pre-eminent virtue, which alike the public voices of the common people, and the philosophers, and the orators celebrate with the highest praises. But if it cannot be denied that it is a supreme virtue, it is necessary that the just and wise man be in the power of the unjust man, so that he may take on patience. For patience is the bearing with equanimity of the evils which are either inflicted or befall. Therefore the just and wise man, because he takes on virtue, has patience in himself; which he will lack altogether if he suffers nothing adverse. On the other hand, he who lives in prosperous circumstances is impatient, and lacks the greatest virtue. I call him impatient because he suffers nothing. Nor can he preserve innocence, which is itself also a virtue proper to the just and wise man. But he often does harm too, and covets what belongs to others, and seizes by wrongdoing what he has coveted; because, being devoid of virtue, he is subject to vice and sin, and, forgetful of his frailty, he swells with an insolently exalted mind.
Inde injusti, ac Deum nescientes, et divitiis, et potentia, et honoribus florent. Haec enim cuncta injustitiae
Hence the unjust, and those who do not know God, flourish in riches, and power, and honours. For all these things of injustice
Editors' notes and page, col. 625

Footnotes

Heading: VARIORUM NOTAE. (Notes keyed by lemma, without call marks; numbered here in print order.) (printed under page 326)

(1) ‹lemma: Celebrant.› · no call; lemma note, col 625

Celebrant. Mss. 2 Reg. rec., Cant. et 4 edit. concelebrant; 1 al. Reg. rec. colebant. Bunemannus vero habet, summis laudibus concelebrant, et sic rationem reddit hujus lectionis variantis.—Ms. Cantabr. et vetus ed. Rom., concelebrant, quod aptius numero, cujus observantissimus noster est, quam vulgatum celebrant. Cell.

Celebrant ("they celebrate"). Two more recent Regius manuscripts, the Cambridge manuscript and four editions have concelebrant; one other more recent Regius has colebant ("they worshipped"). Bünemann, however, reads summis laudibus concelebrant ("they celebrate together with the highest praises"), and gives this account of the variant reading: the Cambridge manuscript and the old Roman edition have concelebrant, which suits the rhythm better (and our author is most observant of rhythm) than the common reading celebrant. Cellarius.

(printed under page 326)

(2) ‹lemma: Perlatio.› · no call; lemma note, col 625

Perlatio. Vox rara vel etiam nova. — Perlatio. Tolerantia. Hoc sensu Lactantius, quod sciam, primus dixit. Conf. not. ad lib. III, cap. 2; alios ensu lexicis ignoto Hyginus in praefat. lib. I. poet. Astron.: Uniuscujusque historias causamque ad sidera perlationis ostendimus. Bun.

Perlatio. A rare or even new word. — Perlatio means endurance. Lactantius, so far as I know, was the first to use it in this sense. Compare the note on Book III, chapter 2; Hyginus, in the preface to Book I of the Poetica Astronomica, uses it in another sense [printed "alios ensu", for "alio sensu"] unknown to the lexicons: "We set out the stories of each one and the cause of its being carried up to the stars." Bünemann.

(printed under page 326)

(3) ‹lemma: Non potest.› · no call; lemma note, col 625

Non potest. Id est, vix potest.

Non potest ("cannot"). That is, can scarcely.

(printed under page 326)

(4) ‹lemma: Vitio peccatoque subjectus.› · no call; lemma note, col 625

Vitio peccatoque subjectus. Post haec verba, mss. 2 Reg. quorum unus est antiquisimus, et Marm. sexque editi addunt, Domini affectat in liberos, quia temperantiam non habet.

Vitio peccatoque subjectus ("subject to vice and sin"). After these words two Regius manuscripts, one of which is very old [printed "antiquisimus"], the Marmoutier manuscript and six editions add: "he aims at lordship over free men, because he has no self-restraint."

(printed under page 326)

(5) ‹lemma: Subjectus est.› · no call; lemma note, col 625

Subjectus est. Cancellis inclusum quidam addunt, Dominari affectus in liberos, quia temperantiam non habet, frag. At exterminant illa verba libri Bon., Tax., Pen., Pal., Jun., Angl., Lips., Reimm. et editi ab anno 1645, 1524, et Gymn., Thomas., Isaeus, Gall., Spark., reliqui. Bun.

Subjectus est ("is subject"). Some add, enclosed in brackets, "aiming to lord it over free men, because he has no self-restraint," a fragment. But these words are banished by the Bologna, Tax., Pen., Palatine, Junius, English, Leipzig and Reimmann copies, and by the editions from 1645 and 1524, and the Gymnasium edition, Thomasius, Isaeus, Gallaeus, Sparke and the rest. Bünemann.

(printed under page 326)

(6) ‹lemma: Quia illa omnia humana.› · no call; lemma note, col 625

Quia illa omnia humana. In quamplurimis mss. et 7 vulgatis additur sunt, quod a vetustissimis mss. 3 et ab octo editis abest.

Quia illa omnia humana ("because all those things [are] human"). In very many manuscripts and seven printed editions sunt ("are") is added, which is absent from three very old manuscripts and from eight editions.

(printed under page 326)

(7) ‹lemma: Laelio.› · no call; lemma note, col 625

Laelio. Vide Cic. ut supra cap. 12, 18 et 19, ex tertio de Repub. — Quia illa omnia, (ut est a Laelio dictum), sua bona divina judicat. Aperte provocat ad Laelii verba, quae indicavit noster, c. 18: Huic tu viro (justo) quas divitias objicies?... Quae regna? Qui ista putat humana, sua bona divina judicat; et infra, Quae virtus, si bona sua divina judicat? Bun.

Laelio ("by Laelius"). See Cicero as above, chapters 12, 18 and 19, from the third book of the De republica. — "Because all those things (as Laelius said) he judges his goods divine." He openly appeals to the words of Laelius which our author pointed out in chapter 18: "What riches will you set before this man (the just man)?... What kingdoms? He who thinks those things human judges his own goods divine"; and below: "What virtue, if he judges his own goods divine?" Bünemann.

(printed under page 326)

(8) ‹lemma: Et eadem conditione.› · no call; lemma note, cols 625-626

Et eadem conditione. Reimm.: ab eodem Deo, eadem conditione, omisso, et. Goth., Angl., Rost., Ven. 1493, 97, Ald. et reliqui, et eadem conditione. L. v, c. 14: Deus, qui homines generat... eamdem conditionem vivendi omnibus posuit. Epitom., c. 59: Si nos idem Deus fecit, et universos... pari conditione generavit, fraterna... necessitudine cohaeremus. Bun.

Et eadem conditione ("and on the same terms"). Reimmann: "by the same God, on the same terms," with et omitted. The Gotha, English and Rostock copies, the Venice editions of 1493 and 1497, the Aldine and the rest: "and on the same terms." Book V, chapter 14: "God, who begets men... set the same terms of living for all." Epitome, chapter 59: "If the same God made us, and begot all... on equal terms, we are bound together by a brotherly... tie." Bünemann.

(printed under page 326)

(9) ‹lemma: Impertit.› · no call; lemma note, col 626

Impertit. 2 Colb. impartit; Jun. et 4 edit. impartitur.

Impertit ("imparts"). Two Colbert manuscripts have impartit; Junius and four editions impartitur.

(printed under page 326)

(10) ‹lemma: Eo accedit quod.› · no call; lemma note, col 626

Eo accedit quod. Sic reposui ex mss. 2 Reg. antiquissimis, Cauc, aliisque sex, et edit. 4. In 11 rec. est, Et accedit ex eo quod. In 2, rec. Reg. et 6 impressis, Et accedit ex eo quod; in 1 Bon. et 3 vulgatis Accedit quod. In 1 Reg. rec. Accedat quod.

Eo accedit quod ("to this is added that"). So I have restored it from two very old Regius manuscripts, the Cauc[ensis], six others and four editions. In eleven more recent ones it is Et accedit ex eo quod. In two more recent Regius and six printed editions, Et accedit ex eo quod; in one Bologna manuscript and three printed editions, Accedit quod. In one more recent Regius, Accedat quod.

(printed under page 326)

(11) ‹lemma: Libidinum victor.› · no call; lemma note, col 626

Libidinum victor. Hoc enim nomine Aristoteles continentiam patientia potiorem judicat, quod vincere praestantius est, quam resistere: sicut etiam praestantius est vincere, quam non vinci. Betuleius.

Libidinum victor ("conqueror of the passions"). For on this account Aristotle judges continence superior to endurance, because to conquer is more excellent than to resist, just as it is also more excellent to conquer than not to be conquered. Betuleius.

(printed under page 326)

(12) ‹lemma: Idem nihil tumoris.› · no call; lemma note, col 626

Idem nihil tumoris. Mss. 3 Reg. rec. Id. est, nihil tumoris; 1 Reg., Jun. et 4 vet. edit. et nihil tumoris; scripti 6 et 4 vulgati, timoris; male. Fit enim antithesis ad superiora, ubi dixerat, impatientem elato animo insolenter tumere.

Idem nihil tumoris ("likewise no swelling"). Three more recent Regius manuscripts: Id est, nihil tumoris; one Regius, Junius and four old editions: et nihil tumoris; six manuscripts and four printed editions: timoris ("of fear"), wrongly. For an antithesis is made to what precedes, where he had said that the impatient man swells insolently with an elated mind.

(printed under page 326)

(13) ‹lemma: Planus est.› · no call; lemma note, col 626

Planus est. Sic supra Lactantius eodem libro, cap. 15, ad finem, id est, humilis.

Planus est ("is level"). So Lactantius above, in the same book, chapter 15, at the end; that is, humble.

(printed under page 326)

(14) ‹lemma: Nec aliena cupiat.› · no call; lemma note, col 626

Nec aliena cupiat. Loquitur hic de justo et vere sapiente, sc. Christiano. Quid vero magni, si hic nihil rapiat? ne cupit quidem. Hinc de eodem dixit sup. Nec alienum quidquam concupiscit; et l. VI, c. 24: Nihil omnino appetat, nihil concupiscat alienum. Bun.

Nec aliena cupiat ("nor desires what is another's"). He speaks here of the just and truly wise man, that is, the Christian. What great thing is it, if such a man seizes nothing? He does not even desire it. Hence he said of the same man above: "Nor does he covet anything of another's"; and Book VI, chapter 24: "Let him seek nothing at all, covet nothing of another's." Bünemann.

(printed under page 326)

(15) ‹lemma: Et hic in servitutem abeat.› · no call; lemma note, col 626 (continues)

Et hic in servitutem abeat. Mss. 25 et edit. 3: Et hic in se virtutem habeat: sed contra mentem Lactantii, qui id solum efficere vult, virum bonum esse in potestate hominis injusti. Vide supra justum hominem subjectum esse injusto; et infra, idcirco enim (continues)

Et hic in servitutem abeat ("and this one goes off into servitude"). Twenty-five manuscripts and three editions: "and this one has virtue in himself"; but this is against Lactantius's meaning, who wishes to establish only this, that the good man is in the power of the unjust man. See above, "that the just man is subject to the unjust"; and below, "for on this account (continues)

(printed under page 326)

Page

  • running head: 625 LIBER V. DE JUSTITI (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹CAPUT XXIII.› (heading line); B ‹esse hominis injusti, ut capiat patientiam›; C ‹potentia, et honoribus florent›; D ‹editi addunt, Domini affectat› (in the Variorum Notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "Qu⟨o⟩d" has a damaged o; "summis" and "summa" printed with broken type but legible; last word "in-" hyphenated across the column break; the full-width heading "VARIORUM NOTAE" (cut off at the image edge) stands above the notes at the page foot and is not set; the Variorum Notae are not set (later pass); the right-hand column visible in the images belongs to col. 626 and is not set
PL 6:626
praemia sunt; quia et perpetua esse non possunt, et per cupiditatem violentiamque quaeruntur. Justus vero ac sapiens, quia illa omnia humana (ut est a Laelio dictum) sua bona, divina judicat, nec alienum quidquam concupiscit, ne quem contra jus humanitatis laedat omnino, nec ullam potentiam honoremve desiderat, ne cui faciat injuriam. Scit enim cunctos ab eodem Deo, et eadem conditione generatos, jure fraternitatis esse conjunctos. Sed et suo contentus, et parvo, quia fragilitatis suae memor, non amplius quaerit, quam unde vitam sustentet; et ex eo ipso, quod habuerit, impertit etiam non habenti, quia pius est: pietas autem summa virtus est. Eo accedit, quod voluptates caducas vitiosasque contemnit, quarum causa opes appetuntur; quoniam continens est, ac libidinum victor. Idem nihil tumoris atque insolentiae gerens, non extollit se altius, nec erigit superbum caput: sed placidus, et concors et comis, et planus est, quia conditionem suam novit. Cum ergo injuriam nulli faciat, nec aliena cupiat, nec sua quoque, si vi auferantur, defendat: cum sciat etiam illatam injuriam moderate ferre, quia virtute praeditus est: necesse est justum hominem subjectum esse injusto, et contumeliis affici ab insipiente sapientem, ut et ille peccet, quia injustus est, et hic in servitutem abeat, quia justus est.
are the rewards; because they both cannot be perpetual, and are sought through greed and violence. But the just and wise man, because he judges all those things to be human, and (as was said by Laelius) his own goods to be divine, neither covets anything belonging to another, lest he harm anyone at all against the law of humanity, nor desires any power or honour, lest he do injury to anyone. For he knows that all, begotten by the same God and in the same condition, are joined by the law of brotherhood. But being content also with his own, and with little, because he is mindful of his frailty, he seeks no more than that by which he may sustain life; and out of that very thing which he has, he imparts also to one who does not have, because he is pious: and piety is the highest virtue. To this is added that he despises transient and vicious pleasures, for the sake of which riches are sought; since he is continent, and a conqueror of lusts. The same man, bearing nothing of swelling pride and insolence, does not exalt himself higher, nor raise a proud head: but he is gentle, and harmonious, and courteous, and humble, because he knows his own condition. Since, therefore, he does injury to no one, nor desires the things of others, nor even defends his own if they are taken away by force: since he knows also how to bear moderately an injury inflicted on him, because he is endowed with virtue: it is necessary that the just man be subject to the unjust, and that the wise be afflicted with insults by the foolish, so that the one may sin, because he is unjust, and the other may go off into servitude, because he is just.
Si quis autem volet scire plenius, cur malos et injustos Deus potentes, beatos et divites fieri sinat; pios contra, humiles, miseros, inopes esse patiatur:
But if anyone will wish to know more fully why God allows the wicked and unjust to become powerful, happy and rich; but suffers the pious, on the contrary, to be lowly, wretched, needy:
Editors' notes and page, col. 626

Page

  • running head: V. DE JUSTITIA. 626 (left part of the head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A justitiae praemia sunt; B appetuntur; quoniam continens; C pios contra, humiles; D etiam praestantius est vincere (in the notes, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins and ends mid-sentence; the first word "justitiae" is complete. The full-width heading "[VA]RIORUM NOTAE" stands between the text and the notes, is cut off at the left edge, and is not set. The editors' variant notes (Variae lectiones) and the Commentarius (Bun., Betuleius) at the page foot are left for the later pass. The phrase "humana (ut est a Laelio dictum) sua bona, divina judicat" is construed as human / his own goods divine; this reading is UNSURE. "eádem" shows a stray accent-like speck, set as eadem.
PL 6:627
sumat eum Senecae librum cui titulus est: Quare bonis viris multa mala accidant, cum sit providentia; in quo ille multa, non plane imperitia saeculari, sed sapienter ac pene divinitus elocutus est. « Deus, inquit, homines pro liberis habet: sed corruptos et vitiosos luxuriose ac delicate patitur vivere, quia non putat emendatione sua dignos. Bonos autem, quos diligit, castigat saepius, et assiduis laboribus ad usum virtutis exercet; nec eos caducis ac mortalibus bonis corrumpi ac depravari sinit. » Unde nemini mirum debet videri, si pro nostris saepe delictis castigamur a Deo. Imo vero, cum vexamur ac premimur, tum maxime gratias agimus indulgentissimo patri; quod corruptelam nostram non patitur longius procedere, sed plagis ac verberibus emendat. Ex quo intelligimus esse nos Deo curae; quoniam, cum peccamus, irascitur. Nam cum posset populo suo, et opes, et regna largiri, sicut dederat ante Judaeis, quorum nos successores ac posteri sumus; idcirco enim voluit sub aliena ditione atque imperio degere, ne rerum prosperarum felicitate corruptus, in luxuriam laberetur, ac Dei praecepta contemneret, sicut illi majores nostri, qui saepe terrenis ac fragilibus his bonis enervati, aberrarunt a disciplina, et legis vincula
let him take up that book of Seneca whose title is: Why many evils befall good men, though there is a providence; in which he has said many things, not at all with worldly ignorance, but wisely and almost divinely. « God, he says, regards men as His children: but the corrupt and vicious He allows to live luxuriously and delicately, because He does not think them worthy of His correction. But the good, whom He loves, He chastises rather often, and trains them by constant labours to the practice of virtue; nor does He allow them to be corrupted and depraved by perishable and mortal goods. » Hence it ought to seem a wonder to no one if we are often chastised by God for our sins. Nay rather, when we are harassed and oppressed, then most of all we give thanks to our most indulgent Father, because He does not allow our corruption to proceed further, but corrects it with blows and stripes. From this we understand that we are a care to God, since, when we sin, He is angry. For though He could have bestowed both wealth and kingdoms on His people, as He had formerly given them to the Jews, whose successors and descendants we are, for this reason indeed He willed that it should live under another's dominion and rule, lest, corrupted by the happiness of prosperous circumstances, it should slip into luxury and despise the precepts of God, as did those forefathers of ours, who, often enervated by these earthly and fragile goods, strayed from discipline, and the bonds of the law
Editors' notes and page, col. 627

Footnotes

Heading: VARIORUM NOTAE. (Notes keyed by lemma, without call marks; numbered here in print order.) (printed under page 327)

(1) (continued) ‹lemma: Et hic in servitutem abeat. (from p. 326)› · no call; lemma note, col 627

(continued) voluit sub aliena ditione atque imperio degere... premi eos voluit ab iis in quorum manibus eos collocavit. At secundam lectionem admittit Buneman. et sic illam defendit: — Et hic in se virtutem habeat. Vix dixit: Necesse est justum hominem subjectum esse injusto, quorsum denuo: justum in servitutem abire, quia justus est. Contra, si legas, in se virtutem habeat, justa est oppositio inter peccatum et virtutem. Ergo justus ac sapiens, quia virtutem capit, Habet in se patientiam. Phrasis occurrit, l. V, c. 10: Quisquamne putet hunc aliquid in se virtutis habuisse?

(printed under page 327)

(2) ‹lemma: Quare bonis viris.› · no call; lemma note, col 627

Quare bonis viris. Abest viris a mss. Brun.

Quare bonis viris ("why to good men"). Viris ("men") is absent from the Brun[swick] manuscript.

(printed under page 327)

(3) ‹lemma: Deus, inquit, homines pro liberis habet.› · no call; lemma note, col 627

Deus, inquit, homines pro liberis habet. Haec ipsa verba haud certe reperias apud Senecam. Quare aut Senecae liber excidit, aut quasi Senecae verbis eam Lactantius extulit sententiam, ut et alibi factitat. Horum verborum sententiam habes in ejus libello de divina Providentia, sub initium. Isaeo.

Deus, inquit, homines pro liberis habet ("God, he says, holds men as his children"). These very words you will certainly not find in Seneca. So either a book of Seneca's is lost, or Lactantius set out the thought as though in Seneca's words, as he often does elsewhere. You have the sense of these words in his little book On Divine Providence, near the beginning. Isaeus.

(printed under page 327)

(4) ‹lemma: Castigat.› · no call; lemma note, col 627

Castigat. Vide Proverb. cap. III, v. 12; ad Hebraeos XII, v. 6; Apocal. III, v. 19.

Castigat ("chastises"). See Proverbs 3:12; Hebrews 12:6; Revelation 3:19.

(printed under page 327)

(5) ‹lemma: Unde nemini.› · no call; lemma note, col 627

Unde nemini. Ms. 1. Bonon. Nec mirum.

Unde nemini ("whence to no one"). One Bologna manuscript: Nec mirum ("nor is it surprising").

(printed under page 327)

(6) ‹lemma: Quum vexamur..... gratias agimus.› · no call; lemma note, col 627

Quum vexamur..... gratias agimus. Cyprianus de Lapsis, in principio: Quamvis agere gratias nostra vox nec in persecutione cessaverit. Adde notas ad Lact. l. VI, c. 25: Etiam in malis gratias agat. Bun.

Quum vexamur..... gratias agimus ("when we are harassed..... we give thanks"). Cyprian, On the Lapsed, at the beginning: "Although our voice did not cease to give thanks even in persecution." Add the notes on Lactantius Book VI, chapter 25: "Let him give thanks even in evils." Bünemann.

(printed under page 327)

(7) ‹lemma: Tum maxime gratias agimus.› · no call; lemma note, col 627

Tum maxime gratias agimus. Act. V, v. 12. Chrysost. Homil. 5, de Jobo: Qui amore Christi aduritur, eligeret potius vinctum esse pro Christo, qnam coelos inhabitare, clariusque hoc habebit, quam super duodecim sedes sedere, quamdiu voluntas Dei est, quod patiatur. Jo. Gerardi.

Tum maxime gratias agimus ("then above all we give thanks"). Acts 5:12. Chrysostom, Homily 5 on Job: "He who burns with the love of Christ would rather be bound for Christ than dwell in the heavens, and will count this more glorious than to sit upon the twelve thrones, so long as it is God's will that he suffer." John Gerhard.

(printed under page 327)

(8) ‹lemma: Quoniam, cum peccamus, irascitur.› · no call; lemma note, col 627

Quoniam, cum peccamus, irascitur. Ita scripti 9 rec. totidemque vulgati. At quibus cum peccamus, irascitur, habent mss. Cauc., Pal., 1 Lips., 1 Colb. et editi quidam. In 13 manu exaratis et 4 impressis, quibus, quoniam peccamus, irascitur. 1 Brun. pro quoniam habet quando.

Quoniam, cum peccamus, irascitur ("because, when we sin, he is angry"). So nine more recent manuscripts and as many printed editions. But the Cauc[ensis], Palatine, one Leipzig and one Colbert manuscript and some editions have quibus cum peccamus, irascitur. In thirteen handwritten copies and four printed: quibus, quoniam peccamus, irascitur. One Brunswick manuscript has quando ("when") for quoniam.

(printed under page 327)

(9) ‹lemma: Quorum nos successores ac posteri.› · no call; lemma note, cols 627-628

Quorum nos successores ac posteri. In locum enim Judaeorum a Deo reprobatorum gentiles insiti sunt tanquam surculi, quasi oleastri inserti in illis, et socii radicis et pinguedinis olivae facti, participantes eumdem spiritum fidei et gratiae, qui fuit in Abramo et veteribus Judaeorum patriarchis: sic a Christo suscitati sunt Abrahae filii, ejus habentes fidem, operaque facientes.

Quorum nos successores ac posteri ("whose successors and descendants we are"). For in place of the Jews rejected by God the Gentiles were grafted in like shoots, as wild olives grafted in among them, and made sharers of the root and fatness of the olive, partaking of the same spirit of faith and grace that was in Abraham and the ancient patriarchs of the Jews: thus sons of Abraham were raised up by Christ, having his faith and doing his works.

(printed under page 327)

(10) ‹lemma: Aberrarunt a disciplina, et legis vincula ruperunt.› · no call; lemma note, col 628

Aberrarunt a disciplina, et legis vincula ruperunt. Mss. 8, aberraverunt. 1. Reg. antiquissimus, pro et legis, habet et Dei. Alter veterrimus Reg. cum aliis 4 rec. aberrarunt a disciplina legis, vinculaque ruperunt; item 4 Reg. rec., 4 Colbert. et 5 impressi aberraverunt.

Aberrarunt a disciplina, et legis vincula ruperunt ("they strayed from discipline and broke the bonds of the law"). Eight manuscripts: aberraverunt. One very old Regius has et Dei ("and of God") for et legis. Another very old Regius with four more recent ones: "they strayed from the discipline of the law, and broke its bonds"; likewise four more recent Regius, four Colbert manuscripts and five printed editions have aberraverunt.

(printed under page 327)

(11) ‹lemma: Deo autem quia repugnari non potest.› · no call; lemma note, col 628

Deo autem quia repugnari non potest. Mss. 2 Reg. rec. et 2 Clarom. cui pro quia.

Deo autem quia repugnari non potest ("but because God cannot be resisted"). Two more recent Regius and two Clermont manuscripts have cui ("whom") for quia.

(printed under page 327)

(12) ‹lemma: Sed contra milites ejus.› · no call; lemma note, col 628

Sed contra milites ejus. Immo in militibus imperator, in membris caput violatur. Actor. IX: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? Rivet.

Sed contra milites ejus ("but against his soldiers"). Rather, in the soldiers the commander, in the members the head, is violated. Acts 9: "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?" Rivet.

(printed under page 327)

(13) ‹lemma: Pressurae verberibus.› · no call; lemma note, col 628

Pressurae verberibus. Ita restitui ex 1 Reg. antiquissimo, 7 al. Reg., 6 Colbert. aliisque decem, et editis 12. In 1 Bonon. antiq. est pressura verberibus; in Thys. et Gall. pressurae et verberibus, male. Deest pressurae, in Regio-Put. et forsan aptissime. — Pressurae verberibus. Pressura, vox nostro et patribus pro persecutione, calamitate, frequens. Conf. infra, persecutiones. Lact. l. IV, c. 26: Pressurarum nobis ac laborum et miseriarum praebebat exemplum. Lib. VII, c. 17: Erit pressura et contritio. Obiter hic observo, alibi esse magis reconditum usum hujus vocis, ubi medicis pressura notat somnum gravem, alias oppressionem. Bun.

Pressurae verberibus ("with the scourges of affliction"). So I have restored it from one very old Regius, seven other Regius, six Colbert and ten other manuscripts, and twelve editions. In one old Bologna manuscript it is pressura verberibus; in Thysius and Gallaeus pressurae et verberibus, wrongly. Pressurae is missing in the Regio-Puteanus, and perhaps most fittingly. — Pressurae verberibus. Pressura is a word frequent in our author and the Fathers for persecution or calamity. Compare below, persecutiones. Lactantius Book IV, chapter 26: "He gave us an example of afflictions and labours and miseries." Book VII, chapter 17: "There will be affliction and crushing." In passing I note here that elsewhere there is a more recondite use of this word, where among physicians pressura denotes heavy sleep, otherwise called oppression. Bünemann.

(printed under page 327)

(14) ‹lemma: Diffluentem.› · no call; lemma note, col 628

Diffluentem. Sic reposui ex edit. Cellar. et omnibus libris mss. praeter rec. 2 Reg., 2 Colb., 1 Clarom. et edd. in quibus est deffluentem.

Diffluentem ("flowing apart"). So I have restored it from Cellarius's edition and all the manuscript books except two more recent Regius, two Colbert, one Clermont, and the editions, in which it is deffluentem.

(printed under page 327)

(15) ‹lemma: Colligat disciplinam.› · no call; lemma note, col 628

Colligat disciplinam. Ita emendavi ex antiquissimo et optimo Regio-Put. In 2 al. Reg. Tornes., 5 Colb. et editis corrigat. 1 Reg. et Brun. corrigant.

Colligat disciplinam ("may draw discipline together"). So I have corrected it from the very old and excellent Regio-Puteanus. In two other Regius, the Tournes, five Colbert and the editions: corrigat ("may correct"). One Regius and the Brunswick: corrigant.

(printed under page 327)

(16) ‹lemma: Monstrare.› · no call; lemma note, col 628

Monstrare. 1 Bonon. antiq. monstrari; 1 Reg. rec. demonstrare.

Monstrare ("to show"). One old Bologna manuscript: monstrari ("to be shown"); one more recent Regius: demonstrare.

(printed under page 327)

(17) ‹lemma: A deorum cultibus.› · no call; lemma note, col 628 (continues)

A deorum cultibus. Ita optimi et antiquissimi mss. Bonon. et Reg. aliique plures cum scripti, tum editi; idque propius est rei exprimendae, quam cultoribus, quod est in 17 recentioribus mss. et 8 vulgatis. Legitur cultus plurali numero passim apud Lactantium. Praeterea apud Claudianum, quamvis alia notione, epigram. 25. (continues)

A deorum cultibus ("from the worships of the gods"). So the best and oldest manuscripts, the Bologna and the Regius, and many others both written and printed; and this is closer to expressing the matter than cultoribus ("worshippers"), which is in seventeen more recent manuscripts and eight printed editions. Cultus is read in the plural here and there in Lactantius. Also in Claudian, though in another sense, epigram 25. (continues)

(printed under page 327)

Page

  • running head: 627 FIRM. LACTANTII DIVIN. INSTIT.LIB (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹sumat eum Senecae librum›; B ‹mus esse nos Deo curae›; C ‹beside the notes: defendit: — Et hic›; D ‹beside the notes: Lapsis, in principio›
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-sentence at "legis vincula" (continues in col. 628); "idcirco enim voluit" set as printed, though "eum" may be intended (UNSURE, not marked as misprint); the heading VARIORUM NOTAE printed across the page width above the notes is not set; the Variorum notae at the page foot are not set (later pass); column number in head printed with damaged first figure
PL 6:628
ruperunt. Providit ergo, quatenus cultoribus suis praestaret quietem, si mandata servassent, et tamen eos emendaret, si praeceptis non obtemperassent. Itaque ne tam corrumperentur otio, quam patres eorum licentia, premi eos voluit ab iis, in quorum manibus eos collocavit, ut et labantes confirmet, et corruptos ad fortitudinem reparet, et fidos experiatur ac tentet. Quomodo enim potest imperator militum suorum probare virtutem, nisi habuerit hostem? Et illi tamen adversarius exurgit invito, et quia mortalis est, et vinci potest. Deo autem quia repugnari non potest, ipse adversarios nomini suo excitat, non qui contra ipsum Deum pugnent, sed contra milites ejus, ut devotionem ac fidem suorum vel probet, vel corroboret, donec pressurae verberibus diffluentem colligat disciplinam.
they broke. He therefore provided that He would grant quiet to His worshippers if they kept His commandments, and yet would correct them if they did not obey His precepts. And so, lest they should be corrupted by ease as much as their fathers had been by licence, He willed that they be oppressed by those into whose hands He had placed them, so that He might both strengthen the wavering, and restore the corrupt to fortitude, and try and test the faithful. For how can a commander prove the valour of his soldiers unless he has an enemy? And yet an adversary rises up against him against his will, both because he is mortal and because he can be conquered. But since God cannot be resisted, He Himself rouses up adversaries against His name, not such as would fight against God Himself, but against His soldiers, so that He may either prove or strengthen the devotion and faith of His own, until by the blows of affliction He gathers together a discipline that is dissolving.
Est et alia causa cur adversum nos persecutiones fieri sinat, ut Dei populus augeatur. Nec est difficile monstrare cur aut quomodo id fiat. Primum, fugantur a deorum cultibus plurimi, odio crudelitatis. Qui enim talia sacrificia non horreant? Deinde placet quibusdam virtus ac fides ipsa. Nonnulli suspicantur, deorum cultum non sine causa malum putari a tam multis hominibus, ut emori malint quam id facere,
There is also another reason why He allows persecutions to be carried out against us, namely that the people of God may be increased. Nor is it difficult to show why or how this comes about. First, very many are driven away from the worship of the gods through hatred of their cruelty. For who would not shudder at such sacrifices? Next, virtue and faith itself pleases some. Some suspect that the worship of the gods is not without cause thought evil by so many men, that they would rather die than do that,
Editors' notes and page, col. 628

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left] VIN. INSTIT. LIBER V. DE JUSTITIA. 628
  • marginal letters: A ruperunt. Providit ergo; B ribus diffluentem colligat; C Aberrarunt a disciplina (in the Variorum notae, not set); D rum et miseriarum praebebat (in the Variorum notae, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-sentence after "facere,"; heading "[V]ARIORUM NOTAE" printed across the page above the notes, cut off at the left edge, not set; the Variorum notae at the page foot (Aberrarunt a disciplina ... apud Claudianum, epigram. 25) left for the later pass; running head cut off at the left edge
PL 6:629
quod alii faciunt, ut vivant. Aliquis cupit scire quodnam sit illud bonum, quod ad mortem usque defenditur; quod omnibus, quae in hac vita jucunda sunt et chara, praefertur; a quo, nec bonorum, nec lucis amissio, nec dolor corporis, nec viscerum cruciamenta deterrent. Valent haec plurimum. Sed illae maxime causae nostrorum numerum semper auxerunt. Audit circumstans populus inter ipsa tormenta dicentes, non sacrificare se lapidibus humana manu factis, sed Deo vivo, qui sit in coelo. Multi hoc verum esse intelligunt, et in pectus admittunt. Deinde, ut fieri solet in rebus incertis, dum inter se invicem quaerunt, quae sit hujus perseverantiae causa, multa quae ad religionem pertinent, divulgata ac per rumorem vicissim aucupata discuntur, quae quia bona sunt, placeant necesse est. Praeterea, ultio consecuta, sicut semper accidit, ad credendum vehementer impellit. Ne haec quidem levis causa est, quod immundi daemonum spiritus, accepta licentia, multorum se corporibus immergunt; quibus postea ejectis, omnes qui resanati fuerint, adhaereant religioni, cujus potentiam senserunt. Hae tot causae in unum collatae magnam Deo multitudinem mirabiliter acquirunt.
which others do in order to live. Someone desires to know what that good is which is defended even unto death; which is preferred to all things that are pleasant and dear in this life; from which neither the loss of goods nor of the light, nor pain of body, nor torments of the vitals deter them. These things have very great force. But those causes above all have always increased our number. The people standing around hear them saying, amid the very tortures, that they do not sacrifice to stones made by human hand, but to the living God, Who is in heaven. Many understand this to be true, and admit it into their breast. Then, as is wont to happen in uncertain matters, while they ask one another what the cause of this perseverance is, many things that pertain to religion, spread abroad and picked up in turn through rumour, are learned, and because they are good, they cannot but please. Moreover, the vengeance that followed, as has always happened, drives them powerfully to believe. Nor is this indeed a light cause, that the unclean spirits of demons, having received leave, plunge themselves into the bodies of many; and when these have afterwards been cast out, all who have been healed adhere to the religion whose power they have felt. These so many causes, brought together into one, wonderfully acquire a great multitude for God.
CAPUT XXIV.
Chapter XXIV.
De ultione divina in Christianorum tortores.
On the divine vengeance upon the torturers of the Christians.
Quidquid ergo adversum nos mali principes moliuntur, fie⟨r⟩i ipse permittit. Et tamen injustissimi persecutores, quibus Dei nomen contumeliae ac ludibrio fuit, non se putent impune laturos, quia indignationis adversus nos ejus quasi ministri fuerunt. Punientur enim judicio Dei, qui, accepta potestate, supra humanum modum fuerint abusi, et insultaverint etiam Deo superbius, ejusque nomen aeternum vestigiis suis subjecerint impie nefarieque calcandum. Propterea vindicaturum se in eos celeriter pollicetur, et exterminaturum bestias malas de terra. Sed idem, quamvis populi sui vexationes et hic in praesenti soleat vindicare; tamen jubet nos expectare patienter illum coelestis judicii diem, quo ipse pro suis quemque meritis aut honoret, aut puniat. Quapropter non sperent sacrilegae animae contemptos et inultos fore, quos sic obterunt. Veniet, veniet rabiosis et voracibus lupis merces sua, qui justas et simplices animas, nullis facinoribus admissis, excruciaverunt. Nos tantummodo laboremus, ut ab hominibus nihil aliud in nobis, nisi sola justitia puniatur. Demus operam totis viribus, ut mereamur a Deo simul, et ultionem passionis, et praemium.
Whatever, therefore, wicked princes contrive against us, He Himself permits to be done. And yet let the most unjust persecutors, to whom the name of God has been an object of insult and mockery, not think that they will go unpunished, because they have been, as it were, the ministers of His indignation against us. For they will be punished by the judgement of God, who, having received power, have abused it beyond human measure, and have even insulted God too proudly, and have impiously and wickedly placed His eternal name beneath their feet to be trampled upon. Therefore He promises that He will swiftly avenge Himself upon them, and will exterminate the evil beasts from the earth. But the same God, although He is accustomed to avenge the vexations of His people even here in the present, nevertheless bids us wait patiently for that day of the heavenly judgement, on which He Himself will either honour or punish each according to his merits. Wherefore let sacrilegious souls not hope that those whom they thus trample down will be despised and unavenged. Their reward will come, it will come to the rabid and ravenous wolves who have tortured just and simple souls that had committed no crimes. Let us only labour that nothing else in us be punished by men except justice alone. Let us strive with all our strength that we may merit from God at once both the avenging of our suffering and the reward.
Editors' notes and page, col. 629

Footnotes

Heading: VARIORUM NOTAE. (Notes keyed by lemma, without call marks; numbered here in print order.) (printed under page 328)

(1) (continued) ‹lemma: A deorum cultibus. (from p. 327)› · no call; lemma note, col 629

(continued) Accipe regales cultus. Partim ex Cellario.

(printed under page 328)

(2) ‹lemma: Aliquis cupit scire.› · no call; lemma note, col 629

Aliquis cupit scire. Sic restitui ex omnibus mss. praeter 1 Reg. rec. in quo legitur, ut in editis, Aliqui cupiunt scire; 1, al. rec. Regius, Alii.

Aliquis cupit scire ("someone desires to know"). So I have restored it from all the manuscripts except one more recent Regius, in which it reads, as in the editions, Aliqui cupiunt scire ("some desire to know"); one other more recent Regius: Alii ("others").

(printed under page 328)

(3) ‹lemma: Quodnam sit.› · no call; lemma note, col 629

Quodnam sit. Ita reposui ex cunctis mss. praeter 1 Clarom., cui est quod non sit; 1 Reg. et 3 Colb. in quibus, sicut et ineditis, est quidnam sit.

Quodnam sit ("what it is"). So I have restored it from all the manuscripts except one Clermont, which has quod non sit ("which is not"), and one Regius and three Colbert, in which, as also in the unedited copies [printed "ineditis", perhaps for "in editis", "in the editions"], it is quidnam sit.

(printed under page 328)

(4) ‹lemma: Non sacrificare se lapidibus.› · no call; lemma note, col 629

Non sacrificare se lapidibus. Pro non, ms. Jun. et 7 edit. habent, nolle. — Lapidibus humana manu factis. Vindicamus iterum ad lib. de Ira, c. 2: Abjicere... cultus humana manu fabricatorum. Ipse Cicero l. V, in Verrem cap. ultimo dixit, Effigiem non humana manu factam. Bun.

Non sacrificare se lapidibus ("that he does not sacrifice to stones"). For non, the Junius manuscript and seven editions have nolle ("that he refuses"). — "To stones made by human hand." We defend it again from the book On the Anger of God, chapter 2: "To cast off... the worship of things fashioned by human hand." Cicero himself, in the fifth book against Verres, last chapter, said: "an image not made by human hand." Bünemann.

(printed under page 328)

(5) ‹lemma: Ultio consecuta.› · no call; lemma note, col 629

Ultio consecuta. Mss. 10 rec. et edit. 2, secuta. Hoc probat Lactantius in Libro de Mortibus persecutorum. — Ultio consecuta. Quod auctor de Mortibus persecutorum probat. Lips. autem consecuta: Angl. secuta. Cellarius.

Ultio consecuta ("vengeance followed upon"). Ten more recent manuscripts and two editions: secuta. Lactantius proves this in the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors. — Ultio consecuta. Which the author of On the Deaths of the Persecutors proves. The Leipzig copy, however, has consecuta; the English, secuta. Cellarius.

(printed under page 328)

(6) ‹lemma: Ne haec quidem levis causa est.› · no call; lemma note, col 629

Ne haec quidem levis causa est. Sic restitui ex 8 Reg., 2 Bon. aliisque octo, et editis 7, quod suavius fluit, quam nec haec 4 manuscriptorum totidemque editorum. In 2 Reg. rec. et edit. Rom. 1470, nec quidem.

Ne haec quidem levis causa est ("not even this is a slight cause"). So I have restored it from eight Regius, two Bologna and eight other manuscripts, and seven editions, since it flows more smoothly than the nec haec of four manuscripts and as many editions. In two more recent Regius and the Roman edition of 1470: nec quidem.

(printed under page 328)

(7) ‹lemma: Immundi.... immergunt.› · no call; lemma note, col 629

Immundi.... immergunt. Cyprian., l. II, ep. 2: Immundos spiritus, qui se hominibus immerserint, ad confessionem minis increpantibus cogere, ut excedant. Bun.

Immundi.... immergunt ("unclean.... plunge into"). Cyprian, Book II, Letter 2: "to force the unclean spirits that have plunged themselves into men to confession with rebuking threats, so that they depart." Bünemann.

(printed under page 328)

(8) ‹lemma: Adhaereant religioni.› · no call; lemma note, cols 629-630

Adhaereant religioni. Mss. 11, adhaerent. — Adhaereant religioni. Quasi causa reddatur cur permittat Deus tam multos a daemonibus agitari; nempe ut resanati adhaereant, ac reliqua. Bun.

Adhaereant religioni ("that they may cleave to religion"). Eleven manuscripts: adhaerent ("they cleave"). — Adhaereant religioni. As though the reason were being given why God permits so many to be harried by demons: namely, that once healed they may cleave to it, and so on. Bünemann.

(printed under page 328)

(9) ‹lemma: Bestias malas.› · no call; lemma note, col 630

Bestias malas. Sic Christianorum vexatores vocat Lactantius supra cap. 11, et pluribus in locis lib. de Mortibus persecutorum, scilicet cap. 4, 9, 16, 25, 32 et 39, ubi plura. Vide Apocalyps. cap. 19. Dominum autem sibi reservasse ultionem ex hoc capite notum, et ex Deuter. XXXII, v. 35; et Psalm. LXXVIII, 10; Rom. XII, 19; Hebr. X, 30.

Bestias malas ("evil beasts"). So Lactantius calls the persecutors of Christians above in chapter 11, and in several places in the book On the Deaths of the Persecutors, namely chapters 4, 9, 16, 25, 32 and 39, where there is more. See Revelation chapter 19. That the Lord has reserved vengeance to himself is known from this chapter, and from Deuteronomy 32:35; Psalm 78:10; Romans 12:19; Hebrews 10:30.

(printed under page 328)

(10) ‹lemma: Vexationes.› · no call; lemma note, col 630

Vexationes. Eleganter vocat ita persecutiones. Nostrum, ut in aliis, sic in hac voce sequitur Sulpic. Severus l. I Hist. c. 1: Vexationes populi christiani. Lib. II, c. 32: Christianorum vexatio. Buneman.

Vexationes ("harassments"). He elegantly calls the persecutions so. Sulpicius Severus follows our author in this word as in others, Book I of the History, chapter 1: "the harassments of the Christian people." Book II, chapter 32: "the harassment of the Christians." Bünemann.

(printed under page 328)

(11) ‹lemma: Jubet.› · no call; lemma note, col 630

Jubet. Vide Deut. XXXII, Eccl. XXVIII, Rom., XII, Hebr. X.

Jubet ("he commands"). See Deuteronomy 32, Ecclesiasticus 28, Romans 12, Hebrews 10.

(printed under page 328)

(12) ‹lemma: Quos sic obterunt.› · no call; lemma note, col 630

Quos sic obterunt. Ms. 1 Bonon. antiq. hic.

Quos sic obterunt ("whom they thus trample"). One old Bologna manuscript: hic ("here") [for sic].

(printed under page 328)

(13) ‹lemma: Veniet, veniet rabiosis.› · no call; lemma note, col 630

Veniet, veniet rabiosis. Ita plures mss. inter quos 1 Reg. antiquissimus, 1 al. Reg. bonae notae, Goth., Marm. et edit. octo. In multis deest repetitio, quam amat Lactantius, ut lib. VI, cap. 2, Hic, hic, Marce Tulli, aberrasti; et lib. VII, cap. 25, ad finem, Illa, illa est civitas. In sex tamen saeculi XV editionibus semel tantum est, veniet. — Veniet, veniet. Saepe ita Hieronymus ad Heliodorum f. 1, 2: Veniet, veniet postea dies; fol. 4: Veniet, veniet illa dies. Epist. de Vitando suspecto Contubernio, fol. 227: Veniet, veniet tempus. Buneman.

Veniet, veniet rabiosis ("it will come, it will come to the raging"). So several manuscripts, among them one very old Regius, another Regius of good repute, the Gotha and the Marmoutier, and eight editions. In many the repetition is missing, which Lactantius loves, as in Book VI, chapter 2, "Here, here, Marcus Tullius, you went astray"; and Book VII, chapter 25, at the end, "That, that is the city." In six fifteenth-century editions, however, veniet stands only once. — Veniet, veniet. Jerome often writes so, To Heliodorus, fol. 1, 2: "It will come, it will come, the day hereafter"; fol. 4: "It will come, it will come, that day." The letter On Avoiding Suspect Cohabitation, fol. 227: "It will come, it will come, the time." Bünemann.

(printed under page 328)

(14) ‹lemma: Ut ab hominibus nihil aliud in nobis.› · no call; lemma note, col 630

Ut ab hominibus nihil aliud in nobis. Reposui aliud ex omnibus mss. et quampluribus impressis, quod in nonnullis editis deerat. Ita et, nihil... aliud ab homine, initio libri sexti. Hic justitia sumitur pro cultu Dei, more scilicet Lactantiano.

Ut ab hominibus nihil aliud in nobis ("that by men nothing else in us"). I have restored aliud ("else") from all the manuscripts and very many printed editions; it was missing in some editions. So also "nothing... else from man," at the beginning of the sixth book. Here justice is taken for the worship of God, in Lactantius's manner, that is.

(printed under page 328)

Page

  • running head: 629 ANALYSIS LIBRI SE (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A quod alii faciunt, ut vivant; B placeant necesse est; C Quodnam sit (in the Variorum notae, not set); D Immundi.... immergunt (in the Variorum notae, not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: a full-width band stands across cols 629/630 in mid-page: the 3 paragraph(s) above it in col 630 are set here, after the 1 above it in col 629 (reading order, moved on receipt); the band itself (its title lines) is not set by the volunteer page: set it here, at the move, with full_width
  • other: the column continues with De agnitione Dei dictum est hactenus (another unit); not set here
PL 6:630
Editors' notes and page, col. 630

Page

  • running head: [ANA]LYSIS LIBRI SEXTI. 630 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ‹CAPUT XXIV.›; B ‹diem, quo ipse pro suis›; C ‹notum, et ex Deuter. XXXII› (in the Variorum notae); D ‹tempus.› (in the Variorum notae)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "adversum" printed with an accent mark over the u (adversúm/adversùm), set without it; "fieri" has a damaged r; "Quidquid" and "modum" show damaged or broken type but are legible. The full-width line "[VARIORUM] NOTAE", cut off at the left edge, stands below the chapter and is not set. The Variorum notes (Bestias malas, Vexationes, Jubet, Quos sic obterunt, Veniet veniet rabiosis, Ut ab hominibus...) are left for the later pass. The full-width title "[ANALY]SIS LIBRI SEXTI, [DE] VERO CULTU", cut off at the left edge, stands above the last paragraph and is not set. Below it stands editors' matter, the Analysis of Book VI ‹Cultus Dei vel falsus est›, which ends mid-sentence at the column foot; it belongs to the next unit and is not set here.
  • other: the 3 paragraph(s) of this column above the full-width band are set under col 629 (reading order, moved on receipt)
  • other: the text of this column below the full-width band belongs to the next unit; not set here (rail-only part)