Migne Reading Room

PL 38 · cols. 1138–1142

Augustine, Sermones 234-243 (Classis II, de Tempore)

Sermon CCXLII

PL 38:1138
habituras. Tu qui dicis, Corpus est omne fugiendum, occide mundum. Tu dicis ut fugiam de carne mea: fugiat Jupiter tuus de coelo et terra.
are going to have. You who say, "Every body is to be fled from," kill the world. You say that I should flee from my flesh: let your Jupiter flee from heaven and earth.
CAPUT VIII. — 8. Rursum ex Platonis verbis confutatur. Quid quod invenimus eumdem Platonem, magistrum istorum omnium, in libro quodam suo quem scripsit de constitutione mundi, inducere Deum fabricatorem deorum, facientem scilicet deos coelestes, stellas omnes, solem et lunam? Dicit ergo Deum opificem deorum coelestium: dicit ipsas stellas habere animas intellectuales, quae intelligunt Deum, et corpora visibilia quae cernuntur. Dico, ut intelligatis: Sol iste quem videtis, non videretur, nisi corpus esset: hoc verum est. Stella ulla vel luna non videretur, nisi corpus esset: verum dicit. Ideo dicit et Apostolus: Et corpora coelestia, et corpora terrestria. Et sequitur: Alia gloria caelestium, alia et terrestrium. Et rursus dicens de gloria coelestium corporum Apostolus adjunxit, et ait: Alia gloria solis, alia gloria lunae, alia gloria stellarum. Stella enim ab stella differt in gloria: sic et resurrectio mortuorum (I Cor. XV, 40-42). Videtis quia promissa est sanctorum corporibus claritas, et diversa species claritatis, quia diversa sunt merita charitatis. Sed illi quid dicunt? Stellae istae quas videtis, corpora quidem sunt, sed habent suas animas intellectuales, et sunt dii. Interim de corporibus, quia corpora sunt, verum dicunt: sed utrum habeant animas suas, utquid discutio? Modo veniamus ad rem. Inducitur Deus a Platone ipso alloqui deos, quos fecit de corporali et de incorporali substantia, atque inter caetera dicere illis: « Quoniam estis orti, immortales esse et indissolubiles non potestis. » Jam ad istam vocem illi intremiscere poterant. Quare? Quia immortales esse cupiebant, et mori nolebant. Ergo ut eis auferret timorem, secutus adjunxit atque ait: « Non tamen dissolvemini, neque vos ulla mortis fata periment, nec erunt valentiora, quam consilium meum, quod majus est vinculum ad perpetuitatem vestram, quam illa quibus colligati estis. » Ecce Deus dat securitatem diis a se factis: securitatem illis dat immortalitatis; securitatem illis dat, quod non relinquant globos corporum suorum. Certe corpus est omne fugiendum? Quantum existimo, responsum est illis, sicut intelligere potestis: sicut et nos loqui possumus, quantum hora sermonis permittit, quantum vestra capacitas sinit, responsum est eis. Jamvero quid et ipsi dicant de resurrectione corporum quasi acute, ut non eis, sicut arbitrantur, etiam nos respondere possimus, multum est ut hodie vobis dicam. Sed quia semel promisi vobis, per istos dies istam de resurrectione carnis quaestionem esse versandam, ad ea quae restant, adjuvante Domino, et aures et corda in crastinum praeparate.
Chapter VIII. — 8. He is refuted again from Plato's own words. What of the fact that we find this same Plato, the master of all these men, in a certain book of his which he wrote on the constitution of the world, bringing in God as the maker of the gods, that is, as making the heavenly gods, all the stars, the sun and the moon? He says, then, that God is the craftsman of the heavenly gods; he says that the stars themselves have intellectual souls, which understand God, and visible bodies, which are seen. I say, so that you may understand: this sun which you see would not be seen if it were not a body; this is true. No star or moon would be seen if it were not a body; he speaks the truth. That is why the Apostle too says: And heavenly bodies, and earthly bodies. And it follows: The glory of the heavenly is one thing, and that of the earthly another. And again, speaking of the glory of the heavenly bodies, the Apostle added, and said: One is the glory of the sun, another the glory of the moon, another the glory of the stars. For star differs from star in glory: so also is the resurrection of the dead (1 Cor. 15:40–42). You see that brightness has been promised to the bodies of the saints, and differing kinds of brightness, because the merits of charity differ. But what do those men say? These stars which you see are indeed bodies, but they have their own intellectual souls, and they are gods. Meanwhile, about the bodies, that they are bodies, they speak the truth; but whether they have their own souls, why should I discuss? Now let us come to the point. God is brought in by Plato himself addressing the gods whom He made of bodily and of bodiless substance, and among other things saying to them: "Since you have come into being, you cannot be immortal and indissoluble." At that utterance they could already tremble. Why? Because they desired to be immortal, and did not wish to die. So, to take away their fear, He went on and added, and said: "Yet you will not be dissolved, nor will any fates of death destroy you, nor will they be stronger than My counsel, which is a greater bond for your perpetuity than those by which you are bound together." See, God gives security to the gods made by Himself: He gives them the security of immortality; He gives them the security that they will not leave the globes of their bodies. Surely every body is to be fled from? As far as I judge, they have been answered, as you are able to understand: as we too are able to speak, as far as the hour of the sermon allows, as far as your capacity permits, they have been answered. But now, what they too say, as if shrewdly, about the resurrection of bodies, so that, as they think, we may not be able to answer them as well, is too much for me to tell you today. But since I promised you once that during these days this question of the resurrection of the flesh would be dealt with, prepare both your ears and your hearts for tomorrow, for what remains, with the Lord's help.
SERMO CCXLII. In diebus Paschalibus, XIII. De Resurrectione corporum, contra Gentiles.
Sermon 242. On the Days of Easter, 13. On the Resurrection of Bodies, against the Gentiles.
CAPUT PRIMUM. — 1. Resurrectionis fides manifesto
Chapter One. — 1. Faith in the resurrection manifestly
Editors' notes and page, col. 1138

Footnotes

(a) Vide de Civitate Dei lib. 22, cap. 26.

See The City of God, book 22, chapter 26.

(*) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXLII (no asterisk printed in the heading)› · call in col 1138 * Emendatus ad duos cb. ad d. gr. r. t. v. vd. et ad Am. Er. Par. Lov.

Emended against two cb. [manuscripts], against d. gr. r. t. v. vd., and against the Amerbach, Erasmus, Paris and Louvain editions.

(printed under page 575)

(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXLII› · call in col 1138

(printed under page 575)

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXLII. 1138
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: ligature doubt raised by the check (text not changed): caelestium | coelestium
PL 38:1139
probata, imprudenter ab hominibus impugnatur. Diebus his sanctis resurrectioni Domini dedicatis, quantum donante ipso possumus, de carnis resurrectione tractemus. Haec enim fides est nostra, hoc donum in Domini nostri Jesu Christi nobis carne promissum est, et in ipso praecessit exemplum. Voluit enim nobis quod promisit in fine, non solum praenuntiare, sed etiam demonstrare. Illi quidem qui tunc fuerunt cum illo, viderunt, et cum expavescerent, et spiritum se videre crederent, soliditatem corporis tenuerunt. Locutus est enim non solum verbis ad aures eorum, sed etiam specie ad oculos eorum: parumque erat se praebere cernendum, nisi etiam offerret pertractandum atque palpandum. Ait enim: Quid turbati estis, et cogitationes ascendunt in cor vestrum? Putaverunt enim se spiritum videre. « Quid turbati estis, inquit, et cogitationes ascendunt in cor vestrum? Videte manus meas et pedes meos: palpate, et videte, quia spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, sicut me videtis habere. » Contra istam evidentiam disputant homines. Quid enim aliud facerent homines, qui ea quae sunt hominum sapiunt, quam disputarent de Deo contra Deum? Ille enim Deus est, illi homines sunt. Sed Deus novit cogitationes hominum, quoniam vanae sunt (Psal. XCIII, 11). In homine carnali tota regula intelligendi est consuetudo cernendi. Quod solent videre, credunt: quod non solent, non credunt. Praeter consuetudinem facit Deus miracula, quia Deus est. Majora quidem miracula sunt, tot quotidie homines nasci qui non erant, quam paucos resurrexisse qui erant: et tamen ista miracula non consideratione comprehensa sunt, sed assiduitate viluerunt. Resurrexit Christus, absoluta res est. Corpus erat, caro erat, pependit in cruce, emisit animam, posita est in sepulcro. Exhibuit illam vivam, qui vivebat in illa. Quare miramur? Quare non credimus? Deus est qui fecit: considera auctorem, et tolle dubitationem.
proven, is imprudently attacked by men. In these holy days dedicated to the resurrection of the Lord, let us treat of the resurrection of the flesh, so far as we are able by His gift. For this is our faith; this gift has been promised to us in the flesh of our Lord Jesus Christ, and in Him the example has gone before. For He willed not only to foretell to us what He promised at the end, but also to demonstrate it. Those indeed who were with Him at that time saw, and when they were terrified and believed that they were seeing a spirit, they held the solidity of a body. For He spoke not only with words to their ears, but also with His appearance to their eyes; and it was too little to offer Himself to be seen, unless He also offered Himself to be handled and felt. For He says: Why are you troubled, and why do thoughts rise up into your heart? For they thought that they were seeing a spirit. "Why are you troubled," He says, "and why do thoughts rise up into your heart? See My hands and My feet: feel, and see, that a spirit does not have bones and flesh, as you see that I have." Against this evidence men dispute. For what else would men do, who savour the things that are of men, than dispute about God against God? For He is God, they are men. But God knows the thoughts of men, that they are vain (Ps. 93:11). In the carnal man the whole rule of understanding is the habit of seeing. What they are accustomed to see, they believe; what they are not accustomed to see, they do not believe. God works miracles beyond what is customary, because He is God. Indeed, that so many men who were not are born every day are greater miracles than that a few who were have risen again; and yet these miracles are not grasped by consideration, but have grown cheap through constant repetition. Christ has risen; the matter is settled. There was a body, there was flesh; He hung on the cross, He gave up His soul, [the flesh] was laid in the sepulchre. He Who lived in it showed it alive. Why do we marvel? Why do we not believe? It is God Who did it: consider the author, and put away doubt.
CAPUT II. — 2. Contra resurrectionem carnis obtendunt, Si corruptio non erit, cur manducabitur? Quaerunt ergo homines, utrum corruptio ista corporis, quam sentiunt in carne sua, futura sit in resurrectione mortuorum. Dicimus non futuram. Respondent nobis: Si corruptio non erit, quare manducabitur? Aut si non manducabitur, quare post resurrectionem Dominus manducavit? Modo Evangelium cum legeretur, audivimus, quia cum exhiberet se vivum oculis manibusque discipulorum suorum, parum illi visum est ad demonstrandam evidentiam corporalem: sed addidit, Habetis hic aliquid quod manducetur? Et obtulerunt ei partem piscis assi, et favum mellis: et manducavit, et reliquias dedit illis (Luc. XXIV, 37-43). Dicitur ergo nobis: Si corruptio corporis non resurget, quare manducavit Dominus Christus? Legistis quia manducavit, numquid legistis quia esurivit? Quod manducavit, potestatis fuit, non egestatis. Si desideraret manducare, egeret. Rursus si manducare non posset,
Chapter II. — 2. Against the resurrection of the flesh they put forward: If there will be no corruption, why will there be eating? So men ask whether this corruption of the body, which they feel in their flesh, will exist in the resurrection of the dead. We say that it will not. They answer us: If there will be no corruption, why will there be eating? Or if there will be no eating, why did the Lord eat after the resurrection? Just now, when the Gospel was being read, we heard that when He was showing Himself alive to the eyes and hands of His disciples, it seemed to Him too little for demonstrating the bodily evidence, but He added: Have you here anything to be eaten? And they offered Him a part of a roasted fish, and a honeycomb; and He ate, and gave the remains to them (Luke 24:37–43). So it is said to us: If the corruption of the body does not rise again, why did the Lord Christ eat? You have read that He ate; have you read that He was hungry? That He ate was a matter of power, not of need. If He had desired to eat, He would have been in need. Again, if He could not eat,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1139

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: posita est› · call in col 1139

¹ Subaudi, caro. — Quam vocem exprimunt Er. Lugd. Ven. et Lov. M.

Understand "caro" (flesh). — Erasmus, Lyons, Venice and Louvain print that word. M.

(printed under page 576)

Page

  • running head: 1139 S. AUGUSTINI EPIS (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1140
minus valeret. Numquid et Angeli, quando suscepti sunt hospitio a patribus nostris, non manducaverunt (Gen. XVIII, 1-9, et Tob. XII, 19), et tamen corruptibiles non fuerunt?
He would have been less strong. Did not the Angels too, when they were received in hospitality by our fathers, eat (Gen. 18:1–9, and Tob. 12:19), and yet they were not corruptible?
3. Si carnis vitia non resurgent, cur in Christo cicatrices. Rursus dicunt: Resurgent vitia, quae erant in corpore humano, cum quibus moritur homo? Respondemus: Non resurgent vitia. Et dicitur nobis: Quare ergo Dominus cum suorum vulnerum cicatricibus resurrexit? Quid ad hoc dicimus, nisi quia et hoc potestatis fuit, non necessitatis? Sic resurgere voluit, sic se voluit quibusdam dubitantibus exhibere. In illa carne cicatrix vulneris, sanavit vulnus incredulitatis.
3. If the defects of the flesh will not rise again, why the scars in Christ. Again they say: Will the defects that were in the human body, with which a man dies, rise again? We answer: The defects will not rise again. And it is said to us: Why then did the Lord rise again with the scars of His wounds? What do we say to this, except that this too was a matter of power, not of necessity? So He willed to rise again, so He willed to show Himself to certain who doubted. In that flesh the scar of a wound healed the wound of unbelief.
CAPUT III. — 4. Parvulorum resurrectio qualis. Adhuc disputant, et quaerunt a nobis: Parvuli qui moriuntur, parvuli resurrecturi sunt? an aetas erit plena reviviscentium, quorum erat parva morientium? Hoc quidem in Scripturis definitum non invenimus. Incorruptibilia corpora et immortalia resurrectura promissa sunt. Sed si parva aetas redditur, si statura pusilla revocatur, numquid et propterea infirmitas revocatur? Si parvi erunt, numquid jacebunt, et ambulare non poterunt? Credibilius tamen accipitur et probabilius et rationabilius, plenas aetates resurrecturas, ut reddatur munere, quod accessurum erat tempore. Non enim credituri sumus etiam senectam resurrecturam anhelam et curvam. Postremo corruptionem tolle, et quod vis adde.
Chapter III. — 4. Of what kind the resurrection of little ones is. They still dispute, and ask of us: Will little ones who die rise again as little ones? Or will the age of those coming back to life be full, whose age was small when they died? This indeed we do not find defined in the Scriptures. It is promised that bodies will rise again incorruptible and immortal. But if a small age is given back, if a tiny stature is called back, is weakness also called back on that account? If they are to be small, will they lie down, and be unable to walk? Yet it is accepted as more credible, and more probable and more reasonable, that ages will rise again full, so that there may be given back by gift what was going to be added by time. For we are not going to believe that old age too will rise again, short of breath and bent. In short, take away corruption, and add what you will.
5. Terrenum corpus quomodo in coelo erit. Sed, inquis, quomodo erit terrenum corpus in coelo? Philosophi enim Gentium, illi valde magni, quorum vobis jam vel insanas vel certe humanas sententias intimavi (quaesierunt quippe ista non spiritu Dei, sed conjectura cordis humani); hinc maxime faciunt quaestionem, tractant subtiliter de momentis ponderum et ordine elementorum: et dicunt, quod etiam videmus, mundum sic esse dispositum, ut ima sit terra tanquam in fundo ejus, secunda aqua superfundatur terrae, tertius aer veniat, quartus aether cuncta cooperiat. Illud elementum supernum, quod aethera appellant, ignem dicunt esse liquidum et purum, inde sidera esse formata, ibi nihil posse esse terrenum, quoniam ordo ponderum non admittit. Si dicamus eis nostra corpora in terra nova esse victura, et in coelo non futura; audacter et temere, ⟨im⟩o infideliter dicimus. Credere enim debemus talia corpora nos habituros, ut ubi velimus, quando voluerimus, ibi simus. Nam si respondemus, ad solvendam de ordine ponderum quaestionem, in terra nos esse victuros; de ipso corpore Domini nobis est quaestio, cum quo ascendit in coelum.
5. How an earthly body will be in heaven. But, you say, how will an earthly body be in heaven? For the philosophers of the Gentiles, those very great men, whose opinions, whether senseless or at any rate human, I have already made known to you (for they sought these things not by the Spirit of God, but by the conjecture of the human heart), raise their question chiefly from this: they treat subtly of the moments of weights and the order of the elements; and they say, what we too see, that the world is so arranged that earth is lowest, as it were at its bottom, second water is poured over the earth, third comes air, fourth the aether covers all things. That uppermost element, which they call aether, they say is fire, clear and pure, that from it the stars were formed, that there nothing can be earthly, since the order of weights does not allow it. If we were to tell them that our bodies will live on a new earth and will not be in heaven, we speak boldly and rashly, nay unfaithfully. For we ought to believe that we shall have such bodies that where we wish, when we have wished, there we shall be. For if we answer, in order to resolve the question about the order of weights, that we shall live on earth, then the question for us concerns the very body of the Lord, with which He ascended into heaven.
CAPUT IV. — 6. Christi corpus in coelo. Audistis quod de Evangelio modo recens sonuit in auribus nostris: Elevatis manibus suis benedixit eis. Et factum est, dum benediceret eis, recessit ab eis, et ferebatur in coelum (Luc. XXIV, 50 et 51). Qui ferebatur in coelum? Dominus Christus. Qui Dominus Christus? Dominus Jesus. Quid enim, separaturus es hominem a Deo, et facturus es aliam personam Dei, aliam hominis, ut jam non sit T⟨r⟩initas, sed quaternitas? Quomodo tu
Chapter IV. — 6. The body of Christ in heaven. You have heard what sounded just now, freshly, in our ears from the Gospel: Having lifted up His hands, He blessed them. And it came to pass, while He was blessing them, He withdrew from them, and was carried into heaven (Luke 24:50–51). Who was carried into heaven? The Lord Christ. Which Lord Christ? The Lord Jesus. For what, are you going to separate the man from God, and make one person of God, another of the man, so that it is no longer a Trinity, but a quaternity? Just as you,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1140

Page

  • running head: UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 1140 (start of head cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1141
homo anima es et corpus; sic Dominus Christus Verbum, anima et corpus. Sed Verbum non recessit a Patre: et ad nos venit, et Patrem non deseruit; et in utero carnem accepit, et mundum rexit. Quid ergo levatum est in coelum, nisi quod sumptum est de terra? id est, caro illa, corpus illud, de quo loquens ad discipulos ait: Palpate, et videte, quia spiritus ossa et carnem non habet, sicut me videtis habere. Credamus hoc, fratres: et si argumenta philosophorum difficile solvimus; illud quod demonstratum est in Domino, sine difficultate fidei teneamus. Illi garriant, nos credamus.
a man, are soul and body; so the Lord Christ is the Word, soul and body. But the Word did not withdraw from the Father: He both came to us and did not forsake the Father; He both received flesh in the womb and ruled the world. What, then, was raised up into heaven, if not what was taken from the earth? That is, that flesh, that body, of which He says, speaking to the disciples: Handle and see, for a spirit does not have bones and flesh, as you see Me have. Let us believe this, brothers: and if we have difficulty refuting the arguments of the philosophers, let us hold without difficulty of faith what was demonstrated in the Lord. Let them chatter; let us believe.
CAPUT V. — 7. Deo volente fit quod alias fieri non potest. Sed non potest, inquiunt, esse terrenum corpus in coelo. Quid, si hoc velit Deus? Responde contra Deum, et dic: Non potest Deus. Nonne et tu quicumque paganus, dicis omnipotentem Deum? Nonne in libro Platonis, quod hesterno die demonstravi (In superiore sermone, n. 8), legitur dixisse Deus non factus diis a se factis: « Quoniam estis orti, immortales quidem esse et indissolubiles non potestis; non tamen dissolvemini, neque ulla vos mortis fata periment; nec erunt valentiora quam consilium meum, quod majus est vinculum ad perpetuitatem vestram, quam illa quibus estis colligati? » Totum ad voluntatem suam redegit Deus, qui potest et quod impossibile est. Nam quid est aliud, Non potestis esse immortales, sed ut non moriamini ego facio; nisi, et quod fieri non potest, ego facio?
Chapter V. — 7. By the will of God that comes about which otherwise cannot come about. But, they say, an earthly body cannot be in heaven. What if God wills this? Answer against God, and say: God cannot. Do you not also, whatever pagan you are, call God omnipotent? Is it not read in the book of Plato, which I showed yesterday (In the preceding sermon, n. 8), that the unmade God said to the gods made by Himself: « Since you have come into being, you cannot indeed be immortal and indissoluble; yet you will not be dissolved, nor will any fates of death destroy you; nor will they be stronger than My counsel, which is a greater bond for your perpetuity than those by which you are bound together? » God has brought everything under His will, He Who can do even what is impossible. For what else does it mean, You cannot be immortal, but I bring it about that you do not die, if not, I do even what cannot be done?
CAPUT VI. — 8. Corporum ordo ex diversitate ponderum. Terrenum corpus contra ponderum ordinem super aquam. Volo tamen aliquid etiam de diversitate ponderum disputare. Rogo te, dic mihi, Terra terra est, Aqua aqua est, Aer aer est, Aether, id est coelum, et ignis ille liquidus coelum est. Quatuor nempe ista quasi gradatim construxerunt et aedificaverunt mundum, hoc est, ex his quatuor aedificatus est mundus. Quaere quid in imo sit, terra est: quid desuper, aqua est: quid super aquam, aer est: quid super aerem, coelum est, aether est. Quid corpora solida quae tenentur atque tractantur? Non humida dico, quae labuntur et fluunt; corpora dico tractabilia, unde sunt? Terrae deputanda sunt, an aquae, an aeri, an aetheri? Responsurus es, Terrae. Terrenum ergo corpus est lignum? Plane terrenum. In terra nascitur, in terra alitur, in terra crescit. Tractabile est, non fluxibile. Redi mecum ad illum ordinem ponderum. Terra in fundamento est: ordinem sequere. Quid super terram? Aqua. Quare lignum natat super aquam? Terrenum est corpus: si revoces ad illum ordinem ponderum, sub aqua esse debuit, non supra. Invenimus inter terram et lignum aquam mediam: subter terram, super aquam, et super aquam iterum terram, quandoquidem lignum terra est. Perdidisti illum ordinem,
Chapter VI. — 8. The order of bodies from the difference of weights. An earthly body upon water, against the order of weights. Yet I wish also to discuss something concerning the difference of weights. I ask you, tell me: Earth is earth, Water is water, Air is air, Aether, that is heaven, and that liquid fire is heaven. These four, namely, built and constructed the world as if by steps; that is, from these four the world was built. Ask what is at the bottom: it is earth; what is above: it is water; what is above water: it is air; what is above air: it is heaven, it is aether. What of solid bodies, which are held and handled? I do not mean moist ones, which slip and flow; I mean tangible bodies: whence are they? Are they to be assigned to earth, or to water, or to air, or to aether? You will answer, To earth. Is wood, then, an earthly body? Plainly earthly. It is born in earth, it is nourished in earth, it grows in earth. It is tangible, not fluid. Return with me to that order of weights. Earth is at the foundation: follow the order. What is above earth? Water. Why does wood float on water? It is an earthly body: if you refer it to that order of weights, it ought to have been under water, not above. We find water in the middle between earth and wood: earth below, water above, and above the water earth again, since wood is earth. You have lost that order,
Editors' notes and page, col. 1141

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1141

¹ Sic Mss. At editi, Quomodo tu homo anima es et corpus, et sicut anima et corpus unus est homo; ita Deus et homo unus est Christus. Sed Verbum, etc.

So the manuscripts. But the printed editions: "Quomodo tu homo anima es et corpus, et sicut anima et corpus unus est homo; ita Deus et homo unus est Christus. Sed Verbum" (As you, a man, are soul and body, and as soul and body are one man, so God and man are one Christ. But the Word), etc.

(printed under page 577)

(2) ‹anchor: quasi gradatim› · call in col 1141

² Sic aliquot manuscripti. Alii vero cum editis, ista gravida.

So some manuscripts. Others, with the printed editions, have "ista gravida" (these heavy things).

(printed under page 577)

(a) ‹anchor: quibus estis colligati› · call in col 1141

(printed under page 577) (a) Vide de Civitate Dei lib. 22, cap. 26.

See The City of God, book 22, chapter 26.

(printed under page 577)

Page

  • running head: 1141 SERMO CCXLII.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1142
tene fidem. Ergo terrena corpora inventa sunt super elementum, quod secundum est in ordine elementorum, quando natant ligna, neque merguntur.
hold to the faith. Therefore earthly bodies have been found above the element which is second in the order of the elements, when pieces of wood float and do not sink.
CAPUT VII. — 9. Plumbum super aquam. Attende aliud, quod plus mireris. Corpora ipsa gravissima, et tamen terrena, quae mox ut dimissa fuerint super aquam, continuo demerguntur, et ad ima profunda perveniunt, sicut est ferrum, postremo sicut est plumbum. Quid enim plumbo gravius? Accedit tamen manus artificis ad plumbum, facit inde aliquod vas concavum, et natat plumbum super aquam. Ergone non dabit Deus corpori meo, quod dat artifex plumbo? Deinde aquam ipsam ubi ponitis? Redite ad ordinem elementorum. Certe respondebitis, quod aqua sit super terram. Quare ergo antequam currant in terra, pendent nubibus flumina?
Chapter VII. — 9. Lead upon water. Consider something else, at which you may marvel more. The very heaviest bodies, and yet earthly, which as soon as they have been let go upon water immediately sink and reach the lowest depths, as iron does, and finally as lead does. For what is heavier than lead? Yet the hand of a craftsman comes to the lead, makes from it some hollow vessel, and the lead floats upon the water. Will God then not give to my body what a craftsman gives to lead? Next, where do you place water itself? Go back to the order of the elements. Certainly you will answer that water is above earth. Why then, before they run upon the earth, do rivers hang in the clouds?
10. Corporum graviorum celerior quorumdam motus. Revoca inde considerationem tuam et cogitationem ad ea quae dicturus sum, si Domino adjuvante potuero. Quid facilius movetur, quid velocius agitatur, gravius corpus, an levius? Quis non respondeat, Levius? Leviora enim corpora facilius moventur, velocius aguntur: graviora difficilius atque tardius. Certe regulam fixisti, certe considerasti, et circumspectis omnibus respondisti quia facilius moventur et velocius aguntur corpora leviora, quam graviora. Ita est, dicis. Responde ergo mihi. Quare levissima aranea tarde se movet, et gravis equus velociter currit? De ipsis hominibus loquar: majus corpus hominis gravius est; brevius corpus quod minus habet ponderis, levius est. Ita vero est, sed si alius portet. Si autem ipse homo corpus suum portet, validus currit, macer languore vix ambulat. Appende macrum et robustum hominem; illum languore vix paucas libellas appendentem, illum salubritate corporis multa pondo in carne sua gerentem: tenta tu ambos tollere; gravis est validus, levis est macilentus. Recedat portator, appareat ambulator; ipsos dimitte sibi, agant corpora sua: video macrum vix passum moventem, video validum robustumque currentem. Si hoc valet sanitas, immortalitas quid valebit?
10. The swifter motion of certain heavier bodies. Turn your consideration and your thought from there to what I am about to say, if with the Lord's help I am able. What is moved more easily, what is driven more swiftly, a heavier body or a lighter? Who would not answer, The lighter? For lighter bodies are moved more easily and driven more swiftly; heavier ones with more difficulty and more slowly. Certainly you have fixed a rule, certainly you have considered, and having looked round at everything you have answered that lighter bodies are moved more easily and driven more swiftly than heavier ones. So it is, you say. Answer me, then. Why does the very light spider move slowly, and the heavy horse run swiftly? Let me speak of men themselves: the larger body of a man is heavier; the shorter body, which has less weight, is lighter. So indeed it is, but only if another carries it. But if the man himself carries his own body, the strong one runs, while the thin one, through weakness, scarcely walks. Weigh a thin man and a robust one: the one through weakness weighing scarcely a few little pounds, the other through the health of his body bearing many pounds in his flesh: try lifting them both; the strong one is heavy, the lean one is light. Let the carrier withdraw, let the walker appear; leave them to themselves, let them drive their own bodies: I see the thin man scarcely moving a step, I see the strong and robust man running. If health has this power, what power will immortality have?
CAPUT VIII. — 11. Corpora spiritualia post resurrectionem, unde dicta. Dabit ergo Deus miram facilitatem, miram levitatem. Non sine causa illa corpora spiritualia nuncupata sunt. Non ideo dicta sunt spiritualia, quia erunt spiritus, non corpora. Nam ista quae modo habemus, dicuntur animalia corpora: et tamen animae non sunt, sed corpora. Quomodo nunc ista animalia dicuntur, et animae non sunt: sic illa spiritualia dicuntur, sed non sunt spiritus, quia corpora erunt. Quare dicitur spirituale corpus, charissimi, nisi quia ad nutum spiritus serviet? Nihil tibi contradicet ex te, nihil in te rebellabit adversus te. Non ibi erit quod Apostolus gemit, Caro concupiscit adversus spiritum, et spiritus adversus carnem (Galat. V, 17). Non ibi erit, Video aliam legem in membris meis repugnantem legi mentis meae (Rom. VII, 23). Haec bella non ibi erunt: pax ibi erit, pax perfecta
Chapter VIII. — 11. Spiritual bodies after the resurrection: whence they are so called. God will therefore give a wonderful ease, a wonderful lightness. Not without reason have those bodies been named spiritual. They are not called spiritual because they will be spirits and not bodies. For these which we now have are called animal bodies, and yet they are not souls, but bodies. Just as these are now called animal and are not souls, so those are called spiritual, but are not spirits, because they will be bodies. Why is it called a spiritual body, dearly beloved, except because it will serve at the bidding of the spirit? Nothing from within you will contradict you, nothing in you will rebel against you. There will not be there what the Apostle groans over, The flesh lusts against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh (Gal. 5:17). There will not be there, I see another law in my members fighting against the law of my mind (Rom. 7:23). These wars will not be there: there will be peace there, perfect peace
Editors' notes and page, col. 1142

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible› · call in col 1142

¹ Er. Lugd. Ven. Lov. omittunt, quae. M.

Erasmus, Lyons, Venice and Louvain omit "quae" (which). M.

(printed under page 577)

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXLII. 1142
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)