Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1912–1916

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus CIII-CXVI

Tractates CVII–CVIII

PL 35:1912
7. Ipsi autem Filio quomodo Pater ea verba dederit, quibus verbis homo poterit explicare? Facilior sane quaestio videtur, si secundum id quod filius est hominis, accepisse a Patre illa verba credatur. Quanquam natus ex Virgine quando et quomodo ea didicerit, quis enarrabit; quando etiam ipsam quae de Virgine facta est, generationem ejus quis enarrabit? Si vero secundum id quod est de Patre genitus Patrique coaeternus, accepisse a Patre ista verba cogitatur, nihil ibi temporis cogitetur quasi prius fuerit qui ea non habuerit, atque ut haberet quae non habebat acceperit; quoniam quidquid Deus Pater Deo Filio dedit, gignendo dedit. Ita enim dedit Filio Pater, sine quibus Filius esse non posset, sicut ei dedit ut esset. Nam quomodo aliter Verbo verba daret aliqua, in quo ineffabiliter dixit omnia? Sed jam quae sequuntur, alio sunt exspectanda sermone.
7. But how the Father gave those words to the Son Himself, with what words will a man be able to explain? The question seems easier indeed if He is believed to have received those words from the Father according to that by which He is the son of man. Yet, born of the Virgin, when and how He learned them, who will declare, since even that generation of His which was made from the Virgin, who will declare? But if He is thought to have received these words from the Father according to that by which He is begotten of the Father and co-eternal with the Father, let no time be thought of there, as though He existed earlier without having them, and afterwards received them so as to have what He did not have; for whatever God the Father gave to God the Son, He gave by begetting. For the Father so gave to the Son those things without which the Son could not be, just as He gave to Him that He should be. For how else would He give any words to the Word, in Whom He ineffably spoke all things? But what follows must now be awaited in another sermon.
TRACTATUS CVII. De eo quod dicit Jesus, Ego pro eis rogo, etc., usque ad id, Ut habeant gaudium meum impletum in semetipsis. Cap. XVII, ℣. 9-13.
Tractate 107. On that which Jesus says, I pray for them, etc., as far as this, That they may have My joy fulfilled in themselves. Chapter 17, verses 9-13.
1. Cum de his quos jam discipulos habebat, Dominus loqueretur ad Patrem, inter alia etiam dixit hoc: Ego pro eis rogo: non pro mundo rogo, sed pro his quos dedisti mihi. Mundum vult modo intelligi, qui vivunt secundum concupiscentiam mundi, et non sunt in ea sorte gratiae, ut ab illo eligantur ex mundo. Non itaque pro mundo, sed pro his quos ei Pater dedit, rogare se dicit: per hoc enim quod eos illi Pater jam dedit, factum est ut non pertineant ad cum mundum pro quo non rogat.
1. When the Lord was speaking to the Father about those whom He already had as disciples, among other things He also said this: I pray for them: I do not pray for the world, but for those whom Thou hast given Me. By the world He wishes to be understood here those who live according to the lust of the world, and are not in that lot of grace, that they should be chosen by Him out of the world. Therefore He says that He prays not for the world, but for those whom the Father has given Him: for by the very fact that the Father has already given them to Him, it has come about that they do not belong to that world for which He does not pray.
2. Deinde subjungit, Quia tui sunt. Neque enim quia Pater eos Filio dedit, amisit ipse quos dedit: cum adhuc Filius sequatur, et dicat, Et mea omnia tua sunt, et tua mea. Ubi satis apparet quomodo unigeniti Filii sint omnia quae sunt Patris; per hoc utique quod etiam ipse Deus est, et de Patre Patri est natus aequalis: non quomodo dictum est uni ex duobus filiis, majori scilicet, Tu semper mecum es, et omnia mea tua sunt (Luc. XV, 31). Illud enim dictum est de his omnibus creaturis quae infra creaturam sanctam rationalem sunt, quae utique subduntur Ecclesiae; in qua universa Ecclesia et illi duo intelliguntur filii major et minor, cum omnibus Angelis sanctis, quibus erimus aequales in regno Christi et Dei (Matth. XXII, 30): hoc autem ita dictum est, Et mea omnia tua sunt, et tua mea, ut hic sit etiam ipsa creatura rationalis, quae non nisi Deo subditur, ut ei quae infra illam sunt cuncta subdantur. Haec ergo cum sit Dei Patris, non simul esset et Filii, nisi Patri esset aequalis: de ipsa quippe agebat, cum diceret, Non pro mundo rogo, sed pro his quos dedisti mihi: quia tui sunt, et mea omnia tua sunt, et tua mea. Nec fas est ut sancti, de quibus haec locutus est, cujusquam sint, nisi ejus a quo creati et sanctificati sunt: ac per hoc et omnia quae ipsorum sunt, necesse est ut ejus sint cujus et ipsi sunt. Ergo cum et Patris et Filii sunt, aequales eos esse demonstrant, quorum aequaliter sunt. Illud autem quod ait, cum de Spiritu sancto loqueretur,
2. Then He adds, For they are Thine. For it is not the case that, because the Father gave them to the Son, He Himself lost those whom He gave: since the Son still goes on and says, And all My things are Thine, and Thine are Mine. Here it is sufficiently apparent how all things that are the Father's belong to the only-begotten Son; namely by this, that He too is Himself God, and was born of the Father equal to the Father: not in the way it was said to one of the two sons, namely the elder, You are always with me, and all my things are yours (Luke 15:31). For that was said of all those creatures which are below the holy rational creature, which are certainly subject to the Church; in which universal Church are understood both those two sons, the elder and the younger, together with all the holy Angels, to whom we shall be equal in the kingdom of Christ and of God (Matt. 22:30): but this was said in such a way, And all My things are Thine, and Thine are Mine, that here is included even the rational creature itself, which is subject to none but God, so that all things which are below it may be subject to it. Since therefore this belongs to God the Father, it would not at the same time belong to the Son also, unless He were equal to the Father: for it was of this very [creature] that He was treating when He said, I do not pray for the world, but for those whom Thou hast given Me: for they are Thine, and all My things are Thine, and Thine are Mine. Nor is it right that the saints, of whom He spoke these things, should belong to anyone except Him by Whom they were created and sanctified: and accordingly all things also that are theirs must belong to Him to Whom they themselves also belong. Since therefore they belong both to the Father and to the Son, they show those to be equal to whom they equally belong. But that which He says, when He was speaking concerning the Holy Spirit,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1912

Page

  • running head: [IN JOANNIS] EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1912 (left end cut off by the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: fragments of the left column (col. 1911) visible at the left edge, not set; tractate number and italic subject line of Tractatus CVII set as one title line; "ad cum mundum" in para. 1 is printed cum, set as printed, misprint for eum; final word "lo-" split at the column break (loqueretur)
PL 35:1913
Omnia quae habet Pater, mea sunt; propterea dixi quia de meo accipiet, et annuntiabit vobis (Joan. XVI, 15); de his dixit quae ad ipsam Patris pertinent divinitatem, in quibus illi est aequalis, omnia quae habet habendo. Neque enim Spiritus sanctus de creatura quae Patri est subdita et Filio, fuerat accepturus quod ait, de meo accipiet; sed utique de Patre de quo procedit Spiritus, de quo est natus et Filius.
All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He will receive of Mine, and will announce it to you (John 16:15); He spoke of those things which belong to the very divinity of the Father, in which He is equal to Him, having all things that He has. For the Holy Spirit was not going to receive from the creature, which is subject to the Father and the Son, what He says, He will receive of Mine; but assuredly from the Father, from Whom the Spirit proceeds, from Whom the Son also is born.
3. Et clarificatus sum, inquit, in eis. Nunc suam clarificationem tanquam facta sit dicit, cum adhuc esset futura: superius autem a Patre poscebat ut fieret. Sed utrum ipsa sit clarificatio, de qua dixerat, Et nunc clarifica me tu, Pater, apud temetipsum, claritate quam habui, priusquam mundus esset, apud te (Joan. XVII, 1, 5); utique requirendum est. Si enim apud te, quomodo in eis? An cum hoc ipsum innotescit eis, ac per ipsos omnibus qui credunt eis testibus suis? Possumus plane sic intelligere dixisse Dominum de Apostolis, quod clarificatus sit in eis: dicendo enim esse jam factum, ostendit jam fuisse praedestinatum, et certum haberi voluit quod esset futurum.
3. And I am glorified, He says, in them. Now He speaks of His glorification as though it had taken place, when it was still to come; but above He was asking of the Father that it should take place. But whether this is the glorification of which He had said, And now glorify Thou Me, Father, with Thyself, with the glory which I had, before the world was, with Thee (John 17:1, 5), must certainly be inquired into. For if it is with Thee, how is it in them? Is it when this very thing becomes known to them, and through them to all who believe them as His witnesses? We can plainly understand that the Lord said this of the Apostles, that He is glorified in them: for by saying that it was already done, He showed that it had already been predestined, and He wished that what was to come should be held as certain.
4. Et jam, inquit, non sum in mundo, et hi in mundo sunt. Si horam prorsus illam qua loquebatur attendas, utrique adhuc in mundo erant; et ipse scilicet, et illi de quibus hoc dicebat: non enim secundum provectum cordis et vitae id accipere possumus vel debemus, ut illi propterea adhuc esse di⟨c⟩antur in mundo, quod mundana adhuc sapiant; ille autem jam non esse in mundo, sapiendo divina. Positum est hic enim verbum unum, quod nos ita intelligere omnino non sinat: quia non ait, Et non sum in mundo; sed, Jam non sum in mundo: per hoc ostendens fuisse se in mundo, jam non esse. Numquid ergo fas est ut eum credamus aliquando mundana sapuisse, et ab hoc errore liberatum jam illa non sapere? Quis tam impio sensu se induerit? Restat igitur ut secundum id quod ipse etiam in mundo prius erat, in mundo se dixerit jam non esse; profecto praesentia corporali, a mundo scilicet absentiam suam jam cito futuram, illorum autem tardius, per hoc ostendens, quod se jam non hic esse, illos autem hic esse di⟨x⟩i⟨t⟩, cum et ipse hic et illi adhuc essent. Sic enim est locutus, homo congruens hominibus, ut mos loquendi sese habet humanus. An non quotidie dicimus, Jam non est hic, de aliquo quantocius abituro? Et maxime hoc de morituris solet dici. Quanquam et ipse Dominus tanquam praevidens quid lecturos movere posset adjecit, Et ego ad te venio: sic exponens quodammodo cur dixerit, Jam non sum in mundo.
4. And now, He says, I am not in the world, and these are in the world. If you attend to that very hour in which He was speaking, both were still in the world, namely both He Himself and those of whom He was saying this: for we neither can nor ought to take it according to the progress of heart and life, so that they are said to be still in the world for this reason, that they still savour worldly things, while He is said to be no longer in the world, because He savours divine things. For one word is placed here which does not at all allow us to understand it so: because He does not say, And I am not in the world, but, Now I am not in the world, showing by this that He had been in the world and now is not. Is it right, then, for us to believe that He at some time savoured worldly things, and, freed from this error, no longer savours them? Who would clothe himself in so impious a sense? It remains, therefore, that according to that in which He too had formerly been in the world, He said that He was no longer in the world; assuredly in bodily presence, showing by this that His absence from the world would now come soon, but theirs more slowly, in that He said that He was no longer here but that they were here, when both He and they were still here. For thus He spoke, a man suiting Himself to men, as the human manner of speaking goes. Do we not daily say, He is no longer here, of someone who is about to depart very soon? And this is especially wont to be said of the dying. Although the Lord Himself too, as though foreseeing what might trouble readers, added, And I come to Thee, thus explaining in a manner why He had said, Now I am not in the world.
5. Commendat ergo eos Patri, quos corporali absentia relicturus est, dicens: Pater sancte, serva eos in nomine tuo quos dedisti mihi. Nempe sicut homo Deum rogat pro discipulis suis, quos accepit a Deo. Sed attende quod sequitur: Ut sint, inquit, unum sicut et nos. Non ait, Ut nobiscum sint unum, aut, simus unum ipsi et nos, sicut unum sumus nos; sed ait, Ut sint unum sicut et nos. Ipsi utique in natura
5. He commends them, therefore, to the Father, those whom He is about to leave by His bodily absence, saying: Holy Father, keep them in Thy name, those whom Thou hast given Me. Certainly as a man He asks God for His disciples, whom He received from God. But attend to what follows: That they may be one, He says, as We also are. He does not say, That they may be one with Us, or, That they and We may be one, as We are one; but He says, That they may be one as We also are. That they, assuredly, in their own nature
Editors' notes and page, col. 1913

Page

  • running head: 1913 TRACTATUS CVII. CAPU[T ...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence with "quereretur" and ends mid-sentence at "in natura"; UNSURE: "quereretur" may be the tail of a word broken at the column break (Augustine's text has "cum de Spiritu sancto loqueretur", so possibly "lo-|quereretur", a misprint for loqueretur); previous column not seen, set as printed and English left as read; damaged type in "di⟨c⟩antur" and "di⟨x⟩i⟨t⟩" (printed "di\i'"); worn type often makes e look like c (Patcr, scrva, cst), read as e; column number in head looks like 1915 but is taken as 1913 per the request
PL 35:1914
sua s⟨i⟩nt unum, sicut et nos in nostra unum sumus. Quod procul dubio verum non diceret, nisi secundum hoc diceret, quod ejusdem naturae Deus est cujus et Pater, secundum quod alibi dixit, Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joan. X, 30): non secundum id quod etiam homo est; nam secundum hoc, Pater major me est (Id. XIV, 28), dixit. Sed quoniam una eademque persona est Deus et homo, intelligimus hominem in eo quod rogat: intelligimus autem Deum in eo quod unum sunt et ipse et ille quem rogat. Sed est adhuc in oonsequentibus locus ubi de hac re diligentius disputandum est.
may be one, just as We too are one in Ours. He would beyond doubt not say this truly, unless He said it according to this, that He is God of the same nature as the Father also is, according to what He said elsewhere, I and the Father are one (John 10:30): not according to that whereby He is also man; for according to this He said, The Father is greater than I (John 14:28). But since God and man is one and the same person, we understand the man in His asking, but we understand God in this, that He Himself and He Whom He asks are one. But there is still a place in what follows where this matter must be discussed more carefully.
6. Hic autem sequitur: Cum essem cum eis, ego servabam eos in nomine tuo. Me, inquit, veniente ad te, serva eos in nomine tuo, in quo eos quando cum eis eram, et ipse servabam. In nomine Patris servabat discipulos suos Filius homo, cum eis humana praesentia constitutus: sed etiam Pater in nomine Filii servabat quos in nomine Filii petentes exaudiebat. His quippe idem Filius dixerat: Amen, amen dico vobis, si quid petieritis Patrem in nomine meo, dabit vobis (Id. XVI, 23). Neque hoc tam carnaliter debemus accipere, velut vicissim nos servent Pater et Filius, amborum in nobis custodiendis alternante custodia, quasi succedat alius quando discesserit alius: simul enim nos custodiunt Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus, qui est unus verus et beatus Deus. Sed Scriptura nos non levat, nisi descendat ad nos: sicut Verbum caro factum descendit ut levaret, non cecidit ut jaceret. Si descendentem cognovimus, cum levante surgamus; et intelligamus, cum ita loquitur, personas eum distinguere, non separare naturas. Quando ergo servabat discipulos suos Filius praesentia corporali, non exspectabat Pater ad custodiendum succedere Filio discedenti; sed eos ambo servabant potentia spirituali: et quando ab eis abstulit Filius praesentiam corporalem, tenuit cum Patre custodiam spiritualem. Quia et custodiendos quando Filius homo accepit, custodiae paternae non eos abstulit: et cum Pater Filio custodiendos dedit, non dedit sine ipso cui dedit; sed dedit homiui Filio, non sine Deo eodem ipso utique Filio.
6. But here there follows: While I was with them, I kept them in Thy name. With Me coming to Thee, He says, keep them in Thy name, in which I Myself also kept them when I was with them. In the name of the Father the Son as man kept His disciples, being set among them by a human presence; but the Father also, in the name of the Son, kept those whom He heard when they asked in the name of the Son. For to these the same Son had said: Amen, amen I say to you, if you ask anything of the Father in My name, He will give it to you (John 16:23). Nor ought we to take this so carnally, as though the Father and the Son keep us by turns, the guarding of the two alternating in keeping us, as if the one succeeds when the other has departed: for the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, Who is the one true and blessed God, guard us together. But Scripture does not lift us up unless it comes down to us: just as the Word made flesh came down in order to lift up, and did not fall in order to lie prostrate. If we have recognized Him coming down, let us rise with Him as He lifts up; and let us understand that, when He speaks thus, He distinguishes the persons, and does not separate the natures. When, therefore, the Son was keeping His disciples by bodily presence, the Father was not waiting to succeed the Son in guarding when the Son departed; but both were keeping them by spiritual power: and when the Son took His bodily presence away from them, He held the spiritual guarding together with the Father. For when the Son as man received them to be guarded, He did not take them away from the Father's guarding: and when the Father gave them to the Son to be guarded, He did not give them without Him to Whom He gave; but He gave them to the Son as man, not without God, that is, that very same Son.
7. Sequitur ergo Filius, et dicit: Quos dedisti mihi, custodivi: et nemo ex his periit, nisi filius perditionis, ut Scriptura impleatur. Filius perditionis dictus est traditor Christi, perditioni praedestinatus, secundum Scripturam quae de illo in psalmo centesimo octavo maxime prophetatur.
7. The Son therefore goes on, and says: Those whom Thou gavest Me I have guarded: and none of them has perished except the son of perdition, that the Scripture may be fulfilled. The betrayer of Christ is called the son of perdition, predestined to perdition, according to the Scripture which is prophesied concerning him most of all in the hundred and eighth psalm.
8. Nunc autem, inquit, ad te venio; et haec loquor in mundo, ut habeant gaudium meum impletum in semetipsis. Ecce in mundo se loqui dicit, qui paulo ante dixerat, Jam non sum in mundo: quod cur dixerit, ibi exposuimus, imo ipsum id exposuisse docuimus. Ergo et quia nondum abierat, hic adhuc erat; et quia mox fuerat abiturus, hic quodammodo jam non erat. Quod sit autem hoc gaudium de quo ait, ut habeant gaudium meum impletum in semetipsis, jam superius expressum est, ubi ait, Ut sint unum sicut et nos. Hoc gaudium suum, id est, a se in eos collatum, in eis
8. But now, He says, I come to Thee; and these things I speak in the world, that they may have My joy fulfilled in themselves. See, He says that He speaks in the world, He Who a little before had said, I am no longer in the world: why He said that, we have explained there, or rather we have shown that He Himself explained it. So then, because He had not yet gone away, He was still here; and because He was soon to go away, He was in a certain manner already not here. But what this joy is of which He says, that they may have My joy fulfilled in themselves, has already been expressed above, where He says, That they may be one as we also are. This joy of His, that is, conferred by Him upon them, in them
Editors' notes and page, col. 1914

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left] TUS CVII. CAPUT XVII. 1914
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1915
dicit implendum; propter quod locutum se dixit in mundo. Haec est pax illa et beatitudo in futuro saeculo, propter quam consequendam temperanter et juste et pie vivendum est in hoc saeculo.
He says is to be fulfilled; and for this reason He said that He had spoken in the world. This is that peace and blessedness in the age to come, for the attaining of which we must live temperately and justly and piously in this age.
TRACTATUS CVIII. De eo quod ait Jesus, Ego dedi eis sermonem tuum; usque ad id, Ut sint et ipsi sanctificati in veritate. (Cap. XVII, ℣. 14-19).
Tractate 108. On what Jesus says, I have given them Thy word; as far as this, That they also may be sanctified in truth. (John 17:14–19).
1. Loquens adhuc Dominus ad Patrem, et orans pro discipulis suis, dicit: Ego dedi eis sermonem tuum, et mundus eos odio habuit. Nondum id experti fuerant passionibus suis, quae illos postea sunt secutae; sed more suo dicit ista, verbis praeteriti temporis futura praenuntians. Deinde causam subjiciens cur eos oderit mundus: Quia non sunt, inquit, de mundo, sicut et ego non sum de mundo. Hoc eis regeneratione collatum est: nam generatione de mundo erant, propter quod jam eis dixerat, Ego vos de mundo elegi (Joan. XV, 19). Donatum est ergo eis ut sicut ipse, nec ipsi essent de mundo, eos ipso liberante de mundo. Ipse autem de mundo nunquam fuit: quia etiam secundum formam servi de Spiritu sancto ipse natus est, de quo illi renati. Nam si propterea illi jam non de mundo, quia renati sunt de Spiritu sancto; propterea ille nunquam de mundo, quia natus est de Spiritu sancto.
1. The Lord, still speaking to the Father and praying for His disciples, says: I have given them Thy word, and the world has held them in hatred. They had not yet experienced this in their own sufferings, which followed them afterwards; but in His usual manner He says these things, foretelling things to come in words of the past tense. Then, adding the reason why the world hated them: Because they are not, He says, of the world, as I also am not of the world. This was conferred on them by regeneration: for by generation they were of the world, for which reason He had already said to them, I have chosen you out of the world (John 15:19). It was therefore granted to them that, like Himself, they too should not be of the world, He Himself delivering them from the world. But He was never of the world: because even according to the form of a servant He was born of the Holy Spirit, of Whom they were reborn. For if they are for this reason no longer of the world, because they have been reborn of the Holy Spirit, for this reason He was never of the world, because He was born of the Holy Spirit.
2. Non rogo, inquit, ut tollas eos de mundo, sed ut serves eos ex malo. Adhuc enim necessarium habebant, quamvis jam non essent de mundo, esse tamen in mundo. Repetit eamdem sententiam: De mundo, inquit, non sunt, sicut et ego non sum de mundo. Sanctifica eos in veritate. Sic enim servantur ex malo, quod superius oravit ut fieret. Quaeri autem potest quomodo de mundo jam non erant, si sanctificati in veritate nondum erant; aut si jam erant, cur poscat ut sint. An quia et sanctificati in eadem proficiunt sanctitate, fiuntque sanctiores; neque hoc sine adjutorio gratiae Dei, sed illo eorum sanctificante provectum, qui sanctificavit incoeptum? Unde et Apostolus dicit: Qui in vobis opus bonum coe⟨p⟩it, perficiet usque in diem Christi Jesu (Philipp. I, 6). Sanctificantur itaque in veritate haeredes Testamenti Novi, cujus veritatis umbrae fuerant sanctificationes Veteris Testamenti: et cum sanctificantur in veritate, utique sanctificantur in Christo, qui veraciter dixit, Ego sum via, et veritas, et vita (Joan. XIV, 6). Item quando ait, Veritas liberabit vos, paulo post exponens quid dixerit, Si vos, inquit, Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis (Id. VIII, 32, 36); ut ostenderet hoc se prius dixisse veritatem, quod postmodum Filium. Quid ergo aliud et hoc loco dixit, Sanctifica eos in veritate, nisi, sanctifica eos in me?
2. I do not ask, He says, that Thou take them out of the world, but that Thou keep them from evil. For it was still necessary for them, although they were no longer of the world, nevertheless to be in the world. He repeats the same statement: They are not of the world, He says, as I also am not of the world. Sanctify them in truth. For thus are they kept from evil, which He prayed above might come about. But it may be asked how they were no longer of the world, if they were not yet sanctified in truth; or, if they already were, why He asks that they may be. Is it not because those who are sanctified also make progress in the same sanctity and become holier; and this not without the help of the grace of God, but by His sanctifying their advance Who sanctified their beginning? Whence also the Apostle says: He Who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus (Phil. 1:6). Thus the heirs of the New Testament are sanctified in truth, of which truth the sanctifications of the Old Testament had been shadows: and when they are sanctified in truth, they are surely sanctified in Christ, Who truly said, I am the way, and the truth, and the life (John 14:6). Likewise, when He says, The truth will set you free, a little later, explaining what He had said, If, He says, the Son sets you free, then you will be truly free (John 8:32, 36); so as to show that what He had first called the truth He afterwards called the Son. What else, then, did He say in this place too, Sanctify them in truth, but, sanctify them in Me?
5. Denique sequitur, et hoc apertius insinuare non desinit: Sermo, inquit, tuus veritas est. Quid aliud dixit, quam, Ego veritas sum? Graecum quippe Evangelium λόγος habet, quod etiam ibi legitur, ubi dictum est, In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Et utique Verbum ipsum novimus
3. Then He continues, and does not cease to intimate this more openly: Thy word, He says, is truth. What else did He say than, I am the truth? For the Greek Gospel has λόγος, which is also read there where it is said, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word. And surely the Word Himself we know
Editors' notes and page, col. 1915

Page

  • running head: 1915 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S. (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column ends with novi- hyphenated across the column break; coe⟨p⟩it has a gap in the type where p should be; λόγος smudged but legible; the right-hand column (next column) visible at the image edge is not set; running head truncated by the image edge
  • other: the word novimus was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1916
PL 35:1916
unigenitum Dei Filium, quod caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Id. I, 1, 14). Unde et hic poni potuit, et in quibusdam codicibus positum est, Verbum tuum veritas est; sicut in quibusdam codicibus etiam ibi scriptum est In principio erat sermo. In graeco autem sine ulla varietate, et ibi et hic λόγος est. Sanctificat itaque Pater in veritate, id est, in Verbo suo, in Unigenito suo, suos haeredes ejusque cohaeredes.
to be the only-begotten Son of God, which was made flesh, and dwelt among us (John 1:1, 14). Hence here too it could have been put, and in some codices it has been put, Thy Word is truth; just as in some codices there too it is written, In the beginning was the speech. But in the Greek, without any variation, both there and here it is λόγος. So the Father sanctifies in the truth, that is, in His Word, in His Only-begotten, His own heirs and His co-heirs.
4. Sed nunc adhuc de Apostolis loquitur; nam secutus adjungit, Sicut me misisti in mundum, et ego misi eos in mundum. Quos misit, nisi Apostolos suos? Nam et ipsum nomen Apostolorum, quoniam graecum est, nihil nisi missos significat in latino. Misit ergo Deus Filium suum non in carne peccati, sed in similitudine carnis peccati (Rom. VIII, 3); et misit Filius ejus eos quos natos in carne peccati sanctificavit a labe peccati.
4. But for now He is still speaking about the Apostles; for He goes on to add, As Thou hast sent Me into the world, I too have sent them into the world. Whom did He send, if not His Apostles? For the very name of Apostles, since it is Greek, signifies in Latin nothing other than "those sent". So God sent His Son, not in the flesh of sin, but in the likeness of the flesh of sin (Rom. 8:3); and His Son sent those whom, born in the flesh of sin, He sanctified from the stain of sin.
5. Sed quoniam per hoc quod mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus factus est caput Ecclesiae, illi membra sunt ejus; ideo ait quod sequitur, Et pro eis ego sanctifico meipsum. Quid est enim, Et pro eis ego sanctifico meipsum, nisi, eos in meipso sanctifico, cum et ipsi sint ego? Quoniam de quibus hoc ait, ut dixi, membra sunt ejus, et unus est Christus caput et corpus: docente Apostolo atque dicente de semine Abrahae, Si autem vos Christi, ergo semen Abrahae estis; cum dixisset superius, Non dicit, Et seminibus tanquam in multis; sed tanq⟨u⟩am in uno, Et semini tuo, quod est Christus (Galat. III, 29, 16). Si ergo semen Abrahae, hoc est Christus, quid aliud dictum est quibus dictum est, Ergo semen Abrahae estis, nisi, ergo Christus estis? Inde est quod alio loco idem ipse apostolus ait: Nunc gaudeo in passionibus pro vobis, et adimpleo ea quae desunt pressurarum Christi, in carne mea (Coloss. I, 24). Non dixit, pressurarum mearum, sed, Christi: quia membrum erat Christi; et in persecutionibus suis, quales Christum in suo toto corpore pati oportebat, etiam ipse pressuras ejus pro sua portione adimplebat. Quod ut etiam hoc loco certum sit, attende sequentia. Cum enim dixisset, Et pro eis ego sanctifico meipsum, ut intelligeremus hoc eum dixisse, quod eos sanctificaret in se, mox addidit, Ut sint et ipsi sanctificati in veritate. Quod quid est aliud quam, in me, secundum id quod veritas est Verbum illud in principio Deus? In quo et ipse filius hominis sanctificatus est ab initio creationis suae, quando Verbum factum est caro; quia una persona facta est Verbum et homo. Tunc ergo sanctificavit se in se, hoc est, hominem se in Verbo se; quia unus Christus Verbum et homo, sanctificans hominem in Verbo. Propter sua vero membra, Et pro eis, inquit, ego, id est, quod prosit etiam ipsis, quia et ipsi sunt ego; sicut mihi profuit in me, quia homo sum sine ipsis: Et ego sanctifico meipsum, hoc est, ipsos in me tanquam meipsum sanctifico ego, quoniam in me etiam ipsi sunt ego. Ut sint et ipsi sanctificati in veritate. Quid est et ipsi, nisi, quemadmodum ego; in veritate, quod ipse sum ego? Deinde jam non solum de Apostolis, sed etiam de
5. But since, through the fact that the mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus, has been made head of the Church, they are His members, He therefore says what follows, And for them I sanctify Myself. For what is, And for them I sanctify Myself, if not, I sanctify them in Myself, since they too are I? For those of whom He says this are, as I have said, His members, and the head and the body are one Christ: as the Apostle teaches and says concerning the seed of Abraham, But if you are Christ's, then you are the seed of Abraham; after he had said above, He does not say, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to your seed, which is Christ (Gal. 3:29, 16). If then the seed of Abraham is Christ, what else was said to those to whom it was said, Then you are the seed of Abraham, if not, then you are Christ? Hence it is that in another place the same apostle says: Now I rejoice in sufferings for you, and fill up those things which are lacking of the afflictions of Christ, in my flesh (Col. 1:24). He did not say, of my afflictions, but, of Christ: because he was a member of Christ; and in his persecutions, such as it behoved Christ to suffer in His whole body, he too was filling up His afflictions for his own share. That this may be certain in this place too, attend to what follows. For when He had said, And for them I sanctify Myself, so that we might understand that He said this because He was sanctifying them in Himself, He at once added, That they too may be sanctified in the truth. And what is this other than, in Me, according as the truth is that Word, God in the beginning? In Whom the Son of man Himself too was sanctified from the beginning of His creation, when the Word was made flesh; because the Word and man were made one person. Then, therefore, He sanctified Himself in Himself, that is, Himself the man in Himself the Word; because the Word and man is one Christ, sanctifying the man in the Word. But on account of His members, And for them, He says, I, that is, so that it may profit them too, because they too are I; just as it profited Me in Myself, because I am man without them: And I sanctify Myself, that is, them in Me as Myself I sanctify, since in Me they too are I. That they too may be sanctified in the truth. What is they too, if not, just as I; in the truth, which I Myself am? Then, now not only about the Apostles, but also about
Editors' notes and page, col. 1916

Page

  • running head: VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1916 (cut off at left edge of image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with the fragment "mus" (printed type damaged, looks like "nms"), the rest of "novi-" at the foot of col. 1915; "poni" printed damaged, reads like "pom", UNSURE; Greek printed indistinctly, read as λόγος; "tanq⟨u⟩am" in the Galatians quotation has a damaged letter; "Deinde" in the last line faintly printed; stray dot after "adimpleo" not set; English of the first fragment supplied in brackets