Arianorum, alius est quidem Pater, alius Filius; sed ipse Filius non solum alius, sed etiam aliud est: tu in medio quid? Exclusisti sabellianum, exclude et arianum. Pater, Pater est; Filius, Filius est: alius, non aliud; quia ego et Pater, inquit, unum sumus (Joan. X, 30), sicut etiam hesterno die, quantum potui, commendavi. Cum audit, sumus, abscedat confusus sabellianus; cum audit, unum, abscedat confusus arianus: gubernet catholicus inter utrumque fidei suae navigium, quoniam cavendum est in utroque naufragium. Dic ergo tu, quod dicit Eva⟨n⟩gelium, Ego et Pater unum sumus. Non ergo diversum, quia unum; non unus, quia sumus.
of the Arians, the Father is indeed one, the Son another; but the Son Himself is not only another [person], but also another thing: you, in the middle, what [do you say]? You have shut out the Sabellian; shut out the Arian too. The Father is the Father; the Son is the Son: another, not another thing; for I and the Father, He says, are one (John 10:30), as I also set forth yesterday, as far as I was able. When he hears "are", let the Sabellian depart confounded; when he hears "one", let the Arian depart confounded: let the Catholic steer the vessel of his faith between the two, since shipwreck must be guarded against on either side. Say therefore what the Gospel says, I and the Father are one. Therefore not diverse, because one; not one person, because "are".
7. Paulo ante dixit, Judicium meum verum est; quia solus non sum, sed ego et qui misit me Pater: tanquam diceret, Ideo judicium meum est verum, quia Filius Dei sum, quia verum loquor, quia ipsa veritas ego sum. Isti carnaliter intelligentes, dixerunt, Ubi est pater tuus? Modo audi, ariane: Neque me scitis, neque Patrem meum; quia si me sciretis, et Patrem meum sciretis. Quid est, si me sciretis et Patrem, meum sciretis, nisi, ego et Pater unum sumus? Quando vides aliquem alicui similem: intendat Charitas vestra, quotidiana locutio est; non sit vobis arduum quod esse advertitis usitatum: quando ergo vides aliquem alicui similem, et nosti tu cui similis sit, admirans dicis, Quomodo iste homo similis est illi homini! Hoc non diceres, nisi duo essent. Hic ille qui eum ignorat, cui tu istum similem dicis: Itane, inquit, similis est? Et tu ad eum: Quid enim, tu illum non nosti? At ille: Non novi, inquit. Jam tu, ut illum quem nescit, ei notum facias ex praesente quem cernit, respondes et dicis: Hunc vidisti, illum vidisti. Non utique quia hoc dixisti, unum esse asseverasti, et duos negasti: sed propter similitudinem tale dedisti responsum, Istum nosti et illum nosti; valde enim similis est, et nihil distat omnino. Hinc et Dominus, Si me, inquit, sciretis, et Patrem meum sciretis, non quia Pater est Filius, sed quia Patri similis Filius. Erubescat arianus. Gratias Domino quia et ipse arianus recessit ab errore sabelliano, et non est patripassianus: non dicit ipsum Patrem indutum carne venisse ad homines, ipsum esse passum, ipsum resurrexisse, et quodammodo ad se ascendisse; hoc non dicit: agnoscit mecum Patrem, Patrem esse; et Filium, Filium esse. Sed, o frater, evasisti illud naufragium, quare tendis in alterum? Pater, Pater est; Filius, Filius est: quare dicis dissimilem? quare diversum? quare aliam substantiam? Si dissimilis esset, numquid diceret discipulis suis, Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem? numquid diceret Judaeis, Si me sciretis, et Patrem meum sciretis? Unde hoc verum esset, nisi et illud verum, Ego et Pater unum sumus?
7. A little before He said, My judgement is true; for I am not alone, but I and the Father Who sent Me: as if He were saying, My judgement is therefore true because I am the Son of God, because I speak the truth, because I am the truth itself. These men, understanding carnally, said, Where is your father? Now hear, Arian: You know neither Me nor My Father; for if you knew Me, you would know My Father also. What is "if you knew Me, you would know My Father also", except "I and the Father are one"? When you see someone like someone else (let your Charity attend; it is an everyday way of speaking; let not that be hard for you which you notice to be customary): when, then, you see someone like someone else, and you know whom he is like, you say in wonder, How like that man this man is! You would not say this unless there were two. Here the one who does not know him to whom you say this one is like says: Is he so like? And you to him: What, do you not know him? And he: I do not know him, he says. Then you, to make known to him the one he does not know from the one present whom he sees, answer and say: You have seen this one, you have seen that one. Certainly, in saying this, you did not assert that there is one and deny that there are two: but because of the likeness you gave such an answer, You know this one and you know that one; for he is very like, and differs in nothing at all. Hence the Lord too says, If you knew Me, you would know My Father also, not because the Father is the Son, but because the Son is like the Father. Let the Arian blush. Thanks be to the Lord that even the Arian has withdrawn from the Sabellian error and is not a Patripassian: he does not say that the Father Himself, clothed in flesh, came to men, that He Himself suffered, that He Himself rose again, and in a manner ascended to Himself; this he does not say: he acknowledges with me that the Father is the Father, and that the Son is the Son. But, O brother, you have escaped that shipwreck; why do you head for the other? The Father is the Father; the Son is the Son: why do you call Him unlike? why diverse? why of another substance? If He were unlike, would He say to His disciples, He who has seen Me has seen the Father also? would He say to the Jews, If you knew Me, you would know My Father also? How would this be true, unless that also were true, I and the Father are one?
8. Haec verba locutus est Jesus in gazophylacio docens in templo: magna fiducia, sine timore. Non enim pateretur quod nollet, qui nec nasceretur si nollet. Denique quid sequitur? Et nemo apprehendit eum, quia nondum venerat hora ejus. Hoc item nonnulli cum audiunt, sub fato fuisse Dominum Christum credunt,
8. These words Jesus spoke in the treasury, teaching in the temple: with great confidence, without fear. For He would not suffer what He did not will, He Who would not even have been born if He had not willed. Then what follows? And no one seized Him, because His hour had not yet come. Some likewise, when they hear this, believe that the Lord Christ was subject to fate,