Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1474–1483

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus VII-XII

Tractate XI

PL 35:1474
Christus de Adam corpus accepit, non de Adam peccatum traxit; templum corporeum inde sumpsit, non iniquitatem quae de templo pellenda est: ipsam autem carnem quam traxit de Adam (Maria enim de Adam, et Domini caro de Maria), Judaei crucifixerunt; et ille resuscitaturus erat ipsam carnem in triduo, quam illi in cruce erant occisuri: illi solverunt templum quadraginta sex annis aedificatum, et ille in triduo resuscitavit illud.
Christ received a body from Adam, but did not draw sin from Adam; He took from there a bodily temple, not the iniquity which is to be driven out of the temple. That very flesh, however, which He drew from Adam (for Mary is from Adam, and the Lord's flesh from Mary), the Jews crucified; and He was going to raise up in three days that very flesh which they were going to kill on the cross: they destroyed a temple built in forty-six years, and He raised it up in three days.
13. Benedicimus Domino Deo nostro, qui ad laetitiam spiritualem congregavit nos. Simus in humilitate cordis semper, et gaudium nostrum penes ipsum sit. Non de prosperitate aliqua hujus saeculi inflemur, sed noverimus felicitatem nostram non esse nisi cum ista transierint. Modo gaudium nostrum, fratres mei, in spe sit: nemo gaudeat quasi in re praesenti, ne haereat in via. Totum gaudium de spe futura sit, totum desiderium vitae aeternae sit. Omnia suspiria Christo anhelent: ille unus pulcherrimus, qui et foedos dilexit ut pulchros faceret, desideretur; ad illum unum curratur, illi ingemiscatur; et dicant semper, Magnificetur Dominus, qui volunt pacem servi ejus.
13. We bless the Lord our God, Who has gathered us together for spiritual joy. Let us always be in humility of heart, and let our joy be with Him. Let us not be puffed up by any prosperity of this world, but let us know that our happiness does not exist except when these things have passed away. For now, my brothers, let our joy be in hope: let no one rejoice as if in a present thing, lest he stick fast on the way. Let all joy be from future hope, let all desire be for eternal life. Let all sighs pant for Christ: let Him alone, the most beautiful, Who loved even the ugly that He might make them beautiful, be desired; let there be running to Him alone, let there be groaning to Him; and let those who will the peace of His servant always say, Let the Lord be magnified (Ps. 34:27).
TRACTATUS XI.
Tractate 11.
Ab eo quod scriptum est, Cum autem esset Jerosolymis in Pascha in die festo, multi crediderunt in nomine ejus; usque ad id, Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et Spiritu, non potest introire in regnum Dei. Cap. II, ℣. 23-25, et cap. III, ℣. 1-5.
From what is written, Now when He was in Jerusalem at the Passover, on the feast day, many believed in His name; as far as this, Unless someone has been reborn of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Chapter 2, verses 23-25, and chapter 3, verses 1-5.
1. Opportune nobis Dominus procuravit hodierno die lectionis hujus ordinem: nam quia ex ordine Evangelium secundum Joannem considerare atque tractare suscepimus, credo quod adverterit Charitas vestra. Opportune ergo occurrit ut hodie audiretis ex Evangelio, quia Nisi quis renatus fuerit ex aqua et Spiritu, non videbit regnum Dei. Tempus est enim ut vos exhortemur, qui adhuc estis catechumeni: qui sic credidistis in Christum, ut adhuc vestra peccata portetis. Nullus autem regnum coelorum videbit oneratus peccatis; quia nisi cui dimissa fuerint, non regnabit cum Christo: dimitti autem non possunt, nisi ei qui renatus fuerit ex aqua et Spiritu sancto. Sed omnia verba quemadmodum se habeant advertamus, ut hic inveniant qui pigri sunt, quanta sollicitudine sibi festinandum sit ad onus deponendum. Quia si ferrent aliquam sarcinam gravem, aut lapidis, aut ligni, aut alicujus etiam lucri, si frumentum portarent, si vinum, si pecuniam, currerent ut deponerent onera; portant sarcinam peccatorum, et pigri sunt currere. Currendum est ut deponatur haec sarcina; premit, et mergit.
1. Opportunely the Lord has arranged for us the order of this reading on today's date: for since we have undertaken to consider and treat the Gospel according to John in order, I believe Your Charity has noticed. It has therefore opportunely come about that today you should hear from the Gospel that Unless someone has been reborn of water and the Spirit, he will not see the kingdom of God (John 3:5). For it is time for us to exhort you who are still catechumens: you who have so believed in Christ that you still carry your sins. But no one will see the kingdom of heaven weighed down with sins; for unless they have been forgiven someone, he will not reign with Christ: but they cannot be forgiven except to him who has been reborn of water and the Holy Spirit. But let us notice how all the words stand, so that those who are sluggish may find here with what eagerness they must hasten to lay down their burden. For if they were carrying some heavy load, either of stone, or of wood, or even of some gain, if they were carrying grain, if wine, if money, they would run to lay down their burdens; they carry a load of sins, and they are sluggish to run. One must run so that this load may be laid down; it presses down, and it sinks.
2. Ecce audistis quia cum esset Dominus Jesus Christus Jerosolymis in Pascha in die festo, multi crediderunt in nomine ejus, videntes signa ejus quae faciebat. Multi crediderunt in nomine ejus: et quid sequitur? Ipse autem Jesus non credebat semetipsum eis. Quid sibi ergo hoc vult, Illi credebant in nomine ejus; et, Ipse Jesus non credebat semetipsum eis? An forte non crediderant ei, et fingebant se credidisse, et propterea
2. See, you have heard that when the Lord Jesus Christ was in Jerusalem at the Passover, on the feast day, many believed in His name, seeing His signs which He was doing. Many believed in His name: and what follows? But Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them (John 2:23–24). What then does this mean, They believed in His name; and, Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them? Or perhaps they had not believed in Him, and were pretending to have believed, and therefore
Editors' notes and page, col. 1474

Page

  • running head: …ACTATUS XI. CAPUT II. 1474
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-paragraph (end of Tract. 10, §12) continued from the previous column; last word "pro-" split at the column break; running head cut off at the left edge of the image; "ligni" printed with damaged letters (reads like "ligrli"), set as ligni; stray mark before the semicolon after "onera" not set; in §2 "crcdebant", "nominc", "credcbat" appear to be worn e's in the scan rather than misprints, set as credebant, nomine, credebat (UNSURE); verse sign in the tractate's summary set as ℣.
  • other: the word propterea was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1475
PL 35:1475
Jesus non se credebat eis; Sed non diceret Evangelista, Multi crediderunt in nomine ejus, nisi verum illis testimonium perhiberet. Magna ergo res, et mira res: credunt homines in Christum, et Christus non se credit hominibus. Praesertim quia Filius Dei est, utique volens passus est; et si nollet, nunquam pateretur; qui si nollet, nec nasceretur: si autem hoc solum vellet, ut nasceretur tantum, et non moreretur, et quidquid vellet, faceret; quia omnipotentis Patris Filius omnipotens est. Ex ipsis rebus probemus. Quia cum voluissent eum tenere, discessit ab eis; loquitur Evangelium: Et cum voluissent eum de vertice montis praecipitare, discessit ab eis illaesus (Luc. IV, 29, 30). Et quando venerunt ad eum comprehendendum, jam venditum a Juda traditore, cum ille putaret in potestate se habere, tradere magistrum et Dominum suum; et ibi ostendit Dominus voluntate se pati, non necessitate. Nam cum eum comprehendere Judaei voluissent, dixit illis: Quem quaeritis? At illi dixerunt: Jesum Nazarenum. Et ille: Ego sum. Hac voce audita, redierunt retro, et ceciderunt (Joan. XVIII, 4-6). In eo quod eos respondens dejecit, ostendit potestatem; ut in eo quod ab eis comprehensus est, ostenderet voluntatem. Ergo quod passus est, misericordiae fuit. Traditus est enim propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram (Rom. IV, 25). Audi verba ipsius: Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam: nemo tollit eam a me, sed ego pono illam a meipso, ut iterum sumam eam (Joan. X, 18). Cum ergo haberet tantam potestatem, cum eam dictis praedicaret, factis ostenderet; quid sibi vult quod non se credebat eis Jesus, quasi aliquid nolenti nocituris, aut aliquid nolenti facturis, praesertim quia jam crediderant in nomine ejus? Et de ipsis dicit Evangelista, Crediderunt in nomine ejus, de quibus dicit, Ipse autem Jesus non credebat semetipsum eis. Quare? Quod ipse nosset omnes, et quia opus ei non erat ut quis testimonium perhiberet de homine; ipse enim sciebat quid esset in homine. Plus noverat artifex quid esset in opere suo, quam ipsum opus quid esset in semetipso. Creator hominis noverat quid esset in homine, quod ipse creatus homo non noverat. Nonne hoc probamus de Petro, quia non noverat quid in ipso esset, quando dixit, Tecum usque ad mortem? Audi quia Dominus noverat quid esset in homine: Tu mecum usque ad mortem? Amen, amen dico tibi, priusquam gallus cantet, ter me negabis (Matth. XXVI, 33, 34, et Luc. XXII, 33, 34). Homo ergo nesciebat quid esset in se; sed Creator hominis noverat quid esset in homine. Crediderunt tamen in nomine ejus multi, et ipse Jesus non se credebat eis. Quid dicimus, fratres? Forte consequentia indicabunt nobis quid sibi vult mysterium verborum istorum. Quia crediderant in eum homines, manifestum est, verum est: nemo dubitat, Evangelium loquitur, verax Evangelista testatur. Item quia ipse Jesus non credebat semetipsum illis, et hoc manifestum est, et nullus christianus dubitat: quia et hoc Evangelium loquitur, et idem verax Evangelista testatur. Quare ergo crediderunt illi in
Jesus did not entrust Himself to them; But the Evangelist would not say, Many believed in His name, unless he were bearing true testimony to them. A great thing, then, and a wondrous thing: men believe in Christ, and Christ does not entrust Himself to men. Especially since He is the Son of God, He certainly suffered willingly; and if He had not willed it, He would never have suffered; for if He had not willed it, He would not even have been born: but if He had willed only this, that He should merely be born and not die, [it would have been so]; and whatever He willed, He would have done; for the Son of the almighty Father is almighty. Let us prove it from the facts themselves. For when they wanted to seize Him, He departed from them; the Gospel says: And when they wanted to throw Him down from the brow of the mountain, He departed from them unharmed (Luke 4:29–30). And when they came to arrest Him, already sold by Judas the traitor, when that man supposed he had it in his power to hand over his master and Lord; there too the Lord showed that He suffered by will, not by necessity. For when the Jews wanted to arrest Him, He said to them: Whom do you seek? And they said: Jesus of Nazareth. And He: I am He. When this word was heard, they went backwards and fell (John 18:4–6). In that He threw them down by answering, He showed His power; so that in that He was arrested by them, He might show His will. Therefore that He suffered was of mercy. For He was delivered up for our offences, and rose again for our justification (Rom. 4:25). Hear His own words: I have power to lay down My life, and I have power to take it up again: no one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself, that I may take it up again (John 10:18). Since, then, He had such great power, since He proclaimed it in words and showed it in deeds, what does it mean that Jesus did not entrust Himself to them, as though they would do Him some harm against His will, or would do something to Him against His will, especially since they had already believed in His name? And of these very people the Evangelist says, They believed in His name, and of them he says, But Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them. Why? Because He knew all men, and because He had no need that anyone should bear testimony about man; for He Himself knew what was in man. The craftsman knew better what was in his work than the work itself knew what was in itself. The Creator of man knew what was in man, which the created man himself did not know. Do we not prove this from Peter, that he did not know what was in himself when he said, With Thee even unto death? Hear that the Lord knew what was in man: You with Me even unto death? Amen, amen I say to you, before the cock crows, you will deny Me three times (Matt. 26:33–34, and Luke 22:33–34). Man, then, did not know what was in himself; but the Creator of man knew what was in man. Yet many believed in His name, and Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them. What do we say, brethren? Perhaps what follows will show us what the mystery of these words means. That men had believed in Him is manifest, it is true: no one doubts it, the Gospel says it, the truthful Evangelist testifies to it. Likewise that Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them, this too is manifest, and no Christian doubts it: for this too the Gospel says, and the same truthful Evangelist testifies to it. Why then did those men believe in
Editors' notes and page, col. 1475

Page

  • running head: IN JOANNIS EVANGELIU[M] (cut off at the image edge); column number 1475
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "pterea", the rest of "propterea" broken from the previous column; "credebal" at line 1 read as credebat (damaged t); in the Luke quotation the italic "eum de vertice" has an indistinct first letter (could be read "cum"), set as eum; Matth. reference numerals faint, read XXVI, 33, 34
PL 35:1476
nomine ejus, et Jesus non credebat semetipsum illis? Sequentia videamus.
His name, and Jesus did not entrust Himself to them? Let us look at what follows.
3. Erat autem homo ex Pharisaeis, Nicodemus nomine, princeps Judaeorum: hic venit ad eum nocte, et dixit ei, Rabbi. Jam hoc nostis, quia Rabbi magister dicitur. Scimus quia a Deo venisti magister: nemo enim potest haec signa facere quae tu facis, nisi fuerit Deus cum eo. Ergo iste Nicodemus ex his erat qui crediderant in nomine ejus, videntes signa et prodigia quae faciebat. Superius enim hoc dixit: Cum autem esset Jerosolymis in Pascha in die festo, multi crediderunt in nomine ejus. Quare crediderunt? sequitur et dicit, videntes signa ejus quae faciebat. Et de Nicodemo quid dicit? Erat princeps Judaeorum, nomine Nicodemus: hic venit ad eum nocte, et ait illi, Rabbi, scimus quia a Deo venisti magister. Et iste ergo crediderat in nomine ejus. Et ipse unde crediderat? Sequitur, Nemo enim potest haec signa facere quae tu facis, nisi fuerit Deus cum eo. Si ergo Nicodemus de illis multis erat qui crediderant in nomine ejus, jam in isto Nicodemo attendamus quare Jesus non se credebat eis. Respondit Jesus, et dixit ei: Amen, amen dico tibi, nisi quis natus fuerit denuo, non potest videre regnum Dei. Ipsis ergo se credit Jesus, qui nati fuerint denuo. Ecce illi crediderant in eum, et Jesus non se credebat eis. Tales sunt omnes catechumeni: ipsi jam credunt in nomine Christi, sed Jesus non se credit eis. Intendat et intelligat Charitas vestra. Si dixerimus catechumeno, Credis in Christum? respondet, Credo, et signat se: jam crucem Christi portat in fronte, et non erubescit de cruce Domini sui. Ecce credidit in nomine ejus. Interrogemus eum, Manducas carnem Filii hominis, et bibis sanguinem Filii hominis? nescit quid dicimus, quia Jesus non se credidit ei.
3. Now there was a man of the Pharisees, Nicodemus by name, a ruler of the Jews: he came to Him by night, and said to Him, Rabbi. You already know this, that Rabbi means teacher. We know that You have come from God as a teacher: for no one can do these signs that You do, unless God be with him (John 3:1–2). So this Nicodemus was one of those who had believed in His name, seeing the signs and wonders that He was doing. For above, [the evangelist] said this: Now when He was in Jerusalem at the Passover, on the feast day, many believed in His name (John 2:23). Why did they believe? He goes on and says, seeing His signs that He was doing. And what does he say about Nicodemus? He was a ruler of the Jews, Nicodemus by name: he came to Him by night, and said to Him, Rabbi, we know that You have come from God as a teacher. So this man too had believed in His name. And on what ground had he believed? It follows, For no one can do these signs that You do, unless God be with him. If then Nicodemus was one of those many who had believed in His name, let us now attend, in this Nicodemus, to why Jesus did not entrust Himself to them. Jesus answered, and said to him: Amen, amen I say to you, unless one be born anew, he cannot see the kingdom of God (John 3:3). To those, then, does Jesus entrust Himself, who have been born anew. See, those men had believed in Him, and Jesus did not entrust Himself to them. Such are all catechumens: they already believe in the name of Christ, but Jesus does not entrust Himself to them. Let your Charity attend and understand. If we say to a catechumen, Do you believe in Christ? he answers, I believe, and signs himself: already he bears the cross of Christ on his forehead, and he is not ashamed of the cross of his Lord. See, he has believed in His name. Let us ask him, Do you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink the blood of the Son of Man? He does not know what we are saying, because Jesus has not entrusted Himself to him.
4. Cum ergo ex eo numero Nicodemus esset, venit ad Dominum: sed nocte venit; et hoc forte ad rem pertinet. Ad Dominum venit, et nocte venit: ad lucem venit, et in tenebris venit. Renati autem ex aqua et Spiritu, quid audiunt ab Apostolo? Fuistis aliquando tenebrae; nunc autem lux in Domino: sicut filii lucis ambulate (Ephes. V, 8): et iterum, Nos autem qui diei sumus, sobrii simus (I Thess. V, 8). Qui ergo renati sunt, noctis fuerunt, et diei sunt: tenebrae fuerunt, et lumen sunt. Jam credit se illis Jesus, et non nocte veniunt ad Jesum sicut Nicodemus, non in tenebris quaerunt diem. Tales enim jam etiam profitentur: accessit ad illos Jesus, fecit in illis salutem: quia ipse dixit: Nisi quis manducaverit carnem meam et biberit sanguinem meum, non habebit in se vitam (Joan. VI, 54). Et quod signum crucis habent in fronte catechumeni, jam de domo magna sunt; sed fiant ex servis filii. Non enim nihil sunt qui jam ad domum magnam pertinent. Quando autem manna manducavit populus Israel? Cum transisset mare rubrum. Mare autem rubrum quid significet, audi Apostolum: Nolo autem vos ignorare, fratres, quia omnes
4. Since, then, Nicodemus was of that number, he came to the Lord: but he came by night; and this perhaps bears on the matter. He came to the Lord, and he came by night: he came to the light, and he came in darkness. But those reborn of water and the Spirit, what do they hear from the Apostle? You were once darkness; but now light in the Lord: walk as children of light (Eph. 5:8): and again, But we who are of the day, let us be sober (1 Thess. 5:8). Those, then, who have been reborn were of the night, and are of the day: they were darkness, and are light. Now Jesus entrusts Himself to them, and they do not come to Jesus by night as Nicodemus did, they do not seek the day in darkness. For such men now also profess [Him]: Jesus has drawn near to them, He has wrought salvation in them: for He Himself said: Unless one eat my flesh and drink my blood, he shall not have life in himself (John 6:54). And because the catechumens have the sign of the cross on their forehead, they are already of the great house; but let them become sons instead of servants. For they are not nothing who already belong to the great house. But when did the people of Israel eat the manna? When they had crossed the Red Sea. And what the Red Sea signifies, hear the Apostle: Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that all
Editors' notes and page, col. 1476

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: portat in fronte› · call in col 1476

Sic plerique Mss. cum editis Bad. et Am. At Er. et Lov., signat se cruce Christi, portat, etc. Nonnulli e Mss., portans.

So most manuscripts, with the Badius and Amerbach editions. But Erasmus and the Louvain edition: "he signs himself with the cross of Christ, he carries," etc. Some of the manuscripts: "carrying."

(printed under page 86)

Page

  • running head: NIS EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1476 (cut off at the left edge of the image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1477
patres nostri sub nube fuerunt, et omnes per mare transierunt. Utquid per mare transierunt, quasi quaereres ab illo; secutus ait, Et omnes per Moysen baptizati sunt in nube et in mari (I Cor. X, 1, 2). Si ergo figura maris tantum valuit, species Baptismi quantum valebit? Si quod gestum est in figura, trajectum populum ad manna perduxit; quid exhibebit Christus in veritate baptismi sui, trajecto per eum populo suo? Per baptismum suum trajicit credentes, occisis omnibus peccatis, tanquam hostibus consequentibus, sicut in illo mari omnes Aegyptii perierunt. Quo trajicit, fratres mei? quo trajicit per Baptismum Jesus, cujus figuram tunc gerebat Moyses, qui per mare trajiciebat? quo trajicit? Ad manna. Quod est manna? Ego sum, inquit, panis vivus, qui de coelo descendi (Joan. VI, 51). Manna accipiunt fideles, jam trajecti per mare rubrum. Quare mare rubrum? jam mare, quare et rubrum? Significabat mare illud rubrum baptismum Christi. Unde rubet baptismus Christi, nisi Christi sanguine consecratus? Quo ergo perducit credentes et baptizatos? Ad manna. Ecce dico manna: notum est quid acceperint Judaei, populus iste Israel, notum est quid illis pluisset Deus de coelo; et nesciunt catechumeni quid accipiant Christiani. Erubescant ergo, quia nesciunt; transeant per mare rubrum, manducent manna: ut quomodo crediderunt in nomine Jesu, sic se ipsis credat Jesus.
our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea. To what purpose did they pass through the sea? as though you were asking him; he went on and said, And all were baptized through Moses in the cloud and in the sea (1 Cor. 10:1–2). If, then, the figure of the sea availed so much, how much will the reality of Baptism avail? If what was done in figure brought the people, once carried across, to the manna, what will Christ bestow in the truth of His baptism, when His people have been carried across through Him? Through His baptism He carries the believers across, all their sins being slain, like enemies in pursuit, just as in that sea all the Egyptians perished. Whither does He carry them across, my brothers? whither does Jesus carry them across through Baptism, Jesus whose figure Moses then bore, who carried them across through the sea? whither does He carry them across? To the manna. What is the manna? I am, He says, the living bread, Who came down from heaven (John 6:51). The faithful receive the manna, having now been carried across through the Red Sea. Why the Red Sea? granted it is a sea, why also red? That Red Sea signified the baptism of Christ. Whence is the baptism of Christ red, unless because it is consecrated by the blood of Christ? Whither, then, does He bring the believers and the baptized? To the manna. See, I say manna: it is known what the Jews received, that people Israel, it is known what God had rained upon them from heaven; and the catechumens do not know what Christians receive. Let them blush, then, because they do not know; let them pass through the Red Sea, let them eat the manna: so that, as they have believed in the name of Jesus, so Jesus may entrust Himself to them.
5. Ideo intendite, fratres mei, quid respondeat iste qui nocte venit ad Jesum. Quamvis ad Jesum venerit, tamen quia nocte venit, adhuc de tenebris carnis suae loquitur. Non intelligit quod audit a Domino, non intelligit quod audit a luce, quae illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum (Id. I, 9). Jam ei Dominus dixit, Nisi quis natus fuerit denuo, non videbit regnum Dei. Dicit ad eum Nicodemus: Quomodo potest homo nasci cum sit senex? Spiritus ei loquitur, et ille carnem sapit. Carnem suam sapit, quia carnem Christi nondum sapit. Cum enim dixisset Dominus Jesus, Nisi quis manducaverit carnem meam, et biberit sanguinem meum, non habebit in se vitam; scandalizati sunt quidam qui eum sequebantur, et dixerunt apud semetipsos, Durus est hic sermo; quis potest eum audire? Putabant enim hoc dicere Jesum, quod eum possent concisum sicut agnum coquere, et manducare: abhorrentes a verbis ejus, recesserunt, et amplius eum non sunt secuti. Sic Evangelista loquitur: Et Dominus ipse remansit cum duodecim: et illi ad eum, Domine, ecce illi dimiserunt te; et ille, Numquid et vos vultis abire? Ostendere volens quia ipse illis erat necessarius, non illi erant Christo necessarii. Ne quis terreat Christum, quando dicitur ut sit christianus; quasi beatior erit Christus, si tu fueris christianus. Bonum est tibi, ut sis christianus: nam si non fueris, malum Christo non erit. Audi vocem Psalmi: Dixi Domino, Deus meus es tu, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges (Psal. XV, 2). Ideo Deus meus es
5. Therefore attend, my brothers, to what he answers who came to Jesus by night. Although he came to Jesus, yet because he came by night, he still speaks out of the darkness of his flesh. He does not understand what he hears from the Lord, he does not understand what he hears from the light, which enlightens every man coming into this world (John 1:9). The Lord has already said to him, Unless one is born anew, he will not see the kingdom of God. Nicodemus says to Him: How can a man be born when he is old? The Spirit speaks to him, and he savours of the flesh. He savours of his own flesh, because he does not yet savour the flesh of Christ. For when the Lord Jesus had said, Unless one eats My flesh and drinks My blood, he will not have life in him, some who were following Him were scandalized, and said among themselves, This is a hard saying; who can listen to it? For they thought that Jesus was saying this, that they could cut Him up like a lamb, cook Him and eat Him: shrinking from His words, they went away, and followed Him no longer. Thus the Evangelist speaks: And the Lord Himself remained with the twelve: and they [said] to Him, Lord, see, those men have left Thee; and He, Do you too wish to go away? wishing to show that He was necessary to them, not that they were necessary to Christ. Let no one think to frighten Christ when he is told to be a Christian, as though Christ will be more blessed if you become a Christian. It is good for you that you be a Christian: for if you do not become one, it will be no harm to Christ. Hear the voice of the Psalm: I said to the Lord, Thou art my God, since Thou hast no need of my goods (Ps. 15:2). Therefore Thou art my God
Editors' notes and page, col. 1477

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1477

Editi, trajiciebat. At Mss., trajicit.

The printed editions have trajiciebat ("he was carrying across"). The manuscripts, however, have trajicit ("he carries across").

(printed under page 87)

(2) ‹anchor: Spiritus ei loquitur› · call in col 1477

Quatuor Mss., Christus ei loquitur.

Four manuscripts: Christus ei loquitur ("Christ speaks to him").

(printed under page 87)

(3) ‹anchor: Numquid et vos vultis abire› · call in col 1477

Mss. hic et infra vultis ire.

The manuscripts, here and below: vultis ire ("do you wish to go").

(printed under page 87)

Page

  • running head: 1477 TRACTATUS X. CAP (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1478
tu, quoniam bonorum meorum non eges. Si fueris sine Deo, minor eris; si fueris cum Deo, major Deus non erit. Non ex te ille major, sed tu sine illo minor. Cresce ergo in illo, noli te subtrahere, ut quasi ille deficiat. Reficieris, si accesseris; deficies, si recesseris. Integer manet te accedente, integer manet et te cadente. Cum ergo dixisset discipulis, Numquid et vos vultis abire? respondit Petrus, petra illa, voce omnium, Domine, ad quem ibimus? Verba vitae aeternae habes. Bene sapuit in ore ipsius caro Domini. Dominus autem exposuit eis, et dixit, Spiritus est qui vivificat: cum dixisset, Nisi quis manducaverit carnem meam, et biberit sanguinem meum, non habebit in se vitam; ne carnaliter intelligerent, Spiritus est, inquit, qui vivificat, caro autem nihil prodest: verba quae locutus sum vobis, spiritus est et vita (Joan. VI, 54-69).
since Thou hast no need of my goods. If you are without God, you will be less; if you are with God, God will not be greater. He is not greater because of you, but you are less without Him. Grow, therefore, in Him; do not withdraw yourself, as though He would fail. You will be refreshed if you approach; you will fail if you withdraw. He remains whole when you approach, He remains whole also when you fall away. When, therefore, He had said to the disciples, Do you also wish to go away? Peter, that rock, answered with the voice of all, Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life. The flesh of the Lord had a good savour in his mouth. But the Lord explained to them and said, It is the Spirit that gives life: when He had said, Unless anyone eats My flesh and drinks My blood, he will not have life in himself, lest they should understand carnally, It is the Spirit, He said, that gives life, but the flesh profits nothing: the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life (John 6:54–69).
6. Hunc spiritum et hanc vitam non sapiebat iste Nicodemus, qui nocte venerat ad Jesum. Ait ei Jesus: Nisi quis natus fuerit denuo, non videbit regnum Dei. Et ille carnem suam sapiens, in cujus ore nondum sapiebat caro Christi: Quomodo, inquit, potest homo, cum sit senex, iterum nasci? Numquid potest in ventrem matris suae iterum introire, et nasci? Non noverat iste nisi unam nativitatem ex Adam et Eva; ex Deo et Ecclesia nondum noverat: non noverat nisi eos parentes qui generant ad mortem; nondum noverat eos parentes qui generant ad vitam: non noverat nisi eos parentes qui generant successuros; nondum noverat eos qui semper viventes generant permansuros. Cum ergo sint duae nativitates, ille unam intelligebat. Una est de terra, alia de coelo; una est de carne, alia de Spiritu; una est de mortalitate, alia de aeternitate; una est de masculo et femina, alia de Deo et Ecclesia. Sed ipsae duae singulae sunt; nec illa potest repeti, nec illa. Recte intellexit Nicodemus nativitatem carnis: sic et tu intellige nativitatem spiritus, quomodo intellexit Nicodemus nativitatem carnis. Quid Nicodemus intellexit? Numquid potest homo denuo in ventrem matris suae intrare, et nasci? Sic, quicumque tibi dixerit ut spiritualiter iterum nascaris, responde quod dixit Nicodemus, Numquid potest homo iterum in ventrem matris suae intrare, et nasci? Jam natus sum de Adam, non me potest iterum generare Adam: jam natus sum de Christo, non me potest iterum generare Christus. Quomodo uterus non potest repeti, sic nec Baptismus.
6. This spirit and this life that Nicodemus did not savour, he who had come to Jesus by night. Jesus says to him: Unless anyone has been born anew, he will not see the kingdom of God. And he, savouring his own flesh, in whose mouth the flesh of Christ did not yet have savour: How, he says, can a man be born again when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother's womb and be born? He knew of only one birth, from Adam and Eve; of the birth from God and the Church he did not yet know: he knew only those parents who beget unto death; he did not yet know those parents who beget unto life: he knew only those parents who beget successors; he did not yet know those who, ever living, beget those who will abide. Since, then, there are two births, he understood one. One is of earth, the other of heaven; one is of the flesh, the other of the Spirit; one is of mortality, the other of eternity; one is of male and female, the other of God and the Church. But these two are each single; neither the one can be repeated, nor the other. Nicodemus rightly understood the birth of the flesh: so do you too understand the birth of the spirit, as Nicodemus understood the birth of the flesh. What did Nicodemus understand? Can a man enter anew into his mother's womb and be born? So, whoever tells you to be born again spiritually, answer what Nicodemus said: Can a man enter again into his mother's womb and be born? I have already been born of Adam; Adam cannot beget me again: I have already been born of Christ; Christ cannot beget me again. As the womb cannot be repeated, so neither can Baptism.
7. Qui nascitur de Ecclesia catholica, tanquam de Sara nascitur, de libera nascitur: qui nascitur de haeresi, tanquam de ancilla nascitur, sed ex semine Abraham. Advertat Charitas vestra quam magnum sacramentum. Testatur Deus, et dicit, Ego sum Deus Abraham, et Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob. Non erant alii patriarchae? non erat ante istos sanctus Noe, qui solus in toto genere humano cum tota domo sua meruit de diluvio liberari, in quo et in filiis ejus figurata est Ecclesia? Ligno portante evadunt diluvium (Gen. VII, 7). Deinde postea magni quos novimus, quos sancta Scriptura
7. He who is born of the Catholic Church is born as if of Sarah; he is born of the free woman: he who is born of heresy is born as if of the bondwoman, but of the seed of Abraham. Let your Charity mark how great a mystery [this is]. God testifies and says, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. Were there not other patriarchs? Was there not, before these, holy Noah, who alone in the whole human race, with his whole household, was found worthy to be delivered from the flood, in whom and in whose sons the Church was prefigured? With wood bearing them they escape the flood (Gen. 7:7). Then afterwards great men whom we know, whom holy Scripture
Editors' notes and page, col. 1478

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: tanquam de Sara› · call in col 1478

In Mss. hic et alibi constanter, Sarra, cum duplici rr.

In the manuscripts, here and elsewhere consistently, Sarra, with a double rr.

(printed under page 87)

Page

  • running head: [TRAC]TATUS X. CAPUT II. 1478
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the word Scriptura was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1479
PL 35:1479
commendat, Moyses fidelis in tota domo ejus (Num. XII, 7). Et illi tres nominantur, quasi eum soli promeruerint, Ego sum Deus Abraham, et Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob: hoc mihi nomen est in aeternum (Exod. III, 6, 15). Sacramentum grande! Potens est Dominus et ora nostra aperire, et corda vestra, ut dicere possimus sicut revelare dignatus est, et capere possitis sicut expedit vobis.
commends, Moses faithful in all his house (Num. 12:7). And those three are named, as though they alone had merited Him: I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob: this is My name for ever (Exod. 3:6, 15). A great mystery! The Lord is able to open both our mouths and your hearts, so that we may speak as He has deigned to reveal, and you may grasp as is expedient for you.
8. Tres ergo isti patriarchae, Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob. Jam nostis filii Jacob quia duodecim fuerunt, et inde populus Israel: quia ipse Jacob Israel, et populus Israel tribus duodecim, pertinentes ad duodecim filios Israel. Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob, tres patres, et populus unus. Tres patres tanquam in principio populi; tres patres in quibus figurabatur populus: et populus ipse prior, praesens populus. In populo enim Judaeorum figuratus est populus Christianorum. Ibi figura, hic veritas: ibi umbra, hic corpus, dicente Apostolo, Haec autem in figura contingebant illis. Vox est Apostoli: Scripta sunt, inquit, propter nos, in quos finis saeculorum obvenit (I Cor. X, 11). Recurrat nunc animus vester ad Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob. In istis tribus invenimus parere liberas, parere et ancillas: invenimus ibi partus liberarum, invenimus ibi et partus ancillarum. Ancilla nihil boni significat: Ejice ancillam, inquit, et filium ejus; non enim haeres erit filius ancillae cum filio liberae. Apostolus hoc commemorat; et in illis duobus filiis Abrahae, dicit Apostolus fuisse figuram duorum Testamentorum, Veteris et Novi. Ad Vetus Testamentum pertinent dilectores temporalium, dilectores saeculi: ad Novum Testamentum dilectores vitae aeternae. Ideo illa Jerusalem in terra, umbra erat coelestis Jerusalem matris omnium nostrum, quae est in coelo: et haec Apostoli verba sunt (Gen. XXI, 10; Galat. IV, 22-30). Et de ista civitate unde peregrinamur, multa nostis, multa jam audistis. Invenimus autem rem miram in istis partubus, id est in istis fetibus, in istis generationibus liberarum et ancillarum, quatuor scilicet genera hominum: in quibus quatuor generibus, completur figura futuri populi christiani, ut non sit mirum quod in illis tribus dictum est, Ego sum Deus Abraham, et Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob. In omnibus enim Christianis, fratres intendite, aut per malos nascuntur boni, aut per bonos nascuntur mali, aut per bonos boni, aut per malos mali: amplius istis quatuor generibus non potestis invenire. Quae iterum repetam, advertite, retinete; excutite corda vestra, nolite pigri esse: capite, ne capiamini, quomodo quatuor genera sunt omnium Christianorum. Aut per bonos nascuntur boni, aut per malos nascuntur mali, aut per bonos mali, aut per malos boni. Puto quia planum est. Per bonos boni: si et qui baptizant, boni sunt; et qui baptizantur, recte credunt, et in membris Christi recte numerantur. Per malos mali: si et qui baptizant, mali sunt; et qui baptizantur, duplici corde accedunt ad Deum, et non tenent eos mores quos audiunt in Ecclesia,
8. These three, then, are the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. You already know that the sons of Jacob were twelve, and from them came the people Israel: for Jacob himself is Israel, and the people Israel is twelve tribes, belonging to the twelve sons of Israel. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, three fathers, and one people. Three fathers as at the beginning of the people; three fathers in whom the people was prefigured: both the former people itself and the present people. For in the people of the Jews the people of the Christians was prefigured. There the figure, here the truth: there the shadow, here the body, as the Apostle says, Now these things befell them in figure. It is the voice of the Apostle: They were written, he says, for us, upon whom the end of the ages has come (1 Cor. 10:11). Let your mind now run back to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. In these three we find free women bearing, and maidservants bearing too: we find there the offspring of free women, we find there also the offspring of maidservants. The maidservant signifies nothing good: Cast out, it says, the maidservant and her son; for the son of the maidservant shall not be heir with the son of the free woman. The Apostle recalls this; and in those two sons of Abraham, the Apostle says, there was a figure of the two Testaments, the Old and the New. To the Old Testament belong the lovers of temporal things, the lovers of the world: to the New Testament the lovers of eternal life. Therefore that Jerusalem on earth was a shadow of the heavenly Jerusalem, the mother of us all, which is in heaven: and these are the Apostle's words (Gen. 21:10; Gal. 4:22–30). And about that city from which we are on pilgrimage you know many things, you have already heard many things. But we find a wonderful thing in these births, that is, in these offspring, in these generations of free women and maidservants, namely four kinds of men: in which four kinds is fulfilled the figure of the future Christian people, so that it is not surprising that in the case of those three it was said, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. For in all Christians, brethren, pay attention, either the good are born through the bad, or the bad are born through the good, or the good through the good, or the bad through the bad: beyond these four kinds you cannot find any. I shall repeat these things again: take note, retain them; shake out your hearts, do not be sluggish: grasp, lest you be caught, how there are four kinds of all Christians. Either the good are born through the good, or the bad are born through the bad, or the bad through the good, or the good through the bad. I think it is plain. The good through the good: if both those who baptize are good, and those who are baptized believe rightly and are rightly numbered among the members of Christ. The bad through the bad: if both those who baptize are bad, and those who are baptized approach God with a double heart and do not keep those morals which they hear in the Church,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1479

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1479

In Mss. hic post vocem, Jacob, non additur, tres patres; neque, item, post voces, et populus.

In the manuscripts, after the word Jacob, tres patres ("three fathers") is not added here; nor, likewise, after the words et populus ("and the people"). [The word read here as "item" is unclear on the scan.]

(printed under page 88)

Page

  • running head: 1479 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1480
ut non ibi sint palea, sed frumentum. Quam enim multi sint, novit Charitas vestra. Per malos boni: aliquando baptizat adulter, et qui baptizatur justificatur. Per bonos mali: aliquando qui baptizant, sancti sunt; qui baptizantur, tenere viam Dei nolunt.
so that there may be no chaff there, but wheat. For how many they are, your Charity knows. The good through the bad: sometimes an adulterer baptizes, and he who is baptized is justified. The bad through the good: sometimes those who baptize are holy; those who are baptized are unwilling to keep the way of God.
9. Puto, fratres, notum esse in Ecclesia, et quotidianis exemplis manifestari ea quae dicimus: sed in prioribus nostris patribus ea consideremus, quia habuerunt et illi ista quatuor genera. Per bonos boni: Ananias Paulum baptizavit (Act. IX, 18). Quid per malos mali? Dicit Apostolus quosdam praedicatores Evangelii, quos dicit non caste annuntiare solere Evangelium, quos tolerat in societate christiana, et dicit, Quid enim? dum omni modo, sive occasione, sive veritate Christus annuntietur, et in hoc gaudeo (Philipp. I, 18). Numquid malevolus erat, et de alieno malo gaudebat? Sed quia et per malos verum praedicabatur, et per malorum ora Christus praedicabatur; si quos isti sui similes baptizabant, mali malos baptizabant: si quos isti baptizabant tales, quales admonet Dominus cum dicit, Quae dicunt facite; quae autem faciunt, facere nolite (Matth. XXIII, 3), mali bonos baptizabant. Boni malos baptizabant, quomodo a Philippo sancto Simon magus baptizatus est (Act. VIII, 13). Nota sunt ergo ista quatuor genera, fratres mei. Ecce iterum ea repeto, tenete illa, numerate illa, advertite illa; cavete quae mala sunt, tenete quae bona sunt. Per bonos boni nascuntur, cum per sanctos sancti baptizantur: per malos mali, cum et qui baptizant et qui baptizantur, inique et impie vivunt: per malos boni, cum mali sunt qui baptizant; et boni qui baptizantur: per bonos mali, cum boni sunt qui baptizant, et mali qui baptizantur.
9. I think, brethren, that what we are saying is known in the Church and made plain by daily examples; but let us consider these things in our earlier fathers, because they too had these four kinds. The good through the good: Ananias baptized Paul (Acts 9:18). What of the bad through the bad? The Apostle speaks of certain preachers of the Gospel, of whom he says that they were wont to proclaim the Gospel not purely, whom he tolerates in the Christian fellowship, and he says, What then? provided that in every way, whether by pretext or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, in this too I rejoice (Phil. 1:18). Was he malevolent, and did he rejoice at another's evil? But because the truth was preached even through the bad, and Christ was preached through the mouths of the bad, if these men baptized any like themselves, the bad baptized the bad; if these men baptized such as the Lord admonishes when He says, What they say, do; but what they do, do not do (Matt. 23:3), the bad baptized the good. The good baptized the bad, as Simon Magus was baptized by the holy Philip (Acts 8:13). These four kinds, then, are known, my brethren. See, I repeat them again: hold them, count them, mark them; beware of what is bad, hold to what is good. The good are born through the good when the holy are baptized by the holy; the bad through the bad, when both those who baptize and those who are baptized live wickedly and impiously; the good through the bad, when those who baptize are bad, and those who are baptized are good; the bad through the good, when those who baptize are good, and those who are baptized are bad.
10. Quomodo invenimus ista in tribus istis nominibus, Ego sum Deus Abraham, Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob? Ancillas accipimus in malis, liberas accipimus in bonis: pariunt liberae bonos; Sara peperit Isaac (Gen. XXI, 3): pariunt ancillae malos; Agar peperit Ismael (Id. XVI, 15). Habemus in uno Abraham et illud genus cum per bonos boni, et illud genus cum per malos mali. Per bonos mali ubi figurati sunt? Libera erat Rebecca uxor Isaac: legite, peperit geminos, unus erat bonus, alter malus. Habes aperte Scripturam dicentem Dei voce, Jacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui (Malach. I, 2, 3; Rom. IX, 13). Istos duos genuit Rebecca, Jacob et Esau: unus inde eligitur, alius reprobatur; unus succedit in haereditatem, alter exhaereditatur. Non facit populum suum Deus de Esau; sed facit de Jacob. Semen unum, diversi qui concepti sunt: uterus unus, diversi qui nati sunt. Numquid non libera peperit Jacob, quae libera peperit Esau? Luctabantur in ventre matris suae, et dictum est Rebeccae, cum ibi luctarentur, Duo populi sunt in utero tuo (Gen. XXV, 22-24). Duo homines, duo populi; bonus populus, malus populus: sed tamen in uno ventre luctantur. Quanti mali sunt in Ecclesia, et unus uterus portat, donec in fine discernantur: et
10. How do we find these things in those three names, I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? We take the bondwomen as standing for the bad, the free women for the good: free women bear good sons; Sarah bore Isaac (Gen. 21:3): bondwomen bear bad sons; Hagar bore Ishmael (Gen. 16:15). We have in Abraham alone both that kind when the good come through the good, and that kind when the bad come through the bad. Where are the bad through the good figured? Rebecca, the wife of Isaac, was free: read, she bore twins; one was good, the other bad. You have Scripture saying openly with the voice of God, Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated (Mal. 1:2–3; Rom. 9:13). These two Rebecca bore, Jacob and Esau: one of them is chosen, the other rejected; one succeeds to the inheritance, the other is disinherited. God does not make His people out of Esau, but He makes it out of Jacob. One seed, yet those conceived were different: one womb, yet those born were different. Did not the free woman who bore Jacob bear Esau too? They struggled in their mother's womb, and it was said to Rebecca, while they struggled there, Two peoples are in your womb (Gen. 25:22–24). Two men, two peoples; a good people, a bad people: but yet they struggle in one womb. How many bad there are in the Church, and one womb carries them, until they are separated at the end: and
Editors' notes and page, col. 1480

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: alius reprobatur› · call in col 1480

Mss., improbatur.

The manuscripts: improbatur ("is rejected").

(printed under page 88)

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1480 (left part of head cut off at image edge; column number faintly printed)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1481
⟨b⟩oni adversus malos clamant, et mali adversus bonos reclamant, et in unius visceribus utrique luctantur. Numquid semper simul erunt? In fine exitur ad lucem, declaratur nativitas quae hic in sacramento figuratur: et tunc apparebit, Jacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui.
the good cry out against the bad, and the bad cry back against the good, and in the womb of one both struggle. Will they always be together? At the end there is a going forth into the light; the birth that is figured here in a sacrament is made manifest; and then it will appear: Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.
11. Jam ergo invenimus, fratres, et de bonis bonos, de libera Isaac: et de malis malos, de ancilla Ismael: et de bonis malos, Esau de Rebecca. De malis bonos ubi inveniemus? Restat Jacob, ut in tribus patriarchis quatuor generum istorum perfectio concludatur. Habuit uxores Jacob liberas, habuit et ancillas: pariunt liberae, pariunt et ancillae, et fiunt duodecim filii Israel (Gen. XXIX, XXX, XXXV). Si numeres omnes de quibus nati sunt, non omnes de liberis, non omnes de ancillis: sed tamen omnes ex uno semine. Quid ergo, fratres mei? numquid qui nati sunt de ancillis, non simul possederunt terram promissionis cum fratribus suis? Invenimus ibi bonos filios Jacob natos de ancillis, et bonos filios Jacob natos de liberis. Nihil illis obfuit nativitas de uteris ancillarum, quando in patre cognoverunt semen suum, et consequenter regnum cum fratribus tenuerunt. Quomodo ergo in filiis Jacob non obfuit illis qui nati sunt de ancillis, quominus tenerent regnum, et terram promissionis cum fratribus ex aequo acciperent; non illis obfuerunt natales ancillarum, sed praevaluit semen paternum: sic quicumque per malos baptizantur, tanquam de ancillis videntur nati; sed tamen quia ex semine verbi Dei, quod figuratur in Jacob, non contristentur, simul haereditatem cum fratribus possidebunt. Securus ergo sit qui de semine bono nascitur; tantum non imitetur ancillam, si de ancilla nascitur. Ancillam malam superbientem non imiteris. Unde enim filii Jacob de ancillis nati, possederunt terram promissionis cum fratribus, Ismael autem de ancilla natus, expulsus est ab haereditate? Unde, nisi quia ille superbus erat, illi humiles? Erexit ille cervicem, et voluit seducere fratrem suum, ludens cum illo.
11. So now we have found, brethren, both good from good, Isaac from the free woman; and bad from bad, Ismael from the bondwoman; and bad from good, Esau from Rebecca. Where shall we find good from bad? Jacob remains, so that in the three patriarchs the completion of these four kinds may be rounded off. Jacob had wives who were free, he had also bondwomen: the free women bear, the bondwomen also bear, and the twelve sons of Israel come to be (Gen. 29, 30, 35). If you count all of those from whom they were born, not all were from free women, not all from bondwomen; but yet all were from one seed. What then, my brethren? Did those who were born of bondwomen not possess the land of promise together with their brothers? We find there good sons of Jacob born of bondwomen, and good sons of Jacob born of free women. Birth from the wombs of bondwomen did them no harm, since they acknowledged their seed in their father, and consequently they held the kingdom with their brothers. As therefore among the sons of Jacob it did not harm those who were born of bondwomen, so as to prevent their holding the kingdom and receiving the land of promise on equal terms with their brothers; their birth from bondwomen did not harm them, but the father's seed prevailed: so whoever are baptized by bad men seem as it were to be born of bondwomen; but yet, because they are of the seed of the word of God, which is figured in Jacob, let them not be saddened: they will possess the inheritance together with their brothers. Let him therefore be secure who is born of good seed; only let him not imitate the bondwoman, if he is born of a bondwoman. Do not imitate the bad, proud bondwoman. For why did the sons of Jacob born of bondwomen possess the land of promise with their brothers, whereas Ismael, born of a bondwoman, was driven out from the inheritance? Why, unless because he was proud, they humble? He raised up his neck, and wished to lead his brother astray, playing with him.
12. Magnum ibi sacramentum. Ludebant simul Ismael et Isaac; vidit illos Sara ludentes, et ait Abrahae: Ejice ancillam et filium ejus; non enim haeres erit filius ancillae cum filio meo Isaac. Et cum contristatus esset Abraham, confirmavit ei Dominus dictum uxoris ejus. Jam hic manifestum est sacramentum, quia nescio quid futurum parturiebat illa res gesta. Ludentes vidit, et dicit: Ejice ancillam et filium ejus. Quid est hoc, fratres? Quid enim mali fecerat Ismael puero Isaac, quia ludebat cum illo? Sed illa lusio, illusio erat; illa lusio deceptionem significabat. Nam magnum sacramentum attendat Charitas vestra. Persecutionem illam vocat Apostolus; ipsam lusionem, ipsum lusum persecutionem vocat: ait enim, Sed sicut tunc ille qui secundum carnem natus erat, persequebatur eum qui secundum spiritum, ita et nunc; id est, qui secundum carnem nati sunt, persequuntur eos qui secundum spiritum nati sunt. Qui sunt secundum carnem nati? Dilectores mundi, amatores saeculi. Qui sunt secundum spiritum nati? Amatores regni coelorum, dilectores Christi, desiderantes vitam aeternam,
12. There is a great sacrament there. Ismael and Isaac were playing together; Sara saw them playing, and said to Abraham: Cast out the bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with my son Isaac. And when Abraham was saddened, the Lord confirmed to him the saying of his wife. Here now the sacrament is manifest, because that event was in labour with something or other that was to come. She saw them playing, and says: Cast out the bondwoman and her son. What is this, brethren? For what harm had Ismael done to the boy Isaac, in that he was playing with him? But that playing was a mocking; that playing signified deception. For let your Charity attend to a great sacrament. The Apostle calls it persecution; that very playing, that very game, he calls persecution: for he says, But as then he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the spirit, so also now; that is, those who are born according to the flesh persecute those who are born according to the spirit. Who are those born according to the flesh? Lovers of the world, lovers of the age. Who are those born according to the spirit? Lovers of the kingdom of heaven, lovers of Christ, those who long for eternal life,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1481

Page

  • running head: 1481 TRACTATUS XI. CAP[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: first word's initial looks like "L" (damaged b), set ⟨b⟩oni; last word "aeter-" split at the column break (aeternam); right-hand column partly visible in the images is the next column, not set; printer's signature "PATROL. XXXV." not set
  • other: the word aeternam, was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1482
PL 35:1482
gratis colentes Deum. Ludunt, et dicit Apostolus persecutionem. Nam posteaquam dixit haec verba Apostolus, Et sicut tunc ille qui secundum carnem natus erat, persequebatur eum qui secundum spiritum, ita et nunc; secutus est, et ostendit de qua persecutione diceret: Sed quid dicit Scriptura? Ejice ancillam et filium ejus; non enim haeres erit filius ancillae cum filio meo Isaac (Gen. XXI, 9-12; Galat. IV, 29, 30). Quaerimus ubi hoc dicat Scriptura, ut videamus utrum aliqua persecutio praecesserit Ismaelis in Isaac: et invenimus hoc dictum esse a Sara, quando vidit pueros ludentes simul. Quam lusionem dicit Scriptura vidisse Saram, hanc persecutionem dicit Apostolus. Plus ergo vos persequuntur qui vos illudendo seducunt: Veni, veni; baptizare hic, hic habes verum baptismum. Noli ludere, unus est verus; ille lusus est: seduceris, et ista persecutio gravis tibi erit. Melius tibi erat ut Ismaelem tu lucrareris ad regnum; sed non vult Ismael, quia ludere vult. Tene tu haereditatem patris, et audi: Ejice ancillam et filium ejus; non enim haeres erit filius ancillae cum filio meo Isaac.
worshipping God freely. They play, and the Apostle calls it persecution. For after the Apostle had said these words, And just as then he who had been born according to the flesh persecuted him who [was born] according to the spirit, so also now; he followed on and showed what persecution he meant: But what does Scripture say? Cast out the maidservant and her son; for the son of the maidservant shall not be heir with my son Isaac (Gen. 21:9–12; Gal. 4:29–30). We ask where Scripture says this, so that we may see whether some persecution of Isaac by Ishmael went before it: and we find that this was said by Sarah when she saw the boys playing together. The play which Scripture says Sarah saw, this the Apostle calls persecution. Those, then, persecute you more who lead you astray by mocking you: Come, come; be baptized here, here you have the true baptism. Do not play; there is one true [baptism]; that one is a mockery: you will be led astray, and that persecution will be grievous for you. It would have been better for you to win Ishmael over to the kingdom; but Ishmael does not want it, because he wants to play. Hold fast, you, to the inheritance of the father, and hear: Cast out the maidservant and her son; for the son of the maidservant shall not be heir with my son Isaac.
13. Isti etiam audent dicere quia persecutionem solent pati a catholicis regibus, aut a catholicis principibus. Quam persecutionem tolerant? Afflictionem corporis: si tamen aliquando passi sunt, aut quomodo passi sunt, ipsi sciant, et conveniant conscientias suas; tamen afflictionem corporis passi sunt: persecutio quam faciunt gravior est. Cave quando vult ludere Ismael cum Isaac, quando tibi blanditur, quando offert alterum baptismum: responde, Habeo jam Baptismum. Si enim verus est iste baptismus, qui tibi vult dare alterum, illudere te vult. Cave animae persecutorem. Nam si a principibus catholicis aliquid passa est pars Donati aliquando, secundum corpus passa est, non secundum illusionem spiritus. Audite et videte in ipsis veteribus factis, omnia futurarum rerum signa et indicia. Invenitur Sara afflixisse Agar ancillam: Sara libera est: posteaquam superbire coepit ancilla, questa est Abrahae Sara, et dixit, Ejice ancillam; erexit adversum me cervicem suam. Et quasi ab Abraham fieret, de Abraham questa est mulier. Abraham vero qui non in ancilla libidine abutendi tenebatur, sed officio generandi, quoniam Sara ei dederat unde prolem susciperet, ait ei: Ecce ancilla tua, utere ea sicut vis. Et afflixit eam graviter Sara, et fugit a facie ejus. Ecce libera afflixit ancillam, et non illam vocat persecutionem Apostolus; ludit servus cum domino, et persecutionem vocat: afflictio ista non vocatur persecutio, et lusio illa vocatur persecutio. Quid vobis videtur, fratres? Nonne intelligitis quid significatum sit? Sic ergo quando vult Deus concitare potestates adversus haereticos, adversus schismaticos, adversus dissipatores Ecclesiae, adversus exsufflatores Christi, adversus blasphematores Baptismi, non mirentur; quia Deus concitat, ut a Sara verberetur Agar. Cognoscat se Agar, ponat cervicem: quia cum humiliata discederet a domina sua, occurrit ei angelus, et dixit, Quid est, Agar ancilla
13. These men even dare to say that they are accustomed to suffer persecution from Catholic kings, or from Catholic princes. What persecution do they endure? Affliction of the body: yet if they have ever suffered it, or how they have suffered it, let them themselves know, and let them consult their own consciences; still, it is affliction of the body that they have suffered: the persecution which they inflict is graver. Beware when Ishmael wants to play with Isaac, when he flatters you, when he offers another baptism: answer, I already have Baptism. For if this baptism is true, he who wants to give you another wants to mock you. Beware the persecutor of the soul. For if the party of Donatus has at some time suffered something from Catholic princes, it has suffered according to the body, not according to the mockery of the spirit. Hear and see in these very deeds of old all the signs and indications of things to come. Sarah is found to have afflicted Hagar the maidservant: Sarah is the free woman: after the maidservant began to grow proud, Sarah complained to Abraham, and said, Cast out the maidservant; she has raised her neck against me. And as though it were being done by Abraham, the woman complained about Abraham. But Abraham, who was held to the maidservant not by a lust for misusing her but by the duty of begetting, since Sarah had given him the means of receiving offspring, said to her: Behold your maidservant, use her as you will. And Sarah afflicted her severely, and she fled from her face. Behold, the free woman afflicted the maidservant, and the Apostle does not call that persecution; the servant plays with the master, and he calls it persecution: that affliction is not called persecution, and that play is called persecution. What does it seem to you, brethren? Do you not understand what has been signified? So, then, when God wills to stir up the powers against heretics, against schismatics, against the scatterers of the Church, against those who blow upon Christ in contempt, against the blasphemers of Baptism, let them not wonder; for God stirs them up, that Hagar may be beaten by Sarah. Let Hagar know herself, let her lower her neck: for when, humbled, she was departing from her mistress, an angel met her and said, What is it, Hagar, maidservant
Editors' notes and page, col. 1482

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1482

In tribus Mss, lusus est seducens. In uno, seductor.

In three manuscripts: lusus est seducens ("he played, leading astray"). In one: seductor ("a seducer"). [The first word, read here as "lusus", is unclear on the scan.]

(printed under page 89)

Page

  • running head: [...]TATUS XI. CAPUT II. 1482 (cut off at left edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1483
Sarae? cum conquesta esset de domina, quid audivit ab Angelo? Revertere ad dominam tuam (Gen. XVI, 5-9). Ad hoc ergo affligitur, ut revertatur. Atque utinam revertatur; quia proles ejus, sicut filii Jacob, cum fratribus haereditatem tenebit.
of Sarah? When she had complained about her mistress, what did she hear from the angel? Return to your mistress (Gen. 16:5–9). For this, then, she is afflicted, that she may return. And would that she would return; for her offspring, like the sons of Jacob, will hold the inheritance with the brothers.
14. Mirantur autem quia commoventur potestates christianae adversus detestandos dissipatores Ecclesiae. Non ergo moverentur? Et quomodo redderent rationem de imperio suo Deo? Intendat Charitas vestra quid dicam, quia pertinet hoc ad reges saeculi christianos, ut temporibus suis pacatam velint matrem suam Ecclesiam, unde spiritualiter nati sunt. Legimus Danielis visiones et gesta prophetica. Tres pueri in igne laudaverunt Dominum: miratus est Nabuchodonosor rex laudantes Deum pueros, et circa eos ignem innocentem; et cum admiratus esset, quid ait Nabuchodonosor rex, non vel Judaeus vel circumcisus, ille qui statuam suam erexerat, et ad eam adorandam omnes coegerat; tamen laudibus trium puerorum commotus, ubi vidit majestatem Dei praesentis in igne, quid ait? « Et ego proponam decretum omnibus tribubus et linguis in omni terra. » Quale decretum? « Quicumque dixerint blasphemiam in Deum Sidrac, Misac, et Abdenago, in interitum erunt, et domus eorum in perditionem » (Dan. III). Ecce quomodo saevit rex alienigena, ne blasphemetur Deus Israel, quia potuit tres pueros de igne liberare: et nolunt ut saeviant reges christiani, quia Christus exsufflatur, a quo non tres pueri, sed orbis terrarum cum ipsis regibus a gehennarum igne liberatur? Nam tres illi pueri, fratres mei, liberati sunt ab igne temporali. Numquid non ipse est Deus Machabaeorum, qui et trium puerorum? Illos ab igne liberavit: illi in tormentis igneis corpore defecerunt, sed in legitimis mandatis animo permanserunt. Illi aperte liberati sunt, illi occulte coronati sunt (II Machab. VII). Plus est liberari de flamma gehennarum, quam de fornace potestatis humanae. Si ergo Nabuchodonosor rex laudavit et praedicavit et gloriam dedit Deo, quia liberavit de igne tres pueros, et tantam gloriam dedit, ut decretum mitteret per regnum suum, Quicumque dixerint blasphemiam in Deum Sidrac, Misac, et Abdenago, in interitum erunt, et domus eorum in perditionem: quomodo isti reges non moveantur, qui non tres pueros attendunt liberatos de flamma, sed seipsos liberatos de gehenna, quando vident Christum, a quo liberati sunt, exsufflari in Christianis, quando audiunt dici christiano, Dic te non esse christianum? Talia facere volunt, et saltem talia pati nolunt.
14. But they are amazed that the Christian authorities are stirred against the detestable scatterers of the Church. Should they not, then, be stirred? And how would they render account to God for their rule? Let Your Charity attend to what I say: that it belongs to the Christian kings of this world to want their mother the Church, from whom they were spiritually born, to be at peace in their times. We read the visions of Daniel and his prophetic deeds. Three boys praised the Lord in the fire: King Nebuchadnezzar marvelled at the boys praising God, and at the fire harmless around them; and when he had marvelled, what did King Nebuchadnezzar say, he who was neither a Jew nor circumcised, he who had set up his own statue and had compelled all to worship it? Yet, moved by the praises of the three boys, when he saw the majesty of God present in the fire, what did he say? "And I will set forth a decree to all tribes and tongues in all the earth." What sort of decree? "Whoever shall speak blasphemy against the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego shall go to destruction, and their houses to perdition" (Dan. 3). See how a foreign king rages, lest the God of Israel be blasphemed, because He was able to deliver three boys from the fire: and are they unwilling that Christian kings should rage, when Christ is blown upon, He by Whom not three boys, but the whole world together with the kings themselves, is delivered from the fire of hell? For those three boys, my brothers, were delivered from a temporal fire. Is He not the very God of the Maccabees, Who is also the God of the three boys? These He delivered from the fire: those failed in body in fiery torments, but persevered in spirit in the commandments of the law. These were openly delivered, those were secretly crowned (2 Macc. 7). It is a greater thing to be delivered from the flame of hell than from the furnace of human power. If, then, King Nebuchadnezzar praised and proclaimed and gave glory to God, because He delivered three boys from the fire, and gave such great glory that he sent a decree through his kingdom, Whoever shall speak blasphemy against the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego shall go to destruction, and their houses to perdition: how should these kings not be stirred, who consider not three boys delivered from the flame, but themselves delivered from hell, when they see Christ, by Whom they were delivered, blown upon in Christians, when they hear it said to a Christian, Say that you are not a Christian? Such things they want to do, and yet they are unwilling at least to suffer such things.
15. Nam videte qualia faciunt, et qualia patiuntur. Occidunt animas, affliguntur in corpore: sempiternas mortes faciunt, et temporales se perpeti conqueruntur. Et tamen quas patiuntur? Proferunt nobis nescio quos in persecutione suos martyres. Ecce Marculus de petra praecipitatus est: ecce Donatus Bagaiensis in puteum missus est. Quando potestates Romanae talia supplicia decreverunt, ut praecipitarentur homines? Quid autem respondent nostri? Quid
15. For see what sort of things they do, and what sort of things they suffer. They kill souls, they are afflicted in the body: they cause everlasting deaths, and they complain that they endure temporal ones. And yet what deaths do they suffer? They bring forward to us some martyrs or other of theirs in persecution. See, Marculus was thrown down from a rock: see, Donatus of Bagai was cast into a well. When did the Roman authorities decree such punishments, that men should be thrown down headlong? But what do our people answer? What
Editors' notes and page, col. 1483

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1483

Editi, non nocentem. Mss., innocentem.

The printed editions have non nocentem ("not harmful"). The manuscripts have innocentem ("innocent").

(printed under page 90)

Page

  • running head: 1483 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)