Migne Reading Room

PL 35 · cols. 1955–1958

Augustinus, In Joannis Evangelium tractatus CXVII-CXXIII

Tractate CXXI

PL 35:1955
quod fuerat praetermissum; et tamen quasi hoc sequeretur adjunctum est. Cum enim jam dixisset, venerunt ad monumentum, regressus est ut narraret quomodo venerunt; atque ait, currebant autem duo simul, etc. Ubi ostendit quod praecurrens ad monumentum prior venerit alius ille discipulus, quem seipsum significat, sed tanquam de alio cuncta narrat.
which had been passed over; and yet it was added as though this followed. For when he had already said, they came to the tomb, he went back to narrate how they came; and he says, now the two were running together, etc. Here he shows that, running on ahead, that other disciple arrived first at the tomb, whom he indicates to be himself, though he narrates everything as if about another.
8. « Et cum se inclinasset, inquit, vidit posita linteamina, non tamen introivit. Venit ergo Simon Petrus sequens eum, et introivit in monumentum; et vidit linteamina posita, et sudarium quod fuerat super caput ejus, non cum linteaminibus positum, sed separatim involutum in unum locum. » Putamusne nihil ista significant? Nequaquam hoc putaverim. Sed ad alia festinamus, in quibus immorari quaestionis vel obscuritatis alicujus necessitate compellimur. Nam ista quae per seipsa manifesta sunt, quid singula etiam significent, quaerere sanctae quidem deliciae sunt, sed otiosorum, quod non sumus nos.
8. "And when he had stooped down," he says, "he saw the linen cloths lying, yet he did not go in. Then Simon Peter came following him, and went into the tomb; and he saw the linen cloths lying, and the napkin that had been upon His head, not lying with the linen cloths, but wrapped up separately in one place." Do we suppose these things signify nothing? I would by no means suppose that. But we are hastening on to other things, on which we are compelled to linger by the necessity of some question or obscurity. For to inquire what each detail also signifies in things that are plain in themselves is indeed a holy delight, but one for those at leisure, which we are not.
9. Tunc ergo introiit, et ille discipulus qui venerat primus ad monumentum. Prior venit, et posterior intravit. Neque hoc utique vacat, sed mihi ad ista non vacat. Et vidit, inquit, et credidit. Hic nonnulli parum attendentes, putant hoc Joannem credidisse, quod Jesus resurrexit; sed quod sequitur, hoc non indicat. Quid sibi enim vult quod statim adjunxit, Nondum enim sciebant Scripturam, quia oportet eum a mortuis resurgere? Non ergo eum credidit resurrexisse, quem nesciebat oportere resurgere. Quid ergo vidit? quid credidit? Vidit scilicet inane monumentum, et credidit quod dixerat mulier, eum de monumento esse sublatum. Nondum enim sciebant Scripturam, quia oporteret eum a mortuis resurgere. Et ideo quando id ab ipso Domino audiebant, quamvis apertissime diceretur; consuetudine audiendi ab illo parabolas, non intelligebant, et aliquid aliud eum significare credebant. Sed ea quae sequuntur in sermonem alium differamus.
9. Then therefore that disciple also went in who had come first to the tomb. He came first, and went in later. Nor is this indeed without meaning, but I have no leisure for such things. And he saw, he says, and believed. Here some, paying too little attention, think that John believed that Jesus had risen; but what follows does not indicate this. For what does it mean that he at once added, For as yet they did not know the Scripture, that He must rise from the dead? So he did not believe that He had risen, Whom he did not know must rise. What then did he see? what did he believe? He saw, namely, the empty tomb, and believed what the woman had said, that He had been taken away from the tomb. For as yet they did not know the Scripture, that He had to rise from the dead. And so when they heard it from the Lord Himself, although it was said most plainly, from their habit of hearing parables from Him they did not understand, and believed that He meant something else. But let us defer what follows to another sermon.
TRACTATUS CXXI. De eo quod sequitur, Abierunt ergo iterum ad semetipsos discipuli; usque ad id, Beati qui non viderunt et crediderunt. Cap. xx, ℣. 10-29.
Tractate 121. On what follows, Then the disciples went away again to themselves; up to, Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed. Chapter 20, verses 10-29.
1. Sublatum esse Dominum de monumento, discipulis ejus Petro et Joanni nuntiaverat Maria Magdalene: quo illi venientes, invenerunt sola linteamina, quibus corpus fuerat involutum; et quid aliud credere potuerunt, nisi quod dixerat, quod etiam ipsa crediderat? Abierunt ergo iterum ad semetipsos discipuli: id est, ubi habitabant, et unde ad monumentum cucurrerant. Maria autem stabat ad monumentum foris plorans. Viris enim redeuntibus, infirmiorem sexum in eodem loco fortior figebat affectus. Et oculi qui Dominum quaesierant et non invenerant, lacrymis jam vacabant, amplius dolentes quod fuerat de monumento ablatus, quam quod fuerat in ligno occisus; quoniam magistri tanti, cujus eis vita subtracta
1. Mary Magdalene had announced to His disciples Peter and John that the Lord had been taken away from the tomb: coming there, they found only the linen cloths in which the body had been wrapped; and what else could they believe but what she had said, what she herself also had believed? Then the disciples went away again to themselves: that is, to where they were staying, and from where they had run to the tomb. But Mary was standing at the tomb outside, weeping. For while the men were going back, a stronger affection fixed the weaker sex in the same place. And the eyes which had sought the Lord and had not found Him were now given over to tears, grieving more that He had been taken away from the tomb than that He had been slain on the tree; since of so great a master, whose life had been withdrawn from them
Editors' notes and page, col. 1955

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1955

Er. Lugd. et Ven., sed tanquam de alio, more sanctæ Scripturæ, cuncta narrat. Verba, more sanctæ Scripturæ, ad textum non pertinere videntur, et apud Er. Guill. necnon apud Lov., uncis concluduntur. M.

Erasmus, the Lyons and the Venice editions read sed tanquam de alio, more sanctæ Scripturæ, cuncta narrat ("but he tells it all as if of another, after the manner of holy Scripture"). The words more sanctæ Scripturæ do not seem to belong to the text, and in Erasmus, Gillot, and also in the Louvain edition they are enclosed in brackets. M.

(printed under page 326)

Page

  • running head: 1955 IN JOANNIS EVANGELIUM, S (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1956
fuerat, nec memoria remanebat. Tenebat itaque ad monumentum jam dolor iste mulierem. Cum ergo fleret, inclinavit se et prospexit in monumentum. Cur hoc fecerit nescio. Non enim nesciebat non ibi esse jam quem quaerebat; quandoquidem inde sublatum et discipulis ipsa nuntiaverat; et illi ad monumentum venerant, et non solum intuendo, sed etiam intrando corpus Domini quaesierant, nec invenerant. Quid sibi ergo vult quod ista cum fleret, rursum in monumentum inclinata prospexit? Utrum quod nimium dolebat, nec suis nec illorum oculis facile putabat esse credendum? An potius divino instinctu in animo ejus effectum est ut prospiceret? Prospexit enim, Et vidit duos angelos in albis, sedentes, unum ad caput, et unum ad pedes, ubi positum fuerat corpus Jesu. Quid est quod unus ad caput, et ad pedes alter sedebat? An, quoniam qui graece Angeli dicuntur, latine sunt nuntii, isto modo Christi Evangelium velut a capite usque ad pedes, ab initio usque in finem significabant esse nuntiandum? Dicunt ei illi: Mulier, quid ploras? Dicit eis: Quia tulerunt Dominum meum, et nescio ubi posueruut eum. Angeli lacrymas prohibebant: ubi quid aliud quam futurum quodammodo gaudium nuntiabant? Ita enim dixerunt, Quid ploras? ac si dicerent, Noli plorare. At illa eos putans interrogasse nescientes, causas prodit lacrymarum. Quia tulerunt, inquit, Dominum meum: Dominum suum vocans corpus exanime Domini sui, a toto partem significans; sicut omnes confitemur Jesum Christum Filium Dei unicum Dominum nostrum, quod utique simul est et Verbum et anima et caro, crucifixum tamen et sepultum, cum sola ejus sepulta sit caro. Et nescio, inquit, ubi posuerunt eum. Haec erat causa major doloris, quia nesciebat quo iret ad consolandum dolorem. Sed hora jam venerat qua id quod nuntiatum quodammodo fuerat ab angelis flere prohibentibus, gaudium succederet fletibus.
not even a memory remained. So this grief now held the woman at the tomb. As she wept, then, she bent down and looked into the tomb. Why she did this I do not know. For she was not unaware that He Whom she was seeking was no longer there, since she herself had also reported to the disciples that He had been taken away from there; and they had come to the tomb, and had sought the Lord's body not only by looking but also by going in, and had not found it. What then does it mean that she, as she wept, bent down again into the tomb and looked? Was it that, because she grieved too much, she thought that neither her own eyes nor theirs should easily be believed? Or rather was it brought about in her mind by a divine prompting that she should look? For she looked, And she saw two angels in white, sitting, one at the head and one at the feet, where the body of Jesus had been laid. What is it that one sat at the head and the other at the feet? Was it that, since those who in Greek are called angels are in Latin messengers, they signified in this way that the Gospel of Christ was to be announced as it were from the head to the feet, from the beginning to the end? They say to her: Woman, why are you weeping? She says to them: Because they have taken away my Lord, and I do not know where they have laid Him. The angels were forbidding her tears: and in this what else were they announcing but, in a certain manner, the joy to come? For thus they said, Why are you weeping? as if they were saying, Do not weep. But she, thinking that they had asked without knowing, discloses the causes of her tears. Because they have taken away, she says, my Lord: calling the lifeless body of her Lord her Lord, signifying the part by the whole; just as we all confess Jesus Christ the only Son of God our Lord, Who is certainly at once both Word and soul and flesh, yet crucified and buried, though His flesh alone was buried. And I do not know, she says, where they have laid Him. This was the greater cause of her grief, that she did not know where to go to console her grief. But the hour had now come in which that which had in a certain manner been announced by the angels when they forbade her to weep, joy, should succeed to her weeping.
2. Denique « haec cum dixisset, conversa est retrorsum, et vidit Jesum stantem, et non sciebat quia Jesus est. Dicit ei Jesus: Mulier, quid ploras? Quem quaeris? Illa existimans quia hortulanus esset, dicit ei: Domine, si tu sustulisti eum, dicito mihi ubi posuisti eum, et ego eum tollam. Dicit ei Jesus.: Maria. Conversa illa dicit ei, Rabboni; quod dicitur Magister. » Nemo calumnietur mulieri quod hortulanum dixerit dominum, et Jesum Magistrum. Ibi enim rogabat, hic agnoscebat: ibi honorabat hominem a quo beneficium postulabat; hic recolebat doctorem a quo discernere humana et divina discebat. Appellabat dominum cujus ancilla non erat, ut per eum perveniret ad Dominum cujus erat. Aliter ergo Dominum dixit, Sustulerunt Dominum meum; aliter autem, Domine, si tu sustulisti eum. Nam et Prophetae appellaverunt dominos eos qui homines erant; sed aliter illum de quo scriptum est, Dominus nomen ei (Psal. LXVII, 5). Sed ista mulier quae jam fuerat conversa retrorsum ut videret Jesum, quando eum putavit esse hortulanum, et cum illo utique loquebatur, quomodo rursus conversa dicitur, ut ei diceret, Rabb⟨o⟩ni,
2. Then « when she had said this, she turned round and saw Jesus standing, and she did not know that it was Jesus. Jesus says to her: Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you seeking? She, supposing that He was the gardener, says to Him: Sir, if you have carried Him off, tell me where you have laid Him, and I will take Him away. Jesus says to her: Mary. She, turning, says to Him, Rabboni; which means Master. » Let no one find fault with the woman for calling the gardener lord, and Jesus Master. For there she was asking, here she was recognizing: there she was honouring a man from whom she was requesting a favour; here she was recalling the teacher from whom she was learning to distinguish things human and divine. She was calling lord one whose handmaid she was not, so that through him she might come to the Lord Whose handmaid she was. In one sense, then, she said Lord in They have carried off my Lord; in another sense, Sir, if you have carried Him off. For the Prophets too called lords those who were men; but in another sense Him of Whom it is written, The Lord is His name (Ps. 67:5). But this woman, who had already turned round to see Jesus, when she thought Him to be the gardener, and was certainly speaking with Him, how is she said to have turned again, so as to say to Him, Rabboni,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1956

Page

  • running head: [cut off at left] EVANGELIUM, S. AUGUSTINI 1956
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 35:1957
nisi quia tunc conversa corpore, quod non erat, putavit, nunc corde conversa, quod erat agnovit?
if not because then, turned in body, she thought Him what He was not, and now, turned in heart, she recognized what He was?
3. « Dicit ei Jesus: Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem meum: vade autem ad fratres meos, et dic eis, Ascendo ad Patrem meum et Patrem vestrum, Deum meum et Deum vestrum. » Est in his verbis quod breviter quidem, sed tamen attentius pertractare debemus. Jesus quippe mulierem quae illum magistrum agnovit et appellavit, cum haec ei responderet, fidem docebat: et hortulanus ille in ejus corde, tanquam in horto suo granum sinapis seminabat. Quid est ergo, Noli me tangere? Et tanquam hujus prohibitionis causa quaereretur, adjunxit, nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem meum. Quid est hoc? Si stans in terra non tangitur, sedens in coelo quomodo ab hominibus tangeretur? Qui certe antequam ascenderet, discipulis se tangendum obtulit dicens, sicut Lucas evangelista testatur, Palpate, et videte, quia spiritus carnem et ossa non habet, sicut me videtis habere (Luc. XXIV, 39): vel quando dixit discipulo Thomae, Infer digitum tuum huc, et vide manus meas, et affer manum tuam, et mitte in latus meum. Quis autem tam sit absurdus, ut dicat eum a discipulis quidem antequam ad Patrem ascendisset, voluisse se tangi; a mulieribus autem noluisse, nisi cum ascendisset ad Patrem? Sed nec sic, qui vellet, desipere sineretur. Leguntur enim etiam feminae post resurrectionem antequam ad Patrem ascenderet, tetigisse Jesum, in quibus erat etiam ipsa Maria Magdalene, narrante Matthaeo quod occurrerit illis Jesus dicens, Avete. Illae autem accesserunt, inquit, et tenuerunt pedes ejus et adoraverunt eum (Matth. XXVIII, 9). Hoc a Joanne praetermissum est, sed a Matthaeo verum dictum. Restat ergo ut aliquod in his verbis lateat sacramentum; quod sive inveniamus, sive invenire minime valeamus, inesse tamen nullo modo dubitare debemus. Aut ergo sic dictum est, Noli me tangere, nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem meum, ut in illa femina figuraretur Ecclesia de Gentibus, quae in Christum non credidit, nisi cum ascendisset ad Patrem: aut sic in se credi voluit Jesus, hoc est, sic se spiritualiter tangi, quod ipse et Pater unum sint. Ejus quippe intimis sensibus quodammodo ascendit ad Patrem, qui sic in eo profecerit ut Patri agnoscat aequalem: aliter non recte tangitur, id est, aliter non recte in eum creditur. Poterat autem sic credere Maria, ut eum putaret imparem Patri, quod utique prohibetur cum ei dicitur, Noli me tangere: id est, Noli in me sic credere, quemadmodum adhuc sapis; noli tuum sensum huc usque pertendere quod pro te factus sum, nec transire ad illud per quod facta es. Quomodo enim non carnaliter adhuc in eum credebat, quem sicut hominem flebat? Nondum enim ascendi, inquit, ad Patrem meum: ibi me tanges, quando me credideris Patri non imparem Deum. Vade autem ad fratres meos, et dic eis, Ascendo ad Patrem meum et Patrem vestrum. Non ait, Patrem nostrum: aliter ergo meum, aliter vestrum; natura meum, gratia vestrum. Et Deum meum, et Deum vestrum. Neque hic dixit, Deum
3. 'Jesus says to her: Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father; but go to my brothers, and say to them, I ascend to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.' There is in these words something which we ought to treat briefly indeed, but nevertheless rather attentively. For Jesus, when He gave her this answer, was teaching faith to the woman who had recognized Him as master and had called Him so; and that gardener was sowing in her heart, as in His own garden, a grain of mustard seed. What then is Do not touch me? And as though the cause of this prohibition were being asked, He added, for I have not yet ascended to my Father. What is this? If, while standing on earth, He is not touched, how would He be touched by men while seated in heaven? Certainly, before He ascended, He offered Himself to the disciples to be touched, saying, as Luke the evangelist testifies, Handle me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see me have (Luke 24:39); or when He said to the disciple Thomas, Put your finger here, and see my hands, and bring your hand, and put it into my side. But who would be so absurd as to say that He was willing to be touched by the disciples before He had ascended to the Father, but unwilling to be touched by the women except when He had ascended to the Father? But not even one who wished to would be allowed to be so foolish. For we read that women too, after the resurrection and before He ascended to the Father, touched Jesus, among whom was Mary Magdalene herself, since Matthew relates that Jesus met them, saying, Hail. And they came up, he says, and took hold of His feet and worshipped Him (Matt. 28:9). This was passed over by John, but truly told by Matthew. It remains, therefore, that some mystery lies hidden in these words; and whether we find it or are quite unable to find it, we ought in no way to doubt that it is there. Either, then, it was said thus, Do not touch me, for I have not yet ascended to my Father, so that in that woman the Church from the Gentiles might be figured, which did not believe in Christ until He had ascended to the Father; or Jesus wished to be believed in thus, that is, to be touched spiritually thus, namely that He and the Father are one. For in a certain way He ascends to the Father in the inmost perceptions of the one who has so advanced in Him as to acknowledge Him equal to the Father: otherwise He is not rightly touched, that is, otherwise He is not rightly believed in. Now Mary could have believed in such a way as to think Him unequal to the Father, and this is certainly forbidden when it is said to her, Do not touch me: that is, Do not believe in me in the way you still understand; do not extend your thought only as far as what I was made for you, without passing on to that through which you were made. For how was she not still believing in Him carnally, when she was weeping for Him as for a man? For I have not yet ascended, He says, to my Father: there you will touch me, when you have believed me to be God not unequal to the Father. But go to my brothers, and say to them, I ascend to my Father and your Father. He does not say, Our Father: therefore He is mine in one way, yours in another; mine by nature, yours by grace. And my God and your God. Nor did He say here, Our
Editors' notes and page, col. 1957

Page

  • running head: 1957 TRACTATUS CXXI. CAP[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "boni", the end of a word (Rabboni) broken from the previous column; its second letter is damaged or blurred (reads like "bcni"), set as b⟨o⟩ni. Some words at the column foot are blurred ("Deum meum" in the italic "Et Deum meum"), read from context. The right-hand column (1958), cut off at the image edge, is not set. No full-width line and no editors' matter in the text block.
PL 35:1958
nostrum: ergo et hic aliter meum, aliter vestrum; Deum meum sub quo et ego homo sum, Deum vestrum inter quos et ipsum mediator sum.
God: therefore here too, mine in one way, yours in another; My God, under Whom I too am a man; your God, between whom and Him I am the mediator.
4. « Venit Maria Magdalene annuntians discipulis, Quia vidi Dominum, et haec dixit mihi. Cum esset ergo sero die illa una sabbatorum, et fores essent clausae, ubi erant discipuli congregati propter metum Judaeorum, venit Jesus, et stetit in medio, et dicit eis: Pax vobis. Et cum hoc dixisset, ostendit eis manus et latus. » Clavi enim manus fixerant, lancea latus ejus aperuerat: ubi ad dubitantium corda sananda, vulnerum sunt servata vestigia. Moli autem corporis ubi divinitas erat, ostia clausa non obstiterunt. Ille quippe non eis apertis intrare potuit, quo nascente virginitas matris inviolata permansit. Gavisi sunt ergo discipuli, viso Domino. Dixit ergo eis iterum: Pax vobis. Iteratio confirmatio est; ipse quippe dat per prophetam promissam pacem super pacem (Isai. XXVI, 3). Sicut misit me Pater, inquit, et ego mitto vos. Aequalem Patri Filium novimus, sed hic verba Mediatoris agnoscimus. Medium quippe se ostendit dicendo, Ille me, et ego vos. Hoc cum dixisset, insufflavit, et dixit eis: Accipite Spiritum sanctum. Insufflando significavit Spiritum sanctum non Patris solius esse Spiritum, sed et suum. Quorum remiseritis, inquit, peccata, remittuntur eis; et quorum retinueritis, retenta sunt. Ecclesiae charitas quae per Spiritum sanctum diffunditur in cordibus nostris, participum suorum peccata dimittit: eorum autem qui non sunt ejus participes, tenet. Ideo posteaquam dixit, Accipite Spiritum sanctum; hoc continuo de peccatorum remissione ac detentione subjecit.
4. « Mary Magdalene came announcing to the disciples, I have seen the Lord, and He said these things to me. When therefore it was evening on that day, the first of the week, and the doors were shut where the disciples were gathered for fear of the Jews, Jesus came, and stood in the midst, and says to them: Peace to you. And when He had said this, He showed them His hands and side. » For nails had pierced the hands, a lance had opened His side: and there, for the healing of the hearts of the doubting, the traces of the wounds were preserved. But to the mass of the body in which divinity was, closed doors were no obstacle. For He could enter without their being opened, at Whose birth the virginity of His mother remained inviolate. The disciples therefore rejoiced, when they had seen the Lord. He said therefore to them again: Peace to you. The repetition is a confirmation; for He Himself gives the peace upon peace promised through the prophet (Isa. 26:3). As the Father has sent Me, He says, I also send you. We know the Son to be equal to the Father, but here we recognize the words of the Mediator. For He shows Himself to be in the middle by saying, He Me, and I you. When He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them: Receive the Holy Spirit. By breathing on them He signified that the Holy Spirit is the Spirit not of the Father alone, but also His own. Whose sins you forgive, He says, they are forgiven them; and whose you retain, they are retained. The charity of the Church, which is poured forth in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, forgives the sins of those who share in it, but retains the sins of those who are not sharers in it. Therefore, after He had said, Receive the Holy Spirit, He immediately added this concerning the remission and retention of sins.
5. « Thomas autem unus ex duodecim, qui dicitur Didymus, non erat cum eis quando venit Jesus: Dixerunt ergo ei alii discipuli: Vidimus Dominum. Ille autem dixit eis: Nisi videro in manibus ejus fixuram clavorum, et mittam digitum meum in locum clavorum, et mittam manum meam in latus ejus, non credam. Et post dies octo iterum erant discipuli ejus intus, et Thomas cum eis. Venit Jesus januis clausis, et stetit in medio, et dixit: Pax vobis. Deinde dicit Thomae: Infer digitum tuum huc, et vide manus meas, et affer manum tuam, et mitte in latus meum; et noli esse incredulus, sed fidelis. Respondit Thomas et dixit ei: Dominus meus et Deus meus. » Videbat tangebatque hominem, et confitebatur Deum quem non videbat neque tangebat; sed per hoc quod videbat atque tangebat, illud jam remota dubitatione credebat. Dicit ei Jesus: Quia vidisti me, credidisti. Non ait, tetigisti me; sed, vidisti me: quoniam generalis quodammodo sensus est visus. Nam et per alios quatuor sensus nominari solet: velut cum dicimus, Audi et vide quam bene sonet, olfac et vide quam bene oleat, gusta et vide quam bene sapiat, tange et vide quam bene caleat. Ubique sonuit, Vide, cum visus proprie non negetur ad oculos pertinere. Unde et hic ipse Dominus, Infer, inquit, digitum tuum huc, et vide manus meas: quid aliud ait quam, Tange et vide? Nec tamen oculos ille habebat in digito. Ergo sive
5. « But Thomas, one of the twelve, who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came: the other disciples therefore said to him: We have seen the Lord. But he said to them: Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe. And after eight days His disciples were again inside, and Thomas with them. Jesus came, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said: Peace to you. Then He says to Thomas: Bring your finger here, and see My hands, and bring your hand, and put it into My side; and do not be unbelieving, but believing. Thomas answered and said to Him: My Lord and my God. » He saw and touched the man, and confessed the God Whom he neither saw nor touched; but through that which he saw and touched, he now believed the other, doubt having been removed. Jesus says to him: Because you have seen Me, you have believed. He does not say, you have touched Me; but, you have seen Me: since sight is in a certain way the general sense. For it is customarily named also in reference to the other four senses: as when we say, Hear and see how well it sounds, smell and see how well it smells, taste and see how well it tastes, touch and see how warm it is. Everywhere "See" has sounded, although sight is not denied properly to pertain to the eyes. Hence here too the Lord Himself says, Bring your finger here, and see My hands: what else does He say but, Touch and see? Yet he did not have eyes in his finger. Therefore whether
Editors' notes and page, col. 1958

Page

  • running head: [IN JOANNIS EVANG. TRAC]TUS CXXI. CAPUT XX. 1958
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: running head cut off at left edge of image; column number print is blurred (could read 1953) but set as 1958 per task; the left column of the page (column 1957) is partly visible at the image edge and not set; column begins mid-sentence with "nostrum" and ends mid-sentence with "sive"; the D of "Didymus" carries a stray mark (damaged type?), read as Didymus