PL 54 · cols. 505–510
Sermones S. Leoni Magno attributi (Appendix ad primam partem operum S. Leonis Magni), I-XX
Sermons XIV–XV
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 505–510
Sermons XIV–XV
(a) ‹anchor: propria singulorum,› · call in col 505
Addimus communis ex nostris codd. Vat.
We add communis from our Vatican codices.
(printed under page 258)
(b) ‹anchor: animorum motus› · call in col 505
Quesnellus, concordent.
Quesnel: concordent.
(printed under page 258)
(c) ‹anchor: Nihil dissonum› · call in col 505
Idem Quesn., comprehendatur.
The same Quesnel: comprehendatur.
(printed under page 258)
porum, qui celebriores fuerant, consecrationis dies quotannis celebraretur, quemadmodum ex SS. Gregorii Magni, Ambrosii, Basilii et aliorum exemplo manifestum est. Quam potiori vero jure pontificatus principis apostolorum Ecclesiaeque primatis, annua debuit festivitate recoli, saltem in Ecclesia Romana, ubi sedem fixerat. Cum porro duplex modo constituta sit Cathedrae S. Petri commemoratio ex Pauli IV Romani pontificis decreto anni 1557, una XVIII kal. Februarii pro Romana, altera VIII kal. Martii pro Antiochena, constat unicam olim fuisse in Ecclesia solemnitatem VIII kal. Martias, qua utriusque memoria, vel potius generaliter assumptio S. Petri ad episcopatum honore debito celebrabatur. Perseveravitque in Romana Ecclesia usque ad Pauli IV decretum, quod a Gallicanis Ecclesiis sero admodum usu receptum est, ut ex Breviariis et missalibus patet; sed nec hodie ab aliquibus recipitur. Caeterum, cum sermo de Cathedra S. Petri, qui sub S. Augustini nomine circumfertur, jampridem a viris eruditis, tamquam spurius fetus in appendices relegatus sit, nullum est illius festivitatis monimentum quod ad hujus antiquitatem accedat. Ex quo etiam laterculus Sylvii a Joanne Bollando jam ex parte editus, vel suppositionis arguitur, vel saltem depravationis eo loci ubi pro festo Cathedrae VIII kal. Martii, depositionem utriusque apostoli notatam habet. Plura de hoc festo videre est apud emin. card. Baronium, tum in Annal. tom. I, tum in Notis ad Martyrologium nec non et apud doctissimum nostrum Carolum Le Cointe Annalium Ecclesiasticorum Franciae conditorem, tom. II, ad an. Chr. 566. n. 18 et seqq. » Haec cum ille suo loco in prima editione statuisset, re maturius expensa in praefatione generali, quam postremo impressit, sermonem Leoni tribuisse poenituit. At in praefatione secundae editionis, num. 3: Re iterum examinata, inquit, styloque perpenso, ad primam mentem redimus, hunc sermonem Leoni abjudicare non ausi.
[... of those bishops] who had been the more renowned, the day of consecration was celebrated every year, as is plain from the example of Saints Gregory the Great, Ambrose, Basil and others. With how much better right, indeed, ought the pontificate of the prince of the apostles and primate of the Church to have been commemorated by a yearly festival, at least in the Roman Church, where he had fixed his see. Further, since a twofold commemoration of the Chair of St Peter is now established by the decree of Paul IV, Roman pontiff, of the year 1557, one on the eighteenth day before the kalends of February for the Roman chair, the other on the eighth day before the kalends of March for the Antiochene, it is certain that there was formerly a single solemnity in the Church, on the eighth day before the kalends of March, on which the memory of both, or rather, in general, the raising of St Peter to the episcopate, was celebrated with due honour. And it continued in the Roman Church down to the decree of Paul IV, which was received into use by the Gallican Churches very late indeed, as is evident from the Breviaries and missals; and even today it is not received by some. For the rest, since the sermon on the Chair of St Peter which circulates under the name of St Augustine has long since been relegated by learned men to the appendices as a spurious offspring, there is no monument of that festival which approaches the antiquity of this one. Whence also the calendar of Sylvius, already published in part by John Bollandus, is convicted either of being supposititious, or at least of corruption at that place where, instead of the feast of the Chair on the eighth day before the kalends of March, it has the deposition of both apostles noted. More about this feast may be seen in the most eminent Cardinal Baronius, both in the Annals, vol. I, and in the Notes on the Martyrology, and likewise in our most learned Charles Le Cointe, author of the Ecclesiastical Annals of France, vol. II, at the year of Christ 566, n. 18 and following." When he had laid this down in its own place in the first edition, then, the matter having been weighed more maturely, in the general preface, which he printed last, he repented of having ascribed the sermon to Leo. But in the preface of the second edition, n. 3, he says: The matter having been examined again, and the style weighed, we return to our first mind, not having dared to deny this sermon to Leo.
Mirum vero maxime accidit, homini in Leonis lectione versato videri potuisse sequentis sermonis stylum cum Leonino concinere. Primo enim formula c. 1: Dilectissimi fratres, et illa c. 3 bis repetita: Fratres charissimi, a Leonis Sermonibus omnino alienae sunt. Dein adjectivum barbarum discordabile c. 2 et (ut de tota syntaxi manifeste dissimili taceamus) illa, quibus cap. 3 S. Petrum consulentem nobis coelestis curiae consulem vocat, a Leonis Latinitate atque ratione nimium abhorrent; adeo ut nihil conferant voces ignitos, gratiae largitor, aliaeque ejusmodi, quae non tam in Leone quam in aliis scriptoribus similiter reperientur, uti legimus in Vita S. Honorati ab Hilario scripta num. 3, largitorem gratiae Deum, num. 32, ignito sermoni suo, etc. Ejusdem generis sunt capita quae adjecimus. Nam, ut omittamus allegoricas voces, senatores mundi, in coelesti curia, regna siderea, ea praesertim cap. 5, ut ad vos, fratres mei, qui in Christo vivitis linguae nostrae passibus redeamus. a Leonis nostri stylo alienissima sunt. Praeterea quod de multitudine simoniacorum in luxuria viventium eodem capite traditur, sequiori saeculo convenit. Hinc pluribus mss. conspirantibus in solius Leonis nomine praeferendo, forte alicujus Leonis Romani pontificis hic fetus est, qui posteriori et corruptiori aevo floruerit. Quod porro Quesnellus animadvertit de notata depositione apostolorum Petri et Pauli VII kal. Martii in Calendario Sylvii, conferendum est cum iis quae de hujus Calendario statuemus in observationibus ad sermonem 82, num. 4.
It is indeed most surprising that, to a man versed in the reading of Leo, the style of the following sermon could have seemed to accord with the Leonine. For first, the formula in ch. 1, "Dearly beloved brethren", and that one twice repeated in ch. 3, "Dearest brethren", are altogether foreign to Leo's Sermons. Next, the barbarous adjective discordabile in ch. 2, and (to say nothing of the whole syntax, which is manifestly unlike) those words by which in ch. 3 he calls St Peter "the consul of the heavenly court, taking counsel for us", are too far removed from Leo's Latinity and manner; so much so that the words "fiery", "bestower of grace", and others of the kind contribute nothing, which will be found in like manner not so much in Leo as in other writers, as we read in the Life of St Honoratus written by Hilary, n. 3, "God the bestower of grace", n. 32, "to his fiery speech", etc. Of the same kind are the chapters which we have added. For, to pass over the allegorical expressions "senators of the world", "in the heavenly court", "starry realms", those words especially in ch. 5, "that we may return, by the steps of our tongue, to you, my brethren, who live in Christ", are most foreign to the style of our Leo. Moreover, what is related in the same chapter about the multitude of simoniacs living in luxury suits a later age. Hence, since several manuscripts agree in setting forth the name of Leo alone, perhaps this is the offspring of some Leo, Roman pontiff, who flourished in a later and more corrupt age. Further, what Quesnel remarks about the deposition of the apostles Peter and Paul noted on the seventh day before the kalends of March in the Calendar of Sylvius is to be compared with what we shall lay down about this man's Calendar in the observations on sermon 82, n. 4.
<!-- note: The prose is printed across the full width of the page head (cols 505–506), above the two-column text. It begins mid-word ("porum", the end of a word broken at the foot of the previous page; "[... of those bishops]" in the English is supplied for sense and should be checked against the preceding page), continuing the Ballerini's admonition on Sermo XIV: first the close of their quotation from Quesnel (roman type, ending at the closing guillemet), then their own remarks (italic on the page, with the quoted words in roman; no italic markup is set, per the unit rule). The admonition ends in this column at "num. 4." It is followed by the title of Sermo XIV [Al. inter Leoninos XCVI], In Cathedra S. Petri, with the source line "Ex cod. ms. Bibliothecae Regiae a Quesnello editus, et ex Vaticanis suppletus." (title matter, not set here), then the sermon's text (Cap. I–III) and footnotes (a)–(e). Small-capital roman numerals of dates are set in capitals. The full stop before "a Leonis nostri stylo" is as printed. Worn type set as intended: "Honorati" (the t looks like l). Q3a: the whole band (both halves) is set here; nothing of it stands under col. 506. --> Ex cod. ms. Bibliothecae Regiae a Quesnello editus, et ex Vaticanis suppletus.
Published by Quesnel from a manuscript codex of the Royal Library, and supplemented from Vatican ones.
<!-- note: The prose is printed across the full width of the page head (cols 505–506), above the two-column text. It begins mid-word ("porum", the end of a word broken at the foot of the previous page; "[... of those bishops]" in the English is supplied for sense and should be checked against the preceding page), continuing the Ballerini's admonition on Sermo XIV: first the close of their quotation from Quesnel (roman type, ending at the closing guillemet), then their own remarks (italic on the page; quoted words in roman). The admonition ends in this column at "num. 4." It is followed by the title of Sermo XIV [Al. inter Leoninos XCVI], In Cathedra S. Petri, and under it, in col. 505 proper, the Ballerini's italic source notice "Ex cod. ms. ... suppletus." (centred on two lines), now set here as the third paragraph; then the sermon's text (Cap. I–III) and footnotes (a)–(e). Small-capital roman numerals of dates are set in capitals. The full stop before "a Leonis nostri stylo" is as printed. The first two paragraphs and their English stand as set before; the English of the source notice was made fresh from the page, the part not having been read in this pass. Q7b: the two admonition paragraphs and their English stood TWICE in this file, the second time with asterisk italic markup (against the unit rule); the second, marked copy was removed and the unmarked copy above stands, word for word the same. -->
(d) ‹anchor: enitescat. Sed› · call in col 506
Vat. mss., quia.
The Vatican manuscripts: quia.
(printed under page 258)
(e) ‹anchor: CAP. III. — Jam› · call in col 506
Supplevimus vero ex nostris codd.
We have supplied vero from our codices.
(printed under page 258)
(a) ‹anchor: spei nostrae ora› · call in col 507
Quesn., relaxet.
Quesnel: relaxet.
(printed under page 259)
(b) ‹anchor: Expedit ergo, fratres› · call in col 507
Alias, fratres mei.
Elsewhere, fratres mei.
(printed under page 259)
(c) ‹anchor: in populo Dei› · call in col 507 (no call letter printed in the text; the note refers to the words in parentheses)
Uncis inclusa leguntur in cod. Vat. 1271.
The words enclosed in brackets are read in the Vatican codex 1271.
(printed under page 259)
(d) ‹anchor: seniorum laudent› · call in col 507
Al., eum.
Others, eum.
(printed under page 259)
(e) ‹anchor: per se Veritas› · call in col 507
Al., dicit.
Others, dicit.
(printed under page 259)
(f) ‹anchor: At contra› · call in col 507
Al., de reproborum.
Others, de reproborum.
(printed under page 259)
(g) ‹anchor: et non cecidit,› · call in col 508
Quinque voces seqq. praebuit laudatus cod. Vat. 1271.
The five words that follow were supplied by the aforesaid Vatican codex 1271.
(printed under page 259)
Hic sermo perperam Leonis papae inscribitur in duobus Lectionariis S. Benedicti Padilironensibus; et subjicitur in uno ms. alii sermoni ejusdem festivitatis Leoni pariter attributo, cujus mentionem fecimus in praefatione hujus appendicis num. 30. Sicut autem ibidem probavimus eum esse antiquam versionem sermonis S. Procli episcopi Constantinopolitani, ita et hunc ex simili sententiarum ac scribendi ratione ineditam interpretationem esse alterius sermonis ejusdem auctoris non improbabiliter credimus, cum praesertim plures ipsius orationes desiderari compertum sit.
This sermon is wrongly inscribed with the name of Leo the pope in two Lectionaries of San Benedetto di Polirone; and in one manuscript it is subjoined to another sermon of the same festival, likewise attributed to Leo, of which we made mention in the preface of this appendix, no. 30. Now just as we proved there that that one is an ancient version of a sermon of St Proclus, bishop of Constantinople, so we believe, not improbably, from the like manner of its thoughts and of its writing, that this one too is an unpublished translation of another sermon of the same author, especially since it is ascertained that several of his orations are missing.
<!-- note: a single italic admonition (hanging indent, twelve lines) in the lower middle of the column, directly under the title SERMO XV. and its rubric In Annuntiatione beatissimae Dei Genitricis et Virginis Mariae., and directly above CAP. I. (Adventum Domini et Salvatoris nostri). Above the title stands the end of Sermo XIV (caps V end, VI, VII), run over from col. 507. The admonition does not run over from or into a neighbouring column; the foot of the column holds footnote matter, set elsewhere. No ep_508.md existed when this pass ran: the "other" line of the notes of 508, which is said to quote this admonition with its English beside the misprint remarks, lies in a file not named for this pass and was NOT edited; the quotation still has to be taken out of it there. English made fresh from the page. -->
(a) ‹anchor: Ave, Maria, inquit,› · call in col 509
Unus codex omittit hoc secundum Ave.
One codex omits this second Ave.
(printed under page 260)
(b) ‹anchor: apud se diutius› · call in col 509
Unus cod., cum amore; alius, quam amore. Exigente contextu emendavimus, cum timore, unde Gabriel dixit : Ne timeas.
One codex has cum amore; another, quam amore. As the context requires, we have emended to cum timore, whence Gabriel said: Ne timeas.
(printed under page 260)
(c) ‹anchor: David patris› · call in col 509
Al., sui.
Others, sui.
(printed under page 260)
(d) ‹anchor: postulantis; quando› · call in col 509
Mss., thronum.
The manuscripts: thronum.
(printed under page 260)
(e) ‹anchor: expavescere : noli› · call in col 509
Unus cod., de tua.
One codex: de tua.
(printed under page 260)
(f) ‹anchor: nec ardebis› · call in col 509
Al., carnis.
Others, carnis.
(printed under page 260)
(g) ‹anchor: ore pudico,› · call in col 509
Supplendam credimus vocem nullum.
We believe the word nullum is to be supplied.
(printed under page 260)
(h) ‹anchor: castitate florescens,› · call in col 510
Forte, in me. . . integritatem.
Perhaps, in me. . . integritatem.
(printed under page 260)
(i) ‹anchor: radiis suis› · call in col 510
Forte, penetralia.
Perhaps, penetralia.
(printed under page 260)
(j) ‹anchor: partus sacer,› · call in col 510 (the call is printed "(i)" in the text)
Unus cod., cujus parientem non cognoverat patrem.
One codex: cujus parientem non cognoverat patrem.
(printed under page 260)
(k) ‹anchor: visceribus effusus› · call in col 510
Sex voces sequentes in uno ms. desiderantur.
The six words that follow are wanting in one manuscript.
(printed under page 260)