Migne Reading Room

PL 38 · cols. 1316–1327

Augustine, Sermones 289-292 (Classis III, de Sanctis)

Sermons CCXCI–CCXCII

PL 38:1316
Quia esurientes implevit bonis, et divites dimisit inanes. Vade nunc, et ventila divitias tuas: jacta te, et dic, Dives sum. Quam dives? Si volo, justus sum; si nolo, justus non sum. In potestate habeo justum esse, et justum non esse. Non audis in Psalmo, Qui confidunt in virtute sua (Psal. XLVIII, 7)? Ergo Deus tibi carnem, Deus tibi sensum, Deus tibi animam, Deus tibi mentem, Deus tibi intelligentiam dedit: tu das tibi ipsi justitiam? Quid est caro, quid sunt sensus, quid est anima, quid est mens, quid est intelligentia sine justitia? Nonne omnia ista, si justitia careant, ad poenam valebunt? Ergo tam dives es, ut cum Deus tibi dederit inferiora, des tibi potiora? Male dives, exinaniende dives; si tamen habes quod te habere dixisti: Quid habes quod non accepisti (I Cor. IV, 7)? Nec saltem a superbo et divite illo pharisaeo, de his quae te habere dixisti, gratias Domino agere didicisti.
For He has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich He has sent away empty. Go now, and air your riches: vaunt yourself, and say, I am rich. How rich? If I will, I am just; if I do not will, I am not just. It is in my power to be just, and not to be just. Do you not hear in the Psalm, Those who trust in their own strength (Ps. 48:7)? So God gave you flesh, God gave you sense, God gave you a soul, God gave you a mind, God gave you understanding: do you give yourself justice? What is flesh, what are the senses, what is the soul, what is the mind, what is understanding without justice? Will not all these, if they lack justice, avail for punishment? Are you then so rich that, while God has given you the lesser things, you give yourself the greater? Wickedly rich, rich man who must be emptied; if indeed you have what you said you have: What do you have that you did not receive (1 Cor. 4:7)? Not even from that proud and rich Pharisee have you learned to give thanks to the Lord for the things you said you have.
SERMO CCXCI. In Natali Joannis Baptistae, V.
Sermon 291. On the Birthday of John the Baptist, 5.
1. Joannis nativitas mirabilis propter Christum. Quem diem celebramus hodiernum vobis dici non opus est, quia omnes, cum Evangelium legeretur, audistis. Hodie accepimus sanctum Joannem Domini praecursorem, sterilis filium nuntiantem virginis filium, sed tamen servum nuntiantem Dominum. Quia enim venturus erat per virginem Deus homo, praecessit eum de sterili mirabilis homo: ut cum se indignum dicit, cujus calceamenti corrigiam solvat mirabilis homo, agnoscatur Deus homo. Mirare Joannem, quantum potes: Christo proficit quod miraris. Proficit, inquam, Christo, non quia tu praestas aliquid Christo, sed ut tu proficias in Christo. Mirare ergo Joannem, quantum potes. Audisti quod mireris. Annuntiatur per angelum patri sacerdoti: vocem aufert angelus patri non credenti; remanet mutus, in filii nativitate exspectans linguam. Concepit sterilis, concepit et anus: gemina infecunditas, sterilitas et aetas. Dicitur ab angelo qualis futurus sit: impletur in eo quod dicitur; et quod maxime mirandum est, impletur Spiritu sancto adhuc ex utero matris suae. Deinde veniente Maria sancta, exsultat in utero; et quem non poterat vocibus, salutat motibus. Nascitur, dat patri vocem; pater loquens dat filio nomen: mirantur omnes tantam gratiam (Luc. I). Quid enim aliud quam gratia? Ubi enim Joannes iste promeruit Deum? Ubi promeruit Deum, antequam esset qui promereretur? O gratia gratis data!
1. The birth of John wonderful because of Christ. What day we are celebrating today there is no need to tell you, since all of you heard it when the Gospel was read. Today we have received holy John, the Lord's forerunner, son of a barren woman announcing the Son of a virgin, yet a servant announcing the Lord. For since God made man was to come through a virgin, a wonderful man went before Him from a barren woman: so that, when the wonderful man says he is unworthy to loose the strap of His sandal, God made man may be recognized. Marvel at John as much as you can: what you marvel at profits Christ. It profits Christ, I say, not because you bestow anything on Christ, but so that you may make progress in Christ. Marvel, then, at John as much as you can. You have heard something to marvel at. He is announced by an angel to his father, a priest: the angel takes away the voice of the father who does not believe; he remains mute, awaiting his tongue at the birth of his son. A barren woman conceived, an old woman conceived too: a twofold unfruitfulness, barrenness and age. It is said by the angel what he will be: what is said is fulfilled in him; and, what is most to be marvelled at, he is filled with the Holy Spirit while still from his mother's womb. Then, when holy Mary comes, he leaps in the womb; and the one he could not greet with words, he greets with movements. He is born, he gives his father a voice; the father, speaking, gives the son a name: all marvel at so great a grace (Luke 1). For what else but grace? Where did this John merit God? Where did he merit God before he existed to merit Him? O grace freely given!
2. Ex magnitudine Joannis majestas Christi intelligenda. Mirantur omnes, obstupescunt, et motu cordis sui dicunt, ut scriberetur nobis quod legeretur: Quia, putas, erit puer iste? Nam manus Domini cum illo. Quid, putas, erit puer iste? Excedit metas humanae naturae. Novimus pueros: sed, quid, putas, erit puer iste? Quare dicis, Quid, putas, erit puer iste? Manus enim Domini cum illo? Quia manus Domini cum illo
2. From the greatness of John the majesty of Christ is to be understood. All marvel, they are astounded, and by the movement of their heart they say, so that there might be written for us what should be read: What, do you think, will this child be? For the hand of the Lord is with him. What, do you think, will this child be? He exceeds the bounds of human nature. We know children: but, what, do you think, will this child be? Why do you say, What, do you think, will this child be? For the hand of the Lord is with him? That the hand of the Lord is with him
Editors' notes and page, col. 1316

Footnotes

(a) ‹anchor: not visible on the page foot (sermon title)› · call in col 1316

Alias, inter Vignerianos 4.

Elsewhere [numbered] 4 among the Vignier sermons.

(printed under page 664)

Page

  • running head: [S. AURELII A]UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 1316 (left part cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1317
est, jam scimus; sed quid erit, nescimus. Utique valde magnus erit, qui tam magnus coepit. Quid erit, qui tantillus tantus est? quid erit: Hebescit humana infirmitas, omnium considerantium corda contremiscunt: Quid, putas, erit puer iste? Magnus erit: sed quid erit qui major illo erit? Valde iste magnus erit: sed quid erit qui isto magno major erit? Si ille qui modo coepit esse, tam magnus erit, quid erit qui erat? Sed quid dixi, qui erat? Ante Joannem et Zacharias erat, multo magis ante Joannem et Abraham et Isaac et Jacob erant. Ante Joannem certe coelum et terra erant. Quid erit qui in principio erat? In principio enim, quod est ante Joannem, et ante omnem hominem, fecit Deus coelum et terram (Gen. I, 1). Sed per quid fecit quaeris? In principio non fecit Deus Verbum, sed erat Verbum: In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat, non qualecumque, sed Deus erat Verbum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt. Et novissimo tempore factus est qui erat, ne periret quod fecerat. Quid, putas, erit puer iste? Manus enim Domini cum illo est. Si puer tam magnus erit, quia est cum illo manus Domini; quid ipsa manus Domini? Christus enim manus Domini, Filius Dei manus Dei, Verbum Dei manus Dei. Quae est enim manus Dei, nisi per quam facta sunt omnia? Quid, putas, erit puer iste? Manus enim Domini cum illo. O humana infirmitas, quid factura es in judice, quae sic haesitas in praecone? Sed etiam hic quid dixi? Redeo ad considerationem consuetudinis humanae. Et quid dixi? Praeconem dixi, judicem dixi et praeco: homo, et judex homo. Quod apparebat dixi, quod latebat quis dixerit? Verbum caro factum est (Joan. I, 1, 2, 14): non tamen Verbum in carnem versum est. Verbum caro factum est, accipiendo quod non erat; non amittendo quod erat. Ecce admirati sumus praeconis ejus nativitatem, quam hodie celebramus, sed propter quem facta est videamus.
we already know; but what he will be, we do not know. Certainly he will be very great who began so great. What will he be, who, so small, is so great? What will he be? Human weakness grows dull, the hearts of all who consider it tremble: What, do you think, will this child be? He will be great: but what will He be Who will be greater than he? This one will be very great: but what will He be Who will be greater than this great one? If he who has only now begun to be will be so great, what will He be Who was? But what have I said, Who was? Before John, Zacharias too was; much more, before John, Abraham and Isaac and Jacob were. Before John, certainly, heaven and earth were. What will He be Who was in the beginning? For in the beginning, which is before John and before every man, God made heaven and earth (Gen. 1:1). But do you ask through what He made them? In the beginning God did not make the Word, but the Word was: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was, not a word of any sort, but the Word was God. All things were made through Him. And in the last time He Who was was made, so that what He had made might not perish. What, do you think, will this child be? For the hand of the Lord is with him. If the child will be so great because the hand of the Lord is with him, what is the hand of the Lord itself? For Christ is the hand of the Lord, the Son of God is the hand of God, the Word of God is the hand of God. For what is the hand of God, if not that through which all things were made? What, do you think, will this child be? For the hand of the Lord is with him. O human weakness, what will you do with the judge, you who hesitate so over the herald? But here too, what have I said? I return to the consideration of human custom. And what have I said? I said herald, I said judge, and the herald: a man, and the judge a man. What was apparent I have said; what lay hidden, who could have said? The Word was made flesh (John 1:1, 2, 14): yet the Word was not turned into flesh. The Word was made flesh by receiving what He was not, not by losing what He was. Behold, we have marvelled at the birth of His herald, which we celebrate today; but let us see Him for whose sake it came about.
3. Angelus ad Zachariam et ad Mariam missns. Oratio Zachariae quomodo exaudita. Venit angelus Gabriel ad Zachariam, non ad Elisabeth uxorem ejus, matrem Joannis: venit, inquam, angelus Gabriel ad Zachariam, non ad Elisabeth. Quare? Quia Joannes per Zachariam futurus erat in Elisabeth. Ergo angelus annuntians venturum Joannem nascendo, non venit ad exceptorium ventris, sed ad fontem seminis. Nuntiavit amborum futurum filium, sed patri nuntiavit. Venturus enim erat Joannes de connubio masculi et feminae. Ecce iterum ipse Gabriel venit ad Mariam, non ad Joseph: unde erat caro illa coeptura, unde erat initium habitura, ad ipsam angelus venit. Patri autem sacerdoti Zachariae quomodo angelus futurum filium praenuntiavit? Noli, inquit, timere, Zacharia, exaudita est oratio tua. Quid enim, fratres mei, sacerdos ille ideo intraverat in Sancta sanctorum, ut filios precaretur a Domino: Absit! Dicit aliquis: Unde hoc probas? non enim indicavit Zacharias quid rogaverit. Unum est quod breviter dico: Si petisset filium, crederet annuntiatum. Angelus dicit quod ei filius nasceretur, ille non credit? certe hoc rogaverat? Quis rogat
3. The angel sent to Zacharias and to Mary. How the prayer of Zacharias was heard. The angel Gabriel came to Zacharias, not to Elisabeth his wife, the mother of John: the angel Gabriel came, I say, to Zacharias, not to Elisabeth. Why? Because John was to come to be in Elisabeth through Zacharias. Therefore the angel, announcing that John would come by being born, did not come to the receptacle of the womb, but to the source of the seed. He announced the future son of both, but he announced it to the father. For John was to come from the union of male and female. Behold, again the same Gabriel came to Mary, not to Joseph: to her from whom that flesh was to begin, from whom it was to have its beginning, to her the angel came. But how did the angel foretell the future son to the father, the priest Zacharias? Do not fear, he says, Zacharias, your prayer has been heard. For what, my brethren, had that priest entered into the Holy of Holies for this reason, to pray to the Lord for sons? Far from it! Someone says: How do you prove this? For Zacharias did not disclose what he had asked. There is one thing that I say briefly: If he had sought a son, he would have believed it when it was announced. The angel says that a son would be born to him, and he does not believe? Had he really asked for this? Who asks
Editors' notes and page, col. 1317

Page

  • running head: 1317 SERMO CCXCI (cut off at the right edge of the image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • misprints kept as printed: "missns" (for missus), in the italic summary of § 3 (added by QA Q1)
  • QA Q1 UNSURE: in § 3, "Venturus enim erat" — the page shows an acute mark over the a of "erat" ("erát"); probably a stray mark or broken type, not set; check on a better scan.
PL 38:1318
sine spe? aut quis non credit in spe? Si non speras, quare petis? si speras, quare non credis? Quid ergo? Exaudita est, inquit, oratio tua: nam ecce concipiet Elisabeth, et pariet tibi filium. Quare? Quia exaudita est oratio tua. Si diceret Zacharias, Quare? hoc rogavi? Utique angelus nec falleretur, nec falleret, quando dicebat? Exaudita est oratio tua: nam ecce paritura est uxor tua. Sed quare hoc dictum est? Quia ille pro populo sacrificabat: sacerdos pro populo sacrificabat, populus Christum exspectabat; Joannes Christum annuntiabat.
without hope? or who does not believe in hope? If you do not hope, why do you ask? if you hope, why do you not believe? What then? Your prayer, he says, has been heard: for behold, Elisabeth will conceive, and will bear you a son. Why? Because your prayer has been heard. If Zacharias were to say, Why? did I ask for this? Surely the angel would neither be deceived nor deceive, when he said? Your prayer has been heard: for behold, your wife is going to give birth. But why was this said? Because he was sacrificing for the people: the priest was sacrificing for the people, the people were awaiting Christ; John was announcing Christ.
4. Maria inter mulieres benedicta. Angelus vero idem ipse ad Mariam virginem: Ave, inquit, gratia plena, Dominus tecum: jam tecum est qui erit in te. Benedicta tu inter mulieres. Proprietate hebraicae linguae omnes feminas mulieres dici solere Scriptura sancta testatur: ne forte mirentur aut scandalizentur, qui non solent Scripturas audire. Dominus quodam Scripturarum loco aperte dicit, Segregate mulieres, quae non cognoverunt virum (Num. XXXI, 17, sec. LXX). Ipsam denique recolite originem nostram: quando facta est Eva de latere viri, quid dicit Scriptura? Detraxit ei costam, et aedificavit eam in mulierem (Gen. II, 22). Jam mulier vocatur, de viro quidem sumpta, sed nondum viro conjuncta. Jam ergo cum auditis ab angelo, Benedicta tu inter mulieres; sic accipite, ac si more nostro diceretur, Benedicta tu inter feminas.
4. Mary blessed among women. And the very same angel says to the Virgin Mary: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you: already He is with you Who will be in you. Blessed are you among women. Holy Scripture testifies that by an idiom of the Hebrew tongue all females are customarily called women: lest perhaps those who are not accustomed to hearing the Scriptures should be surprised or scandalized. The Lord says plainly in a certain place of the Scriptures, Set apart the women who have not known a man (Num. 31:17, according to the Septuagint). Finally, call to mind our very origin: when Eve was made from the side of the man, what does Scripture say? He took a rib from him, and built it into a woman (Gen. 2:22). Already she is called woman, taken indeed from the man, but not yet joined to the man. So then, when you hear from the angel, Blessed are you among women, take it as if it were said in our manner, Blessed are you among females.
5. Zachariae et Mariae similis interrogatio, animus dissimilis. Propositum virginitatis. Promittitur Zachariae filius, promittitur et sanctae Mariae filius, et dicit etiam ipsa pene ipsa verba quae dixerat Zacharias. Quid enim dixerat Zacharias? Unde mihi hoc? Ego enim sum senex, et uxor mea sterilis, et progressa in diebus suis. Quid et Maria sancta? Quomodo fiet istud? Similis vox, dissimile cor. Vocem similem aure audiamus, cor autem dissimile angelo pronuntiante noscamus. Peccavit David, et a propheta correptus dixit, Peccavi: continuo ei dictum est, Dimissum est tibi peccatum (II Reg. XII, 13). Peccavit Saül, et a Propheta correptus dixit, Peccavi: nec ei dimissum est peccatum, sed mansit ira Dei super eum (I Reg. XV, 30, 35). Quid est hoc, nisi quod similis vox, dissimile cor? Homo enim est vocis auditor, Deus cordis inspector. In illis ergo verbis Zachariae non fuisse fidem, sed dubitationem et desperationem angelus vidit, angelus indicavit, vocem tollendo, infidelitatem damnando. Sancta vero Maria: Quomodo fiet istud, quia virum non cognosco? Agnoscite propositum virginis. Quando diceret, concubitura cum viro, Quomodo fiet istud? Si enim fieret, quomodo de omnibus infantibus fieri solet, non diceret, Quomodo fiet? Sed illa propositi sui memor, et sancti voti conscia, quia noverat quid voverat; dicendo, Quomodo fiet istud, quoniam virum non cognosco? quoniam non noverat hoc fieri, ut filii nascerentur nisi conjugatis et concumbentibus cum viris suis, quod ipsa proposuerat ignorare, dicendo, Quomodo fiet istud? modum quaesivit, non de Dei omnipotentia dubitavit. Quomodo fiet istud? Quis modus est quo fiet istud? Annuntias
5. The question of Zacharias and of Mary alike, the mind unlike. The resolve of virginity. A son is promised to Zacharias, a son is promised also to holy Mary, and she too says almost the very words that Zacharias had said. For what had Zacharias said? Whence is this to me? For I am an old man, and my wife is barren, and advanced in her days. And what did holy Mary say? How shall this be? A like voice, an unlike heart. Let us hear the like voice with the ear, but let us learn the unlike heart from the angel's pronouncement. David sinned, and, rebuked by the prophet, he said, I have sinned: at once it was said to him, Your sin is forgiven you (2 Sam. 12:13). Saul sinned, and, rebuked by the Prophet, he said, I have sinned: and his sin was not forgiven him, but the wrath of God remained upon him (1 Sam. 15:30, 35). What is this, except that the voice was alike, the heart unlike? For man is a hearer of the voice, God an inspector of the heart. So in those words of Zacharias the angel saw that there was not faith, but doubt and despair; the angel showed it, by taking away his voice, by condemning his unbelief. But holy Mary: How shall this be, since I do not know a man? Recognize the resolve of the virgin. If she were going to lie with a man, would she say, How shall this be? For if it were to happen in the way it usually happens with all infants, she would not say, How shall it be? But she, mindful of her resolve, and conscious of her holy vow, because she knew what she had vowed, by saying, How shall this be, since I do not know a man?, since she did not know that this could happen, that sons should be born except to women married and lying with their husbands, which she herself had resolved to know nothing of, by saying, How shall this be?, asked about the manner, did not doubt concerning the omnipotence of God. How shall this be? What is the manner in which this shall be? You announce
Editors' notes and page, col. 1318

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXCI. 1318
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: column begins with "gat", the end of "ro-gat" broken from col. 1317; "filium" in para. 1 poorly printed, read as filium (UNSURE); "Gen. II" printed with damaged numeral, read as II; stray mark after "nostram" ignored; Saül set with diaeresis as printed; no marginal letters visible in the images; fragments of col. 1317 visible at left edge, not set
PL 38:1319
mihi filium, habes meum paratum animum, dic mihi modum. Potuit enim virgo sancta metuere, aut certe ignorare consilium Dei, quomodo eam vellet habere filium, quasi improbasset virginis votum. Quid enim ⟨s⟩i diceret, Nube, conjungere viro? Non diceret Deus; accepit enim votum virginis, quomodo Deus. Et hoc ab illa accepit, quod ipse donavit. Dic mihi ergo, nuntie Dei, Quomodo fiet istud? Vide angelum scientem, illam quaerentem, non diffidentem. Quia ergo vidit eam quaerentem, non diffidentem, non se negavit instruentem. Audi quomodo: e⟨r⟩it virginitas tua, tu tantum crede veritatem, serva virginitatem, accipe integritatem. Quoniam integra est fides tua, intacta erit et integritas tua. Denique audi quomodo fiet istud: Spiritus sanctus superveniet in te, et virtus Altissimi obumbrabit tibi. Tale umbraculum nescit libidinis aestum. Propterea, quia Spiritus sanctus superveniet in te, et virtus Altissimi obumbrabit tibi; quia fide concipis, quia credendo, in utero, non concumbendo habebis: propterea quod nascetur de te Sanctum, vocabitur Filius Dei.
a son to me, you have my mind ready, tell me the manner. For the holy virgin could have feared, or at any rate not known, the counsel of God, how He wished her to have a son, as though He had disapproved of the virgin's vow. For what if He were to say, Marry, be joined to a husband? God would not say that; for He accepted the virgin's vow, as God [does]. And He accepted from her what He Himself had given. Tell me then, messenger of God, How shall this be? See the angel knowing, and her asking, not distrusting. Since then he saw her asking, not distrusting, he did not refuse to instruct her. Hear how: your virginity shall remain; only believe the truth, keep your virginity, receive integrity. Since your faith is whole, your integrity too will be untouched. Then hear how this shall be: The Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you. Such a shade knows not the heat of lust. Therefore, because the Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you; because you conceive by faith, because by believing, not by lying with a man, you will have [a child] in your womb: therefore the Holy One who will be born of you shall be called the Son of God.
6. Maria ex gratia mater Filii Dei. Quid es, quae postea paritura es? Unde meruisti? unde hoc accepisti? unde fiet in te qui fecit te? Unde, inquam, tibi hoc tantum bonum? Virgo es, sancta es, votum vovisti; sed multum quod meruisti, imo vero multum quod accepisti. Nam unde hoc meruisti? Fit in te qui fecit te, fit in te per quem facta es: imo vero per quem factum est caelum et terra, per quem facta sunt omnia, fit in te Verbum Dei caro, accipiendo carnem, non amittendo divinitatem. Et Verbum jungitur carni, et Verbum copulatur carni; et hujus tanti conjugii thalamus, uterus tuus; et hujus, inquam, tanti conjugii, id est Verbi et carnis thalamus uterus tuus: unde ipse sponsus procedit de thalamo suo (Psal. XVIII, 6). Invenit te virginem conceptus, dimittit virginem natus. Dat fecunditatem, non tollit integritatem. Unde tibi hoc? Proterve virginem videor interrogare, et quasi importune aures verecundas ista mea voce pulsare. Sed video virginem verecundantem, et tamen respondentem, meque admonentem: Quaeris a me unde mihi hoc? Verecundor tibi respondere bonum meum, angeli audi ipsius salutationem, et in me agnosce tuam salutem. Crede cui credidi. Unde mihi hoc quaeris? Angelus respondeat. Dic mihi, angele, unde Mariae hoc? Jam dixi, cum salutavi: Ave, gratia plena (Luc. I, 28).
6. Mary by grace the mother of the Son of God. What are you, who are afterwards to give birth? Whence did you merit it? Whence did you receive this? Whence shall He who made you be made in you? Whence, I say, comes to you so great a good? You are a virgin, you are holy, you have vowed a vow; but much is what you have merited, nay rather much is what you have received. For whence did you merit this? He who made you is made in you; He through Whom you were made is made in you: nay rather, He through Whom heaven and earth were made, through Whom all things were made, the Word of God is made flesh in you, by taking on flesh, not by losing divinity. And the Word is joined to flesh, and the Word is coupled with flesh; and the bridal chamber of so great a marriage is your womb; and of so great a marriage, I say, that is, of the Word and the flesh, the bridal chamber is your womb: whence the bridegroom Himself comes forth from His bridal chamber (Ps. 18:6). Conceived, He found you a virgin; born, He leaves you a virgin. He gives fruitfulness, He does not take away integrity. Whence comes this to you? I seem to be questioning a virgin impudently, and as it were striking her modest ears importunately with this voice of mine. But I see the virgin abashed, and yet answering, and admonishing me: Do you ask me whence this comes to me? I am abashed to answer you about my good; hear the angel's own greeting, and recognize in me your salvation. Believe Him in Whom I believed. Do you ask me whence this comes to me? Let the angel answer. Tell me, angel, whence comes this to Mary? I said it already, when I greeted her: Hail, full of grace (Luke 1:28).
SERMO CCXCII. In Natali Joannis Baptistae, VI.
Sermon 292. On the Nativity of John the Baptist, 6.
In quo disputatur contra Donatistas.
In which there is disputation against the Donatists.
CAPUT PRIMUM. — 1. Joannis nativitas cur celebretur, non aliorum. Diei hodiernae solemnitas solemnem desiderat tanta exspectatione sermonem. Ergo, adjuvante Domino, ministrabimus vobis quod dederit, recolentes et animo tenentes nostrae officium
Chapter I. — 1. Why the nativity of John is celebrated, and not that of others. The solemnity of today's day calls, with such great expectation, for a solemn sermon. Therefore, with the Lord's help, we shall serve to you what He has given, recalling and keeping in mind the office of our
Editors' notes and page, col. 1319

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible on the page foot› · call in col 1319

Forte, accepit enim votum virginis, quod vovit Deo.

Perhaps [read] "for he received the virgin's vow, which she vowed to God."

(*) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXCII› · call in col 1319 Castigatus ad duos cb. ad cl. d. r. t. v. et ad Am. Er. Par. Lov. et ad Vign.

Corrected against two [manuscripts, siglum "cb."], against [the manuscripts "cl.", "d.", "r.", "t.", "v." as printed], against the editions Am., Er., Par., Lov. [Amerbach, Erasmus, Paris, Louvain], and against Vignier.

(printed under page 666)

(a) ‹anchor: SERMO CCXCII› · call in col 1319

Alias, de Sanctis 23.

Elsewhere [numbered] 23 among the sermons on the Saints.

(printed under page 666)

(b) ‹anchor: contra Donatistas› · call in col 1319

Citat Florus ad Philipp. II.

Florus cites it on Philippians 2.

(printed under page 666)

Page

  • running head: 1319 S. AUGUSTINI EPIS (cut off at image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: ligature doubt raised by the check (text not changed): caelum | coelum (page appears to print cœlum); text not changed
PL 38:1320
servitutis, ut loquamur, non tanquam magistri, sed tanquam ministri; non discipulis, sed condiscipulis; quia nec servis, sed conservis. Magister autem unus est nobis, cujus schola in terra est, et cathedra in coelo: cujus praecursor Joannes est natus, cujus nativitatis dies hodiernus traditur, hodie celebratur. Hoc majorum traditione suscepimus, hoc ad posteros imitanda devotione transmittimus. Joannis ergo non Evangelistae, sed Baptistae Natalem hodie celebramus. Qua prima re posita, occurrit quaestio non praetereunda, quare Natalem, quo est ortus ex utero Joannes, potius celebremus, quam cujuslibet apostoli vel martyris vel prophetae vel patriarchae? Si interrogemur, quid respondebimus? Quantum mihi videtur, quantum mearum virium mediocritati occurrit, haec causa est: Discipuli Domini nati, et per aetatis accessum ad annos capaciores perducti, in discipulatum assumpti sunt; illorum postea fides Domino adhaesit, sed nullius illorum nativitas Domino militavit. Recordemur et Prophetas, recolamus Patriarchas: nati sunt homines, aetatis accessu repleti Spiritu sancto prophetaverunt Christum; nati sunt, ut postea prophetarent. Joannis autem ipsa nativitas Dominum Christum prophetavit, quem conceptum ex utero salutavit.
service, that we may speak not as masters but as ministers; not to disciples but to fellow disciples; for not to servants either, but to fellow servants. For we have one Master, Whose school is on earth and Whose chair is in heaven: Whose forerunner John was born, the day of whose nativity is handed down as today, and is celebrated today. This we have received by the tradition of our elders, this we hand on to those who come after us, with a devotion they should imitate. So it is the Nativity of John, not the Evangelist but the Baptist, that we celebrate today. With this first point laid down, a question arises that must not be passed over: why do we celebrate the Nativity, the day on which John came forth from the womb, rather than that of any apostle or martyr or prophet or patriarch? If we are asked, what shall we answer? As far as it seems to me, as far as occurs to the mediocrity of my powers, this is the reason: the disciples of the Lord were born, and, brought on by the advance of age to more capable years, were taken up into discipleship; afterwards their faith clung to the Lord, but the nativity of none of them served the Lord. Let us call to mind the Prophets too, let us recall the Patriarchs: they were born men, and, filled with the Holy Spirit as their age advanced, they prophesied Christ; they were born, so that they might afterwards prophesy. But the very nativity of John prophesied the Lord Christ, Whom, once conceived, he greeted from the womb.
CAPUT II. — 2. Cur tantus homo Joannes, nec inter discipulos Domini, sed discipulos habens cum Domino. Donatistarum voces superbae. Ista, ut potuimus, soluta quaestione, alteram aggrediamur, pro viribus quas dederit Dominus. Occurrit enim alia quaestio aliquanto, ut mihi videtur, obstrusior, et ad perscrutandum laboriosior, in qua me multum adjuvabit vestra intentio, et pro mea exiguitate ad Dominum deprecatio. Joannes iste tanta excellens gratia, ut quemadmodum dictum est, Dominum etiam ex utero salutaret, nondum loquendo, sed exsultando; cujus gratia in Deum jam tunc erat aperta, quando ejus caro in carne erat inclusa: hic ergo Joannes non invenitur inter discipulos Domini, sed invenitur potius discipulos habuisse cum Domino. Quid est hoc? Quis est iste homo? Homo tantus, quis homo tantus? quantus tantus homo? Tamen non sequebatur inter discipulos Dominum, et sequebantur eum discipuli: absit ut dicam, contra Dominum; sed tamen quasi extra Dominum. Discipulos habebat Christus, discipulos habebat Joannes: docebat Christus, docebat Joannes. Quid jam dicam? Baptizabat Joannes, baptizabat Christus. Plus hic de baptismo dico, a Joanne baptizatus est Christus. Ubi sunt qui de ministerio Baptismi arrogantia tumidae animositatis inflantur? Ubi sunt voces carentes humilitate, elatae superbia, Ego baptizo, ego baptizo? Quid dixisses, si Christum baptizare meruisses? Magna jam, quantum advertit Sanctitas vestra, apparere et eminere causa coepit, qua fuerat et Christus a Patre mittendus, et Joannes a Christo praemittendus. Prior missus est Joannes, sed sicut ab obsequentibus anteceditur judex. Posterior homo creatus est Christus, sed Joannem creavit Deus Christus. Erat igitur Joannes homo perfectus quidem, et
Chapter II. — 2. Why John, so great a man, was not among the disciples of the Lord, but had disciples alongside the Lord. The proud words of the Donatists. With this question solved as best we could, let us approach another, according to the strength the Lord may give. For another question arises, somewhat more abstruse, as it seems to me, and more laborious to search out, in which your attention will help me greatly, and your prayer to the Lord on behalf of my littleness. This John, excelling in such great grace that, as has been said, he greeted the Lord even from the womb, not yet by speaking but by leaping for joy; whose grace towards God was already manifest even then, when his flesh was enclosed within flesh: this John, then, is not found among the disciples of the Lord, but is rather found to have had disciples alongside the Lord. What is this? Who is this man? So great a man, what so great a man? how great, so great a man? Yet he did not follow the Lord among the disciples, and disciples followed him: far be it from me to say, against the Lord; but nevertheless as it were apart from the Lord. Christ had disciples, John had disciples: Christ taught, John taught. What more shall I say? John baptized, Christ baptized. I say more here concerning baptism: Christ was baptized by John. Where are those who are puffed up concerning the ministry of Baptism with the arrogance of a swollen animosity? Where are the voices lacking humility, lifted up with pride, "I baptize, I baptize"? What would you have said, had you been found worthy to baptize Christ? Now, as your Holiness observes, a great reason has begun to appear and stand out, why both Christ was to be sent by the Father, and John was to be sent ahead by Christ. John was sent first, but as a judge is preceded by his attendants. Christ was created a man later, but Christ God created John. John, then, was indeed a perfect man, and
Editors' notes and page, col. 1320

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: Homo tantus› · call in col 1320

Sic Mss. At editi, tantum.

So the manuscripts. But the printed editions [read] "tantum".

(printed under page 666)

Page

  • running head: [A]UGUSTINI EPISCOPI 1320 (left edge cropped in image)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1321
cujus tanta gratia commendata est, ut ipse de illo Dominus diceret, In natis mulierum nemo exsurrexit major Jounne Baptista (Matth. XI, 11). Iste ergo tam magnus agnoscit Dominum in parvo magnum: agnoscit homo eum qui venerat homo Deus. Si enim in natis mulierum, hoc est, in hominibus, nemo exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista; quisquis Joanne plus est, non tantum homo, sed et Deus est. Debuit ergo tantus iste, et discipulos proprios habere, et cum discipulis suis magistrum omnium Christum cognoscere. Quod enim est majus testimonium veritatis, quam se humiliando eum agnoscere, cui aemulando poterat invidere? Putari Christus potuit, et noluit: existimari Christus potuit, et noluit. Dixerunt homines, cum fallerentur in eo: Num forte hic est Christus? Respondit ille quod non erat, ut maneret quod erat. Inde quippe Adam lapsus perdidit quod erat, quia id quod non erat usurpavit. Recolebat hoc homo iste magnus, sed ut parvo Christo minimus: noverat hoc, recolebat hoc, et tenebat; quia recipere quod ille perdiderat cogitabat. Homo ergo iste, ut dixi, magnus Joannes, cui Dominus testimonium tale perhibuit, quem sic veritas commendavit, ut diceret, In natis mulierum non exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista; potuit credi Christus, imo jam ab eis qui ejus magnitudinis gratia fallebantur, credebatur Christus: et in illo errore morerentur, nisi ab illo confitente corrigerentur. Respondit ergo ita putantibus, et ait: Non sum ego Christus (Joan. I, 20). Tanquam diceret: Certe in honorem meum ita fallimini; et certe mihi hoc putando magnam additis laudem: sed ego me debeo agnoscere, ut vobis errantibus ille possit ignoscere. Si enim quod non erat fallaciter putaretur, ab illo qui erat veraciter amputaretur.
whose grace was commended so greatly that the Lord Himself said of him, Among those born of women none has arisen greater than John the Baptist (Matt. 11:11). This man, then, so great, recognizes the Lord, great in the small: a man recognizes Him Who, being God, had come as a man. For if among those born of women, that is, among men, none has arisen greater than John the Baptist, whoever is more than John is not only man but also God. It was fitting, therefore, that this man, so great, should both have disciples of his own and, together with his disciples, acknowledge Christ the master of all. For what greater testimony to the truth is there than to acknowledge, by humbling himself, Him Whom he could have envied through rivalry? He could have been thought the Christ, and did not wish it; he could have been reckoned the Christ, and did not wish it. Men said, when they were deceived about him: Is this perhaps the Christ? He answered what he was not, so that he might remain what he was. For it was by this that Adam, having fallen, lost what he was, because he usurped what he was not. This great man called this to mind, but as the least in comparison with the little Christ: he knew this, he called this to mind, and he held to it; because he was intent on recovering what that man had lost. This man, then, as I have said, the great John, to whom the Lord bore such testimony, whom the Truth so commended as to say, Among those born of women there has not arisen a greater than John the Baptist, could have been believed to be the Christ; nay, he was already believed to be the Christ by those who were being deceived on account of his greatness: and they would have died in that error, had they not been corrected by him when he confessed. He answered, therefore, those who thought so, and said: I am not the Christ (John 1:20). As if he were saying: Certainly you are so deceived to my honour; and certainly by thinking this you add great praise to me: but I ought to acknowledge myself, so that He may be able to forgive you in your error. For if what he was not were falsely supposed, it would truly be cut off by Him Who was.
CAPUT III. — 3. Christus ut humilitatis viam doceret, baptizatus et incarnatus. Praemissus est ergo Joannes, ut Dominum humilem baptizaret. Baptizari enim Dominus propter humilitatem voluit, non propter iniquitatem. Dominus Christus quare est baptizatus? Dominus Christus Dei Filius unigenitus, quare est baptizatus? Inveni quare est natus, et ibi invenies quare sit baptizatus. Ibi quippe invenies humilitatis viam, quam pede superbo non carpis: quam nisi humili pede calcaveris, ad celsitudinem, quo perducit, pervenire non poteris. Baptizatus est propter te, qui descendit propter te. Vide quantus factus sit tantillus: Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Non enim erat rapina, sed erat natura aequalitas Filii cum Patre. Joannes si se Christum putari vellet, illi rapina esset. Non ergo rapinam arbitratus est esse aequalis Deo. Erat enim, et sine rapina erat, coaeternus ab aeterno natus erat. Tamen semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens (Philipp. II, 6, 7); hoc est, formam hominis accipiens. Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non formam Dei accepisset: ergo cum in forma Dei esset, semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens. Sic accepit quod non erat, ut non perderet quod erat. Manens Deus, hominem assumpsit Formam servi accepit, et factus est Deus homo, a quo Deo fa⟨c⟩tus est homo.
Chapter III. — 3. Christ, that He might teach the way of humility, was baptized and became incarnate. John, then, was sent ahead so that he might baptize the humble Lord. For the Lord willed to be baptized on account of humility, not on account of iniquity. Why was the Lord Christ baptized? The Lord Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, why was He baptized? Find out why He was born, and there you will find why He was baptized. For there you will find the way of humility, which you do not tread with a proud foot: unless you walk it with a humble foot, you will not be able to arrive at the height to which it leads. He was baptized for your sake, Who came down for your sake. See how great a one became so small: Who, though He was in the form of God, did not reckon it robbery to be equal to God. For it was not robbery, but it was by nature the equality of the Son with the Father. If John had wished himself to be thought the Christ, it would have been robbery for him. Therefore He did not reckon it robbery to be equal to God. For He was, and He was without robbery; coeternal, He was born from eternity. Nevertheless He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant (Phil. 2:6–7); that is, taking the form of a man. Who, though He was in the form of God, had not received the form of God: therefore, though He was in the form of God, He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant. Thus He received what He was not, so as not to lose what He was. Remaining God, He assumed man. He received the form of a servant, and God became man, by Whom as God man was made.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1321

Page

  • running head: 1321 SERMO CCXCII.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1322
CAPUT IV. — Vide ergo, quae majestas, quae potestas, quae sublimitas, quae cum Patre aequalitas venit propter nos ad indumentum formae servilis: et intellige illam a magistro tanto humilitatis viam; quoniam plus est quod voluit homo fieri, quam quod voluit ab homine baptizari.
Chapter IV. — See, therefore, what majesty, what power, what loftiness, what equality with the Father came for our sake to the clothing of the form of a servant: and understand that way of humility [taught] by so great a master; since it is more that He willed to become man than that He willed to be baptized by a man.
4. Baptizari cur a Joanne voluit. Baptizat ergo, inquam, Joannes Christum, servus Dominum, vox Verbum. Mementote enim, Ego sum vox clamantis in eremo: et mementote quia Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, 23, 14). Baptizat ergo, inquam, Joannes Christum, servus Dominum, vox Verbum, creatura Creatorem, lucerna solem; sed solem, qui fecit hunc solem; solem de quo dictum est, Ortus est mihi sol justitiae, et sanitas in pennis ejus (Malach. IV, 2). De quo impii sero poenitentes in fine in judicio Dei dicturi sunt: Quid nobis profuit superbia? aut quid divitiarum jactantia contulit nobis? Transierunt illa omnia tanquam umbra: et cum umbris qui secuti sunt umbras. Ergo, inquiunt, erravimus a via veritatis, et justitiae lumen non luxit nobis, et sol non est ortus nobis (Sap. V, 6-8). Illis non est ortus Christus, a quibus non est agnitus Christus. Sol ille justitiae, sine nube, sine nocte; ipse non oritur malis, non oritur impiis, non oritur infidelibus. Nam solem istum de coelo corporeum quotidie facit oriri super bonos et malos (Matth. V, 45). Baptizavit ergo, ut dixi, creatura Creatorem, lucerna solem: et non se extulit baptizator, sed subdidit baptizando. Nam venienti ad se dixit: Tu venis ad me baptizari? Ego a te debeo baptizari. Magna confessio, et secura lucernae in humilitate professio. Illa si contra solem extolleretur, vento superbiae cito exstingueretur. Hoc est ergo quod Dominus praevidit, quod baptismo suo Dominus docuit. Baptizari voluit tantus a tantillo; ut breve explicem, salvator a salvando. Nam meminerat Joannes alicujus fortassis, quamvis tantus esset, aegritudinis suae. Nam unde, Ego a te debeo baptizari? Certe Domini Baptismus salus: quia Domini est salus (Psal. III, 9). Nam vana salus hominum (Psal. LIX, 13). Unde ergo, Ego a te debeo baptizari, si non opus habebat curari? Mira autem in ipsa Domini humilitate medicina: ille baptizabat, et ille sanabat. Si enim Christus salvator omnium hominum, maxime fidelium (I Tim. IV, 10): apostolica et vera sententia est, quia Christus salvator omnium hominum: nemo dicat, Non opus habeo salvatore. Qui hoc dicit, se medico non humiliat, sed in morbo suo perit. Si salvator omnium hominum, ergo et Joannis: neque enim Joannes non homo. Magnus quidem homo, sed tamen homo. Ille salvator omnium hominum: agnoscit itaque ille salvatorem suum. Neque enim Joannis non erat salvator Christus. Non hoc dicit ipse, qui humiliter confitetur, dicens: Ego a te debeo baptizari. Et Dominus: Sine modo, impleatur omnis
4. Why He willed to be baptized by John. John, therefore, I say, baptizes Christ, the servant the Lord, the voice the Word. For remember: I am the voice of one crying in the desert; and remember that The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (John 1:23, 14). John, therefore, I say, baptizes Christ, the servant the Lord, the voice the Word, the creature the Creator, the lamp the sun; but the sun Who made this sun; the sun of Whom it was said, The sun of justice has risen for me, and healing in His wings (Mal. 4:2). Of Whom the ungodly, repenting too late, at the end in the judgement of God, will say: What has pride profited us? or what has the boasting of riches brought us? All those things have passed away like a shadow: and with the shadows [pass] those who followed shadows. Therefore, they say, we have strayed from the way of truth, and the light of justice has not shone for us, and the sun has not risen for us (Wis. 5:6–8). Christ has not risen for those by whom Christ has not been acknowledged. That Sun of justice is without cloud, without night; He does not rise for the wicked, He does not rise for the ungodly, He does not rise for unbelievers. For this bodily sun in the sky He makes to rise daily upon the good and the wicked (Matt. 5:45). The creature, therefore, as I said, baptized the Creator, the lamp the sun: and the baptizer did not exalt himself, but subjected himself in baptizing. For to Him as He came to him he said: Thou come to me to be baptized? I ought to be baptized by Thee. A great confession, and a safe profession of the lamp in humility. If it were to exalt itself against the sun, it would quickly be put out by the wind of pride. This, therefore, is what the Lord foresaw, what the Lord taught by His baptism. One so great willed to be baptized by one so small; to put it briefly, the Saviour by one to be saved. For John remembered, perhaps, some sickness of his own, great as he was. For whence else, I ought to be baptized by Thee? Surely the Lord's Baptism is salvation: because salvation is the Lord's (Ps. 3:9). For vain is the salvation of men (Ps. 59:13). Why then, I ought to be baptized by Thee, if he had no need to be healed? But wonderful is the medicine in the very humility of the Lord: the one was baptizing, and the Other was healing. For if Christ is the Saviour of all men, especially of the faithful (1 Tim. 4:10): it is an apostolic and true statement that Christ is the Saviour of all men: let no one say, I have no need of a saviour. Whoever says this does not humble himself before the physician, but perishes in his disease. If He is the Saviour of all men, then of John too: for John was not other than a man. A great man indeed, but a man nonetheless. He is the Saviour of all men: and so the other acknowledges his Saviour. For it is not that Christ was not John's Saviour. He himself does not say this, who humbly confesses, saying: I ought to be baptized by Thee. And the Lord: Allow it now, let there be fulfilled all
Editors' notes and page, col. 1322

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible on the page foot› · call in col 1322

Editi, sol intelligentiæ. Vox, intelligentiæ, abest a manuscriptis.

The printed editions [read] "sun of understanding". The word "intelligentiae" is absent from the manuscripts.

(printed under page 667)

(a) ‹anchor: sed subdidit baptizando› · call in col 1322

Hic olim sermo desinebat apud Am. Er. et Lov. Reliquam partem Vignerius in Supplemento dederat, sed profecto graviter sauciam multis in locis, quæ nunc demum sanantur veterum librorum subsidio.

Here the sermon formerly ended in the Amerbach, Erasmus and Louvain editions. Vignier had given the remaining part in his Supplement, but certainly badly damaged in many places, which are now at last healed with the help of the old books.

(printed under page 667)

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXCII. 1322
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1323
justitia (Matth. III, 14, 15). Quid est, omnis justitia? Humilitate commendavit justitiam: justitiam nobis maxime humilitate magister coelestis et verus Dominus commendavit. Quod enim baptizabatur, ad humilitatem pertinebat: et ideo quod ad humilitatem pertinebat facturus, dixit: Impleatur omnis justitia.
righteousness (Matt. 3:14–15). What is "all righteousness"? He commended righteousness by humility: the heavenly Master and true Lord commended righteousness to us above all by humility. For that He was baptized belonged to humility; and therefore, being about to do what belonged to humility, He said: Let all righteousness be fulfilled.
5. Donatistae locum Evangelii de arbore et ejus fructu ad ministrum Baptismi perperam transferunt. Praevidit multos inflaturos se de ministerio Baptismi, et dicturos, Ego baptizo; et, Qualis sum ego qui baptizo, talem facio quem baptizo. Unde hoc probas? Probo, inquit. Quibus testimoniis? Evangelicis, inquit. Audiamus nescio quem novum evangelistam contra antiquum Baptistam. Quibus ergo testimoniis evangelicis probas, quod qualis es, talem facis eum quem baptizas? Quoniam scriptum est, inquit, Arbor bona bonos fructus facit. Scriptum recito, Evangelium fero: Arbor bona bonos fructus facit, arbor mala malos fructus facit (Id. VII, 17). Agnosco Evangelium: sed tu te, quantum arbitror, non agnoscis. Et ut te patienter aliquantum feram, expone quod loqueris, non me intellexisse interim deputa. Dic mihi quo pertineant haec testimonia, quid adjuvent ad solvendam hujusmodi de Baptismate quaestionem. Arbor, inquit, bona, bonus baptizator est. Arbor, inquit, bona, sicut illi dicunt: arbor bona, inquit, bonus baptizator est; fructus ejus bonus, qui ab illo baptizatur: tunc enim erit fructus bonus, si ille fuerit arbor bona. Quid dicis de Christo et Joanne? Evigila, expergiscere, perstringit oculos tuos splendor perspicuae veritatis; vide quid praemissum est ante nos; lege Evangelium: Joannes baptizavit Christum. Dicturus es, Joannes arbor, fructus Christus? Creaturam vocabis arborem, et fructum Creatorem? Ideo voluit Dominus Christus a Joanne baptizari, non ut per baptismum iniquitate careret, sed ut iniquitati os clauderet. Ecce qui baptizat, inferior est; qui baptizatur, dicturus sum, melior? Hoc forte ad me multum est intelligi. Ad homines redi, ambos vide homines. Ananias Paulum baptizavit. Anania Paulus melior fuit. Nunquam fructus arbore melior fuit. Arbor enim profert fructum, non profertur a fructu.
5. The Donatists wrongly transfer the passage of the Gospel about the tree and its fruit to the minister of Baptism. He foresaw that many would puff themselves up over the ministry of Baptism, and would say, "I baptize"; and, "Such as I am who baptize, such do I make the one whom I baptize." Whence do you prove this? "I prove it," he says. By what testimonies? "By those of the Gospel," he says. Let us hear some new evangelist or other against the ancient Baptist. By what testimonies of the Gospel, then, do you prove that such as you are, such you make him whom you baptize? "Because it is written," he says, "A good tree makes good fruits. I recite what is written, I bring forward the Gospel: A good tree makes good fruits, a bad tree makes bad fruits (Matt. 7:17)." I recognize the Gospel: but you, as far as I judge, do not recognize yourself. And so that I may bear with you patiently for a while, explain what you are saying; for the moment, take it that I have not understood. Tell me to what these testimonies pertain, how they help towards solving a question of this kind about Baptism. "The good tree," he says, "is the good baptizer." "The good tree," he says, as they put it, "the good tree," he says, "is the good baptizer; its good fruit is the one who is baptized by him: for the fruit will be good then, if he has been a good tree." What do you say of Christ and John? Wake up, rouse yourself, the brilliance of the plain truth dazzles your eyes; see what was set before us earlier; read the Gospel: John baptized Christ. Are you going to say that John is the tree, Christ the fruit? Will you call the creature the tree, and the Creator the fruit? The Lord Christ willed to be baptized by John for this reason: not so that through baptism He might be free of iniquity, but so that He might shut the mouth of iniquity. Behold, he who baptizes is the lesser; he who is baptized, am I to say, is the better? Perhaps this is too much for me to understand. Return to men, look at both as men. Ananias baptized Paul. Paul was better than Ananias. Never was fruit better than the tree. For the tree brings forth the fruit; it is not brought forth by the fruit.
6. Donatistae se pro Christo jactare convincuntur. Tu quid tibi assumas, non vides? Ipse Dominus ait: Multi venient in nomine meo dicentes, Ego sum Christus (Id. XXIV, 5). Multi errantes et seducentes venerunt in nomine Christi, nullum audivimus dicentem, Ego sum Christus. Innumerabiles haeretici venerunt omnes in nomine Christi, id est in nomine Christi palliati venerunt, parietem luteum splendido nomine dealbantes venerunt, et neminem audivimus dicentem, Ego sum Christus. Quid ergo? Dominus nescivit quid praedixit? An potius nos ad intelligendum secreta ipsa ad apertionem secreti de somno excitavit, ut perscrutemur et pulsemus, ut nobis aperiatur quod tectum est, et aperto tecto ad Dominum submittamur, ut sicut ille paralyticus, a Domino sanari mereamur (Marc. II, 3-12)? Prorsus invenimus istos dicentes, Ego sum Christus: non his verbis, sed quod pejus
6. The Donatists are convicted of boasting themselves in place of Christ. Do you not see what you are taking upon yourself? The Lord Himself says: Many will come in My name saying, I am the Christ (Matt. 24:5). Many who went astray and led astray have come in the name of Christ; we have heard none saying, "I am the Christ." Countless heretics have come, all in the name of Christ, that is, they came cloaked in the name of Christ, they came whitewashing a mud wall with a splendid name, and we have heard no one saying, "I am the Christ." What then? Did the Lord not know what He foretold? Or rather did He rouse us from sleep to understand these very hidden things, to the opening of the hidden thing, so that we might search and knock, so that what is covered might be opened to us, and, the covering opened, we might be let down to the Lord, so that, like that paralytic, we might be worthy to be healed by the Lord (Mark 2:3–12)? We certainly find these men saying, "I am the Christ": not in these words, but, what is worse
Editors' notes and page, col. 1323

Page

  • running head: S. AUGUSTINI EPISC (cut off at the image edge; column number 1323 at left)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1324
est. factus. Non audacia verborum istorum. Quis enim eos audit? Quis ad aures vel ad cor, tam insipientes deceptus admittit? Si dicat ei qui eum baptizaturus est, Ego sum Christus: avertit faciem suam ab illo, relinquit hominis arrogantiam manifestam, quaerit Dei gratiam. Non ergo ita ille, Ego sum Christus. Sed quoniam alio modo, Ego sum Christus; videte quemadmodum. Christus sanat, Christus mundat, Christus justificat: homo non justificat. Quid est justificare? Justum facere. Quomodo mortificare, mortuum facere; vivificare, vivum facere: sic et justificare, justum facere. Ecce de transverso baptizator quidam, non per januam intrans, sed per maceriam descendens; non pastor et custos, sed fur et latro; de transverso ait, Ego baptizo. Si sicut minister, audeo: noli addere; quidquid amplius est a malo est (Matth. V, 37). Et tamen addit, non dubitat. Quid addit? Ego justifico, ego justum facio. Hoc est enim, Ego sum arbor bona, ex me nascatur qui vult esse fructus bonus. Paululum, si sapienter admittis, audi; pauca verba sunt, et nisi fallor, lucida sunt. Tu ergo justificas, tu justum facis? Ergo, inquit, credat in te quem justificas. Dic, aude dicere, Crede in me; qui non dubitas dicere, Justificaris a me. Turbatur, fluctuat, excusat. Quid enim opus est, inquit, ut dicam illi, Crede in me? Crede in Christum, dico. Haesitasti, dubitasti: aliquantum ad nos dignatus es descendere. Confessus es aliquid, unde saneris. Dixisti aliquid rectum, unde prava tua caetera corrigantur. Audi jam non me, sed te. Certe enim non audes dicere, Crede in me. Absit, inquit. Et tamen audes dicere, Justifico te. Audi, et disce, quia unde non audes dicere, Crede in me; inde debes non audere dicere, Justifico te. Apostolus loquitur, cui cedes, cui velis nolis, subderis. Non enim Apostolo tanquam homini, sed ei de quo dicit Apostolus, An vultis experimentum accipere ejus, qui in me loquitur Christus (II Cor. XIII, 3)? Audi ergo non Apostolum, sed Christum per Apostolum. Quid dicit Apostolus? Credenti in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam (Rom. IV, 5). Intendite, obsecro; videte quam planum est, quam apertum est: Credenti in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam. Quisquis crediderit in eum qui justificat impium, qui de impio facit pium: quisquis ergo crediderit in eum qui justificat impium, qui justum facit eum qui impius erat, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam. Modo dic, si audes, Justifico te. Vide quomodo tibi respondi ex Apostolo: Si justificas me, credam in te; quia credenti in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides eju⟨s⟩ ad justitiam. Justificas me? credam in te. Si enim tu me justificas, ego ero credens in eum qui justificat me, id est, qui justificat impium: securus credo, quia deputatur fides mea ad justitiam. Si ergo non audes dicere, Justifico te; imo si non audes dicere, Crede in me: cave jam ne dicas, Justifico te. Perdite, inveni te; ne perdas et me e⟨t⟩ te.
made. Not the audacity of those words. For who listens to them? Who, deceived, admits such foolish things to his ears or to his heart? If the one who is going to baptize him should say to him, I am Christ, he turns his face away from him, abandons the man's manifest arrogance, and seeks the grace of God. So then he does not [say], I am Christ, in that way. But since in another way [he does say], I am Christ, see how. Christ heals, Christ cleanses, Christ justifies: man does not justify. What is it to justify? To make just. As to mortify is to make dead, to vivify to make alive, so also to justify is to make just. Behold, a certain baptizer from the side, not entering through the door but climbing down over the wall; not a shepherd and guardian, but a thief and a robber; from the side he says, I baptize. If as a minister, I venture [to allow it]: do not add; whatever is more than this is from evil (Matt. 5:37). And yet he adds, he does not hesitate. What does he add? I justify, I make just. For this is [to say], I am the good tree; let whoever wishes to be good fruit be born from me. Listen a little, if you admit [it] wisely; they are few words, and unless I am mistaken, they are clear. You then justify, you make just? Then, he says, let him whom you justify believe in you. Say it, dare to say, Believe in me, you who do not hesitate to say, You are justified by me. He is troubled, he wavers, he makes excuses. For what need is there, he says, that I should say to him, Believe in me? Believe in Christ, I say. You have hesitated, you have doubted: you have deigned to come down somewhat to us. You have confessed something by which you may be healed. You have said something right, by which your other crooked things may be corrected. Listen now not to me, but to yourself. For certainly you do not dare to say, Believe in me. Far be it, he says. And yet you dare to say, I justify you. Listen, and learn that, for the same reason that you do not dare to say, Believe in me, for that reason you ought not to dare to say, I justify you. The Apostle speaks, to whom you will yield, to whom, willing or not, you are subject. For [you are subject] not to the Apostle as to a man, but to Him of Whom the Apostle says, Do you wish to have proof of Him Who speaks in me, Christ (2 Cor. 13:3)? Hear then not the Apostle, but Christ through the Apostle. What does the Apostle say? To him who believes in Him Who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness (Rom. 4:5). Attend, I beseech you; see how plain it is, how open it is: To him who believes in Him Who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness. Whoever believes in Him Who justifies the ungodly, Who makes the ungodly godly: whoever, then, believes in Him Who justifies the ungodly, Who makes just him who was ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness. Now say, if you dare, I justify you. See how I have answered you from the Apostle: If you justify me, I will believe in you; for to him who believes in Him Who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness. Do you justify me? I will believe in you. For if you justify me, I shall be believing in him who justifies me, that is, who justifies the ungodly: I believe without anxiety, because my faith is reckoned as righteousness. If then you do not dare to say, I justify you; nay, if you do not dare to say, Believe in me: beware now of saying, I justify you. O lost one, I have found you; do not destroy both me and yourself.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1324

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible on the page foot› · call in col 1324

Aliquot Mss., audio.

Some manuscripts [read] "audio" (I hear).

(printed under page 668)

(2) ‹anchor: not visible on the page foot› · call in col 1324

Forte, inquam.

Perhaps [read] "inquam" (I say).

(printed under page 668)

Page

  • running head: [S. AURELII AU]GUSTINI EPISCOPI 1324 (left part cut off by image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1325
7. Locus Evangelii de arbore et fructu quomodo intelligendus. Nam illud quod proposuisti de arbore et de fructu, propono tibi aliquid de exemplis, ut discas intelligere quod dictum est, Arbor bona bonos fructus facit, et arbor mala malos fructus facit. Ego enim sic intelligo, quomodo et ipse Dominus exponit. Quid est, Arbor bona bonos fructus facit (Matth. VII, 17)? Bonus homo de bono thesauro cordis sui profert bona; et malus homo de malo thesauro cordis sui profert mala (Id. XII, 35). Homines arbores posuit, thesauros actus posuit. Qualis homo est, tales actus habet. Si bonus homo est, bonos actus habet; si malus homo est, malos actus habet: non potest bonus homo malos actus habere, nec malus homo bonos actus habere. Quid evidentius? quid liquidius? quid apertius? Modo autem te arborem facis bonam qui baptizas, et fructum facis eum quem baptizas; ut qualis es tu, talis sit ille. Absit ab illo, et vide quam perverse intelligis. Est apud vos aliquis, aut fuit aliquando adulter vel occultus. Sed quod nescio, inquit, non me contaminat. Non inde ago; alia quaestio est: de Baptismo volo aliquid dicere; hoc enim suscepimus. Occultus adulter est: ergo fictus est; non adulter fictus, sed adulter verus, fictus castus. Istum ergo adulterum hominem fictum, magisque fictum, quia latet; nam si apertus sit adulter, jam fictus non est: istum ergo adulterum fugiet profecto Spiritus sanctus. Evidens quippe est prolata sententia: Sanctus enim Spiritus disciplinae effugiet fictum (Sap. I, 5). Cum ergo sit iste adulter occultus, utique baptizat. Ecce video hominem baptizatum ab adultero occulto: natus est fructus; ubi est arbor bona? Baptizatus est, innocens est, facta est in illo remissio peccatorum; ergo justificatus est impius, natus est fructus bonus: quaero de qua arbore? Dic, responde mihi: arbor illa occultus adulter est, mala arbor est; si hujus arboris iste fructus, malus fructus est. Sententia Domini est, Arbor mala malos fructus facit. Respondebis, ut istum fructum bonum esse commendes, non eum de illa arbore natum. Non enim quia nescis tu illam arborem malam, ideo non est mala: tanto est pejor, quanto magis ignoratur. Tanto enim magis ignoratur, quanto perdita astutia occultat factum suum. Nam si apertus adulter esset, vel confessione sanabilis esset. Pessima arbor, et tamen ecce fructus bonus. Unde natus? an forte non natus? Natus, inquis. Quaero unde: quid dicturus es? Unde natus est iste? Non est quid dicat, nisi, De Deo: nescio utrum aliud dicturus est, quam, Ex Deo. Si hoc de omnibus diceret, et non se, cum sit arbor mala, fingendo ostenderet bonam, faceretque pejorem, de omnibus diceret quod ex Deo nascuntur; habet Evangelii evidentem sententiam: Dedit eis potestatem filios Dei fieri, qui non ex carne, non ex sanguine, non ex voluntate viri, neque ex voluntate carnis, sed ex Deo nati sunt (Joan. I. 12, 13). Ergo redi ad istum: ex Deo natus est? Ex Deo. Quare iste ex Deo? Quia fructus bonus de arbore mala nasci non potuit. Castus baptizator arbor bona est, non est fictus; vere castus baptizavit, fructus bonus de arbobona.
7. How the passage of the Gospel about the tree and the fruit is to be understood. For as to what you put forward about the tree and the fruit, I put to you something by way of examples, so that you may learn to understand what was said: A good tree makes good fruits, and a bad tree makes bad fruits. For I understand it thus, as the Lord Himself also explains it. What is: A good tree makes good fruits (Matt. 7:17)? A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things; and a bad man out of the bad treasure of his heart brings forth bad things (Matt. 12:35). He set down men as the trees, He set down their acts as the treasures. Of what sort the man is, such are the acts he has. If he is a good man, he has good acts; if he is a bad man, he has bad acts: a good man cannot have bad acts, nor a bad man have good acts. What is plainer? What is clearer? What is more open? But now you make yourself the good tree, you who baptize, and you make the fruit him whom you baptize, so that of what sort you are, such may he be. Far be it from him; and see how perversely you understand. There is among you someone, or there was at some time, an adulterer, even a secret one. But what I do not know, he says, does not defile me. I am not treating of that; that is another question: I want to say something about Baptism, for this is what we have taken up. He is a secret adulterer: therefore he is a feigner; not a feigned adulterer, but a true adulterer, a feigned chaste man. This adulterer, then, is a feigning man, and all the more feigning because he lies hidden; for if he were an open adulterer, he would no longer be feigning: this adulterer, then, the Holy Spirit will surely flee. For the sentence pronounced is plain: For the Holy Spirit of discipline will flee the feigner (Wis. 1:5). Since, then, this man is a secret adulterer, he certainly baptizes. Behold, I see a man baptized by a secret adulterer: a fruit is born; where is the good tree? He has been baptized, he is innocent, the remission of sins has been effected in him; therefore the ungodly has been justified, a good fruit is born: I ask, from what tree? Speak, answer me: that tree is a secret adulterer, it is a bad tree; if this fruit is of this tree, it is a bad fruit. It is the Lord's sentence: A bad tree makes bad fruits. You will answer, in order to commend this fruit as good, that it was not born of that tree. For it is not because you do not know that tree to be bad that it is therefore not bad: it is the worse the more it is unknown. For it is the more unknown the more it hides its deed with abandoned cunning. For if he were an open adulterer, he would at least be curable by confession. A very bad tree, and yet behold, a good fruit. Whence was it born? Or perhaps it was not born? It was born, you say. I ask whence: what are you going to say? Whence was this one born? There is nothing he can say except: Of God; I do not know whether he is going to say anything other than: From God. If he said this of all, and did not, though he is a bad tree, by feigning show himself good and make himself worse, he would say of all that they are born from God; he has the plain sentence of the Gospel: He gave them power to become sons of God, who were born not of flesh, not of blood, not of the will of man, nor of the will of the flesh, but of God (John 1:12–13). Return, then, to this one: was he born of God? Of God. Why is this one of God? Because a good fruit could not be born of a bad tree. A chaste baptizer is a good tree, he is not a feigner; a truly chaste man has baptized, a good fruit from a tree
Editors' notes and page, col. 1325

Page

  • running head: 1325 SERMO CCXCII.
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1326
Ecce et iste fructus bonus, de qua arbore natus est? Dic de mala, si audes. Non audeo, inquit. Ergo et ipse de bona? De bona. De qua bona? Ex Deo. Ille quid? Ex homine casto. Paululum intende: intelligamus quod dicimus. Iste ab homine casto baptizatus, ex arbore bona, id est, ex homine bono, natus est fructus bonus. Ille ab adultero occulto baptizatus, ex arbore mala natus est fructus, quid? Bonus. Non potest fieri. Si bonus est fructus: ergo arborem muta. Fructum istum bonum confiteris, illum hominem malum, quia occultus adulter est: arborem muta huic fructui. Mutavi, inquis: ideo dixi, Ex Deo. Jam compara istos duos natos: illum baptizavit castus manifestus; hunc baptizavit adulter occultus: ille ex homine, iste ex Deo natus est. Felicius ergo natus est ex adultero occulto, quam ille ex casto manifesto.
Behold, this one too is a good fruit: from what tree was he born? Say "from a bad one", if you dare. "I do not dare," he says. So he too is from a good one? "From a good one." From which good one? "From God." And the other? "From a chaste man." Pay attention a little: let us understand what we are saying. This one, baptized by a chaste man, was born a good fruit from a good tree, that is, from a good man. That one, baptized by a hidden adulterer, was born from a bad tree a fruit, what kind? Good. That cannot be. If the fruit is good, then change the tree. You confess that this fruit is good and that man bad, because he is a hidden adulterer: change the tree for this fruit. "I have changed it," you say: "that is why I said, From God." Now compare these two who were born: a manifest chaste man baptized that one; a hidden adulterer baptized this one: that one was born of a man, this one of God. So this one was more happily born of the hidden adulterer than that one of the manifest chaste man.
8. Ex Joannis et Apostoli verbis Donatistas redarguit. Melius ergo Joannem audis, o haeretice; melius audis praecursorem recursor; melius audis humilem, o superbe; melius audis lucernam ardentem, o lucerna exstincta. Audi Joannem, cum veniretur ad eum: « Ego quidem baptizo vos in aqua. » Et tu, si te agnoscas, minister es aquae. « Ego, » inquit, « baptizo vos in aqua; qui veniet autem, major me est. » Quantum major te est? « Cujus non sum dignus corrigiam calceamenti solvere. » Quantum se humiliaret, si se dignum diceret? Ne hoc quidem dixit dignum se esse, corrigiam calceamenti solvere. Ipse est qui baptizat in Spiritu sancto (Luc. III, 16, et Joan. I, 27, 33). Quid te pro Christo supponis? Ipse baptizat in Spiritu sancto. Ergo ipse justificat. Tu quid dicis? Ego baptizo in Spiritu sancto, ego justifico. Certe non dicis, Ego sum Christus? Certe non es de illis, de quibus dictum est, Multi venient in nomine meo dicentes, Ego sum Christus (Matth. XXIV, 5)? Captus es: atque utinam vel captus inveniaris, qui non captus perieras. Bonum est ad escam magni regis capi retibus veritatis. Noli ergo jam dicere, Ego justifico, ego sanctifico: ne convincaris dicere, Ego sum Christus. Dic potius quod amicus sponsi, non qui te velis jactare pro sponso: Neque qui plantat est aliquid, neque qui rigat; sed qui incrementum dat Deus (I Cor. III, 7). Audi etiam et ipsum, de quo agimus, amicum sponsi. Certe cum Christo quasi discipulos habebat, et Christi discipulus non erat: audi illum confitentem se Christi discipulum. Vide illum inter Christi discipulos, et tanto certiorem, quanto humiliorem; tanto humiliorem, quanto majorem. Vide illum facientem quod scriptum est, Quanto magnus es, tanto humilia te in omnibus, et coram Deo invenies gratiam (Eccli. III, 20). Jam dixit, Non sum dignus corrigiam calceamenti solvere: sed non in hoc se discipulum demonstravit. Qui de coelo, inquit, venit, super omnes est (Joan. III, 31): nos autem omnes de plenitudine ejus accepimus (Id. I, 16). Ergo et ipse inter discipulos erat, qui cum Christo discipulos colligebat. Audi apertius fatentem se discipulum: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est; amicus autem sponsi stat, et audit eum (Id. III, 29). Et ideo
8. From the words of John and of the Apostle he refutes the Donatists. Better, then, that you listen to John, O heretic; better that you, a runner-back, listen to the forerunner; better that you listen to the humble man, O proud one; better that you listen to the burning lamp, O extinguished lamp. Listen to John, when people came to him: "I indeed baptize you in water." You too, if you would recognize yourself, are a minister of water. "I," he says, "baptize you in water; but He who will come is greater than I." How much greater than you is He? "Whose shoe-strap I am not worthy to untie." How much would he have humbled himself, if he had called himself worthy? He did not even say that he was worthy to untie the strap of His shoe. He it is Who baptizes in the Holy Spirit (Luke 3:16, and John 1:27, 33). Why do you put yourself in the place of Christ? He baptizes in the Holy Spirit. Therefore He justifies. What do you say? "I baptize in the Holy Spirit, I justify." Surely you do not say, "I am the Christ"? Surely you are not one of those of whom it was said, Many will come in my name saying, I am the Christ (Matt. 24:5)? You are caught: and would that you might at least be found caught, you who, uncaught, had perished. It is good to be caught in the nets of truth to be food for the great king. Do not, then, go on saying, "I justify, I sanctify": lest you be convicted of saying, "I am the Christ." Say rather what the friend of the bridegroom says, not one who would boast of himself in place of the bridegroom: Neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters; but God Who gives the increase (1 Cor. 3:7). Listen also to the very one we are dealing with, the friend of the bridegroom. Certainly he had, as it were, disciples alongside Christ, and was not a disciple of Christ: listen to him confessing himself a disciple of Christ. See him among the disciples of Christ, and the more certain the more humble; the more humble the greater he is. See him doing what is written, The greater you are, the more humble yourself in all things, and you will find grace before God (Sir. 3:20). He has already said, I am not worthy to untie the strap of His shoe: but in this he did not show himself a disciple. He Who comes from heaven, he says, is above all (John 3:31): and we have all received of His fullness (John 1:16). So he too was among the disciples, he who was gathering disciples alongside Christ. Hear him confessing himself a disciple more openly: He who has the bride is the bridegroom; but the friend of the bridegroom stands and hears Him (John 3:29). And therefore
Editors' notes and page, col. 1326

Footnotes

(1) ‹anchor: not visible on the page foot› · call in col 1326

Vign., præcursor. At plerique Mss., recursor.

Vignier [reads] "praecursor" (forerunner). But most manuscripts [read] "recursor" [so the scan appears to print; the first letters are faint].

(printed under page 669)

Page

  • running head: SERMO CCXCII. 1326 (initial S cut off at the image edge; column number printed faintly, reads 1326)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
PL 38:1327
stat, quia audit eum. Stat et audit; quia si non audiat, cadit. Merito ille, Auditui meo dabis, inquit, exsultationem et laetitiam. Quid est, auditui meo? Audire illum, non audiri velle pro illo. Et ut noverimus quia in eo quod audit eum, humilitatem commendat: cum dixisset, Auditui meo dabis exsultationem et laetitiam; continuo subjunxit, et exsultabunt ossa humiliata (Psal. L, 10). Stat ergo et audit eum. Exsultabunt ossa humiliata, quia franguntur elata. Nullus ergo sibi servus potestatem Domini assumat. Gaudeat se esse in familia, et si est praepositus, proferat in tempore conservis cibaria (Matth. XXIV, 45); sed unde et ipse vivat, non ut de ipso illi vivant. Nam quid est proferre in tempore cibaria, nisi proferre Christum, laudare Christum, commendare Christum, praedicare Christum? hoc est, proferre in tempore cibaria. Nam ut esset ipse Christus cibaria jumentorum suorum, natus in praesepi positus est.
stands, because he hears Him. He stands and hears; because if he does not hear, he falls. Rightly does that man say, To my hearing Thou wilt give exultation and gladness. What is "to my hearing"? To hear Him, not to wish to be heard in His place. And so that we might know that in the fact that he hears Him he commends humility: when he had said, To my hearing Thou wilt give exultation and gladness, he immediately added, and the humbled bones shall exult (Ps. 50:10). So he stands and hears Him. The humbled bones shall exult, because the lofty are broken. Let no servant, therefore, take to himself the power of the Lord. Let him rejoice that he is in the household, and if he is set over it, let him bring out food for his fellow servants in due time (Matt. 24:45); but food on which he himself may also live, not so that they may live off him. For what is it to bring out food in due time, if not to bring out Christ, to praise Christ, to commend Christ, to preach Christ? This is to bring out food in due time. For so that Christ Himself might be the food of His beasts, when He was born He was laid in a manger.
Editors' notes and page, col. 1327

Page

  • running head: 1327 S. AUGUSTINI EPIS[...] (cut off at the image edge)
  • marginal letters: (none)
  • old-edition numerals: (none)
  • other: the column continues with SERMO CCXCIII. (another unit); not set here
  • other: foot notes (*), (a), (b) on page 670 are all called in the title lines of Sermon 293 (a later unit), not in this unit; removed by QA Q1.