Migne Reading Room

PL 65 · cols. 493–498

Fulgentius of Ruspe, Letters

Letter XVIII

PL 65:493
ipse praedestinatione sua et donum illuminationis ad credendum, et donum perseverantiae ad proficiendum atque permanendum, et donum glorificationis ad regnandum quibus dare voluit, praeparaverit, quique non aliter perficit in opere quam in sua sempiterna atque incommutabili habet dispositum voluntate. Cujus praedestinationis veritatem, qua nos ante mundi constitutionem praedestinatos in Christo testatur Apostolus (Ephes. I, 4), si quis detrectat cordis credulitate recipere, vel oris confessione proferre, si ante ultimum diem vitae praesentis impietatis suae contumaciam, qua Deo vivo et vero rebellis obsistit, non abjecerit, manifestum est eum non pertinere ad eorum numerum quos Deus in Christo ante mundi constitutionem gratis elegit et praedestinavit ad regnum. Pro quibus tamen nec oratio fidelium debet desistere, nec caritas aliquando torpere, ut Deus eis gratiam suae illuminationis donet, per quam in ipsis semen divini sermonis fructificet, qui frustra exterioribus auribus sonat, nisi Deus spiritali munere auditum hominis interioris aperiat.
He Himself by His predestination prepared, for those to whom He willed to give them, both the gift of illumination for believing, and the gift of perseverance for advancing and remaining, and the gift of glorification for reigning; and He accomplishes in deed nothing other than what He holds disposed in His everlasting and unchangeable will. If anyone refuses to receive with the belief of the heart, or to bring forth with the confession of the mouth, the truth of this predestination, by which the Apostle testifies that we were predestined in Christ before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1:4), then, if before the last day of the present life he has not cast off the obstinacy of his impiety, by which he stands in rebellion against the living and true God, it is manifest that he does not belong to the number of those whom God in Christ, before the foundation of the world, freely chose and predestined to the kingdom. Yet for such people neither ought the prayer of the faithful to cease, nor charity ever to grow sluggish, that God may give them the grace of His illumination, through which the seed of the divine word may bear fruit in them, the word which sounds in vain in the outward ears unless God by a spiritual gift opens the hearing of the inner man.
EPISTOLA XVIII.
LETTER XVIII.
Fulgentius Regino comiti, respondens ad priorem propositam ab ipso quaestionem: Utrum caro Christi corruptibilis an incorruptibilis fuerit. Posteriori, quia morte praeventus satisfacere: non potuit, satisfecit Ferrandus epist. ad eumdem de septem Regulis innocentiae.
Fulgentius to Count Reginus, answering the first question he had put to him: Whether the flesh of Christ was corruptible or incorruptible. To the second, which he could not answer because death overtook him, Ferrandus answered in his letter to the same man on the seven Rules of innocence.
CAPUT I. — Accipiens litteras tuas, fili carissime Regine, et sollicitudinem cordis tui agnoscens, Dominum collaudavi, qui potest utrumque, et bonum conferre servandum, et servare collatum. Utrumque enim pertinet ad medelam animarum nostrarum, quo gaudeamus in beneficiis quae nobis infirmis medici nostri non desinit ineffabilis operari benignitas, ut spiritali profectu et augeatur in nobis sanitas, et minuatur infirmitas. Modus vero infirmitatis nostrae duplici qualitate consistit: si vel per ignorantiam minus aliquid in fide noverimus, vel aliquid habeamus in operibus nostris, quod non conveniat regulae veritatis. Quoniam igitur corpus quod corrumpitur, aggravat animam (Sap. IX, 15), ideo nos utraque conturbat infirmitas. Sed ille qui nos fecit, et gaudere praecepit quia vicit mundum (Joan. XVI, 33), speramus quia nos in fide, quae per caritatem operatur, perficiet.
CHAPTER I. — On receiving your letter, dearest son Reginus, and recognizing the anxiety of your heart, I praised the Lord, Who is able to do both: to confer a good to be kept, and to keep what He has conferred. For both pertain to the healing of our souls, so that we may rejoice in the benefits which the ineffable kindness of our Physician does not cease to work for us who are sick, that by spiritual progress health may both be increased in us and sickness diminished. Now the measure of our sickness consists in a twofold quality: if either through ignorance we know something less in the faith, or we have something in our works which does not accord with the rule of truth. Since, therefore, the body which is corrupted weighs down the soul (Wis. 9:15), both kinds of sickness trouble us. But He Who made us, and commanded us to rejoice because He has overcome the world (John 16:33), will, we hope, perfect us in the faith which works through charity.
2. Dicis ergo quod nuper in Orientis partibus nova est orta inquisitio, aliis asserentibus incorruptibile fuisse corpus Christi ab ipso conceptionis exordio, aliis autem contrarium fatentibus, corruptibile ante passionem, incorruptibile vero post resurrectionem. Tu tamen in utraque parte valde haesitans, nec respondere sciens, instas ut quid tenere debeamus commoneam. Haec sunt quae interrogas. Superius autem tuae gratulationis indicio insinuas te meis litteris recreatum. Quoniam igitur interrogatio tua recti cordis tramitem tenuit, quo primitus quod ad fidem, deinde quod ad opera pertinet, apprehendit, quia
2. You say, then, that recently in the regions of the East a new inquiry has arisen, some asserting that the body of Christ was incorruptible from the very beginning of His conception, others professing the contrary, that it was corruptible before the passion but incorruptible after the resurrection. You, however, greatly hesitating between the two sides, and not knowing how to answer, urge me to advise what we ought to hold. These are the things you ask. Earlier, moreover, by the token of your thanks, you intimate that you were refreshed by my letter. Since, then, your question has kept to the path of an upright heart, by which it has taken up first what pertains to faith, then what pertains to works, because
Editors' notes and page, col. 493

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: satisfecit Ferrandus› · call in col 493 (in the italic subtitle under EPISTOLA XVIII.)

V. inter opera Fulgent. Ferrandi a Chifletio edita ann. 1649.

See [it] among the works of Fulgentius Ferrandus edited by Chifflet in the year 1649.

(printed under page 252)

Page

  • running head: 493 EPISTOLA XV… (rest of the running head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A ipse praedestinatione sua; B lium debet desistere; C conferre servandum; D 2. Dicis ergo quod
  • old-edition numerals: 324 after medici
  • other: the italic subtitle under "EPISTOLA XVIII." (Fulgentius Regino comiti ...) is set as its own layer-1 paragraph (unit rule), without italic markup; the call (a) after Ferrandus is not set. A colon is printed after satisfacere (kept as printed); "epist" is followed by a soft mark read as a full stop.
PL 65:494
fidem, quae per caritatem operatur, commendat apostolus, illo scilicet †necessitatis obtentu, quod fides sine operibus mortua est in semetipsa (Jac. †II, 26).
the apostle commends the faith which works through charity, namely on the ground of that necessity, that faith without works is dead in itself (Jas. 2:17, 26).
CAP. II. — 3. Volo itaque, carissime, ut scias non uno modo dicere corruptionem, sed duobus modis, sicut dicimus infirmitatem, et similiter mortem. Dominus enim mortem †inquit esse perpetrationem criminis, et mortem in qua retributio nihilominus intelligitur ultionis. Dicitur etiam infirmitas hominis, ejus scilicet qui exhibet peccato servitium, et ejus qui portat peccati supplicium. Utrumque ad infirmitatem pertinet peccatoris, et delectatio in peccatis, et afflictio pro peccatis. Sic etiam corruptionem dupliciter dicimus, cujus una pars in sola hominis culpa, altera invenitur in poena. Ad culpam quidem pertinet illa corruptionis pars quam Apostolus ostendit, ubi dicit: Homines corrupti mente, reprobi circa fidem (II Tim. III, 8). Ad hanc partem corruptionis pertinet quod alio loco dicit, Corrumpunt mores bonos colloquia prava (I Cor. XV, 33). Ista corruptionis pars primo animam capit, et per animam carnem in peccatum trahit. Haec pars corruptionis mentem superbientis angeli primo invasit, ac deinde primum hominem, postmodum totum genus humanum.
CHAPTER II. — 3. I wish, then, dearest one, that you should know that corruption is spoken of not in one way but in two, just as we speak of sickness, and likewise of death. For the Lord, He says, calls death both the committing of crime and the death in which the requital of vengeance is no less understood. Sickness, too, is said of a man: both of him who renders service to sin and of him who bears the punishment of sin. Both belong to the sickness of the sinner: delight in sins and affliction for sins. So too we speak of corruption in a twofold way: one part of it is found in man's guilt alone, the other in punishment. To guilt belongs that part of corruption which the Apostle shows where he says: Men corrupted in mind, reprobate concerning the faith (2 Tim. 3:8). To this part of corruption belongs what he says in another place: Evil conversations corrupt good morals (1 Cor. 15:33). This part of corruption first seizes the soul, and through the soul drags the flesh into sin. This part of corruption first invaded the mind of the angel who grew proud, and then the first man, and afterwards the whole human race.
4. Primam ergo corruptionis partem, quae consistit in concupiscentia vel perpetratione peccati, secuta est illa pars quae constat in retributione supplicii, quae duobus tenet animam et corpus hominis peccatoris. In ipsa quoque retributione quaedam sunt in quibus poena peccati simul sit et ipsum peccatum; alia vero sunt, in quibus solum sit peccati supplicium. In illis ergo in quibus reperitur poena simul et culpa, opere quo reatus in peccatore punitur, Deo derelinquente, augetur homine delinquente. Haec est illa pars corruptionis per quam sic peccata puniuntur in homine ut non desinant, sed ut crescant: sicut est libido cordis et corporis, quae cum ex poena peccati eveniat, peccatum multiplicat, et animam punitioni subditam noxia delectatione captivat. Tertiam quoque punitionem huic secundae retributam Aopstolus dicit: Propter quod tradidit illos Deus in reprobum sensum, ut faciant quae non conveniunt (Rom. I, 28). Non ergo ut patiantur tantum, sed ut faciant unde peccata multiplicentur, divina in reprobum sensum damnatione traduntur. Verumtamen haec traditio, non in operatione Dei, sed in desertione consistit. Quosdam enim tradit Deus, nec dimittit: quosdam vero in eo quod tradit dimittit. Bonos sic tradit paterna benignitate, ut non deserat paterno juvamine. Ac per hoc tradit eos ad patienda mala quibus ipsi perficiantur, non ad facienda quibus deteriores existant. Malos autem ad hoc tradit Dominus, et dimittit, ut, ipso deserente, dum non Dei voluntatem, sed suam sequuntur, sua turpitudine delectentur, nec poenam suam portent inviti, sed sequantur illecti.
4. The first part of corruption, then, which consists in the desire or the committing of sin, was followed by that part which stands in the requital of punishment, which holds in two ways the soul and the body of the sinful man. In this requital itself, too, there are some things in which the punishment of sin is at the same time sin itself; and there are others in which there is only the punishment of sin. In those, then, in which punishment and guilt are found together, by the very working by which guilt is punished in the sinner, it is increased, God forsaking and man transgressing. This is that part of corruption through which sins are so punished in man that they do not cease but grow: such is the lust of heart and body, which, though it comes about from the punishment of sin, multiplies sin, and takes captive by harmful delight the soul made subject to punishment. A third punishment too, requited upon this second, the Apostle speaks of: For which cause God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do the things that are not fitting (Rom. 1:28). Not only, then, that they may suffer, but that they may do things whereby sins are multiplied, they are delivered by divine condemnation to a reprobate sense. Yet this delivering up consists not in God's working but in His forsaking. For some God delivers up and does not let go; but others, in delivering them up, He lets go. The good He so delivers up with fatherly kindness that He does not forsake them of His fatherly help. And therefore He delivers them up to suffer evils by which they themselves are perfected, not to do things by which they become worse. But the wicked the Lord delivers up and lets go to this end, that, He forsaking them, while they follow not God's will but their own, they may take delight in their own baseness, and may not bear their punishment unwillingly, but follow it enticed.
Editors' notes and page, col. 494

Page

  • running head: [EPI]STOLA XVIII. 494 (left part cut at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A fidem, quae per caritatem; B pertinet illa corruptionis; C quibus poena peccati; D reprobum sensum damnatione
  • old-edition numerals: 325 after libido
  • other: The top third (to "Ista corruptionis pars") is a very soft scan. † necessitatis: read from blurred letter-shapes. † II in (Jac. II, 26): the book numeral is blurred; 26 is clear. † inquit in "Dominus enim mortem inquit esse": the sense is odd and the letters soft; the reading follows the visible shapes. "opere quo reatus" and "quae duobus tenet" set as printed.
PL 65:495
CAP. III. — 5. Haec est iniquorum corruptio, quae sic est poena peccati, ut sit et ipsa peccatum. Alia corruptionis pars est quae nec animam nec corpus fidelis hominis polluit, sed affligit: quia nec ad inquinandum hominem, sed ad humiliandum militat peccatorem. Hac itaque discretione retenta, dum corruptionem voluntariam a corruptione poenali discernimus, ipsiusque poenalis corruptionis unam partem cum peccato, alteram sine peccato inesse hominibus invenitur, talis autem corruptio cordis nihil aliud est, nisi privatio sanitatis, quia nulla ex hac corruptione contrahitur iniquitas, licet insit infirmitas: facillime invenimus quam partem corruptionis suscepit Christus in corpore. Nam quamvis carnem pro nobis susceperit, tamen accepit immunem ab omni peccato originali et actuali. Ipsam tamen carnem, non solum infirmam, sed etiam veraciter cognoscitur accepisse mortalem. Procul dubio in quantum corpori ejus inerat suscepta mortalitas, in tantum ei potuit inesse corruptionis infirmitas. Illius scilicet corruptionis quae abest ab omni peccato.
CHAPTER III. — 5. This is the corruption of the wicked, which is so the punishment of sin that it is itself also sin. There is another part of corruption which neither defiles the soul nor the body of the faithful man, but afflicts it: because it serves not to defile the man, but to humble the sinner. Keeping hold, then, of this distinction, while we distinguish voluntary corruption from penal corruption, and find that of penal corruption itself one part is present in men with sin and the other without sin, and that such corruption of the heart is nothing other than the privation of health, since no iniquity is contracted from this corruption, though weakness is present in it: we very easily find which part of corruption Christ took up in His body. For although He took flesh for us, yet He received it immune from all sin, original and actual. Yet that same flesh He is known to have truly received not only weak but also mortal. Beyond doubt, in so far as the mortality He had taken up was in His body, so far could the weakness of corruption be in it; that is, of that corruption which is free from all sin.
6. Ad talem corruptionem pertinet fames et sitis. Facile siquidem esuriendo et sitiendo corpus mortale corrumpitur, quando per haec etiam ad ipsius mortis exitum pervenitur. Per quam mortem venitur ad corruptionem, dum, deserente anima, in tantum corpus corrumpitur, ut in putredinem ac pulverem redigatur. Hanc corruptionem caro Christi non vidit, quae die tertia resurrexit. Famem tamen, sitim, fatigationem corporis ac dolorem veraciter sensit: quae omnia pertinent ad illam partem poenalis corruptionis quam sic ex peccati poena supplicio trahimus, ut ex ea nullum peccati supplicium contrahamus. Esurisse Christum, sitisse fatigationemque sensisse Evangelium docet (Marc. XI, 13), quem manifestum est esurisse, quando ad ficulneam venit, nec in ea fructum invenit. Fatigatus etiam ex itinere sedit super puteum (Joan. IV, 6). In cruce etiam dixit, Sitio (Joan. XIX, 28). Dolorem etiam sustinuit, sicut dicit Esaias: Vulneratus est propter iniquitates nostras: infirmatus est propter scelera nostra (Isa. LIII, 5). Hanc infirmitatem in Domino non putativam, sed veram docet Apostolus: Nam etsi crucifixus est, inquit, ex infirmitate, sed vivit ex virtute Dei (II Cor. XIII, 4). Infirmitatem non aliud dicit, quam corruptibilitatem.
6. To such corruption belong hunger and thirst. For the mortal body is easily corrupted by hungering and thirsting, since through these one comes even to the end of death itself. Through which death one comes to corruption, when, the soul departing, the body is corrupted so far as to be reduced to rottenness and dust. This corruption the flesh of Christ did not see, which rose again on the third day. Yet He truly felt hunger, thirst, weariness of body and pain: all of which belong to that part of penal corruption which we so draw as a penalty from the punishment of sin that from it we contract no punishment of sin. That Christ hungered, thirsted and felt weariness the Gospel teaches (Mark 11:13): it is manifest that He hungered when He came to the fig tree and found no fruit on it. Wearied too from the journey, He sat down by the well (John 4:6). On the cross also He said, I thirst (John 19:28). He also endured pain, as Isaiah says: He was wounded for our iniquities, He was made weak for our crimes (Isa. 53:5). That this weakness in the Lord was not apparent but real the Apostle teaches: For although He was crucified, he says, out of weakness, yet He lives by the power of God (2 Cor. 13:4). By weakness he means nothing other than corruptibility.
CAP. IV. — 7. Restat itaque ut et Christum fuisse in aliqua corruptione ad quam non rediit, et non fuisse in ea quam non vidit, per sacram Scripturam discamus. Ad corruptionem pertinet corporis animalis, et mors quae praecedit putredinem, et putredo quae sequitur mortem. Proinde Christi corpus, quod est vere mortuum, et die tertio sine aliqua putredine suscitatum, unam partem corruptionis vidisse, aliam non vidisse dicendum est. Fuit quippe in corruptione mortis, sed non in corruptione putredinis: quando caro Christi sic est mortua, ut nulla fuisset membrorum putredo, vel dissolutio subsecuta. Christus ergo non revertetur in corruptionem, quia surgens a mortuis, jam non moritur, et mors illi ultra non dominabitur
CHAPTER IV. — 7. It remains, then, that we learn through sacred Scripture both that Christ was in some corruption to which He did not return, and that He was not in that which He did not see. To the corruption of the animal body belong both death, which precedes rottenness, and rottenness, which follows death. Accordingly it must be said that the body of Christ, which truly died and was raised on the third day without any rottenness, saw one part of corruption and did not see the other. For He was in the corruption of death, but not in the corruption of rottenness, since the flesh of Christ so died that no rottenness or dissolution of the members followed. Christ therefore will not return to corruption, because, rising from the dead, He dies now no more, and death shall no longer have dominion over Him
Editors' notes and page, col. 495

Page

  • running head: 495 S. FULGENTII EPISCOP[I] (rest cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A Cap. III. — 5. Haec est; B non solum infirmam; C nis quam sic ex; D in aliqua corruptione
  • old-edition numerals: 326 after virtute
  • other: The column ends on "dominabi-"; completed as "dominabitur" from "tur" visible at the top of the facing column (A) in c495_1. "(Isà." printed with a stray accent mark: set "Isa." as a type blemish. The last two lines (from "caro Christi sic est mortua") are soft but legible.
PL 65:496
(Rom. VI, 9). Christus ergo non vidit corruptionem, quia nullam sensit caro ejus putredinem. Hoc autem non ejusdem carnis incorruptibilitas, sed resurrectionis celeritas fecit. His omnibus in quibus nostrae seminationis ac resurrectionis certissimam qualitatem verbis apostolicis sanctus Augustinus ostendit, dicens: Constat itaque, neque ullo modo dubitandum est, corpus Christi, quod licet corruptionem putredinis in sepulcro non senserit, quia scriptum est, « Non dabis sanctum tuum videre corruptionem (Psal. XV, 10), » clavis tamen et lancea corrumpi potuit, nunc omnino in incorruptione persistere; et quod in contumelia passionis mortisque seminatum est, nunc esse in gloria vitae aeternae; et quod ex infirmitate potuit crucifigi, nunc in virtute regnare; et quod erat corpus animale, quoniam ex Adam sumptum est, nunc spiritale esse, quoniam spiritui nunc inseparabiliter copulatum est (Epist. ad Consentium, alias 146, nunc 205).
(Rom. 6:9). Christ therefore did not see corruption, because His flesh felt no rottenness. This, however, was brought about not by any incorruptibility of that flesh but by the swiftness of the resurrection. In all these matters, in which with the apostle's words he shows the most certain character of our sowing and resurrection, Saint Augustine says: It is established, then, and in no way to be doubted, that the body of Christ, which, though it did not feel the corruption of rottenness in the tomb, because it is written, "Thou wilt not give Thy holy one to see corruption" (Ps. 15:10), yet could be corrupted by the nails and the lance, now abides wholly in incorruption; and that what was sown in the dishonour of passion and death is now in the glory of eternal life; and that what could be crucified out of weakness now reigns in power; and that what was an animal body, since it was taken from Adam, is now spiritual, since it is now inseparably joined to the spirit (Letter to Consentius, formerly 146, now 205).
8. His verbis Augustinus ostendit quale corpus Christi post resurrectionem sit, et quale ante passionem fuerit. Evidenter confirmat corpus Christi omnino nunc in incorruptione persistere, nunc etiam in gloria vitae aeternae, nunc in virtute regnare, nunc spiritale esse. Sed corpus non est omnino incorruptibile, quod dolorem potest per vulnera sentire. Quocirca apparet Christum ante passionem, imo usque ad passionem et mortem, mortale atque animale corpus habuisse, et pro nobis in eodem corpore veram famem, veram sitim fatigationemque sensisse, vera clavorum ac lanceae percepisse vulnera; et ex hoc verum dolorum non necessitate, sed voluntate sensisse, veraeque mortis acceptatione pro nobis animam suam propria potestate posuisse. Consequens est ut idem Christus ex infirmitate mortuus, ex virtute autem Dei suscitatus, nostris inveniatur exemplum praebuisse corporibus. Humiliavit enim se Christus usque ad susceptionem totius infirmitatis nostrae: ut, sicut ait Apostolus, reformetur corpus humilitatis nostrae configuratum corpori claritatis suae (Philip. III, 21).
8. With these words Augustine shows what the body of Christ is after the resurrection, and what it was before the passion. He plainly affirms that the body of Christ now abides wholly in incorruption, is now also in the glory of eternal life, now reigns in power, is now spiritual. But a body which can feel pain through wounds is not wholly incorruptible. Hence it is clear that Christ before the passion, indeed right up to the passion and death, had a mortal and animal body, and in that same body for our sake felt real hunger, real thirst and weariness, received real wounds of the nails and the lance; and from this felt real pain, not by necessity but by will, and by accepting a real death for us laid down His life by His own power. It follows that the same Christ, having died out of weakness but been raised by the power of God, is found to have given an example to our bodies. For Christ humbled Himself even to taking up the whole of our weakness, so that, as the Apostle says, the body of our lowliness may be reformed, made like to the body of His glory (Phil. 3:21).
9. Hinc ergo manifestissime apparet quid de animalis ac mortalis corporis qualitate debeat omnis Christianus firma credulitate sentire: impossibile ut corruptibilitas esse negetur, ubi animalis corporis mortalitas invenitur. Christus ergo in sola carne portavit nostram corruptionem, in qua veraciter nostram portavit et mortem. In anima vero sic perfectam incorruptibilitatem servavit, sicut peccatum nec propagine traxit, nec contagione contraxit. Unde et infirmitates animarum nostrarum quas in sua rationali anima portavit Christus sine ulla corruptione portavit. Nullus quippe potuit defectus inesse virtutis, ubi infirmitatis, susceptione indefessa permansit perfectio caritatis, quae Unigenitum Deum fecit usque ad mortem pro nobis accedere, et confusione contempta crucis opprobrium sustinere.
9. From this, then, it appears most manifestly what every Christian ought to hold with firm belief about the character of the animal and mortal body: it is impossible that corruptibility should be denied where the mortality of an animal body is found. Christ therefore bore our corruption in His flesh alone, in which He truly bore our death as well. But in His soul He kept so perfect an incorruptibility that He neither drew sin by descent nor contracted it by contagion. Hence also the weaknesses of our souls which Christ bore in His rational soul He bore without any corruption. For there could be no failure of virtue where, in the taking up of weakness, the perfection of charity remained unwearied, which made the Only-begotten God go even to death for us, and, despising the shame, endure the reproach of the cross.
10. Propter quod tristitiam, moerorem, vel si quas nostrarum animarum infirmitates habuit Christus, veras quidem, sed voluntarias habuit. Veras scilicet,
10. For this reason sadness, grief, or whatever weaknesses of our souls Christ had, He had them real indeed, but voluntary. Real, that is,
Editors' notes and page, col. 496

Page

  • running head: [S. FULGENT]I EPISCOPI RUSPENSIS 496 (left part cut at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A tur (Rom. VI, 9); B corpus animale, quoniam; C nera; et ex hoc; D portavit nostram corruptionem
  • old-edition numerals: 327 after propagine
  • other: The column opens with "tur", the end of "dominabitur" begun in col. 495, and set there whole; so this column's text begins at "(Rom. VI, 9)". It ends on "sci-", completed in col. 497 (almost certainly "scilicet"); per the column-break rule the word is set whole here as "scilicet," (QA Q3: the earlier wording "set as the visible part" did not match the file). The English "that is" assumes "scilicet". "verum dolorum" and "infirmitatis, susceptione" (comma) set as printed.
PL 65:497
ut manifestum in se animae rationalis monstraret affectum; voluntarias, ut nostris infirmitatibus adfuturum ostenderet suae virtutis auxilium, ut agnosceremus nos ipso adjuvante in infirmitatibus, quas necessitate patimur, fulciendos. Qui propterea voluntate nostras infirmitates acciperet, ut et in hac vita infirmitatum necessitate turbatis auxilium contulisset, et post hanc vitam omnem a nobis infirmitatis necessitatem misericorditer abstulisset. Ac sic
that He might show in Himself the evident affection of a rational soul; voluntary, that He might show the help of His power to be present to our weaknesses, so that we might recognize that, He aiding us, we are to be upheld in the weaknesses which we suffer by necessity. He took our weaknesses by His will for this reason: that He might both bring help in this life to those troubled by the necessity of weaknesses, and after this life mercifully take away from us all necessity of weakness. And so
Editors' notes and page, col. 497

Page

  • running head: 497 DE TRINITATE LIB[ER] (rest cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: A licet, ut manifestum
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: The column opens with "licet", completing "sci-" at the foot of col. 496 ("scilicet"). Letter XVIII does NOT end in this column: its upper part ends mid-sentence at "Ac sic", and the letter runs on in the upper part of col. 498 (the facing column's line-starts "omn…", "mana…", "aetern…", "tristit…" are visible at the right edge), above the rule. Col. 498's upper part is outside this assignment and still has to be set. Below the rule: "S. FULGENTII AD FELICEM NOTARIUM DE TRINITATE LIBER UNUS", another work, not set. The top third is a soft scan but legible.
PL 65:498
omnis fidelis agnoscens Christum participem humanae infirmitatis, certissime speraret participem se fore divinae virtutis, nec se ambigeret illius virtute firmandum, quem pro se cognovisset non necessitate, sed voluntate turbatum: in ipso habiturum aeternam laetitiam, cui †suam voluntate videret inesse tristitiam, qui sicut mansit in tribulatione tranquillus, in morte securus, sic in infirmitate fortissimus, et in humilitate altissimus.
every believer, recognizing Christ as sharer in human weakness, would most surely hope that he himself would be a sharer in divine power, and would not doubt that he was to be strengthened by the power of Him whom he had come to know as troubled for his sake not by necessity but by will; that he would have eternal joy in Him in whom he saw sorrow present by [His own] will; Who, as He remained tranquil in tribulation, secure in death, so [was] strongest in weakness and loftiest in humility.
Editors' notes and page, col. 498

Page

  • running head: [S. FULGENTII AD FELICEM NOTARIUM DE TRINI]TATE LIBER UNUS. 498 (left part cut off in the image; the column number is printed soft, '98 legible)
  • marginal letters: A ‹omnis fidelis agnoscens›; B, C, D stand beside the Liber ad Felicem below the rule (not set)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the column continues the sentence begun at "Ac sic" at the foot of col 497. Upper part of the scan is very soft: "speraret", "cognovisset" and "turbatum:" read from blurred type (the stop after turbatum may be a comma); †suam: the type seems to show "suam", but the sense needs "sua" (ablative with voluntate); set as seen, unconfirmed. Letter XVIII ends here, above the rule. Below the rule: S. Fulgentii Ad Felicem notarium de Trinitate liber unus (caption and text continued from col 497, through CAPUT II), another work, not set.
  • other (QA Q2): Footnotes: the two foot images of page 254 show no footnotes under either column (the text of the Ad Felicem runs to the foot), so none are called in the upper part of col 498. The column images c498_1–3 were not on disk at Q2, so the source of the upper part (and †suam) was not re-read against the page by Q2.