Migne Reading Room

PL 38 · cols. 1130–1137

Augustine, Sermones 234-243 (Classis II, de Tempore)

Sermons CCXL–CCXLI

PL 38:1130
quos invenit in via! Tu esto in via, non deerit hospes Christus. Putas enim jam non tibi licere suscipere Christum? Unde, inquis, licet? Jam resurgens manifestatus est discipulis suis, ascendit in coelum, ibi est ad dexteram Patris; non est venturus nisi in ultimo saeculo ad judicandos vivos et mortuos: venturus autem in claritate, non in infirmitate; daturus regnum, non quaesiturus hospitium. Quando dabit regnum, excidit tibi quod dicturus est: Cum uni ex minimis meis fecistis, mihi fecistis (Matth. XXV, 40)? Ille dives, egens est usque in finem saeculi. Eget prorsus, non in capite, sed in membris suis. Ubi eget? In quibus doluit, quando dixit: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris (Act. IX, 4)? Obsequamur ergo Christo. Nobiscum est in suis, nobiscum est in nobis: nec frustra dixit, Ecce ego vobiscum sum usque ad consummationem saeculi (Matth. XXVIII, 20). Haec faciendo agnoscimus Christum in bonis operibus, non corpore, sed corde; non oculis carnis, sed oculis fidei. Quia vidisti, credidisti, ait cuidam discipulo suo incredulo, qui dixerat, Non credam, nisi tetigero. Et Dominus: Veni, tange, et noli esse incredulus. Tetigit, et clamavit: Dominus meus et Deus meus! Et Dominus: Quia vidisti me, credidisti (Joan. XX, 25-29). Ipsa est tota fides tua, quia credis quod vides: laudo eos qui non vident, et credunt; quia cum viderint, gaudebunt.
whom He found on the way! Be on the way yourself, and Christ will not be lacking as a guest. For do you think that it is no longer permitted to you to receive Christ? How, you say, is it permitted? Having now risen, He was made manifest to His disciples, He ascended into heaven, there He is at the right hand of the Father; He is not going to come except at the last age, to judge the living and the dead: but He will come in glory, not in weakness; to give a kingdom, not to seek hospitality. When He gives the kingdom, has it slipped your mind what He is going to say: Since you did it to one of the least of Mine, you did it to Me (Matt. 25:40)? That rich One is needy until the end of the age. He is needy indeed, not in the head, but in His members. Where is He needy? In those in whom He felt pain, when He said: Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me (Acts 9:4)? Let us therefore serve Christ. He is with us in His own, He is with us in ourselves: nor did He say in vain, Behold, I am with you until the consummation of the age (Matt. 28:20). By doing these things we recognize Christ in good works, not with the body, but with the heart; not with the eyes of the flesh, but with the eyes of faith. Because you have seen, you have believed, He said to a certain unbelieving disciple of His, who had said, I will not believe unless I touch. And the Lord: Come, touch, and do not be unbelieving. He touched, and cried out: My Lord and my God! And the Lord: Because you have seen Me, you have believed (John 20:25–29). That is the whole of your faith, that you believe what you see: I praise those who do not see, and believe; because when they see, they will rejoice.
SERMO CCXL. In diebus Paschalibus, XI. De Resurrectione corporum, contra Gentiles.
Sermon 240. On the days of Easter, 11. On the resurrection of bodies, against the Gentiles.
CAPUT PRIMUM. — Num. 1. Evangelistarum in historia resurrectionis varietas sine discordia. Defensio fidei titubantibus necessaria. Per hos dies, sicut recolit Charitas vestra, solemniter leguntur evangelicae lectiones ad resurrectionem Domini pertinentes. Omnes enim Evangelistae quatuor, neque de passione, neque de resurrectione ejus tacere potuerunt. Nam quia multa fecit Dominus Jesus, non omnes omnia conscripserunt: sed alius ista, alius illa; summa tamen concordia veritatis. Multa etiam commemorat Joannes evangelista facta esse a Domino Jesu Christo, quae a nullo eorum conscripta sunt. Tanta facta sunt, quanta tunc fieri debuerunt: tanta scripta sunt, quanta nunc legi d⟨e⟩buerunt. Ut autem ostendantur Evangelistae omnes quatuor, in eo quod simul omnes dicunt et non praetermittunt, id est, vel de passione, vel de resurrectione Christi, non inter se dixisse contraria, valde operosus est labor. Nonnulli enim putaverunt eos inter se esse contrarios, cum ipsi essent contrarii animae suae. Et ideo data est opera ab eis qui potuerunt, adjuvante Domino, ut ostenderentur inter se non esse contrarii. Sed, sicut dixi, si hoc vobis ostendam, et in populo velim ista tractare, multitudo audientium prius obruitur taedio, quam reveletur scientia veritatis. Sed scio fidem vestram, id est, fidem hujus totius
Chapter I. — No. 1. Variety without discord among the Evangelists in the account of the resurrection. A defence of the faith necessary for those who waver. During these days, as your Charity recalls, the Gospel readings pertaining to the resurrection of the Lord are solemnly read. For all four Evangelists were unable to keep silent either about His passion or about His resurrection. For since the Lord Jesus did many things, not all of them wrote down everything: but one wrote these things, another those; yet there is the highest concord of truth. John the Evangelist also mentions that many things were done by the Lord Jesus Christ which have been written down by none of them. As many things were done as ought to have been done then: as many were written as ought to be read now. But to show that all four Evangelists, in what they all say together and do not pass over, that is, whether concerning the passion or concerning the resurrection of Christ, did not say things contrary to one another, is a very laborious task. For some have thought that they were contrary to one another, when they themselves were contrary to their own soul. And therefore pains were taken by those who were able, with the Lord's help, to show that they were not contrary to one another. But, as I said, if I were to show you this, and wished to treat these matters before the people, the multitude of hearers is overwhelmed by weariness before the knowledge of the truth is revealed. But I know your faith, that is, the faith of this whole
Editors' notes and page, col. 1130

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: quam revelelur› · call in col 1130

¹ Mss., relevatur; aut, relevetur.

The manuscripts have "relevatur" or "relevetur" (is lightened).

(*) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXL› · call in col 1130 * Emendatus ad duos cb. ad d. gr. r. t. v. vd. Am. Er. Par. Lov.

Emended against two cb. [manuscripts], against d. gr. r. t. v. vd., and the Amerbach, Erasmus, Paris and Louvain editions.

(printed under page 571)

(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXL *› · call in col 1130

(printed under page 571)

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXL.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1131
multitudinis, et eorum qui hodie hic non sunt, et tamen fideles sunt; novi fidem eorum sic esse certam de veritate Evangelistarum, ut expositione mea non indigeant. Qui novit quomodo ista defendat, doctior est, non fidelior. Habet fidem, habet facultatem defendendi fidem. Alius non habet facultatem et copiam et doctrinam defendendi fidem, sed habet ipsam fidem. Ille autem qui novit defendere fidem, titubantibus est necessarius, non credentibus. In defensione enim fidei, curantur vulnera dubitationis vel infidelitatis. Qui ergo defendit fidem, bonus est medicus: sed in te non est infidelitatis morbus. Quando ille novit curare quod tu non habes? Novit ille ponere medicamentum, sed in te non est vitium. Non est opus sanis medicus, sed male habentibus (Matth. IX, 12).
multitude, and of those who are not here today and yet are faithful; I know that their faith in the truthfulness of the Evangelists is so certain that they do not need my exposition. He who knows how to defend these things is more learned, not more faithful. He has faith, and he has the ability to defend the faith. Another has not the ability and the resources and the learning to defend the faith, but he has the faith itself. But he who knows how to defend the faith is necessary to those who waver, not to those who believe. For in the defence of the faith the wounds of doubt or of unbelief are healed. He therefore who defends the faith is a good physician: but in you there is no disease of unbelief. When does he know how to cure what you do not have? He knows how to apply the remedy, but in you there is no defect. There is no need of a physician for the healthy, but for those who are unwell (Matt. 9:12).
CAPUT II. — 2. Resurrectio contra infideles probatur ex omnipotentia Dei. Tamen quae possunt expeditius dici pro tempore, et commodius audiri, subticere vobis non est consilii. De ipsa resurrectione, cujus in se ipso Dominus praemisit exemplum, ut sciremus quid etiam in corporibus nostris in fine saeculi sperare debeamus, multi multa disputant; aliqui fideliter, aliqui infideliter. Qui fideliter disputant, scire volunt diligentius quid respondeant infidelibus: qui autem infideliter disputant, argumentantur contra animas suas, disputando contra potentiam Omnipotentis, dicentes: Unde fieri potest ut mortuus resurgat? Dico ego, Deus est qui facit, et tu dicis, Fieri non potest? Non dico, Da mihi Christianum, da mihi Judaeum: sed, da mihi Paganum, idolorum cultorem, daemonum servum, qui non dicat Deum esse omnipotentem. Negare Christum potest, negare omnipotentem Deum non potest. Quem tu ergo credis; quasi Pagano loquor; quem tu credis Deum omnipotentem, ipsum ego dico mortuorum suscitatorem. Si dixeris, Non potest fieri, derogas Omnipotenti. Si autem credis illum omnipotentem, me quare respuis ista dicentem?
Chapter II. — 2. The resurrection is proved against unbelievers from the omnipotence of God. Nevertheless, it is not my intention to withhold from you the things that can be said more briefly, given the time, and heard more conveniently. Concerning the resurrection itself, of which the Lord set forth beforehand an example in Himself, so that we might know what we ought to hope for in our bodies too at the end of the world, many people dispute many things; some faithfully, some unfaithfully. Those who dispute faithfully wish to know more thoroughly what they should answer to unbelievers: but those who dispute unfaithfully argue against their own souls, disputing against the power of the Omnipotent, saying: How can it come about that a dead man should rise again? I say, It is God Who does it, and do you say, It cannot be done? I do not say, Give me a Christian, give me a Jew: but, give me a pagan, a worshipper of idols, a slave of demons, who does not say that God is omnipotent. He can deny Christ; he cannot deny God omnipotent. Him, then, in whom you believe (I speak as though to a pagan), Him whom you believe to be God omnipotent, I declare to be the raiser of the dead. If you say, It cannot be done, you detract from the Omnipotent. But if you believe Him to be omnipotent, why do you spurn me when I say these things?
CAPUT III. — 3. Caro resurget sine vitio. Calamitatum omnium causa peccatum. Si diceremus carnem resurrecturam, ut esuriat, ut sitiat, ut aegrotet, ut laboret; ut corruptionibus subjiciatur; merito credere non deberes. Habet enim modo caro ista has vel necessitates vel calamitates. Et hoc unde? Causa peccatum est. In uno peccavimus, et omnes ad corruptionem nati sumus. Malorum omnium nostrorum causa peccatum est. Non enim sine causa homines mala ista patiuntur. Justus est Deus, omnipotens est Deus: nullo modo ista pateremur, si non mereremur. Sed cum essemus in poenis, ad quas venimus de peccatis, Dominus noster Jesus Christus voluit esse in poenis nostris sine peccatis suis. Sustinendo sine culpa poenam, et culpam solvit et poenam. Culpam solvit, peccata donando: poenam solvit, a mortuis resurgendo. Hoc promisit, et nos in spe ambulare voluit: perseveremus, et ad rem perveniemus. Caro resurget incorruptibilis, caro resurget sine vitio, sina deformitate, sine mortalitate, sine onere, sine
Chapter III. — 3. The flesh will rise without defect. Sin is the cause of all calamities. If we were saying that the flesh will rise again in order to hunger, to thirst, to be sick, to toil, to be subject to corruptions, you would rightly refuse to believe it. For this flesh now has these necessities or calamities. And whence is this? The cause is sin. In one man we sinned, and we are all born unto corruption. The cause of all our evils is sin. For it is not without cause that men suffer these evils. God is just, God is omnipotent: we would in no way suffer these things if we did not deserve them. But since we were in punishments, into which we came from our sins, our Lord Jesus Christ willed to be in our punishments without sins of His own. By bearing the punishment without the fault, He did away with both the fault and the punishment. He did away with the fault by forgiving sins: He did away with the punishment by rising from the dead. This He promised, and He willed that we should walk in hope: let us persevere, and we shall come to the reality. The flesh will rise incorruptible, the flesh will rise without defect, without deformity, without mortality, without burden, without
Editors' notes and page, col. 1131

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1131

¹ Mss., subtrahere.

The manuscripts have "subtrahere" (to withdraw).

(printed under page 572)

Page

  • running head: 1131 S. AUGUSTINI EPISC[...] (cut off at right edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1132
pondere. Quae nunc tibi facit tormentum, postea tibi erit ornamentum. Ergo si bonum est habere corpus incorruptibile, quare hoc facturum Deum volumus desperare?
weight. What now causes you torment will afterwards be an ornament to you. Therefore, if it is good to have an incorruptible body, why do we wish to despair of God's doing this?
CAPUT IV. — 4. Philosophorum de animae conditione post mortem opiniones. Philosophi saeculi hujus, qui magni fuerunt et docti, et caeteris meliores, animam humanam immortalem esse senserunt: nec solum senserunt, sed quantis potuerunt argumentationibus defenderunt, et ipsas defensiones suas conscriptas posteris reliquerunt. Sunt libri, leguntur. Ideo istos philosophos dixi aliis fuisse meliores in comparatione pejorum; quia fuerunt philosophi qui dicerent homini, cum mortuus fuerit, nullam vitam postea remanere. Talibus illi utique praeponendi sunt. Et in quo erant illi meliores, quamvis in multis a veritate deviantes, tamen in quo erant isti superiores, veritati fuerant propinquantes. Illi ergo qui senserunt atque dixerunt animas humanas immortales, de malis hominum, de aerumnis erroribusque mortalium quaesierunt causas, quantum homines potuerunt; et dixerunt, sicut potuerunt, praecessisse nescio quae in alia vita peccata, quorum peccatorum merito ista corpora velut carcerem animae mererentur. Deinde quaesitum est ab eis, quid postea cum fuerit homo mortuus, quid erit. Et hic contriverunt ingenia sua; et laboraverunt, quantum potuerunt, reddere hominibus rationem, vel sibi, vel aliis: et dixerunt, animas hominum male viventium immundas pessimis moribus, cum exierint de corporibus, rursus continuo revolvi ad alia corpora, et poenas hic luere quas videmus; eas vero animas quae bene vixerunt, cum exierint de corporibus, ire ad superna coelorum, requiescere ibi in stellis et luminibus istis conspicuis, vel quibuscumque coelestibus abditisque secretis, oblivisci omnium praeteritorum malorum, et rursus delectari redire ad corpora, et venire iterum ad ista patienda. Hoc ergo interesse voluerunt inter animas peccatorum et animas justorum, quia peccatorum animas de proximo statim cum exierint de corporibus, dicunt revolvi ad altera corpora; justorum autem animas diu esse in requie; non tamen semper, sed rursus delectari corporibus, et de summis coelis post tantam justitiam ad ista mala facere ruinam.
Chapter IV. — 4. The opinions of the philosophers on the condition of the soul after death. The philosophers of this world, who were great and learned, and better than the rest, held that the human soul is immortal: and not only did they hold it, but they defended it with as many arguments as they could, and left their very defences written down for posterity. The books exist; they are read. I said that these philosophers were better than others by comparison with worse ones, because there were philosophers who would tell a man that, when he has died, no life remains afterwards. To such men those others are certainly to be preferred. And in the point in which they were better, although straying from the truth in many things, yet in the point in which they were superior, they had been drawing near to the truth. Those, then, who held and said that human souls are immortal sought the causes of the evils of men, of the hardships and errors of mortals, as far as men could; and they said, as far as they could, that some sins or other had gone before in another life, by the desert of which sins souls deserved these bodies as a prison. Then they were asked what will be afterwards, when a man has died. And here they wore out their wits; and they laboured, as much as they could, to render an account to men, either to themselves or to others: and they said that the souls of men who live badly, unclean with the worst habits, when they have gone out of their bodies, are straightway rolled back again into other bodies, and pay here the penalties which we see; but that those souls which have lived well, when they have gone out of their bodies, go to the heights of the heavens, rest there in the stars and in those visible lights, or in whatever heavenly and hidden secret places, forget all past evils, and again take delight in returning to bodies, and come once more to suffer these things. This, then, they would have to be the difference between the souls of sinners and the souls of the righteous: that the souls of sinners, forthwith and at once when they have gone out of their bodies, they say are rolled back into other bodies; but that the souls of the righteous are for a long time at rest; not, however, for ever, but they again take delight in bodies, and from the highest heavens, after such great righteousness, make a fall into these evils.
CAPUT V. — Sapientia mundi Deo stultitia. Resurrectio promissa piis credentibus in Mediatorem. Hoc dixerunt valde magni philosophi. Isto plus invenire nihil potuerunt philosophi mundi hujus, de quibus dicit Scriptura nostra: Stultam fecit Deus sapientiam hujus mundi. Si sapientiam, quanto magis stultitiam? Si sapientia mundi stultitia est apud Deum, vera stultitia mundi quam longe est a Deo? Est tamen quaedam stultitia mundi hujus, quae pervenit ad Deum, de qua dicit Apostolus: Quoniam in sapientia Dei non cognovit mundus per sapientiam Deum, placuit Deo per stultitiam praedicationis salvos facere credentes. Et dicit: « Quoniam Judaei signa petunt, et Graeci sapientiam quaerunt: nos autem praedicamus Christum
Chapter V. — The wisdom of the world is foolishness to God. Resurrection promised to the devout who believe in the Mediator. This is what very great philosophers said. More than this the philosophers of this world could find nothing, of whom our Scripture says: God has made foolish the wisdom of this world. If its wisdom, how much more its foolishness? If the wisdom of the world is foolishness with God, how far from God is the true foolishness of the world? Yet there is a certain foolishness of this world which attains to God, of which the Apostle says: Since in the wisdom of God the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the foolishness of preaching to save those who believe. And he says: “Since the Jews ask for signs, and the Greeks seek wisdom: but we preach Christ
Editors' notes and page, col. 1132

Page

  • running head: [S. A]UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 1132 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column number in the head looks like "1152" in the scan, taken as 1132; fragments of the left column (1131) visible at left edge, not set; a small mark like "3" between the columns beside "scriptas posteris" and a stroke at the right edge beside "incorruptibile", unclear, not set; "leguntur" and "Graeci" slightly damaged but legible; no section numeral printed with CAPUT V; the quotation opened with « continues into the next column
PL 38:1133
crucifixum; Judaeis quidem scandalum, Gentibus stultitiam; ipsis autem vocatis Judaeis et Graecis Christum Dei virtutem et Dei sapientiam » (I Cor. I, 20-24). Venit Dominus Christus, sapientia Dei: coelum tonat: ranae taceant. Quod dixit veritas, hoc est verum. Quod dixit, in malo quidem esse genus humanum causa peccati, manifestum est. Sed qui crediderit in Mediatorem, qui constitutus est medius inter Deum et homines (inter Deum justum et homines injustos, medius homo justus, humanitatem habens de imo, justitiam de summo; et ideo medius: hinc unum, et inde unum: quia si utrumque inde, ibi esset; si utrumque hinc, nobiscum jaceret, et medius non esset): qui ergo crediderit in Mediatorem, et fideliter ac bene vixerit, exiet quidem de corpore, et erit in requie; postea vero recipiet corpus non ad tormentum, sed ad ornamentum, et vivet cum Deo in aeternum. Non est quod eum delectet ut redeat: quia secum habet corpus. Ergo, charissimi, quoniam proposui vobis hodie quid dicant etiam philosophi mundi hujus, quorum Deus sapientiam tanquam veram stultitiam reprobavit, crastino, adjuvante Domino, exponere poterimus.
crucified; to the Jews indeed a stumbling block, to the Gentiles foolishness; but to those who are called, Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God” (1 Cor. 1:20–24). The Lord Christ came, the wisdom of God: heaven thunders: let the frogs be silent. What the truth said, that is true. What it said, that the human race is indeed in evil because of sin, is manifest. But whoever has believed in the Mediator, Who was established as the one in the middle between God and men (between God Who is just and men who are unjust, a just man in the middle, having humanity from below, justice from on high; and therefore in the middle: one thing from here, and one thing from there: for if both were from there, He would be there; if both were from here, He would lie with us, and would not be in the middle): whoever, then, has believed in the Mediator, and has lived faithfully and well, will indeed go out from the body, and will be at rest; but afterwards he will receive the body not for torment, but for adornment, and will live with God for ever. There is nothing to make him delight in coming back: for he has the body with him. Therefore, dearly beloved, since I have set before you today what even the philosophers of this world say, whose wisdom God has rejected as true folly, tomorrow, with the Lord's help, we shall be able to expound it.
SERMO CCXLI. In diebus Paschalibus, XII. De Resurrectione corporum, contra Gentiles.
Sermon 241. On the days of Easter, 12. On the resurrection of bodies, against the Gentiles.
CAPUT PRIMUM. — 1. Resurrectio fides Christianorum. Deus a philosophis cognitus ex operibus mundi. Propria fides est Christianorum, resurrectio mortuorum. Hanc in se ipso, id est, resurrectionem mortuorum, caput nostrum Christus ostendit, et exemplum fidei nobis praestitit; ut hoc sperent membra in se, quod praecessit in capite. Hesterno die vobis insinuavimus, sapientes Gentium, quos philosophos dicunt, ipsos qui in eis excellentissimi fuerunt, scrutatos fuisse naturam, et de operibus artificem cognovisse (In superiore sermone). Prophetas non audierunt, legem Dei non acceperunt: sed eis Deus quodam modo silens ipsius mundi operibus loquebatur, et eos ad quaerendum artificem rerum, mundi species invitabat: nec potuerunt in animum inducere, coelum et terram sine auctore constare. De his beatus Paulus apostolus ita loquitur: Revelatur, inquit, ira Dei de coelo super omnem impietatem. Quid est, super omnem impietatem? Non solum super Judaeos, qui Dei legem acceperunt, et legis datorem offenderunt; verum etiam super omnem impietatem Gentium revelatur ira Dei de coelo. Et ne quisquam diceret, Quare, cum ipsi legem non acceperint? secutus adjunxit: Et injustitiam eorum qui veritatem in iniquitate detinent. Jam tu responde: Quam veritatem? Non enim acceperunt Legem, non enim audierunt prophetam. Audi quam veritatem: Quoniam quod notum est, inquit, Dei, manifestum est in illis. Unde manifestum? Adhuc audi: Deus enim illis manifestavit.
Chapter I. — 1. The resurrection is the faith of Christians. God known by the philosophers from the works of the world. The proper faith of Christians is the resurrection of the dead. This, that is, the resurrection of the dead, Christ our Head showed in Himself, and furnished us an example of faith; so that the members may hope for in themselves this which went before in the Head. Yesterday we suggested to you that the wise men of the Gentiles, whom they call philosophers, those of them who were most excellent, had searched into nature, and from the works had come to know the Maker (in the preceding sermon). They did not hear the prophets, they did not receive the law of God: but God, in a certain manner silent, was speaking to them by the works of the world itself, and the beauty of the world was inviting them to seek the Maker of things: and they could not bring themselves to think that heaven and earth stand without an author. Of these the blessed apostle Paul speaks thus: The wrath of God, he says, is revealed from heaven upon all impiety. What is, upon all impiety? Not only upon the Jews, who received the law of God and offended the Giver of the law; but also upon all the impiety of the Gentiles the wrath of God is revealed from heaven. And lest anyone should say, Why, since they did not receive the law? he went on to add: And the injustice of those who hold back the truth in iniquity. Now you answer: What truth? For they did not receive the Law, for they did not hear a prophet. Hear what truth: Because what is known, he says, of God, is manifest in them. Whence manifest? Hear further: For God has manifested it to them.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1133

Footnotes

(*) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXLI› · call in col 1133 * Collatus ad omnes Mss. et Edd. in sermone praecedenti modo designatos.

Collated against all the manuscripts and editions just named in the preceding sermon.

(printed under page 573)

(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXLI *› · call in col 1133

(a) Alias, de Tempore 143.

Otherwise numbered: On the Season 143. [last digit faint in the scan: 3 or 5]

(printed under page 573)

Page

  • running head: 1133 SERMO CCXLI.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1134
Si adhuc quaeris, Quomodo manifestavit, quibus legem non dedit? audi quomodo: Invisibilia enim ejus, a constitutione mundi, per ea quae facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur. Invisibilia enim ejus, hoc est, invisibilia Dei: a constitutione mundi, id est, ex quo constituit mundum: per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur, illa per haec intellecta conspiciuntur. Sempiterna quoque; verba Apostoli dico, ipsa attexo: Sempiterna quoque virtus ejus et divinitas, subaudis, Intellecta conspiciuntur. Ut sint inexcusabiles. Quare inexcusabiles? Quia cognoscentes Deum, non sicut Deum glorificaverunt, aut gratias egerunt. Non dixit, Nescientes Deum; sed, cognoscentes.
If you still ask, How did He make it manifest to those to whom He did not give the law? hear how: For His invisible things, from the constitution of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that have been made. His invisible things, that is, the invisible things of God: from the constitution of the world, that is, from the time He constituted the world: are clearly seen, being understood through the things that have been made; those are clearly seen, being understood through these. His eternal also; I am speaking the words of the Apostle, I weave them in: His eternal power also and divinity, and you supply in thought, are clearly seen, being understood. So that they are without excuse. Why without excuse? Because, knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, or give thanks. He did not say, Not knowing God; but, knowing.
CAPUT II. — 2. Pulchritudo creaturarum confessio est Creatoris. Ab hominis cognitione ad cognitionem Dei quomodo pervenerunt philosophi. Unde cognoscentes? Ex his quae fecit. Interroga pulchritudinem terrae, interroga pulchritudinem maris, interroga pulchritudinem dilatati et diffusi aeris, interroga pulchritudinem coeli, interroga ordinem siderum, interroga solem fulgore suo diem clarificantem, interroga lunam splendore subsequentis noctis tenebras temperantem, interroga animalia quae moventur in aquis, quae morantur in terris, quae volitant in aere; latentes animas, perspicua corpora; visibilia regenda, invisibiles regentes: interroga ista, Respondent tibi omnia: Ecce vide, pulchra sumus. Pulchritudo eorum, confessio eorum. Ista pulchra mutabilia quis fecit, nisi incommutabilis pulcher? In ipso denique homine, ut possent intelligere et cognoscere Deum universi mundi creatorem; in ipso, inquam, homine interrogaverunt haec duo, corpus et animam. Hoc interrogabant quod et ipsi gestabant: videbant corpus, animam non videbant. Sed corpus nisi de anima non videbant. Videbant enim per oculum, sed intus erat qui per fenestras aspiciebat. Denique discedente habitatore, jacet domus: discedente qui regebat, cadit quod regebatur: et quoniam cadit, cadaver vocatur. Nonne ibi oculi integri? Etsi pateant, nihil vident. Aures adsunt; sed migravit auditor: linguae organum manet; sed abscessit musicus qui movebat. Interrogaverunt ergo ista duo, corpus quod videtur, animam quae non videtur: et invenerunt melius esse illud quod non videtur, quam illud quod videtur; meliorem animam latentem, deteriorem carnem apparentem. Viderunt ista, intuiti sunt, discusserunt utrumque, et invenerunt utrumque, mutabile in ipso homine. Mutabile corpus per aetates, per corruptiones, per alimenta, per refectiones, per defectiones, per vitam, per mortem. Transierunt ad animam, quam utique comprehenderant meliorem, et etiam invisibilem mirabantur: invenerunt et ipsam mutabilem; modo velle, modo nolle; modo scire, modo nescire; modo meminisse, modo oblivisci; modo timere, modo audere; modo ire in sapientiam, modo in stultitiam deficere. Viderunt et ipsam mutabilem, transierunt et ipsam; quaesierunt enim aliquid immutabile.
Chapter II. — 2. The beauty of creatures is the confession of the Creator. How the philosophers came from the knowledge of man to the knowledge of God. Knowing from where? From the things that He made. Question the beauty of the earth, question the beauty of the sea, question the beauty of the air spread wide and diffused, question the beauty of the sky, question the order of the stars, question the sun lighting up the day with its brightness, question the moon tempering with its splendour the darkness of the night that follows, question the living creatures that move in the waters, that dwell on the lands, that fly in the air; souls hidden, bodies plain to see; visible things to be ruled, invisible ones ruling: question these, they all answer you: Look, see, we are beautiful. Their beauty is their confession. Who made these beautiful mutable things, if not the unchangeable Beautiful One? Finally, in man himself, so that they might be able to understand and know God the creator of the whole world; in man himself, I say, they questioned these two, body and soul. They questioned that which they themselves also carried about: they saw the body, they did not see the soul. But they did not see the body except by means of the soul. For they saw through the eye, but within was the one who looked out through the windows. Finally, when the inhabitant departs, the house lies fallen: when that which ruled departs, that which was ruled falls: and because it falls, it is called a cadaver. Are not the eyes there intact? Even if they lie open, they see nothing. The ears are present; but the hearer has moved away: the instrument of the tongue remains; but the musician who moved it has gone away. So they questioned these two, the body which is seen, the soul which is not seen: and they found that what is not seen is better than what is seen; the hidden soul better, the visible flesh worse. They saw these things, they contemplated them, they examined each, and they found each mutable in man himself. The body mutable through the ages of life, through decay, through nourishment, through refreshment, through failing, through life, through death. They passed over to the soul, which they had certainly grasped as the better, and which they marvelled at even though invisible: they found it too mutable; now willing, now not willing; now knowing, now not knowing; now remembering, now forgetting; now fearing, now daring; now advancing into wisdom, now falling away into folly. They saw that it too was mutable, they passed beyond it too; for they were seeking something immutable.
CAPUT III. — 3. Philosophi post Deum cognitum idololatrae. Sic ergo pervenerunt ad cognoscendum
Chapter III. — 3. The philosophers, after God was known, idolaters. Thus, then, they came to knowing
Editors' notes and page, col. 1134

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXLI. 1134
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "Si adhuc" and it is unclear whether a new paragraph starts there; the second italic "Sempiterna quoque" looks like "Sempiternu" in the scan, set as Sempiterna (UNSURE); no marginal letters are visible in the crops; column ends mid-sentence at "cognoscendum"; scriptural quotation is Rom. 1:20-21, with no printed reference
PL 38:1135
Deum qui fecit, per ista quae fecit. Sed non sicut Deum honorificaverunt, aut gratias egerunt: ipse dicit Apostolus. Sed evanuerunt in cogitationibus suis, et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum. Dicentes se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt. Sibi arrogando quod acceperant, perdiderunt quod tenebant. Dicentes se quasi magnos esse, stulti facti sunt. Et quo pervenerunt? Et immutaverunt, inquit, gloriam incorruptibilis Dei, in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis. Idola dicit. Et ⟨p⟩arum erat facere idolum ad speciem hominis, et ad sui operis similitudinem addicere artificem: parum fuit hoc. Sed insuper quid? Et volucrum, et quadrupedum, et serpentium (Rom. I, 18-23). Omnia quippe ista muta animalia et irrationabilia, illi quasi magni sapientes, deos sibi fecerunt. Reprehendebam, quando adorabas imaginem hominis: quid tibi faciam, quando adoras imaginem canis, imaginem colubri, imaginem crocodili? Pervenerunt usque ad ista. Quantum quaerentes in superna evecti sunt, tantum cadentes in profunda demersi sunt. Altius enim mergitur, quod de alto cadit.
God who made [them], through these things which He made. But they did not honour Him as God, or give thanks: the Apostle himself says it. But they became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened. Saying that they were wise, they became fools. By claiming for themselves what they had received, they lost what they held. Saying that they were, as it were, great, they became fools. And where did they end up? And they changed, he says, the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of corruptible man. He means idols. And it was a small thing to make an idol in the form of a man, and to bind the craftsman to the likeness of his own work: this was a small thing. But what besides? And of birds, and of four-footed beasts, and of serpents (Rom. 1:18–23). For all these dumb and irrational animals those men, as if great sages, made gods for themselves. I used to rebuke you when you worshipped the image of a man: what am I to do with you when you worship the image of a dog, the image of a snake, the image of a crocodile? They went as far as this. As far as they were carried up into the heights in their seeking, so far were they plunged into the depths in their falling. For that which falls from on high sinks the deeper.
CAPUT IV. — 4. De animarum statu post mortem quid senserint philosophi. Illi ergo, sicut hesterno die vos commonui, quaesierunt quid postea, id est, quid post hanc vitam. Quaesierunt sicut homines: sed quando invenirent, cum homines essent? Doctrinam Dei non habuerunt, Prophetas non audierunt: non potuerunt invenire, suspicati sunt. Retuli vobis heri suspiciones illorum. Exeunt animae malae, inquiunt; et quia immundae sunt, continuo in alia corpora revolvuntur: exeunt animae sapientium atque justorum; et quia bene vixerunt, volant ad coelum. Age belle, belle illis invenisti locum: volantes ad coelum perveniunt. Et quid ibi? Ibi erun⟨t⟩, inquiunt, et requiescent cum diis: sedes eorum erunt stellae. Non malum habitaculum illis invenistis: vel ibi illas dimittite, nolite illas dejicere. Sed, inquiunt, post longa tempora, facta penitus oblivione veterum miseriarum, incipiunt velle reverti in corpora; et delectabit eas venire, et rursus veniunt ad ista patienda, ad ista toleranda, ad obliviscendum Deum, ad blasphemandum Deum, ad sequendas corporis voluptates, ad pugnas contra libidines. Veniunt ad istas miserias, unde, et quo? Dic mihi, quare? Quia obliviscuntur. Si omnia mala obliviscuntur, obliviscantur et delectationem carnis. Hoc solum malo suo meminerunt, unde ruerunt. Veniunt: quare? Quia delectat eas rursus in corporibus habitare. Unde delectat, nisi per memoriam, quia ibi aliquando habitaverunt? Dele totam memoriam, et forte residuam facies sapientiam: nihil remaneat quod revocet.
Chapter IV. — 4. What the philosophers thought about the state of souls after death. Those men, then, as I reminded you yesterday, inquired what comes afterwards, that is, what comes after this life. They inquired as men: but when would they find it, since they were men? They did not have the teaching of God, they did not listen to the Prophets: they could not find, they conjectured. I related to you yesterday their conjectures. Evil souls go out, they say; and because they are unclean, they are at once rolled back into other bodies: the souls of the wise and the just go out; and because they have lived well, they fly to heaven. Well done, well done, you have found them a place: flying, they reach heaven. And what there? There they will be, they say, and will rest with the gods: their seats will be the stars. Not a bad dwelling have you found for them: at least leave them there, do not throw them down. But, they say, after long ages, having utterly forgotten their old miseries, they begin to wish to return into bodies; and it will delight them to come, and they come again to suffer these things, to endure these things, to forget God, to blaspheme God, to follow the pleasures of the body, to the battles against lusts. They come to these miseries, from where, and to where? Tell me, why? Because they forget. If they forget all evils, let them forget also the delight of the flesh. This alone they remember, to their own harm, the place from which they fell. They come: why? Because it delights them to dwell again in bodies. Whence does it delight them, if not through memory, because they once dwelt there? Wipe out the whole memory, and perhaps you will leave wisdom as what remains: let nothing remain that might call them back.
CAPUT V. — 5. Virgilio non placet doctrina de animarum reditu in corpora. Animas in ea opinione beatas esse non posse. Exhorruit quidam auctor ipsorum, cui demonstrabatur, vel qui inducebat apud inferos demonstrantem patrem filio suo. Nostis enim hoc prope omnes; atque utinam pauci nossetis. Sed pauci nostis
Chapter V. — 5. The doctrine of the return of souls into bodies does not please Virgil. That souls cannot be blessed under that opinion. A certain author of theirs shuddered at it, to whom it was being shown, or rather who introduced, in the underworld, a father showing it to his son. For nearly all of you know this; and would that few of you knew it. But few of you know
Editors' notes and page, col. 1135

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1135

¹ In veteribus libris, corcodrilli.

In the old books, "corcodrilli" (crocodiles).

(printed under page 574)

(2) ‹anchor: Hoc solum malo suo› · call in col 1135

² Sic manuscripti. At editi, mali sui.

So the manuscripts. But the printed editions have "mali sui" (of their own evil).

(printed under page 574)

Page

  • running head: 1135 S. AUGUSTINI EPISC[...] (cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1136
in libris, multi in theatris, quia Aeneas descendit ad inferos, et ostendit illi pater suus animas Romanorum magnorum venturas in corpora: expavit ipse Aeneas, et ait:
in books, many in theatres, that Aeneas descended to the underworld, and his father showed him the souls of great Romans who were to come into bodies: Aeneas himself was terrified, and said:
O pater, anne aliquas ad coelum hinc ire putandum est Sublimes animas, iterumque ad tarda reverti Corpora?
O father, is it to be thought that some souls go hence on high to heaven, and return again to sluggish bodies?
Credendumne est, inquit, quod eant ad coelum, et iterum redeant?
Is it to be believed, he says, that they go to heaven, and come back again?
Quae lucis miseris tam dira cupido? (Virgil. Aeneid., lib. 6, vers. 719-721.)
What so dire a longing for the light do the wretched have? (Virgil, Aeneid, book 6, lines 719-721.)
Melius filius intelligebat, quam pater exponebat. Reprehendit cupiditatem animarum rursus in corpora redire volentium. Dixit diram cupiditatem, dixit eas miseras; nec erubuit eas. Ad hoc, philosophi, perduxistis, ut purgentur animae, perveniant ad summam munditiam, et per ipsam munditiam obliviscantur omnia, et per obliviones miseriarum redeant ad miserias corporum. Dicite, obsecro: nonne haec etiam si vera essent, melius nescirentur? Etiam si vera essent, inquam, quae sine dubio falsa, quia foeda sunt; nonne melius nescirentur? An forte dicturus es mihi: Non eris sapiens, si ista nescieris? Utquid illa sciam? Possumne esse modo melior, quam tunc ero in coelo? Si in coelo, quando ero melior et perfectior, obliviscar omnia quae hic didici, et haec ibi melior nesciturus sum; sine me modo illa nescire. In coelo habitantem dicis omnia obliviscentem: sine in terra esse horum omnium nescientem. Deinde, rogo te, sciunt se istae animae in coelo, passuras esse rursus hujus vitae miserias, an nesciunt? Elige quod volueris. Si sciunt se passuras esse tantas miserias, quomodo sunt beatae, miserias suas futuras cogitantes? quomodo sunt beatae, ubi sunt sine securitate? Sed video quid eligas: dicturus es, Nesciunt. Laudas ergo ibi hanc ignorantiam, quam me nunc habere non sinis, docendo me in terra, quod me nesciturum dicis in coelo. Nesciunt, inquis. Si nesciunt, et non se putant esse passuras, errando sunt beatae. Quod enim passurae sunt, putant se non passuras: quod falsum putare, quid est aliud quam errare? Erunt ergo errore felices; erunt beatae; non aeternitate, sed falsitate. Liberet nos veritas, ut vere beati esse possimus: quoniam no⟨n⟩ vacat sermo Redemptoris nostri, Si vos Filius liberaverit, tunc vere liberi eritis. Ipse enim dixit: Si manseritis in verbo meo, vere discipuli mei eritis; et cognoscetis veritatem, et veritas liberabit vos (Joan. VIII, 36, 31, 32).
The son understood better than the father was explaining. He rebukes the desire of souls wishing to return again into bodies. He called it a dire desire, he called them wretched; and he did not blush for them. To this, philosophers, you have brought it: that souls are purged, reach the highest purity, and through that very purity forget all things, and through forgetfulness of miseries return to the miseries of bodies. Tell me, I beseech you: even if these things were true, would they not be better not known? Even if they were true, I say, though without doubt they are false, because they are foul; would they not be better not known? Or perhaps you are going to say to me: You will not be wise if you do not know these things? Why should I know them? Can I now be better than I shall be then in heaven? If in heaven, when I shall be better and more perfect, I shall forget all that I have learned here, and being better there I am going not to know these things; let me not know them now. You say that the one dwelling in heaven forgets all things: let me on earth be ignorant of all of them. Next, I ask you, do these souls in heaven know that they are going to suffer again the miseries of this life, or do they not know? Choose which you like. If they know that they are going to suffer such great miseries, how are they blessed, while thinking about their future miseries? how are they blessed, where they are without security? But I see what you choose: you are going to say, They do not know. So you praise this ignorance there, which you do not allow me to have now, by teaching me on earth what you say I shall not know in heaven. They do not know, you say. If they do not know, and do not think that they are going to suffer, they are blessed by erring. For what they are going to suffer, they think they will not suffer: and to think what is false, what else is it than to err? So they will be happy by error; they will be blessed; not by eternity, but by falsity. May the truth set us free, so that we may be truly blessed: since the word of our Redeemer is not empty, If the Son sets you free, then you will be truly free. For He Himself said: If you abide in My word, you will truly be My disciples; and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free (John 8:36, 31, 32).
CAPUT VI. — 6. Spes hic esset felicior quam in illa felicitate. Deinde audite aliud pejus, aliud dolendum vel potius irridendum. Hic sapiens, hic philosophe, hoc est, in terra (verbi gratia, Pythagoras, Plato, Porphyrius, et nescio quis alius ipsorum), quare philosopharis? Propter vitam, inquit, beatam. Quando habebis istam vitam beatam? Cum hoc corpus, inquit, reliquero in terra. Modo ergo misera vita geritur, sed spes est beatae vitae: ibi beata vita geritur, sed spes est miserae vitae. Ergo spes nostrae infelicitatis
Chapter VI. — 6. Hope here would be happier than in that happiness. Next hear something worse, something to be lamented or rather to be laughed at. You wise man here, you philosopher here, that is, on earth (for example, Pythagoras, Plato, Porphyry, and I know not what other of them), why do you philosophize? For the sake of the blessed life, he says. When will you have this blessed life? When I have left this body on earth, he says. So now a wretched life is led, but there is hope of a blessed life: there a blessed life is led, but there is hope of a wretched life. Therefore the hope of our unhappiness
Editors' notes and page, col. 1136

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: non vacat sermo› · call in col 1136

¹ Lov., non fraudat nos sermo; dissentientibus caeteris libris.

Louvain: "non fraudat nos sermo" (the word does not cheat us); the other books disagree.

(printed under page 574)

Page

  • running head: [A]UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 1136 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1137
est felix, et felicitatis infelix. Abjiciamus haec, et vel rideamus quia falsa sunt, vel doleamus quia magna existimantur. Sunt enim ista, fratres mei, magna magnorum deliramenta doctorum. Quanto melius tenemus magna magnorum sacramenta sanctorum? Amore corporum dicunt redire animas purgatas, mundatas, sapientes, purgatas animas amore corporum redire ad corpora. Ergo anima purgata sic amat? Nonne amor iste magnae sunt sordes?
is happy, and that of happiness unhappy. Let us cast these things away, and either laugh because they are false, or grieve because they are thought great. For these, my brothers, are the great ravings of great doctors. How much better do we hold the great mysteries of the great saints? They say that souls purged, cleansed, wise, return out of love of bodies: that purged souls return to bodies out of love of bodies. So does a purged soul love in this way? Is not that love great filth?
CAPUT VII. — 7. Porphyrii sententia de fugiendo omni corpore. Refellitur. Sed corpus est omne fugiendum. Magnus eorum philosophus posterius Porphyrius, fidei christianae acerrimus inimicus, qui jam christianis temporibus fuit; sed tamen ab ipsis deliramentis erubescendo, a Christianis ex aliqua parte correptus, dixit, scripsit: Corpus est omne fugiendum. Omne dixit, quasi omne corpus vinculum aerumnosum sit animae. Et prorsus si corpus qualecumque est fugiendum, non est ut laudes ei corpus, et dicas quomodo Deo docente fides nostra laudat corpus: quia et corpus quod modo habemus, quamvis habeamus hinc poenam de peccato, et corpus quod corrumpitur, aggravet animam (Sap. IX, 15); tamen habet corpus istud speciem suam, dispositionem membrorum, distinctionem sensuum, erectam staturam, et caetera quae bene considerantes stupent. Verumtamen illud omnino incorruptibile, omnino immortale, omnino ad movendum agile et facile erit. Sed ait Porphyrius: Sine causa mihi laudas corpus; qualecumque sit corpus, si vult esse beata anima, corpus est omne fugiendum. Hoc dicunt philosophi: sed errant, sed delirant. Cito probo: nolo diutius disputare; quia illa quae praedicata est debet habere subditum. Duo enim sunt invicem sibi connexa, praedicata et subdita. Superat omnia Deus: huic cuncta sunt subdita. Et anima si habet aliquem honorem apud Deum, debet habere aliquid subditum. Sed nolo hinc diutius disputare, libros vestros lego: mundum istum animal dicitis, id est, coelum, terram, maria, omnia quae sunt ingentia corpora, immensa usquequaque elementa; totum hoc, universumque corpus, quod ex his elementis omnibus constat, dicitis esse animal magnum, id est, habere animam suam, sed sensus corporis non habere; quia extrinsecus nihil est quod sentiri possit: habere tamen intellectum, haerere Deo: et ipsam animam mundi vocari Jovem, vel vocari Hecatem, id est, quasi animam universalem mundum regentem, et unum quoddam animal facientem. Eumdemque mundum aeternum esse dicitis, semper futurum, finem non habiturum. Si ergo aeternus est mundus, et sine fine manet mundus, et animal est mundus; anima ista semper tenetur in mundo: certe corpus est omne fugiendum? Quid est quod dicebas, Corpus est omne fugiendum? Ego dico beatas animas incorruptibilia corpora semper
Chapter VII. — 7. The opinion of Porphyry about fleeing every body. It is refuted. But, [they say,] every body is to be fled. Their great philosopher of later times, Porphyry, a most bitter enemy of the Christian faith, who lived already in Christian times, yet who, blushing at those very ravings and corrected in some measure by the Christians, said, wrote: Every body is to be fled. He said "every", as if every body were a wretched chain of the soul. And indeed, if a body of whatever kind is to be fled, there is no point in your praising the body to him, and telling him how, with God teaching, our faith praises the body: because even the body which we have now, although we have from it a punishment for sin, and the body which is corrupted weighs down the soul (Wis. 9:15), yet this body has its own beauty, the arrangement of its members, the distinction of its senses, its upright stature, and the other things at which those who consider them well are amazed. That [body], however, will be wholly incorruptible, wholly immortal, wholly nimble and easy in moving. But Porphyry says: Without cause do you praise the body to me; whatever kind of body it may be, if the soul wishes to be blessed, every body is to be fled. This is what the philosophers say: but they err, but they rave. I prove it quickly: I do not wish to dispute at length; because that which has been extolled must have something subject to it. For these two are connected with one another, the extolled and the subject. God surpasses all things: to Him all things are subject. And the soul, if it has any honour with God, must have something subject to it. But I do not wish to dispute on this at greater length; I read your books: you say that this world is a living being, that is, the heaven, the earth, the seas, all the things that are huge bodies, elements immense on every side; all this, and the universal body which is made up of all these elements, you say is a great living being, that is, that it has its own soul, but does not have bodily senses, because outside it there is nothing that could be perceived: yet that it has understanding, that it cleaves to God: and that this very soul of the world is called Jupiter, or is called Hecate, that is, as it were the universal soul ruling the world and making it one single living being. And you say that this same world is eternal, will always be, will have no end. If therefore the world is eternal, and the world remains without end, and the world is a living being, that soul is always held in the world: is every body surely to be fled? What is it that you were saying, Every body is to be fled? I say that blessed souls, incorruptible bodies always
Editors' notes and page, col. 1137

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1137

¹ Abest, posterius, ab Er. Lugd. Ven. Lov. M.

The second [occurrence] is absent from Erasmus, Lyons, Venice and Louvain. M.

(printed under page 575)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1137

² Er. Lugd. et Ven., Et prorsus si corpus qualecumque est fugiendum, non est ut laudes ejus corpus. Lov., non est ut laudes ei corpus. M.

Erasmus, Lyons and Venice: "Et prorsus si corpus qualecumque est fugiendum, non est ut laudes ejus corpus" (And indeed if every body whatever is to be fled, there is no reason for you to praise its body). Louvain: "non est ut laudes ei corpus" (there is no reason for you to praise the body to him). M.

(printed under page 575)

(a) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1137

(printed under page 575) (a) Alias, de Tempore 147

Otherwise numbered: On the Season 147.

(printed under page 575)

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXLII. (column number 1137 at left)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)