PL 4 · cols. 235–239
Cyprianus, Epistolae II-XXI
Letter VI
Migne Reading Room
PL 4 · cols. 235–239
Letter VI
LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 113)
(a) ‹—› · call in col 236
Fortiter NC. 2.
"Fortiter" ("bravely") NC. 2.
(printed under page 113)
(a) ‹perseveranti› · call in col 236
Fortiter NC. 2.
"Fortiter" ("strongly") NC. 2.
(printed under page 113)
(b) ‹deterius fiat› · call in col 236
Aliquid tibi deterius contingat Bod. 1.
"Something worse befall you" Bod. 1.
(printed under page 113)
(c) ‹tenere potuerunt› · call in col 236
Non ambulaverunt, datam... non potuerunt Lam. Ebor. NC. 1. Bod. 1, 3.
"Did not walk, ... the [grace] given ... they could not" Lam., Ebor., NC. 1, Bod. 1, 3.
(printed under page 113)
(d) ‹respicit› · call in col 236
Prospicit Ebor. NC. 1. Recipit Lin.
"Prospicit" ("looks forth to") Ebor., NC. 1; "Recipit" ("receives") Lin.
(printed under page 113)
(e) ‹confessores› · call in col 236
Confessores in terra Lam. NC. 1.
"Confessors on earth" Lam., NC. 1.
STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE. (Baluze) ‹Epist. VI.— I.— Rogatiano› · lemma note EPIST. VI. — I. — Rogatiano. Censuit Pamelius hunc Rogatianum fuisse diversum ab eo cui inscripta est Epistola LXXXI, quem editiones quaedam et quidam libri veteres vocant juvenem, et ex illa Epistola collegit Rogatianum ad quem ista data est, martyrio consummatum fuisse eo tempore quo altera scripta est, quia sanctus Cyprianus ait illum caeteris confessoribus hospitium praeparasse in carcere, in quem conjectus erat cum Felicissimo, et nunc quoque eos antecedere. Ista quidem videntur ostendere Rogatianum fuisse martyrii candidatum. Sed non probant eum subiisse martyrium.
Letter VI. — I. — "Rogatiano" (to Rogatianus). Pamelius judged that this Rogatianus was different from the one to whom Letter 81 is addressed, whom some editions and some old books call "the younger"; and he gathered from that letter that the Rogatianus to whom this one was sent had been perfected by martyrdom at the time the other was written, because Saint Cyprian says that he had prepared lodging for the other confessors in the prison, into which he had been thrown with Felicissimus, and that he now too goes before them. These things do seem to show that Rogatianus was a candidate for martyrdom. But they do not prove that he underwent martyrdom.
(Baluze) ‹Praepositi gloria› · lemma note Praepositi gloria. Quidam libri veteres habent honor.
"Praepositi gloria" (the glory of the one set over [you]). Some old books have "honor" (honour).
(Baluze) ‹II.— Devita nostra› · lemma note II. — Devita nostra. Id est, quotidie sumus in periculo vitae nostrae. Hic est verus et genuinus horum verborum sensus. Non possum igitur assentiri Rigaltio scribenti istic agi de vita aeterna. Nihilo magis verum est haec verba ex Epistola XIII, pag. 23, vitae ipsi omnium nostrum convenit, habere eum sensum. In Epistola XXVI, pag. 56, scriptum est : Propter te interficimur tota die, pro eo quod in capite octavo Epistolae ad Romanos legitur : Propter te mortificamur tota die. Hieronymus, in Epistola ad Rusticum : Nihil Christiano laboriosius, qui de vita quotidie periclitatur. Idem, in Epistola ad Suniam et Fretelam, tractans de loco illo Psalmi CXVIII, Anima mea in manibus meis semper, ait istius loci hunc esse sensum : Quotidie periclitor, et quasi in manibus meis sanguinem meum porto. Caius Caesar apud Salustium in Catilina : Libertas et anima nostra in dubio est.
II. — "Devita nostra" (concerning our life). That is, we are daily in peril of our life. This is the true and genuine sense of these words. I cannot therefore agree with Rigault, who writes that eternal life is meant here. Nor is it any truer that these words from Letter 13, p. 23, "it befits the very life of all of us," have that sense. In Letter 26, p. 56, is written: "For your sake we are slain all the day long," for what is read in the eighth chapter of the Letter to the Romans: "For your sake we are put to death all the day long." Jerome, in the Letter to Rusticus: "Nothing is more toilsome for a Christian, who is daily in peril of his life." The same, in the Letter to Sunnia and Fretela, treating that place of Psalm 118, "My soul is always in my hands," says this is the sense of the passage: "Daily I am in peril, and carry my blood as it were in my hands." Gaius Caesar in Sallust's Catiline: "Our liberty and our life are in doubt."
(Baluze) ‹Posse servare› · lemma note Posse servare. Ovidius, lib. II de Arte amandi : Non minor est virtus quam quaerere parta tueri. Julius Caesar in Oratione ad suos legatos et centuriones apud Dionem Cassium lib. XXXVIII, ait iisdem artibus et quaeri bona et retineri. Et M. Antonius, in oratione funebri in Caesarem, apud eumdem Dionem lib. XLIV, scribit difficilius esse conservare res quam parare. Quod etiam sensisse Maecenatem liquet ex Oratione ejus ad Augustum in libro LII ejusdem Dionis. Apud T. Livium : Vincere scis, Hannibal, victoria uti nescis.
"Posse servare" (to be able to keep). Ovid, Art of Love book 2: "It is no less a virtue to guard what has been won than to seek it." Julius Caesar, in his speech to his legates and centurions in Dio Cassius book 38, says that goods are both sought and kept by the same arts. And Mark Antony, in the funeral oration for Caesar, in the same Dio book 44, writes that it is harder to preserve things than to acquire them. That Maecenas also thought so is clear from his speech to Augustus in book 52 of the same Dio. In Titus Livy: "You know how to conquer, Hannibal; you do not know how to use victory."
(Baluze) ‹Puta hoc illum› · lemma note Puta hoc illum. Membrum hoc deerat in antiquis editionibus. Erasmus restituit. Exstat autem in multis codicibus antiquis. Deest in codice sancti Arnulphi.
"Puta hoc illum" (suppose that he). This clause was missing in the ancient editions. Erasmus restored it. It is found in many ancient manuscripts. It is missing in the manuscript of Saint-Arnoul.
(Baluze) ‹III.— Implere confessores› · lemma note III. — Implere confessores. Rigaltius scripsit implere vos confessores. Ego vero vocem vos, quae neque in antiquis editionibus habetur neque in antiquis codicibus, sustuli. Scio illam nihil officere sententiae Cypriani. Sed, quia alibi non inveni quam in editione Rigaltiana, existimavi esse tollendam. Id vero admoneo ne quis imputet mihi temeritatem, (continues)
III. — "Implere confessores" (that confessors fulfil). Rigault wrote "implere vos confessores" (that you confessors fulfil). I, however, have removed the word "vos," which is found neither in the ancient editions nor in the ancient manuscripts. I know it does no harm to Cyprian's meaning. But since I found it nowhere but in Rigault's edition, I judged it should be removed. I give this notice so that no one may charge me with rashness, (continues)
(printed under page 113)
LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 114)
(a) ‹—› · call in col 237
Conversationem vestram Pem.
"Your way of life" Pem.
(printed under page 114)
(b) ‹gentiles› · call in col 237
Inter gentes Ebor. NC. 1. Lam.
"Among the nations" Ebor., NC. 1, Lam.
(printed under page 114)
(c) ‹honore› · call in col 237
A confessionis ipsius honore Bod. 3. Lin.
"From the honour of confession itself" Bod. 3, Lin.
(printed under page 114)
(d) ‹laudis› · call in col 237
Conversationis et laudis Lam. Ebor. NC. 1. Bod. 1. 2.
"Of [your] way of life and praise" Lam., Ebor., NC. 1, Bod. 1, 2.
(printed under page 114)
(e) ‹—› · call in col 238 (Q3b: no call e is printed in col 237; this variant belongs to n238, check it is there)
Contradicens Lin. NC. 1. 2.
"Contradicens" ("contradicting") Lin., NC. 1, 2.
(printed under page 114)
(e) ‹contradico› · call in col 238
Contradicens Lin. NC. 1. 2.
"Contradicting" Lin., NC. 1, 2.
(printed under page 114)
(f) ‹quae ille gessit› · call in col 238
Ille in lege gessit Voss. 2.
"He did in the law" Voss. 2.
(printed under page 114)
(g) ‹quisque› · call in col 238
Quanto quisque Pem. Quanto quisquis Oxon.
"The more each one" Pem.; "the more whoever" Oxon.
STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE. (Baluze) ‹Lucete sicut› · lemma note Lucete sicut. Vide annotationes Erasmi in caput secundum Epistolae Pauli ad Philippenses.
"Lucete sicut" (shine as). See Erasmus's annotations on the second chapter of Paul's Letter to the Philippians.
(Baluze) ‹Detrectant› · lemma note Detrectant. Ita nos reposuimus, secuti lectionem meliorum librorum et veterum editionum. Codex Fuxensis et editio Rigaltii habent retractant. Sed in lingua latina aliud est retractare, aliud detrectare. T. Livius lib. XXXVIII : Caeca est invidia, nec quicquam aliud scit quam detrectare virtutes. In eumdem sensum Apuleius in libro primo Floridorum : In magna civitate hoc quoque genus invenitur, qui meliores obtrectare malint quam imitari.
"Detrectant" (they disparage). So we have restored it, following the reading of the better books and the old editions. The Foix manuscript and Rigault's edition have "retractant" (they handle again). But in Latin "retractare" is one thing, "detrectare" another. Livy, book 38: "Envy is blind and knows nothing else but to disparage virtues." To the same sense Apuleius in the first book of the Florida: "In a great city this sort too is found, who would rather disparage their betters than imitate them."
(Baluze) ‹IV.— Aliquis temulentus› · lemma note IV. — Aliquis temulentus. Antea legebatur alius ab aquis tumulentus, id est a Baptismo, ut interpretatur Rigaltius. Aliae editiones, ut idem annotat, habent quando alius aliquis vel quando unus aliquis. Quae postrema lectio extat in codice Thuano. Vetus codex sancti Remigii Remensis habet, apud aquas ; Corbeiensis, apud aquas temulentus ; Turonensis, quando unus apud aquas. Angli retinuerunt veterem editionem, nullam aliam auctoritatem afferentes pro lectione supposita a Rigaltio quam ipsius Rigaltii, cujus tamen refellunt lectionem. Reinhartus quoque revocavit veterem lectionem. Ego secutus sum auctoritatem codicis Seguieriani, Metensis, Beccensis, Gratianopolitani et Lamoniani.
IV. — "Aliquis temulentus" (someone drunken). Formerly one read "alius ab aquis tumulentus" (another, swollen from the waters), that is, from Baptism, as Rigault interprets. Other editions, as he also notes, have "when some other" or "when some one." This last reading is in the de Thou manuscript. The old manuscript of Saint-Remi at Reims has "at the waters"; the Corbie one, "drunken at the waters"; the Tours one, "when one at the waters." The English kept the old edition, bringing no other authority for the reading put forward by Rigault than Rigault's own, whose reading they nevertheless refute. Reinhart too restored the old reading. I have followed the authority of the Séguier, Metz, Bec, Grenoble and Lamoignon manuscripts.
(Baluze) ‹Demoratur› · lemma note Demoratur. Haec lectio constans est in editionibus tam antiquis quam novis, et in antiquis exemplaribus manuscriptis. Et tamen Goulartius annotat nonnullos scribere denotatur, et in margine libri sui excusi scripsit ita legere Bezam. Hanc quoque variam lectionem notavit Reinhartus in margine suae editionis, ex Rigaltio nimirum, qui in observationibus suis ait quaedam Cypriani exemplaria habere denotatur. Sed ego eam lectionem non inveni nisi in uno codice Vaticano citato in margine exemplaris mei editionis Manutianae et in exemplari editionis Pamelianae quod fuit Nicolai Fabri. Sic etiam in margine editionis Lugdunensis anni 1550, scriptum reperi a quodam studioso. Existimat autem Goulartius lectionem demoratur, si retineatur, posse idem significare quod moratur, prima longa, id est insanit, seu morionem agit, quod a Graecis sumptum esse ait et a Suetonio usurpatum in Nerone.
"Demoratur" (lingers). This reading is constant in editions old and new, and in the ancient manuscript copies. Yet Goulart notes that some write "denotatur" (is branded), and in the margin of his printed book wrote that Beza reads so. Reinhart also noted this variant in the margin of his edition, evidently from Rigault, who says in his observations that some copies of Cyprian have "denotatur." But I have found that reading only in one Vatican manuscript cited in the margin of my copy of the Manutius edition, and in the copy of the Pamelius edition that belonged to Nicolas Lefèvre. So too I found it written by some scholar in the margin of the Lyons edition of 1550. Goulart thinks that the reading "demoratur," if kept, can mean the same as "moratur" with the first syllable long, that is, "he raves" or "plays the fool," which he says was taken from the Greeks and used by Suetonius in the Nero.
(Baluze) ‹Apprehensus› · lemma note Apprehensus. Reposui vocem quae melius convenire visa est cum stylo Cypriani. Quidam enim vetusti codices et quaedam editiones habent ut deprehensus ; alii, et ii quidem optimi, unde apprehensus. Vide quae notavi ad librum de Lapsis.
"Apprehensus" (seized). I have restored the word that seemed better to suit Cyprian's style. For some very old manuscripts and some editions have "ut deprehensus" (as one caught); others, and those the best, "unde apprehensus" (whence seized). See what I noted on the book On the Lapsed.
(Baluze) ‹Quasi Christianus› · lemma note Quasi Christianus. Apud Rufinum, lib. V Hist. eccles. c. 8, refertur ex 893 Apollonio Alexandrum socium Priscae prophetissae, qui semetipse martyrem dicebat, judicatum fuisse apud Aemilium Frontinum proconsulem Ephesi, non propter nomen Christi, sed propter quaedam latrocinia. Ante Cyprianum sanctus Petrus dixerat in Epistola sua prima cap. IV : Nec quisquam vestrum tamquam fur aut homicida patiatur, aut tamquam maleficus, aut curas alienas agens, sed tamquam Christianus.
"Quasi Christianus" (as a Christian). In Rufinus, Ecclesiastical History book 5, chapter 8, it is reported from Apollonius [the "893" printed here is as in Migne] that Alexander, companion of the prophetess Prisca, who called himself a martyr, was judged before Aemilius Frontinus, proconsul at Ephesus, not for the name of Christ, but for certain robberies. Before Cyprian, Saint Peter had said in his First Letter, chapter 4: "Let none of you suffer as a thief or a murderer, or as an evildoer, or as a meddler in others' affairs, but as a Christian."
(Baluze) ‹V.— Dei templa› · lemma note V. — Dei templa. Hieronymus, in Epistola ad Paulinum de Institutione monachi : Verum Christi templum anima credentis est.
V. — "Dei templa" (temples of God). Jerome, in the Letter to Paulinus on the Formation of a Monk: "The true temple of Christ is the soul of the believer."
(Baluze) ‹Cubilia cum feminis› · lemma note Cubilia cum feminis. Rem tractat valde periculosam, ut notat etiam Marbodus, episcopus Redonensis in Epistola ad Robertum de Arbrissello. Nam, quia ille nimio continentiae zelo inter duas puellas nocte cubare ferebatur, et eo modo conabatur accensum carnis ardorem extinguere, novo et inaudito, ut ad eum scribit Goffridus abbas Vindocinensis, sed infructuoso genere martyrii ; addit Goffridus illud nullo modo posse esse utile neque fructuosum quod contra rationem noscitur esse praesumptum. Videtur autem Goffridus id quod dixit de novo martyrii ge- (continues)
"Cubilia cum feminis" (beds with women). He treats a very dangerous matter, as Marbod, bishop of Rennes, also notes in the Letter to Robert of Arbrissel. For since that man was said, out of excessive zeal for continence, to lie at night between two girls, and in that way to try to quench the kindled ardour of the flesh, by a new and unheard-of, as Geoffrey abbot of Vendôme writes to him, but fruitless kind of martyrdom, Geoffrey adds that what is known to have been presumed against reason can in no way be useful or fruitful. Geoffrey seems, however, to have taken what he said about a new kind of martyr- (continues)
(printed under page 114)
LECTIONES VARIANTES. (printed under page 115)
(a) ‹—› · call in col 239
Foeminis permisceant Lin. NC. 1.
"Let them mingle with women" Lin., NC. 1.
(printed under page 115)
(b) ‹—› · call in col 239
Exempla monstrantur Lam. nascantur Bod. 1. Ebor. Lin.
"Examples are shown" Lam.; "may arise" Bod. 1, Ebor., Lin.
(printed under page 115)
(c) ‹—› · call in col 239
A conviciis maledicis NC. 2. Lam.
"From abusive insults" NC. 2, Lam.
(printed under page 115)
(d) ‹Saeculo renuntiaveramus› · call in col 239
Saeculo renuntiamus Bod. 1. 2. Ebor. NC. 1. 2.
"We renounce the world" Bod. 1, 2, Ebor., NC. 1, 2.
(printed under page 115)
(e) ‹exhortationibus› · call in col 239
Exhortationibus et precibus Lin. NC. 2.
"By exhortations and prayers" Lin., NC. 2.
(printed under page 115)
(f) ‹correctos› · call in col 239
Incorruptos Bod.
"Incorruptos" ("uncorrupted") Bod.
STEPH. BALUZII NOTAE. (Baluze) ‹Cubilia cum feminis› · lemma note
(continued) nere mutuatus ex libro primo sancti Ambrosii de Virginibus, cap. 2, ubi loquens de sancta Agnete, Novum martyrii genus, inquit. Nondum idonea poenae, et jam matura victoriae, certare difficilis, facilis coronari, etc. Eleganter, ut solet, et prudenter Hieronymus in Epistola ad Laetam de Institutione filiae : Quidam putant majoris esse virtutis praesentem contemnere voluptatem. Tamen ego arbitror securioris continentiae esse nescire quod quaerat.
(Baluze) ‹Promiscua› · lemma note Promiscua. Haec lectio, quam omnes editiones habent, quam confirmant libri veteres, optima est. Et tamen Rigaltius ei bonae lectioni praetulit erroneam quae exstat in codice Thuano ; in quo, omissa una litterula a librario, scriptum est promisca. Erratum est igitur in editione Anglicana, ubi adnotatum est in codice Thuano scriptum esse promiscua, cum contra Rigaltius in observationibus suis rationem reddiderit cur hanc lectionem rejecerit. Apud A. Gellium legitur promisca, impromisca, impromisce in editione Henrici Stephani. Nicolaus Perottus pag. 752, 1185, adnotat veteres promiscam pro promiscue scripsisse. Promisce legi apud Macrobium pro promiscue in editione Henrici Stephani.
"Promiscua" (indiscriminate). This reading, which all editions have and the old books confirm, is the best. Yet Rigault preferred to this good reading the erroneous one found in the de Thou manuscript, in which, one little letter having been omitted by the copyist, "promisca" is written. There is therefore an error in the English edition, where it is noted that "promiscua" is written in the de Thou manuscript, whereas on the contrary Rigault in his observations gave his reason for rejecting this reading. In Aulus Gellius one reads "promisca, impromisca, impromisce" in Henri Estienne's edition. Niccolò Perotti, pp. 752, 1185, notes that the ancients wrote "promiscam" for "promiscue." I have read "promisce" for "promiscue" in Macrobius in Henri Estienne's edition.
(Baluze) ‹Lingua quae Christum› · lemma note Lingua quae Christum. Idem Cyprianus in libro de Exhortatione martyrii cap. 11 : Producta et exsecta prius lingua quae confessa Deum fuerat. Plinius, lib. VII, cap. 23 : Anaxarchus cum torqueretur, praecisam dentibus linguam unamque opem indicii in tyranni os expuit. Eamdem historiam fusius refert Valerius Maximus lib. III, cap. 3. Vide Cujacium, lib. XIX Observat. cap. 6.
"Lingua quae Christum" (the tongue that [confessed] Christ). The same Cyprian, in the book On the Exhortation to Martyrdom, chapter 11: "The tongue that had confessed God was first drawn out and cut off." Pliny, book 7, chapter 23: "Anaxarchus, when he was being tortured, bit off his tongue with his teeth and spat it, his one means of informing, into the tyrant's face." Valerius Maximus tells the same story more fully, book 3, chapter 3. See Cujas, Observations book 19, chapter 6.
(Baluze) ‹VI.— Et quamquam clero› · lemma note VI. — Et quamquam clero. Tamenetsi Rigaltius, qui primus hoc segmentum reperit in codice sancti Remigii, illud cum ipsa epistola non ediderit, sed retulerit inter observationes ; tamenetsi Angli secuti sint exemplum Rigaltii, ego illud attexui epistolae, non dubitans quin sit Cypriani, quamvis in uno tantum veteri libro repertum sit. Reinhartus non attexuit epistolae, sed addidit in calce, admonens Rigaltium edidisse ex codice Remensi.
VI. — "Et quamquam clero" (and although to the clergy). Although Rigault, who first found this segment in the manuscript of Saint-Remi, did not publish it with the letter itself but placed it among his observations; although the English followed Rigault's example, I have joined it to the letter, not doubting that it is Cyprian's, though it has been found in only one old book. Reinhart did not join it to the letter but added it at the end, noting that Rigault had published it from the Reims manuscript.
(Baluze) ‹Sumpticulis propriis› · lemma note Sumpticulis propriis. Vel de quantitate propria, ut in Epistola XXXVI, pag. 49, loquitur ipse Cyprianus, id est ex bonis quae erant Caecilii Cypriani, quorum mentio est in Epistola LXIX ad Florentium. Non puto enim istud esse intelligendum de ea parte reddituum Ecclesiae quae ad episcopum pertinebat, nondum inventa divisione bonorum, quia Ecclesia nondum habebat divitias atque opes. Ea tum sustentabatur oblationibus fidelium, quae gratuitae erant ac voluntariae, non coactae. Tertullianus in Apologetico : Modicam unusquisque stipem menstrua die, vel cum velis, et si modo possis, apponit. Nam nemo compellitur, sed sponte confert. Haec quasi deposita pietatis sunt. Nam inde non epulis nec potaculis nec ingratis veretrinis dispensatur, sed egenis alendis humandisque. Habuisse Cyprianum bona constat : de hortis ab eo venditis inter initia fidei suae et Dei indulgentia restitutis testatur ipse Cyprianus Epist. LXIII, et Pontius diaconus in Vita ejus.
"Sumpticulis propriis" (from my own small means). Or "de quantitate propria" (from my own amount), as Cyprian himself speaks in Letter 36, p. 49; that is, from the goods that belonged to Caecilius Cyprianus, which are mentioned in Letter 69 to Florentius. For I do not think this is to be understood of that part of the Church's revenues which belonged to the bishop, the division of goods not yet having been devised, because the Church did not yet have riches and wealth. It was then supported by the offerings of the faithful, which were free and voluntary, not compelled. Tertullian in the Apologeticum: "Each one puts in a modest coin on the monthly day, or when he wishes, and only if he is able. For no one is compelled, but gives of his own accord. These are as it were the deposits of piety. For from them nothing is spent on feasts or drinking-bouts or thankless eating-houses, but on feeding and burying the needy." That Cyprian had goods is certain: Cyprian himself testifies in Letter 63, and Pontius the deacon in his Life, to the gardens he sold at the beginning of his faith and that were restored by God's kindness.
(Baluze) ‹Opto vos› · lemma note Opto vos. Retinui editionem vulgatam, quae bona est. Admoneo tamen editionem Spirensem, veterem Venetam, eam quae est Remboltii, Erasmicam, et Morellianam praeferre Opto te, frater, et ita etiam scripdum esse in sedecim codicibus antiquis. Et haec quoque lectio optima est. Tamenetsi enim epistola scripta sit ad plures, praecipue tamen et nominatim scripta est ad Rogatianum, personam illustrem. Et ideo Cyprianus finem ei imponens, clausulam valedictoriam, ut solet, ad eum dirigere potuit.
"Opto vos" (I wish you [pl.]). I have kept the common edition, which is good. I note, however, that the Speyer edition, the old Venetian one, Rembolt's, Erasmus's and Morel's show "Opto te, frater" (I wish you, brother), and that it is so written in sixteen ancient manuscripts. And this reading too is excellent. For although the letter was written to several, it was written chiefly and by name to Rogatianus, a person of distinction. And so Cyprian, closing it, could direct the farewell formula to him, as he usually does.
(Baluze) ‹Epist. VII.— De precando Deo› · lemma note 394 EPIST. VII. — De precando Deo. Miror Rigaltium, qui sciebat sanctum Augustinum, l. IV de Baptismo contra Donatistas, c. 2, ea verba referre tamquam Cypriani, sciebat praeterea ea haberi in quibusdam antiquis editionibus ; miror, inquam, eum illa omisisse in sua, (continues)
[The "394" printed here is as in Migne.] Letter VII. — "De precando Deo" (On praying to God). I am surprised at Rigault, who knew that Saint Augustine, On Baptism against the Donatists book 4, chapter 2, cites these words as Cyprian's, and knew besides that they are found in some ancient editions; I am surprised, I say, that he omitted them in his own, (continues)
(printed under page 115)