PL 54 · cols. 966–969
Leo the Great, Letters
Letter XCIX
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 966–969
Letter XCIX
(c) ‹EPISTOLA› · printed under col 965
Al. post epist. 76. Quae autem erat 99, nunc 126. Scripta circa Decemb. an. 451.
Elsewhere after Letter 76. The one that was 99 is now 126. Written about December of the year 451.
(d) ‹SYNODICA› · printed under col 965
Est in ms collect. 5, 11, 12, 22, 23 et 24. Cum S. Leo huic synodicae respondeat die 27 Januarii anni sequentis epist. 102, circa Decembrem anni currentis haec synodica exarata credi potest, et probabilius ante epistolam sequentem datam die 18 Decembris.
It is in the manuscripts of collections 5, 11, 12, 22, 23 and 24. Since St Leo answers this synodal letter on 27 January of the following year in Letter 102, this synodal letter may be believed to have been drawn up about December of the current year, and more probably before the following letter, dated 18 December.
(e) ‹AD S. LEONEM PAPAM› · printed under col 965
Mss. collect. 5, aliique inde profecti addunt loco synopsis: Fidei ejus, quam ad Orientem direxit, laudem dicentium.
The manuscripts of collection 5, and others derived from it, add in place of a synopsis: "[The letter of bishops] speaking in praise of his faith, which he sent to the East."
(f) ‹papae LEONI,› · printed under col 965
Vide not. 1 Quesn.
See Quesnel's note 1.
(g) ‹VENERIUS,› · printed under col 965
Quesnellus, Constantinus. Praetulimus lectionem Rainaudi, quippe quam noster Vindebon. collect. 5 et alius Thuan. Quesn. approbant; cum praesertim eidem lectioni suffragetur cod. Ratisp. in responsione Leonis epist. 102.
Quesnel, "Constantinus". We have preferred Raynaud's reading, since our Vienna manuscript of collection 5 and another, Quesnel's Thou manuscript, support it; especially as the Regensburg manuscript supports the same reading in Leo's reply, Letter 102.
(h) ‹MAXIMUS,› · printed under col 965
Duo mss. Thuan., Armaturus. Codd. collect. 11 et 24, Armatarus. Trecopith., Armatharius. Ratisp. in epist. 1⟨0⟩2, Armazorius.
The two Thou manuscripts, "Armaturus". The manuscripts of collections 11 and 24, "Armatarus". Troyes-Pithou, "Armatharius". The Regensburg manuscript in Letter 102, "Armazorius".
(i) ‹SABINUS,› · printed under col 965, running on under col 966
Sic nostri codd. ac praesertim collectionis 5 cum Sirmondo et editis ante Quesn. Epistola Leonis 102 et subjectae subscriptiones concinunt, quae primo loco Valerianum exhibent, deinde Valerium. Apud Quesnellum diverso ordine, primo Valerius, deinde Valerianus legitur.
So our manuscripts, and especially those of collection 5, with Sirmond and the editions before Quesnel. Leo's Letter 102 and the subscriptions appended agree, which give Valerianus in first place, then Valerius. In Quesnel, in a different order, Valerius is read first, then Valerianus.
(j) ‹CONSTANTIUS,› · printed under col 966
Quidam inferioris notae codices, Nestorius. Alii melius, Nectarius, ut in epist. 102.
Some manuscripts of lesser note, "Nestorius". Others better, "Nectarius", as in Letter 102.
(k) ‹EULALIUS,› · printed under col 966
Ita Quesn. et nostri codd. collect. 5 et 21. In Vat. collect. 11, Eustasius. In alio Vat. collect. 24, Eustasius. Sirmondus, Eustachius. Vulgati Leonis, Eutychius, ad quos accedit Ratisp. in epist. 102.
So Quesnel and our manuscripts of collections 5 and 21. In the Vatican manuscript of collection 11, "Eustasius". In another Vatican manuscript, of collection 24, "Eustasius". Sirmond, "Eustachius". The printed editions of Leo, "Eutychius", with which the Regensburg manuscript agrees in Letter 102.
(l) ‹EUGENIUS,› · printed under col 966
Vulgati Leonis ante Quesn. cum Vat. collect. 11 et cum aliis quatuor codicibus epistolae 102, Hilarius.
The printed editions of Leo before Quesnel, with the Vatican manuscript of collection 11 and with four other manuscripts of Letter 102, "Hilarius".
(m) ‹GERONTIUS,› · printed under col 966
Proculianus in codd. collect. 11 et 24.
"Proculianus" in the manuscripts of collections 11 and 24.
(n) ‹HONORATUS,› · printed under col 966
Vulgati Leonis ante Quesn., Hypartius. Sirmondus in margine, Epatius. Cod. Ratisp. in epist. 102, Apartius. Antiquus Thuaneus, Ebartius.
The printed editions of Leo before Quesnel, "Hypartius". Sirmond in the margin, "Epatius". The Regensburg manuscript in Letter 102, "Apartius". The old Thou manuscript, "Ebartius".
(o) ‹MAXIMINUS,› · printed under col 966
Mss. collect. 11 et 24 ac Sirmondus in margine, Inzantius.
The manuscripts of collections 11 and 24, and Sirmond in the margin, "Inzantius".
(p) ‹Perlata ad nos› · printed under col 966
Epistola 67, cui rescribunt.
Letter 67, to which they are replying.
(q) ‹a nobis› · printed under col 966
Ita pleraeque editiones cum nostro Vindebon. collect. 5. Caeteri codices cum Sirmondo disparati. Post pauca, pro aurarum, in ms. Vat. collect. 24, aquarum, quod quibusdam magis placebit. Vide not. 2 Quesn.
So most editions, with our Vienna manuscript of collection 5. The other manuscripts, with Sirmond, "disparati". A little further on, for "aurarum" (of the weather), the Vatican manuscript of collection 24 has "aquarum" (of the waters), which some will prefer. See Quesnel's note 2.
(r) ‹instructione patefacta,› · printed under col 966
Vide not. 3 Quesnelli. Paulo post nobiscum pro vobiscum in eodem Vat. collect. 24.
See Quesnel's note 3. A little further on, "nobiscum" (with us) for "vobiscum" (with you) in the same Vatican manuscript of collection 24.
Synopsis. — I. Tarditatem suam in rescribendo excusant. — II. Omnes in Gallia Leonis epistolam ad Flavianum, ut fidei symbolum recepisse. — III. In ea fidelibus et infidelibus arcanum incarnationis mysterium retegi. — IV. Nuntiis ex Oriente allatis se a scribendo ad imperatorem abstinuisse. — V. Leonem pontificem a Deo datum esse Ecclesiae gratulantur.
Synopsis. — I. They excuse their slowness in replying. — II. [They say] that all in Gaul have received Leo's letter to Flavian as a symbol of the faith. — III. That in it the hidden mystery of the Incarnation is disclosed to believers and unbelievers. — IV. That on news brought from the East they refrained from writing to the emperor. — V. They rejoice that Leo has been given to the Church by God as pontiff.
(a) ‹apostolatus vestri scripta,› · printed under col 967
Codd. collect. 21 delent ita. Mox ascripsit pro ascribit est in Vat. collect. 24 nec non in editis ante Quesn.
The manuscripts of collection 21 delete "ita". Shortly after, "ascripsit" (has inscribed) for "ascribit" (inscribes) is in the Vatican manuscript of collection 24, and also in the editions before Quesnel.
(b) ‹tanto munere› · printed under col 967
Idem codex et editi ante Quesn., quod non solum.
The same manuscript and the editions before Quesnel, "quod non solum".
(c) ‹vestrae debet› · printed under col 967
Vulgati inserunt quisque. Delevimus ex omnibus nostris codd. atque Sirmondo.
The printed editions insert "quisque" (each). We have deleted it on the authority of all our manuscripts and of Sirmond.
(d) ‹veritatis inimicus› · printed under col 967
Tres codd. Quesn. et quinque nostri, stillat.
Three of Quesnel's manuscripts and five of ours, "stillat".
(e) ‹de Orientalibus partibus› · printed under col 967
Nuntium intelligunt de mutata rerum facie post Theodosii mortem, et de suscepta jam in toto Oriente Leonis epistola; ac propterea ad novum imperatorem scribere, uti vivente Theodosio Leo postulaverat ex annot. 7 (Col. 887, n. b) in ep. 67, necessarium amplius non putarunt. Aliqui codices carent voce, partibus.
By the news they mean the changed face of affairs after the death of Theodosius, and the reception of Leo's letter already throughout the East; and therefore they no longer thought it necessary to write to the new emperor, as Leo had asked while Theodosius was living, according to annotation 7 (col. 887, n. b) on Letter 67. Some manuscripts lack the word "partibus".
(f) ‹nutritam› · printed under col 967
Antiquae editiones, nostris.
The old editions, "nostris" (our [times]).
(g) ‹latere non potuit;› · printed under col 967
Ita duos codices Quesn. et tres nostri melioris notae. Alii, Ad gloriosae fidei aedificationem, vel cumulum.
So two of Quesnel's manuscripts and three of ours of better note. Others, "to the building up", or "to the increase", "of the glorious faith".
(h), (i), (j): printed under this column ((j) running on under col 968); their calls are in col 968, set in n968.
(h) ‹inventos amisit.› · printed under col 967
Vos itaque respiciat conservando apostolatum vestrum misericors Deus, et Ecclesiam, etc., in mss. collect. 21. Cod. Vindebon. collect. 5, Respiciat in conservando, etc.
"May the merciful God therefore look upon you by preserving your Apostleship, and the Church", etc., in the manuscripts of collection 21. The Vienna manuscript of collection 5, "May He look, in preserving", etc.
(i) ‹semper habentes,› · printed under col 967
Vindebon. collect. 5. non desinimus.
The Vienna manuscript of collection 5, "non desinimus" (we do not cease).
(j) ‹venerande papa.› · printed under col 967, running on under col 968
In antiquis editionibus et in codd. collect. 12, 21 et 24, tres priores subscriptiones tantummodo legebantur; in mss. autem collect. 11 sola prima Rustici subscriptio. Integrae inveniuntur in mss. collectionis 5, et primum editae fuerunt a Sirmondo ex cod. Nicolai Fabri, qui in Thuaneam bibliothecam transivit. Mirum est omitti subscriptionem Ravennii, qui tamen primus in titulo inscribitur. At ad Ravennium pertinere videntur illa, quae alia manu Rustici subscriptioni praemittuntur: Ora pro me, Domine. Harduinus vero hanc notationem subscriptionibus affixit: Subscriptiones integrae, ut sunt in mss. olim Thuaneo, nunc Colbertino, Ravennius episcopus Arelatensis, Venerius Narbonensis, Maximus Regiensis, etc. At Rusticus est Narbonensis, Venerius autem Massiliensis. Ante Maximum ponendus erat Constantianus. Praeterea nomina civitatum in editis non leguntur, licet hae subscriptiones a Sirmondo e codice olim Thuaneo sumptae fuerint. Ipsas ergo subscriptiones, ut in codice exprimebantur, Harduinus ea notatione non exhibuit. In codice quidem Vindebonensi collect. 5, quem Thuaneo plane similem deprehendimus, subscriptiones vulgatis similes sunt, nec Ravenni nomen ibidem legitur.
In the old editions and in the manuscripts of collections 12, 21 and 24, only the first three subscriptions used to be read; but in the manuscripts of collection 11 only the first, that of Rusticus. They are found complete in the manuscripts of collection 5, and were first published by Sirmond from the manuscript of Nicolas Le Fèvre, which passed into the library of de Thou. It is surprising that the subscription of Ravennius is omitted, who is nevertheless written first in the heading. But the words that are set before the subscription of Rusticus "in another hand" seem to belong to Ravennius: "Pray for me, lord." Hardouin, however, attached this notice to the subscriptions: "The subscriptions complete, as they are in the manuscripts formerly de Thou's, now Colbert's: Ravennius bishop of Arles, Venerius of Narbonne, Maximus of Riez", etc. But Rusticus is of Narbonne, and Venerius of Marseilles. Constantianus should have been placed before Maximus. Besides, the names of the cities are not read in the printed editions, although these subscriptions were taken by Sirmond from the manuscript formerly de Thou's. Hardouin therefore did not present, with that notice, the subscriptions themselves as they were written in the manuscript. In the Vienna manuscript of collection 5, indeed, which we have found to be plainly similar to de Thou's, the subscriptions are like those of the printed editions, and the name of Ravennius is not read there either.
(k) ‹supplex rogo.› · printed under col 968
Vulgati, Constantinus. Correximus ex Vindebon. Confer annot. 4 (Col. 965, n. g).
The printed editions, "Constantinus". We have corrected it from the Vienna manuscript. Compare annotation 4 (col. 965, n. g).
(a) printed under this column; its call is in col 970, set in n970
(b) printed under this column (continued under col 970); its call is in col 970, set in n970