Jesus non se credebat eis; Sed non diceret Evangelista, Multi crediderunt in nomine ejus, nisi verum illis testimonium perhiberet. Magna ergo res, et mira res: credunt homines in Christum, et Christus non se credit hominibus. Praesertim quia Filius Dei est, utique volens passus est; et si nollet, nunquam pateretur; qui si nollet, nec nasceretur: si autem hoc solum vellet, ut nasceretur tantum, et non moreretur, et quidquid vellet, faceret; quia omnipotentis Patris Filius omnipotens est. Ex ipsis rebus probemus. Quia cum voluissent eum tenere, discessit ab eis; loquitur Evangelium: Et cum voluissent eum de vertice montis praecipitare, discessit ab eis illaesus (Luc. IV, 29, 30). Et quando venerunt ad eum comprehendendum, jam venditum a Juda traditore, cum ille putaret in potestate se habere, tradere magistrum et Dominum suum; et ibi ostendit Dominus voluntate se pati, non necessitate. Nam cum eum comprehendere Judaei voluissent, dixit illis: Quem quaeritis? At illi dixerunt: Jesum Nazarenum. Et ille: Ego sum. Hac voce audita, redierunt retro, et ceciderunt (Joan. XVIII, 4-6). In eo quod eos respondens dejecit, ostendit potestatem; ut in eo quod ab eis comprehensus est, ostenderet voluntatem. Ergo quod passus est, misericordiae fuit. Traditus est enim propter delicta nostra, et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram (Rom. IV, 25). Audi verba ipsius: Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam: nemo tollit eam a me, sed ego pono illam a meipso, ut iterum sumam eam (Joan. X, 18). Cum ergo haberet tantam potestatem, cum eam dictis praedicaret, factis ostenderet; quid sibi vult quod non se credebat eis Jesus, quasi aliquid nolenti nocituris, aut aliquid nolenti facturis, praesertim quia jam crediderant in nomine ejus? Et de ipsis dicit Evangelista, Crediderunt in nomine ejus, de quibus dicit, Ipse autem Jesus non credebat semetipsum eis. Quare? Quod ipse nosset omnes, et quia opus ei non erat ut quis testimonium perhiberet de homine; ipse enim sciebat quid esset in homine. Plus noverat artifex quid esset in opere suo, quam ipsum opus quid esset in semetipso. Creator hominis noverat quid esset in homine, quod ipse creatus homo non noverat. Nonne hoc probamus de Petro, quia non noverat quid in ipso esset, quando dixit, Tecum usque ad mortem? Audi quia Dominus noverat quid esset in homine: Tu mecum usque ad mortem? Amen, amen dico tibi, priusquam gallus cantet, ter me negabis (Matth. XXVI, 33, 34, et Luc. XXII, 33, 34). Homo ergo nesciebat quid esset in se; sed Creator hominis noverat quid esset in homine. Crediderunt tamen in nomine ejus multi, et ipse Jesus non se credebat eis. Quid dicimus, fratres? Forte consequentia indicabunt nobis quid sibi vult mysterium verborum istorum. Quia crediderant in eum homines, manifestum est, verum est: nemo dubitat, Evangelium loquitur, verax Evangelista testatur. Item quia ipse Jesus non credebat semetipsum illis, et hoc manifestum est, et nullus christianus dubitat: quia et hoc Evangelium loquitur, et idem verax Evangelista testatur. Quare ergo crediderunt illi in
Jesus did not entrust Himself to them; But the Evangelist would not say, Many believed in His name, unless he were bearing true testimony to them. A great thing, then, and a wondrous thing: men believe in Christ, and Christ does not entrust Himself to men. Especially since He is the Son of God, He certainly suffered willingly; and if He had not willed it, He would never have suffered; for if He had not willed it, He would not even have been born: but if He had willed only this, that He should merely be born and not die, [it would have been so]; and whatever He willed, He would have done; for the Son of the almighty Father is almighty. Let us prove it from the facts themselves. For when they wanted to seize Him, He departed from them; the Gospel says: And when they wanted to throw Him down from the brow of the mountain, He departed from them unharmed (Luke 4:29–30). And when they came to arrest Him, already sold by Judas the traitor, when that man supposed he had it in his power to hand over his master and Lord; there too the Lord showed that He suffered by will, not by necessity. For when the Jews wanted to arrest Him, He said to them: Whom do you seek? And they said: Jesus of Nazareth. And He: I am He. When this word was heard, they went backwards and fell (John 18:4–6). In that He threw them down by answering, He showed His power; so that in that He was arrested by them, He might show His will. Therefore that He suffered was of mercy. For He was delivered up for our offences, and rose again for our justification (Rom. 4:25). Hear His own words: I have power to lay down My life, and I have power to take it up again: no one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself, that I may take it up again (John 10:18). Since, then, He had such great power, since He proclaimed it in words and showed it in deeds, what does it mean that Jesus did not entrust Himself to them, as though they would do Him some harm against His will, or would do something to Him against His will, especially since they had already believed in His name? And of these very people the Evangelist says, They believed in His name, and of them he says, But Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them. Why? Because He knew all men, and because He had no need that anyone should bear testimony about man; for He Himself knew what was in man. The craftsman knew better what was in his work than the work itself knew what was in itself. The Creator of man knew what was in man, which the created man himself did not know. Do we not prove this from Peter, that he did not know what was in himself when he said, With Thee even unto death? Hear that the Lord knew what was in man: You with Me even unto death? Amen, amen I say to you, before the cock crows, you will deny Me three times (Matt. 26:33–34, and Luke 22:33–34). Man, then, did not know what was in himself; but the Creator of man knew what was in man. Yet many believed in His name, and Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them. What do we say, brethren? Perhaps what follows will show us what the mystery of these words means. That men had believed in Him is manifest, it is true: no one doubts it, the Gospel says it, the truthful Evangelist testifies to it. Likewise that Jesus Himself did not entrust Himself to them, this too is manifest, and no Christian doubts it: for this too the Gospel says, and the same truthful Evangelist testifies to it. Why then did those men believe in