Nonne ambulant, operantur, vident, audiunt, loquuntur et stulti, et impii, et injusti? Cum vero se erigit ad aliquid quod ipsa non est, et quod supra ipsam est, et a quo ipsa est, percipit sapientiam, justitiam, pietatem: sine quibus cum esset, mortua erat, nec vitam habebat qua ipsa viveret, sed qua corpus vivificaret. Aliud est enim in anima unde corpus vivificatur, aliud unde ipsa vivificatur. Melius quippe est quam corpus; sed melius quam ipse est Deus. Est ergo ipsa, etiamsi sit insipiens, injusta, impia, vita corporis. Quia vero vita ejus est Deus, quomodo cum ipsa est in corpore, praestat illi vigorem, decorem, mobilitatem, officia membrorum; sic cum vita ejus Deus in ipsa est, praestat illi sapientiam, pietatem, justitiam, charitatem. Aliud est ergo quod praestatur corpori de anima; aliud quod praestatur animae de Deo: vivificat, et vivificatur; mortua vivificat, si ipsa non vivificatur. Veniente itaque verbo et infuso audientibus, factisque illis non solum audientibus, sed etiam obedientibus, resurgit anima a morte sua ad vitam suam; hoc est, ab iniquitate, ab insipientia, ab impietate ad Deum suum, qui est illi sapientia, justitia, claritas. Surgat ad illum, illuminetur ab illo. Accedite, inquit, ad eum. Et quid nobis erit? Et illuminamini (Psal. XXXIII, 5). Si ergo accedendo illuminamini, et recedendo tenebramini; non erat in vobis lumen vestrum, sed in Deo vestro. Accedite, ut resurgatis: si recesseritis, moriemini. Si ergo accedendo vivitis, recedendo morimini; non erat in vobis vita vestra. Ipsa est enim vita vestra, quae est lux vestra. Quoniam apud te est fons vitae, et in lumine tao videbimus lumen (Psal. XXXV, 10).
Do not the foolish too, and the ungodly, and the unjust, walk, work, see, hear, speak? But when it raises itself up to something which it itself is not, and which is above it, and from which it itself is, it receives wisdom, justice, godliness: and while it was without these, it was dead, and did not have a life by which it itself might live, but only one by which it might give life to the body. For that in the soul from which the body is given life is one thing, and that from which the soul itself is given life is another. For it is better than the body; but better than it is God. So the soul, even if it is foolish, unjust, ungodly, is the life of the body. But since its life is God, just as, when it is in the body, it furnishes it with vigour, comeliness, mobility, the functions of the limbs, so, when God its life is in it, He furnishes it with wisdom, godliness, justice, charity. So that which is furnished to the body from the soul is one thing; that which is furnished to the soul from God is another: it gives life, and is given life; dead, it gives life, if it is not itself given life. Therefore, when the word comes and is poured into those who hear, and they are made not only hearers but also obeyers, the soul rises again from its death to its life; that is, from iniquity, from folly, from ungodliness to its God, Who is to it wisdom, justice, brightness. Let it rise to Him, let it be enlightened by Him. Approach, he says, to Him. And what will there be for us? And be enlightened (Ps. 33:5). If, then, by approaching you are enlightened, and by withdrawing you are darkened, your light was not in you, but in your God. Approach, that you may rise again: if you withdraw, you will die. If, then, by approaching you live, by withdrawing you die, your life was not in you. For that same is your life which is your light. For with Thee is the fountain of life, and in Thy light we shall see light (Ps. 35:10).
13. Non ergo sicut anima aliquid aliud est antequam illuminetur, et fit melius cum illuminatur participatione melioris; ita et Verbum Dei, Filius Dei, aliquid aliud erat antequam acciperet vitam, ut participando habeat vitam: sed vitam habet in semetipso; ac per hoc ipse est ipsa vita. Quid ergo ait, Dedit Filio vitam habere in semetipso? Breviter dixerim, Genuit Filium. Neque enim erat sine vita, et accepit vitam; sed nascendo vita est. Pater vita est non nascendo; Filius vita est nascendo. Pater de nullo patre, Filius de Deo Patre. Pater quod est, a nullo est: quod autem Pater est, propter Filium est. Filius vero et quod Filius est, propter Patrem est; et quod est, a Patre est. Hoc ergo dixit, Vitam dedit Filio, ut haberet eam in semetipso; tanquam diceret, Pater qui est vita in semetipso, genuit Filium qui esset vita in semetipso. Pro eo enim quod est genuit, voluit intelligi dedit. Tanquam si cuiquam diceremus, Dedit tibi Deus esse. Cui dedit? Si alicui jam existenti dedit esse, non ei dedit esse; quia erat, antequam ei daretur, qui posset accipere. Cum ergo audis, Dedit tibi esse, non eras qui acciperes, et existendo accepisti ut esses. Dedit structor domui huic ut esset. Sed quid ei dedit? Ut domus esset. Cui dedit? Huic domui. Quid ei dedit? Ut domus esset. Quomodo potuit dare domui ut domus esset? Etenim si domus erat; cui daret, ut domus esset, quando jam domus erat? Quid est
13. So it is not the case that, just as the soul is something else before it is enlightened, and becomes better when it is enlightened by participation in what is better, so too the Word of God, the Son of God, was something else before He received life, so that He might have life by participating: rather, He has life in Himself; and for this reason He Himself is Life itself. What, then, does He mean by, He gave to the Son to have life in Himself? I would say briefly: He begot the Son. For He was not without life and then received life; but by being born He is Life. The Father is Life by not being born; the Son is Life by being born. The Father is from no father, the Son from God the Father. That which the Father is, He is from no one: but that He is Father, He is on account of the Son. But the Son, both that He is Son, He is on account of the Father; and that which He is, He is from the Father. This, then, is what He said, He gave life to the Son, that He might have it in Himself; as if He were saying, The Father, Who is Life in Himself, begot the Son, Who should be Life in Himself. For in place of begot He wished gave to be understood. As if we were to say to someone, God gave you to be. To whom did He give it? If He gave being to someone already existing, He did not give him being; for there was, before it was given him, someone who could receive it. So when you hear, He gave you to be, you were not someone who might receive it, and by existing you received it, that you might be. A builder gave to this house that it should be. But what did he give it? That it should be a house. To whom did he give it? To this house. What did he give it? That it should be a house. How could he give to a house that it should be a house? For if it was a house, to what would he give that it should be a house, when it was already a house? What is