Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1543–1556

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XIII-XIX

Tractate XIX

PL 35:1543
mordacia, praecepta justitiae. Est quod videas, sed non est unde videas. Non mihi antea credebas quia est quod videas: duce quadam ratione adductus es: propinquasti, intendisti, palpitasti, refugisti. Scis certe esse quod videas, sed idoneum non te esse qui videas. Ergo curare. Quae sunt collyria? Noli mentiri, noli perjurare, noli adulterare, noli furari, noli fraudare. Sed consuesti, et cum aliquo dolore a consuetudine revocaris: hoc est quod mordet, sed sanat. Nam dico tibi liberius, ex timore et meo et tuo: si curari destiteris, et esse idoneus ad perfruendum hac luce neglexeris, valetudine oculorum tuorum; tenebras amabis; et amando tenebras, in tenebris remanebis; et remanendo in tenebris, etiam in tenebras exteriores projicieris: ibi erit fletus et stridor dentium (Matth. XXII, 13). Si nihil in te faciebat amor lucis, f⟨a⟩ciat timor doloris.
biting, the precepts of justice. There is something for you to see, but there is not that with which you may see. Before, you did not believe me that there is something for you to see; you were led on with a certain reasoning as your guide: you drew near, you strained your gaze, you trembled, you shrank back. You know for certain that there is something for you to see, but that you are not fit to see it. Therefore be healed. What are the eye-salves? Do not lie, do not perjure yourself, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not defraud. But you have grown used to these things, and you are called back from habit with some pain: this is what stings, but heals. For I tell you rather freely, out of fear both mine and yours: if you cease to be healed, and neglect to become fit to enjoy this light by the health of your eyes, you will love darkness; and by loving darkness you will remain in darkness; and by remaining in darkness you will be cast even into the outer darkness: there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matt. 22:13). If the love of the light did nothing in you, let the fear of pain do something.
12. Sufficienter me locutum arbitror, et lectionem tamen evangelicam non finivi: si dicam reliqua onerabo vos, et timeo ne etiam quod haustum est effundatur; sufficiant ergo ista Charitati vestrae. Debitores sumus, non nunc, sed semper quamdiu vivimus; quia propter vos vivimus. Verumtamen vitam nostram istam infirmam, laboriosam, periculosam, in hoc mundo cons⟨o⟩lamini bene vivendo, nolite nos contristare et atterere malis moribus vestris. Cum enim offendimur mala vita vestra, si refugiamus a vobis, et separemus nos a vobis, et ad vos non accedamus; nonne conqueremini, et dicetis: Et si languebamus, curaretis; et si infirmabamur, visitaretis? Ecce curamus, ecce visitamus sed non nobis fiat quomodo audistis ab Apostolo, Timeo ne sine causa laboraverim in vos (Galat. IV, 11).
12. I think I have spoken sufficiently, and yet I have not finished the Gospel reading: if I say the rest I shall burden you, and I fear lest even what has been drawn in be poured out; so let these things suffice for your Charity. We are debtors, not now only, but always as long as we live; for we live for your sake. Yet console this life of ours, weak, toilsome, perilous, in this world by living well; do not sadden and wear us down by your bad conduct. For when we are offended by your bad life, if we should withdraw from you, and separate ourselves from you, and not come near you, would you not complain, and say: And if we were sick, you should have healed us; and if we were infirm, you should have visited us? Behold, we heal; behold, we visit; but let it not befall us as you have heard from the Apostle: I fear lest I have laboured among you without cause (Gal. 4:11).
TRACTATUS XIX. Ab eo quod scriptum est, Non potest a se Filius facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem; usque ad id, quia non quaero voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Cap. V, ℣. 19-30.
Tractate 19. From that which is written, The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing; as far as this, because I do not seek My own will, but the will of Him Who sent Me. Chapter 5, verses 19-30.
1. Sermone pristino, quantum nostrum movit affectum et intelligendi paupertatem, locuti sumus, ex occasione verborum evangelicorum, ubi scriptum est, Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem, quid sit videre Filii, hoc est, videre Verbi, quia Filius Verbum: et quia per Verbum facta sunt omnia, quomodo possit intelligi quod videat Filius primo Patrem facientem, tunc demum et ipse faciat quae facta conspexerit; cum Pater nihil nisi per Filium fecerit. Omnia enim per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil. Non tamen explicatum aliquid diximus; sed quia nec explicatum aliquid intelleximus. Aliquando quippe sermo deficit, ubi etiam intellectus proficit; quanto magis sermo patitur defectionem, quando intellectus non habet perfectionem? Nunc itaque, quantum Dominus donat, breviter percurramus lectionem, et vel hodie expleamus debitum pensum. Si quid forte remanserit vel temporis vel virium, retractabimus, si potuerimus (quantum et a nobis et apud vos fieri potest), quid sit videre Verbi, quid demonstrari
1. In the former sermon we spoke, as far as it moved our affection and our poverty of understanding, taking occasion from the words of the Gospel where it is written, The Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing, about what the seeing of the Son is, that is, the seeing of the Word, since the Son is the Word: and, since all things were made through the Word, how it can be understood that the Son first sees the Father doing, and only then Himself does what He has beheld done; when the Father has done nothing except through the Son. For all things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made. Yet we said nothing unfolded; but that is because we understood nothing unfolded either. For sometimes speech fails even where understanding makes progress; how much more does speech suffer failure when understanding does not have perfection? Now therefore, as far as the Lord grants, let us run briefly through the reading, and at least today discharge the task we owe. If perhaps anything remains either of time or of strength, we shall take up again, if we can (as far as it can be done both by us and among you), what the seeing of the Word is, what it is to be shown
Editors' notes and page, col. 1543

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: laboraverim in vos› · call in col 1543

Lov., in vobis. Editi alii et Mss., in vos ; juxta graecum.

Louvain: "among you". The other editions and the manuscripts: "for you", following the Greek.

(printed under page 120)

Page

  • running head: 1543 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, [cut off at the image edge]
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1544
Verbo. Omnia quippe dicta sunt hic, quae si intelligantur secundum humanum sensum carnaliter, nihil aliud nobis facit anima plena phantasmatis, nisi quasdam imagines velut duorum hominum Patris et Filii, unius ostendentis; alterius videntis; unius loquentis, alterius audientis: quae omnia idola cordis sunt; quae si jam dejecta sunt de templis suis, quanto magis dejicienda sunt de pectoribus christianis?
to the Word. For indeed all the things said here are such that, if they are understood carnally according to human sense, a soul full of phantasms makes for us nothing else but certain images, as it were of two men, the Father and the Son, one showing, the other seeing; one speaking, the other hearing: all of which are idols of the heart; and if these have already been cast down from their temples, how much more must they be cast down from Christian breasts?
2. Non potest, inquit, Filius a se facere quidquam nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem. Verum est hoc, tenete hoc: dum tamen non amittatis quod in ipsius Evangelii exordio tenuistis, quia in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum; et praecipue quia omnia per ipsum facta sunt (Joan. I, 1, 3). Quod nunc enim audistis, conjungite illi auditui, et utrumque concordet in cordibus vestris. Sic itaque non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem, ut tamen Pater ea quae facit non faciat nisi per Filium, quia Filius est ejus Verbum: et « in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum, » et « omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Quaecumque enim ille fecerit, haec et Filius similiter facit: » non alia, sed haec; nec dissimiliter, sed similiter.
2. The Son, He says, cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing. This is true, hold this fast: provided only that you do not let go of what you held at the very opening of the Gospel, that in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; and above all that all things were made through Him (John 1:1, 3). For what you have now heard, join to that hearing, and let both agree in your hearts. So then the Son cannot do anything of Himself, except what He has seen the Father doing, in such a way that the Father nevertheless does not do the things He does except through the Son, because the Son is His Word: and "in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God," and "all things were made through Him. For whatever things He has done, these the Son also does in like manner:" not other things, but these; nor in unlike manner, but in like manner.
3. Pater enim diligit Filium, et omnia demonstrat ei quae ipse facit. Ad hoc quod supra dixit, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem, videtur pertinere et quod omnia demonstrat ei quae ipse facit. Sed si Pater demonstrat quae facit, nec Filius potest facere nisi Pater demonstraverit, Paterque demonstrare non potest nisi fecerit; consequens erit ut non per Filium faciat omnia Pater: porro si fixum atque inconcussum tenemus quia per Filium omnia Pater facit, antequam faciat, demonstrat Filio. Nam si Pater cum fecerit demonstrat Filio, ut Filius demonstrata faciat quae demonstrata jam facta sunt; aliquid procul dubio Pater sine Filio facit. Sed non facit Pater aliquid sine Filio, quia Filius Dei Verbum Dei est, et omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Remanet igitur fortasse ut quae Pater facturus est, demonstret facienda, ut per Filium sint facta. Nam si Filius ea facit quae Pater facta demonstrat; ea quae Pater facta demonstrat, non utique per Filium fecit. Monstrari enim non possent Filio nisi facta; facere Filius non posset, nisi monstrata: ergo sine Filio facta. Sed verum est, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt: ergo antequam facta, monstrata sunt. Sed hoc diximus differendum esse, quo redeundum sit percursa lectione, si, ut diximus, aliquid vel temporis vel virium nobis remanserit, ad ea quae distulimus retractanda.
3. For the Father loves the Son, and shows Him all things that He Himself does. To what He said above, except what He has seen the Father doing, there seems to belong also this, that He shows Him all things that He Himself does. But if the Father shows what He does, and the Son cannot do anything unless the Father has shown it, and the Father cannot show unless He has done it, it will follow that the Father does not do all things through the Son: but if we hold it fixed and unshaken that the Father does all things through the Son, then before He does them He shows them to the Son. For if the Father shows them to the Son when He has done them, so that the Son does the things shown, which, being shown, have already been done, then beyond doubt the Father does something without the Son. But the Father does nothing without the Son, because the Son of God is the Word of God, and all things were made through Him. It remains, therefore, perhaps, that the things the Father is about to do He shows as things to be done, so that they may be made through the Son. For if the Son does those things which the Father shows as done, then those things which the Father shows as done He certainly did not do through the Son. For they could not be shown to the Son unless done; the Son could not do them unless shown: therefore they were done without the Son. But it is true, All things were made through Him: therefore before they were done, they were shown. But this, we said, must be deferred, so that we may return to it when the reading has been gone through, if, as we said, any time or strength remains to us for going back over the things we have put off.
4. Amplius audite et difficilius: Et majora his, inquit, demonstrabit ei opera, ut vos miremini. Majora his: quibus majora? Facile occurrit, iis quas modo audistis, curationibus languorum corporalium. De isto enim qui triginta et octo annos habebat in infirmitate, et Christi verbo sanatus est, nata est hujus occasio tota sermonis: et propter hoc Dominus dicere potuit: Majora his demonstrabit ei opera, ut vos miremini. Sunt enim opera majora quam ista, et demonstrabit ea Pater Filio. Non demonstravit, tanquam de praeterito;
4. Hear something further and more difficult: And greater works than these, He says, will He show Him, so that you may marvel. Greater than these: greater than which? It readily comes to mind: than those you have just heard of, the healings of bodily infirmities. For from that man who had been thirty-eight years in his infirmity and was healed by the word of Christ, the whole occasion of this discourse arose: and on this account the Lord could say: Greater works than these will He show Him, so that you may marvel. For there are works greater than these, and the Father will show them to the Son. Not "He has shown," as of the past;
Editors' notes and page, col. 1544

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1544 (cut off at the left edge of the image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the cut-off left column (end of col. 1543) not set; "sed haec" in §2: the ae ligature is damaged but legible; "De isto" in §4: the s is blurred; "Digitized by Google" stamp not set; no full-width lines; no editors' matter
PL 35:1545
sed demonstrabit, d⟨e⟩ futuro, hoc est, demonstraturus est. Rursus difficilis oritur quaestio. Est enim aliquid apud Patrem quod Filio nondum demonstratum sit? est aliquid apud Patrem quod adhuc latebat Filium, quando ista Filius loquebatur? Si enim demonstrabit, hoc est, demonstraturus est; nondum demonstravit; et Filio tunc demonstraturus est, quando et istis: sequitur enim, ut vos miremini. Et hoc difficile est videre, quomodo tanquam temporaliter Filio coaeterno aliqua demonstrat aeternus Pater, omnia scienti quae sunt apud Patrem.
but "He will show", of the future, that is, He is going to show. Again a difficult question arises. For is there something with the Father which has not yet been shown to the Son? Is there something with the Father which was still hidden from the Son, when the Son was saying these things? For if "He will show", that is, He is going to show, He has not yet shown; and He is going to show it to the Son at the same time as to these men too, for there follows: "that you may marvel". And this too is difficult to see: how the eternal Father shows, as it were in time, certain things to the coeternal Son, who knows all things that are with the Father.
5. Quae sunt tamen illa majora? Hoc enim forte f⟨a⟩cile est intelligere. Sicut enim Pater, inquit, suscitat mortuos, et vivificat; sic et Filius quos vult vivificat. Majora ergo sunt opera mortuos suscitare, quam languidos sanare. Sed sicut suscitat Pater mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vivificat. Alios ergo Pater, alios Filius? Sed omnia per ipsum: ipsos itaque Filius, quos et Pater; quia non alia, nec aliter, sed haec et Filius similiter facit. Ita plane intelligendum est, et ita tenendum: sed mementote quia Filius quos vult vivificat. Tenete hic ergo non solum potestatem Filii, verum etiam voluntatem. Et Filius quos vult vivificat, et Pater quos vult vivificat; et ipsos Filius quos et Pater: ac per hoc eadem Patris et Filii et potestas est et voluntas. Quid est ergo quod sequitur? Neque enim Pater judicat quemquam, sed judicium omne dedit Filio, ut omnes honorificent Filium, sicut honorificant Patrem: quod ita subjunxit, tanquam rationem reddens superioris sententiae. Multum movet, intenti estote. Filius quos vult vivificat, Pater quos vult vivificat: Filius suscitat mortuos, sicut Pater suscitat mortuos. Neque enim Pater judic⟨a⟩t quemquam. Si in judicio suscitandi sunt mortui, quomodo Pater suscitat mortuos, si non judicat quemquam? Omne quippe judicium dedit Filio. In illo autem judicio suscitantur mortui; et resurgunt alii ad vitam, alii ad poenam: quod totum si Filius facit, Pater autem ideo non facit, quia Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio, contrarium videbitur ei quod dictum est, Sicut Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vivificat. Simul ergo suscitant. Si simul suscitant, simul vivificant. Simul ergo judicant: quomodo itaque verum est, Neque enim Pater judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio? Moveant interim propositae quaestiones, praestabit Dominus ut solutae delectent. Ita est, fratres; omnis quaestio nisi intentum fecerit proposita, non delectabit exposita. Sequatur ergo ipse Dominus, ne forte in iis quae subnectit, aperiat se aliquantum. Subtexit enim nubilo lucem suam; et difficile est aquilae more volare super omnem nebulam qua tegitur omnis terra (Eccli. XXIV, 6), et videre in verbis Domini sincerissimam lucem. Ne forte ergo calore radiorum suorum discutiat caliginem nostram, et aliquantum se in consequentibus aperire dignetur, dilatis istis sequentia videamus.
5. What, however, are those greater things? For this is perhaps easy to understand. "For as the Father," He says, "raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom He will." Greater works, then, are raising the dead than healing the sick. But "as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom He will." Does the Father, then, give life to some, the Son to others? But all things are through Him; and so the Son gives life to the very same whom the Father does too, since it is not other things, nor in another way, but "these things the Son also does likewise." So it must plainly be understood, and so it must be held; but remember that "the Son gives life to whom He will." Hold fast here, then, not only the power of the Son but also His will. Both the Son gives life to whom He will, and the Father gives life to whom He will; and the Son gives life to the very same as the Father does: and hence the power and the will of the Father and of the Son are one and the same. What is it, then, that follows? "For neither does the Father judge anyone, but He has given all judgement to the Son, that all may honour the Son as they honour the Father": which He added thus, as though giving the reason for the preceding statement. This greatly perplexes; be attentive. The Son gives life to whom He will, the Father gives life to whom He will; the Son raises the dead, as the Father raises the dead. "For neither does the Father judge anyone." If the dead are to be raised in the judgement, how does the Father raise the dead, if He judges no one? "For He has given all judgement to the Son." But in that judgement the dead are raised; and some rise again to life, others to punishment: if the Son does all this, but the Father does not do it, because "the Father judges no one, but has given all judgement to the Son," this will seem contrary to what was said: "As the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom He will." They raise together, then. If they raise together, they give life together. They judge together, then: how then is it true, "For neither does the Father judge anyone, but He has given all judgement to the Son"? Let the questions set before you stir you meanwhile; the Lord will grant that, once solved, they may delight you. So it is, brethren: every question, unless when set forth it has made the hearer attentive, will not delight when explained. Let the Lord Himself, then, follow on, in case perhaps in what He adds He may open Himself somewhat. For He has woven His light beneath a cloud; and it is difficult, after the manner of an eagle, to fly above every mist by which all the earth is covered (Sir. 24:6), and to see in the words of the Lord the purest light. In case, then, He may perhaps dispel our darkness with the heat of His rays, and deign to open Himself somewhat in what follows, let us put these things aside and look at what follows.
6. Qui non honorificat Filium, non honorificat Patrem qui misit illum. Hoc verum est et planum est. Omne quippe judicium dedit Filio, sicut supra dixit, ut omnes
6. "He who does not honour the Son does not honour the Father who sent Him." This is true and it is plain. "For He has given all judgement to the Son," as He said above, "that all
Editors' notes and page, col. 1545

Page

  • running head: 1545 TRACTATUS XVIII. CAP (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "dc futuro" in line 1 set d⟨e⟩ as damaged type; "f.icile" set f⟨a⟩cile as damaged type; "judicxt" set judic⟨a⟩t as damaged type; last word "om-" (omnes) split at the column break; printer's signature "PATROL. XXXV." at the foot not set; right-hand column (1546) visible only in part and not set; no margin letters visible in the images
  • other: the word omnes was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1546
PL 35:1546
honorificent Filium, sicut honorificant Patrem. Quid si inveniuntur qui Patrem honorificant, et non honorificant Filium? Non potest, inquit, fieri: Qui non honorificat Filium, non honorificat Patrem qui misit illum. Non potest ergo dicere aliquis, Ego Patrem honorificabam, quia Filium non noveram. Si nondum Filium honorificabas, nec Patrem honorificabas. Quid est enim honorificare Patrem, nisi quod habeat Filium? Aliud est enim cum tibi commendatur Deus, quia Deus est; et aliud est cum tibi commendatur Deus, quia Pater est. Cum tibi quia Deus est commendatur, creator tibi commendatur, omnipotens tibi commendatur, spiritus quidam summus, aeternus, invisibilis, incommutabilis tibi commendatur: cum vero tibi quia Pater est commendatur, nihil tibi aliud quam et Filius commendatur; quia Pater dici non potest, si Filium non habet; sicut nec Filius, si Patrem non habet. Sed ne forte Patrem quidem honorifices tanquam majorem, Filium vero tanquam minorem, ut dicas mihi, Honorifico Patrem, scio enim quod habeat Filium; et non erro in Patris nomine, non enim Patrem intelligo sine Filio, honorifico tamen et Filium tanquam minorem: corrigit te ipse Filius, et revocat te dicens, ut omnes honorificent Filium, non inferius, sed sicut honorificant Patrem. Qui ergo non honorificat Filium, non honorificat Patrem qui misit illum. Ego, inquis, majorem honorem volo dare Patri, minorem Filio. Ibi tollis honorem Patri, ubi minorem das Filio. Quid enim aliud tibi videtur ita sentienti, nisi quia Pater aequalem sibi Filium generare aut noluit, aut non potuit? Si noluit, invidit; si non potuit, defecit. Non ergo vides quia ita sentiendo, ubi majorem honorem vis dare Patri, ibi es contumeliosus in Patrem? Proinde sic honorifica Filium, quomodo honorificas Patrem, si vis honorificare et Patrem et Filium.
all may honour the Son, as they honour the Father. What if some are found who honour the Father, and do not honour the Son? It cannot be, He says: He who does not honour the Son does not honour the Father Who sent Him. No one, then, can say, I used to honour the Father, because I did not know the Son. If you were not yet honouring the Son, neither were you honouring the Father. For what is it to honour the Father, except [to honour Him] in that He has a Son? For it is one thing when God is commended to you because He is God, and another thing when God is commended to you because He is Father. When He is commended to you because He is God, a creator is commended to you, an almighty one is commended to you, a certain supreme spirit, eternal, invisible, unchangeable, is commended to you: but when He is commended to you because He is Father, nothing else is commended to you than that the Son also is; for He cannot be called Father if He does not have a Son; just as neither [can He be called] Son, if He does not have a Father. But lest perhaps you honour the Father indeed as greater, but the Son as lesser, so as to say to me, I honour the Father, for I know that He has a Son; and I do not err in the name of the Father, for I do not understand the Father without the Son, yet I honour the Son too as lesser: the Son Himself corrects you, and calls you back, saying, that all may honour the Son, not lower, but as they honour the Father. He therefore who does not honour the Son does not honour the Father Who sent Him. I, you say, want to give greater honour to the Father, lesser to the Son. There you take honour away from the Father, where you give lesser to the Son. For what else does it seem to you, thinking thus, except that the Father either would not, or could not, beget a Son equal to Himself? If He would not, He begrudged; if He could not, He failed. Do you not see, then, that by thinking thus, where you wish to give greater honour to the Father, there you are insulting towards the Father? Therefore honour the Son in the same way as you honour the Father, if you wish to honour both the Father and the Son.
7. Amen, amen dico vobis, quia qui verbum meum audit, et credit ei qui misit me, habet vitam aeternam; et in judicium non venit, sed transiit, non nunc transit, sed jam transiit a morte in vitam. Et hoc attendite, Qui verbum meum audit: et non dixit, Credit mihi; sed, credit ei qui me misit. Verbum ergo Filii audiat, ut Patri credat. Quare verbum audit tuum, et credit alteri? Nonne cum verbum alicujus audimus, eidem verbum proferenti credimus, loquenti nobis fidem accommodamus? Quid ergo voluit dicere, Qui verbum meum audit, et credit ei qui misit me; nisi, quia verbum ejus est in me? Et quid est, audit verbum meum, nisi, audit me? Credit autem ei qui misit me: quia cum illi credit, verbo ejus credit: cum autem verbo ejus credit, mihi credit; quia Verbum Patris ego sum. Pax ergo in Scripturis, et omnia disposita, nequaquam rixantia. Tu abjice litem cordis tui, intellige concordiam Scripturarum. Numquid contraria sibi diceret veritas?
7. Amen, amen I say to you, that he who hears My word, and believes Him Who sent Me, has eternal life; and he does not come into judgement, but has passed, not is now passing, but has already passed from death into life. And attend to this, He who hears My word: and He did not say, Believes Me; but, believes Him Who sent Me. Let him then hear the word of the Son, that he may believe the Father. Why does he hear your word, and believe another? Is it not the case that when we hear someone's word, we believe the same one who utters the word, we give our faith to the one speaking to us? What then did He mean to say, He who hears My word, and believes Him Who sent Me; except that His word is in Me? And what is, hears My word, except, hears Me? But believes Him Who sent Me: because when he believes Him, he believes His Word: and when he believes His Word, he believes Me; for I am the Word of the Father. There is peace, then, in the Scriptures, and all things are ordered, in no way quarrelling. Cast away the strife of your heart, understand the concord of the Scriptures. Would the truth say things contrary to itself?
8. Qui verbum meum audit, et credit ei qui misit me, habet vitam aeternam; et in judicium non venit, sed transiit a morte in vitam. Meministis quod superius posueramus, quia sicut Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vult vivificat. Incipit jam aperire
8. He who hears My word, and believes Him Who sent Me, has eternal life; and he does not come into judgement, but has passed from death into life. You remember what we had set down above, that as the Father raises the dead and gives life, so the Son also gives life to whom He will. He now begins to reveal
Editors' notes and page, col. 1546

Page

  • running head: …PUS XVIII. CAPUT V. 1546 (left part cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends mid-word "ape-" (broken across the column break), rendered "re-"; printer's signature "(Quarante-neuf.)" and "Digitized by Google" not set; left column (1545) visible in part, not set; running head cut off at left, given as visible
  • other: the word aperire was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1547
PL 35:1547
se, et loqui de resurrectione mortuorum, et ecce jam resurgunt mortui. Qui enim verbum meum audit, et credit ei qui misit me, habet vitam aeternam, et in judicium non veniet. Proba quia resurrexit. Sed transiit, inquit, a morte in vitam. Qui transiit a morte ad vitam, nullo dubitante utique resurrexit. Non enim transiret de morte ad vitam, nisi primo esset in morte, et non esset in vita: cum autem transierit, erit in vita, et non erit in morte. Mortuus ergo erat, et revixit; perierat, et inventus est (Luc. XV, 32). Fit proinde jam quaedam resurrectio, et transeunt homines a morte quadam ad quamdam vitam: a morte infidelitatis, ad vitam fidei; a morte falsitatis ad vitam veritatis; a morte iniquitatis, ad vitam justitiae. Est ergo et ista quaedam resurrectio mortuorum.
Himself, and to speak of the resurrection of the dead, and behold, the dead are already rising. For he who hears My word, and believes Him Who sent Me, has eternal life, and will not come into judgement. Prove that he has risen. But he has passed, He says, from death into life. He who has passed from death to life has certainly risen, no one doubting it. For he would not pass from death to life unless he were first in death and not in life; but when he has passed, he will be in life and will not be in death. He was dead, then, and has come to life again; he was lost, and has been found (Luke 15:32). So there takes place even now a certain resurrection, and men pass from a certain death to a certain life: from the death of unbelief to the life of faith; from the death of falsehood to the life of truth; from the death of iniquity to the life of righteousness. This too, then, is a certain resurrection of the dead.
9. Aperiat illam plenius, et dilucescat nobis, ut coepit. Amen, amen dico vobis, quia venit hora, et nunc est. Nos exspectabamus in fine resurrectionem mortuorum; nam ita credidimus: imo non exspectabamus, sed plane exspectare debemus; neque enim falsum credimus in fine mortuos resur⟨r⟩ecturos. Cum ergo vellet Dominus Jesus insinuare nobis quamdam resurrectionem mortuorum ante resurrectionem mortuorum; non sicut Lazari (Joan. XI, 43, 44), vel filii illius viduae (Luc. VI, 14, 15), vel filiae archisynagogi (Marc. V, 41, 42), qui resurrexerunt morituri (nam et ipsorum mortuorum quaedam resurrectio facta est ante resurrectionem mortuorum): sed sicut hic dicit, Habet, inquit, vitam aeternam; et in judicium non venit, sed transiit a morte ad vitam. Ad quam vitam? Ad aeternam. Non ergo sicut corpus Lazari: transiit enim et ille a morte sepulcri ad vitam hominum, sed non aeternam, iterum moriturus; resurrecturi autem in fine saeculi mortui, in vitam aeternam transibunt. Cum ergo vellet Dominus noster Jesus Christus, magister coelestis, Verbum Patris et Veritas, demonstrare nobis quamdam resurrectionem mortuorum in aeternam vitam, ante resurrectionem mortuorum in aeternam vitam: Venit hora, inquit. Tu procul dubio imbutus fide resurrectionis carnis, exspectabas horam illam finis saeculi, diem judicii, quam ne in isto loco exspectares, addidit, et nunc est. Quod ergo dicit, Venit hora, non dicit de illa hora novissima, ubi in jussu et in voce archangeli, et in tuba Dei Dominus ipse descendet de coelo, et mortui in Christo resurgent primo: deinde nos viventes qui reliqui sumus, simul rapiemur cum illis in nubibus obviam Christo in aera, et ita semper cum Domino erimus (I Thess. IV, 15 et 16). Veniet illa hora, sed non est nunc. Hora vero ista quae sit, advertite: Venit hora, et nunc est. Quid in ea fit? Quid, nisi resurrectio mortuorum? Et qualis resurrectio? Ut qui resurgunt, in aeternum vivant. Hoc erit et in novissima hora.
9. Let Him open it more fully, and let it grow clear to us, as it has begun to. Amen, amen I say to you, that the hour is coming, and now is. We were awaiting the resurrection of the dead at the end; for so we have believed: or rather, we were not awaiting it, but we plainly ought to await it; for it is not falsely that we believe that the dead will rise at the end. Since, then, the Lord Jesus wished to make known to us a certain resurrection of the dead before the resurrection of the dead; not like that of Lazarus (John 11:43–44), or of the son of that widow (Luke 7:14–15), or of the daughter of the ruler of the synagogue (Mark 5:41–42), who rose again only to die (for of these dead too a certain resurrection took place before the resurrection of the dead): but as He says here, he has, He says, eternal life; and he does not come into judgement, but has passed from death to life. To what life? To eternal life. Not, then, like the body of Lazarus: for he too passed from the death of the tomb to the life of men, but not to eternal life, being destined to die again; but the dead who are to rise at the end of the world will pass into eternal life. Since, then, our Lord Jesus Christ, the heavenly Teacher, the Word of the Father and the Truth, wished to show us a certain resurrection of the dead into eternal life, before the resurrection of the dead into eternal life, He says: The hour is coming. You, imbued beyond doubt with faith in the resurrection of the flesh, were awaiting that hour of the end of the world, the day of judgement; and so that you might not await it in this place, He added, and now is. When, therefore, He says, The hour is coming, He does not speak of that last hour, when at the command and at the voice of the archangel, and at the trumpet of God, the Lord Himself will descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first: then we who are living, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet Christ in the air, and so we shall be with the Lord for ever (1 Thess. 4:15–16). That hour will come, but it is not now. But what this hour is, take note: The hour is coming, and now is. What happens in it? What, but the resurrection of the dead? And what kind of resurrection? That those who rise may live for ever. This will also be so in the last hour.
10. Quid igitur? quomodo intelligimus duas istas resurrectiones? Numquid forte qui nunc resurgunt, tunc non resurgent; ut aliorum fiat nunc resurrectio, aliorum tunc? Non est ita. Nam ista resurrectione, si recte credidimus, resurreximus; et nos ipsi qui jam resurreximus, alteram in fine resurrectionem exspectamus.
10. What then? How do we understand these two resurrections? Is it perhaps that those who rise now will not rise then, so that the resurrection of some takes place now, of others then? It is not so. For in this resurrection, if we have believed rightly, we have risen; and we ourselves who have already risen await another resurrection at the end.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1547

Page

  • running head: IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "rire", the tail of a word broken from column 1546; the word stands whole at the end of col. 1546 and the tail is not set here. The last word "exspe-" is broken across the column break and is set whole here as "exspectamus", with the English whole. In "resur⟨r⟩ecturos" the second r is damaged in the type. The Luke reference is printed "Luc. vi, 14, 15" (a misprint for vii) and set as printed; the English gives Luke 7, where the widow's son actually stands. No editors' matter and no full-width line in this column. The foot note (a) on this page belongs to col. 1548.
  • other: the word exspectamus. was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1548
PL 35:1548
Sed et nunc in aeternam vitam resurreximus, si in fide ipsa perseveranter manemus; et tunc in aeternam vitam resurgemus, quando Angelis coaequabimur (Luc. XX, 36). Ipse ergo distinguat, ipse aperiat quod loqui ausi sumus: quomodo fiat resurrectio ante resurrectionem, non aliorum et aliorum, sed eorumdem; nec talis qualis Lazari, sed in vitam aeternam. Aperiet plane. Audite dilucescentem magistrum, et illabentem cordibus nostris solem nostrum; non quem desiderant oculi carnis, sed cui aestuant aperiri oculi cordis. Ipsum ergo audiamus: Amen, amen dico vobis, quia venit hora, et nunc est, quando mortui, videte exprimi resurrectionem, quando mortui audient vocem Filii Dei, et qui audierint vivent. Quare addidit, Qui audierint vivent? Possent enim audire nisi viverent? Sufficeret ergo, Venit hora, et nunc est, quando mortui audient vocem Filii Dei. Jam nos intelligeremus viventes eos; quando nisi viverent, audire non possent. Non, inquit, quia vivunt audiunt, sed audiendo reviviscunt: audient, et qui audierint vivent. Quid est ergo, audient; nisi, obaudient? Quantum enim pertinet ad auris auditum, non omnes qui audient vivent: multi enim audiunt et non credunt; audiendo et non credendo non obaudiunt: non obaudiendo non vivunt. Itaque hic, qui audient, nihil est aliud quam qui obaudient. Qui ergo obaudierint, vivent: certi sint, securi sint, vivent. Praedicatur Christus Verbum Dei, Filius Dei, per quem facta sunt omnia, certe dispensationis gratia assumpta carne natus ex Virgine, infans in carne, juvenis in carne, patiens in carne, moriens in carne, resurgens in carne, ascendens in carne, promittens resurrectionem carni, promittens resurrectionem menti, menti ante carnem, carni post mentem. Qui audit et obaudit, vivet: qui audit et non obaudit, id est, audit et contemnit, audit et non credit, non vivet. Quare non vivet? Quia non audit. Quid est, non audit? Non obaudit. Ergo qui audierint, vivent.
But even now we have risen to eternal life, if we remain perseveringly in that very faith; and then we shall rise to eternal life, when we shall be made equal to the Angels (Luke 20:36). Let Him therefore distinguish, let Him open up what we have dared to speak of: how there comes to be a resurrection before the resurrection, not of some and of others, but of the same people; and not such as was that of Lazarus, but into eternal life. He will plainly open it up. Hear the Master as He dawns, and our Sun as He glides into our hearts; not the one whom the eyes of the flesh desire, but the one for whom the eyes of the heart burn to be opened. Let us therefore hear Him: Amen, amen I say to you, that the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead, see how the resurrection is expressed, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear shall live. Why did He add, Those who hear shall live? For could they hear unless they were living? It would therefore have sufficed [to say], The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God. We would already understand them to be living, since unless they were living they could not hear. No, He says, it is not because they live that they hear, but by hearing they come to life again: they shall hear, and those who hear shall live. What then is, they shall hear, if not, they shall obey? For as far as the hearing of the ear is concerned, not all who hear shall live: for many hear and do not believe; by hearing and not believing they do not obey: by not obeying they do not live. And so here, those who hear is nothing other than those who obey. Those therefore who obey shall live: let them be certain, let them be secure, they shall live. Christ is preached, the Word of God, the Son of God, through Whom all things were made, certainly, for the sake of the dispensation, having taken on flesh, born of the Virgin, an infant in the flesh, a young man in the flesh, suffering in the flesh, dying in the flesh, rising in the flesh, ascending in the flesh, promising resurrection to the flesh, promising resurrection to the mind, to the mind before the flesh, to the flesh after the mind. He who hears and obeys shall live: he who hears and does not obey, that is, hears and despises, hears and does not believe, shall not live. Why shall he not live? Because he does not hear. What is, he does not hear? He does not obey. Therefore those who hear shall live.
11. Attende nunc quod dixeramus differendum, ut nunc, si fieri potuerit, aperiatur. Subjecit continuo de hac ipsa resurrectione, Sicut enim Pater habet vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio vitam habere in semetipso. Quid est, habet vitam Pater in semetipso? Non alibi habet vitam, sed in semetipso. Vivere quippe suum in illo est; non aliunde, non alienum est: non quasi mutuatur vitam, nec quasi particeps fit vitae, ejus vitae quae non est quod ipse; sed habet vitam in semetipso, ut ipsa vita sibi sit ipse. Si potuero adhuc modicum quid inde dicere, exemplis propositis ad intelligentiam vestram informandam, Domino adjuvante potero, et pietate intentionis vestrae. Vivit Deus, vivit et anima: sed vita Dei immutabilis est, vita animae mutabilis est. Deus nec proficit, nec deficit; sed est ipse semper in se, est ita ut est: non aliter nunc, aliter postea, aliter antea. Animae vero vita, valde aliter atque aliter: vivebat stulta, vivit sapiens; vivebat iniqua, vivit justa: nunc meminit, nunc obliviscitur; nunc discit, nunc discere non potest; nunc perdit quod didicerat, nunc percipit
11. Attend now to what we had said was to be deferred, so that now, if it can be done, it may be opened up. He added at once concerning this very resurrection, For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has given also to the Son to have life in Himself. What is, the Father has life in Himself? He has life not elsewhere, but in Himself. For His living is in Him; it is not from elsewhere, it is not another's: He does not, as it were, borrow life, nor does He, as it were, become a partaker of life, of a life which is not what He Himself is; but He has life in Himself, so that He Himself is His very life. If I am able to say a little more on this, setting forth examples to shape your understanding, I shall be able with the Lord's help, and by the devotion of your attention. God lives, and the soul also lives: but the life of God is unchangeable, the life of the soul is changeable. God neither advances nor declines; but He is always Himself in Himself, He is just as He is: not one way now, another way afterwards, another way before. But the life of the soul is very much now one way and now another: it lived foolish, it lives wise; it lived unjust, it lives just: now it remembers, now it forgets; now it learns, now it cannot learn; now it loses what it had learned, now it grasps
Editors' notes and page, col. 1548

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: omnia, certe› · call in col 1548

Seu certae.

Or "certae" (agreeing with "dispensationis": "of a definite dispensation").

(printed under page 122)

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1548 (cut off at left edge; "AUGUSTINI" printed with damaged type)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1549
quod amiserat : mutabilis vita animae. Et cum vivit anima in iniquitate, mors ejus est : cum autem fit justa, fit particeps alterius vitae, quae non est quod ipsa, erigendo se quippe ad Deum et inhaerendo Deo, ex illo justificatur. Dictum est enim : Credenti in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam (Rom. IV, 5). Deficiendo ab illo fit iniqua, proficiendo ad illum fit justa. Nonne videtur tibi quasi aliquid frigidum igni admotum fervescere, remotum ab igne torpescere? nonne videtur tibi quiddam tenebrosum, admotum luci clarescere, remotum a luce nigrescere? Tale quiddam est anima, non tale aliquid Deus. Potest et homo dicere, habere se lucem nunc in oculis suis. Dicant ergo quasi quadam voce propria oculi tui si possunt : Habemus lucem in nobis ipsis. Contra dicitur : Non proprie dicitis habere vos lucem in vobis ipsis : habetis lucem, sed in coelo ; habetis lucem, si forte nox est, sed in luna, in lucernis, non in vobis ipsis : nam clausi amittitis, quod aperti percipitis. Non in vobis ipsis habetis lucem : sole occidente tenete lucem, si po⟨t⟩estis : nox est, et lumine nocturno perfruimini ; subducta lucerna tenete lucem : cum vero subtracta lucerna in tenebris remanetis, non lucem in vobis ipsis habetis. Hoc est ergo habere lucem in semetipso, non indigere luce ex altero. Ecce ubi, si quis intelligat, ostendit Filium aequalem Patri, ubi ait, Sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio vitam habere in semetipso : ut hoc solum intersit inter Patrem et Filium, quia Pater habet vitam in semetipso, quam nemo ei dedit ; Filius autem habet vitam in semetipso, quam Pater dedit.
what it had lost: the life of the soul is changeable. And when the soul lives in iniquity, that is its death; but when it becomes just, it becomes a partaker of another life, which is not what it itself is; for by raising itself up to God and cleaving to God, it is justified by Him. For it has been said: To him who believes in Him Who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness (Rom. 4:5). By falling away from Him it becomes unjust; by advancing towards Him it becomes just. Does it not seem to you that something cold, as it were, brought near to fire grows hot, and removed from the fire grows numb? Does it not seem to you that something dark, brought near to light, grows bright, and removed from the light grows black? Such a thing is the soul; God is not such a thing. A man too can say that he has light now in his eyes. Let your eyes, then, say, as it were with a voice of their own, if they can: We have light in ourselves. It is said in reply: You do not properly say that you have light in yourselves: you have light, but in the sky; you have light, if perhaps it is night, but in the moon, in lamps, not in yourselves; for when closed you lose what when open you perceive. You do not have light in yourselves: when the sun sets, keep hold of the light, if you can; it is night, and you enjoy the light of night; when the lamp is taken away, keep hold of the light; but when, the lamp having been withdrawn, you remain in darkness, you do not have light in yourselves. This, then, is to have light in oneself: not to need light from another. See where, if anyone understands, He shows the Son equal to the Father, where He says, As the Father has life in Himself, so He has given also to the Son to have life in Himself: so that this alone is the difference between the Father and the Son, that the Father has life in Himself which no one gave Him, whereas the Son has life in Himself which the Father gave.
12. Sed etiam hic oritur aliquod nubilum discutiendum. Non deficiamus, intenti simus : pascua mentis sunt, non fastidiamus, ut vivamus. Ecce, inquis, fateris ipse quod vitam Filio Pater dedit, ut habeat eam quidem in semetipso, sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, non indigens ille, non indigeat et iste ; ut sit ille vita, sit et iste ; et utrumque conjunctum una vita, non duae ; quia unus Deus, non duo dii : et hoc ipsum sit esse vitam. Quomodo ergo dedit Filio vitam Pater? Non sic quasi ante fuerit Filius sine vita, atque ut viveret a Patre acceperit vitam : nam si hoc esset, non haberet vitam in semetipso. Ecce de anima loquebar. Est anima : etsi non sit sapiens, etsi non sit justa, anima est ; etsi non sit pia, anima est. Aliud illi ergo est esse animam, aliud vero esse sapientem, esse justam, esse piam. Est ergo aliquid quo nondum est sapiens, nondum justa, nondum pia ; non tamen nihil est, non tamen nulla vita est : nam ex operibus quibusdam suis ostendit se vitam, etsi non se ostendit sapientem, piam, justam. Nisi enim viveret, corpus non moveret ; pedibus gressum, manibus opus, oculis intuitum, auribus auditum non imperaret ; non aperiret os ad vocem, linguam ad distinctionem vocum non moveret. His itaque operibus vivere se ostendit, et esse aliquid quod sit corpore melius : sed numquid his operibus, sapientem, piam, justam se ostendit?
12. But here too there arises a certain cloud that must be dispersed. Let us not grow faint, let us be attentive: these are pastures of the mind; let us not disdain them, that we may live. See, you say, you yourself admit that the Father gave life to the Son, so that He has it indeed in Himself, just as the Father has life in Himself; as the One does not need, so the other should not need either; that as the One is life, so the other is too; and both joined together are one life, not two, because there is one God, not two gods; and that this very thing is to be life. How then did the Father give life to the Son? Not as though the Son had previously existed without life, and received life from the Father in order to live: for if that were so, He would not have life in Himself. See, I was speaking about the soul. The soul exists: even if it is not wise, even if it is not just, it is a soul; even if it is not godly, it is a soul. So for it to be a soul is one thing, but to be wise, to be just, to be godly is another. There is, then, something by which it is not yet wise, not yet just, not yet godly; yet it is not nothing, yet it is not no life at all: for by certain of its works it shows itself to be life, even if it does not show itself wise, godly, just. For unless it lived, it would not move the body; it would not command walking from the feet, work from the hands, sight from the eyes, hearing from the ears; it would not open the mouth for speech, nor move the tongue to the articulation of words. By these works, therefore, it shows that it lives, and that it is something better than the body: but surely it does not by these works show itself wise, godly, just?
Editors' notes and page, col. 1549

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: ostendit se vitam› · call in col 1549

Er. Lugd. Ven. Lov. pro, vitam, ferunt, vivam. M.

Erasmus, the Lyons, Venice and Louvain editions read "vivam" ("living") for "vitam" ("life"). M.

(printed under page 123)

Page

  • running head: 1549 TRACTATUS XIX. CA (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1550
Nonne ambulant, operantur, vident, audiunt, loquuntur et stulti, et impii, et injusti? Cum vero se erigit ad aliquid quod ipsa non est, et quod supra ipsam est, et a quo ipsa est, percipit sapientiam, justitiam, pietatem: sine quibus cum esset, mortua erat, nec vitam habebat qua ipsa viveret, sed qua corpus vivificaret. Aliud est enim in anima unde corpus vivificatur, aliud unde ipsa vivificatur. Melius quippe est quam corpus; sed melius quam ipse est Deus. Est ergo ipsa, etiamsi sit insipiens, injusta, impia, vita corporis. Quia vero vita ejus est Deus, quomodo cum ipsa est in corpore, praestat illi vigorem, decorem, mobilitatem, officia membrorum; sic cum vita ejus Deus in ipsa est, praestat illi sapientiam, pietatem, justitiam, charitatem. Aliud est ergo quod praestatur corpori de anima; aliud quod praestatur animae de Deo: vivificat, et vivificatur; mortua vivificat, si ipsa non vivificatur. Veniente itaque verbo et infuso audientibus, factisque illis non solum audientibus, sed etiam obedientibus, resurgit anima a morte sua ad vitam suam; hoc est, ab iniquitate, ab insipientia, ab impietate ad Deum suum, qui est illi sapientia, justitia, claritas. Surgat ad illum, illuminetur ab illo. Accedite, inquit, ad eum. Et quid nobis erit? Et illuminamini (Psal. XXXIII, 5). Si ergo accedendo illuminamini, et recedendo tenebramini; non erat in vobis lumen vestrum, sed in Deo vestro. Accedite, ut resurgatis: si recesseritis, moriemini. Si ergo accedendo vivitis, recedendo morimini; non erat in vobis vita vestra. Ipsa est enim vita vestra, quae est lux vestra. Quoniam apud te est fons vitae, et in lumine tao videbimus lumen (Psal. XXXV, 10).
Do not the foolish too, and the ungodly, and the unjust, walk, work, see, hear, speak? But when it raises itself up to something which it itself is not, and which is above it, and from which it itself is, it receives wisdom, justice, godliness: and while it was without these, it was dead, and did not have a life by which it itself might live, but only one by which it might give life to the body. For that in the soul from which the body is given life is one thing, and that from which the soul itself is given life is another. For it is better than the body; but better than it is God. So the soul, even if it is foolish, unjust, ungodly, is the life of the body. But since its life is God, just as, when it is in the body, it furnishes it with vigour, comeliness, mobility, the functions of the limbs, so, when God its life is in it, He furnishes it with wisdom, godliness, justice, charity. So that which is furnished to the body from the soul is one thing; that which is furnished to the soul from God is another: it gives life, and is given life; dead, it gives life, if it is not itself given life. Therefore, when the word comes and is poured into those who hear, and they are made not only hearers but also obeyers, the soul rises again from its death to its life; that is, from iniquity, from folly, from ungodliness to its God, Who is to it wisdom, justice, brightness. Let it rise to Him, let it be enlightened by Him. Approach, he says, to Him. And what will there be for us? And be enlightened (Ps. 33:5). If, then, by approaching you are enlightened, and by withdrawing you are darkened, your light was not in you, but in your God. Approach, that you may rise again: if you withdraw, you will die. If, then, by approaching you live, by withdrawing you die, your life was not in you. For that same is your life which is your light. For with Thee is the fountain of life, and in Thy light we shall see light (Ps. 35:10).
13. Non ergo sicut anima aliquid aliud est antequam illuminetur, et fit melius cum illuminatur participatione melioris; ita et Verbum Dei, Filius Dei, aliquid aliud erat antequam acciperet vitam, ut participando habeat vitam: sed vitam habet in semetipso; ac per hoc ipse est ipsa vita. Quid ergo ait, Dedit Filio vitam habere in semetipso? Breviter dixerim, Genuit Filium. Neque enim erat sine vita, et accepit vitam; sed nascendo vita est. Pater vita est non nascendo; Filius vita est nascendo. Pater de nullo patre, Filius de Deo Patre. Pater quod est, a nullo est: quod autem Pater est, propter Filium est. Filius vero et quod Filius est, propter Patrem est; et quod est, a Patre est. Hoc ergo dixit, Vitam dedit Filio, ut haberet eam in semetipso; tanquam diceret, Pater qui est vita in semetipso, genuit Filium qui esset vita in semetipso. Pro eo enim quod est genuit, voluit intelligi dedit. Tanquam si cuiquam diceremus, Dedit tibi Deus esse. Cui dedit? Si alicui jam existenti dedit esse, non ei dedit esse; quia erat, antequam ei daretur, qui posset accipere. Cum ergo audis, Dedit tibi esse, non eras qui acciperes, et existendo accepisti ut esses. Dedit structor domui huic ut esset. Sed quid ei dedit? Ut domus esset. Cui dedit? Huic domui. Quid ei dedit? Ut domus esset. Quomodo potuit dare domui ut domus esset? Etenim si domus erat; cui daret, ut domus esset, quando jam domus erat? Quid est
13. So it is not the case that, just as the soul is something else before it is enlightened, and becomes better when it is enlightened by participation in what is better, so too the Word of God, the Son of God, was something else before He received life, so that He might have life by participating: rather, He has life in Himself; and for this reason He Himself is Life itself. What, then, does He mean by, He gave to the Son to have life in Himself? I would say briefly: He begot the Son. For He was not without life and then received life; but by being born He is Life. The Father is Life by not being born; the Son is Life by being born. The Father is from no father, the Son from God the Father. That which the Father is, He is from no one: but that He is Father, He is on account of the Son. But the Son, both that He is Son, He is on account of the Father; and that which He is, He is from the Father. This, then, is what He said, He gave life to the Son, that He might have it in Himself; as if He were saying, The Father, Who is Life in Himself, begot the Son, Who should be Life in Himself. For in place of begot He wished gave to be understood. As if we were to say to someone, God gave you to be. To whom did He give it? If He gave being to someone already existing, He did not give him being; for there was, before it was given him, someone who could receive it. So when you hear, He gave you to be, you were not someone who might receive it, and by existing you received it, that you might be. A builder gave to this house that it should be. But what did he give it? That it should be a house. To whom did he give it? To this house. What did he give it? That it should be a house. How could he give to a house that it should be a house? For if it was a house, to what would he give that it should be a house, when it was already a house? What is
Editors' notes and page, col. 1550

Page

  • running head: [TRAC]TATUS XIX. CAPUT V. 1550
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: left column (end of col. 1549) visible at image edge, not set; no marginal letters visible beside this column; "M." at foot of left column not set; column ends mid-sentence at "Quid est"
  • misprints kept as printed: "in lumine tao" (for tuo), in the Psalm citation at the end of §12.
PL 35:1551
ergo, Dedit ei ut domus esset? Fecit ut domus esset. Quid ergo Filio dedit? Dedit ei ut Filius esset, genuit ut vita esset: hoc est, Dedit ei habere vitam in semetipso, ut esset vita non egens vita, ne participando intelligatur habere vitam. Si enim participando haberet vitam, posset et amittendo esse sine vita: hoc in Filio ne accipias, ne cogites, ne credas. Manet ergo Pater vita, manet et Filius vita: Pater vita in semetipso, non a Filio; Filius vita in semetipso, sed a Patre. A Patre genitus ut esset vita in semetipso: Pater vero non genitus vita in semetipso. Nec minorem Filium genuit, qui crescendo fieret aequalis. Non enim ad sui perfectionem adjutus est tempore, per quem perfectum creata sunt tempora. Ante omnia tempora Patri coaeternus est. Non enim unquam Pater sine Filio: aeternus autem Pater est; ergo coaeternus et Filius. Quid tu, anima? Mortua eras, amiseras vitam, audi Patrem per Filium. Surge, recipe vitam; ut in eo recipias vitam quam non habes in te, qui habet vitam in semetipso. Vivificat ergo te Pater, et Filius; et agitur prima resurrectio, quando resurgis ad participandam vitam quod tu non es, et participando efficeris vivens. Resurge a morte tua in vitam tuam, qui est Deus tuus; et transi a morte in vitam aeternam. Habet enim vitam aeternam Pater in semetipso; et nisi Filium talem generaret, qui haberet vitam in semetipso, non sicut Pater suscitat mortuos et vivificat, sic et Filius quos vellet vivificaret.
then, Did he give it to be a house? He made it to be a house. What then did He give to the Son? He gave Him to be the Son, He begot Him to be life: that is, He gave Him to have life in Himself, so that He should be life not needing life, lest He be understood to have life by participating. For if He had life by participating, He could also, by losing it, be without life: do not take this of the Son, do not think it, do not believe it. The Father therefore remains life, and the Son also remains life: the Father life in Himself, not from the Son; the Son life in Himself, but from the Father. Begotten of the Father so as to be life in Himself; but the Father, not begotten, is life in Himself. Nor did He beget a lesser Son, who by growing should become equal. For He was not helped towards His own perfection by time, He through Whom, being perfect, times were created. Before all times He is coeternal with the Father. For the Father was never without the Son; but the Father is eternal; therefore the Son is coeternal too. What of you, soul? You were dead, you had lost life; hear the Father through the Son. Rise, receive life again, so that in Him Who has life in Himself you may receive the life which you do not have in yourself. The Father therefore quickens you, and the Son; and the first resurrection takes place when you rise to participate in life, which you are not, and by participating are made living. Rise from your death into your life, Who is your God; and pass from death into eternal life. For the Father has eternal life in Himself; and unless He had begotten such a Son, Who had life in Himself, the Son would not quicken whom He would, as the Father raises the dead and quickens them.
14. Quid ergo de illa resurrectione corporis? Nam isti qui audiunt et vivunt, unde, nisi audiendo, vivunt? Amicus enim sponsi stat et audit eum, et gaudio gaudet propter vocem sponsi (Joan. III, 29), non propter vocem suam; hoc est, participando, non existendo audiunt et vivunt: et omnes qui audiunt, vivunt; quia omnes qui obediunt, vivunt. Dic aliquid, Domine, etiam de resurrectione carnis. Fuerunt enim qui eam negarent, et dicerent quia ista sola est resurrectio quae fit per fidem. Cujus resurrectionis modo Dominus fecit commemorationem, et inflammavit nos, quia quidam mortui audient vocem Filii Dei, et vivent. Non eorum qui audierint alii morientur, et alii vivent; sed omnes qui audierint vivent, quia omnes qui obedierint vivent. Ecce videmus resurrectionem mentis: non ergo amittamus fidem de resurrectione carnis. Et nisi tu, Domine Jesu, dixeris eam, quem opponemus contradictoribus? Omnes enim sectae, quae se aliquam religionem hominibus inserere praesumpserunt, non negaverunt istam mentium resurrectionem: ne diceretur eis, Si non resurgit anima, quare mihi loqueris? quid in me facere vis? si non facis ex deteriore meliorem, quare loqueris? si non facis ex iniquo justum, quare loqueris? si autem facis ex iniquo justum, ex impio pium, ex stulto sapientem, fateris resurgere animam meam, si tibi obtemperavero, si tibi credidero. Volentes
14. What then of that resurrection of the body? For these who hear and live, whence do they live, if not by hearing? For the friend of the bridegroom stands and hears him, and rejoices with joy because of the bridegroom's voice (John 3:29), not because of his own voice; that is, they hear and live by participating, not by being [life of themselves]: and all who hear, live; because all who obey, live. Say something, Lord, also about the resurrection of the flesh. For there were those who denied it, and said that this alone is the resurrection which comes about through faith. Of which resurrection the Lord just now made mention, and inflamed us, because certain dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and shall live. It is not that of those who have heard some shall die and others shall live; but all who have heard shall live, because all who have obeyed shall live. Behold, we see the resurrection of the mind: let us not therefore lose faith concerning the resurrection of the flesh. And unless Thou, Lord Jesus, speak of it, whom shall we set against those who contradict? For all the sects which have presumed to implant some religion in men have not denied this resurrection of minds: lest it be said to them, If the soul does not rise, why do you speak to me? what do you want to do in me? if you do not make the worse better, why do you speak? if you do not make the unjust just, why do you speak? but if you make the unjust just, the impious pious, the foolish wise, you admit that my soul rises again, if I obey you, if I believe you. Wishing
Editors' notes and page, col. 1551

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: nos, quia quidam› · call in col 1551

In quatuor Mss., quidem.

In four manuscripts: "quidem" ("indeed") for "quidam" ("some").

(printed under page 124)

(2) ‹anchor: resurrectione carnis› · call in col 1551

Mss. magno consensu : Non ergo amittamus de fide resurrectionem carnis.

The manuscripts, with broad agreement: "Let us not, then, lose the resurrection of the flesh from the faith."

(printed under page 124)

(3) ‹anchor: hominibus inserere› · call in col 1551

Sic Mss. At editi : Se aliqua religione hominibus inserere.

So the manuscripts. But the printed editions: "to insinuate themselves among men by some religion."

(printed under page 124)

Page

  • running head: IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S. (cut off at the image edge); column number 1551
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1552
ergo sibi credi omnes qui instituerunt alicujus etiam falsae religionis sectam, negare istam mentium resurrectionem non potuerunt; omnes de illa consenserunt: sed multi carnis resurrectionem negaverunt; dixerunt in fide jam factam esse resurrectionem. Talibus resistit Apostolus, dicens: Ex quibus est Hymenaeus et Philetus, qui circa veritatem aberraverunt, dicentes resurrectionem jam factam esse, et fidem quorumdam subvertunt (II Tim. II, 17, 18). Jam factam esse resurrectionem dicebant, sed eo modo ut alia non speraretur: et reprehendebant homines qui sperabant resurrectionem carnis, velut jam resurrectio quae promissa erat, credendo impleretur in mente. Reprehendit eos Apostolus. Cur eos reprehendit? Nonne hoc dicebant quod modo Dominus loquebatur, Venit hora, et nunc est, quando mortui audient vocem Filii Dei; et qui audierint, vivent? Sed de vita mentium loquor adhuc, ait tibi Jesus: nondum loquor de vita corporum; sed loquor de vita vitae corporum, id est, de animarum, in quibus est vita corporum: nam scio esse corpora in monumentis jacentia, scio et corpora vestra in monumentis futura; nondum de illa resurrectione loquor: de ista loquor, in ista resurgite, ne ad poenam in illa resurgatis. Sed ut noveritis quia de illa loquor, quid addo? Sicut enim habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio habere vitam in semetipso. Haec vita quod Pater est, quod Filius est, ad quid pertinet? ad animam, an ad corpus? Non enim vitam illam sapientiae sentit corpus, sed mens rationalis. Nam nec omnis anima potest sentire sapientiam. Habet enim et pecus animam; sed pecoris anima non potest sentire sapientiam. Ergo anima humana potest sentire istam vitam quam habet Pater in semetipso, et dedit Filio vitam habere in semetipso; quia illud est verum lumen quod illuminat, non omnem animam, sed omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum. Cum ergo ipsi menti loquor, audiat, id est obediat, et vivat.
therefore to be believed, all who have founded the sect of any religion, even a false one, have been unable to deny this resurrection of minds; all have agreed about it: but many have denied the resurrection of the flesh; they have said that the resurrection has already taken place in faith. Such men the Apostle resists, saying: Of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus, who have strayed concerning the truth, saying that the resurrection has already taken place, and they overturn the faith of some (2 Tim. 2:17–18). They said that the resurrection had already taken place, but in such a way that no other was to be hoped for: and they rebuked men who hoped for the resurrection of the flesh, as though the resurrection which had been promised were already fulfilled in the mind by believing. The Apostle rebukes them. Why does he rebuke them? Were they not saying what the Lord was just now saying, The hour comes, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God; and those who hear shall live? But I am still speaking of the life of minds, Jesus says to you: I am not yet speaking of the life of bodies; but I am speaking of the life of the life of bodies, that is, of souls, in which is the life of bodies: for I know that there are bodies lying in tombs, I know that your bodies too will be in tombs; I am not yet speaking of that resurrection: I am speaking of this one; in this one rise again, lest you rise again to punishment in that one. But that you may know that I am speaking of that one, what do I add? For as the Father has life in Himself, so He has given also to the Son to have life in Himself. This life which the Father is, which the Son is, to what does it pertain? to the soul, or to the body? For the body does not perceive that life of wisdom, but the rational mind. For not every soul can perceive wisdom. For a beast too has a soul; but the soul of a beast cannot perceive wisdom. Therefore the human soul can perceive this life which the Father has in Himself, and He has given to the Son to have life in Himself; because that is the true light which enlightens, not every soul, but every man coming into this world. When therefore I speak to the mind itself, let it hear, that is, let it obey, and live.
15. Noli itaque, Domine, tacere de resurrectione carnis; ne non eam credant homines, et remaneamus nos argumentatores, non praedicatores. Ergo sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio habere vitam in semetipso. Intelligant qui audiunt, credant ut intelligant, obediant ut vivant. Audiant adhuc aliud, ne hic finitam esse resurrectionem putent. Et dedit ei potestatem et judicium facere. Quis? Pater. Cui dedit? Filio. Cui enim dedit habere vitam in semetipso, potestatem dedit ei et judicium facere. Quia filius hominis est. Iste enim Christus, et Filius Dei et filius hominis est. In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum; hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Ecce quomodo dedit ei vitam habere in semetipso. Sed quia Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, 9, 1, 2, 14), ex virgine Maria homo factus, filius hominis est. Proinde quia filius hominis est, quid accepit? Potestatem et judicium facere. Quod judicium? In fine saeculi: et ibi erit resurrectio mortuorum, sed corporum. Animas ergo suscitat Deus, per Christum Filium Dei: corpora suscitat
15. Do not therefore, Lord, keep silent about the resurrection of the flesh; lest men not believe it, and we remain arguers, not preachers. Therefore, as the Father has life in Himself, so He has given also to the Son to have life in Himself. Let those who hear understand, let them believe that they may understand, let them obey that they may live. Let them hear something further still, lest they think that the resurrection is finished here. And He has given Him power also to do judgement. Who? The Father. To whom has He given it? To the Son. For to Him to whom He gave to have life in Himself, He gave power also to do judgement. Because He is the son of man. For this Christ is both the Son of God and the son of man. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; this was in the beginning with God. Behold how He gave Him to have life in Himself. But because the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (John 1:9, 1, 2, 14), made man of the Virgin Mary, He is the son of man. Accordingly, because He is the son of man, what did He receive? Power also to do judgement. What judgement? At the end of the world: and there will be the resurrection of the dead, but of bodies. Souls therefore God raises up through Christ the Son of God: bodies God raises
Editors' notes and page, col. 1552

Page

  • running head: [...]ANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1552
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at the left edge of the image, only "ANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1552" visible; no marginal letters visible beside this column (the gutter lies in the cut-off part); column begins mid-sentence ("ergo sibi credi", continuing from col. 1551); last word "sus-" split at the column break (suscitat); "Sed ut noveritis quia de illa loquor" set as printed, though sense might expect "de ista", UNSURE whether this is a misprint; in "(Joan. I, 9, 1, 2, 14)" the first numeral was read as a small-capital I; fragments of col. 1551 at the left edge, including the italic lines "s de fide re-" / "ibus inserere." at its foot, not set
  • other: the word suscitat was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1553
PL 35:1553
Deus, per eumdem Christum filium hominis. Dedit ei potestatem. Hanc potestatem non haberet nisi acciperet, et esset homo sine potestate. Sed ipse est filius hominis, qui et Filius Dei. Haerendo enim ad unitatem personae filius hominis Filio Dei, facta est una persona, eademque Filius Dei, quae et filius hominis. Quid autem propter quid habeat, dignoscendum est. Filius hominis habet animam, habet corpus. Filius Dei, quod est Verbum Dei, habet hominem, tanquam anima corpus. Sicut anima habens corpus, non facit duas personas, sed unum hominem; sic Verbum habens hominem, non facit duas personas, sed unum Christum. Quid est homo? Anima rationalis habens corpus. Quid est Christus? Verbum Dei habens hominem. Video de quibus rebus loquar, et quis loquar, et quibus loquar.
through the same Christ, the Son of man. He gave Him authority. This authority He would not have unless He had received it, and He would be a man without authority. But He Himself is the Son of man Who is also the Son of God. For by the Son of man's cleaving to the Son of God into unity of person, one person was made, and the same is Son of God Who is also Son of man. But what He has on account of what, must be discerned. The Son of man has a soul, has a body. The Son of God, which is the Word of God, has a man, as the soul has a body. Just as the soul having a body does not make two persons but one man, so the Word having a man does not make two persons but one Christ. What is man? A rational soul having a body. What is Christ? The Word of God having a man. I see about what matters I am speaking, and who I am that speak, and to whom I speak.
16. Nunc audite de resurrectione corporum, non me, sed Dominum locuturum, propter eos qui resurrexerunt surgendo a morte, inhaerendo vitae. Cui vitae? Quae non novit mortem. Quare non novit mortem? Quia nescit mutabilitatem. Quare nescit mutabilitatem? Quia vita est in semetipso. Et potestatem dedit ei et judicium facere, quia filius hominis est. Quod judicium, quale judicium? Nolite mirari hoc, quia dixi, Dedit ei potestatem et judicium facere. Quia venit hora. Non addidit, et nunc est: ergo horam quamdam vult insinuare in fine saeculi. Hora nunc est ut resurgant mortui, hora erit in fine saeculi ut resurgant mortui: sed resurgant nunc in mente, tunc in carne; resurgant nunc in mente per Verbum Dei Filium Dei, resurgant tunc in carne per Verbum Dei carnem factum, filium hominis. Neque enim ad judicium vivorum et mortuorum Pater ipse venturus est: nec tamen recedit a Filio Pater. Quomodo ergo non ipse venturus est? Quia non ipse videbitur in judicio. Videbunt in quem pupugerunt (Joan. XIX, 37). Forma illa erit judex, quae stetit sub judice; illa judicabit quae judicata est: judicata est enim inique, judicabit juste. Veniet ergo forma servi, et ipsa apparebit. Etenim forma Dei quomodo appareret justis et iniquis? Nam si judicium non fieret nisi inter solos justos, appareret tanquam justis forma Dei: quia vero judicium futurum est justorum et iniquorum, nec licet ut iniqui videant Deum; Beati enim mundi corde, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt (Matth. V, 8); talis apparebit judex, qualis videri possit et ab eis quos coronaturus est, et ab eis quos damnaturus est. Forma ergo servi videbitur, occulta erit forma Dei. Occultus erit in servo Filius Dei, et apparebit filius hominis; quia potestatem dedit ei et judicium facere, quia filius hominis est. Et quia ipse solus apparebit in forma servi, Pater autem non apparebit, quia non est indutus forma servi; ideo superius ait, Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio. Bene ergo dilatum est, ut ipse esset expositor qui propositor. Superius enim occultum erat; nunc jam, ut arbitror, manifestum est quia dedit ei potestatem et judicium facere, quia Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio: quia judicium per illam formam futurum est, quam
16. Now hear about the resurrection of bodies, not from me but from the Lord, Who is about to speak, for the sake of those who have risen again by rising from death, by cleaving to life. To what life? To the life that has not known death. Why has it not known death? Because it knows no mutability. Why does it know no mutability? Because it is life in itself. And He has given Him authority also to execute judgement, because He is the Son of man. What judgement, what sort of judgement? Do not marvel at this, that I said, He has given Him authority also to execute judgement. For the hour is coming. He did not add, and now is: therefore He means to intimate a certain hour at the end of the world. The hour is now that the dead should rise; the hour will be at the end of the world that the dead should rise: but let them rise now in mind, then in flesh; let them rise now in mind through the Word of God, the Son of God; let them rise then in flesh through the Word of God made flesh, the Son of man. For the Father Himself is not going to come to the judgement of the living and the dead; and yet the Father does not withdraw from the Son. How then is He Himself not going to come? Because He Himself will not be seen in the judgement. They shall look on Him Whom they pierced (John 19:37). That form will be judge which stood under a judge; that form will judge which was judged: for it was judged unjustly, it will judge justly. The form of a servant, therefore, will come, and it will appear. For how could the form of God appear to the just and the unjust? For if the judgement were held only among the just, the form of God would appear as to the just: but since the judgement to come is of the just and the unjust, and it is not permitted that the unjust should see God, for Blessed are the clean of heart, for they shall see God (Matt. 5:8), the judge will appear such as can be seen both by those whom He is going to crown and by those whom He is going to condemn. The form of a servant, therefore, will be seen; the form of God will be hidden. The Son of God will be hidden in the servant, and the Son of man will appear; for He has given Him authority also to execute judgement, because He is the Son of man. And because He alone will appear in the form of a servant, but the Father will not appear, since He has not put on the form of a servant, therefore He said above, The Father judges no one, but has given all judgement to the Son. It was well, then, that it was deferred, so that He Who propounded it might Himself be its expounder. For above it was hidden; now already, as I think, it is manifest that He has given Him authority also to execute judgement, because the Father judges no one, but has given all judgement to the Son: because the judgement to come will be through that form which
Editors' notes and page, col. 1553

Page

  • running head: 1553 TRACTATUS XIX. CAP (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "citat", the rest of a word broken from column 1552 (probably suscitat), set as printed; "pupugerunt" is faintly printed but read as such; right-hand column (1554) partly visible in the images and not set
PL 35:1554
non habet Pater. Et quale judicium? Nolite mirari hoc; quia venit hora: non ea quae nunc est, ut resurgant animae; sed quae futura est, ut resurgant corpora.
the Father does not have. And what sort of judgement? Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming: not that which is now, that souls may rise again; but that which is to come, that bodies may rise again.
17. Expressius hoc dicat, ut calumniam haereticus negator resurrectionis corporis non inveniat: quanquam jam intellectus elucescat. Cum superius dictum esset, Venit hora; addidit, et nunc est: modo autem, Venit hora; non addidit, et nunc est. Tamen omnes ansas, omnes claviculas calumniarum, omnes nodos laqueorum aperta veritate disrumpat. Nolite mirari hoc; quia venit hora, in qua omnes qui in monumentis sunt. Quid evidentius? quid expressius? Corpora sunt in monumentis: animae non sunt in monumentis, nec justorum, nec iniquorum. Justi anima in sinu Abrahae fuit, iniqui anima apud inferos torquebatur (Luc. XVI, 22-25): in monumento, nec illa, nec illa. Superius quando ait, Venit hora, et nunc est; obsecro, intendite. Nostis, fratres, quia ad panem ventris cum labore pervenitur; quanto magis ad panem mentis? Cum labore statis, et auditis; sed nos cum majore stamus, et loquimur. Si laboramus propter vos, collaborare non debetis propter eosdem vos? Superius ergo cum diceret, Venit hora, et adderet, et nunc est, quid subjecit? Quando mortui audient vocem Filii Dei, et qui audierint vivent. Non dixit, Omnes mortui audient, et qui audierint vivent: mortuos enim iniquos volebat intelligi. Et numquid omnes iniqui obaudiunt Evangelio? Aperte dicit Apostolus, Sed non omnes obaudiunt Evangelio (Rom. X, 16). Tamen qui audiunt, vivent; quia omnes qui obaudiunt Evangelio, transient ad vitam aeternam per fidem: non tamen omnes obaudiunt, et hoc nunc est. At vero in fine, omnes qui sunt in monumentis, hoc est justi et injusti, audient vocem ejus, et procedent. Quomodo noluit dicere, et vivent? Omnes enim procedent, sed non omnes vivent. In eo quippe quod supra dixit, Et qui audierint vivent; in ipsa obauditione vitam aeternam intelligi voluit et beatam, quam non omnes habebunt qui de monumentis procedent. Jam ergo et commemoratione monumentorum, et expressione processionis de monumentis, aperte intelligimus corporum resurrectionem.
17. Let Him say this more explicitly, so that the heretic who denies the resurrection of the body may find no ground for cavil: although the meaning is already becoming clear. When it had been said above, The hour is coming, He added, and now is: but now, The hour is coming, He did not add, and now is. Yet let Him burst all the handles, all the little hooks of cavils, all the knots of snares, by open truth. Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming, in which all who are in the tombs. What is more evident? What more explicit? Bodies are in the tombs: souls are not in the tombs, neither those of the just nor those of the wicked. The soul of the just man was in Abraham's bosom, the soul of the wicked man was being tormented in the underworld (Luke 16:22–25): in the tomb was neither the one nor the other. When He says above, The hour is coming, and now is, I beseech you, give heed. You know, brothers, that bread for the belly is reached with labour; how much more bread for the mind? You stand and listen with labour; but we stand and speak with greater labour. If we labour for your sake, ought you not to labour with us for the sake of your own selves? So above, when He said, The hour is coming, and added, and now is, what did He append? When the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear shall live. He did not say, All the dead shall hear, and those who hear shall live: for He wished the wicked to be understood as the dead. And do all the wicked obey the Gospel? The Apostle says openly, But not all obey the Gospel (Rom. 10:16). Yet those who hear shall live; because all who obey the Gospel will pass over to eternal life through faith: yet not all obey, and this is now. But at the end, all who are in the tombs, that is, the just and the unjust, shall hear His voice, and shall come forth. Why did He not wish to say, and shall live? For all shall come forth, but not all shall live. For in what He said above, And those who hear shall live, He wished eternal and blessed life to be understood in that very obedience, which not all who come forth from the tombs will have. So now, both by the mention of the tombs and by the expression of the coming forth from the tombs, we clearly understand the resurrection of bodies.
18. Audient omnes vocem ejus, et procedent. Et ubi judicium, si omnes audient, et omnes procedent? Quasi totum confusum est; nihil video discretum. Certe accepisti potestatem judicandi, quia filius hominis es; ecce aderis in judicio, resurgent corpora: de ipso judicio dic aliquid, hoc est de discretione malorum et bonorum. Et hoc audi: Qui bona fecerunt, in resurrectione vitae; qui mala egerunt, in resurrectionem judicii. Superius cum de resurrectione mentium et animarum loqueretur, numquid fecit discretionem? Sed omnes qui audient, vivent; quia obaudiendo vivent. At vero resurgendo et procedendo de monumentis, non omnes ad vitam aeternam ibunt, sed qui bene fecerunt: qui autem male, ad judicium. Hic enim judicium pro poena posuit. Et erit diremptio, et non qualis modo est. Nam et modo separamur non locis, sed moribus, affectibus, desideriis, fide, spe,
18. All shall hear His voice, and shall come forth. And where is the judgement, if all shall hear and all shall come forth? It is as though the whole were confused; I see nothing distinguished. Surely Thou hast received the power of judging, because Thou art the Son of Man; behold, Thou wilt be present at the judgement, bodies will rise again: say something about the judgement itself, that is, about the separation of the evil and the good. And hear this: Those who have done good things, unto the resurrection of life; those who have done evil things, unto the resurrection of judgement. Above, when He was speaking of the resurrection of minds and souls, did He make a distinction? No, all who hear shall live; because by obeying they shall live. But in rising again and coming forth from the tombs, not all will go to eternal life, but those who have done well: those, however, who have done evil, to judgement. For here He has put judgement for punishment. And there will be a separation, and not such as there is now. For even now we are separated, not by places, but by morals, affections, desires, faith, hope,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1554

Page

  • running head: ...ATUS XIX. CAPUT V. 1554 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1555
charitate. Simul enim cum iniquis vivimus; sed non una vita est omnium: in occulto dirimimur, in occulto separamur; quomodo grana in area, non quomodo grana in horreo. Et separantur grana in area, et miscentur: separantur, cum a palea exspoliantur; miscentur, quia nondum ventilantur. Tunc aperta erit separatio, sicut morum, sic et vitae; sicut sapientiae, ita et corporum. Ibunt qui bene fecerunt, vivere cum Angelis Dei: qui male egerunt, torqueri cum diabolo et angelis ejus. Et transiet forma servi. Ad hoc enim se praesentaverat ut faceret judicium: post judicium perget hinc, ducet secum corpus cui caput est, et offeret regnum Deo (I Cor. XV, 24). Tunc plane videbitur forma illa Dei, quae non potuit videri ab iniquis, quorum visioni forma servi exhibenda erat. Dicit et alibi sic: Ibunt isti in ambustionem aeternam (de quibusdam sinistris); justi autem in vitam aeternam (Matth. XXV, 46): de qua alio loco dicit, Haec est autem vita aeterna, ut cognoscant te unum verum Deum, et quem misisti Jesum Christum (Joan. XVII, 3). Tunc ibi apparebit qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo (Philipp. II, 6): tunc se ostendet quomodo se dilectoribus suis ostensurum promisit. Qui enim diligit me, ait, mandata mea custodit; et qui diligit me, diligetur a Patre meo, et ego diligam eum, et ostendam meipsum illi. Quibus loquebatur, praesens eis erat: sed formam servi videbant; formam autem Dei non videbant. Per jumentum ad stabulum ducebantur curandi, sed sanati videbunt; quia ostendam, inquit, meipsum illi. Quomodo ostenditur aequalis Patri? Cum dicit Philippo, Qui me videt, videt et Patrem meum (Joan. XIV, 21, 9).
charity. For we live together with the wicked; but the life of all is not one: in secret we are parted, in secret we are separated; as grains are on the threshing floor, not as grains are in the granary. And the grains are both separated on the threshing floor and mixed: they are separated when they are stripped of the chaff; they are mixed because they are not yet winnowed. Then the separation will be open, of life as of morals; of bodies as of wisdom. Those who have done well will go to live with the angels of God; those who have done evil, to be tormented with the devil and his angels. And the form of the servant will pass away. For to this end He had presented Himself, that He might execute judgement: after the judgement He will go on from here, will lead with Him the body of which He is the head, and will offer the kingdom to God (1 Cor. 15:24). Then will plainly be seen that form of God which could not be seen by the wicked, to whose sight the form of the servant had to be displayed. He also says elsewhere thus: These shall go into everlasting burning (of certain ones on the left); but the just into life everlasting (Matt. 25:46): of which He says in another place, And this is life eternal, that they may know Thee the one true God, and Jesus Christ, Whom Thou hast sent (John 17:3). Then there will appear He Who, when He was in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal to God (Phil. 2:6): then He will show Himself as He promised that He would show Himself to those who love Him. For he who loves Me, He says, keeps My commandments; and he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him, and will show Myself to him. Those to whom He was speaking had Him present with them: but they saw the form of the servant; the form of God, however, they did not see. On the beast of burden they were being led to the inn to be cured, but once healed they will see; for, I will show, He says, Myself to him. How is He shown equal to the Father? When He says to Philip, He who sees Me sees My Father also (John 14:21, 9).
19. Non possum ego a meipso facere quidquam: sicut audio judico, et judicium meum justum est. Quia dicturi illi eramus, Tu judicabis, et Pater non judicabit, quia omne judicium dedit Filio; non ergo secundum Patrem judicabis: adjecit, Non possum ego a meipso facere quidquam: sicut audio judico, et judicium meum justum est; quia non quaero voluntatem meam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me. Certe Filius quos vult vivificat. Non quaerit voluntatem suam, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit illum. Non meam, non propriam; non meam, non filii hominis; non meam, quae resistat Deo. Faciunt enim homines voluntatem suam, non Dei, quando faciunt quod volunt, non quod jubet Deus: quando autem ita faciunt quod volunt, ut tamen sequantur voluntatem Dei, non faciunt voluntatem suam, quamvis quod volunt faciant. Volens fac quod juberis; atque ita et hoc facies quod vis, et non voluntatem tuam facies, sed jubentis.
19. I cannot of Myself do anything: as I hear, I judge, and My judgement is just. Because we were going to say to Him, Thou wilt judge, and the Father will not judge, since He has given all judgement to the Son; therefore Thou wilt not judge according to the Father: He added, I cannot of Myself do anything: as I hear, I judge, and My judgement is just; because I seek not My own will, but the will of Him Who sent Me. Certainly the Son gives life to whom He wills. He seeks not His own will, but the will of Him Who sent Him. Not Mine, not My own; not Mine, not the son of man's; not Mine, such as would resist God. For men do their own will, not God's, when they do what they want, not what God commands: but when they do what they want in such a way that they nevertheless follow the will of God, they do not do their own will, although they do what they want. Willingly do what you are commanded; and so you will both do this which you want, and you will do not your own will, but that of the one who commands.
20. Quid ergo? Sicut audio, ita judico. Audit Filius, et demonstrat ei Pater, et videt Filius Patrem facientem. Et ista distuleramus paulo enucleatius pro viribus pertractare, si tempus nobis peracta lectione et vires remansissent. Si dicam me posse loqui adhuc, forte vos audire jam non potestis. Item forte aviditate audiendi dicitis, Possumus. Melius est ergo ut ego infirmitatem meam fatear, quia jam fatigatus loqui non possum, quam ut vobis jam bene satiatis, adhuc
20. What then? As I hear, so I judge. The Son hears, and the Father shows Him, and the Son sees the Father doing. And these things we had put off, to treat them somewhat more thoroughly according to our strength, if time and strength had remained to us once the reading was finished. If I should say that I can still speak, perhaps you can no longer listen. Again, perhaps out of eagerness to hear, you say, We can. It is better therefore that I confess my weakness, that being now tired I cannot speak, than that to you, already well satisfied, still
Editors' notes and page, col. 1555

Page

  • running head: 1555 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S. [cut off at the image edge]
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head truncated at right edge; "jumentum", "judico" (sec. 20) and "distuleramus" are in slightly damaged type but read clearly; column ends mid-sentence at "adhuc"
PL 35:1556
infundam quod non bene digeratis. Proinde hujus promissionis quam ad hodiernum tempus, si superesset, distuleram, tenete me adjuvante Domino in crastinum debitorem.
pour in what you might not digest well. Accordingly, hold me, with the Lord's help, as your debtor until tomorrow for this promise, which I had put off until today in case any time was left over.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1556

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: profunda intelligentiae› · call in col 1556, Tractatus XX §1 (outside this unit; the note belongs with the next unit's text)

Er. Lugd. et Ven. legunt, profundae intelligentiae. M.

Erasmus and the Lyons and Venice editions read "profundae intelligentiae" ("of deep understanding"). M.

(printed under page 126)

Page

  • running head: …VANGELIUM. S. AUGUSTINI 1556
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the column continues with TRACTATUS XX. (another unit); not set here