Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1950–1954

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus CXVII-CXXIII

Tractates CXIX–CXX

PL 35:1950
exceditur; et significat supernum finem, quo cuncta opera referuntur; quoniam cuncta quae latitudine ac longitudine bene ac perseveranter fiunt, propter altitudinem divinorum facienda sunt praemiorum: profunda est in ea parte qua in terra figitur; ibi quippe et occulta est, nec videri potest, sed cuncta ejus apparentia et eminentia inde consurgunt; sicut bona nostra de profunditate gratiae Dei, quae comprehendi ac dijudicari non potest, universa procedunt. Sed etsi crux Christi hoc solum significet quod ait Apostolus, Qui autem Jesu Christi sunt, carnem suam crucifixerunt cum passionibus et concupiscentiis (Galat. V, 24), quam magnum bonum est? Nec tamen facit hoc, nisi concupiscens adversus carnem spiritus bonus, cum illam crucem Christi fecerit inimicus, id est spiritus malus. Postremo quid est, quod omnes noverunt, Signum Christi, nisi crux Christi? Quod signum nisi adhibeatur sive frontibus credentium, sive ipsi aquae ex qua regenerantur, sive oleo quo chrismate unguntur, sive sacrificio quo aluntur, nihil eorum rite perficitur. Quomodo ergo per id quod mali faciunt, nihil boni significatur; quando per crucem Christi, quam fecerunt mali, in celebratione Sacramentorum ejus bonum nobis omne signatur? Sed haec hactenus: quae autem sequuntur, alias, ut Deus opitulabitur, disserendo videbimus.
is exceeded; and it signifies the supernal end to which all works are referred; since all things that are done well and perseveringly in breadth and length are to be done for the sake of the height of divine rewards: it is deep in that part by which it is fixed in the earth; for there it is hidden and cannot be seen, but all its visible and prominent parts rise up from there; just as all our good things proceed from the depth of the grace of God, which cannot be comprehended or judged. But even if the cross of Christ signified only what the Apostle says, But those who are Jesus Christ's have crucified their flesh with its passions and lusts (Gal. 5:24), how great a good is it? Yet nothing does this except the good spirit lusting against the flesh, whereas it was the enemy, that is, the evil spirit, who made that cross of Christ. Finally, what is the sign of Christ, which all know, but the cross of Christ? Unless this sign is applied, whether to the foreheads of believers, or to the very water from which they are regenerated, or to the oil with which they are anointed as chrism, or to the sacrifice by which they are nourished, none of these is duly accomplished. How then is nothing good signified by what the wicked do, when through the cross of Christ, which the wicked made, every good is sealed for us in the celebration of His sacraments? But enough of this for now: what follows we shall see at another time by discussing it, as God shall help us.
TRACTATUS CXIX.
Tractate 119.
Ab eo quod sequitur, Et milites quidem haec fecerunt; usque ad id, Et inclinato capite tradidit spiritum. Cap. XIX, ℣. 24-30.
From what follows, And the soldiers indeed did these things; up to this, And having bowed His head He gave up His spirit. Chap. 19, vv. 24-30.
1. Crucifixo Domino, posteaquam divisio vestimentorum ejus etiam sorte missa completa est, quae deinde narret Joannes evangelista videamus. « Et milites quidem, » inquit, « haec fecerunt. Stabant autem juxta crucem Jesu, mater ejus, et soror matris ejus Maria Cleophae, et Maria Magdalene. Cum vidisset ergo Jesus matrem et discipulum stantem quem diligebat, dicit matri suae, Mulier, ecce filius tuus: deinde dicit discipulo, Ecce mater tua. Et ex illa hora accepit eam discipulus in sua. » Haec nimirum est illa hora de qua Jesus aquam conversurus in vinum, dixerat matri, Quid mihi et tibi est, mulier? nondum venit hora mea (Joan. II, 4). Hanc itaque horam praedixerat quae tunc nondum venerat, in qua deberet agnoscere moriturus, de qua fuerat mortaliter natus. Tunc ergo divina facturus, non divinitatis, sed infirmitatis matrem velut incognitam repellebat: nunc autem humana jam patiens, ex qua fuerat factus homo, affectu commendabat humano. Tunc enim qui Mariam creaverat, innotescebat virtute: nunc vero quod Maria pepererat, pendebat in cruce.
1. The Lord having been crucified, after the division of His garments, even by the casting of a lot, had been completed, let us see what John the evangelist narrates next. 'And the soldiers indeed,' he says, 'did these things. Now there stood beside the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother's sister Mary of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. When therefore Jesus had seen His mother and the disciple standing whom He loved, He says to His mother, Woman, behold your son: then He says to the disciple, Behold your mother. And from that hour the disciple took her into his own.' This, surely, is that hour of which Jesus, when about to turn water into wine, had said to His mother, What is there to me and to you, woman? My hour has not yet come (John 2:4). This hour, then, which at that time had not yet come, He had foretold, in which, being about to die, He was to acknowledge her of whom He had been born mortal. Then, therefore, being about to do divine things, He repelled as though unknown the mother not of His divinity but of His weakness: but now, already suffering human things, He commended with human affection her of whom He had been made man. For then He who had created Mary was making Himself known by power: but now that which Mary had borne was hanging on the cross.
2. Moralis igitur insinuatur locus. Facit quod faciendum admonet, et exemplo suo suos instruxit praeceptor bonus, ut a filiis piis impendatur cura parentibus: tanquam lignum illud ubi erant fixa membra morientis, etiam cathedra fuerit magistri docentis. Ex hac sana doctrina didicerat Paulus apostolus
2. A moral lesson, therefore, is conveyed. The good Teacher does what He admonishes to be done, and by His own example He instructed His own, that care should be bestowed by dutiful children on their parents: as though that wood on which the limbs of the dying One were fixed were also the chair of the Master teaching. From this sound doctrine the apostle Paul had learned
Editors' notes and page, col. 1950

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: pendebat in cruce› · call in col 1950

Vid. supra, Tract. 8.

See above, Tractate 8.

(printed under page 323)

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left] ...TUS CXIX CAPUT XIX. 1950
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1951
quod docebat, quando dicebat: Si quis autem suis, et maxime domesticis non providet, fidem negavit, et est infideli deterior (I Tim. V, 8). Quid autem tam cuique domesticum quam parentes filiis, aut parentibus filii? Hujus itaque saluberrimi praecepti ipse magister sanctorum de seipso constituebat exemplum, quando non ut famulae Deus quam creaverat et regebat, sed ut matri homo de qua creatus fuerat et quam relinquebat, alterum pro se quodammodo filium providebat. Nam cur hoc fecerit, quod sequitur indicat: ait enim Evangelista, Et ex illa hora accepit eam discipulus in sua, de seipso dicens. Sic quippe commemorare se solet, quod eum diligebat Jesus: qui utique omnes, sed ipsum prae caeteris et familiarius diligebat, ita ut in convivio super pectus suum discumbere faceret (Joan. XIII, 23); credo ut istius Evangelii, quod per eum fuerat praedicaturus, divinam excellentiam hoc modo altius commendaret.
what he taught when he said: But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever (1 Tim. 5:8). And what is so much of one's own household as parents to children, or children to parents? Of this most wholesome precept, then, the Master of the saints Himself set an example from His own person, when, not as God to a handmaid whom He had created and was ruling, but as a man to the mother of whom He had been created and whom He was leaving, He provided in some manner another son in His own place. For why He did this, what follows shows: for the Evangelist says, And from that hour the disciple took her into his own, speaking of himself. For so he is accustomed to mention himself, as the one whom Jesus loved: Who indeed loved all, but loved him beyond the rest and more intimately, so much so that He made him recline upon His breast at the supper (John 13:23); I believe in order that He might in this way commend more highly the divine excellence of this Gospel, which He was to preach through him.
3. Sed in quae sua Joannes matrem Domini accepit? Neque enim non ex eis erat qui dixerunt ei, Ecce nos dimisimus omnia, et secuti sumus te. Sed ibi quoque audierat, Quicumque ista dimiserit propter me, accipiet in hoc saeculo centies tantum (Matth. XIX, 27, 29). Habebat ergo ille discipulus centupliciter plura quam dimiserat, in quae susciperet ejus matrem qui illa donaverat. Sed in ea societate beatus Joannes receperat centuplum, ubi nemo dicebat aliquid suum, sed erant illis omnia communia; sicut in Apostolorum Actibus scriptum est. Sic enim Apostoli erant, quasi nihil habentes, et omnia possidentes (II Cor. VI, 10). Quomodo ergo matrem magistri et Domini sui discipulus et famulus accepit in sua, ubi aliquid suum nemo dicebat? An quia paulo post in eodem libro legitur, Quotquot enim possessores praediorum vel domorum erant, vendentes afferebant pretia eorum, et ponebant ad pedes Apostolorum: distribuebatur autem unicuique prout opus erat (Act. IV, 32-35), intelligendum est sic distributum fuisse huic discipulo quod opus erat, ut illic etiam beatae Mariae tanquam matris ejus portio poneretur; magisque sic debemus accipere quod dictum est, Ex illa hora suscepit eam discipulus in sua, ut ad ejus curam quidquid ei esset necessarium pertineret? Suscepit ergo eam in sua, non praedia, quae nulla propria possidebat; sed officia, quae propria dispensatione exsequenda curabat.
3. But into what things of his own did John take the mother of the Lord? For he too was one of those who said to Him, Behold, we have left all things and have followed Thee. But there he had also heard, Whoever has left these things for My sake shall receive in this world a hundred times as much (Matt. 19:27, 29). That disciple, then, had a hundredfold more than he had left, into which he might receive the mother of Him Who had given him those things. But blessed John had received the hundredfold in that fellowship where no one called anything his own, but they had all things in common; as is written in the Acts of the Apostles. For thus were the Apostles, as having nothing, and possessing all things (2 Cor. 6:10). How then did the disciple and servant take the mother of his Master and Lord into his own, where no one called anything his own? Or, since a little later in the same book it is read, For as many as were owners of lands or houses, selling them, brought the prices of them and laid them at the feet of the Apostles: and distribution was made to each according as there was need (Acts 4:32–35), is it to be understood that what was needed was so distributed to this disciple that there was placed there also the portion of blessed Mary as of his mother; and ought we rather so to take what was said, From that hour the disciple received her into his own, that whatever was necessary for her should belong to his care? He received her, then, into his own, not lands, for he possessed none of his own; but services, which he took care to carry out by his own stewardship.
4. Deinde subjungit: « Postea sciens Jesus quia omnia consummata sunt, ut consummaretur Scriptura, dicit: Sitio. Vas ergo positum erat aceto plenum; illi autem spongiam plenam aceto hyssopo circumponentes, obtulerunt ori ejus. Cum ergo accepisset Jesus acetum, dixit: Consummatum est. Et inclinato capite, tradidit spiritum. » Quis potest quae facit, ita disponere, quomodo disposuit homo iste quae passus est? Sed homo mediator Dei et hominum; homo de quo praedictum legitur, Et homo est, et quis agnoscet eum? quoniam homines per quos haec fiebant, non agnoscebant hominem Deum. Homo namque apparebat qui Deus latebat; patiebatur haec omnia qui apparebat, et idem ipse disponebat haec omnia qui latebat.
4. Then he adds: « Afterwards Jesus, knowing that all things were accomplished, that the Scripture might be fulfilled, says: I thirst. Now a vessel had been set there full of vinegar; and they, putting a sponge full of vinegar around hyssop, offered it to His mouth. When therefore Jesus had received the vinegar, He said: It is finished. And bowing His head, He gave up the spirit. » Who can so arrange the things he does as this man arranged the things He suffered? But this is the man who is mediator between God and men; the man of whom it is read as foretold, And He is a man, and who shall know Him? since the men through whom these things were being done did not recognize the man as God. For the man was visible Who as God was hidden; He Who was visible suffered all these things, and the very same Who was hidden arranged all these things.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1951

Page

  • running head: 1951 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S (cut off at the image's right edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins mid-sentence (quod docebat); in "29). Habebat" a stray ink mark touches the H, word read as Habebat; no reference printed after the quotation "Et homo est, et quis agnoscet eum"; right column (1952 side) not set
PL 35:1952
Vidit ergo quia consummata sunt omnia quae oportebat ut fierent antequam acciperet acetum et traderet spiritum; atque ut hoc etiam consummaretur quod Scriptura praedixerat, Et in siti mea potaverunt me aceto (Psal. LXVIII, 22), Sitio, inquit: tanquam diceret, Hoc minus fecistis, date quod estis. Judaei quippe ipsi erant acetum, degenerantes a vino Patriarcharum et Prophetarum; et tanquam de pleno vase, de iniquitate mundi hujus impleti, cor habentes velut spongiam, cavernosis quodammodo atque tortuosis latibulis fraudulentum. Hyssopum autem cui circumposuerunt spongiam aceto plenam, quoniam herba est humilis, et pectus purgat, ipsius Christi humilitatem congruenter accipimus: quam circumdederunt, et se circumvenisse putaverunt. Unde est illud in psalmo, Asperges me hyssopo, et mundabor (Psal. L, 9). Christi namque humilitate mundamur; quia nisi humiliasset semetipsum, factus obediens usque ad mortem crucis (Philipp. II, 8), non utique sanguis ejus in peccatorum remissionem, hoc est, in nostram mundationem fuisset effusus.
He saw, therefore, that all the things had been accomplished which had to be done before He received the vinegar and gave up the spirit; and so that this too might be accomplished which Scripture had foretold, And in My thirst they gave Me vinegar to drink (Ps. 68:22), He says, I thirst: as if He were saying, This you have left undone; give what you are. For the Jews themselves were vinegar, degenerating from the wine of the Patriarchs and Prophets; and, filled as from a full vessel with the iniquity of this world, they had a heart like a sponge, deceitful with hollow, as it were, and winding hiding places. But the hyssop, around which they put the sponge full of vinegar, since it is a lowly herb and purges the breast, we fittingly take to be the humility of Christ Himself: this they surrounded, and thought that they had circumvented Him. Hence is that saying in the psalm, Thou shalt sprinkle me with hyssop, and I shall be cleansed (Ps. 50:9). For we are cleansed by the humility of Christ; because unless He had humbled Himself, becoming obedient even unto the death of the cross (Phil. 2:8), His blood would certainly not have been poured out for the remission of sins, that is, for our cleansing.
5. Nec moveat quomodo spongia ori ejus potuerit admoveri, qui in cruce fuerat exaltatus a terra. Sicut enim apud alios evangelistas legitur, quod hic praetermisit, in arundine est factum (Matth. XXVII, 48, et Marc. XV, 36), ut in spongia talis potus ad crucis sublimia levaretur. Per arundinem vero Scriptura significabatur, quae implebatur hoc facto. Sicut enim lingua dicitur vel graeca vel latina, vel alia quaelibet sonum significans, qui lingua promitur; sic arundo dici potest littera, quae arundine scribitur. Sed sonos significantes vocis humanae usitatissime dicimus linguas: Scripturam vero arundinem dici, quo minus est usitatum, eo magis est mystice figuratum. Faciebat ista populus impius, patiebatur ista misericors Christus. Qui faciebat, quid faceret nesciebat: qui patiebatur autem, non solum quid fieret et cur fieret sciebat, verum etiam de male facientibus bene ipse faciebat.
5. Nor let anyone be troubled as to how the sponge could have been brought to His mouth, since He had been lifted up from the earth on the cross. For as is read in the other evangelists, something which this one passed over, it was done with a reed (Matt. 27:48, and Mark 15:36), so that in the sponge such a drink might be raised to the heights of the cross. But by the reed was signified the Scripture, which was being fulfilled by this deed. For just as a tongue is said to be either Greek or Latin, or any other that signifies sound, which is uttered by the tongue; so the letter, which is written with a reed, can be called a reed. But it is most usual for us to call the significant sounds of the human voice tongues; whereas for Scripture to be called a reed, the less usual it is, the more mystically it is figured. An impious people did these things; the merciful Christ suffered these things. He who was doing them did not know what he was doing; but He who was suffering not only knew what was being done and why it was being done, but even Himself did good out of those who did evil.
6. Cum ergo accepisset Jesus acetum, dixit: Consummatum est. Quid, nisi quod prophetia tanto ante praedixerat? Deinde quia nihil remanserat quod antequam moreretur fieri adhuc oporteret, tanquam ille qui potestatem habebat ponendi animam suam, et iterum sumendi eam (Joan. X, 18), peractis omnibus quae ut peragerentur exspectabat, Inclinato capite tradidit spiritum. Quis ita dormit quando voluerit, sicut Jesus mortuus est quando voluit? Quis ita vestem ponit quando voluerit, sicut se carne exuit quando voluit? Quis ita cum voluerit abit, quomodo cum voluit obiit? Quanta speranda vel timenda potestas est judicantis, si apparuit tanta morientis?
6. When therefore Jesus had received the vinegar, He said: It is accomplished. What, except what prophecy had foretold so long before? Then, because nothing remained which still had to be done before He died, as He Who had power to lay down His life and to take it up again (John 10:18), all the things having been carried through which He was waiting to have carried through, Having bowed His head He gave up the spirit. Who sleeps when he wishes in the way that Jesus died when He wished? Who puts off his garment when he wishes in the way that He put off the flesh when He wished? Who departs when he wishes in the way that He passed away when He wished? How great a power of the One judging is to be hoped for or feared, if so great a power of the One dying has appeared?
TRACTATUS CXX.
Tractate 120.
Ab eo quod sequitur, Judaei ergo, quoniam parasceve erat, etc.; usque ad id, Nondum enim sciebant Scripturam, quia oportet eum a mortuis resurgere. Cap. XIX, ℣. 31-42, et cap. XX, ℣. 1-9.
From what follows, The Jews therefore, since it was the Preparation, etc.; as far as this, For they did not yet know the Scripture, that He must rise from the dead. Chapter 19, verses 31-42, and chapter 20, verses 1-9.
1. Posteaquam Dominus Jesus, peractis omnibus quae ante suam mortem peragi oportere praesciebat,
1. After the Lord Jesus, all the things having been carried through which He foreknew had to be carried through before His death,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1952

Page

  • running head: VANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI (cut off at the left edge; column number 1952)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: "antequam" in line 2 looks damaged in the type (reads like "anteouam") and is set as antequam; the versicle sign in the Tractate 120 heading is set as ℣; the column ends mid-sentence with "praesciebat,"; the left column visible in the images belongs to column 1951 and is not set
PL 35:1953
quando voluit tradidit spiritum, quae deinde secuta sunt, Evangelista narrante videamus. « Judaei ergo, inquit, quoniam parasceve erat, ut non remanerent in cruce corpora sabbato (erat enim magnus dies ille sabbati), rogaverunt Pilatum ut frangerentur eorum crura, et tollerentur. » Non crura tollerentur, sed hi quibus ideo frangebantur ut morerentur, et auferrentur ex ligno; ne pendentes in crucibus magnum diem festum sui diurni cruciatus horrore foedarent
when He willed He gave up the spirit, let us see what followed then, as the Evangelist narrates it. 'The Jews therefore,' he says, 'since it was the Preparation, so that the bodies might not remain on the cross on the sabbath (for that day of the sabbath was a great one), asked Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.' Not that the legs might be taken away, but those whose legs were broken for this reason, that they might die and be removed from the wood; lest, hanging on crosses, they should defile the great feast day with the horror of their torment by day
2. « Venerunt ergo milites, et primi quidem fregerunt crura, et alterius qui crucifixus est cum eo. Ad Jesum autem cum venissent, ut viderunt eum jam mortuum, non fregerunt ejus crura: sed unus militum lancea latus ejus aperuit, et continuo exivit sanguis et aqua. » Vigilanti verbo Evangelista usus est, ut non diceret, Latus ejus percussit, aut vulneravit, aut quid aliud; sed, aperuit: ut illic quodammodo vitae ostium panderetur, unde Sacramenta Ecclesiae manaverunt, sine quibus ad vitam quae vera vita est, non intratur. Ille sanguis in remissionem fusus est peccatorum: aqua illa salutare temperat poculum; haec et lavacrum praestat, et potum. Hoc praenuntiabat quod Noe in latere arcae ostium facere jussus est (Gen. VI, 16), qua intrarent animalia quae non erant diluvio peritura, quibus praefigurabatur Ecclesia. Propter hoc prima mulier facta est de latere viri dormientis (Id. II, 22), et appellata est vita materque vivorum (Id. III, 20). Magnum quippe significavit bonum, ante magnum praevaricationis malum Hic secundus Adam inclinato capite in cruce dormivit, ut inde formaretur ei conjux, quod de latere dormientis effluxit. O mors unde mortui reviviscunt! Quid isto sanguine mundius? quid vulnere isto salubrius?
2. 'So the soldiers came, and broke the legs of the first, and of the other who was crucified with him. But when they had come to Jesus, as they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs: but one of the soldiers opened His side with a lance, and at once there came out blood and water.' The Evangelist used a watchful word, so as not to say, He struck His side, or wounded it, or anything else; but, opened: so that there, in a certain manner, the door of life might be thrown open, from which the Sacraments of the Church flowed forth, without which there is no entering into the life which is true life. That blood was shed for the remission of sins: that water mixes the saving cup; this furnishes both washing and drink. This was foretold by the fact that Noah was commanded to make a door in the side of the ark (Gen. 6:16), through which the animals which were not to perish in the flood might enter, by which the Church was prefigured. For this reason the first woman was made from the side of the man as he slept (Gen. 2:22), and was called life and the mother of the living (Gen. 3:20). For it signified a great good, before the great evil of the transgression. Here the second Adam, His head bowed, slept on the cross, so that a spouse might be formed for Him from that which flowed out of the side of the sleeper. O death, whence the dead come back to life! What is cleaner than this blood? what is more healing than this wound?
3. Et qui vidit, inquit, testimonium perhibuit, et verum est testimonium ejus: et ille scit quia vera dicit, ut et vos credatis. Non dixit, ut et vos sciatis; sed ut credatis: scit enim qui vidit, cujus credat testimonio qui non vidit. Magis autem ad fidem credere pertinet quam videre. Nam quid est aliud credere, quam fidem accommodare? Facta sunt enim haec, inquit, ut Scriptura impleretur. Os non comminuetis ex eo. Et iterum alia Scriptura dicit, Videbunt in quem confixerunt. Duo testimonia de Scripturis reddidit singulis rebus quas factas fuisse narravit. Nam quia dixerat, Ad Jesum autem cum venissent, ut viderunt eum jam mortuum, non fregerunt ejus crura, ad hoc pertinet testimonium, Os non comminuetis ex eo: quod praeceptum est eis qui celebrare Pascha jussi sunt ovis immolatione in veteri Lege, quae Dominicae passionis umbra praecesserat. Unde Pascha nostrum immolatus est Christus (I Cor. V, 7): de quo et Isaias propheta praedixerat, Sicut ovis ad immolandum ductus est (Isai. LIII, 7). Item quia subjunxerat dicens, Sed unus militum lancea latus ejus aperuit; ad hoc pertinet alterum testimonium,
3. And he who saw, he says, has borne witness, and his witness is true: and he knows that he says true things, so that you too may believe. He did not say, so that you too may know; but so that you may believe: for he who saw knows, he whose witness he who did not see believes. But believing belongs to faith more than seeing does. For what else is believing than lending trust? For these things were done, he says, so that the Scripture might be fulfilled. You shall not break a bone of Him. And again another Scripture says, They shall look on Him Whom they pierced. He has supplied two testimonies from the Scriptures, one for each of the things which he narrated as having been done. For since he had said, But when they had come to Jesus, as they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs, to this pertains the testimony, You shall not break a bone of Him: which was commanded to those who were ordered to celebrate the Passover by the sacrifice of a sheep in the old Law, which had gone before as a shadow of the Lord's passion. Hence, Christ our Passover has been sacrificed (1 Cor. 5:7): of Whom the prophet Isaiah also had foretold, As a sheep He was led to be sacrificed (Isa. 53:7). Likewise, since he had added, saying, But one of the soldiers opened His side with a lance; to this pertains the other testimony,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1953

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: diurni› · call in col 1953

Lov., diuturni. Alii codices, diurni.

The Louvain edition reads diuturni ("long-lasting"). Other manuscripts read diurni ("daily").

(printed under page 325)

(2) ‹anchor: prævaricationis malum› · call in col 1953

In tribus Mss., et apud Alcuinum, post hæc verba, ante magnum prævaricationis malum, additur, in habitu jacentis et dormientis.

In three manuscripts, and in Alcuin, after the words ante magnum prævaricationis malum ("before the great evil of the transgression") is added in habitu jacentis et dormientis ("in the posture of one lying down and sleeping").

(printed under page 325)

Page

  • running head: 1955 TRACTATUS CXX. CAPU[T] (cut off at the right edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the word testimonium, was split at the column break and stands whole here (joined on receipt); check that the English reads whole across the break into col 1954
  • other (Q1a): the English now ends with "testimony," whole here; col 1954's English still opens with the bracketed tail "[testi]mony," which should be dropped there (fix in col 1954, not written by Q1a)
PL 35:1954
Videbunt in quem confixerunt: ubi promissus est Christus, in ea qua crucifixus est carne venturus.
They shall look on Him Whom they pierced: where Christ is promised as one who would come in that flesh in which He was crucified.
4. « Post haec autem rogavit Pilatum Joseph ab Arimathia (eo quod esset discipulus Jesu, occultus autem propter metum Judaeorum), ut tolleret corpus Jesu: et permisit Pilatus. Venit ergo, et tulit corpus Jesu. Venit autem Nicodemus, qui venerat ad Jesum nocte primum, ferens mixturam myrrhae et aloes quasi libras centum. » Non ita distinguendum est, ut dicamus, primum ferens mixturam myrrhae; sed ut quod dictum est, primum, ad superiorem sensum pertineat. Venerat enim Nicodemus ad Jesum nocte primum, quod idem Joannes narravit in prioribus Evangelii sui partibus (Joan. III, 1, 2). Hic ergo intelligendum est ad Jesum, non tunc solum, sed tunc primum venisse Nicodemum; ventitasse autem postea ut fieret audiendo discipulus: quod certe modo in revelatione corporis beatissimi Stephani fere omnibus gentibus declaratur. Acceperunt ergo corpus Jesu, et ligaverunt illud linteis cum aromatibus, sicut mos est Judaeis sepelire. Non mihi videtur Evangelista frustra dicere voluisse, sicut mos est Judaeis sepelire: ita quippe, nisi fallor, admonuit in hujusmodi officiis quae mortuis exhibentur, morem cujusque gentis esse servandum.
4. « And after this Joseph of Arimathea asked Pilate (because he was a disciple of Jesus, but a secret one for fear of the Jews) that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate permitted it. He came therefore, and took away the body of Jesus. And Nicodemus also came, he who had come to Jesus by night at first, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds. » It is not to be punctuated so that we say, at first bringing a mixture of myrrh; but so that what was said, at first, belongs to the preceding clause. For Nicodemus had come to Jesus by night at first, as the same John related in the earlier parts of his Gospel (John 3:1–2). Here, then, it is to be understood that Nicodemus came to Jesus not only then, but then for the first time; and that he came often afterwards, so that by listening he might become a disciple: which indeed has just now been made known to almost all nations in the revelation of the body of the most blessed Stephen. They took therefore the body of Jesus, and bound it in linen cloths with the spices, as the custom of the Jews is to bury. The Evangelist does not seem to me to have meant to say for nothing, as the custom of the Jews is to bury: for thus, unless I am mistaken, he gave warning that in duties of this kind which are rendered to the dead the custom of each nation is to be kept.
5. Erat autem in loco ubi crucifixus est, hortus, et in horto monumentum novum, in quo nondum quisquam positus erat. Sicut in Mariae virginis utero nemo ante illum, nemo post illum conceptus est; ita in hoc monumento nemo ante illum, nemo post illum sepultus est. « Ibi ergo propter parasceven Judaeorum, quia juxta erat monumentum, posuerunt Jesum. » Acceleratam vult intelligi sepulturam, ne advesperasceret; quando jam propter parasceven, quam coenam puram Judaei latine usitatius apud nos vocant, facere tale aliquid non licebat.
5. Now in the place where He was crucified there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb, in which no one had yet been laid. Just as in the womb of the Virgin Mary no one before Him and no one after Him was conceived, so in this tomb no one before Him and no one after Him was buried. « There therefore, because of the Preparation of the Jews, since the tomb was near at hand, they laid Jesus. » He wishes the burial to be understood as hastened, lest evening should come on; when, because of the Preparation, which the Jews among us more usually call in Latin the pure supper, it was no longer lawful to do any such thing.
6. Una autem sabbati Maria Magdalene venit mane, cum adhuc tenebrae essent, ad monumentum; et vidit lapidem sublatum a monumento. Una sabbati est, quem jam diem dominicum propter Domini resurrectionem mos Christianus appellat: quem Matthaeus solus in Evangelistis primam sabbati nominavit (Matth. XXVIII, 1). Cucurrit ergo, et venit ad Simonem Petrum, et ad alium discipulum quem amabat Jesus; et dicit eis: Tulerunt Dominum de monumento, et nescimus ubi posuerunt eum. Nonnulli codices etiam graeci habent, Tulerunt Dominum meum, quod videri dictum potest propensiore charitatis vel famulatus affectu; sed hoc in pluribus codicibus quos in promptu habuimus, non invenimus.
6. And on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene came early, while it was still dark, to the tomb; and she saw the stone taken away from the tomb. The first day of the week is the one which Christian custom now calls the Lord's day on account of the Lord's resurrection: which Matthew alone among the Evangelists named the first of the week (Matt. 28:1). She ran therefore, and came to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved; and she says to them: They have taken away the Lord from the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid Him. Some codices, Greek ones too, have, They have taken away my Lord, which may seem to have been said from a more inclined affection of love or of service; but we have not found this in the greater number of codices that we had at hand.
7. Exiit ergo Petrus et ille alius discipulus, et venerunt ad monumentum. Currebant autem duo simul, et ille alius discipulus praecucurrit citius Petro, et venit primus ad monumentum. Advertenda hic et commendanda est recapitulatio, quomodo reditum est ad id
7. Peter therefore went out, and that other disciple, and they came to the tomb. And the two were running together, and that other disciple ran ahead faster than Peter, and came first to the tomb. Here the recapitulation is to be noticed and commended, how a return is made to that
Editors' notes and page, col. 1954

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1954

Eam revelationem, qua ipsius etiam Nicodemi corpus detectum fuit, ad anni 415 finem referunt, freti auctoritate Luciani presbyteri, in libello hac de re conscripto.

The revelation by which the body of Nicodemus himself was also discovered is dated to the end of the year 415, on the authority of the priest Lucian, in the little book he wrote on the matter.

(printed under page 325)

Page

  • running head: US CXX. CAPUT XIX. 1954 (cut off at the left edge of the image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)