Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1670–1674

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus XXXVI-XLV

Tractate XXXVII

PL 35:1670
22). Jam in eisdem verbis Evangelii disputavimus, et nunc admonemus, non hoc ideo dictum, quia Pater non erit cum Filio judicante; sed quoniam bonis et malis in judicio solus Filius apparebit, in ea forma in qua passus est, et resurrexit, et ascendit in coelum. Discipulis quippe tunc conspicientibus ascendentem, vox angelica sonuit, Sic veniet, quemadmodum vidistis eum euntem in coelum (Act. I, 11): id est, in forma hominis in qua judicatus est judicabit, ut etiam illud propheticum impleatur, Videbunt in quem pupugerunt (Zach. XII, 10; Joan. XIX, 37). Cum vero euntibus justis in vitam aeternam, videbimus eum sicuti est; non erit illud judicium vivorum et mortuorum, sed praemium tantummodo vivorum.
22). We have already discussed these same words of the Gospel, and now we point out that this was not said because the Father will not be with the Son when He judges, but because in the judgement the Son alone will appear to the good and to the wicked, in the form in which He suffered, and rose again, and ascended into heaven. For while the disciples were then watching Him ascend, an angelic voice sounded: Thus will He come, just as you have seen Him going into heaven (Acts 1:11); that is, in the form of man in which He was judged He will judge, so that that prophetic word too may be fulfilled: They will see Him Whom they pierced (Zech. 12:10; John 19:37). But when the just are going into eternal life, we shall see Him as He is; that will not be the judgement of the living and the dead, but the reward of the living only.
13. Item ne moveat quod ait, In Lege vestra scriptum est quia duorum hominum testimonium verum est, et ideo quisquam existimet non fuisse illam legem Dei, quia non dictum est, In lege Dei: sciat ita dictum esse, In Lege vestra, tanquam diceret, in Lege quae vobis est data; a quo, nisi a Deo? Sicut dicimus, Panem nostrum quotidianum: et tamen dicimus, Da nobis hodie (Matth. VI, 11).
13. Likewise, let it not trouble anyone that He says, In your Law it is written that the testimony of two men is true, and let no one on that account suppose that that law was not God's, because it was not said, In the law of God: let him know that it was said thus, In your Law, as if He were saying, in the Law that was given to you; and by whom, if not by God? Just as we say, Our daily bread; and yet we say, Give us today (Matt. 6:11).
TRACTATUS XXXVII.
Tractate 37.
Ab eo quod scriptum est, Dicebant ergo, Ubi est pater tuus? usque ad id, Et nemo apprehendit eum, quia nondum venerat hora ejus. Cap. VIII, ℣. 19, 20.
From that which is written, So they said, Where is your father? as far as this, And no one seized Him, because His hour had not yet come. Chapter 8, verses 19, 20.
1. Quod in sancto Evangelio breviter dicitur, non breviter oportet exponi, ut quod auditur, intelligatur. Verba enim Domini pauca, sed magna sunt; non numero aestimanda, sed pondere: nec ideo contemnenda, quia pauca; sed ideo quaerenda, quia magna. Qui adfuistis hesterno die, audistis, ut potuimus disputavimus ex eo quod ait Dominus, Vos secundum carnem judicatis; ego non judico quemquam. Sed et si judico ego, judicium meum verum est; quia solus non sum, sed ego et qui misit me Pater. In lege vestra scriptum est quod duorum hominum testimonium verum est. Ego sum qui testimonium perhibeo de me, et testimonium perhibet de me qui misit me Pater (Joan. VIII, 15-18). Ex his verbis hesterno, ut dixi, die redditus est sermo auribus et mentibus vestris. Haec cum Dominus dixisset; illi qui audierunt, Vos secundum carnem judicatis, manifestaverunt quod audierunt. Responderunt enim Domino loquenti de Deo Patre suo, et dixerunt, Ubi est pater tuus? Patrem Christi carnaliter acceperunt, quia verba Christi secundum carnem judicaverunt. Erat autem qui loquebatur in aperto caro, in occulto Verbum: homo manifestus, Deus occultus. Videbant indumentum, et contemnebant indutum: contemnebant, quia nesciebant; nesciebant, quia non videbant; non videbant, quia caeci erant; caeci erant, quia non credebant.
1. What is said briefly in the holy Gospel ought not to be expounded briefly, so that what is heard may be understood. For the words of the Lord are few, but great; they are to be valued not by number but by weight: nor are they to be despised because they are few, but to be searched out because they are great. You who were present yesterday heard how, as we were able, we discussed what the Lord said: You judge according to the flesh; I judge no one. And yet if I do judge, My judgement is true; because I am not alone, but I and the Father Who sent Me. In your law it is written that the testimony of two men is true. I am He Who bear witness concerning Myself, and the Father Who sent Me bears witness concerning Me (John 8:15–18). On these words, as I said, a sermon was rendered yesterday to your ears and minds. When the Lord had said these things, those who heard, You judge according to the flesh, made plain what they had heard. For they answered the Lord as He spoke of God His Father, and said, Where is your father? They took the Father of Christ in a carnal sense, because they judged the words of Christ according to the flesh. Now He Who was speaking was openly flesh, hiddenly the Word: man manifest, God hidden. They saw the garment, and despised the One clothed in it: they despised Him because they did not know Him; they did not know Him because they did not see Him; they did not see Him because they were blind; they were blind because they did not believe.
2. Videamus ergo et ad haec Dominus quid responderit. Ubi est, inquiunt, pater tuus? Audivimus enim te dicere, Solus non sum, sed ego et qui misit me Pater: nos solum te videmus, patrem tuum tecum non videmus; quomodo te dicis solum non esse, sed cum patre tuo esse? aut ostende nobis tecum esse patrem
2. Let us see, then, what the Lord answered to these things too. Where, they say, is your father? For we heard you say, I am not alone, but I and the Father Who sent Me: we see you alone, we do not see your father with you; how do you say that you are not alone, but are with your father? Either show us that your father is with you
Editors' notes and page, col. 1670

Page

  • running head: TUS XXXVII. CAPUT VIII. 1670 (left part of the running head cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "22)." completing a scripture reference broken from column 1669 (evidently Joan. V, 22); Zach. XII, 10 read as 10 though the numeral looks like 40; "esse" (line In Lege vestra) and "magna", "loquebatur" read through blurred type; ℣ set for the printed versicle sign; editors' matter set: (none); full-width line not set: (none)
PL 35:1671
tuum. Et Dominus : Numquid me videtis, ut Patrem ostendam vobis? Hoc enim sequitur, hoc suis verbis ipse respondit, quorum verborum expositionem nos ante praemisimus. Videte enim quid dixerit, Neque me scitis, neque Patrem meum. Si me sciretis, forsitan et Patrem meum sciretis. Dicitis ergo, Ubi est Pater tuus? quasi jam me sciatis; quasi totum hoc sim quod videtis. Ergo quia me non nostis, ideo vobis Patrem meum non ostendo. Me quippe hominem putatis, ideo Patrem meum hominem quaeritis, quia secundum carnem judicatis. Quia vero secundum quod videtis aliud sum, et aliud secundum quod non videtis; Patrem autem meum loquor occultus occultum : prius est ut me noveritis; tunc et Patrem meum scietis.
And the Lord: Do you see Me, then, that I should show you the Father? For this is what follows; this He answered in His own words, the exposition of which words we set out beforehand. For see what He said: You know neither Me nor My Father. If you knew Me, perhaps you would know My Father too. You say, then, Where is Your Father? as though you already knew Me; as though I were the whole of what you see. Therefore, because you do not know Me, for that reason I do not show you My Father. For you think Me a man, and so you seek My Father as a man, because you judge according to the flesh. But since I am one thing according to what you see, and another according to what you do not see, and I, hidden, speak of My Father, Who is hidden, it comes first that you should know Me; then you will know My Father too.
3. Si enim me sciretis, et Patrem meum forsitan sciretis. Ille qui omnia scit, quando dicit forsitan, non dubitat, sed increpat. Attende enim quomodo increpative dicatur ipsum forsitan, quod videtur esse verbum dubitationis. Sed dubitationis verbum est quando dicitur ab homine, ideo dubitante quia nesciente : cum vero dicitur a Deo verbum dubitationis, cum Deum nihil utique lateat, illa dubitatione arguitur infidelitas, non opinatur divinitas. Homines enim de his rebus quas certas habent, aliquando increpative dubitant, id est, verbum dubitationis ponunt, cum corde non dubitent : velut si indigneris servo tuo et dicas, Contemnis me; considera, forsitan dominus tuus sum. Hinc et Apostolus ad quosdam contemptores suos loquens ait : Puto autem, et ego Spiritum Dei habeo (I Cor. VII, 40). Qui dicit, puto, dubitare videtur : sed ille increpabat, non dubitabat. Et ipse Dominus Christus alio loco increpans infidelitatem futuram generis humani : Cum venerit, inquit, Filius hominis, putas, inveniet fidem in terra (Luc. XVIII, 8)?
3. For if you knew Me, you would perhaps know My Father too. He Who knows all things, when He says perhaps, is not in doubt, but rebukes. For notice how this very perhaps, which seems to be a word of doubt, is said by way of rebuke. It is indeed a word of doubt when it is said by a man, who doubts because he does not know; but when a word of doubt is said by God, since nothing at all is hidden from God, by that doubting unbelief is reproved; it is not that the Godhead is conjecturing. For men sometimes doubt by way of rebuke about things they hold as certain, that is, they use a word of doubt while not doubting in their heart: as if you were angry with your servant and said, You despise me; consider, perhaps I am your master. Hence the Apostle too, speaking to certain people who despised him, says: But I think that I too have the Spirit of God (1 Cor. 7:40). He who says I think seems to doubt; but he was rebuking, not doubting. And the Lord Christ Himself, in another place, rebuking the future unbelief of the human race, says: When the Son of Man comes, do you think He will find faith on the earth? (Luke 18:8).
4. Jam, quantum existimo, intellexistis quomodo sit positum forsitan : ne quis verborum appensor et syllabarum examinator, veluti latine loqui sciens, reprehendat verbum quod dixit Dei Verbum; et reprehendendo Dei Verbum, non eloquens, sed mutus remaneat. Quis enim loquitur sic, quomodo loquitur Verbum quod erat in principio apud Deum? Noli verba ista considerare, et ex his verbis assuetis illud Verbum metiri velle quod Deus est. Audis enim Verbum et contemnis; audi Deum et time : In principio erat Verbum. Tu revocas ad usum sermocinationis tuae, et dicis apud te, Quid est verbum? quid magnum est verbum? sonat et transit; verberato aere aurem percutit, postea non erit. Audi adhuc, Verbum erat apud Deum : manebat, non sonando transibat. Adhuc forte contemnis : Deus erat Verbum (Joan. I, 1). Apud teipsum, o homo, cum est in corde tuo verbum, aliud est quam sonus : sed verbum quod est apud te, ut transeat ad me, sonum quasi vehiculum quaerit. Assumit ergo sonum, imponit se quodammodo in vehiculum, transcurrit aerem, venit ad me, nec recedit a te. Sonus autem ut veniret ad me, recessit a te, nec perstitit apud me. Verbum ergo quod erat in corde tuo, numquid sono praetereunte praeteriit? Quod
4. Now, as far as I judge, you have understood how perhaps is used: lest any weigher of words and examiner of syllables, as one who knows how to speak Latin, should find fault with a word which the Word of God spoke; and by finding fault with the Word of God should remain not eloquent but dumb. For who speaks in such a way as the Word speaks Which was in the beginning with God? Do not consider these words, and do not wish to measure from these familiar words that Word Which is God. For you hear Word and despise it; hear God and fear: In the beginning was the Word. You bring it back to the usage of your own talk, and you say within yourself, What is a word? What great thing is a word? It sounds and passes away; it strikes the ear when the air has been beaten, and afterwards it will not be. Hear further: The Word was with God: it abided, it did not pass away by sounding. Perhaps you still despise it: The Word was God (John 1:1). Within yourself, O man, when a word is in your heart, it is something other than sound; but the word which is within you, in order to pass over to me, seeks sound as a kind of vehicle. It takes up sound, then, sets itself in some manner into the vehicle, runs across the air, comes to me, and does not depart from you. But the sound, in order to come to me, departed from you, and did not remain with me. Did the word, then, which was in your heart, pass away when the sound passed away? What
Editors' notes and page, col. 1671

Page

  • running head: IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with "tuum." and ends mid-sentence with "Quod"; ligatures printed æ (praemisimus, quaeritis, tuae, quaerit, praetereunte praeteriit); "aere" and "aerem" read as aere/aerem though the scan's letters look like "acre"/"acrem"; "sono", "corde", "principio" and "praetereunte" in the last lines have damaged type but are legible; no editors' matter; no full-width line seen.
PL 35:1672
cogitabas dixisti; et ut ad me perveniret quod apud te latebat, syllabas sonuisti: sonus syllabarum perduxit ad aurem meam cogitationem tuam; per aurem meam descendit in cor meum cogitatio tua, sonus medius transvolavit: verbum vero illud quod assumpsit sonum, antequam sonares, erat apud te; quia sonuisti, est apud me, et non recessit a te. Hoc attende, quisquis es examinator sonorum. Verbum Dei contemnis, qui verbum hominis non comprehendis!
you were thinking, you said; and so that what lay hidden with you might reach me, you sounded syllables: the sound of the syllables carried your thought to my ear; through my ear your thought descended into my heart, the sound in between flew past: but that word which took on sound was with you before you sounded it; because you sounded it, it is with me, and it has not departed from you. Attend to this, whoever you are who weigh sounds. You despise the Word of God, you who do not comprehend the word of a man!
5. Scit ergo omnia per quem facta sunt omnia, et tamen dubitando increpat: Si me sciretis, forsitan et Patrem meum sciretis. Increpat infideles. Nam talem sententiam dixit discipulis: sed ibi non est verbum dubitationis, quia non fuit causa increpandae infidelitatis. Nam quod modo dixit Judaeis, Si me sciretis, forsitan et Patrem meum sciretis: dixit et discipulis quando eum Philippus interrogavit, imo postulavit et ait, Domine, ostende nobis Patrem, et sufficit nobis: quasi diceret, Et ipsi te jam novimus, apparuisti nobis, vidimus te, dignatus es eligere nos, secuti sumus te, mirabilia tua vidimus, verba salutis audivimus, praecepta suscepimus, promissa speramus; multum nobis conferre praesentia tua ipse dignatus es: sed tamen cum te noverimus, quia Patrem nondum novimus, inflammamur desiderio illius videndi quem nondum novimus: ac per hoc quia te novimus, sed non nobis sufficit, donec et Patrem noverimus; ostende nobis Patrem, et sufficit nobis. Et Dominus ut scirent non se nosse quod se putabant jam nosse: Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et me nescitis? Philippe, qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem (Joan. XIV, 8, 9). Numquid habet ista sententia verbum dubitationis? numquid dixit, Qui me vidit, forsitan vidit et Patrem? Quare? Quia fidelis audiebat, non fidei persecutor: ideo non erat Dominus increpator, sed doctor. Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem; et hic, Si me sciretis, et Patrem meum sciretis: tollamus verbum quo notata est infidelitas audientium, et ipsa sententia est.
5. He, then, through Whom all things were made knows all things, and yet by doubting He rebukes: If you knew Me, perhaps you would know My Father too. He rebukes the unbelieving. For He spoke such a saying to the disciples: but there there is no word of doubt, because there was no cause for rebuking unbelief. For what He has just said to the Jews, If you knew Me, perhaps you would know My Father too, He said also to the disciples when Philip questioned Him, nay rather made a demand, and said, Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us: as if he were saying, We ourselves already know Thee, Thou hast appeared to us, we have seen Thee, Thou hast deigned to choose us, we have followed Thee, we have seen Thy wonders, we have heard the words of salvation, we have received Thy precepts, we hope for Thy promises; Thou Thyself hast deigned to confer much on us by Thy presence: but yet, though we know Thee, because we do not yet know the Father, we are inflamed with the desire of seeing Him Whom we do not yet know: and therefore, because we know Thee, but it is not enough for us until we know the Father too, show us the Father, and it is enough for us. And the Lord, so that they might know that they did not know what they thought they already knew: Have I been with you so long a time, and you do not know Me? Philip, whoever has seen Me has seen the Father too (John 14:8–9). Does this saying contain a word of doubt? Did He say, Whoever has seen Me has perhaps seen the Father too? Why? Because a believer was listening, not a persecutor of the faith: therefore the Lord was not a rebuker, but a teacher. Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father too; and here, If you knew Me, you would know My Father too: let us remove the word by which the unbelief of the hearers was marked, and it is the same saying.
6. Jam hesterno die commendavimus Charitati vestrae, et diximus sententias Joannis evangelistae, quibus nobis narrat quod a Domino didicit, nec discutiendas fuisse si fieri posset, nisi haereticorum commenta compellerent. Breviter ergo hesterno die, insinuavimus Charitati vestrae, esse haereticos qui vocantur Patripassiani, vel a suo auctore Sabelliani: hi dicunt ipsum esse Patrem qui est Filius; nomina diversa, unam vero esse personam. Cum vult, Pater est, inquiunt; cum vult, Filius: tamen unus est. Item sunt alii haeretici qui vocantur Ariani. Confitentur quidem unicum Patris Filium Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, illum Patrem Filii, istum Filium Patris; eum qui Pater est non esse Filium, eum qui Filius est non esse Patrem: confitentur generationem, sed negant aequalitatem. Nos, id est, catholica fides veniens de doctrina Apostolorum, plantata in nobis, per seriem successionis accepta, sana ad posteros transmittenda, inter utrosque, id est, inter utrumque errorem tenuit veritatem. In errore Sabellianorum unus est solus, ipse est Pater qui Filius: in errore
6. Already yesterday we commended to your Charity, and we said, that the sayings of John the evangelist, in which he tells us what he learned from the Lord, ought not to have been discussed, if that were possible, were it not that the fabrications of heretics compelled it. Briefly, then, yesterday we intimated to your Charity that there are heretics who are called Patripassians, or, after their founder, Sabellians: these say that He Who is the Son is the Father Himself; that the names are different, but the person is one. When He wills, they say, He is the Father; when He wills, the Son: yet He is one. Likewise there are other heretics who are called Arians. They confess indeed the only Son of the Father, our Lord Jesus Christ, that One the Father of the Son, this One the Son of the Father; that He Who is the Father is not the Son, that He Who is the Son is not the Father: they confess the generation, but deny the equality. We, that is, the catholic faith, coming from the teaching of the Apostles, planted in us, received through the line of succession, to be handed down sound to those who come after, has held the truth between both, that is, between either error. In the error of the Sabellians He is one alone, the Father is Himself the Son: in the error
Editors' notes and page, col. 1672

Page

  • running head: EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1672
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at the left edge of the image, only "EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI" visible; column begins mid-sentence with "cogitabas" and ends mid-sentence with "in errore"; "assumpsit" slightly damaged in print but legible
PL 35:1673
Arianorum, alius est quidem Pater, alius Filius; sed ipse Filius non solum alius, sed etiam aliud est: tu in medio quid? Exclusisti sabellianum, exclude et arianum. Pater, Pater est; Filius, Filius est: alius, non aliud; quia ego et Pater, inquit, unum sumus (Joan. X, 30), sicut etiam hesterno die, quantum potui, commendavi. Cum audit, sumus, abscedat confusus sabellianus; cum audit, unum, abscedat confusus arianus: gubernet catholicus inter utrumque fidei suae navigium, quoniam cavendum est in utroque naufragium. Dic ergo tu, quod dicit Eva⟨n⟩gelium, Ego et Pater unum sumus. Non ergo diversum, quia unum; non unus, quia sumus.
of the Arians, the Father is indeed one, the Son another; but the Son Himself is not only another [person], but also another thing: you, in the middle, what [do you say]? You have shut out the Sabellian; shut out the Arian too. The Father is the Father; the Son is the Son: another, not another thing; for I and the Father, He says, are one (John 10:30), as I also set forth yesterday, as far as I was able. When he hears "are", let the Sabellian depart confounded; when he hears "one", let the Arian depart confounded: let the Catholic steer the vessel of his faith between the two, since shipwreck must be guarded against on either side. Say therefore what the Gospel says, I and the Father are one. Therefore not diverse, because one; not one person, because "are".
7. Paulo ante dixit, Judicium meum verum est; quia solus non sum, sed ego et qui misit me Pater: tanquam diceret, Ideo judicium meum est verum, quia Filius Dei sum, quia verum loquor, quia ipsa veritas ego sum. Isti carnaliter intelligentes, dixerunt, Ubi est pater tuus? Modo audi, ariane: Neque me scitis, neque Patrem meum; quia si me sciretis, et Patrem meum sciretis. Quid est, si me sciretis et Patrem, meum sciretis, nisi, ego et Pater unum sumus? Quando vides aliquem alicui similem: intendat Charitas vestra, quotidiana locutio est; non sit vobis arduum quod esse advertitis usitatum: quando ergo vides aliquem alicui similem, et nosti tu cui similis sit, admirans dicis, Quomodo iste homo similis est illi homini! Hoc non diceres, nisi duo essent. Hic ille qui eum ignorat, cui tu istum similem dicis: Itane, inquit, similis est? Et tu ad eum: Quid enim, tu illum non nosti? At ille: Non novi, inquit. Jam tu, ut illum quem nescit, ei notum facias ex praesente quem cernit, respondes et dicis: Hunc vidisti, illum vidisti. Non utique quia hoc dixisti, unum esse asseverasti, et duos negasti: sed propter similitudinem tale dedisti responsum, Istum nosti et illum nosti; valde enim similis est, et nihil distat omnino. Hinc et Dominus, Si me, inquit, sciretis, et Patrem meum sciretis, non quia Pater est Filius, sed quia Patri similis Filius. Erubescat arianus. Gratias Domino quia et ipse arianus recessit ab errore sabelliano, et non est patripassianus: non dicit ipsum Patrem indutum carne venisse ad homines, ipsum esse passum, ipsum resurrexisse, et quodammodo ad se ascendisse; hoc non dicit: agnoscit mecum Patrem, Patrem esse; et Filium, Filium esse. Sed, o frater, evasisti illud naufragium, quare tendis in alterum? Pater, Pater est; Filius, Filius est: quare dicis dissimilem? quare diversum? quare aliam substantiam? Si dissimilis esset, numquid diceret discipulis suis, Qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem? numquid diceret Judaeis, Si me sciretis, et Patrem meum sciretis? Unde hoc verum esset, nisi et illud verum, Ego et Pater unum sumus?
7. A little before He said, My judgement is true; for I am not alone, but I and the Father Who sent Me: as if He were saying, My judgement is therefore true because I am the Son of God, because I speak the truth, because I am the truth itself. These men, understanding carnally, said, Where is your father? Now hear, Arian: You know neither Me nor My Father; for if you knew Me, you would know My Father also. What is "if you knew Me, you would know My Father also", except "I and the Father are one"? When you see someone like someone else (let your Charity attend; it is an everyday way of speaking; let not that be hard for you which you notice to be customary): when, then, you see someone like someone else, and you know whom he is like, you say in wonder, How like that man this man is! You would not say this unless there were two. Here the one who does not know him to whom you say this one is like says: Is he so like? And you to him: What, do you not know him? And he: I do not know him, he says. Then you, to make known to him the one he does not know from the one present whom he sees, answer and say: You have seen this one, you have seen that one. Certainly, in saying this, you did not assert that there is one and deny that there are two: but because of the likeness you gave such an answer, You know this one and you know that one; for he is very like, and differs in nothing at all. Hence the Lord too says, If you knew Me, you would know My Father also, not because the Father is the Son, but because the Son is like the Father. Let the Arian blush. Thanks be to the Lord that even the Arian has withdrawn from the Sabellian error and is not a Patripassian: he does not say that the Father Himself, clothed in flesh, came to men, that He Himself suffered, that He Himself rose again, and in a manner ascended to Himself; this he does not say: he acknowledges with me that the Father is the Father, and that the Son is the Son. But, O brother, you have escaped that shipwreck; why do you head for the other? The Father is the Father; the Son is the Son: why do you call Him unlike? why diverse? why of another substance? If He were unlike, would He say to His disciples, He who has seen Me has seen the Father also? would He say to the Jews, If you knew Me, you would know My Father also? How would this be true, unless that also were true, I and the Father are one?
8. Haec verba locutus est Jesus in gazophylacio docens in templo: magna fiducia, sine timore. Non enim pateretur quod nollet, qui nec nasceretur si nollet. Denique quid sequitur? Et nemo apprehendit eum, quia nondum venerat hora ejus. Hoc item nonnulli cum audiunt, sub fato fuisse Dominum Christum credunt,
8. These words Jesus spoke in the treasury, teaching in the temple: with great confidence, without fear. For He would not suffer what He did not will, He Who would not even have been born if He had not willed. Then what follows? And no one seized Him, because His hour had not yet come. Some likewise, when they hear this, believe that the Lord Christ was subject to fate,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1673

Page

  • running head: 1673 TRACTATUS XXXVII. CAP (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "Eva gelium" printed with a gap in the type, set Eva⟨n⟩gelium; "Patrem, meum sciretis" comma set as printed; printer's signature "PATROL. XXXV." not set; right-hand column (1674) not set
PL 35:1674
et dicunt : Ecce Christus habebat fatum. O si cor tuum non esset fatuum, non crederes fatum! Si fatum, sicut nonnulli intellexerunt, a fando dictum est, id est a loquendo; Verbum Dei quomodo habet fatum, quando in ipso Verbo omnia sunt quae condita sunt? Non enim aliquid Deus constituit quod ante nescivit; in Verbo ipsius erat quod factum est. Mundus factus est; et factus est, et ibi erat. Quomodo et factus est, et ibi erat? Quia domus quam aedificat structor, prius in arte erat; et ibi melius erat, sine vetustate, sine ruina : tamen ut ostendat artem, fabricat domum; et processit quodammodo domus ex domo; et si domus ruat, ars manet. Ita apud Dei Verbum erant omnia quae condita sunt; quia omnia in sapientia fecit Deus (Psal. CIII, 24), et cuncta nota fecit : non enim quia fecit didicit, sed quia noverat fecit. Nobis quia facta sunt, nota sunt; illi nisi nota essent, facta non essent. Praecessit ergo Verbum. Et quid ante Verbum Dei? Nihil omnino. Nam si esset aliquid ante, non dictum esset, In principio erat Verbum; sed, In principio factum est Verbum. Denique de mundo quid ait Moyses? In principio fecit Deus coelum et terram (Gen. I, 1). Fecit quod non erat : si ergo fecit quod non erat, ante quid erat? In principio erat Verbum. Et unde coelum et terra? Omnia per ipsum facta sunt (Joan. I, 1, 3). Tu ergo ponis Christum sub fato? Ubi sunt fata? In coelo, inquis, in ordine et conversionibus siderum. Quomodo ergo fatum habet, per quem factum est coelum et sidera; cum tua voluntas, si recte sapias, transcendat et sidera? An quia nosti Christi carnem fuisse sub coelo, ideo putas et potestatem Christi subditam coelo?
and they say: See, Christ had a fate. O if your heart were not fatuous, you would not believe in fate! If fate, as some have understood, is so called from fari, that is, from speaking, how does the Word of God have a fate, when in the Word Himself are all things that have been founded? For God did not establish anything which He did not know beforehand; what was made was in His Word. The world was made; and it was made, and it was there. How was it both made, and there? Because a house which a builder builds was first in his art; and there it was better, without age, without ruin: yet to show his art, he constructs the house; and the house proceeded, in a certain manner, from the house; and if the house falls, the art remains. So with the Word of God were all things that have been founded; for God made all things in wisdom (Ps. 103:24), and He made all things known: for He did not learn because He made, but He made because He knew. To us, because they have been made, they are known; to Him, unless they had been known, they would not have been made. The Word, therefore, went before. And what was before the Word of God? Nothing at all. For if there were anything before, it would not have been said, In the beginning was the Word; but, In the beginning the Word was made. Then what does Moses say about the world? In the beginning God made heaven and earth (Gen. 1:1). He made what was not: if then He made what was not, what was there before? In the beginning was the Word. And whence heaven and earth? All things were made through Him (John 1:1, 3). Do you, then, place Christ under fate? Where are the fates? In heaven, you say, in the order and revolutions of the stars. How then does He have a fate, through Whom heaven and the stars were made, when your will, if you are rightly wise, transcends even the stars? Or, because you know that the flesh of Christ was under heaven, do you therefore think that the power of Christ too was subject to heaven?
9. Audi, stulte : Nondum venerat hora ejus, non qua cogeretur mori, sed qua dignaretur occidi. Noverat enim ipse quando deberet mori : intendit omnia quae praedicta sunt de illo, et exspectabat finiri omnia quae praedicta sunt ante ejus passionem futura; ut cum impleta essent, tunc veniret et passio, dispositionis ordine, non fatali necessitate. Denique audite, ut probetis : inter caetera quae de illo prophetata sunt, scriptum est etiam, Dederunt in escam meam fel, et in siti mea potaverunt me aceto (Psal. LXVIII, 22). Quomodo facta sint, in Evangelio novimus. Prius dederunt fel; accepit, gustavit, et despuit : postea in cruce pendens, ut omnia praedicta complerentur, ait, Sitio : acceperunt spongiam aceto plenam, in arundine ligaverunt, et admoverunt pendenti; accepit ille et ait, Perfectum est. Quid est, Perfectum est? Impleta sunt omnia quae ante passionem meam fuerant prophetata : ergo adhuc quid hic facio? Denique posteaquam dixit, Perfectum est, inclinato capite tradidit spiritum (Joan. XIX, 28-30). Numquid illi latrones juxta confixi, quando voluerant, exspiraverunt? Tenebantur vinculis carnis, quia non erant creatores carnis : clavis confixi diu cruciabantur, quia infirmitati non dominabantur. Dominus autem quando voluit, carnem in utero virginali accepit; quando voluit, ad homines processit; quamdiu voluit, inter homines vixit; quando voluit, a carne discessit : hoc est potestatis, non necessitatis. Hanc ergo horam
9. Hear, fool: His hour had not yet come, not the hour at which He would be compelled to die, but that at which He would deign to be slain. For He Himself knew when He ought to die: He considered all the things that had been foretold about Him, and He was waiting for all the things to be accomplished which had been foretold as going to happen before His passion; so that when they had been fulfilled, then the passion too would come, by the order of a disposition, not by fatal necessity. Then listen, so that you may prove it: among the other things that were prophesied about Him, it is also written, They gave gall for my food, and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink (Ps. 68:22). How these things were done we know from the Gospel. First they gave gall; He took it, tasted it, and spat it out: afterwards, hanging on the cross, so that all the things foretold might be fulfilled, He said, I thirst: they took a sponge full of vinegar, they bound it on a reed, and they brought it to Him as He hung; He took it and said, It is finished. What is, It is finished? All the things that had been prophesied before my passion have been fulfilled: why then am I still here? Then, after He said, It is finished, having bowed His head He gave up the spirit (John 19:28–30). Did those robbers crucified beside Him breathe their last when they wished? They were held by the bonds of the flesh, because they were not the creators of the flesh: fastened with nails they were tormented for a long time, because they were not masters of their weakness. But the Lord, when He wished, took flesh in the virgin's womb; when He wished, He came forth to men; for as long as He wished, He lived among men; when He wished, He departed from the flesh: this belongs to power, not to necessity. This hour, therefore,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1674

Page

  • running head: S XXXVII. CAPUT VIII. (cut off at left edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: line ends of column 1673 visible at left edge, not set; printer's signature "(Cinquante-trois.)" and "Digitized by Google" not set; "Hanc" printed with damaged H, "fel" and "despuit" with damaged letters, read as such; "Joan. I, 1, 3" final figure blurred, read as 3; "intendit" set as printed (other editions read intendebat), UNSURE whether misprint; stray accent over "quando" in "quando voluit, a carne" ignored