PL 54 · cols. 1121–1124
Leo the Great, Letters
Letters CLI–CLIV
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 1121–1124
Letters CLI–CLIV
(a) ‹quaeque fraternitati› · printed under col 1121
Quesnellus, tuae. Cur Ratisponensis lectionem hic quoque praetulerimus, vide annot. 2 (Col. 1119, n. d) in epist. praecedentem.
Quesnel has tuae. For why we have preferred the reading of the Regensburg manuscript here too, see annotation 2 (col. 1119, n. d) on the preceding letter.
(b) ‹vocaretur episcopale› · printed under col 1121
Ita cod. Grim., non autem judicium, uti Quesnellus ex arbitrio edidit. Confer not. 4 (Col. 1119, n. c) in epist. praecedentem
So the Grimani manuscript, and not judicium, as Quesnel printed at his own discretion. Compare note 4 (col. 1119, n. c) on the preceding letter.
(c) ‹Datum› · printed under col 1121
Quesnellus, decimo kal. Sept. Ex Ratisp. emendavimus. Confer admonit. num. 3.
Quesnel has decimo kal. Sept. We have corrected it from the Regensburg manuscript. Compare the admonition, no. 3.
(d) ‹EPISTOLA› · printed under col 1121
Scripta 1 Septemb. an. 457.
Written 1 September in the year 457.
(e) ‹AD ANATOLIUM› · printed under col 1121 (the call stands before the address line)
Nunc primum prodit ex ms. Ratisp., atque indicatur epistolis 157, c. 4 et 163, ubi de Attici causa sermo est.
It now appears for the first time, from the Regensburg manuscript, and it is indicated in letters 157, ch. 4, and 163, where the case of Atticus is discussed.
(f) printed under this column; its call is in col 1122, set in n1122. (g) printed under this column, running on under col 1122; its call is in col 1122, set in n1122.
Nunc primum edita ex ms. Ratisponensi.
Now published for the first time from the Regensburg manuscript.
SYNOPSIS. — Ipsum laudat, et ut Ecclesiam Constantinopolitanam ab haeresi purget hortatur. De Attico presbytero discutiendo.
SYNOPSIS. — He praises him, and exhorts him to purge the Church of Constantinople of heresy. On examining the presbyter Atticus.
(f) ‹virum Patricium› · printed under col 1121
Exstat ad imperatorem epistola 148. At quae ab Patricium Asparem data fuit desideratur.
The letter to the emperor survives, letter 148. But the one that was given to the Patrician Aspar is lost.
(g) ‹testantur, quibus› · printed under col 1121, running on under col 1122
Haec innuunt Anatolii litteras, quibus is de Eutychianorum Alexandrinorum motibus Leonem instruxerat; sed hae quoque desiderantur.
These words hint at the letters of Anatolius by which he had informed Leo of the disturbances of the Alexandrian Eutychians; but these too are lost.
(h) ‹famae perferrentium› · printed under col 1122
Hinc cognoscitur et prudentia et moderatio S. Leonis in causa Attici, quantumque in ea Anatolio detulerit, cui discutienda ea quae ad me, inquit epist. 163, erant perlata, commisi, hac scilicet epistola 151.
From this are recognized both the prudence and the moderation of St Leo in the case of Atticus, and how much he deferred to Anatolius in it: "to whom," he says in letter 163, "I entrusted the examination of what had been brought to me", namely by this letter 151.
(i) ‹EPISTOLA› · printed under col 1122
Alias 120. Scripta 1 Septembr. an. 457.
Formerly 120. Written 1 September in the year 457.
(j) ‹AD JULIANUM› · printed under col 1122 (the call stands before the address line)
Ex cod. Grimanico editam cum Ratisponensi contulimus.
We have collated with the Regensburg manuscript the letter published from the Grimani manuscript.
(k) ‹ecclesiasticis, et› · printed under col 1122
Praepositionem in ex Ratisp. addidimus.
We have added the preposition in from the Regensburg manuscript.
(l) ‹metropolitanos› · printed under col 1122
Epist. 149 et 150.
Letters 149 and 150.
(m) ‹Aetii presbyteri› · printed under col 1122
Ratisp. cod., debebit.
The Regensburg manuscript has debebit.
(n) ‹libenter tuebitur› · printed under col 1122
Quam scilicet imperator declaravit in litteris initio imperii sui editis, de quibus vide annot. 11 (Col. 1114, n. l) in epist. 145.
That is, the judgement the emperor declared in the letters issued at the beginning of his reign, on which see annotation 11 (col. 1114, n. l) on letter 145.
SYNOPS⟨I⟩S. — Monet ut epistolae praecedentes ad metropolitanos scriptae, ad unumquemque Juliani cura vel Aetii perveniant; episcopalem ante omnia requiri constantiam; nihil esse in sua epistola vel novi, vel obscuri, vel dubii.
SYNOPSIS. — He advises that the preceding letters, written to the metropolitans, should reach each of them by the care of Julian or of Aetius; that episcopal constancy is required before all things; that there is nothing in his letter either new, or obscure, or doubtful.
(a) ‹ut de ea putent› · printed under col 1123
Sic optimus cod. Ratisp. Al., aptius.
So the excellent Regensburg manuscript. Others have aptius.
(b) ‹praedicationis tam› · printed under col 1123
Quesnellus, plena. Melius in Ratisp. Ex his patet Leonem detexisse difficultates contra suam epistolam excitatas non ex Graeca interpretatione ejusdem minus congrua, de qua antea erat sollicitus epistolis 130 et 131, sed ex calumniantium vanitate, qui obscuritatis praetextu veritati non acquiescebant, dimanare; unde horum audaciam ab imperatore compescendam petiit.
Quesnel has plena; better in the Regensburg manuscript. From these words it is plain that Leo had discovered that the difficulties raised against his letter flowed not from its less fitting Greek translation, about which he had earlier been anxious in letters 130 and 131, but from the vanity of slanderers, who on the pretext of obscurity would not acquiesce in the truth; hence he asked that their audacity be checked by the emperor.
(c) ‹EPISTOLA› · printed under col 1123
Alias 121. Scripta 1 Septemb. an. 457.
Formerly 121. Written 1 September in the year 457.
(d) ‹AD AETIUM› · printed under col 1123 (the call stands before the address line)
Quesnellus ex cod. Grimanico edidit; nos in Ratisp. invenimus.
Quesnel published it from the Grimani manuscript; we found it in the Regensburg manuscript.
(e) ‹perversitas quidquam› · printed under col 1123
Sic Ratisp. Quesnellus, quod Ecclesiam Domini turbet.
So the Regensburg manuscript. Quesnel has quod Ecclesiam Domini turbet.
(f) ‹pro diligentia› · printed under col 1123
Forte, nostra, vel supplendum officii, aut quid simile. De epistolis vero hic memoratis vide annot. 2 (Col. 1121, n. f) in epist. 151.
Perhaps nostra, or officii or something similar must be supplied. On the letters mentioned here see annotation 2 (col. 1121, n. f) on letter 151.
(g) ‹nobis ut› · printed under col 1123
Confer Admonit. in epist. 149, num. 1.
Compare the admonition on letter 149, no. 1.
(h) ‹firment atque corroborent› · printed under col 1123
Ratisp., et sciant.
The Regensburg manuscript has et sciant.
(i) ‹Exemplaria quoque› · printed under col 1123, running on under col 1124
Idem codex, epistolarum. Hinc discimus ad solos Gallos et Italos, id est Mediolanensis provinciae episcopos, Leonem suam ad Flavianum epistola misisse, ut eamdem solemni subscriptione reciperent. Si enim aliarum Occidentis provinciarum episcopos idipsum postulasset, cum aliorum quoque responsa accepisset, tum vero exemplaria eorum pariter transmisisset. Ideo vero ad Gallos et Italos ea de re scripsit, quia alia scribendi occasio, quoad hos, se obtulerat, quoad alios non item.
The same manuscript has epistolarum. Hence we learn that Leo sent his letter to Flavian only to the bishops of Gaul and Italy, that is, of the province of Milan, so that they might receive it with a solemn subscription. For if he had asked the same of the bishops of the other provinces of the West, since he would have received the replies of the others too, he would then have sent copies of them likewise. He wrote on that matter to the bishops of Gaul and Italy for this reason: that another occasion of writing had offered itself as regards these, but not as regards the others.
(j) ‹litterarum quas› · printed under col 1124
Epist. 97 et 99.
Letters 97 and 99.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Ut litteras in Orientem scriptas unicuique dirigat. — II. Se pariter misisse litteras a Gallis et Italis ad se scriptas. Item et de aliis.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That he should send the letters written to the East to each person. — II. That he has likewise sent the letters written to him by the bishops of Gaul and Italy. Likewise also about other matters.
(i) continued from col 1123, set in n1123.
(j) printed under this column; its call is in col 1123, set in n1123.
(k) ‹principi, quam› · printed under col 1124
Nimirum Anatolio, Juliano et Aspari.
Namely to Anatolius, Julian and Aspar.
(l) ‹Gerontium misimus› · printed under col 1124
Quesnellus, vel ad dilectionem vestram, vel ad filium nostrum SPORATIUM; et in margine: Forte, per dilectionem vestram, vel per filium nostrum, etc. Ex Ratisp. emendavimus. Storatii lectio dubitationem sustulit num Sporatius, qui fuit consul in Oriente an. 452, hic nominetur. Neque vero credimus intelligi Storatium, qui fuit praefectus Urbis an. 443; ejusmodi enim viri aliquo honorifico titulo appellari solent.
Quesnel has vel ad dilectionem vestram, vel ad filium nostrum SPORATIUM; and in the margin: "Perhaps per dilectionem vestram, vel per filium nostrum, etc." We have corrected it from the Regensburg manuscript. The reading Storatius has removed the doubt whether Sporatius, who was consul in the East in the year 452, is named here. Nor do we believe that the Storatius who was prefect of the City in the year 443 is meant; for men of that kind are usually called by some honorific title.
(m) ‹EPISTOLA› · printed under col 1124
Alias 123. Scripta 11 Octob. an. 457.
Formerly 123. Written 11 October in the year 457.
(n) ‹AD EPISCOPOS AEGYPTIOS› · printed under col 1124 (the call stands before the address line)
In solo codice Grimanico, ex quo a Quesnello edita fuit, hactenus inventa est.
It has so far been found only in the Grimani manuscript, from which it was published by Quesnel.
(o) ‹LEO› · printed under col 1124
Post Proterii mortem persecutione contra episcopos catholicos excitata, plures Constantinopolim profecti libellum supplicem imperatori obtulerunt, qui legitur tom. IV. Concil. pag. 1837. Ad hos Leo hanc epistolam dedit, et iterum epistolas 158 et 160; in hujus postremae inscriptione ipsorum episcoporum nomina recensentur, quae cum nominibus laudato libello subcriptis fere concordant.
After the death of Proterius, when a persecution had been stirred up against the catholic bishops, many of them went to Constantinople and presented a petition to the emperor, which is read in vol. IV of the Councils, p. 1837. To these Leo gave this letter, and again letters 158 and 160; in the inscription of the last of these the names of the bishops themselves are listed, and they almost agree with the names subscribed to the petition just mentioned.
(p) ‹principem nostrum› · printed under col 1124
Cum in epist. 148 nullum sit horum Aegyptiorum episcoporum indicium, aliae hic indicantur litterae ad Leonem Augustum, quae periere.
Since in letter 148 there is no indication of these Egyptian bishops, another letter to Leo Augustus is indicated here, which has perished.
SYNOPSIS. — Episcopos Aegyptios pro fide extorres consolatur, et ut pro incarnationis mysterio patienter adversa tolerent, hortatur.
SYNOPSIS. — He consoles the Egyptian bishops, exiled for the faith, and exhorts them to bear adversities patiently for the mystery of the incarnation.